§175 — Soil and water conservation expenditures; endangered species recovery expenditures

28 cases·2 followed·3 distinguished·1 questioned·1 criticized·21 cited7% support

(a)In general

A taxpayer engaged in the business of farming may treat expenditures which are paid or incurred by him during the taxable year for the purpose of soil or water conservation in respect of land used in farming, or for the prevention of erosion of land used in farming, or for endangered species recovery, as expenses which are not chargeable to capital account. The expenditures so treated shall be allowed as a deduction.

(b)Limitation

The amount deductible under subsection (a) for any taxable year shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross income derived from farming during the taxable year. If for any taxable year the total of the expenditures treated as expenses which are not chargeable to capital account exceeds 25 percent of the gross income derived from farming during the taxable year, such excess shall be deductible for succeeding taxable years in order of time; but the amount deductible under this section for any one such succeeding taxable year (including the expenditures actually paid or incurred during the taxable year) shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross income derived from farming during the taxable year.

(c)Definitions

For purposes of subsection (a)—

(1)

The term “expenditures which are paid or incurred by him during the taxable year for the purpose of soil or water conservation in respect of land used in farming, or for the prevention of erosion of land used in farming, or for endangered species recovery” means expenditures paid or incurred for the treatment or moving of earth, including (but not limited to) leveling, grading and terracing, contour furrowing, the construction, control, and protection of diversion channels, drainage ditches, earthen dams, watercourses, outlets, and ponds, the eradication of brush, and the planting of windbreaks. Such term shall include expenditures paid or incurred for the purpose of achieving site-specific management actions recommended in recovery plans approved pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Such term does not include—

(A)

the purchase, construction, installation, or improvement of structures, appliances, or facilities which are of a character which is subject to the allowance for depreciation provided in section 167, or

(B)

any amount paid or incurred which is allowable as a deduction without regard to this section.

Notwithstanding the preceding sentences, such term also includes any amount, not otherwise allowable as a deduction, paid or incurred to satisfy any part of an assessment levied by a soil or water conservation or drainage district to defray expenditures made by such district (i) which, if paid or incurred by the taxpayer, would without regard to this sentence constitute expenditures deductible under this section, or (ii) for property of a character subject to the allowance for depreciation provided in section 167 and used in the soil or water conservation or drainage district’s business as such (to the extent that the taxpayer’s share of the assessment levied on the members of the district for such property does not exceed 10 percent of such assessment).

(2)

The term “land used in farming” means land used (before or simultaneously with the expenditures described in paragraph (1)) by the taxpayer or his tenant for the production of crops, fruits, or other agricultural products or for the sustenance of livestock.

(3)Additional limitations.—
(A)Expenditures must be consistent with soil conservation plan or endangered species recovery plan.—

Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, subsection (a) shall not apply to any expenditures unless such expenditures are consistent with—

(i)

the plan (if any) approved by the Soil Conservation Service of the Department of Agriculture or the recovery plan approved pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 for the area in which the land is located, or

(ii)

if there is no plan described in clause (i), any soil conservation plan of a comparable State agency.

(B)Certain wetland, etc., activities not qualified.—

Subsection (a) shall not apply to any expenditures in connection with the draining or filling of wetlands or land preparation for center pivot irrigation systems.

(d)When method may be adopted
(1)Without consent

A taxpayer may, without the consent of the Secretary, adopt the method provided in this section for the taxpayer’s first taxable year for which expenditures described in subsection (a) are paid or incurred.

(2)With consent

A taxpayer may, with the consent of the Secretary, adopt at any time the method provided in this section.

(e)Scope

The method adopted under this section shall apply to all expenditures described in subsection (a). The method adopted shall be adhered to in computing taxable income for the taxable year and for all subsequent taxable years unless, with the approval of the Secretary, a change to a different method is authorized with respect to part or all of such expenditures.

(f)Rules applicable to assessments for depreciable property
(1)Amounts treated as paid or incurred over 9-year period

In the case of an assessment levied to defray expenditures for property described in clause (ii) of the last sentence of subsection (c)(1), if the amount of such assessment paid or incurred by the taxpayer during the taxable year (determined without the application of this paragraph) is in excess of an amount equal to 10 percent of the aggregate amounts which have been and will be assessed as the taxpayer’s share of the expenditures by the district for such property, and if such excess is more than $500, the entire excess shall be treated as paid or incurred ratably over each of the 9 succeeding taxable years.

(2)Disposition of land during 9-year period

If paragraph (1) applies to an assessment and the land with respect to which such assessment was made is sold or otherwise disposed of by the taxpayer (other than by the reason of his death) during the 9 succeeding taxable years, any amount of the excess described in paragraph (1) which has not been treated as paid or incurred for a taxable year ending on or before the sale or other disposition shall be added to the adjusted basis of such land immediately prior to its sale or other disposition and shall not thereafter be treated as paid or incurred ratably under paragraph (1).

(3)Disposition by reason of death

If paragraph (1) applies to an assessment and the taxpayer dies during the 9 succeeding taxable years, any amount of the excess described in paragraph (1) which has not been treated as paid or incurred for a taxable year ending before his death shall be treated as paid or incurred in the taxable year in which he dies.

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-1 Soil and water conservation expenditures; in general
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-2 Definition of soil and water conservation expenditures
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-2(a) Expenditures treated as a deduction.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-2(b) Expenditures not subject to section 175 treatment.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-2(c) Assessments.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-3 Definition of “the business of farming.”
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-4 Definition of “land used in farming.”
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-4(a) Requirements.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-4(b) Examples.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-4(c) Cross reference.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-5 Percentage limitation and carryover
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-5(a) The limitation—(1) General rule.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-5(b) Carryover of expenditures in excess of deduction.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-6 Adoption or change of method
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-6(a) Adoption with consent.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-6(b) Adoption with consent.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-6(c) Change of method.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-6(d) Request for consent to adopt or change method.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-6(e) Scope of method.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-7 Allocation of expenditures in certain circumstances
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-7(a) General rule.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-7(b) Method of allocation.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.175-7(c) Examples.

28 Citing Cases

Held: Sec. 175(c)(3)(A)(i) and (ii), I.R.C., limits the deduction of soil and water conservation expenditures to those that are consistent with a soil conservation plan approved by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) of the Department of Agriculture or a soil conservation plan of a State agency, which agency is comparable to the SCS.

Hugh G. & Norma J. King, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2006-112 · 2006

Whether petitioners may deduct soil or water conservation expenses under section 175.1 We hold that they may not.

175, I.R.C., R allowed the deduction of such expenditures made by one of the partnerships during calendar year 1986, but applying sec. 175(c)(3)(A), I.R.C., denied deductions by both partnerships of such expenditures made after Dec. 31, 1986. The Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 401(a), 100 Stat. 2221, added sec. 175(c)(3)(A) to th

175.24(E) (2017); Unif. Trust Code sec. 702(a) (Unif. Law Comm'n 2016). Since the MTAs are explicitly labeled "trust agreements," we find the requirement ofcollateral to be a neutral factor here. - 57 - • Whether repayments were made: As far as the record reveals, Money- Gram's agents made remittances consistently with their stipulated remitt

175.24(E) (2017); Unif. Trust Code sec. 702(a) (Unif. Law Comm'n 2016). Since the MTAs are explicitly labeled "trust agreements," we find the requirement ofcollateral to be a neutral factor here. - 57 - • Whether repayments were made: As far as the record reveals, Money- Gram's agents made remittances consistently with their stipulated remitt

Ward AG Products, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1998-84 · 1998

For the purpose of section 175, a taxpayer who receives a rental (either in cash or in kind) which is based upon farm production is engaged in the business of farming.

Amfac, Inc. v. Commissioner 70 T.C. 305 · 1978
Hunter v. Commissioner 46 T.C. 477 · 1966
Tatum v. Commissioner 46 T.C. 736 · 1966
Gates Rubber Co. v. Commissioner 74 T.C. 1456 · 1980
Sun Co. v. Commissioner 74 T.C. 1481 · 1980
Standard Oil Co. v. Commissioner 68 T.C. 325 · 1977
Kimes v. Commissioner 55 T.C. 774 · 1971
Coffin v. Commissioner 41 T.C. 83 · 1963
Behring v. Commissioner 32 T.C. 1256 · 1959
Robert Dollar Co. v. Commissioner 18 T.C. 444 · 1952
Goodan v. Commissioner 12 T.C. 817 · 1949
R Ball for R Ball III by Appt v. Commissioner of IRS 742 F.3d 552 · Cir.
United States v. Luciano Pascacio-Rodriguez 749 F.3d 353 · Cir.