§122 — Certain reduced uniformed services retirement pay

157 cases·20 followed·12 distinguished·2 criticized·1 limited·4 overruled·118 cited13% support

(a)General rule

In the case of a member or former member of the uniformed services of the United States, gross income does not include the amount of any reduction in his retired or retainer pay pursuant to the provisions of chapter 73 of title 10, United States Code.

(b)Special rule
(1)Amount excluded from gross income

In the case of any individual referred to in subsection (a), all amounts received as retired or retainer pay shall be excluded from gross income until there has been so excluded an amount equal to the consideration for the contract. The preceding sentence shall apply only to the extent that the amounts received would, but for such sentence, be includible in gross income.

(2)Consideration for the contract

For purposes of paragraph (1) and section 72(n), the term “consideration for the contract” means, in respect of any individual, the sum of—

(A)

the total amount of the reductions before

January 1, 1966

, in his retired or retainer pay by reason of an election under chapter 73 of title 10 of the United States Code, and

(B)

any amounts deposited at any time by him pursuant to section 1438 or 1452(d) of such title 10.

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.122-1 Applicable rules relating to certain reduced uniformed services retirement pay
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.122-1(a) §1.122-1(a)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.122-1(b) §1.122-1(b)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.122-1(c) Special rules.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.122-1(d) Examples with respect to the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.122-1(e) Principles applicable to the Survivor Benefit Plan.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.122-1(i) An election made under the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (10 U.

157 Citing Cases

In Reise we thereupon overruled Aaron and reaffirmed the position we took in Polk that the interest on the tax underpayment was attributable to the taxpayer’s trade or business.

OVERRULED James E. & Cheryl L. Redlark, Petitioner 106 T.C. No. 2 · 1996

We applied the rationale of Polk and Standing, and we overruled Aaron as an improper and incorrect construction of section 122(d)(5) of the 1939 Code.4 Id.

Section 122 provides for an exclusion for the amount ofany reduction in an individual's military retirement pay pursuant to the individual's survivor's annuity election.

FOLLOWED Omar J. Nasir, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-283 · 2011

The offer-in-compromise was a 24-mont short-term periodic payment offer made pursuant to section 122(c) (1) (B).

FOLLOWED Bruce A. & Donna M. Rice, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2009-142 · 2009

We hold that the excess lots were-held for investment purposes and the proceeds are capital gains and losses .

ection with this case. 3The Court held a telephone conference with the parties on June 29, 2016, to clarify the issues in the case. Petitioner conceded the military retirement pay at issue was not excludable from gross income under sec. 104(a)(4) or sec. 122. Respondent conceded the accuracy-related penalty for an underpayment due to a substantial understatement ofincome tax under sec. 6662(a) and (b)(2). The Court issued an order dated June 30, 2016, confirming the sole remaining issue. 3 Backg

Uniband, Inc., Petitioner 140 T.C. No. 13 · 2013

122 (2011) (emphasis added). Uniband does not explain what might trump this statutory provision. Moreover, Uniband was established as a Delaware corporation in 1987 by TMBCI and a third-party not affiliated with TMBCI, and for three years TMBCI held only 51% ofUniband. Thus, TMBCI did not establish Uniband by itself; at its inception Uniband w

Uniband, Inc. v. Commissioner 140 T.C. 230 · 2013

122 (2011) (emphasis added). Uniband does not explain what might trump this statutory provision. Moreover, Uniband was established as a Delaware corporation in 1987 by TMBCI and a third party not affiliated with TMBCI, and for three years TMBCI held only 51% of Uniband. Thus, TMBCI did not establish Uniband by itself; at its inception Uniband

Alden J. & Nancy E. Appleton, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2010-225 · 2010

Bank of San Diego, 48 P.2d 39 (Cal. 1935); Cal. Natl. Bank of Sacramento v. El Dorado Lime & Minerals Co., 2 P.2d 785, 786 (Cal. 1931); H.D. Roosen -Co. v. Pac. Radio Publq. Co., 11 P.2d 873, 876 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932); see also 75 C.J.S.,.Receivers, sec. 122 (2002). While a debtor's assets are in receivership, creditors are prohibited from taking any action that would interfere with a receiver's possession or - 4 - control of the assets, but creditors are permitted.to take action that does not i

122(c) of the Act. The Internal Revenue Code of 1954 substituted for this a formula deduction resulting in a 14- percentage-point tax rate reduction. See sec. 922, I.R.C. 1954. The WHTC provisions, I.R.C. 1954 secs. 921 and 922, were repealed by sec. 1052(b) of the Tax Reform Act of 1976, Pub. L. 94-455, 90 Stat. 1520, 1648. Several opinions o

122(c) of the Act. The Internal Revenue Code of 1954 substituted for this a formula deduction resulting in a 14- percentage-point tax rate reduction. See sec. 922, I.R.C. 1954. The WHTC provisions, I.R.C. 1954 secs. 921 and 922, were repealed by sec. 1052(b) of the Tax Reform Act of 1976, Pub. L. 94-455, 90 Stat. 1520, 1648. Several opinions o

122(c) of the Act. The Internal Revenue Code of 1954 substituted for this a formula deduction resulting in a 14-percentage-point tax rate reduction. See sec. 922, I.R.C. 1954. The WHTC provisions, secs. 921 and 922, I.R.C. 1954, were repealed by section 1052(b) of the Tax Reform Act of 1976, Pub. L. 94-455, 90 Stat. 1520, 1648. Several opinion

James A. Rochelle, Petitioner 116 T.C. No. 26 · 2001

We would not be faithful to the statutory scheme, as revealed by the words employed, if we gave “paid or accrued” a different meaning for the purposes of section 122(d)(6) [I.R.C.

Rochelle v. Commissioner 116 T.C. 356 · 2001

We would not be faithful to the statutory scheme, as revealed by the words employed, if we gave “paid or accrued” a different meaning for the purposes of section 122(d)(6) [I.R.C.

Benjamin B. & Dorina Micorescu, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1998-398 · 1998

286, 343, current version at 42 U.S.C. secs. 1396-1396v (1994). It provides medical assistance for certain low-income people who meet specific eligibility criteria. Medicare is Federal health insurance for the aged and disabled under tit. XVIII of the SSA, secs. 1801-1815, 79 Stat. 291-297, current version at 42 U.S.C. secs. 1395

ny or affidavits alleging any intent by Bergman to mislead. 3 Generally, the loss of capacity by a principal has the same effect upon the authority of the agent during the period of incapacity as has the principal's death. 1 Restatement, Agency 2d, sec. 122 (1957). - 9 - See also Kuder v. United Natl. Bank, 497 A.2d 1105, 1108 (D.C. App. 1985); In re Berry's Estate, 329 N.Y.S.2d 915, 916 (N.Y. Sur. 1972); cf. In re Estate of Head, 94 N.M. 656, 615 P.2d 271, 274 (App. 1980) (trial court's finding

Robinson v. Commissioner 119 T.C. 44 · 2002
Redlark v. Commissioner 106 T.C. 31 · 1996
Reise v. Commissioner 35 T.C. 571 · 1961
Cluck v. Commissioner 29 T.C. 7 · 1957
Lagreide v. Commissioner 23 T.C. 508 · 1954
Flory Milling Co. v. Commissioner 21 T.C. 432 · 1953
Weill v. Commissioner 17 T.C. 318 · 1951
McDermott v. Commissioner 3 T.C. 929 · 1944
Rubin v. Commissioner 26 T.C. 1076 · 1956
Allen v. Commissioner 22 T.C. 70 · 1954
McNutt-Boyce Co. v. Commissioner 38 T.C. 462 · 1962
Budd Co. v. Commissioner 33 T.C. 813 · 1960
H. J. Heinz Co. v. Commissioner 32 T.C. 22 · 1959
F. L. Jacobs Co. v. Commissioner 30 T.C. 1194 · 1958
Maxcy v. Commissioner 26 T.C. 526 · 1956
Towers v. Commissioner 24 T.C. 199 · 1955
Robert Reis & Co. v. Commissioner 20 T.C. 294 · 1953
Lewyt Corp. v. Commissioner 18 T.C. 1245 · 1952
Baruch v. Commissioner 11 T.C. 96 · 1948
Sic v. Commissioner 10 T.C. 1096 · 1948
Estate of Owen v. Commissioner 104 T.C. 498 · 1995
Plumb v. Commissioner 97 T.C. 632 · 1991
Wise v. Commissioner 78 T.C. 270 · 1982
Zuanich v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 428 · 1981
Erfurth v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 570 · 1981
Kowalski v. Commissioner 65 T.C. 44 · 1975
Kewanee Oil Co. v. Commissioner 62 T.C. 728 · 1974
Gleason Works v. Commissioner 58 T.C. 464 · 1972
Shepard v. Commissioner 57 T.C. 600 · 1972
H. F. Ramsey Co. v. Commissioner 43 T.C. 500 · 1965
Tanner v. Commissioner 45 T.C. 145 · 1965
Bolnick v. Commissioner 44 T.C. 245 · 1965
Hambuechen v. Commissioner 43 T.C. 90 · 1964
Humacid Co. v. Commissioner 42 T.C. 894 · 1964
State Farming Co. v. Commissioner 40 T.C. 774 · 1963
Huyler's v. Commissioner 38 T.C. 773 · 1962
Wood v. Commissioner 37 T.C. 70 · 1961
Butler v. Commissioner 36 T.C. 1097 · 1961
J. G. Dudley Co. v. Commissioner 36 T.C. 1122 · 1961
Little v. Commissioner 34 T.C. 156 · 1960
Kent v. Commissioner 35 T.C. 30 · 1960
Kolker Bros. v. Commissioner 35 T.C. 299 · 1960
Nieman v. Commissioner 33 T.C. 411 · 1959
Swisher v. Commissioner 33 T.C. 506 · 1959
Batzell v. Commissioner 30 T.C. 648 · 1958
Elek v. Commissioner 30 T.C. 731 · 1958
Kaecker v. Commissioner 30 T.C. 897 · 1958
Prater v. Commissioner 30 T.C. 1262 · 1958
Ford v. Commissioner 31 T.C. 119 · 1958
Polk v. Commissioner 31 T.C. 412 · 1958
Weinstein v. Commissioner 29 T.C. 142 · 1957
Corey v. Commissioner 29 T.C. 360 · 1957
Townend v. Commissioner 27 T.C. 99 · 1956
Rothbart v. Commissioner 26 T.C. 680 · 1956
Vischia v. Commissioner 26 T.C. 1027 · 1956
H. Fendrich, Inc. v. Commissioner 25 T.C. 262 · 1955
Schwarcz v. Commissioner 24 T.C. 733 · 1955
Goble v. Commissioner 23 T.C. 593 · 1954
Aaron v. Commissioner 22 T.C. 1370 · 1954
Burns v. Commissioner 21 T.C. 857 · 1954
Kittle v. Commissioner 21 T.C. 79 · 1953
Cunningham v. Commissioner 20 T.C. 65 · 1953
Louis M. v. Commissioner 17 T.C. 1450 · 1952
Guggenheimer v. Commissioner 18 T.C. 81 · 1952
Luton v. Commissioner 18 T.C. 1153 · 1952
Redpath v. Commissioner 19 T.C. 470 · 1952
Smith v. Commissioner 17 T.C. 135 · 1951
Estate of Byrne v. Commissioner 16 T.C. 1234 · 1951
Sage v. Commissioner 15 T.C. 299 · 1950
Bond v. Commissioner 14 T.C. 478 · 1950
Foundation Co. v. Commissioner 14 T.C. 1333 · 1950
Winter & Co. v. Commissioner 13 T.C. 108 · 1949
Merrill v. Commissioner 9 T.C. 291 · 1947
Winship v. Commissioner 8 T.C. 744 · 1947
Morley v. Commissioner 8 T.C. 904 · 1947
Moore, Inc. v. Commissioner 4 T.C. 404 · 1944
Spookyworld, Inc. v. Town of Berlin 346 F.3d 1 · Cir.
Family Winemakers of California v. Jenkins 592 F.3d 1 · Cir.
Citizens Coal v. EPA · Cir.
United States v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. 432 F.3d 161 · Cir.
Citizens Coal Council and Kentucky Resources Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency 447 F.3d 879 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.