§1331 — [§§1331 to 1337. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(a)(145)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1788 ] Section 1331, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 343 , related to war loss recoveries.

138 citing cases

Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §1331

Statute text not available for this section.

Treasury Regulations

Treas. Reg. §1.1331-1Recoveries in respect of war losses Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

(a)(1) The amount of any recovery in respect of war loss property must be included in gross income to the extent provided in section 1332 unless, pursuant to the taxpayer's election under section 1335, the provisions of section 1333 are applicable to such recovery. For the treatment of war loss recoveries under section 1333 and the manner of making the election under section 1335, see §§ 1.1333-1 and 1.1335-1.

(2) As used in this part, the term war loss property means property considered under section 127(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 as destroyed or seized, including any interest described in section 127(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939.

(3) For regulations governing the treatment of war losses under the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, see 26 CFR (1939) 29.127(a)-1 to 29.127(a)-4, inclusive, 29.127(b)-1, and 29.127(e)-1 (Regulations 111) and 26 CFR (1939) 39.127(a)-1 (Regulations 118).

(b) The recoveries in respect of any war loss property include the recovery of the same war loss property and the recovery of any money or property in lieu of such property or on account of the destruction or seizure of such property. For example, there is a recovery upon the return to the taxpayer after the termination of the war of his property which was treated as war loss property because it was located in a country at war with the United States. An award by a government on account of the seizure of the taxpayer's property by an enemy country is a recovery under this section. The amount obtained upon the sale or other transfer by the taxpayer of his right to any war loss property is also a recovery for the purpose of this section. Similarly, if a taxpayer who sustained a war loss upon the liquidation of a corporation has received the rights to any property of the corporation which was treated as war loss property, any recovery by the taxpayer with respect to such rights is a recovery by him for the purposes of this section.

(c) For the purpose of this section, the recoveries considered are only those with respect to war losses sustained in prior taxable years. Similarly, the only deductions considered are those allowable for prior taxable years, and any allowable deductions for the year of the recovery are ignored for the purposes of applying such section to the recovery.

(d) If a deduction was claimed under section 127(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 by a taxpayer in computing his tax for any taxable year and if such deduction was disallowed in whole or in part, any recovery in respect of the portion disallowed shall not be subject to the provisions of part IV (section 1331 and following), subchapter Q, chapter 1 of the Code.
Treas. Reg. §1.1331-1(a)§1.1331-1(a) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

(1) The amount of any recovery in respect of war loss property must be included in gross income to the extent provided in section 1332 unless, pursuant to the taxpayer's election under section 1335, the provisions of section 1333 are applicable to such recovery. For the treatment of war loss recoveries under section 1333 and the manner of making the election under section 1335, see §§ 1.1333-1 and 1.1335-1.

(2) As used in this part, the term war loss property means property considered under section 127(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 as destroyed or seized, including any interest described in section 127(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939.

(3) For regulations governing the treatment of war losses under the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, see 26 CFR (1939) 29.127(a)-1 to 29.127(a)-4, inclusive, 29.127(b)-1, and 29.127(e)-1 (Regulations 111) and 26 CFR (1939) 39.127(a)-1 (Regulations 118).
Treas. Reg. §1.1331-1(b)The recoveries in respect of any war loss property include the recovery of the same war loss property and the recovery of any money or property in lieu of such property or on account of the destruction or seizure of such property. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

The recoveries in respect of any war loss property include the recovery of the same war loss property and the recovery of any money or property in lieu of such property or on account of the destruction or seizure of such property. For example, there is a recovery upon the return to the taxpayer after the termination of the war of his property which was treated as war loss property because it was located in a country at war with the United States. An award by a government on account of the seizure of the taxpayer's property by an enemy country is a recovery under this section. The amount obtained upon the sale or other transfer by the taxpayer of his right to any war loss property is also a recovery for the purpose of this section. Similarly, if a taxpayer who sustained a war loss upon the liquidation of a corporation has received the rights to any property of the corporation which was treated as war loss property, any recovery by the taxpayer with respect to such rights is a recovery by him for the purposes of this section.
Treas. Reg. §1.1331-1(c)For the purpose of this section, the recoveries considered are only those with respect to war losses sustained in prior taxable years. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

For the purpose of this section, the recoveries considered are only those with respect to war losses sustained in prior taxable years. Similarly, the only deductions considered are those allowable for prior taxable years, and any allowable deductions for the year of the recovery are ignored for the purposes of applying such section to the recovery.
Treas. Reg. §1.1331-1(d)If a deduction was claimed under section 127(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 by a taxpayer in computing his tax for any taxable year and if such deduction was disallowed in whole or in part, any recovery in respect of the portion disallowed shall not be subject to the provisions of part IV (section 1331 and following), subchapter Q, chapter 1 of the Code. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

If a deduction was claimed under section 127(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 by a taxpayer in computing his tax for any taxable year and if such deduction was disallowed in whole or in part, any recovery in respect of the portion disallowed shall not be subject to the provisions of part IV (section 1331 and following), subchapter Q, chapter 1 of the Code.

138 Citing Cases

Adams v. Commissioner 160 T.C. No. 1 · 2023

§ 1331 in an appropriate case. See, e.g., Maehr, 5 F.4th at 1106–07. See generally 14 Charles 17 attributable to congressional oversight, as the text of section 7345 and the structure of FAST Act § 32101 confirm. As to the text, section 7345(a) expressly discusses three governmental actors—the Commissioner (who certifies a seriously delinquent tax

Michael Johnson & Cynthia Johnson, Petitioners 160 T.C. No. 2 · 2023

Section 179D(a) provides that “[t]there shall be allowed as a deduction an amount equal to the cost of energy efficient commercial building property placed in service during the taxable year.”7 For 7 As originally enacted in 2005, section 179D applied to property placed in service after December 31, 2005, and before January 1,

Rowen v. Commissioner 156 T.C. No. 8 · 2021

§ 1331 and that I.R.C. § 7345(e) provided the applicable waiver of sovereign immunity.”); see also Defendants’ Consolidated Reply in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment at 17-24, Jones v. Mnuchin, No. 1:19-cv-00222 (S.D. Ga. filed July 1, 2020) (arguing the merits of the t

Adams Challenge (UK) Limited, Petitioner · 2020

The OCS thus comprises a territorythat occupies many thousands ofsquare miles. Needless to say, a great variety ofmaritime activity--commercial and otherwise--occurs within this territory. These activities include fishing, shrimping, pleasure boating and sailing, and commercial transportation ofpersons and property. Section 638 expand

Ulloa v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2010-68 · 2010

section 1331(1) (2006) gives jurisdiction only to the Federal District Courts, and not . to the Tax Court . - 10 - document issue, which thus far, Respondent FAILED to address and has avoided . With his motions Mr . Ulloa submitted papers showing that the entities that had paid him wages and other income amounts in the years at issue were authoriz

Riverfront Groves, Inc. v. Commissioner 60 T.C. 435 · 1973

Sunvestment Energy Group NY 64 LLC v. National Grid USA Services Co., Inc. 116 F.4th 106 · Cir.

Natl Infusion Center v. Becerra 116 F.4th 488 · Cir.

Al Otro Lado v. Alejandro Mayorkas 138 F.4th 1102 · Cir.

TX Medical Association v. HHS · Cir.

New Jersey Primary Care Ass'n v. New Jersey Department of Human Services 722 F.3d 527 · Cir.

AMTAX Holdings 227, LLC v. CohnReznick LLP 136 F.4th 32 · Cir.

Al Otro Lado v. Kristi Noem · Cir.

Bristol Myers Squibb Co v. Secretary United States Department of HHS · Cir.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp v. Secretary United States Department of Health · Cir.

Novo Nordisk Inc v. Secretary US Dept & Health and Human Services · Cir.

Pagonis v. United States 575 F.3d 809 · Cir.

United States v. Stevens 533 F.3d 218 · Cir.

Munaco v. United States 522 F.3d 651 · Cir.

Battoni v. IBEW Local Union No. 102 Employee Pension Plan 594 F.3d 230 · Cir.

Leckey v. Stefano 501 F.3d 212 · Cir.

Mikulski v. Centerior Energy Corp. 501 F.3d 555 · Cir.

Berman v. United States 264 F.3d 16 · Cir.

Jordan Hospital, Inc. v. Shalala 276 F.3d 72 · Cir.

Johansen v. United States 506 F.3d 65 · Cir.

Cambridge Literary Properties, Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.M.B.H. & Co. Kg. 510 F.3d 77 · Cir.

Henderson v. UPMC 640 F.3d 524 · Cir.

Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Geithner 644 F.3d 836 · Cir.

New Jersey Physicians, Inc. v. President of the United States 653 F.3d 234 · Cir.

Renfro v. Unisys Corp. 671 F.3d 314 · Cir.

Henrikson v. Guzik · Cir.

Delaware County v. Federal Housing Finance Agency 747 F.3d 215 · Cir.

Alfredo Semper v. Curtis Gomez 60 V.I. 971 · Cir.

Robert Freedman v. Sumner Redstone 753 F.3d 416 · Cir.

NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. v. UBS Securities, LLC 770 F.3d 1010 · Cir.

Gary Vander Boegh v. EnergySolutions, Inc. 772 F.3d 1056 · Cir.

Joe Kannikal v. Attorney General United States 776 F.3d 146 · Cir.

Geneva College v. Secretary United States DePartment of Health 778 F.3d 422 · Cir.

Brown & Williamson v. FDA · Cir.

Sigmon Coal v. Apfel · Cir.

Grable & Sons Metal v. Darue Engineering · Cir.

Eastman v. Marine Mechanical · Cir.

Mikulski v. Centerior Energy Corp · Cir.

Munaco v. United States · Cir.

Inductotherm Ind Inc v. United States · Cir.

Burstein v. Retirement Account Plan for Employees of Allegheny Health Education & Research Foundation 334 F.3d 365 · Cir.

Conoshenti v. Pub Ser Elec & Gas · Cir.

United States v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. 432 F.3d 161 · Cir.

Popky v. United States · Cir.

Romero v. Allstate Corp. 404 F.3d 212 · Cir.

Knight v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n 457 F.3d 331 · Cir.

Bernard Cavegn v. Twin City Pipe · Cir.

Pichler v. UNITE · Cir.

Combs v. Homer Ctr Sch Dist · Cir.

United States v. Stevens · Cir.

Elaine Pagonis v. United States · Cir.

Laurence Kaplan v. Saint Peter's Healthcare Syste 810 F.3d 175 · Cir.

United States v. Diane Davis 815 F.3d 253 · Cir.

United States v. One (1) Palmetto State Armory PA-15 MacHinegun Receiver/Frame 822 F.3d 136 · Cir.

State of New York Ex Rel. Jacobson v. Wells Fargo National Bank, N.A. 824 F.3d 308 · Cir.

Willy v. Administrative Review Board 423 F.3d 483 · Cir.

Associated Builders & Contractors Inc. v. City of Jersey City 836 F.3d 412 · Cir.

Leathers v. Leathers 856 F.3d 729 · Cir.

United States v. Gary Cardaci 856 F.3d 267 · Cir.

Seneca Resources Corp. v. Township of Highland 863 F.3d 245 · Cir.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. President United States 888 F.3d 52 · Cir.

Larson v. United States 888 F.3d 578 · Cir.

Bobby Dutta v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. 895 F.3d 1166 · Cir.

Robert Schultz, Jr. v. Midland Credit Management 905 F.3d 159 · Cir.

In Re McGraw-hill Global Educ. Holdings LLC 909 F.3d 48 · Cir.

Arthur Bedrosian v. United States 912 F.3d 144 · Cir.

Xitronix Corporation v. KLA-Tencor Corporation 916 F.3d 429 · Cir.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. President United States 930 F.3d 543 · Cir.

City of Oakland v. Bp P.L.C. 969 F.3d 895 · Cir.

Black Bear Sports Group, Inc. v. Amateur Hockey Association of · Cir.

Andrea Schmitt v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 965 F.3d 945 · Cir.

City of Oakland v. Bp P.L.C. · Cir.

Lisa Folajtar v. Attorney General USA 980 F.3d 897 · Cir.

Derrick Taylor v. Angela Owens 990 F.3d 493 · Cir.

Rivero v. Fidlty Investments 1 F.4th 340 · Cir.

Maehr v. U.S. Department of State 5 F.4th 1100 · Cir.

Sharon Bauer v. Marc Elrich 8 F.4th 291 · Cir.

Tantaros v. Fox News Network, LLC 12 F.4th 135 · Cir.

AMTAX Holdings 227, LLC v. Tenants' Development II Corp. 15 F.4th 551 · Cir.

Byers v. Intuit, Inc. 600 F.3d 286 · Cir.

Shaver v. Siemens Corp. 670 F.3d 462 · Cir.

ACS RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. v. Griffin 676 F.3d 512 · Cir.

Crowell v. Shell Oil Co. 541 F.3d 295 · Cir.

Taylor v. United Parcel Service, Inc. 554 F.3d 510 · Cir.

United States v. Richard Collins 36 F.4th 487 · Cir.

Garrett Kajmowicz v. Matthew Whitaker 42 F.4th 138 · Cir.

Becker v. Mack Trucks, Inc. 281 F.3d 372 · Cir.

United States v. Harold D. Farley Gail D. Farley 202 F.3d 198 · Cir.

Bernard Cavegn v. Twin City Pipe Trades Pension Plan 223 F.3d 827 · Cir.

Sigmon Coal Company, Incorporated v. Kenneth S. Apfel 226 F.3d 291 · Cir.

Richard Paul Henrikson v. Bob Guzik 249 F.3d 395 · Cir.

Horsehead Industries, Inc. v. Paramount Communications, Inc. 258 F.3d 132 · Cir.

Bethlehem Steel Corporation and Affiliated Subsidiary Companies v. United States 270 F.3d 135 · Cir.

Larry Becker v. Mack Trucks, Inc. 281 F.3d 372 · Cir.

Nick J. D'Amico Cliff Hollihan Joseph G. Muto Kevin Beam v. CBS Corporation, F/k/a Westinghouse, Inc the Westinghouse Electric Company Pension Plan 297 F.3d 287 · Cir.

Broselow v. Fisher 319 F.3d 605 · Cir.

William H. Burstein, M.D. v. Retirement Account Plan For Employees Of Allegheny Health Education And Research Foundation 334 F.3d 365 · Cir.

Inductotherm Industries, Inc. v. United States 351 F.3d 120 · Cir.

Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas Company 364 F.3d 135 · Cir.

Jennifer Duncan v. Governor of the Virgin Islands 48 F.4th 195 · Cir.

California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Worldcom, Inc. 368 F.3d 86 · Cir.

Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Manufacturing 377 F.3d 592 · Cir.

Dotson v. Griesa 398 F.3d 156 · Cir.

Gene Romero v. The Allstate Corporation 404 F.3d 212 · Cir.

Howard D. Popky Sheila A. Popky v. United States 419 F.3d 242 · Cir.

Mikulski v. Centerior Energy Corporation 435 F.3d 666 · Cir.

John T. Eastman v. Marine Mechanical Corporation 438 F.3d 544 · Cir.

Chicago Tribune Co. v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois 680 F.3d 1001 · Cir.

National Security Systems, Inc. v. Iola 700 F.3d 65 · Cir.

California Public Employees' Retirement System v. WorldCom, Inc. 368 F.3d 86 · Cir.

Dotson v. Griesa 398 F.3d 156 · Cir.

Treasurer of New Jersey v. United States Department of the Treasury 684 F.3d 382 · Cir.

Single Employer Welfare Benefit Plan Trust v. Datalink Electronics, Inc. 372 F. App'x 294 · Cir.

Calderon-Serra v. Wilimington Trust Company 715 F.3d 14 · Cir.

John Roe v. Steven Dettelbach 59 F.4th 255 · Cir.

Bryan Range v. Attorney General United States 69 F.4th 96 · Cir.

Grace v. Board of Trustees, Brooke · Cir.

Tyngsboro Sports II Solar, LLC v. National Grid USA Service Co., Inc. 88 F.4th 58 · Cir.

Sylvia Vergara v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.

Ricardo Toledo v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.

Peter Straus v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.

Mirna Rodriguez v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.

Michael Zeifert v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.

Lorena Rebollar Sedano v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.

Lauren Bennett v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.

Keely Roberts v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. 98 F.4th 810 · Cir.

Joshua Chupack v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.

Elizabeth Turnipseed v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.

Bruce Sundheim v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.

Amelia Tenorio v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.

§1331 — [&sect;&sect;1331 to 1337. Repealed. Pub. L. 94&ndash;455, title XIX, &sect;1901(a)(145)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1788 ] Section 1331, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 343 , related to war loss recoveries.

138 Citing Cases

New cases, delivered.

§1331 — [§§1331 to 1337. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(a)(145)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1788 ] Section 1331, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 343 , related to war loss recoveries.