§218 — Repealed. Pub. L. 95–600, title I, § 113(a)(1), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2778]

39 cases·16 followed·4 distinguished·19 cited41% support

[§ 218. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–600, title I, § 113(a)(1), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2778] Section, added Pub. L. 92–178, title VII, § 702(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 561; amended Pub. L. 93–625, §§ 11(d), 12(b), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2120; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, § 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834, related to contributions to candidates for public office. A prior section 218 was renumbered section 226 of this title. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries Effective Date of RepealRepeal effective with respect to contributions the payment of which is made after Dec. 31, 1978, in taxable years beginning after such date, see section 113(d) of Pub. L. 95–600, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 24 of this title.

39 Citing Cases

Finally, she is not a statutory employee under section 3121(d)(4) because there is no evidence she performs services included under an agreement entered into pursuant to section 218 ofthe Social Security Act.

Other federal laws give us even more hints--for example, the Social Security Administration adopted a definition (identical to the one that the Commissioner used in his revenue ruling) for applying section 218 ofthe Social Security Act:7 When a public official receives remuneration for services in the form ofa "fee" directly from members ofthe public with whom he or she does business, that is considered to be a "fee." Otherwise, ifpayment is made to a public official from government funds, and n

an agreement entered into by such State and the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to section 218 of the Social Security Act", 42 U .S .C .

In support of this argument, respondent points out that petitioner’s employment contracts with the DOI constitute agreements entered into pursuant to section 218 of the Social Security Act.

Petitioners' argument fails to account for the fact that In re Ahrens' Estate and In re Allen's Will were decided under a different statute, Surrogate's Court Act (SCA), section 218, the predecessor to EPTL section 11-1.5.

services for remuneration for any person-- (A) as an agent-driver or commission- driver * * *; (B) as a full-time insurance salesman; (C) as a home worker * * *; or (D) as a traveling or city salesman * * *; * * * [under specified conditions]; or (4) any individual who performs services that are included under an agreement entered into pursuant to section 218 of the Social Security Act.

Mike J. Graham Trucking, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2003-49 · 2003

services for remuneration for any person-- (A) as an agent-driver or commission- driver * * *; (B) as a full-time insurance salesman; (C) as a home worker * * *; or (D) as a traveling or city salesman * * *; * * * [under specified conditions]; or (4) any individual who performs services that are included under an agreement entered into pursuant to section 218 of the Social Security Act.

Superior Proside, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2003-50 · 2003

ervices for remuneration for any person-- (A) as an agent-driver or commission- driver * * *; (B) as a full-time insurance salesman; (C) as a home worker * * *; or (D) as a traveling or city salesman * * *·, * * * [under specified conditions]; or (4) any individual who performs services that are included under an agreement entered into pursuant to section 218 of the Social Security Act.

Nu-Look Design, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2003-52 · 2003

s for remuneration for any person-- (A) as an agent-driver or commission- driver * * *; - 8 - (B) as a full-time insurance salesman; (C) as a home worker * * *; or (D) as a traveling or city salesman * * *; * * * [under specified conditions]; or (4) any individual who performs services that are included under an agreement entered into pursuant to section 218 of the Social Security Act.

Water-Pure Systems, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2003-53 · 2003

services for remuneration for any person-- (A) as an agent-driver or commission- driver * * *; (B) as a full-time insurance salesman; (C) as a home worker * * *; or (D) as a traveling or city salesman * * *; * * * [under specified conditions]; or (4) any individual who performs services that are included under an agreement entered into pursuant to section 218 of the Social Security Act.

services for remuneration for any person-- (A) as an agent-driver or commission- driver * * *; (B) as a full-time insurance salesman; (C) as a home worker * * *; or (D) as a traveling or city salesman * * *; * * * [under specified conditions]; or (4) any individual who performs services that are included under an agreement entered into pursuant to section 218 of the Social Security Act.

600, 617; see also Staff of Joint Comm.

The bill as reported by the Senate Finance Committee and as passed by the Senate included subsection (h), as proposed to be enacted by section 218(a)(2) of the bill, but did not have a provision corresponding to paragraph (5)--the election-out provision.

The bill as reported by the Senate Finance Committee and as passed by the Senate included subsection (h), as proposed to be enacted by section 218(a)(2) of the bill, but did not have a provision corresponding to paragraph (5) — the election-out provision.

Volwiler v. Commissioner 57 T.C. 367 · 1971
Lantz Bros. v. Commissioner 5 T.C. 896 · 1945
United States v. George Rivera, Also Known as Boy George 376 F.3d 86 · Cir.
Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research v. United States 568 F.3d 675 · Cir.
Center for Family Medicine v. United States 614 F.3d 937 · Cir.
Amel Lueth v. Charles Beach · Cir.
Mayo Foundation v. United States · Cir.
University of Texas System Ex Rel. University of Texas Medical Foundation v. United States 759 F.3d 437 · Cir.
United States v. Intini 18 F. App'x 411 · Cir.
Anderson v. Commissioner 67 T.C. 522 · 1976
Wolder v. Commissioner 58 T.C. 974 · 1972
Granan v. Commissioner 55 T.C. 753 · 1971
Gerstacker v. Commissioner 49 T.C. 522 · 1968
Atkinson v. Commissioner 44 T.C. 39 · 1965
Gerard v. Commissioner 37 T.C. 826 · 1962
Estate of Doyle v. Commissioner 32 T.C. 1209 · 1959
McNamara v. Commissioner 19 T.C. 1001 · 1953
Thorrez v. Commissioner 5 T.C. 60 · 1945
United States v. Coonan 143 F.4th 119 · Cir.
Lueth v. Beach 498 F.3d 795 · Cir.
United States v. Corey Grant 887 F.3d 131 · Cir.
Emilio Torres v. Salvatore Vitale 954 F.3d 866 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.