§1447

33 cases·20 questioned·3 overruled·10 cited

Statute text not available for this section.

33 Citing Cases

§ 1447(c)).11 On the basis of the record before us, we find it is premature to award costs and fees to petitioner since no evidence of the excess costs and fees incurred has been submitted; rather, we find it is appropriate for us to make such a determination in the future. We will grant, in part, petitioner’s Motion to Impose Sanctions under secti

1532, 1537 (2021) (“Whether we look to the time of § 1447(d)’s adoption or amendment, a judicial ‘order’ meant then what it means today .

Jerry & Patricia A. Dixon, Petitioner 132 T.C. No. 5 · 2009

resist removal . As we said above, and repeat here, unreasonably high fees are not "incurred" as a result of removal; rather, excessive fee requests flow from, and accumulate by means of, improper billing practices, and will not be recoverable under § 1447(c) . [ Id. at 1135 .1 52 - method is the proper starting point for computing reasonable attorneys' fees under section 6673(a)(2) . Government Incurs the Excess Costs, Expenses, and Attorneys' Fees Attributable to Government Attorney's Miscondu

State of Wisconsin v. Hotline Industries · Cir.
State of Wisconsin v. Hotline Industries, Inc. 236 F.3d 363 · Cir.
United States v. Schiaffino 275 F. App'x 115 · Cir.
Raizel Blumberger v. Ian Tilley 115 F. 4th 1113 · Cir.
Orange County Water District v. Unocal Corp. 584 F.3d 43 · Cir.
In Re: Orange County Water District · Cir.
Grable & Sons Metal v. Darue Engineering · Cir.
L. Claire Lander, Charles M. Droz, Julian Block, and Zelda Block v. Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance Company and Hartford Life Insurance Company 251 F.3d 101 · Cir.
In Re: Cody, Inc., Debtor. Cody, Inc., Debtor-Appellant v. County of Orange and Town of Woodbury 338 F.3d 89 · Cir.
Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Manufacturing 377 F.3d 592 · Cir.
Plazzi v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. 52 F.4th 1 · Cir.
Sylvia Vergara v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Ricardo Toledo v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Peter Straus v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Mirna Rodriguez v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Michael Zeifert v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Lorena Rebollar Sedano v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Lauren Bennett v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Keely Roberts v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. 98 F.4th 810 · Cir.
Joshua Chupack v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Elizabeth Turnipseed v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Bruce Sundheim v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Amelia Tenorio v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. · Cir.
Dixon v. Commissioner 132 T.C. 55 · 2009
Angerhofer v. Commissioner 87 T.C. 814 · 1986
Willits v. Commissioner 50 T.C. 602 · 1968
Mazen Shweika v. Dep't of Homeland Security 723 F.3d 710 · Cir.
Zimmerman v. Cambridge Credit Counseling Corp. 409 F.3d 473 · Cir.
United States v. Dedman · Cir.
Andrew Zimmerman v. Cambridge Credit Counseling Corp. 409 F.3d 473 · Cir.