§1022 — Repealed. Pub. L. 111–312, title III, § 301(a), Dec. 17, 2010, 124 Stat. 3300]

22 cases·1 followed·1 distinguished·1 overruled·19 cited5% support

[§ 1022. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–312, title III, § 301(a), Dec. 17, 2010, 124 Stat. 3300] Section, added Pub. L. 107–16, title V, § 542(a), June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 76, related to treatment of property acquired from a decedent dying after Dec. 31, 2009. A prior section 1022, added Pub. L. 88–272, title II, § 225(j)(1), Feb. 26, 1964, 78 Stat. 92, dealt with the increase in basis with respect to certain foreign personal holding company stock or securities, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, § 1901(a)(126), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1784, applicable with respect to stock or securities acquired from a decedent dying after Oct. 4, 1976. Another prior section 1022, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 302, relating to cross references, was renumbered section 1023. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries Effective Date of RepealRepeal of section applicable to estates of decedents dying, and transfers made after Dec. 31, 2009, except as otherwise provided, see section 301(e) of Pub. L. 111–312, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2010 Amendment note under section 121 of this title.

22 Citing Cases

Burt Kroner, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2024-41 · 2024

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION MARVEL, Judge: In Kroner I, we upheld respondent’s determination that transfers of funds to petitioner, Burt Kroner, during 2005–07 (years at issue) did not constitute gifts under section 1022 and that Mr.

1022(a), 98 Stat. 1026, was a permanent rule to replace various temporary reformation provisions that preceded it and is effective for reformations made after Dec. 31, 1978. - 10 - reformation" for this purpose "means a change of a governing instrument by reformation, amendment, construction, or otherwise which changes a reformable interest i

ract if such computation employs the reserve practice used for purposes of the most recent annual statement filed on or before March 1, 1986, for the type of contract with respect to which such reserves are set up. [H.R. 3838, 99th Cong., 2d Sess., sec. 1022(e)(3)(B), as reported by the Senate Finance Committee on May 29, 1986.] The Finance Committee report stated that "reserve strengthening" consisted of "any adjustments to reserves that are attributable to changes in reserves on account of cha

Burstein v. Retirement Account Plan for Employees of Allegheny Health Education & Research Foundation 334 F.3d 365 · Cir.
Lonecke v. CitiGroup Pension Plan 584 F.3d 457 · Cir.
William Lee v. Verizon Communications, Inc. 837 F.3d 523 · Cir.
Estate of Hall v. Commissioner 93 T.C. 745 · 1989
Boggs v. Commissioner 83 T.C. 132 · 1984
Estate of Dawson v. Commissioner 57 T.C. 837 · 1972
United States v. Freeman · Cir.
Robinson v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund 515 F.3d 93 · Cir.
In Re: Citigroup Pension Plan ERISA · Cir.
McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp. 482 F.3d 184 · Cir.
Robinson v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund Plan A · Cir.
Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Zaragoza-Gomez 834 F.3d 110 · Cir.
Martinez v. Sun Life Assurance Co. 948 F.3d 62 · Cir.
Gary Williams v. Unum Life Insurance Co. 11 F.4th 641 · Cir.
David T. Hunter (99-3620) Robert Allison (99-3623) v. Caliber System, Inc., F/k/a Roadway Services, Inc. 220 F.3d 702 · Cir.
William H. Burstein, M.D. v. Retirement Account Plan For Employees Of Allegheny Health Education And Research Foundation 334 F.3d 365 · Cir.
Walter Dean v. National Production Workers Un 46 F.4th 535 · Cir.
McCARTHY v. DUN & BRADSTREET CORPORATION 482 F.3d 184 · Cir.
United States v. Davis 53 F.4th 833 · Cir.