§1012 — Basis of property—cost

337 citing cases

(a)In general

The basis of property shall be the cost of such property, except as otherwise provided in this subchapter and subchapters C (relating to corporate distributions and adjustments), K (relating to partners and partnerships), and P (relating to capital gains and losses).

(b)Special rule for apportioned real estate taxes

The cost of real property shall not include any amount in respect of real property taxes which are treated under section 164(d) as imposed on the taxpayer.

(c)Determinations by account
(1)In general

In the case of the sale, exchange, or other disposition of a specified security on or after the applicable date, the conventions prescribed by regulations under this section shall be applied on an account by account basis.

(2)Application to certain regulated investment companies
(A)In general

Except as provided in subparagraph (B), any stock for which an average basis method is permissible under this section which is acquired before January 1, 2012, shall be treated as a separate account from any such stock acquired on or after such date.

(B)Election for treatment as single account

If a regulated investment company described in subparagraph (A) elects to have this subparagraph apply with respect to one or more of its stockholders—

(i)

subparagraph (A) shall not apply with respect to any stock in such regulated investment company held by such stockholders, and

(ii)

all stock in such regulated investment company which is held by such stockholders shall be treated as covered securities described in section 6045(g)(3) without regard to the date of the acquisition of such stock.

A rule similar to the rule of the preceding sentence shall apply with respect to a broker holding such stock as a nominee.

(3)Definitions

For purposes of this section, the terms “specified security” and “applicable date” shall have the meaning given such terms in section 6045(g).

(d)Average basis for stock acquired pursuant to a dividend reinvestment plan
(1)In general

In the case of any stock acquired after December 31, 2011, in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan, the basis of such stock while held as part of such plan shall be determined using one of the methods which may be used for determining the basis of stock in a regulated investment company.

(2)Treatment after transfer

In the case of the transfer to another account of stock to which paragraph (1) applies, such stock shall have a cost basis in such other account equal to its basis in the dividend reinvestment plan immediately before such transfer (properly adjusted for any fees or other charges taken into account in connection with such transfer).

(3)Separate accounts; election for treatment as single account
(A)In general

Rules similar to the rules of subsection (c)(2) shall apply for purposes of this subsection.

(B)Average basis method

Notwithstanding paragraph (1), in the case of an election under rules similar to the rules of subsection (c)(2)(B) with respect to stock held in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan, the average basis method is permissible with respect to all such stock without regard to the date of the acquisition of such stock.

(4)Dividend reinvestment plan

For purposes of this subsection—

(A)In general

The term “dividend reinvestment plan” means any arrangement under which dividends on any stock are reinvested in stock identical to the stock with respect to which the dividends are paid.

(B)Initial stock acquisition treated as acquired in connection with plan

Stock shall be treated as acquired in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan if such stock is acquired pursuant to such plan or if the dividends paid on such stock are subject to such plan.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1012-1Basis of property Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) General rule. In general, the basis of property is the cost thereof. The cost is the amount paid for such property in cash or other property. This general rule is subject to exceptions stated in subchapter O (relating to gain or loss on the disposition of property), subchapter C (relating to corporate distributions and adjustments), subchapter K (relating to partners and partnerships), and subchapter P (relating to capital gains and losses), chapter 1 of the code.

    (b) Real estate taxes as part of cost. In computing the cost of real property, the purchaser shall not take into account any amount paid to the seller as reimbursement for real property taxes which are treated under section 164(d) as imposed upon the purchaser. This rule applies whether or not the contract of sale calls for the purchaser to reimburse the seller for such real estate taxes paid or to be paid by the seller. On the other hand, where the purchaser pays (or assumes liability for) real estate taxes which are treated under section 164(d) as imposed upon the seller, such taxes shall be considered part of the cost of the property. It is immaterial whether or not the contract of sale specifies that the sale price has been reduced by, or is in any way intended to reflect, real estate taxes allocable to the seller under section 164(d). For illustrations of the application of this paragraph, see paragraph (b) of § 1.1001-1.

    (c) Sale of stock—(1) In general. (i) Except as provided in paragraph (e)(2) of this section (dealing with stock for which the average basis method is permitted), if a taxpayer sells or transfers shares of stock in a corporation that the taxpayer purchased or acquired on different dates or at different prices and the taxpayer does not adequately identify the lot from which the stock is sold or transferred, the stock sold or transferred is charged against the earliest lot the taxpayer purchased or acquired to determine the basis and holding period of the stock. If the earliest lot purchased or acquired is held in a stock certificate that represents multiple lots of stock, and the taxpayer does not adequately identify the lot from which the stock is sold or transferred, the stock sold or transferred is charged against the earliest lot included in the certificate. See paragraphs (c)(2), (c)(3), and (c)(4) of this section for rules on what constitutes an adequate identification.

    (ii) A taxpayer must determine the basis of identical stock (within the meaning of paragraph (e)(4) of this section) by averaging the cost of each share if the stock is purchased at separate times on the same calendar day in executing a single trade order and the broker executing the trade provides a single confirmation that reports an aggregate total cost or an average cost per share. However, the taxpayer may determine the basis of the stock by the actual cost per share if the taxpayer notifies the broker in writing of this intent. The taxpayer must notify the broker by the earlier of the date of the sale of any of the stock for which the taxpayer received the confirmation or one year after the date of the confirmation. A broker may extend the one-year period but the taxpayer must notify the broker no later than the date of sale of any of the stock.

    (2) Identification of stock. An adequate identification is made if it is shown that certificates representing shares of stock from a lot which was purchased or acquired on a certain date or for a certain price were delivered to the taxpayer's transferee. Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (3) or (4) of this paragraph, such stock certificates delivered to the transferee constitute the stock sold or transferred by the taxpayer. Thus, unless the requirements of subparagraph (3) or (4) of this paragraph are met, the stock sold or transferred is charged to the lot to which the certificates delivered to the transferee belong, whether or not the taxpayer intends, or instructs his broker or other agent, to sell or transfer stock from a lot purchased or acquired on a different date or for a different price.

    (3) Identification on confirmation document. (i) Where the stock is left in the custody of a broker or other agent, an adequate identification is made if—

    (a) At the time of the sale or transfer, the taxpayer specifies to such broker or other agent having custody of the stock the particular stock to be sold or transferred, and

    (b) Within a reasonable time thereafter, confirmation of such specification is set forth in a written document from such broker or other agent.

    Stock identified pursuant to this subdivision is the stock sold or transferred by the taxpayer, even though stock certificates from a different lot are delivered to the taxpayer's transferee.

    (ii) Where a single stock certificate represents stock from different lots, where such certificate is held by the taxpayer rather than his broker or other agent, and where the taxpayer sells a part of the stock represented by such certificate through a broker or other agent, an adequate identification is made if—

    (a) At the time of the delivery of the certificate to the broker or other agent, the taxpayer specifies to such broker or other agent the particular stock to be sold or transferred, and

    (b) Within a reasonable time thereafter, confirmation of such specification is set forth in a written document from such broker or agent.

    Where part of the stock represented by a single certificate is sold or transferred directly by the taxpayer to the purchaser or transferee instead of through a broker or other agent, an adequate identification is made if the taxpayer maintains a written record of the particular stock which he intended to sell or transfer.

    (4) Stock held by a trustee, executor, or administrator. (i) A trustee or executor or administrator of an estate holding stock (not left in the custody of a broker) makes an adequate identification if the trustee, executor, or administrator—

    (a) Specifies in writing in the books and records of the trust or estate the particular stock to be sold, transferred, or distributed;

    (b) In the case of a distribution, furnishes the distributee with a written document identifying the particular stock distributed; and

    (c) In the case of a sale or transfer through a broker or other agent, specifies to the broker or agent the particular stock to be sold or transferred, and within a reasonable time thereafter the broker or agent confirms the specification in a written document.

    (ii) The stock the trust or estate identifies under paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section is the stock treated as sold, transferred, or distributed, even if the trustee, executor, or administrator delivers stock certificates from a different lot.

    (5) Subsequent sales. If stock identified under subparagraph (3) or (4) of this paragraph as belonging to a particular lot is sold, transferred, or distributed, the stock so identified shall be deemed to have been sold, transferred, or distributed, and such sale, transfer, or distribution will be taken into consideration in identifying the taxpayer's remaining stock for purposes of subsequent sales, transfers, or distributions.

    (6) Bonds. Paragraphs (1) through (5), (8), and (9) of this section apply to the sale or transfer of bonds.

    (7) Book-entry securities. (i) In applying the provisions of subparagraph (3)(i)(a) of this paragraph in the case of a sale or transfer of a book-entry security (as defined in subdivision (iii) (a) of this subparagraph) which is made after December 31, 1970, pursuant to a written instruction by the taxpayer, a specification by the taxpayer of the unique lot number which he has assigned to the lot which contains the securities being sold or transferred shall constitute specification as required by such subparagraph. The specification of the lot number shall be made either—

    (a) In such written instruction, or

    (b) In the case of a taxpayer in whose name the book entry by the Reserve Bank is made, in a list of lot numbers with respect to all book-entry securities on the books of the Reserve Bank sold or transferred on that date by the taxpayer, provided such list is mailed to or received by the Reserve Bank on or before the Reserve Bank's next business day.

    This subdivision shall apply only if the taxpayer assigns lot numbers in numerical sequence to successive purchases of securities of the same loan title (series) and maturity date, except that securities of the same loan title (series) and maturity date which are purchased at the same price on the same date may be included within the same lot.

    (ii) In applying paragraph (c)(3)(i)(b) of this section to a sale or transfer of a book-entry security pursuant to a taxpayer's written instruction, a confirmation is made by furnishing to the taxpayer a written advice of transaction from the Reserve Bank or other person through whom the taxpayer sells or transfers the securities. The confirmation document must describe the securities and specify the date of the transaction and amount of securities sold or transferred.

    (iii) For purposes of this paragraph (c)(7):

    (a) The term book-entry security means a transferable Treasury bond, note, certificate of indebtedness, or bill issued under the Second Liberty Bond Act (31 U.S.C. 774(2)), as amended, or other security of the United States (as defined in paragraph (c)(7)(iii)(b) of this section) in the form of an entry made as prescribed in 31 CFR Part 306, or other comparable Federal regulations, on the records of a Reserve Bank.

    (b) The term other security of the United States means a bond, note, certificate of indebtedness, bill, debenture, or similar obligation which is subject to the provisions of 31 CFR part 306 or other comparable Federal regulations and which is issued by (1) any department or agency of the Government of the United States, or (2) the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Banks, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the Federal Land Banks, the Federal Intermediate Credit Banks, the Banks for Cooperatives, or the Tennessee Valley Authority;

    (c) The term serially-numbered advice of transaction means the confirmation (prescribed in 31 CFR 306.116) issued by the Reserve Bank which is identifiable by a unique number and indicates that a particular written instruction to the Reserve Bank with respect to the deposit or withdrawal of a specified book-entry security (or securities) has been executed; and

    (d) The term Reserve Bank means a Federal Reserve Bank and its branches acting as Fiscal Agent of the United States.

    (8) Time for making identification. For purposes of this paragraph (c), an adequate identification of stock is made at the time of sale, transfer, delivery, or distribution if the identification is made no later than the earlier of the settlement date or the time for settlement required by Rule 15c6-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 17 CFR 240.15c6-1 (or its successor). A standing order or instruction for the specific identification of stock is treated as an adequate identification made at the time of sale, transfer, delivery, or distribution.

    (9) Method of writing. (i) A written confirmation, record, document, instruction, notification, or advice includes a writing in electronic format.

    (ii) A broker or agent may include the written confirmation required under this paragraph (c) in an account statement or other document the broker or agent periodically provides to the taxpayer if the broker or agent provides the statement or other document within a reasonable time after the sale or transfer.

    (10) Method for determining basis of stock. A method of determining the basis of stock, including a method of identifying stock sold under this paragraph (c) and the average basis method described in paragraph (e) of this section, is not a method of accounting. Therefore, a change in a method of determining the basis of stock is not a change in method of accounting to which sections 446 and 481 apply.

    (11) Effective/applicability date. Paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(7)(ii), (c)(7)(iii)(a), (c)(8), (c)(9), and (c)(10) of this section apply for taxable years beginning after October 18, 2010.

    (d) Obligations issued as part of an investment unit. For purposes of determining the basis of the individual elements of an investment unit (as defined in paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(a) of § 1.1232-3) consisting of an obligation and an option (which is not an excluded option under paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(c) of § 1.1232-3), security, or other property, the cost of such investment unit shall be allocated to such individual elements on the basis of their respective fair market values. In the case of the initial issuance of an investment unit consisting of an obligation and an option, security, or other property, where neither the obligation nor the option, security, or other property has a readily ascertainable fair market value, the portion of the cost of the unit which is allocable to the obligation shall be an amount equal to the issue price of the obligation as determined under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(a) of § 1.1232-3.

    (e) Election to use average basis method—(1) In general. Notwithstanding paragraph (c) of this section, and except as provided in paragraph (e)(8) of this section, a taxpayer may use the average basis method described in paragraph (e)(7) of this section to determine the cost or other basis of identical shares of stock if—

    (i) The taxpayer leaves shares of stock in a regulated investment company (as defined in paragraph (e)(5) of this section) or shares of stock acquired after December 31, 2010, in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan (as defined in paragraph (e)(6) of this section) with a custodian or agent in an account maintained for the acquisition or redemption, sale, or other disposition of shares of the stock; and

    (ii) The taxpayer acquires identical shares of stock at different prices or bases in the account.

    (2) Determination of method. (i) If a taxpayer places shares of stock described in paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section acquired on or after January 1, 2012, in the custody of a broker (as defined by section 6045(c)(1)), including by transfer from an account with another broker, the basis of the shares is determined in accordance with the broker's default method, unless the taxpayer notifies the broker that the taxpayer elects another permitted method. The taxpayer must report gain or loss using the method the taxpayer elects or, if the taxpayer fails to make an election, the broker's default method. See paragraphs (e)(9)(i) and (e)(9)(v), Example 2, of this section.

    (ii) The provisions of this paragraph (e)(2) are illustrated by the following example:

    (3) Shares of stock. For purposes of this paragraph (e), securities issued by unit investment trusts described in paragraph (e)(5) of this section are treated as shares of stock and the term share or shares includes fractions of a share.

    (4) Identical stock. For purposes of this paragraph (e), identical shares of stock means stock with the same Committee on Uniform Security Identification Procedures (CUSIP) number or other security identifier number as permitted in published guidance of general applicability, see § 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter.

    (5) Regulated investment company. (i) For purposes of this paragraph, a regulated investment company means any domestic corporation (other than a personal holding company as defined in section 542) which meets the limitations of section 851(b) and § 1.851-2, and which is registered at all times during the taxable year under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 to 80b-2), either as a management company, or as a unit investment trust.

    (ii) Notwithstanding subdivision (i), this paragraph shall not apply in the case of a unit investment trust unless it is one—

    (a) Substantially all of the assets of which consist (1) of securities issued by a single management company (as defined in such Act) and securities acquired pursuant to subdivision (b) of this subdivision (ii), or (2) securities issued by a single other corporation, and

    (b) Which has no power to invest in any other securities except securities issued by a single other management company, when permitted by such Act or the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    (6) Dividend reinvestment plan—(i) In general. For purposes of this paragraph (e), the term dividend reinvestment plan means any written plan, arrangement, or program under which at least 10 percent of every dividend (within the meaning of section 316) on any share of stock is reinvested in stock identical to the stock on which the dividend is paid. A plan is a dividend reinvestment plan if the plan documents require that at least 10 percent of any dividend paid is reinvested in identical stock even if the plan includes stock on which no dividends have ever been declared or paid or on which an issuer ceases paying dividends. A plan that holds one or more different stocks may permit a taxpayer to reinvest a different percentage of dividends in the stocks held. A dividend reinvestment plan may reinvest other distributions on stock, such as capital gain distributions, non-taxable returns of capital, and cash in lieu of fractional shares. The term dividend reinvestment plan includes both issuer administered dividend reinvestment plans and non-issuer administered dividend reinvestment plans.

    (ii) Acquisition of stock. Stock is acquired in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan if the stock is acquired under that plan, arrangement, or program, or if the dividends and other distributions paid on the stock are subject to that plan, arrangement, or program. Shares of stock acquired in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan include the initial purchase of stock in the dividend reinvestment plan, transfers of identical stock into the dividend reinvestment plan, additional periodic purchases of identical stock in the dividend reinvestment plan, and identical stock acquired through reinvestment of the dividends or other distributions paid on the stock held in the plan.

    (iii) Dividends and other distributions paid after reorganization. For purposes of this paragraph (e)(6), dividends and other distributions declared or announced before or pending a corporate action (such as a merger, consolidation, acquisition, split-off, or spin-off) involving the issuer and subsequently paid and reinvested in shares of stock in the successor entity or entities are treated as reinvested in shares of stock identical to the shares of stock of the issuer.

    (iv) Withdrawal from or termination of plan. If a taxpayer withdraws stock from a dividend reinvestment plan or the plan administrator terminates the dividend reinvestment plan, the shares of identical stock the taxpayer acquires after the withdrawal or termination are not acquired in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan. The taxpayer may not use the average basis method after the withdrawal or termination but may use any other permissible basis determination method. See paragraph (e)(7)(v) of this section for the basis of the shares after withdrawal or termination.

    (7) Computation of average basis—(i) In general. Average basis is determined by averaging the basis of all shares of identical stock in an account regardless of holding period. However, for this purpose, shares of stock in a dividend reinvestment plan are not identical to shares of stock with the same CUSIP number that are not in a dividend reinvestment plan. The basis of each share of identical stock in the account is the aggregate basis of all shares of that stock in the account divided by the aggregate number of shares. Unless a single-account election is in effect, see paragraph (e)(11) of this section, a taxpayer may not average together the basis of identical stock held in separate accounts that the taxpayer sells, exchanges, or otherwise disposes of on or after January 1, 2012.

    (ii) Order of disposition of shares sold or transferred. In the case of the sale or transfer of shares of stock to which the average basis method election applies, shares sold or transferred are deemed to be the shares first acquired. Thus, the first shares sold or transferred are those with a holding period of more than 1 year (long-term shares) to the extent that the account contains long-term shares. If the number of shares sold or transferred exceeds the number of long-term shares in the account, the excess shares sold or transferred are deemed to be shares with a holding period of 1 year or less (short-term shares). Any gain or loss attributable to shares held for more than 1 year constitutes long-term gain or loss, and any gain or loss attributable to shares held for 1 year or less constitutes short-term gain or loss. For example, if a taxpayer sells 50 shares from an account containing 100 long-term shares and 100 short-term shares, the shares sold or transferred are all long-term shares. If, however, the account contains 40 long-term shares and 100 short-term shares, the taxpayer has sold 40 long-term shares and 10 short-term shares.

    (iii) Transition rule from double-category method. This paragraph (e)(7)(iii) applies to stock for which a taxpayer uses the double-category method under § 1.1012-1(e)(3) (April 1, 2010), that the taxpayer acquired before April 1, 2011, and that the taxpayer sells, exchanges, or otherwise disposes of on or after that date. The taxpayer must calculate the average basis of this stock by averaging together all identical shares of stock in the account on April 1, 2011, regardless of holding period.

    (iv) Wash sales. A taxpayer must apply section 1091 and the associated regulations (dealing with wash sales of substantially identical securities) in computing average basis regardless of whether the stock or security sold or otherwise disposed of and the stock acquired are in the same account or in different accounts.

    (v) Basis after change from average basis method. Unless a taxpayer revokes an average basis method election under paragraph (e)(9)(iii) of this section, if a taxpayer changes from the average basis method to another basis determination method (including a change resulting from a withdrawal from or termination of a dividend reinvestment plan), the basis of each share of stock immediately after the change is the same as the basis immediately before the change. See paragraph (e)(9)(iv) of this section for rules for changing from the average basis method.

    (vi) The provisions of this paragraph (e)(7) are illustrated by the following examples:

    (8) Limitation on use of average basis method for certain gift shares. (i) Except as provided in paragraph (e)(8)(ii) of this section, a taxpayer may not use the average basis method for shares of stock a taxpayer acquires by gift after December 31, 1920, if the basis of the shares (adjusted for the period before the date of the gift as provided in section 1016) in the hands of the donor or the last preceding owner by whom the shares were not acquired by gift was greater than the fair market value of the shares at the time of the gift. This paragraph (e)(8)(i) does not apply to shares the taxpayer acquires as a result of a taxable dividend or capital gain distribution on the gift shares.

    (ii) Notwithstanding paragraph (e)(8)(i) of this section, a taxpayer may use the average basis method if the taxpayer states in writing that the taxpayer will treat the basis of the gift shares as the fair market value of the shares at the time the taxpayer acquires the shares. The taxpayer must provide this statement when the taxpayer makes the election under paragraph (e)(9) of this section or when transferring the shares to an account for which the taxpayer has made this election, whichever occurs later. The statement must be effective for any gift shares identical to the gift shares to which the average basis method election applies that the taxpayer acquires at any time and must remain in effect as long as the election remains in effect.

    (iii) The provisions of this paragraph (e)(8) are illustrated by the following examples:

    (9) Time and manner for making the average basis method election—(i) In general. A taxpayer makes an election to use the average basis method for shares of stock described in paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section that are covered securities (within the meaning of section 6045(g)(3)) by notifying the custodian or agent in writing by any reasonable means. For purposes of this paragraph (e), a writing may be in electronic format. A taxpayer has not made an election within the meaning of this section if the taxpayer fails to notify a broker of the taxpayer's basis determination method and basis is determined by the broker's default method under paragraph (e)(2) of this section. A taxpayer may make the average basis method election at any time, effective for sales or other dispositions of stock occurring after the taxpayer notifies the custodian or agent. The election must identify each account with that custodian or agent and each stock in that account to which the election applies. The election may specify that it applies to all accounts with a custodian or agent, including accounts the taxpayer later establishes with the custodian or agent. If the election applies to gift shares, the taxpayer must provide the statement required by paragraph (e)(8)(ii) of this section, if applicable, to the custodian or agent with the taxpayer's election.

    (ii) Average basis method election for securities that are noncovered securities. A taxpayer makes an election to use the average basis method for shares of stock described in paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section that are noncovered securities (as described in § 1.6045-1(a)(16)) on the taxpayer's income tax return for the first taxable year for which the election applies. A taxpayer may make the election on an amended return filed no later than the time prescribed (including extensions) for filing the original return for the taxable year for which the election applies. The taxpayer must indicate on the return that the taxpayer used the average basis method in reporting gain or loss on the sale or other disposition. A taxpayer must attach to the return the statement described in paragraph (e)(8)(ii) of this section, if applicable. A taxpayer making the election must maintain records necessary to substantiate the average basis reported.

    (iii) Revocation of election. A taxpayer may revoke an election under paragraph (e)(9)(i) of this section by the earlier of one year after the taxpayer makes the election or the date of the first sale, transfer, or disposition of that stock following the election. A custodian or agent may extend the one-year period but a taxpayer may not revoke an election after the first sale, transfer, or disposition of the stock. A revocation applies to all stock the taxpayer holds in an account that is identical to the shares of stock for which the taxpayer revokes the election. A revocation is effective when the taxpayer notifies, in writing by any reasonable means, the custodian or agent holding the stock to which the revocation applies. After revocation, the taxpayer's basis in the shares of stock to which the revocation applies is the basis before averaging.

    (iv) Change from average basis method. A taxpayer may change basis determination methods from the average basis method to another method prospectively at any time. A change from the average basis method applies to all identical stock the taxpayer sells or otherwise disposes of before January 1, 2012, that was held in any account. A change from the average basis method applies on an account by account basis (within the meaning of paragraph (e)(10) of this section) to all identical stock the taxpayer sells or otherwise disposes of on or after January 1, 2012. The taxpayer must notify, in writing by any reasonable means, the custodian or agent holding the stock to which the change applies. Unless paragraph (e)(9)(iii) of this section applies, the basis of each share of stock to which the change applies remains the same as the basis immediately before the change. See paragraph (e)(7)(v) of this section.

    (v) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph (e)(9) are illustrated by the following examples:

    (10) Application of average basis method account by account—(i) In general. For sales, exchanges, or other dispositions on or after January 1, 2012, of stock described in paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section, the average basis method applies on an account by account basis. A taxpayer may use the average basis method for stock in a regulated investment company or stock acquired in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan in one account but use a different basis determination method for identical stock in a different account. If a taxpayer uses the average basis method for a stock described in paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section, the taxpayer must use the average basis method for all identical stock within that account. The taxpayer may use different basis determination methods for stock within an account that is not identical. Except as provided in paragraph (e)(10)(ii) of this section, a taxpayer must make separate elections to use the average basis method for stock held in separate accounts.

    (ii) Account rule for stock sold before 2012. A taxpayer's election to use the average basis method for shares of stock described in paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section that a taxpayer sells, exchanges, or otherwise disposes of before January 1, 2012, applies to all identical shares of stock the taxpayer holds in any account.

    (iii) Separate account. Unless the single-account election described in paragraph (e)(11)(i) of this section applies, stock described in paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section that is a covered security (within the meaning of section 6045(g)(3)) is treated as held in a separate account from stock that is a noncovered security (as described in § 1.6045-1(a)(16)), regardless of when acquired.

    (iv) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph (e)(10) are illustrated by the following examples:

    (11) Single-account election—(i) In general. Paragraph (e)(10)(iii) of this section does not apply if a regulated investment company or dividend reinvestment plan elects to treat all identical shares of stock described in paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section as held in a single account (single-account election). The single-account election applies only to stock for which a taxpayer elects to use the average basis method that is held in separate accounts or treated as held in separate accounts maintained for the taxpayer and only to accounts with the same ownership. If a broker (as defined by section 6045(c)(1)) holds the stock as a nominee, the broker, and not the regulated investment company or dividend reinvestment plan, makes the election. The single-account election is irrevocable, but is void if the taxpayer revokes the average basis election under paragraph (e)(9)(iii) of this section.

    (ii) Scope of election. A company, plan, or broker may make a single-account election for one or more taxpayers for which it maintains an account, and for one or more stocks it holds for a taxpayer. The company, plan, or broker may make the election only for the shares of stock for which it has accurate basis information. A company, plan, or broker has accurate basis information if the company, plan, or broker neither knows nor has reason to know that the basis information is inaccurate. See also section 6724 and the associated regulations regarding standards for relief from information reporting penalties. Stock for which accurate basis information is unavailable may not be included in the single-account election and must be treated as held in a separate account.

    (iii) Effect of single-account election. If a company, plan, or broker makes the single-account election, the basis of all identical shares of stock to which the election applies must be averaged together regardless of when the taxpayer acquires the shares, and all the shares are treated as covered securities. The single-account election applies to all identical stock a taxpayer later acquires in the account that is a covered security (within the meaning of section 6045(g)(3)). A company, plan, or broker may make another single-account election if, for example, the broker later acquires accurate basis information for a stock, or a taxpayer acquires identical stock in the account that is a noncovered security (as described in § 1.6045-1(a)(16)) for which the company, plan, or broker has accurate basis information.

    (iv) Time and manner for making the single-account election. A company, plan, or broker makes the single-account election by clearly noting it on its books and records. The books and records must reflect the date of the election; the taxpayer's name, account number, and taxpayer identification number; the stock subject to the election; and the taxpayer's basis in the stock. The company, plan, or broker must provide copies of the books and records regarding the election to the taxpayer upon request. A company, plan, or broker may make the single-account election at any time.

    (v) Notification to taxpayer. A company, plan, or broker making the single-account election must use reasonable means to notify the taxpayer of the election. Reasonable means include mailings, circulars, or electronic mail sent separately to the taxpayer or included with the taxpayer's account statement, or other means reasonably calculated to provide actual notice to the taxpayer. The notice must identify the securities subject to the election and advise the taxpayer that the securities will be treated as covered securities regardless of when acquired.

    (vi) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph (e)(11) are illustrated by the following examples:

    (12) Effective/applicability date. Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(7), (e)(9), and (e)(10) of this section, this paragraph (e) applies for taxable years beginning after October 18, 2010.

    (f) Special rules. For special rules for determining the basis for gain or loss in the case of certain vessels acquired through the Maritime Commission (or its successors) or pursuant to an agreement with the Secretary of Commerce, see sections 510, 511, and 607 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended (46 U.S.C. 1160, 1161) and parts 2 and 3 of this chapter. For special rules for determining the unadjusted basis of property recovered in respect of war losses, see section 1336. For special rules with respect to taxable years beginning before January 1, 1964, for determining the basis for gain or loss in the case of a disposition of a share of stock acquired pursuant to the timely exercise of a restricted stock option where the option price was between 85 percent and 95 percent of the fair market value of the stock at the time the option was granted, see paragraph (b) of § 1.421-5. See section 423(c)(1) or 424(c)(1), whichever is applicable, for special rules with respect to taxable years ending after December 31, 1963, for determining the basis for gain or loss in the case of the disposition of a share of stock acquired pursuant to the timely exercise of a stock option described in such sections. See section 422(c)(1) for special rules with respect to taxable years ending after December 31, 1963, for determining the basis for gain or loss in the case of an exercise of a qualified stock option.

    (g) Debt instruments issued in exchange for property—(1) In general. For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, if a debt instrument is issued in exchange for property, the cost of the property that is attributable to the debt instrument is the issue price of the debt instrument as determined under § 1.1273-2 or § 1.1274-2, whichever is applicable. If, however, the issue price of the debt instrument is determined under section 1273(b)(4), the cost of the property attributable to the debt instrument is its stated principal amount reduced by any unstated interest (as determined under section 483).

    (2) Certain tax-exempt obligations. This paragraph (g)(2) applies to a tax-exempt obligation (as defined in section 1275(a)(3)) that is issued in exchange for property and that has an issue price determined under § 1.1274-2(j) (concerning tax-exempt contingent payment obligations and certain tax-exempt variable rate debt instruments subject to section 1274). Notwithstanding paragraph (g)(1) of this section, if this paragraph (g)(2) applies to a tax-exempt obligation, for purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the cost of the property that is attributable to the obligation is the sum of the present values of the noncontingent payments (as determined under § 1.1274-2(c)).

    (3) Effective date. This paragraph (g) applies to sales or exchanges that occur on or after August 13, 1996.

    (h) Determination of basis of digital assets—(1) Overview and general rule. This paragraph (h) provides rules to determine the basis of digital assets, as defined in § 1.6045-1(a)(19) other than a digital asset not required to be reported as a digital asset pursuant to § 1.6045-1(c)(8)(ii), (iii), or (iv), received in a purchase for cash, a transfer in connection with the performance of services, an exchange for digital assets or other property differing materially in kind or in extent, an exchange for a debt instrument described in paragraph (h)(1)(v) of this section, or in a part sale and part gift transfer described in paragraph (h)(1)(vi) of this section. Except as provided in paragraph (h)(1)(ii), (v), and (vi) of this section, the basis of digital assets received in a purchase or exchange is generally equal to the cost thereof at the date and time of the purchase or exchange, plus any allocable digital asset transaction costs as determined under paragraph (h)(2)(ii) of this section.

    (i) Basis of digital assets purchased for cash. The basis of digital assets purchased for cash is the amount of cash used to purchase the digital assets plus any allocable digital asset transaction costs as determined under paragraph (h)(2)(ii)(A) of this section.

    (ii) Basis of digital assets received in connection with the performance of services. For rules regarding digital assets received in connection with the performance of services, see §§ 1.61-2(d)(2) and 1.83-4(b).

    (iii) Basis of digital assets received in exchange for property other than digital assets. The basis of digital assets received in exchange for property differing materially in kind or in extent, other than digital assets or debt instruments described in paragraph (h)(1)(v) of this section, is the cost as described in paragraph (h)(3) of this section of the digital assets received plus any allocable digital asset transaction costs as determined under paragraph (h)(2)(ii)(A) of this section.

    (iv) Basis of digital assets received in exchange for other digital assets. The basis of digital assets received in an exchange for other digital assets differing materially in kind or in extent is the cost as described in paragraph (h)(3) of this section of the digital assets received.

    (v) Basis of digital assets received in exchange for the issuance of a debt instrument. If a debt instrument is issued in exchange for digital assets, the cost of the digital assets attributable to the debt instrument is the amount determined under paragraph (g) of this section, plus any allocable digital asset transaction costs as determined under paragraph (h)(2)(ii)(A) of this section.

    (vi) Basis of digital assets received in a part sale and part gift transfer. To the extent digital assets are received in a transfer, which is in part a sale and in part a gift, see § 1.1012-2.

    (2) Digital asset transaction costs—(i) Definition. The term digital asset transaction costs under this paragraph (h) has the same meaning as in § 1.1001-7(b)(2)(i).

    (ii) Allocation of digital asset transaction costs. This paragraph (h)(2)(ii) provides the rules for allocating digital asset transaction costs, as defined in paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this section, for transactions described in paragraph (h)(1) of this section. Any other allocation or specific assignment of digital asset transaction costs is disregarded.

    (A) Allocation of digital asset transaction costs on a purchase or exchange for digital assets. Except as provided in paragraphs (h)(2)(ii)(B) and (C) of this section, the total digital asset transaction costs paid by the taxpayer in connection with an acquisition of digital assets are allocable to the digital assets received.

    (B) Special rule for the allocation of digital asset transaction costs paid to effect an exchange of digital assets for other digital assets. Except as provided in paragraph (h)(2)(ii)(C) of this section, the total digital asset transaction costs paid by the taxpayer, to effect an exchange described in paragraph (h)(1)(iv) of this section are allocable exclusively to the disposition of the transferred digital assets.

    (C) Special rule for allocating certain cascading digital asset transaction costs. This paragraph (h)(2)(ii)(C) provides a special rule for an exchange described in paragraph (h)(1)(iv) of this section (original transaction) and for which digital assets are withheld from digital assets acquired in the original transaction to pay the digital asset transaction costs to effect the original transaction. The total digital asset transaction costs paid by the taxpayer, to effect both the original transaction and any disposition of the withheld digital assets, are allocable exclusively to the disposition of digital assets in the original transaction.

    (3) Determining the cost of the digital assets received. In the case of an exchange described in either paragraph (h)(1)(iii) or (iv) of this section, the cost of the digital assets received is the same as the fair market value used in determining the amount realized on the sale or disposition of the transferred property for purposes of section 1001 of the Code. Generally, the cost of a digital asset received is determined at the date and time of the exchange. The special rule in § 1.1001-7(b)(4) also applies in this section for purposes of determining the fair market value of a received digital asset when it cannot be determined with reasonable accuracy.

    (4) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of paragraphs (h)(1) through (3) of this section. Unless the facts specifically state otherwise, the transactions described in the following examples occur after the applicability date set forth in paragraph (h)(5) of this section. For purposes of the examples under this paragraph (h)(4), assume that TP is a digital asset investor, and that digital assets A, B, and C are materially different in kind or in extent from each other. See § 1.1001-7(b)(5) for examples illustrating the determination of the amount realized and gain or loss in a sale or disposition of a digital asset for cash, other property differing materially in kind or in extent, or services.

    (i) Example 1: Transaction fee paid in cash—(A) Facts. TP uses BEX, an unrelated third party, to exchange 10 units of digital asset A for 20 units of digital asset B. At the time of the exchange, a unit of digital asset A has a fair market value of $2, and a unit of digital asset B has a fair market value of $1. BEX charges TP a transaction fee of $2, which TP pays to BEX in cash at the time of the exchange.

    (B) Analysis. Under paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this section, TP has digital asset transaction costs of $2. Under paragraph (h)(2)(ii)(B) of this section, TP allocates the digital asset transaction costs ($2) to the disposition of the 10 units of digital asset A. Under paragraphs (h)(1)(iv) and (h)(3) of this section, TP's basis in the 20 units of digital asset B received is $20, which is the sum of the fair market value of the 20 units of digital asset B received ($20).

    (ii) Example 2: Transaction fee paid in other property—(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (h)(4)(i)(A) of this section (the facts in Example 1), except that BEX requires its customers to pay transaction fees using units of digital asset C. TP pays the transaction fees using 2 units of digital asset C that TP holds. At the time TP pays the transaction fees, each unit of digital asset C has a fair market value of $1. TP acquires 20 units of digital asset B with a fair market value of $20 in the exchange.

    (B) Analysis. Under paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this section, TP has digital asset transaction costs of $2. Under paragraph (h)(2)(ii)(B) of this section, TP must allocate the digital asset transaction costs ($2) to the disposition of the 10 units of digital asset A. Under paragraphs (h)(1)(iv) and (h)(3) of this section, TP's basis in the 20 units of digital asset B is $20, which is the sum of the fair market value of the 20 units of digital asset B received ($20).

    (iii) Example 3: Digital asset transaction costs withheld from the transferred digital assets—(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (h)(4)(i)(A) of this section (the facts in Example 1), except that BEX withholds 1 unit of digital asset A in payment of the transaction fees and TP receives 18 units of digital asset B.

    (B) Analysis. Under paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this section, TP has digital asset transaction costs of $2. Under paragraph (h)(2)(ii)(B) of this section, TP must allocate the digital asset transaction costs ($2) to the disposition of the 10 units of digital asset A. Under paragraphs (h)(1)(iv) and (h)(3) of this section, TP's total basis in the digital asset B units is $18, which is the sum of the fair market value of the 18 units of digital asset B received ($18).

    (5) Applicability date. This paragraph (h) is applicable to all acquisitions and dispositions of digital assets on or after January 1, 2025.

    (i) [Reserved]

    (j) Sale, disposition, or transfer of digital assets. Paragraphs (j)(1) and (2) of this section apply to digital assets not held in the custody of a broker, such as digital assets that are held in an unhosted wallet. Paragraph (j)(3) of this section applies to digital assets held in the custody of a broker. For the definitions of the terms wallet, hosted wallet, unhosted wallet, and held in a wallet or account, as used in this paragraph (j), see § 1.6045-1(a)(25)(i) through (iv). For the definition of the term broker, see § 1.6045-1(a)(1). For the definition of the term digital asset, see § 1.6045-1(a)(19); however, a digital asset not required to be reported as a digital asset pursuant to § 1.6045-1(c)(8)(ii), (iii), or (iv) is not subject to the rules of this section.

    (1) Digital assets not held in the custody of a broker. If a taxpayer sells, disposes of, or transfers less than all units of the same digital asset not held in the custody of the broker, such as in a single unhosted wallet or in a hosted wallet provided by a person other than a broker, the basis and holding period of the units sold, disposed of, or transferred are determined by making a specific identification of the units in the wallet that are sold, disposed of, or transferred, as provided in paragraph (j)(2) of this section. If a specific identification is not made, the basis and holding period of the units sold, disposed of, or transferred are determined by treating the units not held in the custody of a broker as sold, disposed of, or transferred in order of time from the earliest date on which units of the same digital asset not held in the custody of a broker were acquired by the taxpayer. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the date any units were transferred into the taxpayer's wallet is disregarded.

    (2) Specific identification of digital assets not held in the custody of a broker. A specific identification of the units of a digital asset sold, disposed of, or transferred is made if, no later than the date and time of the sale, disposition, or transfer, the taxpayer identifies on its books and records the particular units to be sold, disposed of, or transferred by reference to any identifier, such as purchase date and time or the purchase price for the unit, that is sufficient to identify the units sold, disposed of, or transferred. A specific identification can be made only if adequate records are maintained for the unit of a specific digital asset not held in the custody of a broker to establish that a unit sold, disposed of, or transferred is removed from the wallet.

    (3) Digital assets held in the custody of a broker. This paragraph (j)(3) applies to digital assets held in the custody of a broker.

    (i) Unit of a digital asset sold, disposed of, or transferred. Except as provided in paragraph (j)(3)(iii) of this section, where multiple units of the same digital asset are held in the custody of a broker, as defined in § 1.6045-1(a)(1), and the taxpayer does not provide the broker with an adequate identification of which units are sold, disposed of, or transferred by the date and time of the sale, disposition, or transfer, as provided in paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of this section, the basis and holding period of the units sold, disposed of, or transferred are determined by treating the units held in the custody of the broker as sold, disposed of, or transferred in order of time from the earliest date on which units of the same digital asset held in the custody of a broker were acquired by the taxpayer. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the date any units were transferred into the custody of the broker is disregarded.

    (ii) Adequate identification of units held in the custody of a broker. Except as provided in paragraph (j)(3)(iii) of this section, where multiple units of the same digital asset are held in the custody of a broker, as defined in § 1.6045-1(a)(1), an adequate identification occurs if, no later than the date and time of the sale, disposition, or transfer, the taxpayer specifies to the broker having custody of the digital assets the particular units of the digital asset to be sold, disposed of, or transferred by reference to any identifier, such as purchase date and time or purchase price, that the broker designates as sufficiently specific to identify the units sold, disposed of, or transferred. The taxpayer is responsible for maintaining records to substantiate the identification. A standing order or instruction for the specific identification of digital assets is treated as an adequate identification made at the time of sale, disposition, or transfer. In addition, a taxpayer's election to use average basis for a covered security for which average basis reporting is permitted and that is also a digital asset is also an adequate identification. In the case of a broker offering only one method of making a specific identification, such method is treated as a standing order or instruction.

    (iii) Special rule for the identification of certain units withheld. Notwithstanding paragraph (j)(3)(i) or (ii) of this section, in the case of a transaction described in paragraph (h)(1)(iv) of this section (digital assets exchanged for different digital assets) and for which the broker withholds units of the same digital asset received for either the broker's backup withholding obligations under section 3406 of the Code, or for payment of services described in § 1.1001-7(b)(1)(ii) (digital asset transaction costs), the taxpayer is deemed to have made an adequate identification, within the meaning of paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of this section, for such withheld units regardless of any other adequate identification within the meaning of paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of this section designating other units of the same digital asset as the units sold, disposed of, or transferred.

    (4) Method for specifically identifying units of a digital asset. A method of specifically identifying the units of a digital asset sold, disposed of, or transferred under this paragraph (j), for example, by the earliest acquired, the latest acquired, or the highest basis, is not a method of accounting. Therefore, a change in the method of specifically identifying the digital asset sold, disposed of, or transferred, for example, from the earliest acquired to the latest acquired, is not a change in method of accounting to which sections 446 and 481 of the Code apply.

    (5) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of paragraphs (j)(1) through (j)(3) of this section. Unless the facts specifically state otherwise, the transactions described in the following examples occur after the applicability date set forth in paragraph (j)(6) of this section. For purposes of the examples under this paragraph (j)(5), assume that TP is a digital asset investor and that the units of digital assets in the examples are the only digital assets owned by TP.

    (i) Example 1: Identification of digital assets not held in the custody of a broker—(A) Facts. On September 1, Year 2, TP transfers two lots of digital asset DE to a new digital asset address generated and controlled by an unhosted wallet, as defined in § 1.6045-1(a)(25)(iii). The first lot transferred into TP's wallet consists of 10 units of digital asset DE, with a purchase date of January 1, Year 1, and a basis of $2 per unit. The second lot transferred into TP's wallet consists of 20 units of digital asset DE, with a purchase date of January 1, Year 2, and a basis of $5 per unit. On September 2, Year 2, when the DE units have a fair market value of $10 per unit, TP purchases $100 worth of consumer goods from Merchant M. To make payment, TP transfers 10 units of digital asset DE from TP's wallet to CPP, a processor of digital asset payments as defined in § 1.6045-1(a)(22), that then pays $100 to M, in a transaction treated as a sale by TP of the 10 units of digital asset DE. Prior to making the transfer to CPP, TP keeps a record that the 10 units of DE sold in this transaction were from the second lot of units transferred into TP's wallet.

    (B) Analysis. Under the facts in paragraph (j)(5)(i)(A) of this section, TP's notation in its records on the date of sale, prior to the time of the sale, specifying that the 10 units sold were from the 20 units TP acquired on January 1, Year 2, is a specific identification within the meaning of paragraph (j)(2) of this section. TP's notation is sufficient to identify the 10 units of digital asset DE sold. Accordingly, TP has identified the units disposed of for purposes of determining the basis ($5 per unit) and holding period (one year or less) of the units sold in order to purchase the merchandise.

    (ii) Example 2: Identification of digital assets not held in the custody of a broker—(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (j)(5)(i)(A) of this section (the facts in Example 1), except in making the transfer to CPP, TP did not keep a record at or prior to the time of the sale of the specific 10 units of digital asset DE that TP intended to sell.

    (B) Analysis. TP did not make a specific identification within the meaning of paragraph (j)(2) of this section for the 10 units of digital asset DE that were sold. Pursuant to the ordering rule provided in paragraph (j)(1) of this section, the units disposed of are determined by treating the units held in the unhosted wallet as disposed of in order of time from the earliest date on which units of the same digital asset held in the unhosted wallet were acquired by the taxpayer. Accordingly, TP must treat the 10 units sold as the 10 units with a purchase date of January 1, Year 1, and a basis of $2 per unit, transferred into the wallet.

    (iii) Example 3: Identification of digital assets held in the custody of a broker—(A) Facts. On August 1, Year 1, TP opens a custodial account at CRX, a broker within the meaning of § 1.6045-1(a)(1), and purchases through CRX 10 units of digital asset DE for $9 per unit. On January 1, Year 2, TP opens a custodial account at BEX, an unrelated broker, and purchases through BEX 20 units of digital asset DE for $5 per unit. On August 1, Year 3, TP transfers the digital assets TP holds with CRX into TP's custodial account with BEX. BEX has a policy that purchase or transfer date and time, if necessary, is a sufficiently specific identifier for customers to determine the units sold, disposed of, or transferred. On September 1, Year 3, TP directs BEX to sell 10 units of digital asset DE for $10 per unit and specifies that BEX sell the units that were purchased on January 1, Year 2. BEX effects the sale.

    (B) Analysis. No later than the date and time of the sale, TP specified to BEX the particular units of digital assets to be sold. Accordingly, under paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of this section, TP provided an adequate identification of the 10 units of digital asset DE sold. Accordingly, the 10 units of digital asset DE that TP sold are the 10 units that TP purchased on January 1, Year 2.

    (iv) Example 4: Identification of digital assets held in the custody of a broker—(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (j)(5)(iii)(A) of this section (the facts in Example 3) except that TP directs BEX to sell 10 units of digital asset DE but does not make any identification of which units to sell. Additionally, TP does not provide purchase date information to BEX with respect to the units transferred into TP's account with BEX.

    (B) Analysis. Because TP did not specify to BEX no later than the date and time of the sale the particular units of digital assets to be sold, TP did not make an adequate identification within the meaning of paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of this section. Thus, the ordering rule provided in paragraph (j)(3)(i) of this section applies to determine the units of digital asset DE sold. Pursuant to this rule, the units sold must be determined by treating the units held in the custody of the broker as disposed of in order of time from the earliest date on which units of the same digital asset held in the custody of a broker were acquired by the taxpayer. The 10 units of digital asset DE sold must be attributed to the 10 units of digital asset DE acquired on August 1, Year 1, which are the earliest units of digital asset DE acquired by TP that are held in TP's account with BEX. In addition, because TP did not provide to BEX customer-provided acquisition information as defined in § 1.6045-1(d)(2)(ii)(B)(4) with respect to the units transferred into TP's account with BEX (or adopt a standing order to follow the ordering rule applicable to BEX under § 1.6045-1(d)(2)(ii)(B)(2)), the units determined as sold by BEX under § 1.6045-1(d)(2)(ii)(B)(1) and that BEX will report as sold under § 1.6045-1 are not the same units that TP must treat as sold under this section. See § 1.6045-1(d)(2)(vii)(C) (Example 3).

    (v) Example 5: Identification of the digital asset used to pay certain digital asset transaction costs—(A) Facts. On January 1, Year 1, TP purchases 10 units of digital asset AB and 30 units of digital asset CD in a custodial account with DRX, a broker within the meaning of § 1.6045-1(a)(1). DRX has a policy that purchase or transfer date and time, if necessary, is a sufficiently specific identifier by which its customers may identify the units sold, disposed of, or transferred. On June 30, Year 2, TP directs DRX to purchase 10 additional units of digital asset AB with 10 units of digital asset CD. DRX withholds one unit of the digital asset AB received for transaction fees. TP does not make any identification of the 1 unit of digital asset AB withheld by DRX. TP engages in no other transactions.

    (B) Analysis. DRX's withholding of 1 unit of digital asset AB from the 10 units acquired by TP is a disposition by TP of the 1 unit as of June 30, Year 2. See §§ 1.1001-7 and 1.1012-1(h) for determining the amount realized and basis of the disposed unit, respectively. Despite TP not making an adequate identification, within the meaning of paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of this section to DRX of the 1 unit withheld, under the special rule of paragraph (j)(3)(iii) of this section, the withheld unit of AB must be attributed to the units of AB acquired on June 30, Year 2 and held in TP's account with DRX.

    (vi) Example 6: Identification of the digital asset used to pay certain digital asset transaction costs—(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (j)(5)(v)(A) of this section (the facts in Example 5) except that TP has a standing order with BEX to treat the earliest unit purchased in TP's account as the unit sold, disposed of, or transferred.

    (B) Analysis. The transaction is an exchange of digital assets for different digital assets and for which the broker withholds units of the same digital asset received in order to pay digital asset transaction costs. Accordingly, although TP's standing order to treat the earliest unit purchased in TP's account (that is, the units purchased by TP on January 1, Year 1) as the units sold is an adequate identification under paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of this section, TP is deemed to have made an adequate identification for such withheld units pursuant to paragraph (j)(3)(iii) of this section regardless of TP's adequate identification designating other units as the units sold. Thus, the results are the same as provided in paragraph (j)(5)(v)(B) of this section (the analysis in Example 5).

    (6) Applicability date. This paragraph (j) is applicable to all acquisitions and dispositions of digital assets on or after January 1, 2025.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1012-1(a)§1.1012-1(a) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Substantially all of the assets of which consist (1) of securities issued by a single management company (as defined in such Act) and securities acquired pursuant to subdivision (b) of this subdivision (ii), or (2) securities issued by a single other corporation, and

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1012-1(b)Which has no power to invest in any other securities except securities issued by a single other management company, when permitted by such Act or the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Which has no power to invest in any other securities except securities issued by a single other management company, when permitted by such Act or the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    (6) Dividend reinvestment plan—(i) In general. For purposes of this paragraph (e), the term dividend reinvestment plan means any written plan, arrangement, or program under which at least 10 percent of every dividend (within the meaning of section 316) on any share of stock is reinvested in stock identical to the stock on which the dividend is paid. A plan is a dividend reinvestment plan if the plan documents require that at least 10 percent of any dividend paid is reinvested in identical stock even if the plan includes stock on which no dividends have ever been declared or paid or on which an issuer ceases paying dividends. A plan that holds one or more different stocks may permit a taxpayer to reinvest a different percentage of dividends in the stocks held. A dividend reinvestment plan may reinvest other distributions on stock, such as capital gain distributions, non-taxable returns of capital, and cash in lieu of fractional shares. The term dividend reinvestment plan includes both issuer administered dividend reinvestment plans and non-issuer administered dividend reinvestment plans.

    (ii) Acquisition of stock. Stock is acquired in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan if the stock is acquired under that plan, arrangement, or program, or if the dividends and other distributions paid on the stock are subject to that plan, arrangement, or program. Shares of stock acquired in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan include the initial purchase of stock in the dividend reinvestment plan, transfers of identical stock into the dividend reinvestment plan, additional periodic purchases of identical stock in the dividend reinvestment plan, and identical stock acquired through reinvestment of the dividends or other distributions paid on the stock held in the plan.

    (iii) Dividends and other distributions paid after reorganization. For purposes of this paragraph (e)(6), dividends and other distributions declared or announced before or pending a corporate action (such as a merger, consolidation, acquisition, split-off, or spin-off) involving the issuer and subsequently paid and reinvested in shares of stock in the successor entity or entities are treated as reinvested in shares of stock identical to the shares of stock of the issuer.

    (iv) Withdrawal from or termination of plan. If a taxpayer withdraws stock from a dividend reinvestment plan or the plan administrator terminates the dividend reinvestment plan, the shares of identical stock the taxpayer acquires after the withdrawal or termination are not acquired in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan. The taxpayer may not use the average basis method after the withdrawal or termination but may use any other permissible basis determination method. See paragraph (e)(7)(v) of this section for the basis of the shares after withdrawal or termination.

    (7) Computation of average basis—(i) In general. Average basis is determined by averaging the basis of all shares of identical stock in an account regardless of holding period. However, for this purpose, shares of stock in a dividend reinvestment plan are not identical to shares of stock with the same CUSIP number that are not in a dividend reinvestment plan. The basis of each share of identical stock in the account is the aggregate basis of all shares of that stock in the account divided by the aggregate number of shares. Unless a single-account election is in effect, see paragraph (e)(11) of this section, a taxpayer may not average together the basis of identical stock held in separate accounts that the taxpayer sells, exchanges, or otherwise disposes of on or after January 1, 2012.

    (ii) Order of disposition of shares sold or transferred. In the case of the sale or transfer of shares of stock to which the average basis method election applies, shares sold or transferred are deemed to be the shares first acquired. Thus, the first shares sold or transferred are those with a holding period of more than 1 year (long-term shares) to the extent that the account contains long-term shares. If the number of shares sold or transferred exceeds the number of long-term shares in the account, the excess shares sold or transferred are deemed to be shares with a holding period of 1 year or less (short-term shares). Any gain or loss attributable to shares held for more than 1 year constitutes long-term gain or loss, and any gain or loss attributable to shares held for 1 year or less constitutes short-term gain or loss. For example, if a taxpayer sells 50 shares from an account containing 100 long-term shares and 100 short-term shares, the shares sold or transferred are all long-term shares. If, however, the account contains 40 long-term shares and 100 short-term shares, the taxpayer has sold 40 long-term shares and 10 short-term shares.

    (iii) Transition rule from double-category method. This paragraph (e)(7)(iii) applies to stock for which a taxpayer uses the double-category method under § 1.1012-1(e)(3) (April 1, 2010), that the taxpayer acquired before April 1, 2011, and that the taxpayer sells, exchanges, or otherwise disposes of on or after that date. The taxpayer must calculate the average basis of this stock by averaging together all identical shares of stock in the account on April 1, 2011, regardless of holding period.

    (iv) Wash sales. A taxpayer must apply section 1091 and the associated regulations (dealing with wash sales of substantially identical securities) in computing average basis regardless of whether the stock or security sold or otherwise disposed of and the stock acquired are in the same account or in different accounts.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1012-1(c)The term serially-numbered advice of transaction means the confirmation (prescribed in 31 CFR 306. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    The term serially-numbered advice of transaction means the confirmation (prescribed in 31 CFR 306.116) issued by the Reserve Bank which is identifiable by a unique number and indicates that a particular written instruction to the Reserve Bank with respect to the deposit or withdrawal of a specified book-entry security (or securities) has been executed; and

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1012-1(d)Obligations issued as part of an investment unit. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Obligations issued as part of an investment unit. For purposes of determining the basis of the individual elements of an investment unit (as defined in paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(a) of § 1.1232-3) consisting of an obligation and an option (which is not an excluded option under paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(c) of § 1.1232-3), security, or other property, the cost of such investment unit shall be allocated to such individual elements on the basis of their respective fair market values. In the case of the initial issuance of an investment unit consisting of an obligation and an option, security, or other property, where neither the obligation nor the option, security, or other property has a readily ascertainable fair market value, the portion of the cost of the unit which is allocable to the obligation shall be an amount equal to the issue price of the obligation as determined under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(a) of § 1.1232-3.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1012-1(e)Election to use average basis method—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Election to use average basis method—(1) In general. Notwithstanding paragraph (c) of this section, and except as provided in paragraph (e)(8) of this section, a taxpayer may use the average basis method described in paragraph (e)(7) of this section to determine the cost or other basis of identical shares of stock if—

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1012-1(f)Special rules. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Special rules. For special rules for determining the basis for gain or loss in the case of certain vessels acquired through the Maritime Commission (or its successors) or pursuant to an agreement with the Secretary of Commerce, see sections 510, 511, and 607 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended (46 U.S.C. 1160, 1161) and parts 2 and 3 of this chapter. For special rules for determining the unadjusted basis of property recovered in respect of war losses, see section 1336. For special rules with respect to taxable years beginning before January 1, 1964, for determining the basis for gain or loss in the case of a disposition of a share of stock acquired pursuant to the timely exercise of a restricted stock option where the option price was between 85 percent and 95 percent of the fair market value of the stock at the time the option was granted, see paragraph (b) of § 1.421-5. See section 423(c)(1) or 424(c)(1), whichever is applicable, for special rules with respect to taxable years ending after December 31, 1963, for determining the basis for gain or loss in the case of the disposition of a share of stock acquired pursuant to the timely exercise of a stock option described in such sections. See section 422(c)(1) for special rules with respect to taxable years ending after December 31, 1963, for determining the basis for gain or loss in the case of an exercise of a qualified stock option.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1012-1(g)Debt instruments issued in exchange for property—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Debt instruments issued in exchange for property—(1) In general. For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, if a debt instrument is issued in exchange for property, the cost of the property that is attributable to the debt instrument is the issue price of the debt instrument as determined under § 1.1273-2 or § 1.1274-2, whichever is applicable. If, however, the issue price of the debt instrument is determined under section 1273(b)(4), the cost of the property attributable to the debt instrument is its stated principal amount reduced by any unstated interest (as determined under section 483).

    (2) Certain tax-exempt obligations. This paragraph (g)(2) applies to a tax-exempt obligation (as defined in section 1275(a)(3)) that is issued in exchange for property and that has an issue price determined under § 1.1274-2(j) (concerning tax-exempt contingent payment obligations and certain tax-exempt variable rate debt instruments subject to section 1274). Notwithstanding paragraph (g)(1) of this section, if this paragraph (g)(2) applies to a tax-exempt obligation, for purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the cost of the property that is attributable to the obligation is the sum of the present values of the noncontingent payments (as determined under § 1.1274-2(c)).

    (3) Effective date. This paragraph (g) applies to sales or exchanges that occur on or after August 13, 1996.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1012-1(h)Determination of basis of digital assets—(1) Overview and general rule. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Determination of basis of digital assets—(1) Overview and general rule. This paragraph (h) provides rules to determine the basis of digital assets, as defined in § 1.6045-1(a)(19) other than a digital asset not required to be reported as a digital asset pursuant to § 1.6045-1(c)(8)(ii), (iii), or (iv), received in a purchase for cash, a transfer in connection with the performance of services, an exchange for digital assets or other property differing materially in kind or in extent, an exchange for a debt instrument described in paragraph (h)(1)(v) of this section, or in a part sale and part gift transfer described in paragraph (h)(1)(vi) of this section. Except as provided in paragraph (h)(1)(ii), (v), and (vi) of this section, the basis of digital assets received in a purchase or exchange is generally equal to the cost thereof at the date and time of the purchase or exchange, plus any allocable digital asset transaction costs as determined under paragraph (h)(2)(ii) of this section.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1012-1(i)Example 1: Identification of digital assets not held in the custody of a broker—(A) Facts. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Example 1: Identification of digital assets not held in the custody of a broker—(A) Facts. On September 1, Year 2, TP transfers two lots of digital asset DE to a new digital asset address generated and controlled by an unhosted wallet, as defined in § 1.6045-1(a)(25)(iii). The first lot transferred into TP's wallet consists of 10 units of digital asset DE, with a purchase date of January 1, Year 1, and a basis of $2 per unit. The second lot transferred into TP's wallet consists of 20 units of digital asset DE, with a purchase date of January 1, Year 2, and a basis of $5 per unit. On September 2, Year 2, when the DE units have a fair market value of $10 per unit, TP purchases $100 worth of consumer goods from Merchant M. To make payment, TP transfers 10 units of digital asset DE from TP's wallet to CPP, a processor of digital asset payments as defined in § 1.6045-1(a)(22), that then pays $100 to M, in a transaction treated as a sale by TP of the 10 units of digital asset DE. Prior to making the transfer to CPP, TP keeps a record that the 10 units of DE sold in this transaction were from the second lot of units transferred into TP's wallet.

    (B) Analysis. Under the facts in paragraph (j)(5)(i)(A) of this section, TP's notation in its records on the date of sale, prior to the time of the sale, specifying that the 10 units sold were from the 20 units TP acquired on January 1, Year 2, is a specific identification within the meaning of paragraph (j)(2) of this section. TP's notation is sufficient to identify the 10 units of digital asset DE sold. Accordingly, TP has identified the units disposed of for purposes of determining the basis ($5 per unit) and holding period (one year or less) of the units sold in order to purchase the merchandise.

    (ii) Example 2: Identification of digital assets not held in the custody of a broker—(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (j)(5)(i)(A) of this section (the facts in Example 1), except in making the transfer to CPP, TP did not keep a record at or prior to the time of the sale of the specific 10 units of digital asset DE that TP intended to sell.

    (B) Analysis. TP did not make a specific identification within the meaning of paragraph (j)(2) of this section for the 10 units of digital asset DE that were sold. Pursuant to the ordering rule provided in paragraph (j)(1) of this section, the units disposed of are determined by treating the units held in the unhosted wallet as disposed of in order of time from the earliest date on which units of the same digital asset held in the unhosted wallet were acquired by the taxpayer. Accordingly, TP must treat the 10 units sold as the 10 units with a purchase date of January 1, Year 1, and a basis of $2 per unit, transferred into the wallet.

    (iii) Example 3: Identification of digital assets held in the custody of a broker—(A) Facts. On August 1, Year 1, TP opens a custodial account at CRX, a broker within the meaning of § 1.6045-1(a)(1), and purchases through CRX 10 units of digital asset DE for $9 per unit. On January 1, Year 2, TP opens a custodial account at BEX, an unrelated broker, and purchases through BEX 20 units of digital asset DE for $5 per unit. On August 1, Year 3, TP transfers the digital assets TP holds with CRX into TP's custodial account with BEX. BEX has a policy that purchase or transfer date and time, if necessary, is a sufficiently specific identifier for customers to determine the units sold, disposed of, or transferred. On September 1, Year 3, TP directs BEX to sell 10 units of digital asset DE for $10 per unit and specifies that BEX sell the units that were purchased on January 1, Year 2. BEX effects the sale.

    (B) Analysis. No later than the date and time of the sale, TP specified to BEX the particular units of digital assets to be sold. Accordingly, under paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of this section, TP provided an adequate identification of the 10 units of digital asset DE sold. Accordingly, the 10 units of digital asset DE that TP sold are the 10 units that TP purchased on January 1, Year 2.

    (iv) Example 4: Identification of digital assets held in the custody of a broker—(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (j)(5)(iii)(A) of this section (the facts in Example 3) except that TP directs BEX to sell 10 units of digital asset DE but does not make any identification of which units to sell. Additionally, TP does not provide purchase date information to BEX with respect to the units transferred into TP's account with BEX.

    (B) Analysis. Because TP did not specify to BEX no later than the date and time of the sale the particular units of digital assets to be sold, TP did not make an adequate identification within the meaning of paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of this section. Thus, the ordering rule provided in paragraph (j)(3)(i) of this section applies to determine the units of digital asset DE sold. Pursuant to this rule, the units sold must be determined by treating the units held in the custody of the broker as disposed of in order of time from the earliest date on which units of the same digital asset held in the custody of a broker were acquired by the taxpayer. The 10 units of digital asset DE sold must be attributed to the 10 units of digital asset DE acquired on August 1, Year 1, which are the earliest units of digital asset DE acquired by TP that are held in TP's account with BEX. In addition, because TP did not provide to BEX customer-provided acquisition information as defined in § 1.6045-1(d)(2)(ii)(B)(4) with respect to the units transferred into TP's account with BEX (or adopt a standing order to follow the ordering rule applicable to BEX under § 1.6045-1(d)(2)(ii)(B)(2)), the units determined as sold by BEX under § 1.6045-1(d)(2)(ii)(B)(1) and that BEX will report as sold under § 1.6045-1 are not the same units that TP must treat as sold under this section. See § 1.6045-1(d)(2)(vii)(C) (Example 3).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1012-1(j)Sale, disposition, or transfer of digital assets. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Sale, disposition, or transfer of digital assets. Paragraphs (j)(1) and (2) of this section apply to digital assets not held in the custody of a broker, such as digital assets that are held in an unhosted wallet. Paragraph (j)(3) of this section applies to digital assets held in the custody of a broker. For the definitions of the terms wallet, hosted wallet, unhosted wallet, and held in a wallet or account, as used in this paragraph (j), see § 1.6045-1(a)(25)(i) through (iv). For the definition of the term broker, see § 1.6045-1(a)(1). For the definition of the term digital asset, see § 1.6045-1(a)(19); however, a digital asset not required to be reported as a digital asset pursuant to § 1.6045-1(c)(8)(ii), (iii), or (iv) is not subject to the rules of this section.

    (1) Digital assets not held in the custody of a broker. If a taxpayer sells, disposes of, or transfers less than all units of the same digital asset not held in the custody of the broker, such as in a single unhosted wallet or in a hosted wallet provided by a person other than a broker, the basis and holding period of the units sold, disposed of, or transferred are determined by making a specific identification of the units in the wallet that are sold, disposed of, or transferred, as provided in paragraph (j)(2) of this section. If a specific identification is not made, the basis and holding period of the units sold, disposed of, or transferred are determined by treating the units not held in the custody of a broker as sold, disposed of, or transferred in order of time from the earliest date on which units of the same digital asset not held in the custody of a broker were acquired by the taxpayer. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the date any units were transferred into the taxpayer's wallet is disregarded.

    (2) Specific identification of digital assets not held in the custody of a broker. A specific identification of the units of a digital asset sold, disposed of, or transferred is made if, no later than the date and time of the sale, disposition, or transfer, the taxpayer identifies on its books and records the particular units to be sold, disposed of, or transferred by reference to any identifier, such as purchase date and time or the purchase price for the unit, that is sufficient to identify the units sold, disposed of, or transferred. A specific identification can be made only if adequate records are maintained for the unit of a specific digital asset not held in the custody of a broker to establish that a unit sold, disposed of, or transferred is removed from the wallet.

    (3) Digital assets held in the custody of a broker. This paragraph (j)(3) applies to digital assets held in the custody of a broker.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1012-1(v)Example 5: Identification of the digital asset used to pay certain digital asset transaction costs—(A) Facts. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Example 5: Identification of the digital asset used to pay certain digital asset transaction costs—(A) Facts. On January 1, Year 1, TP purchases 10 units of digital asset AB and 30 units of digital asset CD in a custodial account with DRX, a broker within the meaning of § 1.6045-1(a)(1). DRX has a policy that purchase or transfer date and time, if necessary, is a sufficiently specific identifier by which its customers may identify the units sold, disposed of, or transferred. On June 30, Year 2, TP directs DRX to purchase 10 additional units of digital asset AB with 10 units of digital asset CD. DRX withholds one unit of the digital asset AB received for transaction fees. TP does not make any identification of the 1 unit of digital asset AB withheld by DRX. TP engages in no other transactions.

    (B) Analysis. DRX's withholding of 1 unit of digital asset AB from the 10 units acquired by TP is a disposition by TP of the 1 unit as of June 30, Year 2. See §§ 1.1001-7 and 1.1012-1(h) for determining the amount realized and basis of the disposed unit, respectively. Despite TP not making an adequate identification, within the meaning of paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of this section to DRX of the 1 unit withheld, under the special rule of paragraph (j)(3)(iii) of this section, the withheld unit of AB must be attributed to the units of AB acquired on June 30, Year 2 and held in TP's account with DRX.

    (vi) Example 6: Identification of the digital asset used to pay certain digital asset transaction costs—(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (j)(5)(v)(A) of this section (the facts in Example 5) except that TP has a standing order with BEX to treat the earliest unit purchased in TP's account as the unit sold, disposed of, or transferred.

    (B) Analysis. The transaction is an exchange of digital assets for different digital assets and for which the broker withholds units of the same digital asset received in order to pay digital asset transaction costs. Accordingly, although TP's standing order to treat the earliest unit purchased in TP's account (that is, the units purchased by TP on January 1, Year 1) as the units sold is an adequate identification under paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of this section, TP is deemed to have made an adequate identification for such withheld units pursuant to paragraph (j)(3)(iii) of this section regardless of TP's adequate identification designating other units as the units sold. Thus, the results are the same as provided in paragraph (j)(5)(v)(B) of this section (the analysis in Example 5).

    (6) Applicability date. This paragraph (j) is applicable to all acquisitions and dispositions of digital assets on or after January 1, 2025.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1012-2Transfers in part a sale and in part a gift Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    For rules relating to basis of property acquired in a transfer which is in part a gift and in part a sale, see §§ 1.170A-4(c), 1.1011-2(b), and § 1.105-4.

337 Citing Cases

Except as otherwise provided in subchapters C, K, and P, the adjusted basis of property is the property’s basis, determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

Regulation by State law; Federal law relating specifically to insurance; applicability of certain Federal laws after June 30, 1948 (a) State regulation— The business of insurance, and every person engaged therein, shall be subject to the laws of the several States which relate to the regulation or taxation of such business. (b) Federal regu

Howard would have received a cost basis in the receivables under section 1012, as opposed to the significantly larger basis claimed to be transferred from Santa Barbara through XBOXT and then to PIMLICO under section 721.

That is because section 1012 provides that the basis of property is equal to the cost of the property.

That section provides that “the direct costs of such property” and “such property’s proper share of those indirect costs .

§ 1012; Estate of Leavitt v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 206, 212 (1988), aff’d, 875 F.2d 420 (4th Cir. 1989). A taxpayer must increase his or her basis in S corporation stock by, among other things, the amount of his or her distributive share of corporate income. § 1367(a)(1). A taxpayer also increases basis by the excess of the deductions for depletion

Belcik v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2024-49 · 2024

Accordingly, we hold that Mr.

Adjusted basis is typically what a property owner paid for the property plus what he later spent to improve it, minus allowed or allowable depreciation. §§ 1011(a), 1012(a), 1016; see also Simonsen v. Commissioner, 150 T.C. 201, 213 (2018). Gain is the amount the seller receives reduced by the seller’s adjusted basis in the property. See §

Donald Furrer & Rita Furrer, Petitioners T.C. Memo. 2022-100 · 2022

erm capital gain is taxed as ordi- nary income. See §§ 1(a), (h)(1), 1222(1) (defining short-term capital gain). 11 [*11] corn and soybeans. First, they contend that they sold the crops to the CRATS, so that the CRATs acquired a “cost basis” under section 1012. This argument does not pass the straight-face test. As evidenced by the filing of gift tax returns, petitioners contributed the crops to the CRATs. There is no evidence that the CRATs, which had no assets be- fore the crops were transferr

The basis of property contributed to a partnership by a partner is the adjusted basis of the property to the contributing partner at the time of the contribution (adjusted for any gain recognized by the contributing partner). § 723. In the case of intangible assets, basis includes amounts that are required to be capitalized, such as amounts

§ 1367(a); see also Gleason v.

e signed and made payable to RLC for its stock. These notes are the only source of basis that Ryder has ever claimed. - 139 - [*139] The problem for Ryder is that paper promises not backed by cash don’t create basis. Basis is the cost of property, sec. 1012, and a shareholder gets basis in his shares in a corporation when he purchases those shares or contributes capital to that corporation, secs. 351(a), 358(a)(1); see also Maguire v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-160, 2012 WL 2036153, at *4. Fo

Rather, the rebate was a reduction in the purchase price, requiring a downward adjustment to the basis of the automobile pursuant to section 1012.

e signed and made payable to RLC for its stock. These notes are the only source of basis that Ryder has ever claimed. - 139 - [*139] The problem for Ryder is that paper promises not backed by cash don’t create basis. Basis is the cost of property, sec. 1012, and a shareholder gets basis in his shares in a corporation when he purchases those shares or contributes capital to that corporation, secs. 351(a), 358(a)(1); see also Maguire v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-160, 2012 WL 2036153, at *4. Fo

e signed and made payable to RLC for its stock. These notes are the only source of basis that Ryder has ever claimed. - 139 - [*139] The problem for Ryder is that paper promises not backed by cash don’t create basis. Basis is the cost of property, sec. 1012, and a shareholder gets basis in his shares in a corporation when he purchases those shares or contributes capital to that corporation, secs. 351(a), 358(a)(1); see also Maguire v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-160, 2012 WL 2036153, at *4. Fo

e signed and made payable to RLC for its stock. These notes are the only source of basis that Ryder has ever claimed. - 139 - [*139] The problem for Ryder is that paper promises not backed by cash don’t create basis. Basis is the cost of property, sec. 1012, and a shareholder gets basis in his shares in a corporation when he purchases those shares or contributes capital to that corporation, secs. 351(a), 358(a)(1); see also Maguire v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-160, 2012 WL 2036153, at *4. Fo

e signed and made payable to RLC for its stock. These notes are the only source of basis that Ryder has ever claimed. - 139 - [*139] The problem for Ryder is that paper promises not backed by cash don’t create basis. Basis is the cost of property, sec. 1012, and a shareholder gets basis in his shares in a corporation when he purchases those shares or contributes capital to that corporation, secs. 351(a), 358(a)(1); see also Maguire v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-160, 2012 WL 2036153, at *4. Fo

1012; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Commissioner, 104 T.C. 256, 308 (1995) ("Actual sales are generally the best evidence offair market value."). When a taxpayer claims a charitable contribution deduction for recently purchased property, a wide gap between cost basis and claimed value raises a red flag suggesting that the return merits examination

Amount ofDeduction Section 166(b) provides that the "amount ofthe deduction for any bad debt shall be the adjusted basis provided in section 1011 for determining the loss from the sale or other disposition ofproperty." Section 1011 cross-refers to section 1012, which provides that the basis ofproperty is generally its cost.

1012 (basis equals the cost to acquire property); see also Astone v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1983-747, 47 T.C.M. (CCH) 632, 656 n.24 (1983) ("Clearly, the giving ofa mortgage on a piece ofproperty during the period of ownership does not, in itself, increase the basis ofthe property"). The FCSA mortgage did not increase Andersen's basis in the

But petitioner simply refused to participate in the process and supplied no evidentiary material ofany sort. As the faculty director ofthe Harvard Trial Advocacy Workshop, petitionerpresumably appreciated that a failure to submit evidence may have adverse consequences. One ofthose consequences here is that he is foreclosed from disputing

92 - But the Code doesn't require a founding shareholder to take as his basis what he hopes the earnings on his investment will be--it requires him to take as his basis only the cost or amount ofwhatever he contributed. Secs. 351, 358(a); see also sec. 1012 (basis is cost). And the Code certainly doesn't treat his corporation as a sole proprietorship ifit turns out to be profitable. What the Mazzeis' Roth IRAs paid for the FSC stock is meaningless--which might be why the Commissioner didn't cha

1012; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Commissioner, 104 T.C. 256, 308 (1995) ("Actual sales are generally the best evidence offair market value[.]"). When a taxpayer claims a charitable con- tribution deduction for recently purchased property, a wide gap between cost basis and claimed value raises a red flag suggesting that the return merits examina

-17- [*17] purchases an interest in a partnership that holds appreciated property and takes that partnership interest with a cost basis under section 1012, the transferee partner's outside basis will exceed its share ofthe partnership's inside asset basis.

92 - But the Code doesn't require a founding shareholder to take as his basis what he hopes the earnings on his investment will be--it requires him to take as his basis only the cost or amount ofwhatever he contributed. Secs. 351, 358(a); see also sec. 1012 (basis is cost). And the Code certainly doesn't treat his corporation as a sole proprietorship ifit turns out to be profitable. What the Mazzeis' Roth IRAs paid for the FSC stock is meaningless--which might be why the Commissioner didn't cha

Under section 1012 basis is generally the property's cost. "Cost" is any "amount paid for such property in cash or other property." Sec. 1.1012-1(a), Income Tax Regs. Although cost basis generally equals the price paid for property, irrespective ofits actual value, this rule might not apply "where a transaction is based upon 'peculiar circumstances' whic

When taxpayers sell shares ofstock, they must compute their tax gain or loss by finding the difference between their cost basis and amount realized. Sec. 1001(a). As a general rule, when taxpayers hold multiple lots or shares ofidentical stock, they must compute their gains or losses against the basis ofthose shares actually sold, not th

Section 1001(b) provides that the amount realized from the sale ofproperty is the sum ofany money received plus the fair market value ofproperty other than money that is received.

uivalent exemptions to U.S. 4The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (1986 Act), Pub. L. No. 99-514, sec. 1212, 100 Stat. at 2536, as applicable here, was thereafter amended by Congress in the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-647, sec. 1012(e)(1), (2)(A), and (5), 102 Stat. at 3499-3500, and in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-239, sec. 7811(i)(8)(D), and (10), 103 Stat. at 2411. Those amendments do not affect our resolution ofthe issue ofthe vali

debtor's adjusted basis in the property. Sec. 1001(a). In the case ofrecourse debt, the amount realized is the fair market value ofthe property repossessed. Frazier v. Commissioner, 111 T.C. 243, 245 (1998). In general, the debtor's basis is cost.6 Sec. 1012. The debtor's basis must be reduced by the amount ofdepreciation that was allowed or allowable during 2010 and 2011. Sec. 1016(a)(2). 6Respondent argued that petitioners' basis in the assets should not include any amount paid for the assets

The adjusted AMT basis is the exercise price, increased by the amount ofincome included in AMTI by reason ofthe exercise ofthe ISOs. Sec. 56(b)(3); Merlo v. Commissioner, 126 T.C. 205, 209-210 (2006), afÕl, 492 F.3d 618 (5th Cir. 2007). Section 53 allows a taxpayerto claim a credit for AMT paid in prior years, adjusted for specific items

eration paid usually determines a taxpayer's basis in a capital asset such as the note. Section 1011 directs us that the basis to be used to determine gain or loss from a sale or other disposition of - 26 - [*26] property should be determined under section 1012. Section 1012 equates basis with the cost ofthe property. A liability that an asset's buyer assumes is included in the total cost ofacquiring property. Wash. Mut. Inc. v. United States, 636 F.3d 1207, 1217 (9th Cir. 2011).¹6 Putanec's ini

eration paid usually determines a taxpayer's basis in a capital asset such as the note. Section 1011 directs us that the basis to be used to determine gain or loss from a sale or other disposition of - 26 - [*26] property should be determined under section 1012. Section 1012 equates basis with the cost ofthe property. A liability that an asset's buyer assumes is included in the total cost ofacquiring property. Wash. Mut. Inc. v. United States, 636 F.3d 1207, 1217 (9th Cir. 2011).¹6 Putanec's ini

Generally, where a portion ofa larger property is sold, the cost ofthe entire property is "equitably apportioned among the several parts." W.C. & A.N. Miller Dev. Co. v. Commis- sioner, 81 T.C. 619, 632 (1983); sec. 1.61-6(a), Income Tax Regs. The parties agree that "equitable apportionment" should nót be applied here and that petitioner

tion ofproperty is computedwith reference to the amount realized from the disposition ofthe property and the property's adjusted basis. See sec. 1001(a). In general, adjusted basis is - 10 - determined with reference to the cost ofthe property, see sec. 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016. The transaction statements generated in connection with the stock petitioner acquired in the employee stock plan show the acquisition and the disposition of the stock that petitioner acquired as a parti

torial income tax returns and pay tax in the Virgin Islands were enacted as part ofthe Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA), Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1274(a), 100 Stat. 2596, and amended in the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-647, sec. 1012(w), 102 Stat. 3530. Virgin Islands residents generally were exempted from Federal income tax obligations ifthey met the requirements ofsection 932(c): SEC. 932. COORDINATION OF UNITED STATES AND VIRGIN ISLANDS INCOME TAXES. (c) Treatment ofVi

torial income tax returns and pay tax in the Virgin Islands were enacted as part ofthe Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA), Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1274(a), 100 Stat. 2596, and amended in the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-647, sec. 1012(w), 102 Stat. 3530. Virgin Islands residents generally were exempted from Federal income tax obligations ifthey met the requirements ofsection 932(c): SEC. 932. COORDINATION OF UNITED STATES AND VIRGIN ISLANDS INCOME TAXES. (c) Treatment ofVi

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

, aff'd, 180 F.2d 140 (8th Cir. 1950). Section 1011 provides that a taxpayer's adjusted basis for determiningthe gain or loss from the sale or other disposition ofproperty shall be its cost, adjusted to the extent provided in section 1016. See also sec. 1012. A property's cost is - 7 - [*7] "the amount paid for such property in cash or other property." Sec. 1.1012-1(a), Income Tax Regs. The term "cost" includes "any indebtedness to the seller for the purchase price ofthe property and any indebte

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

Capital Gain Section 1001(a) provides that "[t]he gain from the sale or other disposition ofproperty shall be the excess ofthe amount realized therefrom over the adjusted basis provided in section 1011 for determining gain".

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ders sell their stockto a third party, the C corporation continues to own its appreciated assets, and the corporate-level built-in gain is not triggered. Generally, buyers preferto purchase assets and receive a new basis equal to the purchase price, sec. 1012, whereas sellers disfavorthe sale ofassets because ofthe attendant corporate level tax. Because a stock sale merely defers the corporate level tax liability, however, a stock sale generally commands a lower sale price than an asset sale. -

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

ip under section 721; (3) whetherthe retailers' claimed contributions to and subsequentredemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale ofthe receivables, such thatthe receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryoverbasis under section 723; (4) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whetherthe 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutoryprerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) whethe

Kenna Trading, LLC v. Commissioner 143 T.C. 322 · 2014

under section 721; (3) whether the retailers’ claimed contributions to and subsequent redemptions from Sugarloaf should be collapsed into a single transaction and treated as a sale of the receivables, such that the receivables had a cost basis under section 1012 rather than a carryover basis under section 723; (4) whether the 2004 partnership transactions had economic substance; (5) whether the 2004 partnership transactions satisfied the statutory prerequisites for a section 166 deduction; (6) w

Lori M. & John M. Mingo, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2013-149 · 2013

Section 1012 provides that, generally, the basis ofproperty shall be the cost ofsuch property.

n."). In addition to the general rules for determi ing basis (i.e., those found in section 1011), there are spec al iules that require arinual Ädjüstments to thè 3(...continued) °A corporat d bt obligatión should be property" for the purposes ofIRC § 1012. James S. Eustice & Joel D. I untz, Federal Income Taxation ofS Corporations, par. 9 02 & n.20, 9.02[1] b] 1.30 (4th ed. 2001). - 15 - [*15] shareholéler's adjusted basis ofstock ofan S corporation and to the shareholder's adjusted basis ofdebt

Reynoso v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2013-25 · 2013

the amount he realized from its sale. Section 1011 provides that a taxpayer's adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition ofproperty shall be its cost, adjusted to the extent provided in section 1016. See also sec. 1012. A property's cost is "the amount paid for such property in cash or other property." Sec. 1.1012-1(a), Income Tax Regs. The term "cost" includes "any indebtedness to the seller for the purchase price ofthe property and any indebtedness to a

t petitioner does not meet the requirements ofsection 932(c)(4)(B) (that he did not "The residual U.S. tax liability was emphasized by the 1988 amendment to the TRA in the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988 (TAMRA), Pub. L. No. 100-647, sec. 1012(w)(3), 102 Stat. at 3530. Sec. 932(c)(2) originally provided that an individual affected by subsection (c) "shall file his income tax return for the taxable year with the Virgin Islands." This was changed in 1988 to "shall file an income ta

Adjusted basis is generally basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as determined under section 1016.

After the $2,965,000 capital contribution to the management òompany, petitioners' tax bases in their management company stock were approximately equal to the $2,969,000 claimed loss deduction that arose from the management company's payment ofthe deferred compensation. On audit, respondent relied alternatively on sec. 482 to reallocate t

Gaggero v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2012-331 · 2012

1.1012- 1(a), Income Tax Regs. The parties don't dispute that Gaggero's basis in the property before entering into the agreement with BCC was $689,000. But a taxpayer increases his adjusted basis by the cost ofimprovements that he made. - 35 - [*35] Sec. 1016(a)(1); sec. 1.1016-2(a), Income Tax Regs. The parties stipulated that by

John & Janet Aldeborgh, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-8 · 2012

1012. Under section 1016(a) (1), the basis of property must be adjusted for expenditures, receipts, losses, or other items properly chargeable to capital account. A taxpayer has the burden of proving the basis of property for purposes of determining the amount of gain the taxpayer must recognize. O'Neill v. Commissioner, 271 F.2d 44, 50 (9th Cir..1959), affg. T.C. Memo. 1957-193. "The special adjusted basis computation rule that applies to bargain sales to charitable organizations is inapplicabl

The trusts' bases in the currency and the shares purchased by Tigers Eye for them are, pursuant to section 1012, the costs ofthat property, and those costs, in this case, are entity items.

Bradley T. & Terri Jensen, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-166 · 2012

After the $2,965,000 capital contribution to the management òompany, petitioners' tax bases in their management company stock were approximately equal to the $2,969,000 claimed loss deduction that arose from the management company's payment ofthe deferred compensation. On audit, respondent relied alternatively on sec. 482 to reallocate t

Subchapter K creates a detailed and complex system of rules for characterizing transactions between the partnership and the partners, computing and/or characterizing partnership income, assets, and liabilities, allocating those items among the partners, and determining and making adjustments to a partner’s basis (cost for tax purposes under section 1012 except as otherwise provided in subchapter K) in the partnership for his share of those items.

Oglesby v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2011-93 · 2011

1011 (giving general rule that the adjusted basis is basis under section 1012 as adjusted by section 1016); sec.

Benedict's cost basis in the property was $320,000. Transfers of property -between an individual and a spouse, however, are treated as gifts, and the basis of the - 6 - transferee in the "gifted" property is the same as the adjusted basis of the transferor. Sec. 1041(a) and (b) . There is no evidence in:the record to show that the adjus

1012; see also sec. 1.707-3(a) (2), Income Tax Regs. To be sure, Mr. Valdez structured the transactions using entities he controlled, aiming to manipulate the rules applicable to partnership taxation so that he could sell to his U.S. "investors" foreign built-in losses that they could personally -34- apply as ordinary losses. He provided the

Accordingly, we hold the State tax credits petitioners sold are capital assets.

The amount realized on the sale or disposition is the amount of money received plus the fair.market value of any property received. Sec. 1001(b). Petitioner's adjusted basis in Walker Street was $43,000 reduced by the amount of depreciation allowed or allowable under subtitle A.4 .Sec. 1016(a) (2).s The amount 4Petitioner deducted $992 o

Tempel v. Commissioner 136 T.C. 341 · 2011

Basis Section 1012 sets forth the foundational principle that the basis of property for tax purposes shall be the cost of the property. Cost, in turn, is defined by regulation as the amount paid for the property in cash or other property. Sec. 1.1012-l(a), Income Tax Regs. Petitioners argue that they have a cost basis in their State tax credits. On their

ls file income tax returns and pay tax in the Virgin Islands, were enacted as part of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1274(a), 100 Stat. 2596, and amended in the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-647, sec 1012(w), 102 Stat. 3530. Virgin Islands residents were generally exempted from Federal income tax obligations if they met the requirements of section 932 (c) (4): (4) Residents of the Virgin Islands.--In the case of an individual-- (A) who is a bona f

Stewart v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2010-184 · 2010

2008-46 (the basis of property, under section 1012, is generally defined as,cost and that cost is adjusted pursuant to section 1016) ; see also Kikalos v .

Needham & Angela Jarman, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2010-285 · 2010

If property is acquired from a decedent, however, the basis is the property's fair market value at the date of the decedent's death, unless the alternate valuation date is elected. Sec. 1014(a). Where property is acquired by gift, the basis is the same in the hands of the donee as it was in the hands of the donor, except that, if the bas

West Covina Motors, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2009-291 · 2009

1012-1(a), Income Tax Regs . Legal fees incurred in the acquisition or disposition of a capital asset are to be treated as capital expenditures and are to be "added to the basis-of the capital asset with respect to which they are incurred." Woodward v. Commissioner., 397 U .S . 572, 574-575 (1970) ; Berry Petroleum Co .-& Subs . v . Commission

Park Amusement Co. v. United States, 130 Ct. Cl. 166, 126 F. Supp. 184, 189 (1964). Including as tit. XI of the report, from the Committee on Ways and Means, an explanation of the revenue provisions of the accompanying bill, which, among other things, added sec. 1031(0. In Teruya Bros., Ltd. & Subs. v. Commissioner, 124 T.C. 45, 5

William D. & Judith A. Jamieson, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2008-118 · 2008

Applying the last-in-time rule, we hold that section 59(a)(2) is - 17 - the last expression of the sovereign will and that it takes precedence over the U .S .-Canada Convention to the extent there is a conflict between them.

Perano v. Commissioner 130 T.C. 93 · 2008

capital expenditures, which are not deductible, sec. 263(a)(1), regardless of the number of payments made or the total amount to be paid, Perkins v. United States, supra at 775. The payments give the taxpayer a cost basis in the acquired property, sec. 1012, and the taxpayer recovers his investment in the property by way of deductions for depreciation, sec. 167(a), or by way of an offset of any unrecovered basis against the amount realized on a sale or disposition of the property, sec. 1001(a).

Nussdorf v. Commissioner 129 T.C. No. 5 · 2007

§ 1012 and the authorities thereunder * * 12. An issue concerning the cost basis of prop- erty in the hands of the taxpayer, pre-contribution, inevitably turns on law and facts unique to the tax- payer and the particular property in question, which are the hallmark of "nonpartnership items ." * * * To consider issues "peculiar to a single partner"

Mark N. & Erica Y. Wright, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2007-50 · 2007

As regards basis, section 1012 sets forth the foundational principle that the basis of property for tax purposes shall be the cost of the property.

Marcus v. Commissioner 129 T.C. 24 · 2007

The adjusted AMT basis is the exercise price increased by the amount of income included in AMTI by reason of the exercise of ISOs. Sec. 56(b)(3); Merlo v. Commissioner, supra at 209-210. With respect to the 30,297 Veritas shares sold in 2001, petitioners had a regular tax basis of $127,920, the exercise price. Petitioners had an adjusted

Nussdorf v. Commissioner 129 T.C. 30 · 2007

§ 1012 and the authorities thereunder * * *. 12. An issue concerning the cost basis of property in the hands of the taxpayer, pre-contribution, inevitably turns on law and facts unique to the taxpayer and the particular property in question, which are the hallmark of “nonpartnership items.” * * * To consider issues “peculiar to a single partner” as

Merlo v. Commissioner 126 T.C. No. 10 · 2006

However, for AMT purposes, section 56(b)(3) provides that the adjusted basis of any stock acquired by the exercise of an ISO “shall be determined on the basis of the treatment prescribed by this paragraph.” Thus, the taxpayer will increase his adjusted AMT basis by the amount of income included in his AMTI. See secs. 55(b)(2), 56(b)(3),

The basis of property acquired by gift is the same as it would be in the hands of the donor or the last preceding owner by whom it was not acquired by gift. If such basis is greater than the fair market value of the property at the time of the gift, however, the basis for determining loss is the fair market value of the property. Sec. 10

Thomas & Janice Gleason, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2006-191 · 2006

As regards basis, section 1012 sets forth the foundational principle that the basis of property for tax purposes shall be the cost of the property.

Merlo v. Commissioner 126 T.C. 205 · 2006

However, for AMT purposes, section 56(b)(3) provides that the adjusted basis of any stock acquired by the exercise of an iso “shall be determined on the basis of the treatment prescribed by this paragraph.” Thus, the taxpayer will increase his adjusted AMT basis by the amount of income included in his AMTI. See secs. 55(b)(2), 56(b)(3),

Montgomery v. Commissioner 127 T.C. 43 · 2006

However, for amt purposes, section 56(b)(3) provides that the adjusted basis of any stock acquired by the exercise of an ISO “shall be determined on the basis of the treatment prescribed by this paragraph.” In other words, a taxpayer’s adjusted AMT basis equals the exercise or cost basis in the shares increased by the amount of income in

The buyer would only have taxable gain on the disposition of the marketable securities to the extent they appreciated in value subsequent to the time of acquisition. There'fore, the buyer would be willing to pay the - 30 - full fair market value for the securities without any discount. We agree with the Fifth Circuit that "correctly app

Riley & Joyce Pendergraft, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2005-236 · 2005

Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-532, affd. 199 F.3d 440 (5th Cir. 1999). Respondent contends that petitioners have failed to substantiate a cost basis in their residence above the $163,148 determined by respondent at trial and that petitioners therefore in 2000 realized $126,852 in capital gain on the sale.6 With one exception not

Hodges v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2005-168 · 2005

For the reasons that follow, we do not find petitioner’s wife’s testimony as to the origin of the securities in petitioner’s hands to be credible, and we give it no weight. First, her testimony was self-serving (in that we assume, as petitioner’s wife, she has an economic stake in the outcome of this case). We need not accept self-servin

Maloof v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2005-75 · 2005

"Cost" is defined as the "amount paid" for property "in cash or other property." Sec. 1.1012-1(a), Income Tax Regs. - 8 - 1324 (llth Cir. 1999); Underwood v. Commissioner, 63 T.C. 468, 477 (1975),. affd. 535 F.2d 309 (5th Cir. 1976); Prashker v. Commissioner, 59 T.C. 172 (1972); Perry v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 1293, 1296 (1970), affd. 39

Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-532, affd. 199 F.3d 440 (5th Cir. 1999). Respondent contends that petitioners have failed to substantiate a cost basis in their residence above the $163,148 determined by respondent at trial and that petitioners therefore in 2000 realized $126,852 in capital gain on the sale.6 With one exception not

NHUSS Trust, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2005-236 · 2005

Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-532, affd. 199 F.3d 440 (5th Cir. 1999). Respondent contends that petitioners have failed to substantiate a cost basis in their residence above the $163,148 determined by respondent at trial and that petitioners therefore in 2000 realized $126,852 in capital gain on the sale.6 With one exception not

Storaasli v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2005-59 · 2005

affd. 180 F.2d 140 (8th Cir. 1950). Section 1011 provides that a taxpayer’s adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property shall be its cost, adjusted to the extent provided by section 1016. See also sec. 1012. Under section 1016(a)(1), the basis of property must be adjusted for expenditures, receipts, losses, or other items, properly chargeable to capital account. The cost of improvements and betterments made to a taxpayer’s property are among th

Estate of Kahn v. Commissioner 125 T.C. 227 · 2005

The buyer would only have taxable gain on the disposition of the marketable securities to the extent they appreciated in value subsequent to the time of acquisition. Therefore, the buyer would be willing to pay the full fair market value for the securities without any discount. We agree with the Fifth Circuit that “correctly applying the

The basis of inherited property ordinarily is the fair market value of the property at the date of the decedent's death. Sec. 1014. The basis of property acquired by gift is the same as it would be in the hands of the donor or the last preceding owner by whom it was not acquired by gift, except that if such basis is greater than the fair

Tibor Guenther & Christel Horwath, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2004-213 · 2004

As pertinent here, section 1011(a) defines the term "adjusted basis" as the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided under section 1016, and section 1012 pro- vides that the basis of property is its cost.

Respondent contends that “It is apparent” from the text of section 1011 “that alternatives to the cost basis of § 1012 are confined to ‘this subchapter’ (subchapter O) or elsewhere in the Code, namely, subchapters C, K - 14 - and P.” He argues that section 1011 does not refer to an adjusted basis specified in other “internal revenue laws”, and the language in section 1.1011-1, Income Tax Regs., “does not provide for alternatives

Medlin v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2003-224 · 2003

The adjusted basis for determining gain from the sale of property, whenever acquired, shall be the basis determined under section 1012 and adjusted as provided in section 1016.

— The adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property, whenever acquired, shall be the basis (determined under section 1012 or other applicable sections of this subchapter and subchapters C (relating to corporate distributions and adjustments), K (relating to partners and partnerships), and P (relating to capital gains and losses)), adjusted as provided in section 1016.

In two written stipulations, all of the issues have been settled except the following: (1) The amount of petitioner's basis, under section 1012, in stock of General Electric Co.

Under section 1.1011-1, Income Tax Regs., adjusted basis is the cost or other basis of property under section 1012, adjusted to reflect allowable deductions for depreciation under section 1016.

Section 1011(a) provides that the adjusted basis for determining gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

Steven K. & Ellen M. Stoddard, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-31 · 2002

We agree with respondent that section 1016(a)(2) requires a decrease in petitioners’ basis in the condo, determined under section 1012 (i.e., the cost), for depreciation allowed or allowable, whichever is greater, under section 167(a).

McFadden v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2002-166 · 2002

Section 1012 sets forth the fundamental proposition that “the basis of property shall be the cost of such property”. It is well settled that the cost of property to a mortgagee who receives a voluntary conveyance on account of a debt is the property’s fair market value. See Commissioner v. Spreckels, 120 F.2d 517, 520 (9th Cir. 1941); Kohn v. Commi

Orin F. & Mary L. Farnsworth, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-29 · 2002

1012 (basis of property is cost); Gertz v. Commissioner, 64 T.C. 598 (1975) (disallowing bad debt deduction for unpaid wages that were never included in income). Petitioners offered no evidence, other than Mr. Farnsworth’s self-serving testimony, to show that Mr. Farnsworth previously included the retention amounts in income. - 15 - Responden

Robert M. & Pamela Price, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-215 · 2002

1012 (aa)(4), 102 Stat. 3532. Thus, the Third Protocol specifically takes into account, as the taxes to which the convention shall apply, the alternative minimum tax as amended by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, including the limitation on the alternative minimum tax foreign tax credit imposed by section 59(a)(2). Accordingly, we find that there i

The adjusted cost basis under section 1011 for determining gain or loss from the sale of property is the cost basis or other basis determined under section 1012 adjusted as provided by section 1016.

With exceptions not here relevant, section 1012 provides the following rule: “The basis of property shall be the cost of such - 53 - property”.

Under section 1.1011-1, Income Tax Regs., adjusted basis is the cost or other basis of property under section 1012, adjusted to reflect allowable deductions for depreciation under section 1016.

the record indicates petitioner and Mr. Anthony elected to have sec. 1041 apply to the post-1983 transfer. See Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98-369, sec. 421, 98 Stat. 793. - 7 - interest which is deemed to have been sold to her. See id.; sec. 1012. Respondent, assuming the division of property upon divorce was an equal but taxable division, made the following determination of the amount of gain on the sale of the Compton residence: Selling price $119,000 Selling expenses (16,852) Adju

Furthermore, the tax returns filed on behalf of each partnership compute the partnership's cost basis for each property under section 1012 as the contract price of the property less the rental deficit contribution for that property and claim depreciation on the portion of the cost that was allocated to the improvements.

Brodsky v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2001-240 · 2001

As pertinent here, (1) petitioner’s adjusted basis in determining the gain or the loss from the sale of the Church Street property is his basis in that property determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016,88 see sec.

* *, and (B) the shareholder’s adjusted basis of any indebtedness of the S corporation to the shareholder * * * - 10 - In pertinent part, section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis of property shall be the basis of such property determined under section 1012. In pertinent part, section 1012 provides that the basis of property shall be the cost of such property. III. Arguments of the Parties Petitioners argue: “The application of traditional debt- equity principles results in the characterizat

Furthermore, the tax returns filed on behalf of each partnership compute the partnership's cost basis for each property under section 1012 as the contract price of the property less the rental deficit contribution for that property and claim depreciation on the portion of the cost that was allocated to the improvements.

Metrocorp, Inc. v. Commissioner 116 T.C. 211 · 2001

With exceptions not here relevant, section 1012 provides the following rule: “The basis of property shall be the cost of such property”.

DeJoy v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2000-162 · 2000

Distributions by S corporations without accumulated earnings and profits, on the other hand, decrease the shareholders’ bases in their stock in the corporations. See sec. 1367(a)(2)(A). Under section 165, taxpayers may take deductions for losses sustained in sales or exchanges of capital assets and for worthless securities. See sec. 165(

General Dynamics Corp., supra at 243.] The all-events test also applies under section 1012 to the accrual into the tax bases of capital assets of estimated future capital costs.

1012; Better Beverages, Inc. v. United States, 619 F.2d 424, 428 (5th Cir. 1980); Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. v. United States, 444 F.2d 677, 683-684 (5th Cir. 1971). Future contract value is not the cost of the two outdoor signs.4 There is no evidence of the 4 Future contract value is not a proper grounds for computing gain. See sec. 1012; Be

Miller v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2000-240 · 2000

As pertinent here, section 1011(a) provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016, and section 1012 provides that the basis of property is its cost.

Culnen v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2000-139 · 2000

Adjusted basis is determined by making certain adjustments to cost basis. See sec. 1016. Section 1367 provides additional, special rules with respect to adjusting basis in an S corporation investment. The disagreement between the parties concerns only petitioner's cost basis in his Wedgewood investment. The parties disagree as to whether

Cascade Designs, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2000-58 · 2000

ich was designated sec. 167(g) in 1979 and 1982), specifies the basis for depreciation of any property "shall be the adjusted basis provided in section 1011, for the purpose of determining the gain on the sale or other disposition of such property." Sec. 1012, when read with sec. 1011, provides that the adjusted basis of the property is its "cost". If the purchase price of a patent is expressed by formula by which a fixed dollar amount cannot be ascertained until future years, such as a purchase

Brannon v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2000-76 · 2000

not engaged in for profit under section 183(a); (2) alternatively, whether, under section 162(a), some of the expenses in connection with the activity were substantiated; (3) whether petitioner, in an unrelated business activity, established, under section 1012, a basis for an asset used in that activity upon which depreciation would be allowable under section 167(a); and (4) whether petitioner is liable for the penalties under section 6662(a).

Otis W. & Alma F. Jordan, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2000-206 · 2000

1.162- 12(a), Income Tax Regs. Cost incurred to raise livestock may be deducted or capitalized at the option of the taxpayer. See sec. 1.162-12(a), Income Tax Regs. In contrast, under the applicable version of the controlling regulation, the cost of acquiring, as opposed to raising, a sporting animal, such as a race horse, is consid

James M. & Jane I. Lea, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2000-58 · 2000

ich was designated sec. 167(g) in 1979 and 1982), specifies the basis for depreciation of any property "shall be the adjusted basis provided in section 1011, for the purpose of determining the gain on the sale or other disposition of such property." Sec. 1012, when read with sec. 1011, provides that the adjusted basis of the property is its "cost". If the purchase price of a patent is expressed by formula by which a fixed dollar amount cannot be ascertained until future years, such as a purchase

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Commissioner 114 T.C. 293 · 2000

General Dynamics Corp., supra at 243.] The all-events test also applies under section 1012 to the accrual into the tax bases of capital assets of estimated future capital costs.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

Johnson v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1999-312 · 1999

Petitioner bears the burden of proving that respondent's deficiency determination is in error. See Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). B. Dividend Income Gross income includes dividends. See sec. 61(a)(7). Petitioner offered no evidence to dispute respondent's determination that he received, but did not report, div

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

Section 1012 provi es that the basis of property is the cost of the property an under section 362(a) such basis in a transferor carries over tó a corporation where such property is contributed tö the corporation for stock under section 351. The transaction involved here is a classic .xample of loss- buyirig. It was a premeditated and abusive tax s

nded a total of $40,359 during 1985 and 1986 to acquire and convert the bus into a motor home; however, they claimed only $18,517 in total depreciation from 1985 through 1989.5 Pursuant to section 1011(a), the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the cost of the property determined under section 1012 adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

Karara v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1999-253 · 1999

Generally, under section 1012, the basis of property is its cost.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

Golub v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1999-288 · 1999

Commissioner, 92 T.C. 1027, 1038 (1989); sec. 1.1012-1(c), Income Tax Regs. Petitioner is a certified public accountant, and the record shows that he is aware that gain on the sale of stock represents the amount received over the basis.7 See sec. 1001(a). Despite repeated invitations by respondent and by the Court to prove his ba

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

- 542 - Section 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016.

Stilz v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1999-245 · 1999

1012.2 Second, when she acquired her husband's interest in the house incident to the divorce, she took his adjusted basis in the property pursuant to section 1041(b)(2).3 The total purchase price paid by petitioner and her 2SEC. 1012. BASIS OF PROPERTY--COST. The basis of property shall be the cost of such property, except as otherwise provide

Ron L. & Gayle R. Stevenson, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-280 · 1999

ed from dealings in property. See sec. 61(a)(3). The gain from the sale of property is the excess of the amount realized over the taxpayer's adjusted basis in the property. See sec. 1001(a). Generally, the adjusted basis in property is its cost, see sec. 1012, and the expenses of the sale reduce its sale price, see, e.g., Southern Pac. Transp. Co. v. Commissioner, 75 T.C. 497, 586 n.86 (1980) (and the cases cited therein); see also Lanrao, Inc. v. United States, 422 F.2d 481 (6th Cir. 1970). Pet

167(g).32 Pursuant to section 1011(a), the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the cost of the property determined under section 1012 (with certain exceptions not material here) adjusted as provided in section 1016.

167(g).32 Pursuant to section 1011(a), the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the cost of the property determined under section 1012 (with certain exceptions not material here) adjusted as provided in section 1016.

Respondent claims that the present case is factually distinguishable from the developer line of cases and .that the principles of those cases "have never been applied outside the narrow factual context in which those cases arose." In the alternative, respondent argues that, if the developer line of cases "have relevance beyond their unique facts", the present case fails

We disagree with petitioner's position that section 1012 and the regulations thereunder are determinative of the cost of Consolidated's customer cores for purposes of section 471.

Martin Ice Cream Company, Petitioner 110 T.C. No. 18 · 1998

n 6661(a) provides for an addition to tax of “25 percent of the amount of any underpayment attributable” to “a substantial understatement of income tax for any taxable year”, for 34 We note the recent debate over the amendment to sec. 355 enacted in sec. 1012, Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Pub. L. 105- 34, 111 Stat. 788, 914. - 68 - penalties assessed after October 21, 1986. Section 6661(b)(1) defines a substantial understatement as any understatement that exceeds the greater of $10,000 in the ca

r section 1016(a)(1). Petitioner proposes the following allocation: 2 As pertinent to this case, sec. 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the cost of such property, see sec. 1012, adjusted as provided in sec. 1016. Sec. 1016(a)(1), in part, provides that proper adjustment is to be made for expenditures, receipts, losses, or other items, properly chargeable to capital account. Sec. 1.1016-2(a), Income Tax Regs., in p

r section 1016(a)(1). Petitioner proposes the following allocation: 2 As pertinent to this case, sec. 1011 provides that the adjusted basis for determining gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the cost of such property, see sec. 1012, adjusted as provided in sec. 1016. Sec. 1016(a)(1), in part, provides that proper adjustment is to be made for expenditures, receipts, losses, or other items, properly chargeable to capital account. Sec. 1.1016-2(a), Income Tax Regs., in p

Petitioner further contends that section 1012 and the regulations thereunder relating to the cost basis of property require Consolidated to ascertain the respective fair market values of the customer cores that it acquired in determining the cost of those cores for purposes of section 471.

Spencer v. Commissioner 110 T.C. 62 · 1998

Pursuant to section 1011(a), the adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property is the cost of the property determined under section 1012 (with certain exceptions not material here) adjusted as provided in section 1016.

George A. & MarySue Coward, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-198 · 1997

Respondent next argues that petitioners have failed to establish when the cattle were placed in service. Petitioners argue that it is not significant when the cattle were placed in service if it occurred within the taxable year 1978. Upon consideration, we are not persuaded by either argument in its entirety. The majority of the cattle w

Section 1012 provides that a taxpayer generally has a basis in property equal to its cost. Cost is defined as "the amount paid for such property in cash or other property." Sec. 1.1012-1(a), Income Tax Regs. Under the circumstances present here, cost means the amount paid by petitioners. Detroit Edison Co. v. Commissioner, 319 U.S. 98, 102 (1943);

Section 1012 sets forth the general rule that the basis of property shall be the cost of such property. Additionally, section 1060 sets forth special allocation rules for determining a transferee's basis in certain asset acquisitions. Section 1060 was added to the Internal Revenue Code in 1986, Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 641(a), 1

Section 1012 provides that the basis of property is the cost of the property. A shareholder's basis in his shares of - 12 - corporate stock is equal to the amount paid for the stock. Estate of Leavitt v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 206, 212 (1988), affd. 875 F.2d 420 (4th Cir. 1989); Uri v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-58, affd. 949 F.2d 371 (10th Cir.

The Supreme Court in Crane v. Commissioner, 331 U.S. 1 (1947), established that the cost basis of an asset includes nonrecourse indebtedness borrowed to purchase the asset. See Mayerson v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 340, 351-352 (1966). The Internal Revenue Code provides that the basis is to be adjusted to take into account certain factors, s

Fisher v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1997-450 · 1997

Section 1012 provides that the basis of property shall be the cost of such property. Under the circumstances present here, "cost", for purposes of the Code, means the amount paid by petitioner. Detroit Edison Co. v. Commissioner, 319 U.S. 98, 102 (1943); Borg v. Commissioner, 50 T.C. 257, 263 (1968). Petitioner did not provide respondent with any e

Santar S. & Grace H. Yei, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-57 · 1997

1.1012-1(a), Income Tax Regs. There is nothing about the $19,000 in payments to family members to suggest that such payments be allocated to the cost basis of the stock. The $19,000 was paid to family members who had no ownership interests in the Solectron stock. Accordingly, we hold that the Solectron stock basis is $10,000, as rep

1.1012-1(a), Income Tax Regs. In this instance, petitioners bear the burden of proving petitioner's basis in the demand note. Rule 142(a). Petitioners indicated a cost basis in the demand note in the amount of $11,400. At trial, petitioner explained that he was entitled to increase his basis in the demand note for - 10 - "opportuni

David & Naomi Dobrich, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-477 · 1997

The basis is adjusted for the costs of improvements and betterments made to the property. Sec. 1016(a)(1); sec. 1.1016-2(a), Income Tax Regs. Petitioners paid $300,000 for 137 acres of the Antioch property and sold 117 acres of the property in the transaction at issue in this case. Petitioners' original basis in the 117 acres, based on t

Bennett v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1997-145 · 1997

Section 1012 provides that a taxpayer generally has a basis in property equal to its cost. Petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that he is entitled to a basis in the automobiles - 24 - in excess of that determined by respondent. Rule 142(a); Burnet v. Houston, 283 U.S. 223, 227-228 (1931). Petitioner has not presented any documentation to

Roman v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1997-143 · 1997

As pertinent here, section 1011(a) defines the term "adjusted basis" as the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided under section 1016, and section 1012 provides that the basis of property is its cost.

David & Naomi Dobrich, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-477 · 1997

The basis is adjusted for the costs of improvements and betterments made to the property. Sec. 1016(a)(1); sec. 1.1016-2(a), Income Tax Regs. Petitioners paid $300,000 for 137 acres of the Antioch property and sold 117 acres of the property in the transaction at issue in this case. Petitioners' original basis in the 117 acres, based on t

Peter D. & Carolina T. Sleiman, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-530 · 1997

Section 1012 provides that the basis of property is the cost of the property. A shareholder's basis in his shares of - 12 - corporate stock is equal to the amount paid for the stock. Estate of Leavitt v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 206, 212 (1988), affd. 875 F.2d 420 (4th Cir. 1989); Uri v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-58, affd. 949 F.2d 371 (10th Cir.

.8] We conclude that section 1.936-6(b)(1) Q&A-12, Income Tax Regs., establishes a permissible method for computing CTI where 8Sec. 936(h)(7) was redesignated as sec. 936(h)(8) by the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-647, sec. 1012(h)(2)(B), 102 Stat. 3502. - 38 - the possession product is a component product. In evaluating the regulations under section 936, we are mindful of the Supreme Court's admonition: "The choice among reasonable interpretations is for the Commi

Sections 274(g) and 512(g) were incorporated into the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 by section 272(g) (relating to the income tax) and section 1012(g) (relating to the gift tax); again no comparable section was included in the estate tax provisions of the 1939 Code.

Reis v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1996-469 · 1996

As pertinent here, section 1011(a) defines the term "adjusted basis" as the basis determined under section 1012, adjusted as provided in section 1016, and section 1012 provides that the basis of property is its cost.

Donald J. & Judith E. Peracchi, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-191 · 1996

Under section 1012 of the Code, petitioners' basis in the Capital Note was $1,060,000, its face amount. 4. Alternatively, under section 1012 of the Internal Revenue Code, NAC Corporation's basis in the Capital Note was $1,060,000, its face amount. All of petitioners' arguments presuppose that the Capital Note represents genuine indebtedness. Since we do

Inverworld, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-301 · 1996

Act), Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1214 (c)(5) and (d)(1), 100 Stat. 2543.23 In the instant case, the interest from U.S. and foreign banks was paid by LTD to its clients during the calendar years 1984 through 1989. Source rules for interest are generally 23 Sec. 1012(g)(1) of the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-647, 102 Stat. 3500, retroactively provided the effective date of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (1986 Act), Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1214(c)(5), 100 Stat. 2543, as if includ

Inverworld Ltd., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-301 · 1996

Act), Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1214 (c)(5) and (d)(1), 100 Stat. 2543.23 In the instant case, the interest from U.S. and foreign banks was paid by LTD to its clients during the calendar years 1984 through 1989. Source rules for interest are generally 23 Sec. 1012(g)(1) of the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-647, 102 Stat. 3500, retroactively provided the effective date of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (1986 Act), Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1214(c)(5), 100 Stat. 2543, as if includ

Richard A. & Carol B. Little, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-270 · 1996

The amount he paid includes cash and other property given in exchange for the property and any liabilities petitioner assumed or to which the property is subject. Commissioner v. Tufts, 461 U.S. 300, 307 (1983); Crane v. Commissioner, 331 U.S. 1, 11 (1947). Petitioner bought 34,900 shares of Texana Capital stock for $199,600 on December

Robert J. & Anne L. Wilson, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-418 · 1996

The "adjusted basis" of property exchanged is the property's unadjusted basis (e.g., section 1012 cost basis) adjusted as provided in section 1016 (e.g., reduced for depreciation allowable).

Estate of Bartels v. Commissioner 106 T.C. 430 · 1996

Sections 274(g) and 512(g) were incorporated into the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 by section 272(g) (relating to the income tax) and section 1012(g) (relating to the gift tax); again no comparable section was included in the estate tax provisions of the 1939 Code.

1012; Simmonds Precision Prods. v. Commissioner, 75 T.C. 103, 115 (1980). Expenses incurred in the transaction are also properly included in basis. Sec. 1016(a).5 We applied this general rule in the similar situation presented in International Telephone & Telegraph v. Commissioner, supra, wherein we held the debentures had a basis to ITT equal

Leonard L. & Joyce S. Leighton, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1995-515 · 1995

In fact, to the extent that any of the testimony at trial herein or any of the exhibits admitted into evidence touched upon it at all, it was strongly suggested that petitioner had no cost basis in the various ventures in any amount. (3) As to the additional capital losses claimed by petitioners as an offset, and more, to the capital gai

titioner bears the burden of proving that it is entitled to the additional - 8 - $3,081,584 in basis. Rule 142(a);5 Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). The basis upon which depreciation deductions are allowed is the basis determined under section 1012. Secs. 167(g), 1011(a). Section 1012 provides in pertinent part: "The basis of property shall be the cost of such property". Generally, the cost basis of property purchased with other property is the fair market value of the property rece

Oliver Q. & Talietha Foust, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1995-481 · 1995

This Court has looked to section 1012 when defining "basis" for purposes of a shareholder's stock in an S corporation.

Baker v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1995-495 · 1995

Thus, the amended petition alleges in part as follows: During the years of 1990, 1991, and 1992 the Petitioner did in fact receive payment for services actually rendered in a fair market value exchange under 26 USC §83, §1001, §1011 and §1012 not comprising taxable income, said acts performed as Unalienable rights to life, liberty, pursue happiness and acquire property, with labor being property.

Baker v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1995-495 · 1995

Thus, the amended petition alleges in part as follows: During the years of 1990, 1991, and 1992 the Petitioner did in fact receive payment for services actually rendered in a fair market value exchange under 26 USC §83, §1001, §1011 and §1012 not comprising taxable income, said acts performed as Unalienable rights to life, liberty, pursue happiness and acquire property, with labor being property.

1012(aa)(4) of TAMRA. Since the year at issue in this case is 1987, the provisions are applied retroactively to petitioner. The Court finds that this period of retroactivity is a modest one and does not violate petitioner's right of due process. Tate & Lyle v. Commissioner, 103 T.C. 656, 675 (1994) (quoting U.S. v. Carlton, 512 U.S. ___, ___,

Santangelo v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1995-468 · 1995

* * * * * * * Knowing that services (labor) are property * * * , nothing excludes services from the provisions of § 1012[4] as a cost that must be restored to the 3 Sec.

1012; Simmonds Precision Prods. v. Commissioner, 75 T.C. 103, 115 (1980). Expenses incurred in the transaction are also properly included in basis. Sec. 1016(a). We applied this general rule in the similar situation presented in International Telephone & Telegraph v. Commissioner, supra, wherein we held the debentures had a basis to ITT equal

Reynoso v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2013-25 · 2013
Holmes v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2012-251 · 2012
Tom & Louise Kappus, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-36 · 2002
Norwest Corp. v. Commissioner 111 T.C. 105 · 1998
Robert A. & Susan Stanford, Petitioner 108 T.C. No. 17 · 1997
Talmage v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1996-114 · 1996
Bertoli v. Commissioner 103 T.C. 501 · 1994
Meredith Corp. v. Commissioner 102 T.C. 406 · 1994
Estate of Frane v. Commissioner 98 T.C. 341 · 1992
Lindsey v. Commissioner 98 T.C. 672 · 1992
Jacobson v. Commissioner 96 T.C. 577 · 1991
Schulman v. Commissioner 93 T.C. 623 · 1989
UFE, Inc. v. Commissioner 92 T.C. 1314 · 1989
Estate of Leavitt v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 206 · 1988
Tolwinsky v. Commissioner 86 T.C. 1009 · 1986
Banc One Corp. v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 476 · 1985
Beard v. Commissioner 82 T.C. 766 · 1984
Foster v. Commissioner 80 T.C. 34 · 1983
Brannen v. Commissioner 78 T.C. 471 · 1982
O'Brien v. Commissioner 79 T.C. 776 · 1982
Zuanich v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 428 · 1981
Hudson v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 468 · 1981
Lemmen v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 1326 · 1981
Reinhardt v. Commissioner 75 T.C. 47 · 1980
Davis v. Commissioner 74 T.C. 881 · 1980
Faura v. Commissioner 73 T.C. 849 · 1980
Pfalzgraf v. Commissioner 67 T.C. 784 · 1977
Haynsworth v. Commissioner 68 T.C. 703 · 1977
Gamble v. Commissioner 68 T.C. 800 · 1977
Roemer v. Commissioner 69 T.C. 440 · 1977
Templeton v. Commissioner 66 T.C. 509 · 1976
Ternovsky v. Commissioner 66 T.C. 695 · 1976
Hill v. Commissioner 66 T.C. 701 · 1976
Carrieres v. Commissioner 64 T.C. 959 · 1975
Betts v. Commissioner 62 T.C. 536 · 1974
Yoc Heating Corp. v. Commissioner 61 T.C. 168 · 1973
Bolger v. Commissioner 59 T.C. 760 · 1973
Wiebusch v. Commissioner 59 T.C. 777 · 1973
Fehrs Finance Co. v. Commissioner 58 T.C. 174 · 1972
Bixby v. Commissioner 58 T.C. 757 · 1972
Morris v. Commissioner 59 T.C. 21 · 1972
Enoch v. Commissioner 57 T.C. 781 · 1972
Hoven v. Commissioner 56 T.C. 50 · 1971
Estate of Morris v. Commissioner 55 T.C. 636 · 1971
Alderman v. Commissioner 55 T.C. 662 · 1971
Malkan v. Commissioner 54 T.C. 1305 · 1970
Victor Meat Co. v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 929 · 1969
Vaira v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 986 · 1969
Mushro v. Commissioner 50 T.C. 43 · 1968
Borg v. Commissioner 50 T.C. 257 · 1968
Osrow v. Commissioner 49 T.C. 333 · 1968
Schultz v. Commissioner 50 T.C. 688 · 1968
Plowden v. Commissioner 48 T.C. 666 · 1967
Crane v. Commissioner 45 T.C. 397 · 1966
Raich v. Commissioner 46 T.C. 604 · 1966
Dix v. Commissioner 46 T.C. 796 · 1966
Murphy v. Commissioner 41 T.C. 608 · 1964
Philbrick v. Commissioner 38 T.C. 666 · 1962
Reisner v. Commissioner 34 T.C. 1122 · 1960
Kendall v. Commissioner 31 T.C. 549 · 1958
Thorrez v. Commissioner 31 T.C. 655 · 1958
Nathel v. Commissioner 615 F.3d 83 · Cir.
United States v. Bergbauer 602 F.3d 569 · Cir.
Washington Mut. Inc. v. United States 636 F.3d 1207 · Cir.
Superior Trading, LLC v. Commissioner 728 F.3d 676 · Cir.
Illinois Lumber & Material Dealers Ass'n Health Insurance Trust v. United States 794 F.3d 907 · Cir.
Maloof v. CIR · Cir.
Cap Blue Cross v. Commissioner IRS · Cir.
Estate of Alton Bean v. CIR 268 F.3d 553 · Cir.
United States v. Ezell Brown, Jr. 898 F.3d 636 · Cir.
United States v. Hildenbrand 527 F.3d 466 · Cir.
Estate of Alton Bean, Deceased Gary A. Bean, Administrator Mable Bean v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Gary A. Bean Cynthia Bean v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 268 F.3d 553 · Cir.
Capital Blue Cross and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 431 F.3d 117 · Cir.
The Black & Decker Corporation v. United States 436 F.3d 431 · Cir.
William H. Maloof v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 456 F.3d 645 · Cir.
Life Partners, Incorporated v. Theodore v. Morrison, Jr. Mark C. Christie, in Their Official Capacities as Commissioners of the State Corporation Commission Alfred W. Gross, in His Official Capacity as the Commissioner of Insurance Judith Williams Jagdmann, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the State Corporation Commission, Robert F. McDonnell in His Official Capacity as the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Intervenor-Appellee, and Clinton Miller, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the State Corporation Commission, National Association of Insurance Commissioners North American Securities Administrators Association, Incorporated, Amici Supporting and Viatical Settlement Professionals, Incorporated, Movant. Life Partners, Incorporated v. Theodore v. Morrison, Jr. Mark C. Christie, in Their Official Capacities as Commissioners of the State Corporation Commission Alfred W. Gross, in His Official Capacity as the Commissioner of Insurance Judith Williams Jagdmann, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the State Corporation Commission, and Clinton Miller, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the State Corporation Commission, and Robert F. McDonnell in His Official Capacity as the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Intervenor-Defendant. North American Securities Administrators Association, Incorporated National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Amici Supporting and Viatical Settlement Professionals, Incorporated, Movant 484 F.3d 284 · Cir.
Neal Crispin v. Commissioner of Internal Reven 708 F.3d 507 · Cir.
Life Partners, Inc. v. Morrison 484 F.3d 284 · Cir.
Neal Crispin v. Commissioner of Internal Reven · Cir.
United States v. State of Delaware Department o 66 F.4th 114 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.