§2510
33 cases·2 followed·6 distinguished·1 limited·1 overruled·23 cited—6% support
Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §2510
Statute text not available for this section.
33 Citing Cases
Petitioners ask the Court to disregard or to distinguish our Opinion in M. Petitioners assert as to the former that the Department ofLabor has the primary authority to interpret the prohibited transaction rules and that the Court in M interpreted those rules inconsistentlywith the interpretation ofthe Department of Labor. Petitioners assert as to the latter that the Court's decision in Peek was driven by findings that the corporation and the IRA were inseparable and that the corporation's assets
2510.3-3(b) and (c)(1) (1997),10 no "employee" was a participant in the plan 9(...continued) man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims; (C) by diversifying the investments of the plan so as to minimize the risk of large losses, unless under the