§1503 — Computation and payment of tax

61 cases·16 followed·5 distinguished·2 questioned·3 criticized·1 limited·5 overruled·29 cited26% support

(a)[General rule] 11 Subsec. (a) heading editorially supplied.

In any case in which a consolidated return is made or is required to be made, the tax shall be determined, computed, assessed, collected, and adjusted in accordance with the regulations under section 1502 prescribed before the last day prescribed by law for the filing of such return.

(b)Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title X, § 1052(c)(5), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1648]
(c)Special rule for application of certain losses against income of insurance companies taxed under section 801
(1)In general

If an election under section 1504(c)(2) is in effect for the taxable year and the consolidated taxable income of the members of the group not taxed under section 801 results in a consolidated net operating loss for such taxable year, then under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the amount of such loss which cannot be absorbed in the applicable carry-back periods against the taxable income of such members not taxed under section 801 shall be taken into account in determining the consolidated taxable income of the affiliated group for such taxable year to the extent of 35 percent of such loss or 35 percent of the taxable income of the members taxed under section 801, whichever is less. The unused portion of such loss shall be available as a carryover, subject to the same limitations (applicable to the sum of the loss for the carryover year and the loss (or losses) carried over to such year), in applicable carryover years.

(2)Losses of recent nonlife affiliates

Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1), a net operating loss for a taxable year of a member of the group not taxed under section 801 shall not be taken into account in determining the taxable income of a member taxed under section 801 (either for the taxable year or as a carryover or carryback) if such taxable year precedes the sixth taxable year such members have been members of the same affiliated group (determined without regard to section 1504(b)(2)).

(d)Dual consolidated loss
(1)In general

The dual consolidated loss for any taxable year of any corporation shall not be allowed to reduce the taxable income of any other member of the affiliated group for the taxable year or any other taxable year.

(2)Dual consolidated loss

For purposes of this section—

(A)In general

Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term “dual consolidated loss” means any net operating loss of a domestic corporation which is subject to an income tax of a foreign country on its income without regard to whether such income is from sources in or outside of such foreign country, or is subject to such a tax on a residence basis.

(B)Special rule where loss not used under foreign law

To the extent provided in regulations, the term “dual consolidated loss” shall not include any loss which, under the foreign income tax law, does not offset the income of any foreign corporation.

(3)Treatment of losses of separate business units

To the extent provided in regulations, any loss of a separate unit of a domestic corporation shall be subject to the limitations of this subsection in the same manner as if such unit were a wholly owned subsidiary of such corporation.

(4)Income on assets acquired after the loss

The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to prevent the avoidance of the purposes of this subsection by contributing assets to the corporation with the dual consolidated loss after such loss was sustained.

(e)Special rule for determining adjustments to basis
(1)In general

Solely for purposes of determining gain or loss on the disposition of intragroup stock and the amount of any inclusion by reason of an excess loss account, in determining the adjustments to the basis of such intragroup stock on account of the earnings and profits of any member of an affiliated group for any consolidated year (and in determining the amount in such account)—

(A)

such earnings and profits shall be determined as if section 312 were applied for such taxable year (and all preceding consolidated years of the member with respect to such group) without regard to subsections (k) and (n) thereof, and

(B)

earnings and profits shall not include any amount excluded from gross income under section 108 to the extent the amount so excluded was not applied to reduce tax attributes (other than basis in property).

(2)Definitions

For purposes of this subsection—

(A)Intragroup stock

The term “intragroup stock” means any stock which—

(i)

is in a corporation which is or was a member of an affiliated group of corporations, and

(ii)

is held by another corporation which is or was a member of such group.

Such term includes any other property the basis of which is determined (in whole or in part) by reference to the basis of stock described in the preceding sentence.

(B)Consolidated year

The term “consolidated year” means any taxable year for which the affiliated group makes a consolidated return.

(C)Application of section 312(n)(7) not affected

The reference in paragraph (1) to subsection (n) of section 312 shall be treated as not including a reference to paragraph (7) of such subsection.

(3)Adjustments

Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, proper adjustments shall be made in the application of paragraph (1)—

(A)

in the case of any property acquired by the corporation before consolidation, for the difference between the adjusted basis of such property for purposes of computing taxable income and its adjusted basis for purposes of computing earnings and profits, and

(B)

in the case of any property, for any basis adjustment under section 50(c).

(4)Elimination of election to reduce basis of indebtedness

Nothing in the regulations prescribed under section 1502 shall permit any reduction in the amount otherwise included in gross income by reason of an excess loss account if such reduction is on account of a reduction in the basis of indebtedness.

(f)Limitation on use of group losses to offset income of subsidiary paying preferred dividends
(1)In general

In the case of any subsidiary distributing during any taxable year dividends on any applicable preferred stock—

(A)

no group loss item shall be allowed to reduce the disqualified separately computed income of such subsidiary for such taxable year, and

(B)

no group credit item shall be allowed against the tax imposed by this chapter on such disqualified separately computed income.

(2)Group items

For purposes of this subsection—

(A)Group loss item

The term “group loss item” means any of the following items of any other member of the affiliated group which includes the subsidiary:

(i)

Any net operating loss and any net operating loss carryover or carryback under section 172.

(ii)

Any loss from the sale or exchange of any capital asset and any capital loss carryover or carryback under section 1212.

(B)Group credit item

The term “group credit item” means any credit allowable under part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 (other than section 34) to any other member of the affiliated group which includes the subsidiary and any carryover or carryback of any such credit.

(3)Other definitions

For purposes of this subsection—

(A)Disqualified separately computed income

The term “disqualified separately computed income” means the portion of the separately computed taxable income of the subsidiary which does not exceed the dividends distributed by the subsidiary during the taxable year on applicable preferred stock.

(B)Separately computed taxable income

The term “separately computed taxable income” means the separate taxable income of the subsidiary for the taxable year determined—

(i)

by taking into account gains and losses from the sale or exchange of a capital asset and section 1231 gains and losses,

(ii)

without regard to any net operating loss or capital loss carryover or carryback, and

(iii)

with such adjustments as the Secretary may prescribe.

(C)Subsidiary

The term “subsidiary” means any corporation which is a member of an affiliated group filing a consolidated return other than the common parent.

(D)Applicable preferred stock

The term “applicable preferred stock” means stock described in section 1504(a)(4) in the subsidiary which is—

(i)

issued after

November 17, 1989

, and

(ii)

held by a person other than a member of the same affiliated group as the subsidiary.

(4)Regulations

The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this subsection, including regulations—

(A)

to prevent the avoidance of this subsection through the transfer of built-in losses to the subsidiary,

(B)

to provide rules for cases in which the subsidiary owns (directly or indirectly) stock in another member of the affiliated group, and

(C)

to provide for the application of this subsection where dividends are not paid currently, where the redemption and liquidation rights of the applicable preferred stock exceed the issue price for such stock, or where the stock is otherwise structured to avoid the purposes of this subsection.

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1503-1 Computation and payment of tax
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1503-1(a) General rule.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.1503-1(b) Limitation.

61 Citing Cases

We disagree with each of petitioners’ arguments.

We hold that a life-nonlife consolidated group must calculate its ACE adjustment on a consolidated basis ; and (2) when a life-nonlife consolidated group calculates it s ACE adjustment, whether application of the loss limitation rules of section 1503(c) and section 1 .1502-47, Income Tax Regs .

Accordingly, we hold that, in the context of a life-nonlife consolidated return, the AMT book income adjustment is to be made using a consolidated approach, with a single adjustment for the entire group.

parate Entity Method 1982 ($ 34,888,309) ($10,225,979) 1983 ( 28,810,677) ( 8,351,216) 1984 ( 116,008,516) ( 26,734,260) 1985 ( 96,060,581) ( 94,424,416) * These figures reflect CNOL’s after application of certain percentage limitations contained in sec. 1503. Discussion Summary judgment may be granted if the pleadings and other materials demonstrate that no genuine issue exists as to any of the material facts and that a decision may be rendered as a matter of law. Rule 121(b); Colestock v. Comm

The legislative history accompanying the 1986 revisions of the AMT supports petitioner’s argument: It is clarified that, in light of the parallel nature of the regular tax and minimum tax systems, any limitations applying for regular tax purposes to the use by a consolidated group of NOLs or current year losses (e.g., section 1503) apply for minimum tax purposes as well.

Section 1503 then addresses the computation and payment of tax for purposes of such returns, providing in relevant part as follows: SEC. 1503. COMPUTATION AND PAYMENT OF TAX. (a) General Rule. — In any case in which a consolidated return is made or is required to be made, the tax shall be determined, computed, assessed, collected, and adjusted in a

IV 2017). 80 Division by the relevant agency;49 that after filing, a copy of each document had to be made immediately available for public inspection at the Federal Register Division; and that once filed with the Federal Register Division each document had to be immediately transmitted by the Federal Register Division to the Gover

Amantha S. Allen, Petitioner 118 T.C. No. 1 · 2002

The conferees stated in its discussion of corporate AMT NOLs: It is clarified that, in light of the parallel nature of the regular tax and minimum tax systems, any limitations applying for regular tax purposes to the use by a consolidated group of NOLs or current year losses (e.g., section 1503) apply for minimum tax purposes as well.

The conferees stated in its discussion of corporate AMT NOLs: It is clarified that, in light of the parallel nature of the regular tax and minimum tax systems, any limitations applying for regular tax purposes to the use by a consolidated group of NOLs or current year losses (e.g., section 1503) apply for minimum tax purposes as well.

The conferees stated in its discussion of corporate AMT NOLs: It is clarified that, in light of the parallel nature of the regular tax and minimum tax systems, any limitations applying for regular tax purposes to the use by a consolidated group of NOLs or current year losses (e.g., section 1503) apply for minimum tax purposes as well.

John R. & Judith M. Allen, Petitioner 118 T.C. No. 1 · 2002

The conferees stated in its discussion of corporate AMT NOLs: It is clarified that, in light of the parallel nature of the regular tax and minimum tax systems, any limitations applying for regular tax purposes to the use by a consolidated group of NOLs or current year losses (e.g., section 1503) apply for minimum tax purposes as well.

Warren L. Allen, Petitioner 118 T.C. No. 1 · 2002

The conferees stated in its discussion of corporate AMT NOLs: It is clarified that, in light of the parallel nature of the regular tax and minimum tax systems, any limitations applying for regular tax purposes to the use by a consolidated group of NOLs or current year losses (e.g., section 1503) apply for minimum tax purposes as well.

Compact Equipment Company, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-409 · 1999

1503, 100 Stat. 2085, 2742. Congress consolidated the fraud additions to tax, formerly under section 6653(b)(1) and (2), into section 6653(b)(1). Through amended section 6653(b)(1), Congress provided that only the portion of the underpayment attributable to fraud would be subject to the fraud additions to tax: SEC. 6653(b) Fraud.-- (1) In Gene

Robert E. Iles & Monica M. Iles, Petitioners T.C. Memo. 1998-337 · 1998

640, 642 (1983). For this purpose, respondent need not prove the precise amount of the underpayment resulting from fraud, but only that there is some underpayment and that some part of it is 24(...continued) The later amendments of this provision by sec. 1503 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085, 2742), by sec. 1015(b)(2)(B) of the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-647, 102 Stat. 3342, 3569), and by sec. 7721(a) of the Omnibus Budget Reconcilia

747 Kenmore Ave., Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-276 · 1997

axes the payment of which (determined without regard to any extension) is due after Sept. 3, 1982. In the instant case, par. (2) is applicable to the additions to tax determined against petitioners for 1982. The later amendments of this provision by sec. 1503 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA 86--Pub. L. 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085, 2742), by sec. 1015(b)(2)(B) of the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-647, 102 Stat. 3342, 3569), and by sec. 7721(a) of the Omnibus Budget Re

Robert D. Grossman, Jr., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-452 · 1996

g on the last day prescribed by law for payment of such underpayment (determined without regard to any extension) and ending on the date of the assessment of the tax (or, if earlier, the date of the payment of the tax). This provision was amended by sec. 1503 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA 86), Pub. L. 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085, 2742. See infra note 35. - 143 - section 6601 and applies only to the portion of the underpayment that is attributable to fraud. Respondent has the burden of proving, b

Sarabia v. Noem · Cir.
United States v. James Thomas McBride 362 F.3d 360 · Cir.
United States v. Thomas Edward Uzenski 434 F.3d 690 · Cir.
United States v. Barry Sussman 709 F.3d 155 · Cir.
USA V. FOREST KIRST · Cir.
United States v. Sullivan · Cir.
Denis v. Attorney General of the United States 633 F.3d 201 · Cir.
United States v. Moyer 674 F.3d 192 · Cir.
United States v. Glorious Shavers 693 F.3d 363 · Cir.
United States v. O'Georgia 569 F.3d 281 · Cir.
United States v. O'Georgia · Cir.
Agustin Valenzuela Gallardo v. William Barr 968 F.3d 1053 · Cir.
United States v. Bogart 576 F.3d 565 · Cir.
United States v. Uzenski · Cir.
United States v. Bogart · Cir.
United States v. H. G. Frost, Jr. · Cir.
United States v. Marinello · Cir.
United States v. Tamny Westbrooks 858 F.3d 317 · Cir.
George Nichols, Iii, in His Capacity as Liquidator of Kentucky Central Life Insurance Company v. United States 260 F.3d 637 · Cir.
United States v. H.G. Frost, Jr., Also Known as Jack Frost 321 F.3d 738 · Cir.
United States v. Marinello 839 F.3d 209 · Cir.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Commissioner 105 F. App'x 67 · Cir.
Allen v. Commissioner 118 T.C. 1 · 2002
Burrill v. Commissioner 93 T.C. 643 · 1989
Cromwell Corp. v. Commissioner 43 T.C. 313 · 1964
United States v. Sullivan 131 F.4th 776 · Cir.
United States v. Yusuf 536 F.3d 178 · Cir.
United States v. Flemmi 402 F.3d 79 · Cir.
United States v. David Miner 774 F.3d 336 · Cir.
United States v. Sorensen 801 F.3d 1217 · Cir.
United States v. McBride · Cir.
United States v. McBride · Cir.
United States v. Yusuf 49 V.I. 1182 · Cir.
United States v. Marinello 855 F.3d 455 · Cir.
United States v. Abraham Fisch 851 F.3d 402 · Cir.
United States v. Steve Hale 857 F.3d 158 · Cir.
United States v. Patrick Sutherland 921 F.3d 421 · Cir.
Nadine Pellegrino v. TSA 937 F.3d 164 · Cir.
Silva v. Garland 27 F.4th 95 · Cir.
United States v. James Thomas McBride 434 F.3d 470 · Cir.
United States v. Tiran Casteel 717 F.3d 635 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.