§2518 — Disclaimers

40 cases·10 followed·4 distinguished·3 criticized·1 overruled·22 cited25% support

(a)General rule

For purposes of this subtitle, if a person makes a qualified disclaimer with respect to any interest in property, this subtitle shall apply with respect to such interest as if the interest had never been transferred to such person.

(b)Qualified disclaimer defined

For purposes of subsection (a), the term “qualified disclaimer” means an irrevocable and unqualified refusal by a person to accept an interest in property but only if—

(1)

such refusal is in writing,

(2)

such writing is received by the transferor of the interest, his legal representative, or the holder of the legal title to the property to which the interest relates not later than the date which is 9 months after the later of—

(A)

the day on which the transfer creating the interest in such person is made, or

(B)

the day on which such person attains age 21,

(3)

such person has not accepted the interest or any of its benefits, and

(4)

as a result of such refusal, the interest passes without any direction on the part of the person making the disclaimer and passes either—

(A)

to the spouse of the decedent, or

(B)

to a person other than the person making the disclaimer.

(c)Other rules

For purposes of subsection (a)—

(1)Disclaimer of undivided portion of interest

A disclaimer with respect to an undivided portion of an interest which meets the requirements of the preceding sentence shall be treated as a qualified disclaimer of such portion of the interest.

(2)Powers

A power with respect to property shall be treated as an interest in such property.

(3)Certain transfers treated as disclaimers

A written transfer of the transferor’s entire interest in the property—

(A)

which meets requirements similar to the requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (b), and

(B)

which is to a person or persons who would have received the property had the transferor made a qualified disclaimer (within the meaning of subsection (b)),

shall be treated as a qualified disclaimer.

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-1 Qualified disclaimers of property; in general
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-1(a) Applicability—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-1(b) Effect of a qualified disclaimer.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-1(c) Effect of local law—(1) In general—(i) Interests created before 1982.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-1(d) Cross-reference.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-2 Requirements for a qualified disclaimer
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-2(a) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-2(b) Writing—(1) Requirements.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-2(c) Time limit—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-2(d) No acceptance of benefits—(1) Acceptance.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-2(e) Passage without direction by the disclaimant of beneficial enjoyment of disclaimed interest—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-2(i) §25.2518-2(i)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-3 Disclaimer of less than an entire interest
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-3(a) Disclaimer of a partial interest—(1) In general—(i) Interest.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-3(b) Disclaimer of undivided portion.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-3(c) Disclaimer of a pecuniary amount.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §25.2518-3(d) Examples.

40 Citing Cases

Section 2518 provides an exception which allows a disclaimant to avoid the second transfer tax for a transfer of an interest in property resulting from a qualified disclaimer .

After concessions, including respondent's concession of the penalty, the sole issue remaining for decision is whether, for purposes of section 2518, decedent made a qualified disclaimer of property having a value of $455,753, or of any other amount, that otherwise would have passed to him from his predeceased spouse as part of the residue of her estate.

to the disclaimer — a “savings clause.” This clause said that to the extent that the disclaimer set forth above in this instrument is not effective to make it a qualified disclaimer, Christine Christiansen Hamilton hereby takes such actions to the extent necessary to make the disclaimer set forth above a qualified disclaimer within the meaning of section 2518 of the Code.

provides for a deduction from the gross estate of a decedent for the value of property that passes from the decedent to the surviving spouse. Section 2046 provides that disclaimers of property interests passing upon death are treated as provided in section 2518. - 6 - Section 2518 provides that, if a person makes a qualified disclaimer with respect to any interest in property, the disclaimed interest is treated as if it had never been transferred to the person making the qualified disclaimer. T

If a surviving spouse disclaims an interest in property passing to such spouse from a decedent, the efficacy of the disclaimer will be determined by section 2518 and the corresponding regulations.

Upen G. & Avanti D. Patel, Petitioner 138 T.C. No. 23 · 2012

2002), the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit upheld the validity ofsection 25.2518-3(b), Gift Tax Regs., which provides the same definition for an undivided portion ofa disclaimant's entire interest in property for purposes ofsection 2518." In discerning the meaning of"undivided interest", the Court ofAppeals stated: The term "undivided" in its common usage means "not separated out into parts or shares." Webster's Third New International Dictionary 2492 (1986).

Patel v. Commissioner 138 T.C. 395 · 2012

342 (8th Cir. 2002), the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit upheld the validity of section 25.2518-3(b), Gift Tax Regs., which provides the same definition for an undivided portion of a disclaimant’s entire interest in property for purposes of section 2518. In discerning the meaning of “undivided interest”, the Court of Appeals stated: The term “undivided” in its common usage means “not separated out into parts or shares.” Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 2492 (1986). We are mo

were placed in Trust B and distributed to the beneficiaries thereof. - 2 - Held: Trust assets worth approximately $617,317 at D’s date of death are includable in the gross estate on account of absence of a disclaimer qualified within the meaning of sec. 2518, I.R.C. Held, further, no charitable deduction is allowable with respect to distributions to the American Cancer Society, Yale University School of Law, or the State of Israel. Richard V. Vermazen, for petitioner. Christine V. Olsen, for res

After concessions, the issues for decision are: (1) Whether a qualified disclaimer within the meaning of section 2518 was made with respect to trust assets worth approximately $617,317 at the date of death of Leona Engelman (decedent); and (2) whether, to the extent that the foregoing trust assets are included in the gross estate, the estate is entitled to a charitable deduction for certain amounts distributed.

m their interests.” Estate of Bennett v. Commissioner, 100 T.C. 42, 58 (1993). Nonetheless, such a disclaimer can be “qualified” and effective for purposes of Federal estate tax law only to the extent that it satisfies the requirements enumerated in section 2518. See sec. 2046. Section 2518 reads in part as follows: SEC. 2518. DISCLAIMERS. (a) General Rule.--For purposes of this subtitle, if a person makes a qualified disclaimer with respect to any interest in property, this subtitle shall apply

In the case of qualified disclaimers, moreover, section 2518 specifically provides that if a person makes a qualified disclaimer with respect to any interest in property, this subtitle shall apply with respect to such interest as if the interest had never been transferred to such person.

ecedent's death, Mrs. Rapp was entitled to receive annual distributions of all of the income from the trust because the actions of the co- trustees and the guardian ad litem in consenting to the reformation constituted a "qualified disclaimer" under section 2518. Fourth, petitioner argues that, as of the date of decedent's death, Mrs. Rapp was entitled to receive annual distributions of all of the income from the trust because the cotrustees were obligated to make such distributions to Mrs. Rapp

Estate of Clack v. Commissioner 106 T.C. 131 · 1996

In the case of qualified disclaimers, moreover, section 2518 specifically provides that if a person makes a qualified disclaimer with respect to any interest in property, this subtitle shall apply with respect to such interest as if the interest had never been transferred to such person.

United States v. Bansal 663 F.3d 634 · Cir.
United States v. Jackson · Cir.
United States v. Lee · Cir.
United States v. Robert W. Lee, Sr. 359 F.3d 194 · Cir.
Patricia London, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1998-346 · 1998
Estate of Monroe v. Commissioner 104 T.C. 352 · 1995
Estate of Bennett v. Commissioner 100 T.C. 42 · 1993
Jewett v. Commissioner 70 T.C. 430 · 1978
Estate of Christiansen v. Commissioner 586 F.3d 1061 · Cir.
Thomas J. Walshire v. United States · Cir.
Estate of Helen Christiansen v. CIR · Cir.
Thomas J. Walshire, of the Estate of Edward M. Walshire Everette R. Walshire, of the Estate of Edward M. Walshire v. United States 288 F.3d 342 · Cir.
Jonson v. Commissioner 118 T.C. 106 · 2002
Estate of Clayton v. Commissioner 97 T.C. 327 · 1991
Estate of Marine v. Commissioner 97 T.C. 368 · 1991
McDonald v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 293 · 1987
Estate of Dancy v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 550 · 1987
Poinier v. Commissioner 86 T.C. 478 · 1986
Estate of Boyd v. Commissioner 85 T.C. 1056 · 1985
Griswold v. Commissioner 81 T.C. 141 · 1983
Perillo v. Commissioner 78 T.C. 534 · 1982
Estate of Best v. Commissioner 76 T.C. 122 · 1981
United States v. Gray 521 F.3d 514 · Cir.
United States v. Hull · Cir.
United States v. James D. Paulson 68 F.4th 528 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.