§304 — Redemption through use of related corporations

75 cases·14 followed·11 distinguished·1 overruled·49 cited19% support

(a)Treatment of certain stock purchases
(1)Acquisition by related corporation (other than subsidiary)

For purposes of sections 302 and 303, if—

(A)

one or more persons are in control of each of two corporations, and

(B)

in return for property, one of the corporations acquires stock in the other corporation from the person (or persons) so in control,

then (unless paragraph (2) applies) such property shall be treated as a distribution in redemption of the stock of the corporation acquiring such stock. To the extent that such distribution is treated as a distribution to which section 301 applies, the transferor and the acquiring corporation shall be treated in the same manner as if the transferor had transferred the stock so acquired to the acquiring corporation in exchange for stock of the acquiring corporation in a transaction to which section 351(a) applies, and then the acquiring corporation had redeemed the stock it was treated as issuing in such transaction.

(2)Acquisition by subsidiary

For purposes of sections 302 and 303, if—

(A)

in return for property, one corporation acquires from a shareholder of another corporation stock in such other corporation, and

(B)

the issuing corporation controls the acquiring corporation,

then such property shall be treated as a distribution in redemption of the stock of the issuing corporation.

(b)Special rules for application of subsection (a)
(1)Rules for determinations under section 302(b)

In the case of any acquisition of stock to which subsection (a) of this section applies, determinations as to whether the acquisition is, by reason of section 302(b), to be treated as a distribution in part or full payment in exchange for the stock shall be made by reference to the stock of the issuing corporation. In applying section 318(a) (relating to constructive ownership of stock) with respect to section 302(b) for purposes of this paragraph, sections 318(a)(2)(C) and 318(a)(3)(C) shall be applied without regard to the 50 percent limitation contained therein.

(2)Amount constituting dividend

In the case of any acquisition of stock to which subsection (a) applies, the determination of the amount which is a dividend (and the source thereof) shall be made as if the property were distributed—

(A)

by the acquiring corporation to the extent of its earnings and profits, and

(B)

then by the issuing corporation to the extent of its earnings and profits.

(3)Coordination with section 351
(A)Property treated as received in redemption

Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, subsection (a) (and not section 351 and not so much of sections 357 and 358 as relates to section 351) shall apply to any property received in a distribution described in subsection (a).

(B)Certain assumptions of liability, etc.
(i)In general

In the case of an acquisition described in section 351, subsection (a) shall not apply to any liability—

(I)

assumed by the acquiring corporation, or

(II)

to which the stock is subject,

(ii)Extension of obligations, etc.

For purposes of clause (i), an extension, renewal, or refinancing of a liability which meets the requirements of clause (i) shall be treated as meeting such requirements.

(iii)Clause (i) does not apply to stock acquired from related person except where complete termination

Clause (i) shall apply only to stock acquired by the transferor from a person—

(I)

none of whose stock is attributable to the transferor under section 318(a) (other than paragraph (4) thereof), or

(II)

who satisfies rules similar to the rules of section 302(c)(2) with respect to both the acquiring and the issuing corporations (determined as if such person were a distributee of each such corporation).

if such liability was incurred by the transferor to acquire the stock. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term “stock” means stock referred to in paragraph (1)(B) or (2)(A) of subsection (a).

(C)Distributions incident to formation of bank holding companies

If—

(i)

pursuant to a plan, control of a bank is acquired and within 2 years after the date on which such control is acquired, stock constituting control of such bank is transferred to a BHC in connection with its formation,

(ii)

incident to the formation of the BHC there is a distribution of property described in subsection (a), and

(iii)

the shareholders of the BHC who receive distributions of such property do not have control of such BHC,

then, subsection (a) shall not apply to any securities received by a qualified minority shareholder incident to the formation of such BHC. For purposes of this subparagraph, any assumption of (or acquisition of stock subject to) a liability under subparagraph (B) shall not be treated as a distribution of property.

(D)Definitions

For purposes of subparagraph (C) and this subparagraph—

(i)Qualified minority shareholder

The term “qualified minority shareholder” means any shareholder who owns less than 10 percent (in value) of the stock of the BHC. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the rules of paragraph (3) of subsection (c) shall apply.

(ii)BHC

The term “BHC” means a bank holding company (within the meaning of section 2(a) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956).

(4)Treatment of certain intragroup transactions
(A)In general

In the case of any transfer described in subsection (a) of stock from 1 member of an affiliated group to another member of such group, proper adjustments shall be made to—

(i)

the adjusted basis of any intragroup stock, and

(ii)

the earnings and profits of any member of such group,

to the extent necessary to carry out the purposes of this section.

(B)Definitions

For purposes of this paragraph—

(i)Affiliated group

The term “affiliated group” has the meaning given such term by section 1504(a).

(ii)Intragroup stock

The term “intragroup stock” means any stock which—

(I)

is in a corporation which is a member of an affiliated group, and

(II)

is held by another member of such group.

(5)Acquisitions by foreign corporations
(A)In general

In the case of any acquisition to which subsection (a) applies in which the acquiring corporation is a foreign corporation, the only earnings and profits taken into account under paragraph (2)(A) shall be those earnings and profits—

(i)

which are attributable (under regulations prescribed by the Secretary) to stock of the acquiring corporation owned (within the meaning of section 958(a)) by a corporation or individual which is—

(I)

a United States shareholder (within the meaning of section 951(b)) of the acquiring corporation, and

(II)

the transferor or a person who bears a relationship to the transferor described in section 267(b) or 707(b), and

(ii)

which were accumulated during the period or periods such stock was owned by such person while the acquiring corporation was a controlled foreign corporation.

(B)Special rule in case of foreign acquiring corporation

In the case of any acquisition to which subsection (a) applies in which the acquiring corporation is a foreign corporation, no earnings and profits shall be taken into account under paragraph (2)(A) (and subparagraph (A) shall not apply) if more than 50 percent of the dividends arising from such acquisition (determined without regard to this subparagraph) would neither—

(i)

be subject to tax under this chapter for the taxable year in which the dividends arise, nor

(ii)

be includible in the earnings and profits of a controlled foreign corporation (as defined in section 957 and without regard to section 953(c)).

(C)Regulations

The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as are appropriate to carry out the purposes of this paragraph.

(6)Avoidance of multiple inclusions, etc.

In the case of any acquisition to which subsection (a) applies in which the acquiring corporation or the issuing corporation is a foreign corporation, the Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as are appropriate in order to eliminate a multiple inclusion of any item in income by reason of this subpart and to provide appropriate basis adjustments (including modifications to the application of sections 959 and 961).

(c)Control
(1)In general

For purposes of this section, control means the ownership of stock possessing at least 50 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote, or at least 50 percent of the total value of shares of all classes of stock. If a person (or persons) is in control (within the meaning of the preceding sentence) of a corporation which in turn owns at least 50 percent of the total combined voting power of all stock entitled to vote of another corporation, or owns at least 50 percent of the total value of the shares of all classes of stock of another corporation, then such person (or persons) shall be treated as in control of such other corporation.

(2)Stock acquired in the transaction

For purposes of subsection (a)(1)—

(A)General rule

Where 1 or more persons in control of the issuing corporation transfer stock of such corporation in exchange for stock of the acquiring corporation, the stock of the acquiring corporation received shall be taken into account in determining whether such person or persons are in control of the acquiring corporation.

(B)Definition of control group

Where 2 or more persons in control of the issuing corporation transfer stock of such corporation to the acquiring corporation and, after the transfer, the transferors are in control of the acquiring corporation, the person or persons in control of each corporation shall include each of the persons who so transfer stock.

(3)Constructive ownership
(A)In general

Section 318(a) (relating to constructive ownership of stock) shall apply for purposes of determining control under this section.

(B)Modification of 50-percent limitations in section 318

For purposes of subparagraph (A)—

(i)

paragraph (2)(C) of section 318(a) shall be applied by substituting “5 percent” for “50 percent”, and

(ii)

paragraph (3)(C) of section 318(a) shall be applied—

(I)

by substituting “5 percent” for “50 percent”, and

(II)

in any case where such paragraph would not apply but for subclause (I), by considering a corporation as owning the stock (other than stock in such corporation) owned by or for any shareholder of such corporation in that proportion which the value of the stock which such shareholder owned in such corporation bears to the value of all stock in such corporation.

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-1 General
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-1(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, section 304 is applicable where a shareholder sells stock of one corporation to a related corporation as defined in section 304.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-1(b) §1.304-1(b)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-2 Acquisition by related corporation (other than subsidiary)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-2(a) If a corporation, in return for property, acquires stock of another corporation from one or more persons, and the person or persons from whom the stock was acquired were in control of both such corporations before the acquisition, then such property shall be treated as received in redemption of stock of the acquiring corporation.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-2(b) In any case in which two or more persons, in the aggregate, control two corporations, section 304(a)(1) will apply to sales by such persons of stock in either corporation to the other (whether or not made simultaneously) provided the sales by each of such persons are related to each other.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-2(c) §1.304-2(c)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-3 Acquisition by a subsidiary
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-3(a) If a subsidiary acquires stock of its parent corporation from a shareholder of the parent corporation, the acquisition of such stock shall be treated as though the parent corporation had redeemed its own stock.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-3(b) §1.304-3(b)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-4 Special rules for the use of related corporations to avoid the application of section 304
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-4(a) Scope and purpose.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-4(b) Amount and source of dividend.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-4(c) Examples.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-4(d) Effective/applicability date.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-5 Control
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-5(a) Control requirement in general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-5(b) Effect of section 304(c)(2)(B)—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-5(c) Effective date.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-5(i) §1.304-5(i)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-7 Certain acquisitions by foreign acquiring corporations
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-7(a) Scope.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-7(b) Earnings and profits taken into account.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-7(c) Use of a partnership, option (or similar interest), or other arrangement.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.304-7(d) Examples.

75 Citing Cases

Applying section 304,' we held that the cross-chain sales qualified as redemptions in complete termination of the selling shareholder corporation's interest in the subsidiaries and must be taxed as distributions in exchange for stock.

- 24 - matter, increases in deficiency, and affirmative defenses, pleaded in the answer.” The difficulty for the Hursts is that we do distinguish between new matters and new theories--“we have held that for respondent to change the section of the Code on which he relies does not cause the assertion of the new theory to be new matter if the section relied on is consistent with the determination made in the deficiency notice relying on another section of the Code.” Barton v. Commissioner, T.C. Mem

The principal issue to be decided is the proper application of section 304, which could in turn require application of sections 301 and 302, to the facts of this case.

Combrink v. Commissioner 117 T.C. 82 · 2001

The principal issue to be decided is the proper application of section 304, which could in turn require application of sections 301 and 302, to the facts of this case.

Applying section 304, we held that the cross-chain sales qualified as redemptions in complete termination of the selling shareholder corporation’s interest in the subsidiaries and must be taxed as distributions in exchange for stock under section 302(a) and (b)(3) rather than as dividends under section 301.

Hurst v. Commissioner 124 T.C. 16 · 2005

Now the Commissioner urges us to rely on a different section of the Code — section 304 — to support his position on RHI.

The parties agree that the cross-chain sales qualified as section 304 redemptions that must be tested for dividend equivalency under section 302(b).

at 831. Congress added the flush text in 1997 when it revised section 408(m)(3) to add subparagraph (B) to allow IRAs to invest in bullion. Statutory interpretation begins with the text of the statute, and we may consider legislative intent when the text is ambiguous. CRI-Leslie, LLC v. Commissioner, 147 T.C. 217, 224 (2016), af

tion has been introduced on multiple occasions "[t]o provide a taxpayerbill ofrights for small businesses", S. 949, 114th Cong. (2015), and to insert into sec. 6343 a set ofcriteria for determining business economic hardship, H.R. 4128, 114th Cong., sec. 304 (2015); H.R. 4368, 112th Cong., sec. 1 (2012). None ofthese bills, however, was enacted. - 40 - On the basis ofsection 301.7122-1(b)(4), Proced. & Admin. Regs., and the analysis provided in the preamble, the Court finds this regulation's tre

nent part: The family members listed below must retain the lots for a period of five (5) years per the notarized and signed intrafamily trans- fer declaration of intent on file with planning and code enforce- ment and in accordance with article 26, section 304.1(9) and 4-103 (Bill 33-96) - 5 - Lot Name Relationship[3] Area 1 Megan O’Malley Granddaughter 2.00 acres 2 Thomas Galvin Stepson 2.09 acres 3 Dorothy O’Malley Galvin Self 2.43 acres 4 Patrick G.

891. - 5 - In 1971, under Arizona State law, the Central Arizona Water Conservation District (CAP Water District) was formed as a special water conservation district responsible for operation and maintenance of CAP and for repayment to the Interior Department of construction costs that the Federal Government would incur for cons

Kolonaki Imports, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1995-546 · 1995

from Kolonaki in 1989 and 1990 constituted loans or constructive dividends; whether a $100,000 home interest deduction claimed by - 3 - Georgiou in 1990 can be recharacterized as a business interest expense under section 163(a); whether ownership of JAI stock was transferred from Georgiou to Kolonaki during 1989 or 1990, creating a dividend under section 304; and whether Georgiou is liable for penalties under section 6662 for 1989 and 1990.

Georgiou Retail Stores, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1995-546 · 1995

from Kolonaki in 1989 and 1990 constituted loans or constructive dividends; whether a $100,000 home interest deduction claimed by - 3 - Georgiou in 1990 can be recharacterized as a business interest expense under section 163(a); whether ownership of JAI stock was transferred from Georgiou to Kolonaki during 1989 or 1990, creating a dividend under section 304; and whether Georgiou is liable for penalties under section 6662 for 1989 and 1990.

from Kolonaki in 1989 and 1990 constituted loans or constructive dividends; whether a $100,000 home interest deduction claimed by - 3 - Georgiou in 1990 can be recharacterized as a business interest expense under section 163(a); whether ownership of JAI stock was transferred from Georgiou to Kolonaki during 1989 or 1990, creating a dividend under section 304; and whether Georgiou is liable for penalties under section 6662 for 1989 and 1990.

Webb v. Commissioner 67 T.C. 293 · 1976
Bhada v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 959 · 1987
Cox v. Commissioner 78 T.C. 1021 · 1982
Maher v. Commissioner 55 T.C. 441 · 1970
Haserot v. Commissioner 46 T.C. 864 · 1966
Trianon Hotel Co. v. Commissioner 30 T.C. 156 · 1958
Ernst v. Roberts 379 F.3d 373 · Cir.
Gunther v. Commissioner 92 T.C. 39 · 1989
Paparo v. Commissioner 71 T.C. 692 · 1979
Fehrs Finance Co. v. Commissioner 58 T.C. 174 · 1972
Haserot v. Commissioner 41 T.C. 562 · 1964
Ernst v. Roberts 379 F.3d 373 · Cir.
Citizens Coal v. EPA · Cir.
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 386 F.3d 464 · Cir.
Citizens Coal Council and Kentucky Resources Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency 447 F.3d 879 · Cir.
Hitchins v. Commissioner 103 T.C. 711 · 1994
Estate of Egger v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 726 · 1987
Keating v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 1071 · 1987
Reeves v. Commissioner 71 T.C. 727 · 1979
Niedermeyer v. Commissioner 62 T.C. 280 · 1974
Yoc Heating Corp. v. Commissioner 61 T.C. 168 · 1973
Kamborian v. Commissioner 56 T.C. 847 · 1971
Wilson v. Commissioner 46 T.C. 334 · 1966
Curry v. Commissioner 43 T.C. 667 · 1965
Swan v. Commissioner 42 T.C. 291 · 1964
Moffatt v. Commissioner 42 T.C. 558 · 1964
Estate of Schmidt v. Commissioner 42 T.C. 1130 · 1964
Denniston v. Commissioner 41 T.C. 667 · 1964
Sorem v. Commissioner 40 T.C. 206 · 1963
Russell v. Commissioner 40 T.C. 810 · 1963
Grubbs v. Commissioner 39 T.C. 42 · 1962
Humphrey v. Commissioner 39 T.C. 199 · 1962
Merrimac Hat Corp. v. Commissioner 32 T.C. 1082 · 1959
Lewyt Corp. v. Commissioner 18 T.C. 1245 · 1952
Stringham v. Commissioner 12 T.C. 580 · 1949
Estate of Curie v. Commissioner 4 T.C. 1175 · 1945
Doriss v. Commissioner 3 T.C. 219 · 1944
Estate of Wilson v. Commissioner 2 T.C. 1059 · 1943
Spookyworld, Inc. v. Town of Berlin 346 F.3d 1 · Cir.
Owner Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Comerica Bank (In Re Arctic Express Inc.) 636 F.3d 781 · Cir.
Associated Builders & Contractors Inc. v. City of Jersey City 836 F.3d 412 · Cir.
Island Fork Construction v. Jimmy Bowling 872 F.3d 754 · Cir.
Karst Robbins Coal Co. v. OWCP 969 F.3d 316 · Cir.
Dotson v. Griesa 398 F.3d 156 · Cir.
Dotson v. Griesa 398 F.3d 156 · Cir.
Owner Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Comerica Bank 636 F.3d 781 · Cir.