§1710

6 cases·6 cited

Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §1710

Statute text not available for this section.

6 Citing Cases

George C. Huff, Petitioner and The Government of the United States Virgin Islands, Intervenor, Petitioners 135 T.C. No. 30 · 2010

-(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure cannot expand our jurisdiction see,.e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 82 ("These rules do not extend or limit the jurisdiction of the district courts or the venue of actions in those courts."T; 7 Wright et al., supra sec. 1710. As we noted in Estate of Forgey v. Commissioner, 115 -T.C. 142, 146 (2000), we have jurisdiction to redeteráine deficiencies in Federal income, estate, gift, and certain excise taxes. See secs. 6211-6215; Rule 13. We also have jurisdiction

Huff v. Commissioner 135 T.C. 605 · 2010

(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure cannot expand our jurisdiction, see, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 82 (“These rules do not extend or limit the jurisdiction of the district courts or the venue of actions in those courts.”); 7 Wright et al., supra sec. 1710. As we noted in Estate of Forgey v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 142, 146 (2000), we have jurisdiction to redetermine deficiencies in Federal income, estate, gift, and certain excise taxes. See secs. 6211-6215; Rule 13. We also have jurisdiction

Miners National Bank v. Commissioner 33 T.C. 42 · 1959

Stoeckel v. Commissioner 2 T.C. 975 · 1943

SC State Ports v. FMC · Cir.

South Carolina State Ports Authority v. Federal Maritime Commission 243 F.3d 165 · Cir.

§1710

6 Citing Cases

New cases, delivered.