§2041 — Powers of appointment

81 cases·24 followed·8 distinguished·2 criticized·47 cited30% support

(a)In general

The value of the gross estate shall include the value of all property—

(1)Powers of appointment created on or before October 21, 1942

To the extent of any property with respect to which a general power of appointment created on or before

October 21, 1942

, is exercised by the decedent—

(A)

by will, or

(B)

by a disposition which is of such nature that if it were a transfer of property owned by the decedent, such property would be includible in the decedent’s gross estate under sections 2035 to 2038, inclusive;

(i)

such partial release occurred before

November 1, 1951

, or

(ii)

the donee of such power was under a legal disability to release such power on

October 21, 1942

, and such partial release occurred not later than 6 months after the termination of such legal disability.

but the failure to exercise such a power or the complete release of such a power shall not be deemed an exercise thereof. If a general power of appointment created on or before

October 21, 1942

, has been partially released so that it is no longer a general power of appointment, the exercise of such power shall not be deemed to be the exercise of a general power of appointment if—

(2)Powers created after October 21, 1942

To the extent of any property with respect to which the decedent has at the time of his death a general power of appointment created after October 21, 1942, or with respect to which the decedent has at any time exercised or released such a power of appointment by a disposition which is of such nature that if it were a transfer of property owned by the decedent, such property would be includible in the decedent’s gross estate under sections 2035 to 2038, inclusive. For purposes of this paragraph (2), the power of appointment shall be considered to exist on the date of the decedent’s death even though the exercise of the power is subject to a precedent giving of notice or even though the exercise of the power takes effect only on the expiration of a stated period after its exercise, whether or not on or before the date of the decedent’s death notice has been given or the power has been exercised.

(3)Creation of another power in certain cases

To the extent of any property with respect to which the decedent—

(A)

by will, or

(B)

by a disposition which is of such nature that if it were a transfer of property owned by the decedent such property would be includible in the decedent’s gross estate under section 2035, 2036, or 2037,

exercises a power of appointment created after

October 21, 1942

, by creating another power of appointment which under the applicable local law can be validly exercised so as to postpone the vesting of any estate or interest in such property, or suspend the absolute ownership or power of alienation of such property, for a period ascertainable without regard to the date of the creation of the first power.

(b)Definitions

For purposes of subsection (a)—

(1)General power of appointment

The term “general power of appointment” means a power which is exercisable in favor of the decedent, his estate, his creditors, or the creditors of his estate; except that—

(A)

A power to consume, invade, or appropriate property for the benefit of the decedent which is limited by an ascertainable standard relating to the health, education, support, or maintenance of the decedent shall not be deemed a general power of appointment.

(B)

A power of appointment created on or before

October 21, 1942

, which is exercisable by the decedent only in conjunction with another person shall not be deemed a general power of appointment.

(C)

In the case of a power of appointment created after

October 21, 1942

, which is exercisable by the decedent only in conjunction with another person—

(i)

If the power is not exercisable by the decedent except in conjunction with the creator of the power—such power shall not be deemed a general power of appointment.

(ii)

If the power is not exercisable by the decedent except in conjunction with a person having a substantial interest in the property, subject to the power, which is adverse to exercise of the power in favor of the decedent—such power shall not be deemed a general power of appointment. For the purposes of this clause a person who, after the death of the decedent, may be possessed of a power of appointment (with respect to the property subject to the decedent’s power) which he may exercise in his own favor shall be deemed as having an interest in the property and such interest shall be deemed adverse to such exercise of the decedent’s power.

(iii)

If (after the application of clauses (i) and (ii)) the power is a general power of appointment and is exercisable in favor of such other person—such power shall be deemed a general power of appointment only in respect of a fractional part of the property subject to such power, such part to be determined by dividing the value of such property by the number of such persons (including the decedent) in favor of whom such power is exercisable.

For purposes of clauses (ii) and (iii), a power shall be deemed to be exercisable in favor of a person if it is exercisable in favor of such person, his estate, his creditors, or the creditors of his estate.

(2)Lapse of power

The lapse of a power of appointment created after

October 21, 1942

, during the life of the individual possessing the power shall be considered a release of such power. The preceding sentence shall apply with respect to the lapse of powers during any calendar year only to the extent that the property, which could have been appointed by exercise of such lapsed powers, exceeded in value, at the time of such lapse, the greater of the following amounts:

(A)

$5,000, or

(B)

5 percent of the aggregate value, at the time of such lapse, of the assets out of which, or the proceeds of which, the exercise of the lapsed powers could have been satisfied.

(3)Date of creation of power

For purposes of this section, a power of appointment created by a will executed on or before October 21, 1942, shall be considered a power created on or before such date if the person executing such will dies before July 1, 1949, without having republished such will, by codicil or otherwise, after October 21, 1942.

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-1 Powers of appointment; in general
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-1(a) §20.2041-1(a)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-1(b) Expressly not exercisable in favor of the decedent or his creditors, or the decedent's estate or the creditors of his estate.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-1(c) Definition of “general power of appointment”—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-1(d) Definition of “exercise”.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-1(e) Time of creation of power.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-2 Powers of appointment created on or before October 21, 1942
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-2(a) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-2(b) Joint powers created on or before October 21, 1942.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-2(c) Exercise during life.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-2(d) Release or lapse.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-2(e) Partial release.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-2(f) Partial exercise.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-3 Powers of appointment created after October 21, 1942
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-3(a) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-3(b) Existence of power at death.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-3(c) Joint powers created after October 21, 1942.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-3(d) Releases, lapses, and disclaimers of general powers of appointment.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-3(e) Successive powers.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-3(f) Examples.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §20.2041-3(i) §20.2041-3(i)

81 Citing Cases

But we disagree with respondent's assertion that "there is no ambiguity in the specific language at issue".

Gerson’s power of appointment arose 1 By contrast, if a decedent holds a nongeneral power of appointment (i.e., a limited or special power of appointment), the appointive property is not taxable under sec. 2041.

t represents that he will allow an additional credit for (continued...) - 4 - (1) Whether the values of the assets of the Sidney Gore Marital Fund (Marital Fund assets) are includable in Sylvia Gore’s (decedent’s) gross estate under section 2033 or section 2041; (2) alternatively, if decedent completed a transfer of Marital Fund assets to the Gore Family Limited Partnership (GFLP) before her death, whether the values of those assets are includable in decedent’s gross estate under sections 2041,

t represents that he will allow an additional credit for (continued...) - 4 - (1) Whether the values of the assets of the Sidney Gore Marital Fund (Marital Fund assets) are includable in Sylvia Gore’s (decedent’s) gross estate under section 2033 or section 2041; (2) alternatively, if decedent completed a transfer of Marital Fund assets to the Gore Family Limited Partnership (GFLP) before her death, whether the values of those assets are includable in decedent’s gross estate under sections 2041,

the decedent’s death.” Section 2035(c) does not provide for the netting of “consideration” received for the payment of gift taxes. Second, section 2043(a), by its terms, applies to “transfers * * * described in sections 2035 to 2038, inclusive, and section 2041”. Section 2035(c) (unlike section 2035(a), for example), does not describe a “transfer” but merely requires that the gross estate be grossed up by the amount of gift taxes paid on gifts made within 3 years of the decedent’s death. The est

Estate of Gerson v. Commissioner 127 T.C. 139 · 2006

ct to which such individual is the transferor.” As a general rule, if a decedent holds a general power of appointment over property at death, the value of such property is included in the decedent’s gross estate for Federal estate tax purposes under section 2041. With exceptions not pertinent to our discussion, a general power of appointment means “a power which is exercisable in favor of the decedent, his estate, his creditors, or the creditors of his estate”. Sec. 2041(b)(1). GST tax generally

Posner (decedent) possessed a general power of appointment over the marital trust property in question under section 2041; and (2) whether the duty of consistency requires the estate to treat decedent as possessing a general power of appointment under section 2041.1 Finally, if we determine that the estate is entitled to a refund of an estate tax overpayment, we must decide whether this Court has jurisdiction at this juncture to award interest on the over

Section 2041 provides in pertinent part as follows: SEC. 2041. POWERS OF APPOINTMENT. (a) In General.--The value of the gross estate shall include the value of all property-- (1) Powers of appointment created on or before October 21, 1942.-–To the extent of any property with respect to which a general power of appointment created on or before Octob

Petitioner contends that Section Two of the amended trust created a general power of appointment over the income from the testamentary trust, under section 2041 and section 20.2041- 1(c)(1) and (2), Estate Tax Regs., and that a general power of appointment under section 2041 is sufficient to qualify the surviving spouse’s interest income in the testamentary trust for section 2056(b)(5) treatment, relying on Sec.

Section 2041 provides generally that a decedent's gross estate shall include the value of all property over which the decedent has a general power of appointment at the time of his or her death. See sec. 2041(a)(2). As mentioned above, at the time of her death, the decedent possessed a general power of appointment over a 25.235-percent limited part

Moreover, section 2041 provides generally that a decedent's gross estate shall include the value of all property subject to a "general" power of appointment.

's gross estate under sections 2034 to 2041, inclusive. The parties agree that decedent held a general power of appointment over the Marital Trust property and, consequently, the Marital Trust property was includable in decedent's gross estate under section 2041. Section 6324(a)(2) provides for the substantive liability of a trustee and similarly situated persons and does not depend on the anomalies of State law. See Schuster v. Commissioner, 312 F.2d 311, 315 (9th Cir. 1962) (interpreting secti

resident of Florida, died on September 5, 1987. Because of her general power of appointment over the Marital Trust property, the entire value of the trust property was included in her gross estate for Federal estate tax purposes in accordance with section 2041. Pursuant to her will, Mrs. Peterson exercised her general power of appointment only to the extent of directing that the Federal estate tax attributable to the inclusion of the Marital Trust property in her gross estate be paid from the M

Section 2043(a) says (with the key word italicized) Ifany one ofthe transfers * * * described in sections 2035 to 2038, inclusive, and section 2041 is made, created, exercised, or relinquished for a consideration in money or money's worth, but is - 42 - [*42] not a bona fide sale for an adequate and full consideration in money or money's worth, there shall be included in the gross estate only the excess ofthe fair market value at the time ofdeath ofthe property otherwise to be in

Section 2043(a) says (with the key word italicized) Ifany one ofthe transfers * * * described in sections 2035 to 2038, inclusive, and section 2041 is made, created, exercised, or relinquished for a consideration in money or money's worth, but is - 42 - [*42] not a bona fide sale for an adequate and full consideration in money or money's worth, there shall be included in the gross estate only the excess ofthe fair market value at the time ofdeath ofthe property otherwise to be in

ck was included in the value of the gross estate. Id. at 319. .The value of the stock the decedent owned outright was included under sec. 2033. Id. And the value of the stock that was subject to the decedent's power of appointment was included under sec. 2041. Id. Because the decedent in Estate of Fontana controlled the disposition of the.stock that was subject to the general power of appointment (unlike the property in the qualified terminable interest property trust in Estate of Mellinger), we

Among these specific sections are section 2036, which includes transfers where the decedent retained the possession of, the enjoyment of, or the right to designate persons who shall possess or enjoy transferred property or income therefrom; section 2038, which includes revocable transfers; and section 2041, which includes property over which the decedent held a general power of appointment.

Among these specific sections are section 2036, which includes transfers where the decedent retained the possession of, the enjoyment of, or the right to designate persons who shall possess or enjoy transferred property or income therefrom; section 2038, which includes revocable transfers; and section 2041, which includes property over which the decedent held a general power of appointment.

interests, rights, or powers enumerated and described in sections 2035 to 2038, inclusive, and section 2041 is made, created, exercised, or relinquished for a consideration in money or money’s worth, but is not a bona fide sale for an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth, there shall be included in the gross estate only the excess of the fair market value at the time of death of the property otherwise to be included on account of such transaction, over the value of the consi

1097, the predecessor to section 2041, states: A person having a general power of appointment is, with respect to disposition of the property at his death, in a position not unlike that of its owner.

ction with respect to property passing under or outside of the provisions of this Will or any codicil to it which is includible in my estate for the purpose of determining such tax, including, but not limited to, any tax on property includible under section 2041 (relating to life insurance proceeds), section 2042 - 5 - (relating to powers of appointment), or section 2044 (relating to qualified terminable interest property) of the Internal Revenue Code, or any comparable provision of state law, b

In General.–-If any one of the transfers, trusts, interests, rights, or powers enumerated and described in sections 2035 to 2038, inclusive, and section 2041 is made, created, exercised, or relinquished for a consideration in money or money’s worth, but is not a bona fide sale for an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth, there shall be included in the gross estate only the excess of the fair market value at the time of death of the property otherwise to be included on a

ations If the standard governing the exercise of a life- time or a testamentary power of appointment does not clearly indicate that a broader or more restrictive power of appointment is intended, the holder of the power of appointment may exercise it in his or her favor only for his or her health, education, support, or maintenance as described in section 2041 or 2514 of the Internal Revenue Code and the applicable regula- tions adopted under the section.

Section 2043(a) provides in pertinent part: (a) In General.--If any one of the transfers * * * described in sections 2035 to 2038, inclusive, and section 2041 is made * * * for a consideration in money or money's worth, but is not a bona fide sale for an adequate and full consideration in money or money's worth, there shall be included in the gross estate only the excess of the fair market value at the time of death of the property otherwise to be included on account of such transaction, ove

resident of Florida, died on September 5, 1987. Because of her general power of appointment over the marital trust property, the entire value of the trust property was included in her gross estate for Federal estate tax purposes in accordance with section 2041. Pursuant to her will, Mrs. Peterson exercised her general power of appointment only to the extent of directing that the Federal estate tax attributable to the inclusion of the marital trust property in her gross estate be paid from the m

Estate of Freeman v. Commissioner 67 T.C. 202 · 1976
Estate of Minot v. Commissioner 45 T.C. 578 · 1966
Estate of Edelman v. Commissioner 38 T.C. 972 · 1962
Estate of Kurz v. Commissioner 101 T.C. 44 · 1993
Estate of Little v. Commissioner 87 T.C. 599 · 1986
Estate of Sowell v. Commissioner 74 T.C. 1001 · 1980
Estate of Edmonds v. Commissioner 72 T.C. 970 · 1979
Estate of Penner v. Commissioner 67 T.C. 864 · 1977
Schwager v. Commissioner 64 T.C. 781 · 1975
Maxwell Trust v. Commissioner 58 T.C. 444 · 1972
Estate of Miller v. Commissioner 48 T.C. 265 · 1967
Estate of Lombard v. Commissioner 46 T.C. 310 · 1966
Estate of Lanigan v. Commissioner 45 T.C. 247 · 1965
Estate of Levitt v. Commissioner 95 T.C. 289 · 1990
Estate of Shafer v. Commissioner 80 T.C. 1145 · 1983
Estate of Pollock v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 1296 · 1981
Estate of Crafts v. Commissioner 74 T.C. 1439 · 1980
Estate of Sorenson v. Commissioner 72 T.C. 1180 · 1979
Estate of Drake v. Commissioner 67 T.C. 844 · 1977
Estate of Pfeifer v. Commissioner 69 T.C. 294 · 1977
Estate of Morse v. Commissioner 69 T.C. 408 · 1977
Estate of Smith v. Commissioner 66 T.C. 415 · 1976
Estate of Iversen v. Commissioner 65 T.C. 391 · 1975
Estate of Cox v. Commissioner 59 T.C. 825 · 1973
Estate of Jones v. Commissioner 56 T.C. 35 · 1971
Estate of Towle v. Commissioner 54 T.C. 368 · 1970
Estate of Ware v. Commissioner 55 T.C. 69 · 1970
Estate of Redford v. Commissioner 55 T.C. 364 · 1970
Estate of Lion v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 601 · 1969
Estate of Davis v. Commissioner 51 T.C. 269 · 1968
Estate of Bomash v. Commissioner 50 T.C. 667 · 1968
Estate of Prell v. Commissioner 48 T.C. 67 · 1967
Estate of O'Nan v. Commissioner 47 T.C. 648 · 1967
Estate of Nelson v. Commissioner 47 T.C. 279 · 1966
Estate of Glen v. Commissioner 45 T.C. 323 · 1966
Estate of Graham v. Commissioner 46 T.C. 415 · 1966
Estate of Keller v. Commissioner 44 T.C. 851 · 1965
Estate of Bosch v. Commissioner 43 T.C. 120 · 1964
Borbonus v. Commissioner 42 T.C. 983 · 1964
Estate of Gregory v. Commissioner 39 T.C. 1012 · 1963
United States v. James D. Paulson 68 F.4th 528 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.