§1053 — Property acquired before March 1, 1913

31 citing cases

In the case of property acquired before March 1, 1913, if the basis otherwise determined under this subtitle, adjusted (for the period before March 1, 1913) as provided in section 1016, is less than the fair market value of the property as of March 1, 1913, then the basis for determining gain shall be such fair market value. In determining the fair market value of stock in a corporation as of March 1, 1913, due regard shall be given to the fair market value of the assets of the corporation as of that date.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1053-1Property acquired before March 1, 1913 Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) Basis for determining gain. In the case of property acquired before March 1, 1913, the basis as of March 1, 1913, for determining gain is the cost or other basis, adjusted as provided in section 1016 and other applicable provisions of chapter 1 of the Code, or its fair market value as of March 1, 1913, whichever is greater.

    (b) Basis for determining loss. In the case of property acquired before March 1, 1913, the basis as of March 1, 1913, for determining loss is the basis determined in accordance with part II (section 1011 and following), subchapter O, chapter 1 of the Code, or other applicable provisions of chapter 1 of the Code, without reference to the fair market value as of March 1, 1913.

    (c) Example. The application of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section may be illustrated by the following example:

    (d) Fair market value. The determination of the fair market value of property on March 1, 1913, is generally a question of fact and shall be established by competent evidence. In determining the fair market value of stock or other securities, due regard shall be given to the fair market value of the corporate assets as of such date, and other pertinent factors. In the case of property traded in on public exchanges, actual sales on or near the basic date afford evidence of value. In general, the fair market value of a block or aggregate of a particular kind of property is not to be determined by a forced-sale price, or by an estimate of what a whole block or aggregate would bring if placed upon the market at one and the same time. In such a case the value should be determined by ascertaining as the basis the fair market value of each unit of the property. All relevant facts and elements of value as of the basic date should be considered in each case.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1053-1(a)Basis for determining gain. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Basis for determining gain. In the case of property acquired before March 1, 1913, the basis as of March 1, 1913, for determining gain is the cost or other basis, adjusted as provided in section 1016 and other applicable provisions of chapter 1 of the Code, or its fair market value as of March 1, 1913, whichever is greater.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1053-1(b)Basis for determining loss. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Basis for determining loss. In the case of property acquired before March 1, 1913, the basis as of March 1, 1913, for determining loss is the basis determined in accordance with part II (section 1011 and following), subchapter O, chapter 1 of the Code, or other applicable provisions of chapter 1 of the Code, without reference to the fair market value as of March 1, 1913.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1053-1(c)Example. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Example. The application of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section may be illustrated by the following example:

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1053-1(d)Fair market value. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Fair market value. The determination of the fair market value of property on March 1, 1913, is generally a question of fact and shall be established by competent evidence. In determining the fair market value of stock or other securities, due regard shall be given to the fair market value of the corporate assets as of such date, and other pertinent factors. In the case of property traded in on public exchanges, actual sales on or near the basic date afford evidence of value. In general, the fair market value of a block or aggregate of a particular kind of property is not to be determined by a forced-sale price, or by an estimate of what a whole block or aggregate would bring if placed upon the market at one and the same time. In such a case the value should be determined by ascertaining as the basis the fair market value of each unit of the property. All relevant facts and elements of value as of the basic date should be considered in each case.

31 Citing Cases

* * *[11] Since section 167(g)12 requires the same basis used for determining gain to be used as the basis for amortization, it follows that the amortization of an intangible asset held on March 1, 1913, will be based on the fair market value of the asset as of that date if that value is higher than the adjusted 11The regulations indicate that sec. 1053 and related Code sections provide a dual-basis rule similar to DEFRA sec. 177(d)(2) with respect to property held as of Mar. 1, 1913. The basis

The basis rules which finally developed for property held on, and acquired before, that date are contained in section 1053, which provides: SEC.

When an employee’s accrued retirement benefit is vested, it is nonforfeitable. Thus, a participant in a defined benefit plan (such as the Plan) is fully vested when he or she has a nonforfeitable right to 100 percent of the accrued benefit. An employee’s accrued benefit at any given time is what a fully vested employee would be entitl

Section 901(k)(1) provides that a taxpayer must hold stock (or an ADR) for at least 16 days of a prescribed 30-day period including the dividend record date, in order to claim a foreign tax credit with respect to foreign taxes withheld at the source on foreign dividends.

Foster v. Commissioner 80 T.C. 34 · 1983
Goodwin v. Commissioner 73 T.C. 215 · 1979
Duke v. Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp. · Cir.
Laurent v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 794 F.3d 272 · Cir.
Brengettsy, Frank M. v. LTV Steel · Cir.
Heinz, Thomas E. v. Central Laborers Pen · Cir.
Berger, David v. Xerox Retirement · Cir.
Matz, Robert v. Household Int'l Tax · Cir.
Jennifer Durand v. The Hanover Insurance Group 806 F.3d 367 · Cir.
Sheilar Smith v. OSF Healthcare System 933 F.3d 859 · Cir.
Sheilar Smith v. OSF Healthcare System · Cir.
Sheilar Smith v. OSF Healthcare System · Cir.
United States v. Kahn · Cir.
United States v. Kahn 5 F.4th 167 · Cir.
Donna Browe v. CTC Corp. · Cir.
SEC v. Hallam · Cir.
Becker v. Mack Trucks, Inc. 281 F.3d 372 · Cir.
Stoll v. Western & Southern Life Insurance 64 F. App'x 986 · Cir.
David T. Hunter (99-3620) Robert Allison (99-3623) v. Caliber System, Inc., F/k/a Roadway Services, Inc. 220 F.3d 702 · Cir.
Frank M. Brengettsy, on His Own Behalf and That of All Others Similarly Situated v. Ltv Steel (Republic) Hourly Pension Plan, 1 241 F.3d 609 · Cir.
Larry Becker v. Mack Trucks, Inc. 281 F.3d 372 · Cir.
Thomas E. Heinz and Richard J. Schmitt, Jr. v. Central Laborers' Pension Fund 303 F.3d 802 · Cir.
David Berger and Gerry Tsupros, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. Xerox Corporation Retirement Income Guarantee Plan 338 F.3d 755 · Cir.
Robert J. Matz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Household International Tax Reduction Investment Plan, Cross-Appellee 388 F.3d 570 · Cir.
David McCorkle v. Bank of America Corporation 688 F.3d 164 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.