§272 — Disposal of coal or domestic iron ore
137 cases·10 followed·4 distinguished·1 questioned·122 cited—7% support
Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §272
Where the disposal of coal or iron ore is covered by section 631, no deduction shall be allowed for expenditures attributable to the making and administering of the contract under which such disposition occurs and to the preservation of the economic interest retained under such contract, except that if in any taxable year such expenditures plus the adjusted depletion basis of the coal or iron ore disposed of in such taxable year exceed the amount realized under such contract, such excess, to the extent not availed of as a reduction of gain under section 1231, shall be a loss deductible under section 165(a). This section shall not apply to any taxable year during which there is no income under the contract.
Treasury Regulations
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.272-1 Expenditures relating to disposal of coal or domestic iron ore
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.272-1(a) Introduction.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.272-1(b) In general.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.272-1(c) Losses.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.272-1(d) Examples of expenditures.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.272-1(e) Nonapplication of section.
137 Citing Cases
680, 741. 15 See Revenue Act of 1942, ch. 619, § 168, 56 Stat. 798, 876. 16 See International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, ch. 652, § 203, 59 Stat. 669, 673 (excluding Saturdays as the 90th day). 17 See Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-206, § 3463, 112 Stat. 685, 767. 19 D. Sec
to account the standard mileage rates previously referenced and petitioners' credible presentation regarding the number ofmiles driven for such purposes. 7Petitioner's pickup truck fits within the definition ofa "passenger automobile" for purposes ofsec. 272. See sec. 280F(d)(5). - 11 - As far as substantiation goes, the above reasoning applies to all ofthe mileage included in the vehicle expense deductions here in dispute. Adequately substantiating the mileage driven for purposes ofsection 274,
Before the APA, "prior, adequate, and exclusive opportunity forjudicial review"6 ofa notice ofdeficiency was provided in the predecessor statutes to section 6213(a)--i.e., in section 272(a)(1) ofthe Internal Revenue Code of 1939, as in effect when the APA was enacted in 1946.
272; see McCombs, 30 F.3d at 326 (observing that what constitutes fair consideration must be determined on a case-by-case basis). The parties have stipulated that the conveyances from Diebold New York to petitioners were not made in exchange for any property or in satisfaction ofan antecedent debt. Thus, the transfers were not made in exchange
272; see McCombs, 30 F.3d at 326 (observing that what constitutes fair consideration must be determined on a case-by-case basis). The parties have stipulated that the conveyances from Diebold New York to petitioners were not made in exchange for any property or in satisfaction ofan antecedent debt. Thus, the transfers were not made in exchange
Fair consideration must be determined "upon the facts and circumstances of each particular case." Sullivan v. Messed (In re Corcoran), 246 B.R. 152, 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (citing United States v. McCombs, 30 F.3d at 326). Furthermore, under N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sec. 271 (McKinney 2001), a person is insolvent when the "present fair salable
142 (1940), the Board of Tax Appeals held that there was no suspension of the period of limitations upon assessment when the IRS sent a notice that was not proper under former section 272, the predecessor of section 6212, that had prompted the taxpayer to file a petition in a prior case.
142 (1940), the Board of Tax Appeals held that there was no suspension of the period of limitations upon assessment when the IRS sent a notice that was not proper under former section 272, the predecessor of section 6212, that had prompted the taxpayer to file a petition in a prior case.
Sections 274(g) and 512(g) were incorporated into the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 by section 272(g) (relating to the income tax) and section 1012(g) (relating to the gift tax); again no comparable section was included in the estate tax provisions of the 1939 Code.
Sections 274(g) and 512(g) were incorporated into the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 by section 272(g) (relating to the income tax) and section 1012(g) (relating to the gift tax); again no comparable section was included in the estate tax provisions of the 1939 Code.