§1291 — Interest on tax deferral

534 citing cases

(a)Treatment of distributions and stock dispositions
(1)Distributions

If a United States person receives an excess distribution in respect of stock in a passive foreign investment company, then—

(A)

the amount of the excess distribution shall be allocated ratably to each day in the taxpayer’s holding period for the stock,

(B)

with respect to such excess distribution, the taxpayer’s gross income for the current year shall include (as ordinary income) only the amounts allocated under subparagraph (A) to—

(i)

the current year, or

(ii)

any period in the taxpayer’s holding period before the 1st day of the 1st taxable year of the company which begins after

December 31, 1986

, and for which it was a passive foreign investment company, and

(C)

the tax imposed by this chapter for the current year shall be increased by the deferred tax amount (determined under subsection (c)).

(2)Dispositions

If the taxpayer disposes of stock in a passive foreign investment company, then the rules of paragraph (1) shall apply to any gain recognized on such disposition in the same manner as if such gain were an excess distribution.

(3)Definitions

For purposes of this section—

(A)Holding period

The taxpayer’s holding period shall be determined under section 1223; except that—

(i)

for purposes of applying this section to an excess distribution, such holding period shall be treated as ending on the date of such distribution, and

(ii)

if section 1296 applied to such stock with respect to the taxpayer for any prior taxable year, such holding period shall be treated as beginning on the first day of the first taxable year beginning after the last taxable year for which section 1296 so applied.

(B)Current year

The term “current year” means the taxable year in which the excess distribution or disposition occurs.

(b)Excess distribution
(1)In general

For purposes of this section, the term “excess distribution” means any distribution in respect of stock received during any taxable year to the extent such distribution does not exceed its ratable portion of the total excess distribution (if any) for such taxable year.

(2)Total excess distribution

For purposes of this subsection—

(A)In general

The term “total excess distribution” means the excess (if any) of—

(i)

the amount of the distributions in respect of the stock received by the taxpayer during the taxable year, over

(ii)

125 percent of the average amount received in respect of such stock by the taxpayer during the 3 preceding taxable years (or, if shorter, the portion of the taxpayer’s holding period before the taxable year).

For purposes of clause (ii), any excess distribution received during such 3-year period shall be taken into account only to the extent it was included in gross income under subsection (a)(1)(B).

(B)No excess for 1st year

The total excess distributions with respect to any stock shall be zero for the taxable year in which the taxpayer’s holding period in such stock begins.

(3)Adjustments

Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary—

(A)

determinations under this subsection shall be made on a share-by-share basis, except that shares with the same holding period may be aggregated,

(B)

proper adjustments shall be made for stock splits and stock dividends,

(C)

if the taxpayer does not hold the stock during the entire taxable year, distributions received during such year shall be annualized,

(D)

if the taxpayer’s holding period includes periods during which the stock was held by another person, distributions received by such other person shall be taken into account as if received by the taxpayer,

(E)

if the distributions are received in a foreign currency, determinations under this subsection shall be made in such currency and the amount of any excess distribution determined in such currency shall be translated into dollars,

(F)

proper adjustment shall be made for amounts not includible in gross income by reason of section 959(a) or 1293(c), and

(G)

if a charitable deduction was allowable under section 642(c) to a trust for any distribution of its income, proper adjustments shall be made for the deduction so allowable to the extent allocable to distributions or gain in respect of stock in a passive foreign investment company.

(c)Deferred tax amount

For purposes of this section—

(1)In general

The term “deferred tax amount” means, with respect to any distribution or disposition to which subsection (a) applies, an amount equal to the sum of—

(A)

the aggregate increases in taxes described in paragraph (2), plus

(B)

the aggregate amount of interest (determined in the manner provided under paragraph (3)) on such increases in tax.

Any increase in the tax imposed by this chapter for the current year under subsection (a) to the extent attributable to the amount referred to in subparagraph (B) shall be treated as interest paid under section 6601 on the due date for the current year.

(2)Aggregate increases in taxes

For purposes of paragraph (1)(A), the aggregate increases in taxes shall be determined by multiplying each amount allocated under subsection (a)(1)(A) to any taxable year (other than any taxable year referred to in subsection (a)(1)(B)) by the highest rate of tax in effect for such taxable year under section 1 or 11, whichever applies.

(3)Computation of interest
(A)In general

The amount of interest referred to in paragraph (1)(B) on any increase determined under paragraph (2) for any taxable year shall be determined for the period—

(i)

beginning on the due date for such taxable year, and

(ii)

ending on the due date for the taxable year with or within which the distribution or disposition occurs,

by using the rates and method applicable under section 6621 for underpayments of tax for such period.

(B)Due date

For purposes of this subsection, the term “due date” means the date prescribed by law (determined without regard to extensions) for filing the return of the tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable year.

(d)Coordination with subparts B and C
(1)In general

This section shall not apply with respect to any distribution paid by a passive foreign investment company, or any disposition of stock in a passive foreign investment company, if such company is a qualified electing fund with respect to the taxpayer for each of its taxable years—

(A)

which begins after

December 31, 1986

, and for which such company is a passive foreign investment company, and

(B)

which includes any portion of the taxpayer’s holding period.

Except as provided in section 1296(j), this section also shall not apply if an election under section 1296(k) is in effect for the taxpayer’s taxable year. In the case of stock which is marked to market under section 475 or any other provision of this chapter, this section shall not apply, except that rules similar to the rules of section 1296(j) shall apply.

(2)Election to recognize gain where company becomes qualified electing fund
(A)In general

If—

(i)

a passive foreign investment company becomes a qualified electing fund with respect to the taxpayer for a taxable year which begins after

December 31, 1986

,

(ii)

the taxpayer holds stock in such company on the first day of such taxable year, and

(iii)

the taxpayer establishes to the satisfaction of the Secretary the fair market value of such stock on such first day,

the taxpayer may elect to recognize gain as if he sold such stock on such first day for such fair market value.

(B)Additional election for shareholder of controlled foreign corporations
(i)In general

If—

(I)

a passive foreign investment company becomes a qualified electing fund with respect to the taxpayer for a taxable year which begins after

December 31, 1986

,

(II)

the taxpayer holds stock in such company on the first day of such taxable year, and

(III)

such company is a controlled foreign corporation (as defined in section 957(a)),

(ii)Post-1986 earnings and profits

For purposes of clause (i), the term “post-1986 earnings and profits” means earnings and profits which were accumulated in taxable years of such company beginning after December 31, 1986, and during the period or periods the stock was held by the taxpayer while the company was a passive foreign investment company.

(iii)Coordination with section 959(e)

For purposes of section 959(e), any amount included in gross income under this subparagraph shall be treated as included in gross income under section 1248(a).

the taxpayer may elect to include in gross income as a dividend received on such first day an amount equal to the portion of the post-1986 earnings and profits of such company attributable (under regulations prescribed by the Secretary) to the stock in such company held by the taxpayer on such first day. The amount treated as a dividend under the preceding sentence shall be treated as an excess distribution and shall be allocated under subsection (a)(1)(A) only to days during periods taken into account in determining the post-1986 earnings and profits so attributable.

(C)Adjustments

In the case of any stock to which subparagraph (A) or (B) applies—

(i)

the adjusted basis of such stock shall be increased by the gain recognized under subparagraph (A) or the amount treated as a dividend under subparagraph (B), as the case may be, and

(ii)

the taxpayer’s holding period in such stock shall be treated as beginning on the first day referred to in such subparagraph.

(e)Certain basis, etc., rules made applicable

Except to the extent inconsistent with the regulations prescribed under subsection (f), rules similar to the rules of subsections (c), (d), and (e) of section 1246 (as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004) shall apply for purposes of this section; except that—

(1)

the reduction under subsection (e) of such section shall be the excess of the basis determined under section 1014 over the adjusted basis of the stock immediately before the decedent’s death, and

(2)

such a reduction shall not apply in the case of a decedent who was a nonresident alien at all times during his holding period in the stock.

(f)Recognition of gain

To the extent provided in regulations, in the case of any transfer of stock in a passive foreign investment company where (but for this subsection) there is not full recognition of gain, the excess (if any) of—

(1)

the fair market value of such stock, over

(2)

its adjusted basis,

shall be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of such stock and shall be recognized notwithstanding any provision of law. Proper adjustment shall be made to the basis of any such stock for gain recognized under the preceding sentence.

(g)Coordination with foreign tax credit rules
(1)In general

If there are creditable foreign taxes with respect to any distribution in respect of stock in a passive foreign investment company—

(A)

the amount of such distribution shall be determined for purposes of this section with regard to section 78,

(B)

the excess distribution taxes shall be allocated ratably to each day in the taxpayer’s holding period for the stock, and

(C)

to the extent—

(i)

that such excess distribution taxes are allocated to a taxable year referred to in subsection (a)(1)(B), such taxes shall be taken into account under section 901 for the current year, and

(ii)

that such excess distribution taxes are allocated to any other taxable year, such taxes shall reduce (subject to the principles of section 904(d) and not below zero) the increase in tax determined under subsection (c)(2) for such taxable year by reason of such distribution (but such taxes shall not be taken into account under section 901).

(2)Definitions

For purposes of this subsection—

(A)Creditable foreign taxes

The term “creditable foreign taxes” means, with respect to any distribution, any withholding tax imposed with respect to such distribution, but only if the taxpayer chooses the benefits of section 901 and such taxes are creditable under section 901 (determined without regard to paragraph (1)(C)(ii)).

(B)Excess distribution taxes

The term “excess distribution taxes” means, with respect to any distribution, the portion of the creditable foreign taxes with respect to such distribution which is attributable (on a pro rata basis) to the portion of such distribution which is an excess distribution.

(C)Section 1248 gain

The rules of this subsection also shall apply in the case of any gain which but for this section would be includible in gross income as a dividend under section 1248.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-0Treatment of shareholders of certain passive foreign investment companies; table of contents Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    This section contains a listing of the headings for §§ 1.1291-1, 1.1291-9, and 1.1291-10.

    (a) through (b)(2)(i) [Reserved]

    (ii) Pedigreed QEF.

    (b)(2)(iii) and (iv) [Reserved]

    (v) Section 1291 fund.

    (3) through (6) [Reserved]

    (7) Shareholder.

    (8) Indirect shareholder.

    (i) In general.

    (ii) Ownership through a corporation.

    (A) Ownership through a non-PFIC foreign corporation.

    (B) Ownership through a PFIC.

    (C) Ownership through a domestic corporation.

    (iii) Ownership through pass-through entities.

    (A) Partnerships.

    (B) S Corporations.

    (C) Estates and nongrantor trusts.

    (D) Grantor trusts.

    (iv) Successive application.

    (v) Examples.

    (A) Example 1.

    (1) Facts.

    (2) Results.

    (i) Treatment of DC.

    (ii) Treatment of A.

    (B) Example 2.

    (1) Facts.

    (2) Results.

    (C) Example 3.

    (1) Facts.

    (2) Results.

    (D) Example 4.

    (1) Facts.

    (2) Results.

    (c) Coordination with other PFIC rules.

    (1) and (2) [Reserved]

    (3) Coordination with section 1296: Distributions and dispositions.

    (4) Coordination with mark to market rules under chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code other than section 1296.

    (i) In general.

    (ii) Coordination rule.

    (d) [Reserved]

    (e) Exempt organization as shareholder.

    (1) In general.

    (2) Ownership through certain tax-exempt organizations and accounts.

    (f) through (i) [Reserved]

    (j) Applicability dates.

    (a) Deemed dividend election.

    (1) In general.

    (2) Post-1986 earnings and profits defined.

    (i) In general.

    (ii) Pro rata share of post-1986 earnings and profits attributable to shareholder's stock.

    (A) In general.

    (B) Reduction for previously taxed amounts.

    (b) Who may make the election.

    (c) Time for making the election.

    (d) Manner of making the election.

    (1) In general.

    (2) Attachment to Form 8621.

    (e) Qualification date.

    (1) In general.

    (2) Elections made after March 31, 1995, and before January 27, 1997.

    (i) In general.

    (ii) Exception.

    (3) Examples.

    (f) Adjustment to basis.

    (g) Treatment of holding period.

    (h) Coordination with section 959(e).

    (i) Election inapplicable to shareholder of former PFIC.

    (1) [Reserved]

    (2) Former PFIC.

    (j) Definitions.

    (1) Passive foreign investment company (PFIC).

    (2) Types of PFICs.

    (i) Qualified electing fund (QEF).

    (ii) Pedigreed QEF.

    (iii) Unpedigreed QEF.

    (iv) Former PFIC.

    (3) Shareholder.

    (k) Effective/applicability dates.

    (a) Deemed sale election.

    (b) Who may make the election.

    (c) Time for making the election.

    (d) Manner of making the election.

    (e) Qualification date.

    (1) In general.

    (2) Elections made after March 31, 1995, and before January 27, 1997.

    (i) In general.

    (ii) Exception.

    (f) Adjustments to basis.

    (1) In general.

    (2) Adjustment to basis for section 1293 inclusion with respect to deemed sale election made after March 31, 1995, and before January 27, 1997.

    (g) Treatment of holding period.

    (h) Election inapplicable to shareholder of former PFIC.

    (i) Effective date.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-0(a)Deemed sale election. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Deemed sale election.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-0(b)Who may make the election. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Who may make the election.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-0(c)Time for making the election. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Time for making the election.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-0(d)Manner of making the election. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Manner of making the election.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-0(e)Qualification date. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Qualification date.

    (1) In general.

    (2) Elections made after March 31, 1995, and before January 27, 1997.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-0(f)Adjustments to basis. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Adjustments to basis.

    (1) In general.

    (2) Adjustment to basis for section 1293 inclusion with respect to deemed sale election made after March 31, 1995, and before January 27, 1997.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-0(g)Treatment of holding period. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Treatment of holding period.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-0(h)Election inapplicable to shareholder of former PFIC. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Election inapplicable to shareholder of former PFIC.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-0(i)Effective date. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Effective date.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-0(j)Definitions. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Definitions.

    (1) Passive foreign investment company (PFIC).

    (2) Types of PFICs.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-0(k)Effective/applicability dates. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Effective/applicability dates.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-0(v)Examples. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Examples.

    (A) Example 1.

    (1) Facts.

    (2) Results.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-1Taxation of U.S. persons that are shareholders of section 1291 funds Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) through (b)(2)(i) [Reserved]

    (ii) Pedigreed QEF. A PFIC is a pedigreed QEF with respect to a shareholder if the PFIC has been a QEF with respect to the shareholder for all taxable years during which the corporation was a PFIC that are included wholly or partly in the shareholder's holding period of the PFIC stock.

    (b)(2)(iii) and (iv) [Reserved]

    (v) Section 1291 fund. A PFIC is a section 1291 fund with respect to a shareholder unless the PFIC is a pedigreed QEF with respect to the shareholder or a section 1296 election is in effect with respect to the shareholder.

    (3) through (6) [Reserved]

    (7) Shareholder. A shareholder is a United States person that directly owns stock of a PFIC (a direct shareholder), or that is an indirect shareholder (as defined in section 1298(a) and paragraph (b)(8) of this section), except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section. For purposes of sections 1291 and 1298, a domestic partnership or S corporation (as defined in section 1361(a)(1)) is not treated as a shareholder of a PFIC except for purposes of any information reporting requirements, including the requirement to file an annual report under section 1298(f). In addition, to the extent that a person is treated under sections 671 through 678 as the owner of a portion of a domestic trust, the trust is not treated as a shareholder of a PFIC with respect to PFIC stock held by that portion of the trust, except for purposes of the information reporting requirements of § 1.1298-1(b)(3)(i) (imposing an information reporting requirement on domestic liquidating trusts and fixed investment trusts).

    (8) Indirect shareholder—(i) In general. An indirect shareholder of a PFIC is a United States person that indirectly owns stock of a PFIC. A person indirectly owns stock when it is treated as owning stock of a corporation owned by another person, including another United States person, under this paragraph (b)(8). In applying this paragraph (b)(8), the determination of a person's indirect ownership is made on the basis of all the facts and circumstances in each case; the substance rather than the form of ownership is controlling, taking into account the purposes of sections 1291 through 1298.

    (ii) Ownership through a corporation—(A) Ownership through a non-PFIC foreign corporation. A person that directly or indirectly owns 50 percent or more in value of the stock of a foreign corporation that is not a PFIC is considered to own a proportionate amount (by value) of any stock owned directly or indirectly by the foreign corporation.

    (B) Ownership through a PFIC. A person that directly or indirectly owns stock of a PFIC is considered to own a proportionate amount (by value) of any stock owned directly or indirectly by the PFIC. Section 1297(d) does not apply in determining whether a corporation is a PFIC for purposes of this paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(B).

    (C) Ownership through a domestic corporation—(1) In general. Solely for purposes of determining whether a person satisfies the ownership threshold described in paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(A) of this section, a person that directly or indirectly owns 50 percent or more in value of the stock of a domestic corporation is considered to own a proportionate amount (by value) of any stock owned directly or indirectly by the domestic corporation.

    (2) Non-duplication. Paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(C)(1) of this section does not apply to treat a United States person as owning (other than for purposes of applying the ownership threshold in paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(A) of this section) stock of a PFIC that is directly owned or considered owned indirectly within the meaning of this paragraph (b)(8) by another United States person (determined without regard to paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(C)(1)). See Example 1 of paragraph (b)(8)(iv) of this section.

    (3) S corporations. The 50 percent limitation in paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(C)(1) of this section does not apply with respect to stock owned directly or indirectly by an S corporation. See paragraph (b)(8)(iii)(B) of this section for rules regarding stock owned directly or indirectly by an S corporation.

    (iii) Ownership through pass-through entities—(A) Partnerships. If a foreign or domestic partnership directly or indirectly owns stock, the partners of the partnership are considered to own such stock proportionately in accordance with their ownership interests in the partnership.

    (B) S Corporations. If an S corporation directly or indirectly owns stock, each S corporation shareholder is considered to own such stock proportionately in accordance with the shareholder's ownership interest in the S corporation.

    (C) Estates and nongrantor trusts. If a foreign or domestic estate or nongrantor trust (other than an employees' trust described in section 401(a) that is exempt from tax under section 501(a)) directly or indirectly owns stock, each beneficiary of the estate or trust is considered to own a proportionate amount of such stock. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(8)(iii)(C), a nongrantor trust is any trust or portion of a trust that is not treated as owned by one or more persons under sections 671 through 679.

    (D) Grantor trusts. If a foreign or domestic trust directly or indirectly owns stock, a person that is treated under sections 671 through 679 as the owner of any portion of the trust that holds an interest in the stock is considered to own the interest in the stock held by that portion of the trust.

    (iv) Successive application. Stock considered to be owned by a person by reason of paragraphs (b)(8)(ii) or (iii) of this section is, for purposes of applying such paragraphs, considered to be actually owned by such person. Subject to the limitations provided in section 1298(a) and paragraphs (b)(8)(ii) and (b)(8)(iii) of this section, this paragraph applies by successively considering a person as actually owning its proportionate share of stock or other equity interest directly held by an entity directly owned by the person. Paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(C)(2) of this section applies after the other subparagraphs of paragraph (b)(8) of this section.

    (v) Examples. The rules of this paragraph (b)(8) are illustrated by the following examples:

    (A) Example 1—(1) Facts. A is a United States person who owns 49% of the stock of FC1, a foreign corporation that is not a PFIC, and separately all of the stock of DC, a domestic corporation that is not an S corporation. DC, in turn, owns the remaining 51% of the stock of FC1, and FC1 owns 100 shares of stock in a PFIC that is not a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) within the meaning of section 957(a). The remainder of the PFIC's shares are owned by unrelated foreign persons.

    (2) Results—(i) Treatment of DC. Under paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(A) of this section, DC is considered to actually own 51 shares of the PFIC stock directly held by FC1 because DC directly owns 50% or more of the stock of FC1.

    (ii) Treatment of A. In determining whether A is considered to own 50% or more of the value of FC1 for purposes of applying paragraphs (b)(8)(ii)(A) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section to the PFIC stock held through FC1, A is considered under paragraphs (b)(8)(ii)(C)(1) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section as indirectly owning all the stock of FC1 that DC directly owns, before the application of paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(C)(2) of this section. Because A also directly owns 49% of the stock of FC1, before the application of paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(C)(2) of this section A would be treated as owning all 100 shares of PFIC stock held by FC1. However, because 51 shares of the PFIC stock held by FC1 are indirectly owned by DC under paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(A) of this section, pursuant to the limitation imposed by paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(C)(2) of this section, only the remaining 49 shares of the PFIC stock are considered as indirectly owned by A under paragraph (b)(8) of this section.

    (B) Example 2—(1) Facts. B, a United States citizen, owns 50% of the interests in Foreign Partnership, a foreign partnership treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the remaining interests in which are owned by an unrelated foreign person. Foreign Partnership owns 100% of the stock of FC1 and 50% of the stock of FC2, the remainder of which is owned by an unrelated foreign person. Both FC1 and FC2 are foreign corporations that are not PFICs. FC1 and FC2 each own 50% of the stock of FC3, a foreign corporation that is a PFIC.

    (2) Results. Under paragraphs (b)(8)(iii)(A) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section, for purposes of determining whether B is a shareholder of FC3, B is considered to actually own 50% (50% × 100%) of the stock of FC1 and 25% (50% × 50%) of the stock of FC2. Under paragraphs (b)(8)(ii)(A) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section, B is then considered to own 25% (50% × 100% × 50%) of the stock of FC3 indirectly through FC1, and thus is a shareholder of FC3 for purposes of the PFIC provisions. Because B is considered to own less than 50% of FC2, B is not considered to own any stock of FC3 indirectly through FC2.

    (C) Example 3—(1) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (b)(8)(v)(B)(1) of this section (the facts in Example 2), except that B owns 40% of the interests in Foreign Partnership.

    (2) Results. Under paragraph (b)(8)(iii)(A) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section, for purposes of determining whether B is a shareholder of FC3, B is considered to actually own 40% (40% × 100%) of the stock of FC1 and 20% (40% × 50%) of the stock of FC2, and thus is not considered to own 50% or more of the stock of FC1 or FC2. Under paragraphs (b)(8)(ii)(A) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section, B is not considered to own any stock of FC3 indirectly through FC1 or FC2.

    (D) Example 4—(1) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (b)(8)(v)(C)(1) of this section (the facts in Example 3), except that FP owns only 80% of FC1 and B also directly owns 20% of FC1.

    (2) Results. Under paragraph (b)(8)(iii)(A) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section, for purposes of determining whether B is a shareholder of FC3, B is considered to own 32% (40% × 80%) of the stock of FC1 and 20% (40% × 50%) of the stock of FC2. Because B directly owns 20% of FC1, B is considered to actually own 52% (32% + 20%) of the stock of FC1 in total. Under paragraphs (b)(8)(ii)(A) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section, B is considered to own 26% (52% × 50%) of the stock of FC3 indirectly through FC1, and thus is a shareholder of FC3 for purposes of the PFIC provisions. B is not considered to own any stock of FC3 indirectly through FC2.

    (c) Coordination with other PFIC rules.

    (1)-(2) [Reserved]

    (3) Coordination with section 1296: distributions and dispositions. If PFIC stock is marked to market under section 1296 for any taxable year, then, except as provided in § 1.1296-1(i), section 1291 and the regulations thereunder shall not apply to any distribution with respect to section 1296 stock (as defined in § 1.1296-1(a)(2)), or to any disposition of such stock, for such taxable year.

    (4) Coordination with mark to market rules under chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code other than section 1296—(i) In general. If PFIC stock is marked to market for any taxable year under section 475 or any other provision of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, other than section 1296, regardless of whether the application of such provision is mandatory or results from an election by the taxpayer or another person, then, except as provided in paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of this section, section 1291 and the regulations thereunder shall not apply to any distribution with respect to such PFIC stock or to any disposition of such PFIC stock for such taxable year. See §§ 1.1295-1(i)(3) and 1.1296-1(h)(3)(i) for rules regarding the automatic termination of an existing election under section 1295 or section 1296 when a taxpayer marks to market PFIC stock under section 475 or any other provision of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code.

    (ii) Coordination rule. (A) Notwithstanding any provision in this section to the contrary, the rule of paragraph (c)(4)(ii)(B) of this section shall apply to the first taxable year in which a United States person marks to market its PFIC stock under a provision of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, other than section 1296, if such foreign corporation was a PFIC for any taxable year, prior to such first taxable year, during the United States person's holding period (as defined in section 1291(a)(3)(A) and § 1.1296-1(f)) in such stock, and for which such corporation was not treated as a QEF with respect to such United States person.

    (B) For the first taxable year of a United States person that marks to market its PFIC stock under any provision of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, other than section 1296, such United States person shall, in lieu of the rules under which the United States person marks to market, apply the rules of § 1.1296-1(i)(2) and (3) as if the United States person had made an election under section 1296 for such first taxable year.

    (d) [Reserved]

    (e) Exempt organization as shareholder—(1) In general. If the shareholder of a PFIC is an organization exempt from tax under this chapter, section 1291 and these regulations apply to such shareholder only if a dividend from the PFIC would be taxable to the organization under subchapter F.

    (2) Ownership through certain tax-exempt organizations and accounts. To the extent a United States person owns stock of a PFIC through an organization or account described in § 1.1298-1(c)(1), that person is not treated as a shareholder with respect to the PFIC stock.

    (f)-(i) [Reserved]

    (j) Applicability dates. (1) Paragraphs (c)(3) and (4) of this section apply for taxable years beginning on or after May 3, 2004.

    (2) Paragraph (e)(1) of this section is applicable on and after April 1, 1992.

    (3) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (j)(4) of this section, paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) and (v), (b)(7) and (8), and (e)(2) of this section apply to taxable years of shareholders ending on or after December 31, 2013.

    (4) Paragraphs (b)(8)(iv) and (b)(8)(v)(A), (B), (C), and (D) of this section apply for taxable years of shareholders beginning on or after January 14, 2021. A shareholder may choose to apply such paragraphs for any open taxable year beginning before January 14, 2021, provided that, with respect to a tested foreign corporation, the shareholder consistently applies such paragraphs and the provisions of §§ 1.1297-1 (except that consistent treatment is not required with respect to § 1.1297-1(c)(1)(i)(A)), 1.1297-2, 1.1297-4, 1.1297-6, 1.1298-2, and 1.1298-4 for such year and all subsequent years.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-1(a)§1.1291-1(a) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    through (b)(2)(i) [Reserved]

    (ii) Pedigreed QEF. A PFIC is a pedigreed QEF with respect to a shareholder if the PFIC has been a QEF with respect to the shareholder for all taxable years during which the corporation was a PFIC that are included wholly or partly in the shareholder's holding period of the PFIC stock.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-1(b)§1.1291-1(b) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (2)(iii) and (iv) [Reserved]

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-1(c)Coordination with other PFIC rules. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Coordination with other PFIC rules.

    (1)-(2) [Reserved]

    (3) Coordination with section 1296: distributions and dispositions. If PFIC stock is marked to market under section 1296 for any taxable year, then, except as provided in § 1.1296-1(i), section 1291 and the regulations thereunder shall not apply to any distribution with respect to section 1296 stock (as defined in § 1.1296-1(a)(2)), or to any disposition of such stock, for such taxable year.

    (4) Coordination with mark to market rules under chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code other than section 1296—(i) In general. If PFIC stock is marked to market for any taxable year under section 475 or any other provision of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, other than section 1296, regardless of whether the application of such provision is mandatory or results from an election by the taxpayer or another person, then, except as provided in paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of this section, section 1291 and the regulations thereunder shall not apply to any distribution with respect to such PFIC stock or to any disposition of such PFIC stock for such taxable year. See §§ 1.1295-1(i)(3) and 1.1296-1(h)(3)(i) for rules regarding the automatic termination of an existing election under section 1295 or section 1296 when a taxpayer marks to market PFIC stock under section 475 or any other provision of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code.

    (ii) Coordination rule. (A) Notwithstanding any provision in this section to the contrary, the rule of paragraph (c)(4)(ii)(B) of this section shall apply to the first taxable year in which a United States person marks to market its PFIC stock under a provision of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, other than section 1296, if such foreign corporation was a PFIC for any taxable year, prior to such first taxable year, during the United States person's holding period (as defined in section 1291(a)(3)(A) and § 1.1296-1(f)) in such stock, and for which such corporation was not treated as a QEF with respect to such United States person.

    (B) For the first taxable year of a United States person that marks to market its PFIC stock under any provision of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, other than section 1296, such United States person shall, in lieu of the rules under which the United States person marks to market, apply the rules of § 1.1296-1(i)(2) and (3) as if the United States person had made an election under section 1296 for such first taxable year.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-1(d)§1.1291-1(d) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    [Reserved]

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-1(e)Exempt organization as shareholder—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Exempt organization as shareholder—(1) In general. If the shareholder of a PFIC is an organization exempt from tax under this chapter, section 1291 and these regulations apply to such shareholder only if a dividend from the PFIC would be taxable to the organization under subchapter F.

    (2) Ownership through certain tax-exempt organizations and accounts. To the extent a United States person owns stock of a PFIC through an organization or account described in § 1.1298-1(c)(1), that person is not treated as a shareholder with respect to the PFIC stock.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-1(f)§1.1291-1(f) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    -(i) [Reserved]

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-1(j)Applicability dates. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Applicability dates. (1) Paragraphs (c)(3) and (4) of this section apply for taxable years beginning on or after May 3, 2004.

    (2) Paragraph (e)(1) of this section is applicable on and after April 1, 1992.

    (3) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (j)(4) of this section, paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) and (v), (b)(7) and (8), and (e)(2) of this section apply to taxable years of shareholders ending on or after December 31, 2013.

    (4) Paragraphs (b)(8)(iv) and (b)(8)(v)(A), (B), (C), and (D) of this section apply for taxable years of shareholders beginning on or after January 14, 2021. A shareholder may choose to apply such paragraphs for any open taxable year beginning before January 14, 2021, provided that, with respect to a tested foreign corporation, the shareholder consistently applies such paragraphs and the provisions of §§ 1.1297-1 (except that consistent treatment is not required with respect to § 1.1297-1(c)(1)(i)(A)), 1.1297-2, 1.1297-4, 1.1297-6, 1.1298-2, and 1.1298-4 for such year and all subsequent years.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-1(v)Examples. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Examples. The rules of this paragraph (b)(8) are illustrated by the following examples:

    (A) Example 1—(1) Facts. A is a United States person who owns 49% of the stock of FC1, a foreign corporation that is not a PFIC, and separately all of the stock of DC, a domestic corporation that is not an S corporation. DC, in turn, owns the remaining 51% of the stock of FC1, and FC1 owns 100 shares of stock in a PFIC that is not a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) within the meaning of section 957(a). The remainder of the PFIC's shares are owned by unrelated foreign persons.

    (2) Results—(i) Treatment of DC. Under paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(A) of this section, DC is considered to actually own 51 shares of the PFIC stock directly held by FC1 because DC directly owns 50% or more of the stock of FC1.

    (ii) Treatment of A. In determining whether A is considered to own 50% or more of the value of FC1 for purposes of applying paragraphs (b)(8)(ii)(A) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section to the PFIC stock held through FC1, A is considered under paragraphs (b)(8)(ii)(C)(1) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section as indirectly owning all the stock of FC1 that DC directly owns, before the application of paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(C)(2) of this section. Because A also directly owns 49% of the stock of FC1, before the application of paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(C)(2) of this section A would be treated as owning all 100 shares of PFIC stock held by FC1. However, because 51 shares of the PFIC stock held by FC1 are indirectly owned by DC under paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(A) of this section, pursuant to the limitation imposed by paragraph (b)(8)(ii)(C)(2) of this section, only the remaining 49 shares of the PFIC stock are considered as indirectly owned by A under paragraph (b)(8) of this section.

    (B) Example 2—(1) Facts. B, a United States citizen, owns 50% of the interests in Foreign Partnership, a foreign partnership treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the remaining interests in which are owned by an unrelated foreign person. Foreign Partnership owns 100% of the stock of FC1 and 50% of the stock of FC2, the remainder of which is owned by an unrelated foreign person. Both FC1 and FC2 are foreign corporations that are not PFICs. FC1 and FC2 each own 50% of the stock of FC3, a foreign corporation that is a PFIC.

    (2) Results. Under paragraphs (b)(8)(iii)(A) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section, for purposes of determining whether B is a shareholder of FC3, B is considered to actually own 50% (50% × 100%) of the stock of FC1 and 25% (50% × 50%) of the stock of FC2. Under paragraphs (b)(8)(ii)(A) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section, B is then considered to own 25% (50% × 100% × 50%) of the stock of FC3 indirectly through FC1, and thus is a shareholder of FC3 for purposes of the PFIC provisions. Because B is considered to own less than 50% of FC2, B is not considered to own any stock of FC3 indirectly through FC2.

    (C) Example 3—(1) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (b)(8)(v)(B)(1) of this section (the facts in Example 2), except that B owns 40% of the interests in Foreign Partnership.

    (2) Results. Under paragraph (b)(8)(iii)(A) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section, for purposes of determining whether B is a shareholder of FC3, B is considered to actually own 40% (40% × 100%) of the stock of FC1 and 20% (40% × 50%) of the stock of FC2, and thus is not considered to own 50% or more of the stock of FC1 or FC2. Under paragraphs (b)(8)(ii)(A) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section, B is not considered to own any stock of FC3 indirectly through FC1 or FC2.

    (D) Example 4—(1) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (b)(8)(v)(C)(1) of this section (the facts in Example 3), except that FP owns only 80% of FC1 and B also directly owns 20% of FC1.

    (2) Results. Under paragraph (b)(8)(iii)(A) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section, for purposes of determining whether B is a shareholder of FC3, B is considered to own 32% (40% × 80%) of the stock of FC1 and 20% (40% × 50%) of the stock of FC2. Because B directly owns 20% of FC1, B is considered to actually own 52% (32% + 20%) of the stock of FC1 in total. Under paragraphs (b)(8)(ii)(A) and (b)(8)(iv) of this section, B is considered to own 26% (52% × 50%) of the stock of FC3 indirectly through FC1, and thus is a shareholder of FC3 for purposes of the PFIC provisions. B is not considered to own any stock of FC3 indirectly through FC2.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-10Deemed sale election Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) Deemed sale election. This section provides rules for making the election under section 1291(d)(2)(A) (deemed sale election). Under that section, a shareholder (as defined in § 1.1291-9(j)(3)) of a PFIC that is an unpedigreed QEF may elect to recognize gain with respect to the stock of the unpedigreed QEF held on the qualification date (as defined in paragraph (e) of this section). If the shareholder makes the deemed sale election, the PFIC will become a pedigreed QEF with respect to the shareholder. A shareholder that makes the deemed sale election is treated as having sold, for its fair market value, the stock of the PFIC that the shareholder held on the qualification date. The gain recognized on the deemed sale is taxed under section 1291 as an excess distribution received on the qualification date. In the case of an election made by an indirect shareholder, the amount of gain to be recognized and taxed as an excess distribution is the amount of gain that the direct owner of the stock of the PFIC would have realized on an actual sale or other disposition of the stock of the PFIC indirectly owned by the shareholder. Any loss realized on the deemed sale is not recognized. For the definitions of PFIC, QEF, unpedigreed QEF, and pedigreed QEF, see § 1.1291-9(j) (1) and (2).

    (b) Who may make the election. A shareholder of an unpedigreed QEF may make the deemed sale election provided the shareholder held stock of that PFIC on the qualification date. A shareholder is treated as holding stock of the PFIC on the qualification date if its holding period with respect to that stock under section 1223 includes the qualification date. A deemed sale election may be made by a shareholder that would realize a loss on the deemed sale.

    (c) Time for making the election. The shareholder makes the deemed sale election in the shareholder's return for the taxable year that includes the qualification date. If the shareholder and the PFIC have the same taxable year, the shareholder makes the deemed sale election in either the original return for the taxable year for which the shareholder makes the section 1295 election, or in an amended return for that year. If the shareholder and the PFIC have different taxable years, the deemed sale election must be made in an amended return for the taxable year that includes the qualification date. If the deemed sale election is made in an amended return, the amended return must be filed by a date that is within three years of the due date, as extended under section 6081, of the original return for the taxable year that includes the qualification date.

    (d) Manner of making the election. A shareholder makes the deemed sale election by filing Form 8621 with the return for the taxable year of the shareholder that includes the qualification date, reporting the gain as an excess distribution pursuant to section 1291(a), and paying the tax and interest due on the excess distribution. A shareholder that makes the deemed sale election after the due date of the return (determined without regard to extensions) for the taxable year that includes the qualification date must pay additional interest, pursuant to section 6601, on the amount of the underpayment of tax for that year. A shareholder that realizes a loss on the deemed sale reports the loss on Form 8621, but does not recognize the loss.

    (e) Qualification date—(1) In general. Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (e), the qualification date is the first day of the PFIC's first taxable year as a QEF (first QEF year).

    (2) Elections made after March 31, 1995, and before January 27, 1997—(i) In general. The qualification date for deemed sale elections made after March 31, 1995, and before January 27, 1997, is the first day of the shareholder's election year. The shareholder's election year is the taxable year of the shareholder for which it made the section 1295 election.

    (ii) Exception. A shareholder who made the deemed sale election after May 1, 1992, and before January 27, 1997, may elect to change its qualification date to the first day of the first QEF year, provided the periods of limitations on assessment for the taxable year that includes that date and for the shareholder's election year have not expired. A shareholder changes the qualification date by filing amended returns, with revised Forms 8621, for the shareholder's election year and the shareholder's taxable year that includes the first day of the first QEF year, and making all appropriate adjustments and payments.

    (f) Adjustments to basis—(1) In general. A shareholder that makes the deemed sale election increases its adjusted basis of the PFIC stock owned directly by the amount of gain recognized on the deemed sale. If the shareholder makes the deemed sale election with respect to a PFIC of which it is an indirect shareholder, the shareholder's adjusted basis of the stock or other property owned directly by the shareholder, through which ownership of the PFIC is attributed to the shareholder, is increased by the amount of gain recognized by the shareholder. In addition, solely for purposes of determining the subsequent treatment under the Code and regulations of a shareholder of the stock of the PFIC, the adjusted basis of the direct owner of the stock of the PFIC is increased by the amount of gain recognized on the deemed sale. A shareholder shall not adjust the basis of any stock with respect to which the shareholder realized a loss on the deemed sale.

    (2) Adjustment of basis for section 1293 inclusion with respect to deemed sale election made after March 31, 1995, and before January 27, 1997. For purposes of determining the amount of gain recognized with respect to a deemed sale election made after March 31, 1995, and before January 27, 1997, by a shareholder that treats the first day of the shareholder's election year as the qualification date, the adjusted basis of the stock deemed sold includes the shareholder's section 1293(a) inclusion attributable to the period beginning with the first day of the PFIC's first QEF year and ending on the day before the qualification date.

    (g) Treatment of holding period. For purposes of applying sections 1291 through 1297 to the shareholder after the deemed sale, the shareholder's holding period of the stock of the PFIC begins on the qualification date, without regard to whether the shareholder recognized gain on the deemed sale. For other purposes of the Code and regulations, this holding period rule does not apply.

    (h) Election inapplicable to shareholder of former PFIC. A shareholder may not make the section 1295 and deemed sale elections if the foreign corporation is a former PFIC (as defined in § 1.1291-9(j)(2)(iv)) with respect to the shareholder. For the rules regarding the election by a shareholder of a former PFIC, see § 1.1297-3T.

    (i) Effective date. The rules of this section are applicable as of April 1, 1995.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-10(a)Deemed sale election. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Deemed sale election. This section provides rules for making the election under section 1291(d)(2)(A) (deemed sale election). Under that section, a shareholder (as defined in § 1.1291-9(j)(3)) of a PFIC that is an unpedigreed QEF may elect to recognize gain with respect to the stock of the unpedigreed QEF held on the qualification date (as defined in paragraph (e) of this section). If the shareholder makes the deemed sale election, the PFIC will become a pedigreed QEF with respect to the shareholder. A shareholder that makes the deemed sale election is treated as having sold, for its fair market value, the stock of the PFIC that the shareholder held on the qualification date. The gain recognized on the deemed sale is taxed under section 1291 as an excess distribution received on the qualification date. In the case of an election made by an indirect shareholder, the amount of gain to be recognized and taxed as an excess distribution is the amount of gain that the direct owner of the stock of the PFIC would have realized on an actual sale or other disposition of the stock of the PFIC indirectly owned by the shareholder. Any loss realized on the deemed sale is not recognized. For the definitions of PFIC, QEF, unpedigreed QEF, and pedigreed QEF, see § 1.1291-9(j) (1) and (2).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1291-10(b)Who may make the election. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Who may make the election. A shareholder of an unpedigreed QEF may make the deemed sale election provided the shareholder held stock of that PFIC on the qualification date. A shareholder is treated as holding stock of the PFIC on the qualification date if its holding period with respect to that stock under section 1223 includes the qualification date. A deemed sale election may be made by a shareholder that would realize a loss on the deemed sale.

534 Citing Cases

Accordingly, there was no need for Congress to change section 78 to confirm that section 78 dividends qualified for the deduction.15 14 In section 245A(f), Congress took the same approach with respect to amounts under section 1291, excluding those amounts from the deduction by providing that they “shall not be treated as a dividend for purposes of this section.” 15 For this reason, we also reject the Commissioner’s argument that the lack of a specific rule allowing the deduction for section 78 d

nation is sustained. B. UBS Investment Income Through Mrs. Fairbank’s beneficial ownership of UBS account 0857, she earned income from the trading of PFIC assets. See I.R.C. §§ 1297, 1298(a)(3). Respondent determined PFIC income and tax according to section 1291. Petitioners do not dispute the amount of PFIC income earned in the account but rather ask this Court to disallow the PFIC-related adjustments on the grounds that Xavana Establishment is properly classified as a CFC, therefore not subjec

PFIC assets, and unidentified deposits in domestic accounts. The revenue agent categorized domestic deposits as gross receipts from Schedule C unless substantiated with a nontaxable source. The revenue agent calculated PFIC gain and tax according to section 1291. The revenue agent decided to assert penalties under sections 6662 and 6663. He prepared Forms 4549, Income Tax Examination Changes, commonly known as a revenue agent report (RAR), asserting those penalties. The revenue agent’s immediate

Appellate Rule 18 does not define “court of the United States.” However, Appellate Rule 18(c) provides that certification “may be invoked by any of the federal courts upon * * * motion.” (Emphasis added.) This text suggests that Ap- pellate Rule 18 would embrace a question certified by the Tax Court.

time barred under section 6501 and (2) to the extent assessment is not time barred, whether petitioners are entitled to offset gains from sales ofstocks in passive foreign investment companies (PFICs) with losses from sales ofPFIC stocks, so as to reduce the total amount ofgain taxed under section 1291. Background The parties submitted this case fully stipulated pursuant to Rule 122. Petitioners resided in Virginia when they timely petitioned the Court. ¹Unless otherwise indicated, all section r

We hold that the funds now represent a payment of the estate’s Federal estate tax and are taken into account in calculating the estate’s overpayment of that tax.

Estate of Rosen v. Commissioner 131 T.C. 75 · 2008

The estate included as part of decedent’s final income tax return a Form 8621, Return by a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign Investment Company or Qualifying Electing Fund, reporting that decedent owed section 1291 tax of $562,633 and section 1291 interest of $498,386.

3 Sec. 3103(b)(1) of the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-206, 112 Stat. 685, 731, amended sec. 7436(c)(1) to increase the limit from $10,000 to $50,000 per quarter, effective for proceedings commenced after July 22, 1998. - 6 - Next, we consider whether our interpretation of section 7436 is altered by (1) it

Kovens v. Commissioner 91 T.C. 74 · 1988
Estate of Gill v. Commissioner 35 T.C. 1208 · 1961
Paul Parker v. Bnsf Railway Company 112 F.4th 687 · Cir.
United States v. Patrick Sutherland · Cir.
Full Circle Villagebrook GP, LLC v. Protech 2004-D, LLC 119 F.4th 522 · Cir.
Al Otro Lado v. Alejandro Mayorkas 138 F.4th 1102 · Cir.
Republican Natl Cmte v. Wetzel 120 F.4th 200 · Cir.
TX Medical Association v. HHS · Cir.
Bb&t Corp. v. United States 523 F.3d 461 · Cir.
Grand Canyon University v. Miguel Cardona 121 F.4th 717 · Cir.
United States v. Ahmad Abouammo · Cir.
Just Puppies, Inc. v. Anthony Brown 123 F.4th 652 · Cir.
United States v. Hohn 123 F.4th 1084 · Cir.
United States v. Nahsiem McIntosh 124 F.4th 199 · Cir.
New Jersey Primary Care Ass'n v. New Jersey Department of Human Services 722 F.3d 527 · Cir.
Action Recycling Inc. v. United States 721 F.3d 1142 · Cir.
United States v. Jeremy Young 129 F.4th 459 · Cir.
Sun Capital Partners III, LP v. New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension Fund 724 F.3d 129 · Cir.
United States v. Sullivan 131 F.4th 776 · Cir.
United States v. Arthur Stover 131 F.4th 199 · Cir.
United States v. Ronald Byers 133 F.4th 824 · Cir.
United States v. Robert Stinson, Jr. 734 F.3d 180 · Cir.
Waugh Chapel South, LLC v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 27 728 F.3d 354 · Cir.
United States v. Gene Jirak 728 F.3d 806 · Cir.
United States v. Joseph Konrad · Cir.
United States v. Myers 136 F.4th 917 · Cir.
Al Otro Lado v. Kristi Noem · Cir.
United States v. Nicholas Lucidonio · Cir.
United States v. Coonan 143 F.4th 119 · Cir.
United States v. Eric Walton · Cir.
United States v. Morgan · Cir.
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Stolfi · Cir.
United States v. Charles Sorensen · Cir.
United States v. Morgan · Cir.
Bristol Myers Squibb Co v. Secretary United States Department of HHS · Cir.
Rio Grande Foundation v. Oliver · Cir.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp v. Secretary United States Department of Health · Cir.
United States v. Wells · Cir.
United States v. Tso · Cir.
Novo Nordisk Inc v. Secretary US Dept & Health and Human Services · Cir.
United States v. Elias · Cir.
United States v. Ernst Jacob GmbH & Co. KG · Cir.
Custodia Bank v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors · Cir.
United States v. Sullivan · Cir.
United States v. Christopher Arthur · Cir.
United States v. Kittson · Cir.
United States v. Avalos · Cir.
United States v. Nicole Schuster · Cir.
Kalbers v. Volkswagen Ag · Cir.
United States v. James Abrams · Cir.
Duke v. Luxottica U.S. Holdings Corp. · Cir.
DiCarlo v. St. Mary Hospital 530 F.3d 255 · Cir.
United States v. Vincent 519 F.3d 732 · Cir.
Alcoa, Inc. v. United States 509 F.3d 173 · Cir.
United States v. Levinson 543 F.3d 190 · Cir.
United States v. Tann 577 F.3d 533 · Cir.
United States v. Saybolt 577 F.3d 195 · Cir.
United States v. Rollins 552 F.3d 739 · Cir.
United States v. Laboy-Torres 553 F.3d 715 · Cir.
General Mills, Inc. v. United States 554 F.3d 727 · Cir.
United States v. Bevans 506 F.3d 1133 · Cir.
Urban Hotel Development Co. v. President Development Group, L.C. 535 F.3d 874 · Cir.
United States v. Aldridge 561 F.3d 759 · Cir.
Battoni v. IBEW Local Union No. 102 Employee Pension Plan 594 F.3d 230 · Cir.
United States v. Hardy 586 F.3d 1040 · Cir.
United States v. Hall 515 F.3d 186 · Cir.
Umland v. PLANCO Financial Services, Inc. 542 F.3d 59 · Cir.
United States v. Rose 538 F.3d 175 · Cir.
United States v. Carter 538 F.3d 784 · Cir.
Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n-International Longshoremen's Ass'n Pension Fund v. Commissioner 523 F.3d 140 · Cir.
Galloway v. United States 492 F.3d 219 · Cir.
Conopco, Inc. v. United States 572 F.3d 162 · Cir.
Skiba v. Laher 496 F.3d 279 · Cir.
Leckey v. Stefano 501 F.3d 212 · Cir.
United States v. Marzzarella 614 F.3d 85 · Cir.
Anuforo v. Commissioner 614 F.3d 799 · Cir.
United States v. Richard Stadtmauer 620 F.3d 238 · Cir.
United States v. Richard Stadtmauer · Cir.
United States v. Tamika Riley 621 F.3d 312 · Cir.
United States v. Worman 622 F.3d 969 · Cir.
Broughman v. Carver 624 F.3d 670 · Cir.
United States v. Kulick 629 F.3d 165 · Cir.
Linton v. United States 630 F.3d 1211 · Cir.
United States v. Bergbauer 602 F.3d 569 · Cir.
United States v. Martin 363 F.3d 25 · Cir.
Rhode Island v. United States Environmental Protection Agency 378 F.3d 19 · Cir.
United States v. Marek 548 F.3d 147 · Cir.
Remington v. United States 210 F.3d 281 · Cir.
United States v. McElroy 587 F.3d 73 · Cir.
Baccei v. United States 632 F.3d 1140 · Cir.
United States v. Negroni 638 F.3d 434 · Cir.
Henderson v. UPMC 640 F.3d 524 · Cir.
Merck & Co., Inc. v. United States 652 F.3d 475 · Cir.
New Jersey Physicians, Inc. v. President of the United States 653 F.3d 234 · Cir.
United States v. Dixon 648 F.3d 195 · Cir.
Renfro v. Unisys Corp. 671 F.3d 314 · Cir.
Mary Johnson v. United States 734 F.3d 352 · Cir.
United States v. Under Seal 737 F.3d 330 · Cir.
United States v. Ronald Ottaviano 738 F.3d 586 · Cir.
Delaware County v. Federal Housing Finance Agency 747 F.3d 215 · Cir.
Alfredo Semper v. Curtis Gomez 60 V.I. 971 · Cir.
United States v. Shellef and Rubenstein · Cir.
United States v. Shellef and Rubenstein 507 F.3d 82 · Cir.
Estate of John RH Thouron v. United States 752 F.3d 311 · Cir.
Robert Freedman v. Sumner Redstone 753 F.3d 416 · Cir.
ABC Beverage Corporation v. United States 756 F.3d 438 · Cir.
United States v. Aldo Martinez 756 F.3d 1092 · Cir.
United States v. Richard Mathews 761 F.3d 891 · Cir.
Salty Brine 1, Limited v. United States 761 F.3d 484 · Cir.
Nick Coons v. Jacob Lew · Cir.
Nick Coons v. Jacob Lew 762 F.3d 891 · Cir.
Deidre Clark v. United States 764 F.3d 653 · Cir.
Kobach v. United States Election Assistance Commission 772 F.3d 1183 · Cir.
United States v. Daryl Kollman 774 F.3d 592 · Cir.
Joe Kannikal v. Attorney General United States 776 F.3d 146 · Cir.
Geneva College v. Secretary United States DePartment of Health 778 F.3d 422 · Cir.
Ellis v. J.R.'s Country Stores, Inc. 779 F.3d 1184 · Cir.
United States v. Aaron Webster 788 F.3d 891 · Cir.
United States v. Ghassan Elashi 789 F.3d 547 · Cir.
United States v. Patricia Fountain 792 F.3d 310 · Cir.
Jeffrey Perelman v. Raymond Perelman 793 F.3d 368 · Cir.
United States v. Eli Chabot 793 F.3d 338 · Cir.
United States v. Randy Patrie 794 F.3d 998 · Cir.
United States v. Dennis Williams 796 F.3d 815 · Cir.
City of Oakland v. Loretta E. Lynch 798 F.3d 1159 · Cir.
United States v. Sorensen 801 F.3d 1217 · Cir.
Board of Trustees of the IBT Local 863 Pension Fund v. C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. 802 F.3d 534 · Cir.
United Dominion v. United States · Cir.
United States v. Bolden · Cir.
Scott v. United States 328 F.3d 132 · Cir.
United States v. Wardrick · Cir.
United States Department of Labor v. North Carolina Growers Ass'n, Inc. 377 F.3d 345 · Cir.
United States v. Bundy · Cir.
United States v. Rose · Cir.
United States v. B & D Vending Inc · Cir.
Gencorp Inc v. Olin Corp · Cir.
TransAmerica v. USA · Cir.
United States v. Dedman · Cir.
United States v. Donna Hardy · Cir.
Garratt, Reg G. v. Knowles, James E. 245 F.3d 941 · Cir.
United States v. Carter, Virginia · Cir.
Inductotherm Ind Inc v. United States · Cir.
In Re Pillowtex · Cir.
NY Giants Football v. Commissioner IRS · Cir.
Burstein v. Retirement Account Plan for Employees of Allegheny Health Education & Research Foundation 334 F.3d 365 · Cir.
United States v. Jenkins · Cir.
Lexington Natl Ins v. Ranger Ins Co · Cir.
Conoshenti v. Pub Ser Elec & Gas · Cir.
United States v. Grier · Cir.
United States v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. 432 F.3d 161 · Cir.
In Re Schering-Plough Corp. Erisa Litigation 420 F.3d 231 · Cir.
Popky v. United States · Cir.
United States v. Bell · Cir.
Romero v. Allstate Corp. 404 F.3d 212 · Cir.
Cetel v. Kirwan Financial Group, Inc. 460 F.3d 494 · Cir.
Knight v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n 457 F.3d 331 · Cir.
United States v. Hull · Cir.
Reese Bros Inc v. United States · Cir.
United States v. Daraio · Cir.
United States v. Willaman · Cir.
United States v. Hedgepeth · Cir.
United States v. Indalecio Arellano · Cir.
Bernard Cavegn v. Twin City Pipe · Cir.
Alcoa Inc v. United States · Cir.
United States v. Introcaso · Cir.
Doris A. L. Hansen v. United States · Cir.
Skiba v. Laher · Cir.
Galloway v. United States · Cir.
Jakimas v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. 485 F.3d 770 · Cir.
United States v. Gwinnett · Cir.
United States v. Navarro · Cir.
Charles Emmenegger v. Bull Moose Tube Co. 324 F.3d 616 · Cir.
United States v. Walker · Cir.
United States v. Levinson · Cir.
Umland v. Planco Fin Ser Inc · Cir.
Pichler v. UNITE · Cir.
United States v. Leveto · Cir.
Combs v. Homer Ctr Sch Dist · Cir.
Combs v. Homer Ctr Sch Dist · Cir.
United States v. Rose · Cir.
United States v. William Delee Hardy · Cir.
United States v. Stevens · Cir.
DiCarlo v. St Mary Hosp · Cir.
Phila Marine v. Comm IRS · Cir.
United States v. Hall · Cir.
United States v. Michael Meyer · Cir.
United States v. Ronald Robinson · Cir.
United States v. Jane Bevans · Cir.
United States v. Joe Vincent · Cir.
Urban Hotel Development Compan v. President Development Group · Cir.
Barry J. Jewell v. United States · Cir.
General Mills, Inc. v. United States · Cir.
United States v. Tommy Rollins, Jr. · Cir.
United States v. Tomko · Cir.
United States v. James Aldridge, Jr. · Cir.
United States v. Joe Vincent · Cir.
United States v. Marco Laboy-Torres · Cir.
Peter Knappe v. United States · Cir.
United States v. Vernon 814 F.3d 1091 · Cir.
United States v. Diane Davis 815 F.3d 253 · Cir.
United States v. Patricia McQuarry 816 F.3d 1054 · Cir.
Slobodian v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service 822 F.3d 144 · Cir.
MRL Development I, LLC v. Whitecap Investment Corp. 64 V.I. 724 · Cir.
United States v. One (1) Palmetto State Armory PA-15 MacHinegun Receiver/Frame 822 F.3d 136 · Cir.
Lewis v. Bank of America NA 347 F.3d 587 · Cir.
United States v. Dustin Allen Wolff 830 F.3d 755 · Cir.
Charles Gragg v. United States 831 F.3d 1189 · Cir.
United States v. Everett Miller 833 F.3d 274 · Cir.
Associated Builders & Contractors Inc. v. City of Jersey City 836 F.3d 412 · Cir.
United States v. Marinello · Cir.
United States v. Boisseau 841 F.3d 1122 · Cir.
Capitol Indemnity v. USA · Cir.
Robert Polsky v. United States 844 F.3d 170 · Cir.
United States v. Julilath Kouangvan 844 F.3d 996 · Cir.
Ronald Tussey v. ABB 850 F.3d 951 · Cir.
United States v. Justin Stegall 850 F.3d 981 · Cir.
Chai v. Commissioner 851 F.3d 190 · Cir.
Rodriguez v. United States 852 F.3d 67 · Cir.
United States v. Kevin Harris 854 F.3d 1053 · Cir.
Leathers v. Leathers 856 F.3d 729 · Cir.
Green Solution Retail, Inc. v. United States 855 F.3d 1111 · Cir.
United States v. Gary Cardaci 856 F.3d 267 · Cir.
Washington Mutual, Inc. v. United States 856 F.3d 711 · Cir.
United States v. Chaka Fattah, Jr. 858 F.3d 801 · Cir.
Twenty-Two Strategic Investment Funds v. United States 859 F.3d 684 · Cir.
United States v. William Council 860 F.3d 604 · Cir.
Said Hassen v. Government of the Virgin Islan 66 V.I. 973 · Cir.
United States v. Ronald White, Jr. 863 F.3d 784 · Cir.
Seneca Resources Corp. v. Township of Highland 863 F.3d 245 · Cir.
United States v. Charise Stone 866 F.3d 219 · Cir.
Retirement Committee of DAK Americas LLC v. Brewer 867 F.3d 471 · Cir.
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railroad 870 F.3d 244 · Cir.
United States v. Andrew Melton 870 F.3d 830 · Cir.
United States v. Stegman 873 F.3d 1215 · Cir.
United States v. Anthony Sertich, Jr. 879 F.3d 558 · Cir.
Green v. United States 880 F.3d 519 · Cir.
United States v. Jerome Wilson 880 F.3d 80 · Cir.
United States v. Robert Scully 882 F.3d 549 · Cir.
Mkt. Synergy Grp., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor 885 F.3d 676 · Cir.
United States v. CITGO Asphalt Ref. Co. (In Re Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd.) 886 F.3d 291 · Cir.
United States v. Corey Grant 887 F.3d 131 · Cir.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. President United States 888 F.3d 52 · Cir.
United States v. Harold Stanley 891 F.3d 735 · Cir.
United States v. Juan Ramos 892 F.3d 599 · Cir.
Alpenglow Botanicals, LLC v. United States 894 F.3d 1187 · Cir.
Bobby Dutta v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. 895 F.3d 1166 · Cir.
United States v. King Mountain Tobacco Company 899 F.3d 954 · Cir.
Americans for Prosperity Found v. Xavier Becerra 903 F.3d 1000 · Cir.
Robert Schultz, Jr. v. Midland Credit Management 905 F.3d 159 · Cir.
Tyler v. U.S. Dep't of Educ. Rehab. Servs. Admin. 904 F.3d 1167 · Cir.
United States v. Cox 906 F.3d 1170 · Cir.
Omega Forex Grp., LC v. United States 906 F.3d 1196 · Cir.
In Re McGraw-hill Global Educ. Holdings LLC 909 F.3d 48 · Cir.
United States v. Ibrahim McCants 911 F.3d 127 · Cir.
Arthur Bedrosian v. United States 912 F.3d 144 · Cir.
Bruce Schwartz v. Ardis Bogen 913 F.3d 777 · Cir.
United States v. Shaquandis Thurmond 914 F.3d 612 · Cir.
United States v. Ronald White, Jr. 915 F.3d 1195 · Cir.
United States v. Christy 916 F.3d 814 · Cir.
High Desert Relief, Inc. v. United States 917 F.3d 1170 · Cir.
United States v. Aracelis Ayala 917 F.3d 752 · Cir.
United States v. Mark Beckham 917 F.3d 1059 · Cir.
United States v. Johnson 920 F.3d 639 · Cir.
United States v. Ibrahim McCants 920 F.3d 169 · Cir.
United States v. Gorrell 922 F.3d 1117 · Cir.
Davinci Aircraft, Inc. v. United States 926 F.3d 1117 · Cir.
United States v. Hassan Osman 929 F.3d 962 · Cir.
Nadine Pellegrino v. TSA 937 F.3d 164 · Cir.
Donald Wayne Bush v. United States · Cir.
Donald Wayne Bush v. United States 939 F.3d 839 · Cir.
United States v. James Denton 944 F.3d 170 · Cir.
United States v. Steven Wang 944 F.3d 1081 · Cir.
Rumsey Land Company v. Resource Land Holdings 944 F.3d 1259 · Cir.
Arlin Geophysical Company v. United States 946 F.3d 1234 · Cir.
United States v. Ibrahim McCants 952 F.3d 416 · Cir.
Standing Akimbo, LLC v. United States 955 F.3d 1146 · Cir.
United States v. Lecharles Baldon · Cir.
Wells Fargo & Company v. United States 957 F.3d 840 · Cir.
Judith Badgley v. United States 957 F.3d 969 · Cir.
Rosner v. United States 958 F.3d 163 · Cir.
City of Oakland v. Bp P.L.C. 969 F.3d 895 · Cir.
United States v. RaPower-3 960 F.3d 1240 · Cir.
United States v. RaPower-3 962 F.3d 1244 · Cir.
Andrea Schmitt v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 965 F.3d 945 · Cir.
TLS Mgmt. and Mktg. Ser. LLC v. Rodriguez-Toledo 966 F.3d 46 · Cir.
Francesca Allen v. Wells Fargo & Company 967 F.3d 767 · Cir.
United States v. Gehrmann 966 F.3d 1074 · Cir.
United States v. Thomas Kuzma 967 F.3d 959 · Cir.
Carlton Gunn v. Continental Casualty Company · Cir.
Carlton Gunn v. Continental Casualty Company 968 F.3d 802 · Cir.
Carlton Gunn v. Continental Casualty Company · Cir.
City of Oakland v. Bp P.L.C. · Cir.
United States v. Ellen Swenson 971 F.3d 977 · Cir.
United States v. Jovon Medley 972 F.3d 399 · Cir.
Rodney Harrell v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation 976 F.3d 434 · Cir.
United States v. Scott Capps 977 F.3d 250 · Cir.
United States v. Komron Allahyari 980 F.3d 684 · Cir.
Lisa Folajtar v. Attorney General USA 980 F.3d 897 · Cir.
United States v. Evelyn Sineneng-Smith 982 F.3d 766 · Cir.
United States v. Maynard 984 F.3d 948 · Cir.
United States v. Kenneth Smukler 986 F.3d 229 · Cir.
Grand River Enterprises v. Boughton 988 F.3d 114 · Cir.
United States v. Eric Woodberry 987 F.3d 1231 · Cir.
United States v. Kenneth Smukler 991 F.3d 472 · Cir.
United States v. Jane Boyd 991 F.3d 1077 · Cir.
United States v. David Shulick 994 F.3d 123 · Cir.
Minemyer v. CIR 995 F.3d 781 · Cir.
Rexing Quality Eggs v. Rembrandt Enterprises, Inc. · Cir.
Eric Gilbert v. United States 998 F.3d 410 · Cir.
United States v. Willie Hardy, Jr. 999 F.3d 250 · Cir.
Big Sandy Rancheria Enters. v. Rob Bonta 1 F.4th 710 · Cir.
Maehr v. U.S. Department of State 5 F.4th 1100 · Cir.
United States v. Chad Mink 9 F.4th 590 · Cir.
United States v. Shawn Quinnones 16 F.4th 414 · Cir.
United States v. Jason Schaefer 13 F.4th 875 · Cir.
United States v. David Shulick · Cir.
United States v. David Shulick · Cir.
United States v. Rao Desu · Cir.
Wallace v. Rogers 513 F.3d 212 · Cir.
Byers v. Intuit, Inc. 600 F.3d 286 · Cir.
United States v. Keller 666 F.3d 103 · Cir.
United States v. Bansal 663 F.3d 634 · Cir.
Marshall Naify Revocable Trust v. United States 672 F.3d 620 · Cir.
United States v. Moyer 674 F.3d 192 · Cir.
Shaver v. Siemens Corp. 670 F.3d 462 · Cir.
United States v. Louper-Morris 672 F.3d 539 · Cir.
United States v. Rodney Flucas 22 F.4th 1149 · Cir.
United States v. Teresa Barringer 25 F.4th 239 · Cir.
Estate of Palumbo v. United States 675 F.3d 234 · Cir.
ACS RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. v. Griffin 676 F.3d 512 · Cir.
Birdman v. Office of the Governor 677 F.3d 167 · Cir.
United States v. Whiteford 676 F.3d 348 · Cir.
Mabel Samons v. Nat'l Mines Corp. 25 F.4th 455 · Cir.
Lisa Milkovich v. United States 28 F.4th 1 · Cir.
Taylor v. United Parcel Service, Inc. 554 F.3d 510 · Cir.
United States v. Volodymyr Kvashuk 29 F.4th 1077 · Cir.
United States v. Williams · Cir.
United States v. Jason Woodring 35 F.4th 633 · Cir.
United States v. E.R.R. 35 F.4th 405 · Cir.
United States v. Justin Werle 35 F.4th 1195 · Cir.
United States v. Richard Collins 36 F.4th 487 · Cir.
United States v. Demetrius Bailey · Cir.
United States v. Clark 577 F.3d 273 · Cir.
Garrett Kajmowicz v. Matthew Whitaker 42 F.4th 138 · Cir.
United States v. Garza 593 F.3d 385 · Cir.
Becker v. Mack Trucks, Inc. 281 F.3d 372 · Cir.
Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Strand 305 F.3d 580 · Cir.
United States v. Poole 2 F. App'x 433 · Cir.
United States v. White 33 F. App'x 43 · Cir.
Holland v. Atlas Alloys Co. 36 F. App'x 482 · Cir.
United States v. Romine 37 F. App'x 583 · Cir.
Golden v. Government of the Virgin Islands 47 F. App'x 620 · Cir.
Zylla v. Unisys Corp. 57 F. App'x 79 · Cir.
United States v. Marc Willy 40 F.4th 1074 · Cir.
United States v. Harold D. Farley Gail D. Farley 202 F.3d 198 · Cir.
United Dominion Industries, Incorporated v. United States 208 F.3d 452 · Cir.
United States v. Indalecio Arrellano 213 F.3d 427 · Cir.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered Agent 215 F.3d 407 · Cir.
In Re GRAND JURY SUBPOENA 223 F.3d 213 · Cir.
Bernard Cavegn v. Twin City Pipe Trades Pension Plan 223 F.3d 827 · Cir.
United States v. Sandra Wert-Ruiz, A/K/A the Lady Sandra Wert-Ruiz 228 F.3d 250 · Cir.
Reg G. Garratt v. James E. Knowles, Nancy Knowles, Charles L. Knowles, Katherine Knowles Strasburg, Margaret Knowles Schink, E. Lawrence Keyes, R. Euguene Goodson, Defrees & Fisk and John W. Hupp 245 F.3d 941 · Cir.
Doris Alma Lucille Hansen, of the Estate of Christian C. Hansen, Deceased v. United States 248 F.3d 761 · Cir.
Horsehead Industries, Inc. v. Paramount Communications, Inc. 258 F.3d 132 · Cir.
Charles Francisco Cecilia Francisco v. United States 267 F.3d 303 · Cir.
United States v. Arthur Pena 268 F.3d 215 · Cir.
Bethlehem Steel Corporation and Affiliated Subsidiary Companies v. United States 270 F.3d 135 · Cir.
Coltec Industries, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Four Leaf Coal Company, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation L.G. Wasson Coal Mining Corp., an Indiana Corporation v. William P. Hobgood Michael H. Holland Marty Hudson Thomas O.S. Rand Elliot A. Segal Carlton R. Sickles Gail R. Wilensky, as Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Combined Fund United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Trust United States of America, Intervenor in D.C. Coltec Industries, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Four Leaf Coal Company, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation L.G. Wasson Coal Mining Corp., an Indiana Corporation v. William P. Hobgood Michael H. Holland Marty Hudson Thomas O.S. Rand Elliot A. Segal Carlton R. Sickles Gail R. Wilensky, as Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Combined Find United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund United States of America, Intervenor in D.C., Coltec Industries, Inc. 280 F.3d 262 · Cir.
Larry Becker v. Mack Trucks, Inc. 281 F.3d 372 · Cir.
James L. Thom Jean M. Thom v. United States of America, Leroy W. Thom Jean E. Thom v. United States of America, David W. Thom Janis Thom v. United States of America, Tom Thom Ladena Thom v. United States 283 F.3d 939 · Cir.
Nick J. D'Amico Cliff Hollihan Joseph G. Muto Kevin Beam v. CBS Corporation, F/k/a Westinghouse, Inc the Westinghouse Electric Company Pension Plan 297 F.3d 287 · Cir.
United States v. Steven B. Zats 298 F.3d 182 · Cir.
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Government of the Virgin Islands, Bureau of Internal Revenue 300 F.3d 320 · Cir.
Russell Mushalla v. Teamsters Local No. 863 Pension Fund 300 F.3d 391 · Cir.
In Re Cm Holdings, Inc. 301 F.3d 96 · Cir.
Andrew Neuens v. City of Columbus, Officer Isaac Bridges 303 F.3d 667 · Cir.
Massey Coal Company, Inc. v. Massanari 305 F.3d 226 · Cir.
Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. John G. Strand 305 F.3d 580 · Cir.
United States v. Alonzo Thornton 306 F.3d 1355 · Cir.
Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue v. Chase Manhattan Bank, Defendant/third-Party v. William Lansdale, Third-Party 312 F.3d 131 · Cir.
Mark Levy v. Sterling Holding Company, LLC National Semiconductor Corporation Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc 314 F.3d 106 · Cir.
United States v. John A. Gambone, Sr. A/K/A Jack John A. Gambone, Sr., United States of America v. Anthony Gambone A/K/A Tony Anthony Gambone 314 F.3d 163 · Cir.
United States v. Dmitri Keigue 318 F.3d 437 · Cir.
Broselow v. Fisher 319 F.3d 605 · Cir.
Emmenegger v. Bull Moose Tube Company 324 F.3d 616 · Cir.
United States v. Glennis L. Bolden, United States of America v. Clifford E. Bolden 325 F.3d 471 · Cir.
Lexington National Insurance Corporation v. Ranger Insurance Company 326 F.3d 416 · Cir.
Scott v. United States 328 F.3d 132 · Cir.
United States v. William R. Jenkins 333 F.3d 151 · Cir.
United States v. Frederick Schultz 333 F.3d 393 · Cir.
William H. Burstein, M.D. v. Retirement Account Plan For Employees Of Allegheny Health Education And Research Foundation 334 F.3d 365 · Cir.
New York Football Giants, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 349 F.3d 102 · Cir.
In Re: Pillowtex, Inc. Duke Energy Royal, LLC v. Pillowtex Corporation 349 F.3d 711 · Cir.
United States v. Robert Junior Wardrick 350 F.3d 446 · Cir.
Inductotherm Industries, Inc. v. United States 351 F.3d 120 · Cir.
United States v. Abdul Grier 354 F.3d 210 · Cir.
United States v. Reginald Charles Rose, III 357 F.3d 615 · Cir.
Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas Company 364 F.3d 135 · Cir.
Data Marketing Partnership v. LABR 45 F.4th 846 · Cir.
Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc-Pension Fund v. Kero Leasing Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation Robert C. Holmes, a Proprietor, Individually, Jointly and Severally Holmes Leasing Company, a Proprietorship Robert C. Holmes v. Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc.-Pension Fund Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey, Welfare Fund, Inc.-Pension Fund, Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc-Pension Fund v. Kero Leasing Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation Robert C. Holmes, a Proprietor, Individually, Jointly and Severally Holmes Leasing Company, a Proprietorship Robert C. Holmes v. Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc.-Pension Fund Robert C. Holmes 377 F.3d 288 · Cir.
United States Department Of Labor v. North Carolina Growers Association 377 F.3d 345 · Cir.
David A. Field and Ellen J. Field v. United States of America, Docket No. 03-6246-Cv 381 F.3d 109 · Cir.
United States v. Michael J. Grasso, Jr. 381 F.3d 160 · Cir.
Gencorp, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Olin Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant 390 F.3d 433 · Cir.
United States v. Stephen G. Bundy 392 F.3d 641 · Cir.
United States v. William Delee Hardy 393 F.3d 747 · Cir.
Robert L. Schulz v. Internal Revenue Service and Anthony Roundtree, Docket No. 04-0196-Cv 395 F.3d 463 · Cir.
United States v. B & D Vending, Inc. James Clay Boyd 398 F.3d 728 · Cir.
United States v. Michael Norwood 49 F.4th 189 · Cir.
United States v. George Atiyeh United States of America v. George Atiyeh 402 F.3d 354 · Cir.
Gene Romero v. The Allstate Corporation 404 F.3d 212 · Cir.
Cecilia Nichols v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Docket No. 04-1445-Cv 406 F.3d 98 · Cir.
United States v. Thurston Paul Bell 414 F.3d 474 · Cir.
Howard D. Popky Sheila A. Popky v. United States 419 F.3d 242 · Cir.
In Re: Schering-Plough Corporation Erisa Litigation, Jingdong Zhu, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated Adrian Fields, on Behalf of Himself/herself and All Others Similarly Situated 420 F.3d 231 · Cir.
United States v. Darin L. Hedgepeth 434 F.3d 609 · Cir.
United States v. Terrance Ross Willaman 437 F.3d 354 · Cir.
United States of America, and U.S. District Court Western District of New York v. Darnyl Parker 439 F.3d 81 · Cir.
United States v. Ronald E. Robinson 439 F.3d 777 · Cir.
United States v. Michael Meyer 439 F.3d 855 · Cir.
United States v. Dorothea Daraio 445 F.3d 253 · Cir.
Reese Brothers, Inc. v. United States 447 F.3d 229 · Cir.
Eastman Kodak Company v. Stwb, Inc. 452 F.3d 215 · Cir.
Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. United States of America, United States of America and Commissioner of Internal Revenue 452 F.3d 428 · Cir.
Kolari v. New York-Presbyterian Hospital 455 F.3d 118 · Cir.
George J. Kenney v. United States of America, and Ticor Title Co. Of California, Defendant-Counter-Claimant. George J. Kenney v. United States of America, and Ticor Title Co. Of California, Defendant-Counter-Claimant. George J. Kenney v. United States of America, and Ticor Title Co. Of California First Select Inc. Eskanos & Adler, Pc, George J. Kenney v. United States of America, and Ticor Title Co. Of California First Select Inc. Eskanos & Adler, Pc 458 F.3d 1025 · Cir.
Karen Cetel Morton Schneider Marvin Cetel Marvin Cetel, M.D., P.A. Barbara Schneider Barbara Schneider, M.D., F.A.C.S., P.A. v. Kirwan Financial Group, Inc. Barry Cohen Michael Kirwan Neil Prupis Lampf, Lipkind, Prupis, Petigrow & Labue Raymond G. Ankner Cja Associates Beaven Companies, Inc. Medical Society of New Jersey Inter-American Insurance Co. Of Illinois Commonwealth Life Insurance Co. Peoples Security Life Insurance Co. Monumental Life Insurance Co. Capital Holding Company Aegon Insurance Group Indianapolis Life Insurance Co. (District of New Jersey Civil No. 00-Cv-5799). Vijay Sankhla, M.D., on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Commonwealth Life Insurance Company Peoples Security Life Insurance Company Providian Life Insurance Company Aegon USA Inc. Monumental Life Insurance Company Indianapolis Life Insurance Co. Raymond G. Ankner Beaven Companies, Inc. Cja and Associates Kirwan Financial Group, Inc. Kirwan Financial Advisory, Inc. Barry Cohen Michael Kirwan Pacific Executive Services Stephen R. Ross Donald S. Murphy Sea Nine Associate Dsm, Inc. New Jersey Medical Profession Association Southern California Medical Profession Association the Medical Society of New Jersey Neil Prupis. (District of New Jersey Civil No. 01-Cv-04781) Vijay Sankhla, M.D., Yale Shulman, M.D., Yale Shulman, M.D., P.A., Boris Pearlman, M.D. Denville Radiology, P.A., Marvin Cetel, M.D., Karen Cetel, Marvin Cetel, M.D., P.A., Barbara Schneider, M.D., Morton Schneider, Barbara Schneider, M.D. P.A., (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.). Karen Cetel Morton Schneider Marvin Cetel Marvin Cetel, M.D., P.A. Barbara Schneider Barbara Schneider, M.D., F.A.C.S., P.A. v. Kirwan Financial Group, Inc. Barry Cohen Michael Kirwan Neil Prupis Lampf, Lipkind, Prupis, Petigrow & Labue Raymond G. Ankner Cja Associates Beaven Companies, Inc. Medical Society of New Jersey Inter-American Insurance Co. Of Illinois Commonwealth Life Insurance Co. Peoples Security Life Insurance Co. Monumental Life Insurance Co. Capital Holding Company Aegon Insurance Group Indianapolis Life Insurance Co. (District of New Jersey Civil No. 00-Cv-5799). Vijay Sankhla, M.D., on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Commonwealth Life Insurance Company Peoples Security Life Insurance Company Providian Life Insurance Company Aegon USA Inc. Monumental Life Insurance Company Indianapolis Life Insurance Co. Raymond G. Ankner Beaven Companies, Inc. Cja and Associates Kirwan Financial Group, Inc. Kirwan Financial Advisory, Inc. Barry Cohen Michael Kirwan Pacific Executive Services Stephen R. Ross Donald S. Murphy Sea Nine Associate Dsm, Inc. New Jersey Medical Profession Association Southern California Medical Profession Association the Medical Society of New Jersey Neil Prupis. (District of New Jersey Civil No. 01-Cv-04781). Marvin Cetel, M.D., Karen Cetel, Marvin Cetel, M.D., P.A., Barbara Schneider, M.D., Morton Schneider, Barbara Schneider, M.D. P.A., Karen Cetel Morton Schneider Marvin Cetel Marvin Cetel, M.D., P.A. Barbara Schneider Barbara Schneider, M.D., F.A.C.S., P.A. v. Kirwan Financial Group, Inc. Barry Cohen Michael Kirwan Neil Prupis Lampf, Lipkind, Prupis, Petigrow & Labue Raymond G. Ankner Cja Associates Beaven Companies, Inc. Medical Society of New Jersey Inter-American Insurance Co. Of Illinois Commonwealth Life Insurance Co. Peoples Security Life Insurance Co. Monumental Life Insurance Co. Capital Holding Company Aegon Insurance Group Indianapolis Life Insurance Co. (District of New Jersey Civil No. 00-Cv-5799). Vijay Sankhla, M.D., on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Commonwealth Life Insurance Company Peoples Security Life Insurance Company Providian Life Insurance Company Aegon USA Inc. Monumental Life Insurance Company Indianapolis Life Insurance Co. Raymond G. Ankner Beaven Companies, Inc. Cja and Associates Kirwan Financial Group, Inc. Kirwan Financial Advisory, Inc. Barry Cohen Michael Kirwan Pacific Executive Services Stephen R. Ross Donald S. Murphy Sea Nine Associate Dsm, Inc. New Jersey Medical Profession Association Southern California Medical Profession Association the Medical Society of New Jersey Neil Prupis. (District of New Jersey Civil No. 01-Cv-04781). Donald S. Murphy, Pacific Executive Services, Dsm, Inc., Karen Cetel Morton Schneider Marvin Ceten Marvin Cetel, M.D., P.A. Barbara Schneider Barbara Schneider, M.D., F.A.C.S., P.A. v. Kirwan Financial Group, Inc. Barry Cohen Michael Kirwan Neil Prupis Lampf, Lipkind, Prupis, Petigrow & Labue Raymond G. Ankner Cja Associates Beaven Companies, Inc. Medical Society of New Jersey Inter-American Insurance Co. Of Illinois Commonwealth Life Insurance Co. Peoples Security Life Insurance Co. Monumental Life Insurance Co. Capital Holding Company Aegon Insurance Group Indianapolis Life Insurance Co. (District of New Jersey Civil No. 00-Cv-5799). Vijay Sankhla, M.D., on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Commonwealth Life Insurance Company Peoples Security Life Insurance Company Providian Life Insurance Company Aegon USA Inc. Monumental Life Insurance Company Indianapolis Life Insurance Co. Raymond G. Ankner Beaven Companies, Inc. Cja and Associates Kirwan Financial Group, Inc. Kirwan Financial Advisory, Inc. Barry Cohen Michael Kirwan Pacific Executive Services Stephen R. Ross Donald S. Murphy Sea Nine Associate Dsm, Inc. New Jersey Medical Profession Association Southern California Medical Profession Association the Medical Society of New Jersey Neil Prupis. (District of New Jersey Civil No. 01-Cv-04781). Monumental Life Insurance Company, Commonwealth Life Insurance Company, Capital Holding Corporation, and Aegon Usa, Inc. 460 F.3d 494 · Cir.
United States v. Michael Walker 473 F.3d 71 · Cir.
Warriner v. Stanton 475 F.3d 497 · Cir.
United States v. Angelica Gwinnett 483 F.3d 200 · Cir.
Richard Jakimas Dianne Flynn, Association Member Louis Ristagno, Association Member All Other Association Members John M. Adair John J. Adzima Bruce J. Aiello Thomas Aiello Jack Bailey Gerald A. Barrett Walter Beniuk Bruce Blanchard Rene Reis Braga Tedeusz Bukowski Edward Cabral Angelo Capalbo Richard Carlson Ralph Caso James Castelli Samuel Castronovo, Jr. Peter Chapman Paul D. Ciuppa Gary Cocozzo Laura Carbo Alan L. Curtis Paul Day Charles Delorenzi Peter Demodica, III Joseph Digiacomo Stefan Dziaba Walter Dziaba Michael Faron Ramond J. Feiner Andrew Feraco Paul Franek Lawrence Gelok Robert L. Glover Raymond Goetz Joseph Gomes Anthony Greco Daniel Green Johnny Haddley William J. Hahn Richard Hall David Hanrahan Deborah Helfrich Ronald Jones Alojzy Kalata James F. Kane Joseph M. Kaprowski Bernard Kapuscinski Jan Kasprowicz Michael Kennedy Robert J. Kohler Edward Kwasnik Flavio Labagnara Rosa Labagnara Robert J. Lenik Wojciech Leozenia Joseph MacDiarmid James F. Madigan William R. Malloy, Sr. Albert A. Marchione Anthony Mariano Edward B. Mayo Henry M. McAuliffe Mike Meechan Stephen E. Mellinger Lawrence Memice Donald A. Meyer Robert P. Mundt Nick Nardone Cheryl Negron Joseph M. Orolen Edward Pajak Robert Pavone Roger M. Perri Frank J. Petrasek William Pitt Peter Plafta Julian Pokrywa Ronald Pokrywa Roque N. Rivera Antonio Rizzi Barbara Robinson Samuel Rosamilia Roger Rotondi Chuck L. Rutan Albert Rybacki Andrew J. Saccoccia Jan Serafin Robert Shallcross Martha X. Skinner Donald D. Smith Anthony Spagnuolo Anthony J. Spano Sara Spano Anthony Spera Natale Turano Stephen R. Tyburczy Robert J. Veleber, Jr. William Villino Michael A. Vocaturo Marian Wojciechowski Leonard A. Zummo Ricki Blohm Frank Cavaliere Charlene Johnson Donald Breen John Tomaskovic 485 F.3d 770 · Cir.
Transamerica Assurance Corporation v. Settlement Capital Corporation, United States of America, Gary Steele 489 F.3d 256 · Cir.
United States v. DeMURO 677 F.3d 550 · Cir.
Judy Larson v. AT&T Mobility LLC 687 F.3d 109 · Cir.
United States v. Robert Lillard 685 F.3d 773 · Cir.
David McCorkle v. Bank of America Corporation 688 F.3d 164 · Cir.
United States v. Glorious Shavers 693 F.3d 363 · Cir.
United States v. Norman Stoerr 695 F.3d 271 · Cir.
National Security Systems, Inc. v. Iola 700 F.3d 65 · Cir.
United States v. Talvin Lawing 703 F.3d 229 · Cir.
Center for Individual Freedom v. Natalie H. Tennant 706 F.3d 270 · Cir.
U.S. Citizens Association v. Kathleen Sebeliux 705 F.3d 588 · Cir.
E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump · Cir.
United States v. Charles Weiss 52 F.4th 546 · Cir.
Eastman Kodak Co. v. STWB, Inc. 452 F.3d 215 · Cir.
Kolari v. New York-Presbyterian Hospital 455 F.3d 118 · Cir.
Swede v. Rochester Carpenters Pension Fund 467 F.3d 216 · Cir.
Treasurer of New Jersey v. United States Department of the Treasury 684 F.3d 382 · Cir.
United States v. Marinello 839 F.3d 209 · Cir.
Silver v. Smith 70 F. App'x 17 · Cir.
Berardi v. Internal Revenue Service Frederick L. Reigle 70 F. App'x 660 · Cir.
United States v. Senyszyn 338 F. App'x 201 · Cir.
United States v. Senyszyn 338 F. App'x 201 · Cir.
United States v. Bennett 341 F. App'x 776 · Cir.
United States v. Bennett 341 F. App'x 776 · Cir.
Smith v. North American Specialty Ins. 342 F. App'x 841 · Cir.
Smith v. North American Specialty Ins. 342 F. App'x 841 · Cir.
United States v. Moore 344 F. App'x 767 · Cir.
United States v. Moore 344 F. App'x 767 · Cir.
United States v. Levinson 350 F. App'x 756 · Cir.
United States v. Levinson 350 F. App'x 756 · Cir.
United States v. Tanchak 351 F. App'x 729 · Cir.
United States v. Tanchak 351 F. App'x 729 · Cir.
United States v. Poltonowicz 353 F. App'x 690 · Cir.
United States v. Poltonowicz 353 F. App'x 690 · Cir.
United States v. Nolasco 354 F. App'x 676 · Cir.
United States v. Nolasco 354 F. App'x 676 · Cir.
United States v. Evans 356 F. App'x 580 · Cir.
United States v. Evans 356 F. App'x 580 · Cir.
Moco Investments, Inc. v. United States 362 F. App'x 305 · Cir.
Moco Investments, Inc. v. United States 362 F. App'x 305 · Cir.
United States v. Shelton 364 F. App'x 733 · Cir.
United States v. Shelton 364 F. App'x 733 · Cir.
Hall-Ditchfield v. United States 366 F. App'x 391 · Cir.
Hall-Ditchfield v. United States 366 F. App'x 391 · Cir.
United States v. Donna 366 F. App'x 441 · Cir.
United States v. Donna 366 F. App'x 441 · Cir.
United States v. Mulvenna 367 F. App'x 348 · Cir.
United States v. Mulvenna 367 F. App'x 348 · Cir.
United States v. Kenner 370 F. App'x 281 · Cir.
United States v. Kenner 370 F. App'x 281 · Cir.
United States v. Street 370 F. App'x 343 · Cir.
United States v. Street 370 F. App'x 343 · Cir.
Single Employer Welfare Benefit Plan Trust v. Datalink Electronics, Inc. 372 F. App'x 294 · Cir.
Single Employer Welfare Benefit Plan Trust v. Datalink Electronics, Inc. 372 F. App'x 294 · Cir.
United States v. Reynolds 374 F. App'x 356 · Cir.
United States v. Reynolds 374 F. App'x 356 · Cir.
United States v. Trenk 385 F. App'x 254 · Cir.
Sarunas Abraitis v. United States 709 F.3d 641 · Cir.
United States v. Barry Sussman 709 F.3d 155 · Cir.
Peter Knappe v. United States 713 F.3d 1164 · Cir.
Vento v. Director of Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue 58 V.I. 753 · Cir.
Norwood v. Strada 249 F. App'x 269 · Cir.
United States v. Schiaffino 275 F. App'x 115 · Cir.
Patrick McGrogan v. Commissioner of Internal Reven 58 V.I. 804 · Cir.
United States v. Mark Ciavarella, Jr. 716 F.3d 705 · Cir.
American Petroleum Institute v. Roy Cooper, III 718 F.3d 347 · Cir.
Pleasures of San Patricio, Inc. v. Méndez-Torres 596 F.3d 1 · Cir.
United States v. Tiran Casteel 717 F.3d 635 · Cir.
Nevada Partners Fund, L.L.C. v. United States 720 F.3d 594 · Cir.
USA V. FOREST KIRST · Cir.
United States v. Troy Brasby 61 F.4th 127 · Cir.
United States v. Eric Ladeaux 61 F.4th 582 · Cir.
United States v. Julio Rivera 62 F.4th 778 · Cir.
United States v. State of Delaware Department o 66 F.4th 114 · Cir.
United States v. Albert Upshur 67 F.4th 178 · Cir.
Pejouhesh v. CIR 67 F.4th 676 · Cir.
United States v. James D. Paulson 68 F.4th 528 · Cir.
Stephen Pond v. United States 69 F.4th 155 · Cir.
Bryan Range v. Attorney General United States 69 F.4th 96 · Cir.
Patti Cahoo v. SAS Institute, Inc. · Cir.
United States v. Raquel Rivera 74 F.4th 134 · Cir.
United States v. Nylere Stanford 75 F.4th 309 · Cir.
United States v. Jeffrey Reed 75 F.4th 396 · Cir.
In Re: Richard York v. United States 78 F.4th 1074 · Cir.
United States v. Darron Henderson 80 F.4th 207 · Cir.
United States v. Richard Marschall 82 F.4th 774 · Cir.
United States v. Grigsby 86 F.4th 602 · Cir.
Gary Westerman v. United States 718 F.3d 743 · Cir.
United States v. Shiheem Amos 88 F.4th 446 · Cir.
United States v. Jesus Perez Garcia 96 F.4th 1166 · Cir.
God's Storehouse Topeka Church v. United States 98 F.4th 990 · Cir.
United States v. Shaun Allahyari 99 F.4th 486 · Cir.
Donald Wayne Bush v. United States 100 F.4th 807 · Cir.
United States v. Salvatore Groppo 102 F.4th 1083 · Cir.
United States v. Patrick Sutherland 103 F.4th 200 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.