§1956
100 cases·20 followed·5 questioned·17 overruled·58 cited—20% support
Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §1956
Statute text not available for this section.
100 Citing Cases
§ 1956 (money laundering). Mr. Hampton was the wrongdoer, and HCM’s assets were seized as part of the penalty for his wrongdoing. The seized and forfeited assets were clearly “property constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of the violations in Count One of the Information.” Allowing him a deduction on
On August 30, 2011, the District Court entered its amendedjudgment in the criminal case against petitioner and ordered imprisonment, restitution, and forfeiture but expressly declined to order a fine.6 A. Imprisonment The District Court sentenced petitioner to 12 months' imprisonment for each ofthe two counts, to run concurrent
1956 (a) (3) (A) , (B) , and (C) ; and (iii) attempting to possess cocaine with .intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. sec. 846. . Plea Agreement, United States v. Penland, No. 7:05-cr-00710-HFF (Mar. 14, 2006), ECF No. 234. Charles Penland agreed to forfeit hatever interests he had in the properties listed in the agreement. Id. at 2-
1956(h), and of laundering those proceeds in violation of 18 U.S.C. secs. 1956(a)(2)(B) and 1957(a). On November 5, 1998, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (the District Court) submitted the criminal forfeiture count to the jury, which returned a special verdict finding that certain real and personal property,