§109 — Improvements by lessee on lessor’s property

65 cases·5 followed·6 distinguished·1 overruled·53 cited8% support

Gross income does not include income (other than rent) derived by a lessor of real property on the termination of a lease, representing the value of such property attributable to buildings erected or other improvements made by the lessee.

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.109-1 Exclusion from gross income of lessor of real property of value of improvements erected by lessee
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.109-1(a) Income derived by a lessor of real property upon the termination, through forfeiture or otherwise, of the lease of such property and attributable to buildings erected or other improvements made by the lessee upon the leased property is excluded from gross income.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.109-1(b) §1.109-1(b)

65 Citing Cases

DIST. Barnes Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2013-109 · 2013

Respondent asserts that the 1985 agreement is purely a services agreement and that section 109 is inapplicable.

Richard J. & Carol C. Spera, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1998-225 · 1998

Petitioners argue that section 109 specifically removes the expenditures at issue from the definition of gross income, and that GRC's expenditures are thereby not income to petitioners.

Section 108(a)(1)(E) provides that gross income does not include amounts which would be includible as COD income if"the indebtedness discharged is qualified principal residence indebtedness".

463 - 5 - (1997). In cases involving failure to report income, the Court ofAppeals for the Ninth Circuit, to which an appeal in this case would ordinarily lie, see sec. 7482(b)(1)(A), has held that the Commissioner must establish "some evidentiary foundation" linking the taxpayerto an alleged income-producing activity before the presump

109(b), 75 Stat. at 534-535 (codified as amended at 8 U.S.C. sec. 1101(a)(15)(J) (2006)). J-1 visa status in and ofitselfsupports one element ofArticle 18: that the individual be "temporarilypresent" in the country. It also may support a finding that an individual with such a visa is "studying" or "doing research". Petitioner, for example, is

463 (1997). The income is recognized for the year in which the debt is canceled. Montgomery v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 511, 520 (1975). Petitioner argues that although the cancellation ofdebt generally creates reportable income her canceled debt is excludable. Some "accessions to wealth that would ordinarily constitute income may be exclud

1, - 8 - 1986, under subsection (m) of section 167”.1 Section 167(m)(1), in pertinent part, provided for depreciation “based on the class life prescribed by the Secretary which reasonably reflects the anticipated useful life of that class of property to the industry or other group.” Section 167(m) (which was added to the Internal Revenue Code by section 109 of the Revenue Act of 1971, Pub.

ness requirement.” The same statutory language has been in the predecessors of section 936 since the initial enactment--section 262 of the Revenue Act of 1921, Pub. L. 67-98, 42 Stat. 227, 271. The same statutory language was in the WHTC provisions--sec. 109, I.R.C. 1939. Essentially the same argument was presented to, and rejected by, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Frank v. International Canadian Corp., 308 F.2d at 526-527. In our recent opinion in MedChem (P.R.), Inc. v. Commiss

ness requirement.” The same statutory language has been in the predecessors of section 936 since the initial enactment--section 262 of the Revenue Act of 1921, Pub. L. 67-98, 42 Stat. 227, 271. The same statutory language was in the WHTC provisions--sec. 109, I.R.C. 1939. Essentially the same argument was presented to, and rejected by, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Frank v. International Canadian Corp., 308 F.2d at 526-527. In our recent opinion in MedChem (P.R.), Inc. v. Commiss

Michael A. & Frances Y. McGrath, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-231 · 2002

derived not only from the terms of the lease but from the surrounding circumstances. This is recognized by the respondent in his published ruling I.T. 4009, 1950-1 C.B. 13. - 18 - To the same effect, see sec. 1.61-8(c), Income Tax Regs;12 see also sec. 109. The parties have stipulated that this exception applies to allow petitioners rent expense deductions of $3,123 for 1995 and $15,616 for 1996, for otherwise capital expenditures. This is founded on the parties’ stipulation that “$18,739.00 of

Clajon Gas Co. v. Commissioner 119 T.C. 197 · 2002

Section 167(m)(l), in pertinent part, provided for depreciation “based on the class life prescribed by the Secretary which reasonably reflects the anticipated useful life of that class of property to the industry or other group.” Section 167(m) (which was added to the Internal Revenue Code by section 109 of the Revenue Act of 1971, Pub.

ss requirement.” The same statutory language has been in the predecessors of section 936 since the initial enactment — section 262 of the Revenue Act of 1921, Pub. L. 67-98, 42 Stat. 227, 271. The same statutory language was in the WHTC provisions — sec. 109, I.R.C. 1939. Essentially the same argument was presented to, and rejected by, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Frank v. International Canadian Corp., 308 F.2d at 526-527. In our recent opinion in MedChem (P.R.), Inc. v. Commiss

Blatt Co. v. United States, 305 U.S. 267 (1938); Bardes v. Commissioner, 37 T.C. 1134 (1962); Spera v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-225; Weigel v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-485. In this case, however, we have determined that the improvements on the land were made to property that was not leased to Holland America; i.e., the land

Ins. Code sec. 700 (West 1993) provides: §700. Admittance required; penalties; compliance; hearings; issuance of certificate (a) A person shall not transact any class of insurance business in this state without first being admitted for that class. Admission is secured by procuring a certificate of authority from the commissioner.

Ronald Neil & Makbule Robinson, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-154 · 1996

86). In 1980, Congress enacted the Defense Officer Personnel Management Act, Pub. L. 96-513, 94 Stat. 2835, which amended the separation pay recoupment statute, replacing the 75-percent recoupment with total recoupment. See Pub. L. 96-513, Title I, sec. 109(c), 94 Stat. 2870, 2871 (1980) (effective Sept. 15, 1981) (codified at 10 U.S.C. sec. 1174(h)(2)). No alternative provision was established to relieve the imbalance of recouping taxable separation pay with nontaxable disability compensation,

Tobias v. Commissioner 40 T.C. 84 · 1963
Walgreen Co. v. Commissioner 103 T.C. 582 · 1994
Medchem (P.R.), Inc. v. Commissioner 295 F.3d 118 · Cir.
California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Worldcom, Inc. 368 F.3d 86 · Cir.
California Public Employees' Retirement System v. WorldCom, Inc. 368 F.3d 86 · Cir.
Estate of Hall v. Commissioner 93 T.C. 745 · 1989
Bardes v. Commissioner 37 T.C. 1134 · 1962
United States v. Dixon 648 F.3d 195 · Cir.
Elias v. Commissioner 100 T.C. 510 · 1993
Armco, Inc. v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 946 · 1987
Robinson v. Commissioner 82 T.C. 444 · 1984
Connelly v. Commissioner 82 T.C. 608 · 1984
Felman v. Commissioner 49 T.C. 599 · 1968
Haag v. Commissioner 40 T.C. 488 · 1963
Munson v. Commissioner 36 T.C. 953 · 1961
OPAWL · Cir.
Pack Expo Services, LLC v. Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pensi · Cir.
Event Media Inc. v. Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pensi · Cir.
Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas v. Event Media Inc. 135 F.4th 529 · Cir.
Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pensi v. Pack Expo Services, LLC · Cir.
Pack Expo Services, LLC v. Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pensi · Cir.
Event Media Inc. v. Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pensi · Cir.
Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas v. Event Media Inc. · Cir.
Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pensi v. Pack Expo Services, LLC · Cir.
Listecki Ex Rel. Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Cemetery Perpetual Care Trust v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors 780 F.3d 731 · Cir.
Official Committee of Unsecure v. Rudolph Randa · Cir.
Gerald Taylor v. United States · Cir.
Anders Knudsen v. Internal Revenue Service · Cir.
State of Texas v. USA · Cir.
State of Texas v. USA 809 F.3d 134 · Cir.
Ky. Emps. Ret. Sys. v. Seven Counties Servs., Inc. 901 F.3d 718 · Cir.
DaVita, Inc. v. Marietta Mem. Hosp. 978 F.3d 326 · Cir.
Gun Owners of America, Inc. v. Merrick B. Garland 992 F.3d 446 · Cir.
In Re: Gerald E. Taylor Betty Taylor, Debtors. Gerald E. Taylor Betty A. Taylor v. United States 212 F.3d 395 · Cir.
In Re Kenneth Allen Knight Trust, Debtor. Angela Lynn Brady-Morris Denise Michele Brady v. J. Baxter Schilling, Trustee 303 F.3d 671 · Cir.
United States v. Jamar Lewis 58 F.4th 764 · Cir.
Apache Stronghold v. USA 95 F.4th 608 · Cir.
Apache Stronghold v. USA · Cir.
Apache Stronghold v. USA · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.