§2255

131 cases·15 followed·4 questioned·1 limited·64 overruled·47 cited11% support

Statute text not available for this section.

131 Citing Cases

2255 (2006) as to his conviction for false statements on his 2000 tax return. The District Court for the Southern District ofMississippi denied that reliefin 2010. See United States v. Adams, No. 3:07cr31-DPJ-LRA, 2010 WL 55937 (S.D. Miss. Jan. 4, 2010). Mr. Adams was released from prison in 2011. -4- [*4] tried to set up a meeting, Mr. Adams

2255, urging that the tax-loss calculation underly- ing their sentences was erroneous. In support ofthat contention, they pointed to IRS spreadsheets, ofwhich they had recently become aware, indicating that they could be entitled to substantial additional deductions against their 2003-2006 4In the closing agreement petitioners conceded liabili

2255, urging that the tax-loss calculation underly- ing their sentences was erroneous. In support ofthat contention, they pointed to IRS spreadsheets, ofwhich they had recently become aware, indicating that they could be entitled to substantial additional deductions against their 2003-2006 4In the closing agreement petitioners conceded liabili

2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, but the district court denied that motion, United States v. Beam, 2016 WL 1557599 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 18, 2016), and the Third Circuit denied his request for a certificate ofappealability, United States v. Beam, No. 16-2216 (3d Cir. Sept. 15, 2016). B. Civil Tax Examination Petitioner has resided

Again, petitioner was unsuccessful. McAuliffe v. United States, 514 F. App'x 542 (6th Cir. 2013). Petitioner also challenged his Federal conviction while resisting professional discipline by the State ofOhio. However, in 2009 the Supreme Court 4 The indictment included six counts: two counts ofmail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. sec. 1

Walter C. Anderson, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2009-44 · 2009

2255 (2006) to vacate, set aside, or correct a sentence) . The IRS's notice of deficiency On July 17, 2007, the IRS issued a notice of deficiency to Mr. Anderson for the years 1995 through 1999, more than six and a half years after he had filed the latest of his returns for those years . The adjustments in the notice of deficiency were derived

2255 was denied by the District Court in August 1998, and the Court of Appeals declined to issue a certificate of appealability. Appeals filed by petitioner from other adverse orders of the District Court were equally unsuccessful on appeal. United States v. Minneman, 87 AFTR 2d 2001-1920 (7th Cir. 2001).3 E. The Notice of Deficiency In May 19

Jeffrey R. Taylor, Petitioner 113 T.C. No. 16 · 1999

section 2255 (1994). That motion was denied on January 17, 1995. Petitioner appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed the denial of relief by the District Court. See United States v. Taylor, 70 F.3d 121 (9th - 6 - Cir. 1995). Subsequently, the Supreme Court denied petitioner's petition for a writ of certiorari. Se

Taylor v. Commissioner 113 T.C. 206 · 1999

section 2255 (1994). That motion was denied on January 17, 1995. Petitioner appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed the denial of relief by the District Court. See United States v. Taylor, 70 F.3d 121 (9th Cir. 1995). Subsequently, the Supreme Court denied petitioner’s petition for a writ of certiorari. See Taylo

Richard A. Cole, M.D., Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1998-452 · 1998

section 2255 (1994). The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania dismissed the motion. Dr. Cole further contends that, on July 25, 1994, he filed an appeal that he claims was not docketed until November 6, 1994. The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed the appeal as untimely on December 30, 1994. He appealed the dis

John L. Boettner, Jr., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1998-359 · 1998

The District Court denied petitioner's motion on March 31, 1994. Petitioner appealed the District Court's judgment to the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. In an unpublished per curiam opinion filed April 21, 1995, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court. On June 14, 1995, the

Dwight L. & Beverly S. McKenna, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1998-45 · 1998

On July 29, 1993, U.S. District Judge Schwartz entered an Order and Reasons denying petitioner's motion. Petitioner appealed the District Court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. sec. 2255 to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On June 3, 1994, the Court of Appeals filed its opinion affirming the District Court's denial of pe

United States v. Patrick Sutherland · Cir.
United States v. Hohn 123 F.4th 1084 · Cir.
Baranski v. United States 515 F.3d 857 · Cir.
United States v. Hamilton 604 F.3d 572 · Cir.
Hamblen v. United States 591 F.3d 471 · Cir.
Sotirion v. United States 617 F.3d 27 · Cir.
Berthoff v. United States · Cir.
Evans v. Zych 644 F.3d 447 · Cir.
Brinar v. Williamson 245 F.3d 515 · Cir.
United States v. Erwin · Cir.
United States v. Charles Barefoot, Jr. 754 F.3d 226 · Cir.
Deidre Clark v. United States 764 F.3d 653 · Cir.
United States v. Mary Waters 770 F.3d 1146 · Cir.
United States v. Edward Ross 801 F.3d 374 · Cir.
Richard Hamblen v. United States · Cir.
United States v. Perretta 804 F.3d 53 · Cir.
United States v. Jenkins · Cir.
United States v. Cook · Cir.
United States v. Grier · Cir.
Keith Baranski v. United States · Cir.
Keith Baranski v. United States 880 F.3d 951 · Cir.
United States v. Corey Grant 887 F.3d 131 · Cir.
United States v. Bobbie London, Jr. 937 F.3d 502 · Cir.
United States v. Bobbie London, Jr. · Cir.
In re John W. Franklin 950 F.3d 909 · Cir.
John Worman v. Frederick Entzel 953 F.3d 1004 · Cir.
John Worman v. Frederick Entzel · Cir.
John Worman v. Frederick Entzel · Cir.
United States v. Scott 954 F.3d 74 · Cir.
James Dimora v. United States 973 F.3d 496 · Cir.
United States v. Scott 990 F.3d 94 · Cir.
Derrick Taylor v. Angela Owens 990 F.3d 493 · Cir.
Jeffery Bridges v. United States 991 F.3d 793 · Cir.
United States v. Riley Briones, Jr. 35 F.4th 1150 · Cir.
United States v. Riley Briones, Jr. · Cir.
United States v. Justin Werle 35 F.4th 1195 · Cir.
Barrow v. United States 8 F. App'x 286 · Cir.
Zack v. United States 9 F. App'x 394 · Cir.
Harrison v. Lamanna 10 F. App'x 309 · Cir.
Klawonn v. United States 11 F. App'x 559 · Cir.
Damico v. Hemingway 39 F. App'x 196 · Cir.
Burt v. Hemingway 57 F. App'x 230 · Cir.
Manko v. United States 63 F. App'x 570 · Cir.
Reynolds v. United States 64 F. App'x 508 · Cir.
John Keith Blakely and John Emmett Long v. United States of America 276 F.3d 853 · Cir.
United States v. Bonnie Burnette Erwin, Also Known as Carlos Erwin, Also Known as Ralph Erwin 277 F.3d 727 · Cir.
William D. Zack v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 291 F.3d 407 · Cir.
Frederic W. Berthoff v. United States 308 F.3d 124 · Cir.
United States v. Scott Cook 329 F.3d 335 · Cir.
United States v. William R. Jenkins 333 F.3d 151 · Cir.
United States v. Abdul Grier 354 F.3d 210 · Cir.
United States v. George Rivera, Also Known as Boy George 376 F.3d 86 · Cir.
Joseph Sapia v. United States 433 F.3d 212 · Cir.
United States v. Robert Lillard 685 F.3d 773 · Cir.
United States v. Anthony Lomax 51 F.4th 222 · Cir.
United States v. Drive 66 F. App'x 617 · Cir.
United States v. O'Georgia 80 F. App'x 439 · Cir.
Allamby v. United States 85 F. App'x 784 · Cir.
Ward v. Barron 93 F. App'x 41 · Cir.
United States v. Baldon 457 F. App'x 393 · Cir.
In re Parker 575 F. App'x 415 · Cir.
Thompson v. United States 64 F.4th 412 · Cir.
Spencer Elden v. Nirvana L.L.C. 88 F.4th 1292 · Cir.
United States v. Patrick Sutherland 103 F.4th 200 · Cir.
United States v. Wynder, Jr. · Cir.
United States v. Rivernider · Cir.
United States v. Michael Norwood 49 F.4th 189 · Cir.
United States v. Rivernider 828 F.3d 91 · Cir.
United States v. Tso · Cir.
United States v. Aaron 590 F.3d 405 · Cir.
United States v. Bishop 629 F.3d 462 · Cir.
Brown v. United States 636 F.3d 674 · Cir.
United States v. Christopher Aaron · Cir.
Robinson, Charles R. v. United States · Cir.
United States v. Jim Guy Tucker · Cir.
United States v. Abraham Fisch 851 F.3d 402 · Cir.
United States v. One Assortment of 93 NFA Regulated Weapons 897 F.3d 961 · Cir.
United States v. Flete-Garcia 925 F.3d 17 · Cir.
United States v. Orvil Hassebrock 21 F.4th 494 · Cir.
Charles R. Robinson, IV v. United States 416 F.3d 645 · Cir.
United States v. Jim Guy Tucker 419 F.3d 719 · Cir.
George Ryan v. United States 688 F.3d 845 · Cir.
United States v. Mitchell 96 F. App'x 994 · Cir.
Guzzetta v. Commissioner 78 T.C. 173 · 1982
Naysha Oquendo v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue · Cir.
United States v. James Abrams · Cir.
United States v. Stuart 507 F.3d 391 · Cir.
United States v. George 448 F.3d 96 · Cir.
United States v. Alcorn 638 F.3d 819 · Cir.
United States v. Jimenez · Cir.
United States v. Paige Mathison 760 F.3d 828 · Cir.
United States v. Kwame Kilpatrick 798 F.3d 365 · Cir.
United States v. Osborne · Cir.
United States v. Stuart · Cir.
United States v. Gwinnett · Cir.
United States v. Jermaine Harris · Cir.
United States v. Mark Backer · Cir.
United States v. Charles T. Andreano · Cir.
United States v. Duane Carl Carpenter · Cir.
United States v. Juan Ramos 892 F.3d 599 · Cir.
United States v. Charles Bolton · Cir.
United States v. Charles Bolton · Cir.
United States v. Charles Bolton 908 F.3d 75 · Cir.
United States v. Christy 916 F.3d 814 · Cir.
United States v. Martin 45 F. App'x 378 · Cir.
United States v. Brice Earl Christians 200 F.3d 1124 · Cir.
Percy Stanley Harris v. Ronald Hutchinson, Warden, Maryland House of Corrections J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Maryland 209 F.3d 325 · Cir.
United States v. Edward Jimenez, Also Known as Big Eddie Paul Santivanez 256 F.3d 330 · Cir.
United States v. Mark Backer, United States of America v. Mark Backer 362 F.3d 504 · Cir.
United States v. Selgas · Cir.
United States v. Charles Thomas Andreano, III 417 F.3d 967 · Cir.
United States v. Angelica Gwinnett 483 F.3d 200 · Cir.
United States v. Salvagno 343 F. App'x 702 · Cir.
United States v. Salvagno 343 F. App'x 702 · Cir.
United States v. Dundon 349 F. App'x 588 · Cir.
United States v. Dundon 349 F. App'x 588 · Cir.
United States v. Stevens 657 F. App'x 69 · Cir.
United States v. Julio Rivera 62 F.4th 778 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.