§1654

5 cases·5 cited

Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §1654

Statute text not available for this section.

5 Citing Cases

Everett Associates, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-143 · 2012

Consequently, even if ambiguity exists within the document, we interpret it againstpetitioner-drafter. See id. "Bankruptcy Code sec. 1129(a)(9)(C) provides in relevant part: (continued...) that, absent agreement otherwise, ifthe plan provides for deferred payments to a government creditor holding a priority tax claim, the plan must als

Larick A. Hill and Fawni Little, a.k.a. Fawni Hill, Petitioners T.C. Memo. 1996-179 · 1996

ding whether he and petitioner intended the payments at issue to be child support. Petitioners contend the stipulation re modification of judgment of dissolution must be construed against James Little because his advisers drafted it. Cal. Civil Code sec. 1654 (West 1985); 2 Restatement, Contracts 2d, sec. 206 (1981); 4 Williston, A Treatise on the Law of Contracts, sec. 621 (3d ed. 1961). We disagree. An agreement is construed against its - 20 - drafters only to resolve ambiguities in the agreem

United States v. Jones · Cir.

Monahan v. New York City Department of Corrections 214 F.3d 275 · Cir.

United States v. Climmie Jones, Jr. 489 F.3d 243 · Cir.