§1052 — Basis established by the Revenue Act of 1932 or 1934 or by the Internal Revenue Code of 1939

9 citing cases

(a)Revenue Act of 1932

If the property was acquired, after February 28, 1913, in any taxable year beginning before January 1, 1934, and the basis thereof, for purposes of the Revenue Act of 1932 was prescribed by section 113(a)(6), (7), or (9) of such Act (47 Stat. 199), then for purposes of this subtitle the basis shall be the same as the basis therein prescribed in the Revenue Act of 1932.

(b)Revenue Act of 1934

If the property was acquired, after February 28, 1913, in any taxable year beginning before January 1, 1936, and the basis thereof, for purposes of the Revenue Act of 1934, was prescribed by section 113(a)(6), (7), or (8) of such Act (48 Stat. 706), then for purposes of this subtitle the basis shall be the same as the basis therein prescribed in the Revenue Act of 1934.

(c)Internal Revenue Code of 1939

If the property was acquired, after February 28, 1913, in a transaction to which the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 applied, and the basis thereof, for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, was prescribed by section 113(a)(6), (7), (8), (13), (15), (18), (19), or (23) of such code, then for purposes of this subtitle the basis shall be the same as the basis therein prescribed in the Internal Revenue Code of 1939.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1052-1Basis of property established by Revenue Act of 1932 Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Section 1052(a) provides that if property was acquired after February 28, 1913, in any taxable year beginning before January 1, 1934, and the basis of the property, for the purposes of the Revenue Act of 1932 (47 Stat. 169), was prescribed by section 113(a) (6), (7), or (9) of that act, then for purposes of subtitle A of the Code, the basis shall be the same as the basis prescribed in the Revenue Act of 1932. For the rules applicable in determining the basis of stocks or securities under section 113(a)(9) of the Revenue Act of 1932 in case of certain distributions after December 31, 1923, and in any taxable year beginning before January 1, 1934, see 26 CFR (1939) 39.113 (a)(12)-1 (Regulations 118).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1052-2Basis of property established by Revenue Act of 1934 Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Section 1052(b) provides that if property was acquired after February 28, 1913, in any taxable year beginning before January 1, 1936, and the basis of the property for the purposes of the Revenue Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 683) was prescribed by section 113(a) (6), (7), or (8) of that act, then for purposes of subtitle A of the Code, the basis shall be the same as the basis prescribed in the Revenue Act of 1934. For example, if after December 31, 1920, and in any taxable year beginning before January 1, 1936, property was acquired by a corporation by the issuance of its stock or securities in connection with a transaction which is not described in section 112(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 but which is described in section 112(b)(5) of the Revenue Act of 1934, the basis of the property so acquired shall be the same as it would be in the hands of the transferor, with proper adjustments to the date of the exchange.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1052-3Basis of property established by the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Section 1052(c) provides that if property was acquired after February 28, 1913, in a transaction to which the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 applied and the basis thereof was prescribed by section 113(a) (6), (7), (8), (13), (15), (18), (19) or (23) of such Code, then for purposes of subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, the basis shall be the same as the basis prescribed in the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. In such cases, see section 113(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 and the regulations thereunder.

9 Citing Cases

1647-48. - 104 - their view ofgood tax policy. They simply tell us to treat things as what they really are, no matter what taxpayers call them. When Congress created FSCs and Roth IRAs, it said they didn't need economic substance and taxpayers who used them didn't need to have a nontax purpose. As long as taxpayers comply with

1647-48. - 104 - their view ofgood tax policy. They simply tell us to treat things as what they really are, no matter what taxpayers call them. When Congress created FSCs and Roth IRAs, it said they didn't need economic substance and taxpayers who used them didn't need to have a nontax purpose. As long as taxpayers comply with

Induni v. Commissioner 98 T.C. 618 · 1992
The Last Best Beef, LLC v. Dudas 506 F.3d 333 · Cir.
Edes v. Verizon Communications, Inc. 417 F.3d 133 · Cir.
The Board of Trustees of the Equity-League Pension Trust Fund v. Cheryl Royce, and Kate MacLeod 238 F.3d 177 · Cir.
Harrods Limited v. Sixty Internet Domain Names 302 F.3d 214 · Cir.
John Bauer v. Summit Bancorp 325 F.3d 155 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.