§203

174 cases·18 followed·9 distinguished·1 questioned·4 criticized·6 overruled·136 cited10% support

Statute text not available for this section.

174 Citing Cases

OVERRULED Jean Steinberg, Donor, Petitioner 141 T.C. No. 8 · 2013

The Court finds neither rationale persuasive and appears to overrule McCord, at least to the extent it addresses the former.

Section 72(t)(2)(E) was added by section 203(a) of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Pub. L. 105-34, 111 Stat. 809. The report of the Committee on the Budget refers only to withdrawals from IRAs. See H. Conf. Rept. 105-148, at 288-289 (1997), 1997-4 C.B. (Vol. 1) 319, 610-611. It is undisputed that the retirement plan from which petitioner withdrew the $68,583 is a plan described in section 401(k), and, therefore, the exception contained in section 71(t)(2)(E) does not apply.

203(a), 111 Stat. 788, 809; H. Rept. 105-148 at 288-289 (1997), 1997-4 C.B. (Vol. 1) 319, 610-611. Because the deemed distribution in this case came from Mr. White’s 401(k) account, which is not an IRA plan, the exception set forth in sec. 72(t)(2)(E) does not apply.

As stated above, a finding to that effect would preclude the application of - 44 - section 2036; thus, the Empak stock decedent transferred to WCB Holdings would not be included his gross estate under section 2036(a). Moreover, if section 2036(a) does not apply to decedent's transfer, section 2035(a) cannot apply to the gifts he made of WCB Holdings class A governance units to CH Trust, GC Trust, and .QTIP Trust.

Section 72(t)(2)(E) was added by section 203(a) of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Pub. L. 105-34, 111 Stat. 788, 809. The Report of the Committee on the Budget refers only to withdrawals from IRAs. See H. Rept. 105- 148, at 288-289 (1997), 1997-4 C.B. (Vol. 1) 319, 610-611. It is undisputed that the retirement plan from which petitioner withdrew the $100,000 is a plan described in section 401(k), and, therefore, the exception contained in section 71(t)(2)(E) does not apply.

We hold, therefore, that the Hurfords cwere'not entitled to any discounts because of the FLPs when they calculated the amount of the monthly annuity payments, and so no discounts apply when detërmining the amount now includable in the estate .

Section 2036(a) isipplicable when three conditions are me (1) the decedent made an inter vivos transfer ofproperty; (2) the decedent's ransfer w'as not a bona fide-sale for adequate and full considsration; and (3).the)de edent retained an interest or right enunierated in section 2036(a)((1,) or (2) or( ) inthe transferred property;whichhe cr she did not relin uishbefore death. Respondent argues that these t ee conditions were s tisfied by decedent's transferofthe.woodland¢parcels to SÊLP, while

In section 203l’s accompanying regulations, we learn that value is determined by looking at the willing buyer and the willing seller, which then needs to be considered in conjunction with sections 2033 through 2044. Sec. 20.2031-1(b), Estate Tax Regs. In light of this definition of value (i.e., the willing buyer and the willing seller), we go to secti

The Property Is Includable Pursuant'to Section 203 6 The estate acknowledges that decedent's 51-percent interest in the 61st Street property is includable in her estate but contends that the remaining 49 percent of the property is owned by Mr .

Allen & Mary Doxtator, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2005-113 · 2005

2611. 12 In 1988, Congress amended sec. 1402(a) as it applied to the fishing rights of members of Indian tribes. Sec. 1402(a)(15); see Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-647, sec. 3043(c)(1), 102 Stat. 3642. When amending the self-employment tax statutes in a manner specifically concerning Indian tribes,

Held: In order for a taxpayer to have a “world headquarters” within the meaning of TRA sec. 204(a)(7), a taxpayer must have substantial international operations which are directed from the headquarters. The existence of employees stationed outside the United States, exports or foreign source income, liability for foreign taxes, a foreign permanent establishment, and having foreign subsidiaries or foreign joint venture operations are all indicia of international operations. P did not have any of

Inverworld, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-301 · 1996

On November 15, 1985, INC was registered with the SEC as an investment adviser pursuant to section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Inverworld Ltd., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-301 · 1996

On November 15, 1985, INC was registered with the SEC as an investment adviser pursuant to section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

the Landing Baseline Report. See PBBM-Rose Hill, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 900 F.3d at 204 (“[W]e give greater weight to the deed’s specific terms in paragraph 2.4.1 than its general language in paragraph 6.14” (citing Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 203(c) (Am. Law Inst. 1981))). Therefore, as with the River Tract easement, we will evaluate only 19 Two of the seven “Conservation Values” listed in the River Tract easement deed, i.e., the third and the sixth, are omitted from those values as sta

669, 673 (excluding Saturdays as the 90th day). 17 See Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-206, § 3463, 112 Stat. 685, 767. 19 D. Section 7459(d) confirms the jurisdictional nature of the 90-day deadline of section 6213(a). 1. Section 7459(d) provides a general rule that dismissal of a def

203 (a), 100 Stat. 2143. - 11 - A. Shed Willson built a large storage shed in 1987 hat was unaffected by the 1994 fire. Because he couldn't remember the month in which it was built, we depreciate his shed from January 15, 1987,' to May 15, 1999.1° We also find MACRS applies because the shed was built after 1986. Our analysis doesn't stop ther

Ron H. & Tricia S. Bell, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2009-203 · 2009

Palmer because they were in violation of section 203(e), (f), and (k) of the investment Advisers Act of 1940 .

Ron H. & Tricia S. Bell, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2009-203 · 2009

Palmer because they were in violation of section 203(e), (f), and (k) of the investment Advisers Act of 1940 .

This is evident in the report of the Committee on the Budget, which provides: Penalty free IRA withdrawals for education expenses--The bill provides that individuals may make penalty-free withdrawals from their IRAs to pay for the undergraduate and graduate higher education expenses of themselves, their spouses, their children and grandchildren or the children or grandchildren of their spouses.

This is evident in the report of the Committee on the Budget, which provides: Penalty free IRA withdrawals for education expenses--The bill provides that individuals may make penalty-free withdrawals from their IRAs to pay for the undergraduate and graduate higher education expenses of themselves, their spouses, their children and grandchildren or the children or grandchildren of their spouses.

105-34, section 203(a), 111 Stat. 788, 809. The report of the Committee on the Budget refers only to tax-free withdrawals from IRAs for higher education expenses. - 7 - See H. Rept. 105-148, at 288-289 (1997), 1997-4 C.B. (Vol. 1) 319, 610-611; see also Notice 97-60, sec. 4, 1997-2 C.B. 310, 317-318. Both section 401(k) plans and individual retirement pla

ion 72(t)(1) imposes that tax on an early distribution from an IRA. See also secs. 408(a), 4974(c)(4). Section 72(t)(2)(E) is an -7- exception to this rule. Section 72(t)(2)(E), added to the Code by the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Pub. L. 105-34, sec. 203(a), 111 Stat. 809, provides: (E) Distributions from individual retirement plans for higher education expenses.--Distributions to an individual from an individual retirement plan to the extent such distributions do not exceed the qualified high

Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-176 · 2002

d by TRA 1986 sec. 211, 100 Stat. 2167 (adding Code sec. 49(e)(1)(B)). To qualify for the transition rules under section 204(a), transition property with a class life of 20 years or more must be placed in service before January 1, 1991. See TRA 1986 sec. 203(b)(2)(A), 100 Stat. 2144. Section 204(a)(3) of TRA 1986 provides the transition rule for supply and service contracts. TRA 1986 sec. 204(a)(3), 100 Stat. 2149. As modified, section 204(a)(3) of TRA 1986 states: (3) Supply or service contract

RACMP Enterprises, Inc., Petitioner 114 T.C. No. 16 · 2000

1057, 1060. Sec. 203 of that Act is almost identical to section 471. In proposing this legislation, the Committee on Ways and Means explained: In many cases the only way that the net income can be determined is through the proper use of inventories. This is largely true in the case of manufacturing and merchandise concerns. The b

However, TRA section 203.(e), 100 Stat.

MidAmerican Energy Company, Petitioner 114 T.C. No. 35 · 2000

- 11 - The regulatory agencies had the authority to require petitioner to adjust rates to reflect such an excess, but TRA section 203(e), 100 Stat.

221. The PRA continues to be in effect for expenditures which, although incurred after Dec. 31:, 1980, are for the repair, maintenance, rehabilitation, or imprþvement of property placed in service before Jan. 1, 1981. - 23 - currently deducted.~ -See-Armco, Inc.· v. Commissioner, 88 T. . 946, 949 (1987) J . sec . 1. 167 (a) -11'

ection 204(a) transition rules. Section 203(b)(2)(C)(ii) of the Act provides that "property described in section 204(a) shall 6 Sec. 201 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, 100 Stat. 2121, modified the accelerated cost recovery system and sec. 203 of the Act provided that such modifications were generally effective for assets placed in service after Dec. 31, 1986. Secs. 203 and 204 of the Act provided a number of transition rules postponing the effective date of the sec. 201 changes.

MidAmerican Energy Company, Petitioner 114 T.C. No. 35 · 2000

- 11 - The regulatory agencies had the authority to require petitioner to adjust rates to reflect such an excess, but TRA section 203(e), 100 Stat.

1.471-3(d), Income Tax Regs., provides in pertinent part that in certain instances "costs may be approximated upon such basis as may be reasonable and in conformity with established trade practice in the particular industry." - 26 - section 203 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (1918 Act), ch.

Petitioner cites the legislative history of section 203 of the Revenue Act of 1924, ch.

In reliance tpon a revenue ruling that construed section 203 , the Governme it determined that the entire value of the property, less the actuaJial value of Verlena's life estate, was includable in Edward's cross estate.

te is: At least 7 but less than 20 years . . January 1, 1989 20 years or more . . . . . . . . . . January 1, 1991. * * * * * * * (C) * * * (ii) property described in section 204(a) shall be treated as having a class life of 20 years * * *. TRA 1986, sec. 203(b)(2), 100 Stat. 2144. In interpreting statutory language, courts look first to whether the relevant statutory language itself is plain and unambiguous. See United States v. Ron Pair Enters., Inc., 489 U.S. 235, 241 (1989); Chevron, U.S.A. v

203(a)(2)-1 (1934 Act). The regulations went on to provide that the word “reserves” did not include “reserves required to be maintained to provide for the ordinary running expenses of a business * * * such as * * * accrued but unsettled policy claims”. Id. The regulations, unlike their predecessors, did not reference any specific items of the

778, as amended). The estate contended that the amount of estate tax imposed by the statute should not be included in the base used as a measure of the tax. The Court of Appeals rejected the challenge, finding the regulation consistent with the meaning of the statute and the constitutional challenge “a claim so obviously unsound

William E. Levesque, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-57 · 1999

whether petitioner's pension payments are taxable. Even if he did, petitioner would not be entitled to relief under the ADA here. ADA section 202, 42 U.S.C. section 12132, provides:3 3 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101- 336, sec. 203, 104 Stat. 337 (current version at 42 U.S.C. sec. (continued...) - 11 - Subject to the provisions of this subchapter, no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denie

Petitioner cites the legislative history of section 203 of the Revenue Act of 1924, ch.

203(a)(2)-1 (1934 Act). The regulations went on to provide that the word “reserves” did not include “reserves required to be maintained to provide for the ordinary running expenses of a business * * * such as * * * accrued but unsettled policy claims”. Id. The regulations, unlike their predecessors, did not reference any specific items of the

1060, whenever, in the opinion of the Commissioner, such use was necessary in order to determine clearly the income of any taxpayer.7 Where goods taken in inventory were so intermingled that they could not be identified with specific invoices, Article 1582 of Regulations 45, promulgated under the 1918 Act, deemed such goods to be

Edward Nathan Levine, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1998-383 · 1998

625 (1935), 42 U.S.C. section 408(g)(2) (1988), misrepresentation of a Social Security account number in connection with opening the safety deposit boxes. Petitioner fled before he could be arrested for these charges. On February 28, 1995, U.S. marshals assisted by detectives from the City of Newport Police Department (the detect

Gary L. & Mary C. Pierce, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-411 · 1997

The Board noted that Congress did not intend, by the predecessor of section 471 (section 203 of the Revenue Act of 1918, ch.

Bruce & Elaine Selig, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1995-519 · 1995

203(a)(1), 100 Stat. 2143. The term "recovery property" does not appear in section 168, as restated. There is no indication, however, that Congress intended to reimpose the requirement, eliminated by ERTA, that a taxpayer must show the - 10 - useful life of property if the taxpayer is to determine the section 167 depreciation deduction under

United States Department of Labor v. North Carolina Growers Ass'n, Inc. 377 F.3d 345 · Cir.
Jennifer Durand v. The Hanover Insurance Group 806 F.3d 367 · Cir.
Esden v. Bank of Boston 229 F.3d 154 · Cir.
Esden v. Bank Of Boston 229 F.3d 154 · Cir.
United States Department Of Labor v. North Carolina Growers Association 377 F.3d 345 · Cir.
Minuto v. Commissioner 66 T.C. 616 · 1976
Gonnella v. Securities and Exchange Commission 954 F.3d 536 · Cir.
Rissman v. Commissioner 6 T.C. 1105 · 1946
Heinz, Thomas E. v. Central Laborers Pen · Cir.
Estate of Scholl v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 1265 · 1987
Dean v. Commissioner 83 T.C. 56 · 1984
Schweppe v. Commissioner 8 T.C. 1224 · 1947
West v. AK Steel Corporation 484 F.3d 395 · Cir.
Stanley Smith v. Robert Contini 205 F.3d 597 · Cir.
David T. Hunter (99-3620) Robert Allison (99-3623) v. Caliber System, Inc., F/k/a Roadway Services, Inc. 220 F.3d 702 · Cir.
West v. Ak Steel Corporation 484 F.3d 395 · Cir.
McCutcheon v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. 62 F.4th 674 · Cir.
Trout v. Commissioner 131 T.C. 239 · 2008
Haralampos & Irene Katerelos, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-340 · 1996
Technalysis Corp. v. Commissioner 101 T.C. 397 · 1993
Crooks v. Commissioner 92 T.C. 816 · 1989
Armco, Inc. v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 946 · 1987
Stieha v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 784 · 1987
Freytag v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 849 · 1987
Mosby v. Commissioner 86 T.C. 190 · 1986
Goldsmith v. Commissioner 86 T.C. 1134 · 1986
Foster v. Commissioner 80 T.C. 34 · 1983
Hughes v. Commissioner 81 T.C. 683 · 1983
Towne v. Commissioner 78 T.C. 791 · 1982
McQuiston v. Commissioner 78 T.C. 807 · 1982
Zuanich v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 428 · 1981
Estate of La Sala v. Commissioner 71 T.C. 752 · 1979
Estate of Lucas v. Commissioner 71 T.C. 838 · 1979
Davis v. Commissioner 69 T.C. 814 · 1978
Romy Hammes, Inc. v. Commissioner 68 T.C. 900 · 1977
Harrison v. Commissioner 59 T.C. 578 · 1973
Palmer v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 310 · 1969
Abegg v. Commissioner 50 T.C. 145 · 1968
Hays Corp. v. Commissioner 40 T.C. 436 · 1963
Alderson v. Commissioner 38 T.C. 215 · 1962
Petersen v. Commissioner 35 T.C. 962 · 1961
Farber v. Commissioner 36 T.C. 1142 · 1961
Black v. Commissioner 35 T.C. 90 · 1960
Howard v. Commissioner 32 T.C. 1284 · 1959
Fara Forni v. Commissioner 22 T.C. 975 · 1954
Liddon v. Commissioner 22 T.C. 1220 · 1954
Spangler v. Commissioner 18 T.C. 976 · 1952
Estate of Goodman v. Commissioner 17 T.C. 1017 · 1951
Riddlesbarger v. Commissioner 16 T.C. 820 · 1951
Spreckels v. Commissioner 13 T.C. 1079 · 1949
Estate of Stake v. Commissioner 11 T.C. 817 · 1948
Bradley v. Commissioner 9 T.C. 115 · 1947
Emery v. Commissioner 8 T.C. 979 · 1947
Koppers Coal Co. v. Commissioner 6 T.C. 1209 · 1946
Mather v. Commissioner 7 T.C. 1440 · 1946
Long v. Commissioner 5 T.C. 327 · 1945
Adams v. Commissioner 5 T.C. 351 · 1945
Mandel v. Commissioner 5 T.C. 684 · 1945
Soreng v. Commissioner 4 T.C. 870 · 1945
Adams v. Commissioner 4 T.C. 1186 · 1945
Ellis v. Commissioner 3 T.C. 106 · 1944
Shield Co. v. Commissioner 2 T.C. 763 · 1943
Beretta v. Commissioner 1 T.C. 86 · 1942
Kerkhof v. MCI Worldcom, Inc. 282 F.3d 44 · Cir.
United States v. Witham 648 F.3d 40 · Cir.
McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp. 482 F.3d 184 · Cir.
Ellis v. J.R.'s Country Stores, Inc. 779 F.3d 1184 · Cir.
Laurent v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 794 F.3d 272 · Cir.
Horton v. Ford Motor Co · Cir.
Connor, Michael F. v. CIR · Cir.
PBBM-Rose Hill, Ltd. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue 900 F.3d 193 · Cir.
Kenney v. Helix TCS 939 F.3d 1106 · Cir.
Evan Crocker v. Navient Solutions, L.L.C. 941 F.3d 206 · Cir.
Evan Crocker v. Navient Solutions, L.L.C. · Cir.
Soto v. Disney Severance Pay Plan 26 F.4th 114 · Cir.
Aramony v. United Way of America 254 F.3d 403 · Cir.
Michael F. Connor and Jane H. Connor v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 218 F.3d 733 · Cir.
Bell Atlantic Corporation v. United States 224 F.3d 220 · Cir.
Lucina Rojas-Reyes, A/K/A Lucina Mendoza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service 235 F.3d 115 · Cir.
William Aramony v. United Way Of America 254 F.3d 403 · Cir.
Bethlehem Steel Corporation and Affiliated Subsidiary Companies v. United States 270 F.3d 135 · Cir.
Thomas E. Heinz and Richard J. Schmitt, Jr. v. Central Laborers' Pension Fund 303 F.3d 802 · Cir.
United States v. Michael Norwood 49 F.4th 189 · Cir.
Lillie Horton v. Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Company Defined Benefit Master Trust Ford Motor Company Uaw Retirement Plan 427 F.3d 382 · Cir.
United States of America, and U.S. District Court Western District of New York v. Darnyl Parker 439 F.3d 81 · Cir.
McCARTHY v. DUN & BRADSTREET CORPORATION 482 F.3d 184 · Cir.
Minturn v. Monrad 64 F.4th 9 · Cir.