§1951

60 cases·7 followed·1 questioned·7 overruled·45 cited12% support

Statute text not available for this section.

60 Citing Cases

1951 (McKinney 2009). We conclude that the terms of the conservation deed, combined with the New York State law governing conservation easements, do not violate the perpetuity requirement of section 170(h) (5) (A). However, the Court of Appeals in Simmons also considered a factual issue: the remoteness of the possibil ty that the donee would a

Accordingly, we need only address whether petitioner received and erroneously reported the $15,000 loan finder's fee for the taxable year in issue. - 3 - Background For the taxable year 1978, petitioners timely filed a joint Federal income tax return, Form 1040, showing total income of $57,560. On March 26, 1980, petitioners file

Blanton v. Commissioner 94 T.C. 491 · 1990

20%) of the profits of a retail liquor store, from Jack Ham, owner of Donelson Pike Liquors, with his consent, such consent being induced through fear of economic loss and under color of official right. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1951 and 2. Although the essence of the Hobbs Act count is not apparent from the language of the indictment itself, the District Court’s charge to the jury with respect thereto leaves no doubt as to the factual predicate underlying the jury’s

United States v. Marion Michael O'Steen 133 F.4th 1200 · Cir.
United States v. Marion Michael O'Steen · Cir.
United States v. Gray 521 F.3d 514 · Cir.
United States v. Saadey · Cir.
United States v. Jackson · Cir.
United States v. Desmond Camp 903 F.3d 594 · Cir.
United States v. Russell J. Saadey, Jr. 393 F.3d 669 · Cir.
James Dimora v. United States 973 F.3d 496 · Cir.
United States v. Patricia Fountain 792 F.3d 310 · Cir.
United States v. Sheehan · Cir.
United States v. Scott 954 F.3d 74 · Cir.
United States v. Eric Woodberry 987 F.3d 1231 · Cir.
United States v. Arthur Pena 268 F.3d 215 · Cir.
United States v. Glen Allen McClung 483 F.3d 273 · Cir.
United States v. Sheehan 838 F.3d 109 · Cir.
Sallies v. Commissioner 83 T.C. 44 · 1984
United States v. Dequattro 118 F.4th 424 · Cir.
United States v. Tyren Cervenak 135 F.4th 311 · Cir.
United States v. Tyren Cervenak · Cir.
United States v. Thomas Greco, Jr. 734 F.3d 441 · Cir.
United States v. Ray 139 F.4th 126 · Cir.
United States v. Pullman 139 F.4th 35 · Cir.
United States v. Elias · Cir.
United States v. Kulick 629 F.3d 165 · Cir.
United States v. Michaud 243 F.3d 84 · Cir.
United States v. Meserve 271 F.3d 314 · Cir.
United States v. O'Brien 542 F.3d 921 · Cir.
United States v. Wallace 573 F.3d 82 · Cir.
United States v. Ganim 510 F.3d 134 · Cir.
United States v. Luciano Pascacio-Rodriguez 749 F.3d 353 · Cir.
United States v. Paige Mathison 760 F.3d 828 · Cir.
United States v. Kwame Kilpatrick 798 F.3d 365 · Cir.
United States v. Barnette · Cir.
United States v. Walker · Cir.
United States v. Swan 842 F.3d 28 · Cir.
United States v. Aracelis Ayala 917 F.3d 752 · Cir.
United States v. Razzouk 984 F.3d 181 · Cir.
United States v. Razzouk · Cir.
United States v. Scott 990 F.3d 94 · Cir.
Jeffery Bridges v. United States 991 F.3d 793 · Cir.
United States v. Rex Hammond 996 F.3d 374 · Cir.
United States v. Darrell Gillespie 27 F.4th 934 · Cir.
United States v. Chappelle 41 F.4th 102 · Cir.
Biaggi v. Commissioner 8 F. App'x 66 · Cir.
United States v. Rodriguez 54 F. App'x 739 · Cir.
United States v. Darrell Gillespie · Cir.
United States v. Michael Walker 473 F.3d 71 · Cir.
United States v. Glorious Shavers 693 F.3d 363 · Cir.
United States v. Donna 366 F. App'x 441 · Cir.
United States v. Donna 366 F. App'x 441 · Cir.
United States v. Ganim 256 F. App'x 399 · Cir.
United States v. Tiran Casteel 717 F.3d 635 · Cir.
United States v. Correia 55 F.4th 12 · Cir.
United States v. Joseph Miedzianowski 60 F.4th 1051 · Cir.