§1651

Lakewood Associates; Robert G. Moore, Tax Matters Partner, Petitioners 109 T.C. No. 21 · 1997

The issue for our consideration is whether Lakewood Associates is entitled to a loss deduction under section 1651 in 1989 for a decrease in the value of real property alleged to have been caused by restrictions imposed on its ability to develop the property by Federal wetland regulations that were issued in that year.2 FINDINGS OF FACT3 Lakewood Associates (Lakewood) is a Virginia general partnership with its principal place of business in Virgini

United States v. Wells · Cir.

Shapiro v. Commissioner 73 T.C. 313 · 1979

Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam v. 812 F.3d 290 · Cir.

United States v. Farnsworth · Cir.

Keith Baranski v. United States 880 F.3d 951 · Cir.

United States v. Arthur L. Farnsworth 456 F.3d 394 · Cir.

United States v. Patrick Sutherland · Cir.

Sullivan v. Feldman 132 F.4th 315 · Cir.

Alfredo Semper v. Curtis Gomez 60 V.I. 971 · Cir.

Netsphere, Inc. v. Baron 703 F.3d 296 · Cir.

Netsphere, Incorporated v. Jeffrey Baron · Cir.

Netsphere, Inc. v. Jeffrey Baron · Cir.

Netsphere Incorporated v. Jeffrey Baron, et · Cir.

In Re McGraw-hill Global Educ. Holdings LLC 909 F.3d 48 · Cir.

United States v. Yielding 657 F.3d 722 · Cir.

Birdman v. Office of the Governor 677 F.3d 167 · Cir.

United States v. Tomo Razmilovic, David E. Nachman, Kenneth Jaeggi, Movant-Appellant 419 F.3d 134 · Cir.

United States v. Zaleski 686 F.3d 90 · Cir.

United States v. Patrick Sutherland 103 F.4th 200 · Cir.

28 Citing Cases

New cases, delivered.