§116 — Repealed. Pub. L. 99–514, title VI, § 612(a), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2250]
119 cases·8 followed·13 distinguished·1 questioned·3 criticized·1 limited·93 cited—7% support
Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §116
[§ 116. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–514, title VI, § 612(a), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2250] Section, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 37; June 25, 1959, Pub. L. 86–69, § 3(a)(2), 73 Stat. 139; Sept. 14, 1960, Pub. L. 86–779, § 10(f), 74 Stat. 1009; Feb. 26, 1964, Pub. L. 88–272, title II, § 201(c), (d)(6)(C), 78 Stat. 32; Nov. 13, 1966, Pub. L. 89–809, title I, § 103(g), 80 Stat. 1552; Oct. 4, 1976, Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §§ 1051(h)(2), 1053(d)(1), title XIX, § 1901(a)(20), 90 Stat. 1647, 1649, 1766; Apr. 2, 1980, Pub. L. 96–223, title IV, § 404(a), 94 Stat. 305; Aug. 13, 1981, Pub. L. 97–34, title III, § 302(b)(2), 95 Stat. 272; July 18, 1984, Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title V, § 542(b), 98 Stat. 891, authorized partial exclusion of dividends received by individuals. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries Effective Date of RepealRepeal applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1986, see section 612(c) of Pub. L. 99–514, set out as an Effective Date of 1986 Amendment note under section 301 of this title.
119 Citing Cases
The public policy concerns that underpin the pre-existing duty rule do not seem to be present here." In addition, we do not agree with respondent that section 1.460-1(b)(2), Income Tax Regs., codifies the preexisting duty rule.
The public policy concerns that underpin the pre-existing duty rule do not seem to be present here." In addition, we do not agree with respondent that section 1.460-1(b)(2), Income Tax Regs., codifies the preexisting duty rule.
That certification is not presented in subsection (a) as one of the conditions for the exemption; and, section 893 .does not explicitly provide that the wages shall be 17 - exempt only "if" the Secretary certifies reciprocity ( unlike the social security tax provisions , discussed next) . C . Employment tax statutes The income tax provision in section 893 may be contrasted with the corresponding employment tax provisions . In the 1930s as now, the income tax and employment taxes were distinct ;
Section 116 of the Revenue Act of 1934 was amended to add a new subsection (h), as follows: SEC. 116. EXCLUSIONS FROM GROSS INCOME. In addition to the items specified in section 22(b), the following items shall not be included in gross income and shall be exempt from taxation under this title: ******* (h) Compensation of Employees of Foreign Govern
6); Pub. L. No. 109-280, secs. 1202(a), 1204(a), 1206(a), (b)(1), 1213(a)(1), (b)-(d), 1214(a) and (b), 1215(a), 1216(a), 1217(a), 1218(a), 1219(c)(1), 1234(a), 120 Stat. at 1066, 1068, 1075, 1077, 1079, 1080, 1085, 1100 (2006); Pub. L. No. 109-432, sec. 116(a)(1), (b)(1) and (2), 120 Stat. at 2941 (2006); Pub. L. No. 110-172, secs. 3(c), 11(a)(l4)(A) and (B), (l5) and (l6), 121 Stat. at 2474, 2485 (2007); Pub. L. No. 110-234, sec. 15302(a), 122 Stat. at 1501 (2008); Pub. L. No. 110-246, secs. 4
116 (2006); see also 23 U.S.C. sec. 101(a) (31) (2006) (defining the word "Secretary" for purposes of tit. 23 as dhe "Secretary of Transportation"). !i - 5 - $259,156) as DPGR and claimed a $63,435 deduction under section 199.5 Respondent determined that -petitioner could not deduct the $63,435 because petitioner had no DPGR. Petitioner place
116 (2006); see also id. sec. 101(a)(31) (defining the word “Secretary” for purposes of tit. 23 as the “Secretary of Transportation”). Petitioner used the percentage of completion method under sec. 460 to compute its taxable income. Respondent concedes in his opening brief that petitioner’s work on the bridges met the first prong but advances
116(c) (West 1993); Clemens v. American Warranty Corp., 238 Cal. Rptf. 339, 344-345 (Ct. App. 1987). Petitioners state on brief that they are not in the insurance business. - 29 - On this record, petitioners have failed to show error in respondent's determination insofar as it is premised on the conclusion that petitioners purchased insurance
116(c) (West 1993); Clemens v. American Warranty Corp., 238 Cal. Rptr. 339, 344-345 (Ct. App. 1987). Petitioners state on brief that they are not in the insurance business. - 29 - On this record, petitioners have failed to show error in respondent's determination insofar as it is premised on the conclusion that petitioners purchased insurance
116(c) (West 1993); Clemens v. American Warranty Corp., 238 Cal. Rptr. 339, 344-345 (Ct. App. 1987). Petitioners state on brief that they are not :ba the insurance business. - 29 - On this record, petitioners have failed to show error in respondent's determination insofar as it is premised on the conclusion that petitioners purchased insuranc
116(c) (West 1993); Clemens v. American Warranty Corp., 238 Cal. Rptr. 339, 344-345 (Ct. App. 1987). Petitioners state on brief that they are not :ba the insurance business. - 29 - On this record, petitioners have failed to show error in respondent's determination insofar as it is premised on the conclusion that petitioners purchased insuranc