§1367 — Adjustments to basis of stock of shareholders, etc.

75 cases·24 followed·1 distinguished·8 questioned·9 overruled·33 cited32% support

(a)General rule
(1)Increases in basis

The basis of each shareholder’s stock in an S corporation shall be increased for any period by the sum of the following items determined with respect to that shareholder for such period:

(A)

the items of income described in subparagraph (A) of section 1366(a)(1),

(B)

any nonseparately computed income determined under subparagraph (B) of section 1366(a)(1), and

(C)

the excess of the deductions for depletion over the basis of the property subject to depletion.

(2)Decreases in basis

The basis of each shareholder’s stock in an S corporation shall be decreased for any period (but not below zero) by the sum of the following items determined with respect to the shareholder for such period:

(A)

distributions by the corporation which were not includible in the income of the shareholder by reason of section 1368,

(B)

the items of loss and deduction described in subparagraph (A) of section 1366(a)(1),

(C)

any nonseparately computed loss determined under subparagraph (B) of section 1366(a)(1),

(D)

any expense of the corporation not deductible in computing its taxable income and not properly chargeable to capital account, and

(E)

the amount of the shareholder’s deduction for depletion for any oil and gas property held by the S corporation to the extent such deduction does not exceed the proportionate share of the adjusted basis of such property allocated to such shareholder under section 613A(c)(11)(B).

The decrease under subparagraph (B) by reason of a charitable contribution (as defined in section 170(c)) of property shall be the amount equal to the shareholder’s pro rata share of the adjusted basis of such property.

(b)Special rules
(1)Income items

An amount which is required to be included in the gross income of a shareholder and shown on his return shall be taken into account under subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (a)(1) only to the extent such amount is included in the shareholder’s gross income on his return, increased or decreased by any adjustment of such amount in a redetermination of the shareholder’s tax liability.

(2)Adjustments in basis of indebtedness
(A)Reduction of basis

If for any taxable year the amounts specified in subparagraphs (B), (C), (D), and (E) of subsection (a)(2) exceed the amount which reduces the shareholder’s basis to zero, such excess shall be applied to reduce (but not below zero) the shareholder’s basis in any indebtedness of the S corporation to the shareholder.

(B)Restoration of basis

If for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 1982, there is a reduction under subparagraph (A) in the shareholder’s basis in the indebtedness of an S corporation to a shareholder, any net increase (after the application of paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a)) for any subsequent taxable year shall be applied to restore such reduction in basis before any of it may be used to increase the shareholder’s basis in the stock of the S corporation.

(3)Coordination with sections 165(g) and 166(d)

This section and section 1366 shall be applied before the application of sections 165(g) and 166(d) to any taxable year of the shareholder or the corporation in which the security or debt becomes worthless.

(4)Adjustments in case of inherited stock
(A)In general

If any person acquires stock in an S corporation by reason of the death of a decedent or by bequest, devise, or inheritance, section 691 shall be applied with respect to any item of income of the S corporation in the same manner as if the decedent had held directly his pro rata share of such item.

(B)Adjustments to basis

The basis determined under section 1014 of any stock in an S corporation shall be reduced by the portion of the value of the stock which is attributable to items constituting income in respect of the decedent.

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-0 Table of contents
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-0(a) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-0(b) Reduction in basis of indebtedness.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-0(c) Restoration of basis.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-0(d) Time at which adjustments to basis of indebtedness are effective.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-0(e) Examples.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-0(f) Ordering rules for taxable years beginning on or after August 18, 1998.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-0(g) Elective ordering rule.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-0(h) Examples.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-0(i) §1.1367-0(i)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-0(j) Adjustments for items of income in respect of a decedent.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-1 Adjustments to basis of shareholder's stock in an S corporation
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-1(a) In general—(1) Adjustments under section 1367.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-1(b) Increase in basis of stock—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-1(c) Decrease in basis of stock—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-1(d) Time at which adjustments to basis of stock are effective—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-1(e) Ordering rules for taxable years beginning before January 1, 1997.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-1(f) Ordering rules for taxable years beginning on or after August 18, 1998.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-1(g) Elective ordering rule.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-1(h) Examples.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-1(i) §1.1367-1(i)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-1(j) Adjustments for items of income in respect of a decedent.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-2 Adjustments to basis of indebtedness to shareholder
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-2(a) In general—(1) Adjustments under section 1367.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1367-2(b) Reduction in basis of indebtedness—(1) General rule.

75 Citing Cases

FOLLOWED Mohamad Nasser Aboui & Mahyar Mizani, Petitioners T.C. Memo. 2024-106 · 2024

Section 1367 provides basis adjustment rules applicable to stock in S corporations.

Section 1367 provides that basis in S corporation stock is increased by income passed through to the shareholder under section 1366(a)(1) and decreased by, inter alia, distributions not includable in the shareholder's income pursuant to section 1368.

Section 1367 provides that basis in S corporation stock is increased by income passed through to the shareholderunder section 1366(a)(1), and decreased by, inter alia, distributions not includable in the shareholder's income pursuantto section 1368.

FOLLOWED John Welch, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-179 · 2012

1366(d)(1)." Section 1367 provides that a shareholder's basis is increased for items ofincome passed through to the shareholder under section 1366(a)(1) and decreased (but not below zero) by losses and deductions passed through to the shareholder under section 1366(a)(2).

Section 1367 provides that basis in S corporation stock is.increased by income passed through to the shareholder under section 1366(a) (1), and decreased by, inter alia, - 11 - distributions not includable in the shareholder' s income pursuant to section 1368 .

FOLLOWED Samuel H. Smith, Jr. & Amy L. Smith, Petitioners T.C. Memo. 2010-115 · 2010

Section 1367 provides that basis in S corporation stock is increased by income passed through to the shareholder under section 1366(a)(1), and decreased by, inter alia, distributions not includable in the shareholder's income pursuant to section 1368 .

Yolanda Welch, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-179 · 2012

1366(d)(1)." Section 1367 provides that a shareholder's basis is increased for items ofincome passed through to the shareholder under section 1366(a)(1) and decreased (but not below zero) by losses and deductions passed through to the shareholder under section 1366(a)(2).

Mark & Barbara Curcio, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2010-115 · 2010

Section 1367 provides that basis in S corporation stock is increased by income passed through to the shareholder under section 1366(a)(1), and decreased by, inter alia, distributions not includable in the shareholder's income pursuant to section 1368 . Section 1368(b) provides that distributions from an S .corporation with no accumulated earnings a

r decision is whether discharge of - 2 - indebtedness income excluded from an S corporation’s gross income under section 108(a) passes through to the S corporation’s shareholders and, if it does, increases the basis of the shareholder’s stock under section 1367. We addressed this issue in Nelson v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. 114 (1998), affd. 182 F.3d 1152 (10th Cir. 1999), wherein we held that cancellation of debt (COD) income excluded by section 108(a) does not pass through to a shareholder of an

Daniel J. Culnen, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2000-139 · 2000

Section 1367 provides additional, special rules with respect to adjusting basis in an S corporation investment. The disagreement between the parties concerns only petitioner's cost basis in his Wedgewood investment. The parties disagree as to whether petitioner's cost basis in his Wedgewood investment includes the various payments represented by th

William C. & Gene E. Witzel, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-64 · 1999

ns,1 the sole issue for decision is whether discharge of indebtedness (COD) income excluded under section 108(a) from the gross income of an S corporation passes through to the shareholder of the S corporation as an item of income under section 1366(a)(1)(A) and consequently increases the basis of the shareholder's stock in the S corporation under section 1367.2 The parties submitted this case fully stipulated.

1.1367-1(e), Income Tax Regs. Respondent erroneously flip-flopped steps (2) and (3) by decreasing the adjusted bases by the amounts of the shareholders' distributions before decreasing the adjusted bases by the amounts of the shareholders' pro rata shares of losses and deductions.4 We hold that the amounts of Michael's, Jody's, and

Mel T. Nelson, Petitioner 110 T.C. No. 12 · 1998

Held: In deciding whether petitioner may increase his basis in the corporate stock, sec. 108(d)(7)(A), I.R.C., applies. 2. Held, further, sec. 108(d)(7)(A), I.R.C., precludes the application of the conduit rules of subchapter S. 3. Held, further, petitioner may not increase his basis in M stock to reflect discharge of indebtedness income realized by M. Neil M. Goff, for petitioner. Virginia L. Hamilton, for respondent. HAMBLEN, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency of $69,381 in petitioner's

Accordingly, the shareholders' stock basis under Section 1367 is not increased.

Nelson v. Commissioner 110 T.C. 114 · 1998

me realized and excluded from gross income under section 108(a) passes through to shareholders of a subchapter S corporation as an item of income in accordance with section 1366(a)(1)(A) and, in turn, increases the basis of the corporate stock under section 1367. FINDINGS OF FACT This case was submitted fully stipulated pursuant to Rule 122. The stipulation of facts is incorporated herein and found accordingly. Petitioner, Mel T. Nelson, resided in Denver, Colorado, at the time he filed the peti

Carl E. & Elaine Y. Jones, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-400 · 1997

(1), S corporations generally do not produce any current earnings and profits, sec. 1371(c)(1). Furthermore, sec. 1366 provides, in general, that the gross income of an S corporation is included pro rata in the gross income of its shareholders, and sec. 1367 provides the general rule that the basis of each shareholder's stock is increased by the items of S corporation income included in the shareholder's income. Since an S corporation's income is allocated to its shareholders when realized by th

Section 1367 then specifies adjustments to basis applicable to investments in S corporations. Basis in S corporation stock is increased by income passed through to the shareholder under section 1366(a)(1) and decreased by, inter alia, distributions not includable in the shareholder’s income pursuant to section 1368; items of loss and deduction pass

(besides adjustments to basis required by section 1367, other adjustments to basis ofstock are determined under other applicable provisions ofthe Internal Revenue Code).3 The adjusted basis of 3Sec.

ined under section 1012, adjusted as determined under section 1016. Sec. 1011. Under section 1012, basis is generally the property's cost. In the case ofstock in an S corporation, - 10 - [*10] adjustments to basis include adjustments required under section 1367.1° Sec. 1016(a)(17). On briefthe parties focus on Mr. Moore's basis in his ATS stock without regard to adjustments required under section 1367, which they suggest they will be able to calculate as part ofthe Rule 155 computations. Consequ

Marc & Pamela Maguire, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-160 · 2012

1368(a) provides that a "distribution ofproperty made by an S corporation with respect to its stockto which (but for this subsection) section 301(c) would apply shall be treated in the manner provided in subsection (b) or (c), whichever applies." Sec.

Generally, under section 1367 a shareholder's tax basis in the stock in, and in the loans to, an S corporation are adjusted to reflect the shareholder's share ofincome, losses, deductions, and credits -92- ofthe S corporation as calculated under section 1366(a)(1).

Generally, under section 1367 a shareholder’s tax basis in the stock in, and in the loans to, an S corporation are adjusted to reflect the shareholder’s share of income, losses, deductions, and credits of the S corporation as calculated under section 1366(a)(1).

Ira & Tracy Nathel, Petitioner 131 T.C. No. 17 · 2008

ust 30 , 2001, capital contributions to G&D and to W&N CAL were treated by petitioners as constituting income under section 1366 (a)(1) to G&D and W&N CAL (albeit as excludable income under section 118) and therefore as restoring or increasing under section 1367 (b)(2)(B) petitioners' respective tax bases in the outstanding loans each petitioner made to G&D and W&N CAL as follows : Each Petitioner's Tax Bases in Loans To G&D and W&N CAL Increased Loans To From To G&D $112,546 $649,775 W&N CAL 3,

Sheldon & Ann M. Nathel, Petitioner 131 T.C. No. 17 · 2008

ust 30 , 2001, capital contributions to G&D and to W&N CAL were treated by petitioners as constituting income under section 1366 (a)(1) to G&D and W&N CAL (albeit as excludable income under section 118) and therefore as restoring or increasing under section 1367 (b)(2)(B) petitioners' respective tax bases in the outstanding loans each petitioner made to G&D and W&N CAL as follows : Each Petitioner's Tax Bases in Loans To G&D and W&N CAL Increased Loans To From To G&D $112,546 $649,775 W&N CAL 3,

Mark N. & Erica Y. Wright, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2007-50 · 2007

Section 1367 specifies adjustments to basis applicable to investments in S corporations . Basis in S corporation stock is increased by income passed through to the shareholder under section 1366(a)(1) and decreased by, inter alia, distributions not includable in the shareholder's income pursuant to section 1368 ; items of loss and deduction passed

Thomas & Janice Gleason, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2006-191 · 2006

Section 1367 then specifies adjustments to basis applicable to investments in S corporations. Basis in S corporation stock is increased by income passed through to the shareholder under section 1366(a)(1) and decreased by, inter alia, distributions not includable in the shareholder’s income pursuant to section 1368; items of loss and deduction pass

A shareholder’s adjusted basis in his or her S corporation stock is determined under section 1367, which provides a list of the positive and negative adjustments to the shareholder’s basis in his or her stock for items of income, loss, and deductions of an - 10 - S corporation during the year.

a shareholder cannot, however, exceed the amount of the adjusted bases in the shareholder's stock and in any indebtedness of the corporation to the shareholder. See sec. 1366(d)(1). A taxpayer's adjusted bases in stock and debt are determined under section 1367. Relevant here, section 1367(a)(2)(B) provides that a taxpayer's basis in stock shall be reduced by 2 This amount, $5,103, consisted of $2,955 from petitioner's 1992 wage withholdings and the amount of overpayment claimed by petitioners

James L. & Leta A. Thurman, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1998-233 · 1998

petitioners. Petitioners argue that no election was made by EMFI. Generally, the "accumulated adjustments account" is a corporate account of an S corporation which is adjusted in the same manner as adjustments are made to a shareholder's basis under section 1367. Sec. 1368(e)(1)(A). The accumulated adjustments account generally contains a total of all undistributed earnings of the corporation previously taxed to the shareholders during the period in which the corporation has been an S corporatio

Williams v. Commissioner 110 T.C. 27 · 1998

— Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term “accumulated adjustments account” means an account of the S corporation which is adjusted for the S period in a manner similar to the adjustments under section 1367 (except that no adjustment shall be made for income (and related expenses) which is exempt from tax under this title and the phrase “(but not below zero)” shall be disregarded in section 1367(b)(2)(A)) and no adjustment shall be made for Federal taxes attributable to any taxable year

Paul G. Gubbini, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-221 · 1996

The basis- adjustment rules of section 1367 are applied before application of sections 165(g) and 166(d) in a taxable year of the shareholder in which a security or debt becomes worthless.

Gary Vander Boegh v. EnergySolutions, Inc. 772 F.3d 1056 · Cir.
Combs v. Homer Ctr Sch Dist · Cir.
Combs v. Homer Ctr Sch Dist · Cir.
Jesus Cuellar-Aguilar v. Deggeller Attractions, Inc. 812 F.3d 614 · Cir.
Steven Menzies v. Seyfarth Shaw LLP · Cir.
Steven Menzies v. Seyfarth Shaw LLP 943 F.3d 328 · Cir.
David B. Shaev v. Lawrence Saper Alan B. Abramson David Altschiller Joseph Grayzel, M.D. George Heller Arno Nash Datascope Corp 320 F.3d 373 · Cir.
Smith v. North American Specialty Ins. 342 F. App'x 841 · Cir.
Smith v. North American Specialty Ins. 342 F. App'x 841 · Cir.
Gaudiano v. CIR · Cir.
United States v. Ernst Jacob GmbH & Co. KG · Cir.
Eastman v. Marine Mechanical · Cir.
Rocco v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund 281 F.3d 62 · Cir.
Coghlan v. Wellcraft Marine Corp. 240 F.3d 449 · Cir.
John Keith Blakely and John Emmett Long v. United States of America 276 F.3d 853 · Cir.
Thomas Rocco v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension And Retirement Fund 281 F.3d 62 · Cir.
Ernst v. Roberts 379 F.3d 373 · Cir.
John T. Eastman v. Marine Mechanical Corporation 438 F.3d 544 · Cir.
Marc S. & Anne M. Barnes, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-80 · 2012
Barrington Cove Ltd. Partnership v. Rhode Island Housing & Mortgage Finance Corp. 246 F.3d 1 · Cir.
R Ball for R Ball III by Appt v. Commissioner of IRS 742 F.3d 552 · Cir.
United States v. Harold D. Farley Gail D. Farley 202 F.3d 198 · Cir.
Salvador A. Gaudiano,et Al.,petitioners-Appellants v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 216 F.3d 524 · Cir.
Kolari v. New York-Presbyterian Hospital 455 F.3d 118 · Cir.
Kolari v. New York-Presbyterian Hospital 455 F.3d 118 · Cir.
Treasurer of New Jersey v. United States Department of the Treasury 684 F.3d 382 · Cir.
Nathel v. Commissioner 131 T.C. 262 · 2008
Estate of Temple v. Commissioner 65 T.C. 776 · 1976
Merrimac Paper Co. v. Harrison (In Re Merrimac Paper Co.) 420 F.3d 53 · Cir.
Kroshnyi v. U.S. Pack Courier Services, Inc. · Cir.
Charles Emmenegger v. Bull Moose Tube Co. 324 F.3d 616 · Cir.
DiCarlo v. St Mary Hosp · Cir.
Leclerc v. Webb 444 F.3d 428 · Cir.
Willy v. Administrative Review Board 423 F.3d 483 · Cir.
Skyline Wesleyan Church v. Ca Dept of Managed Health Care 968 F.3d 738 · Cir.
Black Bear Sports Group, Inc. v. Amateur Hockey Association of · Cir.
Black Bear Sports Group, Inc. v. Amateur Hockey Association of · Cir.
Skyline Wesleyan Church v. Ca Dept of Managed Health Care · Cir.
William C. Witzel and Gene E. Witzel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 200 F.3d 496 · Cir.
Emmenegger v. Bull Moose Tube Company 324 F.3d 616 · Cir.
Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas Company 364 F.3d 135 · Cir.
Karen Leclerc Guillaume Jarry Beatrice Boulord Maureen D. Affleck, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Daniel E. Webb, Daniel E. Webb Harry J. Phillips, in Their Respective Official Capacities as Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Louisiana Committee on Bar Admissions Jeffery P. Victory Jeannette Theriot Knoll Chet D. Traylor Catherine D. Kimball, A/K/A Kitty Kimball John L. Weimer Bernette Joshua Johnson, in Their Official Capacities as Justices of the Louisiana Supreme Court, Defendants-Appellees-Cross Caroline Wallace Emily Maw v. Pascal F. Calogero Jr., in His Official Capacity as Chief Justice of the Louisiana Supreme Court Jeffrey P. Victory Jeannette Theriot Knoll Chet D. Traylor Catherine D. Kimball John L. Weimer Bernett J. Johnson, in Their Official Capacities as Justices of the Louisiana Supreme Court Daniel E. Webb Harry J. Phillips, Jr., in Their Respective Official Capacities as Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Louisiana Committee on Bar Admissions 419 F.3d 405 · Cir.
Kroshnyi v. U.S. Pack Courier Services, Inc. 771 F.3d 93 · Cir.