§1332

67 citing cases

Statute text not available for this section.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1332-1Inclusion in gross income of war loss recoveries Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) Amount of recovery. Except as provided in section 1333(1), the amount of the recovery in respect of a war loss in a previous taxable year is determined in the same manner for the purpose of either section 1332 or 1333. The amount of the recovery of any money or property in respect of any war loss is the aggregate of the amount of such money and of the fair market value of such property, both determined as of the date of the recovery. But see paragraph (a) of § 1.1333-1 for optional valuation where the taxpayer recovers the same war loss property.

    (b) Amount of gain includible. (1) A taxpayer who has sustained a war loss described in section 127(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 and who has not elected to have the provisions of section 1333 apply to any taxable year in which he recovered any money or property in respect of a war loss in any previous taxable year must include in his gross income for each taxable year, to the extent provided in section 1332, the amount of his recoveries of money and property for such taxable year in respect of any war loss in a previous taxable year. Section 1332 provides that such recoveries for any taxable year are not includible in income until the taxpayer has recovered an amount equal to his allowable deductions in prior taxable years on account of such war losses which did not result in a reduction of any tax under chapter 1 or 2 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. War loss recoveries are considered as made first on account of war losses allowable but not actually allowed as a deduction, and second on account of war losses allowed as a deduction but which did not result in a reduction of tax under chapter 1 or 2 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. If there were deductions allowed on account of war losses for two or more taxable years which did not result in a reduction of any tax under chapter 1 or 2 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, a recovery on account of such losses is considered as made on account of such losses in the order of the taxable years for which they were allowed beginning with the latest. See § 1.1337-1 for the determination of the amount of such deductions. Recoveries in excess of such amount are treated as ordinary income until such excess equals the amount of the taxpayer's allowable deductions in prior taxable years on account of war losses which did result in a reduction of any such tax under chapter 1 or 2 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. Any further recoveries in excess of all the taxpayer's allowable deductions in prior taxable years for war losses are treated as gain on an involuntary conversion of property as a result of its destruction or seizure, and such gain is recognized or not recognized under the provisions of section 1033. See section 1033 and the regulations thereunder. Such gain, if recognized, is included in gross income as ordinary income unless section 1231(a) applies to cause such gain to be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset held for more than six months. See section 1231(a) and the regulations thereunder.

    (2) The determination as to whether and to what extent any recoveries are to be included in gross income is made upon the basis of the amount of all the recoveries for each day upon which there are any such recoveries, as follows:

    (i) The amount of the recoveries for any day is not included in gross income, and is not considered gain on an involuntary conversion, to the extent, if any, that the aggregate of the allowable deductions in prior taxable years on account of war losses which did not result in a reduction of any tax of the taxpayer under chapter 1 or 2 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, as determined under § 1.1337-1, exceeds the amount of all previous recoveries in the same and prior taxable years.

    (ii) The amount of the recoveries for any day which is not excluded from gross income under subdivision (i) of this subparagraph is included in gross income as ordinary income, and is not considered gain on an involuntary conversion, to the extent, if any, that the aggregate of all the allowable deductions in prior taxable years on account of war losses (both those which resulted in a reduction of a tax of the taxpayer and those which did not) exceeds the sum of the amount of all previous recoveries in the same and prior taxable years and of that portion, if any, of the amount of the recoveries for such day which is not included in gross income under subdivision (i) of this subparagraph.

    (iii) The amount of the recoveries for any day which is not excluded from gross income under subdivision (i) of this subparagraph and is not included in gross income as ordinary income under subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph is considered gain on an involuntary conversion of property as a result of its destruction or seizure. The following provisions then apply to this gain:

    (a) Such gain is recognized or not recognized under the provisions of section 1033, relating to gain on the involuntary conversion of property. For the purpose of applying section 1033, such gain for any day is deemed to be expended in the manner provided in section 1033 to the extent the recovery for such day is so expended.

    (b) If such gain is recognized, it is included in gross income as ordinary income or, if the provisions of section 1231(a) apply and require such treatment, as gain on the sale or exchange of a capital asset held for more than six months. For the purpose of applying section 1231(a), such recognized gain for any day is deemed to be derived from property described in that section to the extent of the recovery for such day with respect to such property, except such portion of such recovery as is attributable to the nonrecognized gain for such day.

    (c) Section 1336 provides that in determining the unadjusted basis of recovered property, the total gain and the recognized gain with respect to such property must be determined. For such purpose, the recognized gain deemed to be derived from properties described in section 1231(a) may be allocated among such properties in the proportion of the recoveries with respect to such properties, reduced for each property by the portion of the recovery attributable to the nonrecognized gain for such day, and the recoveries with respect to properties not described in section 1231(a) may be similarly allocated. The total gain derived from any recovered property is the sum of the nonrecognized gain attributable to the recovery of such property and of the recognized gain allocable to such property.

    (3) The foregoing provisions may be illustrated by the following examples:

    (4) An allowable deduction with respect to a war loss is any deduction to which the taxpayer is entitled on account of any war loss property, regardless of whether or not such deduction was claimed by the taxpayer or otherwise allowed in computing his tax. If a deduction was claimed by a taxpayer in computing his tax for any taxable year and if such deduction was disallowed, such deduction will not be considered an allowable deduction for such taxable year since the previous determination will not be reconsidered.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1332-1(a)Such gain is recognized or not recognized under the provisions of section 1033, relating to gain on the involuntary conversion of property. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Such gain is recognized or not recognized under the provisions of section 1033, relating to gain on the involuntary conversion of property. For the purpose of applying section 1033, such gain for any day is deemed to be expended in the manner provided in section 1033 to the extent the recovery for such day is so expended.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1332-1(b)If such gain is recognized, it is included in gross income as ordinary income or, if the provisions of section 1231(a) apply and require such treatment, as gain on the sale or exchange of a capital asset held for more than six months. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    If such gain is recognized, it is included in gross income as ordinary income or, if the provisions of section 1231(a) apply and require such treatment, as gain on the sale or exchange of a capital asset held for more than six months. For the purpose of applying section 1231(a), such recognized gain for any day is deemed to be derived from property described in that section to the extent of the recovery for such day with respect to such property, except such portion of such recovery as is attributable to the nonrecognized gain for such day.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1332-1(c)Section 1336 provides that in determining the unadjusted basis of recovered property, the total gain and the recognized gain with respect to such property must be determined. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Section 1336 provides that in determining the unadjusted basis of recovered property, the total gain and the recognized gain with respect to such property must be determined. For such purpose, the recognized gain deemed to be derived from properties described in section 1231(a) may be allocated among such properties in the proportion of the recoveries with respect to such properties, reduced for each property by the portion of the recovery attributable to the nonrecognized gain for such day, and the recoveries with respect to properties not described in section 1231(a) may be similarly allocated. The total gain derived from any recovered property is the sum of the nonrecognized gain attributable to the recovery of such property and of the recognized gain allocable to such property.

    (3) The foregoing provisions may be illustrated by the following examples:

    (4) An allowable deduction with respect to a war loss is any deduction to which the taxpayer is entitled on account of any war loss property, regardless of whether or not such deduction was claimed by the taxpayer or otherwise allowed in computing his tax. If a deduction was claimed by a taxpayer in computing his tax for any taxable year and if such deduction was disallowed, such deduction will not be considered an allowable deduction for such taxable year since the previous determination will not be reconsidered.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.1332-1(i)The amount of the recoveries for any day is not included in gross income, and is not considered gain on an involuntary conversion, to the extent, if any, that the aggregate of the allowable deductions in prior taxable years on account of war losses which did not result in a reduction of any tax of the taxpayer under chapter 1 or 2 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, as determined under § 1. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    The amount of the recoveries for any day is not included in gross income, and is not considered gain on an involuntary conversion, to the extent, if any, that the aggregate of the allowable deductions in prior taxable years on account of war losses which did not result in a reduction of any tax of the taxpayer under chapter 1 or 2 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, as determined under § 1.1337-1, exceeds the amount of all previous recoveries in the same and prior taxable years.

    (ii) The amount of the recoveries for any day which is not excluded from gross income under subdivision (i) of this subparagraph is included in gross income as ordinary income, and is not considered gain on an involuntary conversion, to the extent, if any, that the aggregate of all the allowable deductions in prior taxable years on account of war losses (both those which resulted in a reduction of a tax of the taxpayer and those which did not) exceeds the sum of the amount of all previous recoveries in the same and prior taxable years and of that portion, if any, of the amount of the recoveries for such day which is not included in gross income under subdivision (i) of this subparagraph.

    (iii) The amount of the recoveries for any day which is not excluded from gross income under subdivision (i) of this subparagraph and is not included in gross income as ordinary income under subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph is considered gain on an involuntary conversion of property as a result of its destruction or seizure. The following provisions then apply to this gain:

67 Citing Cases

1332, "the distinction between an incorporated subsidiary and an unincorporated division is important * * * . 'A division ofa corporation does not possess the formal separateness * * * and thus is not an independent entity'" (quoting Schwartz v. Elec. Data Sys., Inc., 913 F.2d 279, 284 (6th Cir. 1990))); Stotter & Co. v. Amstar Corp. (In re Su

1332, "the distinction between an incorporated subsidiary and an unincorporated division is important * * * . 'A division ofa corporation does not possess the formal separateness * * * and thus is not an independent entity'" (quoting Schwartz v. Elec. Data Sys., Inc., 913 F.2d 279, 284 (6th Cir. 1990))); Stotter & Co. v. Amstar Corp. (In re Su

1332(a) (2012) ("The district courts shall have originaljurisdiction ofall civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of$75,000".); id. sec. 1346 ("The district courts shall have originaljurisdiction, concurrent with the United States Court ofFederal _ 9 _ Claims, of* * * [a]ny other civil action or claim against t

Stanko v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1996-530 · 1996

That Court filed its Memorandum of Decision on January 11, 1991. In it, the District Court found that petitioner and Stanko intended to defraud Stanko's creditors, Giove v. Stanko, supra, slip op. at 14, and that Stanko was insolvent and had been since September 17, 1984, id. at 9-10. The District Court held that Stanko's transfers of

are not dealing with refund, diversity jurisdiction, or tort claims; (2) we are not compelled to follow the rationale of refund, diversity, or Federal tort claims cases; and, significantly, (3) the dissent relies on the diversity cases despite Congress’ having enacted legislation that effectively “overrules” them.

Estate of Clack v. Commissioner 106 T.C. 131 · 1996

1332 was amended in 1988 to ensure that the citizenship of represented parties will be determined according to the citizenship of the represented party — not the fiduciary. 134 Cong. Rec. 31051 (1988). Congress was concerned with attorneys’ using out-of-State fiduciaries solely to create diversity of citizenship for access to the Federal court

Lippolis v. Commissioner 143 T.C. 393 · 2014
Meier v. Commissioner 91 T.C. 273 · 1988
Lydon v. Commissioner 56 T.C. 128 · 1971
Full Circle Villagebrook GP, LLC v. Protech 2004-D, LLC 119 F.4th 522 · Cir.
AMTAX Holdings 227, LLC v. CohnReznick LLP 136 F.4th 32 · Cir.
DiCarlo v. St. Mary Hospital 530 F.3d 255 · Cir.
United States v. Laboy-Torres 553 F.3d 715 · Cir.
Edwards v. HOVENSA, LLC 497 F.3d 355 · Cir.
Umland v. PLANCO Financial Services, Inc. 542 F.3d 59 · Cir.
United States v. Marzzarella 614 F.3d 85 · Cir.
Lohnes v. Level 3 Communications, Inc. 272 F.3d 49 · Cir.
Cambridge Literary Properties, Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.M.B.H. & Co. Kg. 510 F.3d 77 · Cir.
Waldron v. George Weston Bakeries Inc. 570 F.3d 5 · Cir.
Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Geithner 644 F.3d 836 · Cir.
Hussain v. Boston Old Colony Insurance 311 F.3d 623 · Cir.
Grable & Sons Metal v. Darue Engineering · Cir.
SE TX Inns Inc v. May-Ridge, L.P. · Cir.
Lexington Natl Ins v. Ranger Ins Co · Cir.
Edwards v. Hovensa LLC · Cir.
Umland v. Planco Fin Ser Inc · Cir.
DiCarlo v. St Mary Hosp · Cir.
United States v. Marco Laboy-Torres · Cir.
MRL Development I, LLC v. Whitecap Investment Corp. 64 V.I. 724 · Cir.
Tilden v. Commissioner 846 F.3d 882 · Cir.
Medical College of Wisconsin v. United States · Cir.
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railroad 870 F.3d 244 · Cir.
United States v. Aracelis Ayala 917 F.3d 752 · Cir.
Squeri v. Mount Ida College 954 F.3d 56 · Cir.
Black Bear Sports Group, Inc. v. Amateur Hockey Association of · Cir.
Black Bear Sports Group, Inc. v. Amateur Hockey Association of · Cir.
Rexing Quality Eggs v. Rembrandt Enterprises, Inc. · Cir.
Roderick Magadia v. Wal-Mart Associates · Cir.
Roderick Magadia v. Wal-Mart Associates 999 F.3d 668 · Cir.
Rivero v. Fidlty Investments 1 F.4th 340 · Cir.
AMTAX Holdings 227, LLC v. Tenants' Development II Corp. 15 F.4th 551 · Cir.
Birdman v. Office of the Governor 677 F.3d 167 · Cir.
Speroni S.P.A. v. Perceptron, Inc. 12 F. App'x 355 · Cir.
Lexington National Insurance Corporation v. Ranger Insurance Company 326 F.3d 416 · Cir.
Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Manufacturing 377 F.3d 592 · Cir.
Pitman Farms v. Kuehl Poultry, LLC 48 F.4th 866 · Cir.
Wachovia Bank, National Association v. Daniel G. Schmidt, Iii 445 F.3d 762 · Cir.
Southeast Texas Inns, Inc. v. Prime Hospitality Corporation 462 F.3d 666 · Cir.
Warriner v. Stanton 475 F.3d 497 · Cir.
Fisherman's Harvest, Inc., C. Joe Nelson, Jr., Doris Mae Nelson, Vanessa Jo Nelson Vallejo, Vickie Jo Nelson Salazar, and Nelson Fisherman's Harvest, Inc., and Childress Seafood, Inc., W.F. Childress, and Alton Lee Kelly v. Pbs & J (Formerly Known as Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc.), and Bertucci Contracting Corporation, and Luhr Brothers, Inc., and Bradley Industrial Textiles, Inc., and Nicolon Corporation (Also Known as Ten Cate Nicolon), and Huston & Associates, Inc., and Weeks Marine, Inc., Defendant/third Party v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Third Party 490 F.3d 1371 · Cir.
Judy Larson v. AT&T Mobility LLC 687 F.3d 109 · Cir.
RTR Technologies, Inc. v. Helming 707 F.3d 84 · Cir.
Medical College of Wisconsin Affiliated Hospitals, Inc. v. United States 854 F.3d 930 · Cir.
Single Employer Welfare Benefit Plan Trust v. Datalink Electronics, Inc. 372 F. App'x 294 · Cir.
Single Employer Welfare Benefit Plan Trust v. Datalink Electronics, Inc. 372 F. App'x 294 · Cir.
Sylvia Vergara v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Ricardo Toledo v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Peter Straus v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Mirna Rodriguez v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Michael Zeifert v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Lorena Rebollar Sedano v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Lauren Bennett v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Keely Roberts v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. 98 F.4th 810 · Cir.
Joshua Chupack v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Elizabeth Turnipseed v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Bruce Sundheim v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Amelia Tenorio v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.