§332 — Complete liquidations of subsidiaries
126 citing cases
Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §332
No gain or loss shall be recognized on the receipt by a corporation of property distributed in complete liquidation of another corporation.
For purposes of this section, a distribution shall be considered to be in complete liquidation only if—
the corporation receiving such property was, on the date of the adoption of the plan of liquidation, and has continued to be at all times until the receipt of the property, the owner of stock (in such other corporation) meeting the requirements of section 1504(a)(2); and either
the distribution is by such other corporation in complete cancellation or redemption of all its stock, and the transfer of all the property occurs within the taxable year; in such case the adoption by the shareholders of the resolution under which is authorized the distribution of all the assets of such corporation in complete cancellation or redemption of all its stock shall be considered an adoption of a plan of liquidation, even though no time for the completion of the transfer of the property is specified in such resolution; or
such distribution is one of a series of distributions by such other corporation in complete cancellation or redemption of all its stock in accordance with a plan of liquidation under which the transfer of all the property under the liquidation is to be completed within 3 years from the close of the taxable year during which is made the first of the series of distributions under the plan, except that if such transfer is not completed within such period, or if the taxpayer does not continue qualified under paragraph (1) until the completion of such transfer, no distribution under the plan shall be considered a distribution in complete liquidation.
If such transfer of all the property does not occur within the taxable year, the Secretary may require of the taxpayer such bond, or waiver of the statute of limitations on assessment and collection, or both, as he may deem necessary to insure, if the transfer of the property is not completed within such 3-year period, or if the taxpayer does not continue qualified under paragraph (1) until the completion of such transfer, the assessment and collection of all income taxes then imposed by law for such taxable year or subsequent taxable years, to the extent attributable to property so received. A distribution otherwise constituting a distribution in complete liquidation within the meaning of this subsection shall not be considered as not constituting such a distribution merely because it does not constitute a distribution or liquidation within the meaning of the corporate law under which the distribution is made; and for purposes of this subsection a transfer of property of such other corporation to the taxpayer shall not be considered as not constituting a distribution (or one of a series of distributions) in complete cancellation or redemption of all the stock of such other corporation, merely because the carrying out of the plan involves (A) the transfer under the plan to the taxpayer by such other corporation of property, not attributable to shares owned by the taxpayer, on an exchange described in section 361, and (B) the complete cancellation or redemption under the plan, as a result of exchanges described in section 354, of the shares not owned by the taxpayer.
If a corporation receives a distribution from a regulated investment company or a real estate investment trust which is considered under subsection (b) as being in complete liquidation of such company or trust, then, notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, such corporation shall recognize and treat as a dividend from such company or trust an amount equal to the deduction for dividends paid allowable to such company or trust by reason of such distribution.
In the case of any distribution to a foreign corporation in complete liquidation of an applicable holding company—
subsection (a) and section 331 shall not apply to such distribution, and
such distribution shall be treated as a distribution of property to which section 301 applies.
For purposes of this subsection:
The term “applicable holding company” means any domestic corporation—
which is a common parent of an affiliated group,
stock of which is directly owned by the distributee foreign corporation,
substantially all of the assets of which consist of stock in other members of such affiliated group, and
which has not been in existence at all times during the 5 years immediately preceding the date of the liquidation.
For purposes of this subsection, the term “affiliated group” has the meaning given such term by section 1504(a) (without regard to paragraph (2) of section 1504(b)).
If the distributee of a distribution described in paragraph (1) is a controlled foreign corporation (as defined in section 957), then notwithstanding paragraph (1) or subsection (a), such distribution shall be treated as a distribution to which section 331 applies.
The Secretary shall provide such regulations as appropriate to prevent the abuse of this subsection, including regulations which provide, for the purposes of clause (iv) of paragraph (2)(A), that a corporation is not in existence for any period unless it is engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business or owns a significant ownership interest in another corporation so engaged.
Treasury Regulations
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-1Distributions in liquidation of subsidiary corporation; general
Under the general rule prescribed by section 331 for the treatment of distributions in liquidation of a corporation, amounts received by one corporation in complete liquidation of another corporation are treated as in full payment in exchange for stock in such other corporation, and gain or loss from the receipt of such amounts is to be determined as provided in section 1001. Section 332 excepts from the general rule property received, under certain specifically described circumstances, by one corporation as a distribution in complete liquidation of the stock of another corporation and provides for the nonrecognition of gain or loss in those cases which meet the statutory requirements. Section 367 places a limitation on the application of section 332 in the case of foreign corporations. See section 334(b) for the basis for determining gain or loss from the subsequent sale of property received upon complete liquidations such as described in this section. See section 453(d)(4)(A) relative to distribution of installment obligations by subsidiary.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-2Requirements for nonrecognition of gain or loss
(a) The nonrecognition of gain or loss under section 332 is limited to the receipt of property by a corporation that is the actual owner of stock (in the liquidating corporation) meeting the requirements of section 1504(a)(2). The recipient corporation must have been the owner of the specified amount of such stock on the date of the adoption of the plan of liquidation and have continued so to be at all times until the receipt of the property. If the recipient corporation does not continue qualified with respect to the ownership of stock of the liquidating corporation and if the failure to continue qualified occurs at any time prior to the completion of the transfer of all the property, the provisions for the nonrecognition of gain or loss do not apply to any distribution received under the plan.
(b) Section 332 applies only to those cases in which the recipient corporation receives at least partial payment for the stock which it owns in the liquidating corporation. If section 332 is not applicable, see section 165(g) relative to allowance of losses on worthless securities.
(c) To constitute a distribution in complete liquidation within the meaning of section 332, the distribution must be (1) made by the liquidating corporation in complete cancellation or redemption of all of its stock in accordance with a plan of liquidation, or (2) one of a series of distributions in complete cancellation or redemption of all its stock in accordance with a plan of liquidation. Where there is more than one distribution, it is essential that a status of liquidation exist at the time the first distribution is made under the plan and that such status continue until the liquidation is completed. Liquidation is completed when the liquidating corporation and the receiver or trustees in liquidation are finally divested of all the property (both tangible and intangible). A status of liquidation exists when the corporation ceases to be a going concern and its activities are merely for the purpose of winding up its affairs, paying its debts, and distributing any remaining balance to its shareholders. A liquidation may be completed prior to the actual dissolution of the liquidating corporation. However, legal dissolution of the corporation is not required. Nor will the mere retention of a nominal amount of assets for the sole purpose of preserving the corporation's legal existence disqualify the transaction. (See 26 CFR (1939) 39.22(a)-20 (Regulations 118).)
(d) If a transaction constitutes a distribution in complete liquidation within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and satisfies the requirements of section 332, it is not material that it is otherwise described under the local law. If a liquidating corporation distributes all of its property in complete liquidation and if pursuant to the plan for such complete liquidation a corporation owning the specified amount of stock in the liquidating corporation receives property constituting amounts distributed in complete liquidation within the meaning of the Code and also receives other property attributable to shares not owned by it, the transfer of the property to the recipient corporation shall not be treated, by reason of the receipt of such other property, as not being a distribution (or one of a series of distributions) in complete cancellation or redemption of all of the stock of the liquidating corporation within the meaning of section 332, even though for purposes of those provisions relating to corporate reorganizations the amount received by the recipient corporation in excess of its ratable share is regarded as acquired upon the issuance of its stock or securities in a tax-free exchange as described in section 361 and the cancellation or redemption of the stock not owned by the recipient corporation is treated as occurring as a result of a taxfree exchange described in section 354.
(e) The application of these rules may be illustrated by the following example:
(f) Applicability date. The first sentence of paragraph (a) of this section applies to plans of complete liquidation adopted after March 28, 1985, except as specified in section 1804(e)(6)(B)(ii) and (iii) of Public Law 99-514.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-2(a)The nonrecognition of gain or loss under section 332 is limited to the receipt of property by a corporation that is the actual owner of stock (in the liquidating corporation) meeting the requirements of section 1504(a)(2).
The nonrecognition of gain or loss under section 332 is limited to the receipt of property by a corporation that is the actual owner of stock (in the liquidating corporation) meeting the requirements of section 1504(a)(2). The recipient corporation must have been the owner of the specified amount of such stock on the date of the adoption of the plan of liquidation and have continued so to be at all times until the receipt of the property. If the recipient corporation does not continue qualified with respect to the ownership of stock of the liquidating corporation and if the failure to continue qualified occurs at any time prior to the completion of the transfer of all the property, the provisions for the nonrecognition of gain or loss do not apply to any distribution received under the plan.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-2(b)Section 332 applies only to those cases in which the recipient corporation receives at least partial payment for the stock which it owns in the liquidating corporation.
Section 332 applies only to those cases in which the recipient corporation receives at least partial payment for the stock which it owns in the liquidating corporation. If section 332 is not applicable, see section 165(g) relative to allowance of losses on worthless securities.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-2(c)To constitute a distribution in complete liquidation within the meaning of section 332, the distribution must be (1) made by the liquidating corporation in complete cancellation or redemption of all of its stock in accordance with a plan of liquidation, or (2) one of a series of distributions in complete cancellation or redemption of all its stock in accordance with a plan of liquidation.
To constitute a distribution in complete liquidation within the meaning of section 332, the distribution must be (1) made by the liquidating corporation in complete cancellation or redemption of all of its stock in accordance with a plan of liquidation, or (2) one of a series of distributions in complete cancellation or redemption of all its stock in accordance with a plan of liquidation. Where there is more than one distribution, it is essential that a status of liquidation exist at the time the first distribution is made under the plan and that such status continue until the liquidation is completed. Liquidation is completed when the liquidating corporation and the receiver or trustees in liquidation are finally divested of all the property (both tangible and intangible). A status of liquidation exists when the corporation ceases to be a going concern and its activities are merely for the purpose of winding up its affairs, paying its debts, and distributing any remaining balance to its shareholders. A liquidation may be completed prior to the actual dissolution of the liquidating corporation. However, legal dissolution of the corporation is not required. Nor will the mere retention of a nominal amount of assets for the sole purpose of preserving the corporation's legal existence disqualify the transaction. (See 26 CFR (1939) 39.22(a)-20 (Regulations 118).)
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-2(d)If a transaction constitutes a distribution in complete liquidation within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and satisfies the requirements of section 332, it is not material that it is otherwise described under the local law.
If a transaction constitutes a distribution in complete liquidation within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and satisfies the requirements of section 332, it is not material that it is otherwise described under the local law. If a liquidating corporation distributes all of its property in complete liquidation and if pursuant to the plan for such complete liquidation a corporation owning the specified amount of stock in the liquidating corporation receives property constituting amounts distributed in complete liquidation within the meaning of the Code and also receives other property attributable to shares not owned by it, the transfer of the property to the recipient corporation shall not be treated, by reason of the receipt of such other property, as not being a distribution (or one of a series of distributions) in complete cancellation or redemption of all of the stock of the liquidating corporation within the meaning of section 332, even though for purposes of those provisions relating to corporate reorganizations the amount received by the recipient corporation in excess of its ratable share is regarded as acquired upon the issuance of its stock or securities in a tax-free exchange as described in section 361 and the cancellation or redemption of the stock not owned by the recipient corporation is treated as occurring as a result of a taxfree exchange described in section 354.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-2(e)§1.332-2(e)
The application of these rules may be illustrated by the following example:
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-2(f)Applicability date.
Applicability date. The first sentence of paragraph (a) of this section applies to plans of complete liquidation adopted after March 28, 1985, except as specified in section 1804(e)(6)(B)(ii) and (iii) of Public Law 99-514.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-3Liquidations completed within one taxable year
If in a liquidation completed within one taxable year pursuant to a plan of complete liquidation, distributions in complete liquidation are received by a corporation which owns the specified amount of stock in the liquidating corporation and which continues qualified with respect to the ownership of such stock until the transfer of all the property within such year is completed (see paragraph (a) of § 1.332-2), then no gain or loss shall be recognized with respect to the distributions received by the recipient corporation. In such case no waiver or bond is required of the recipient corporation under section 332.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-4Liquidations covering more than one taxable year
(a) If the plan of liquidation is consummated by a series of distributions extending over a period of more than one taxable year, the nonrecognition of gain or loss with respect to the distributions in liquidation shall, in addition to the requirements of § 1.332-2, be subject to the following requirements:
(1) In order for the distribution in liquidation to be brought within the exception provided in section 332 to the general rule for computing gain or loss with respect to amounts received in liquidation of a corporation, the entire property of the corporation shall be transferred in accordance with a plan of liquidation, which plan shall include a statement showing the period within which the transfer of the property of the liquidating corporation to the recipient corporation is to be completed. The transfer of all the property under the liquidation must be completed within three years from the close of the taxable year during which is made the first of the series of distributions under the plan.
(2) For each of the taxable years which falls wholly or partly within the period of liquidation, the recipient corporation shall, at the time of filing its return, file with the district director of internal revenue a waiver of the statute of limitations on assessment. The waiver shall be executed on such form as may be prescribed by the Commissioner and shall extend the period of assessment of all income and profits taxes for each such year to a date not earlier than one year after the last date of the period for assessment of such taxes for the last taxable year in which the transfer of the property of such liquidating corporation to the controlling corporation may be completed in accordance with section 332. Such waiver shall also contain such other terms with respect to assessment as may be considered by the Commissioner to be necessary to insure the assessment and collection of the correct tax liability for each year within the period of liquidation.
(3) For each of the taxable years which falls wholly or partly within the period of liquidation, the recipient corporation may be required to file a bond, the amount of which shall be fixed by the district director. The bond shall contain all terms specified by the Commissioner, including provisions unequivocally assuring prompt payment of the excess of income and profits taxes (plus penalty, if any, and interest) as computed by the district director without regard to the provisions of sections 332 and 334(b) over such taxes computed with regard to such provisions, regardless of whether such excess may or may not be made the subject of a notice of deficiency under section 6212 and regardless of whether it may or may not be assessed. Any bond required under section 332 shall have such surety or sureties as the Commissioner may require. However, see 6 U.S.C. 15, providing that where a bond is required by law or regulations, in lieu of surety or sureties there may be deposited bonds or notes of the United States. Only surety companies holding certificates of authority from the Secretary as acceptable sureties on Federal bonds will be approved as sureties. The bonds shall be executed in triplicate so that the Commissioner, the taxpayer, and the surety or the depositary may each have a copy. On and after September 1, 1953, the functions of the Commissioner with respect to such bonds shall be performed by the district director for the internal revenue district in which the return was filed and any bond filed on or after such date shall be filed with such district director.
(b) Pending the completion of the liquidation, if there is a compliance with paragraph (a) (1), (2), and (3) of this section and § 1.332-2 with respect to the nonrecognition of gain or loss, the income and profits tax liability of the recipient corporation for each of the years covered in whole or in part by the liquidation shall be determined without the recognition of any gain or loss on account of the receipt of the distributions in liquidation. In such determination, the basis of the property or properties received by the recipient corporation shall be determined in accordance with section 334(b). However, if the transfer of the property is not completed within the three-year period allowed by section 332 or if the recipient corporation does not continue qualified with respect to the ownership of stock of the liquidating corporation as required by that section, gain or loss shall be recognized with respect to each distribution and the tax liability for each of the years covered in whole or in part by the liquidation shall be recomputed without regard to the provisions of section 332 or section 334(b) and the amount of any additional tax due upon such recomputation shall be promptly paid.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-4(a)If the plan of liquidation is consummated by a series of distributions extending over a period of more than one taxable year, the nonrecognition of gain or loss with respect to the distributions in liquidation shall, in addition to the requirements of § 1.
If the plan of liquidation is consummated by a series of distributions extending over a period of more than one taxable year, the nonrecognition of gain or loss with respect to the distributions in liquidation shall, in addition to the requirements of § 1.332-2, be subject to the following requirements:
(1) In order for the distribution in liquidation to be brought within the exception provided in section 332 to the general rule for computing gain or loss with respect to amounts received in liquidation of a corporation, the entire property of the corporation shall be transferred in accordance with a plan of liquidation, which plan shall include a statement showing the period within which the transfer of the property of the liquidating corporation to the recipient corporation is to be completed. The transfer of all the property under the liquidation must be completed within three years from the close of the taxable year during which is made the first of the series of distributions under the plan.
(2) For each of the taxable years which falls wholly or partly within the period of liquidation, the recipient corporation shall, at the time of filing its return, file with the district director of internal revenue a waiver of the statute of limitations on assessment. The waiver shall be executed on such form as may be prescribed by the Commissioner and shall extend the period of assessment of all income and profits taxes for each such year to a date not earlier than one year after the last date of the period for assessment of such taxes for the last taxable year in which the transfer of the property of such liquidating corporation to the controlling corporation may be completed in accordance with section 332. Such waiver shall also contain such other terms with respect to assessment as may be considered by the Commissioner to be necessary to insure the assessment and collection of the correct tax liability for each year within the period of liquidation.
(3) For each of the taxable years which falls wholly or partly within the period of liquidation, the recipient corporation may be required to file a bond, the amount of which shall be fixed by the district director. The bond shall contain all terms specified by the Commissioner, including provisions unequivocally assuring prompt payment of the excess of income and profits taxes (plus penalty, if any, and interest) as computed by the district director without regard to the provisions of sections 332 and 334(b) over such taxes computed with regard to such provisions, regardless of whether such excess may or may not be made the subject of a notice of deficiency under section 6212 and regardless of whether it may or may not be assessed. Any bond required under section 332 shall have such surety or sureties as the Commissioner may require. However, see 6 U.S.C. 15, providing that where a bond is required by law or regulations, in lieu of surety or sureties there may be deposited bonds or notes of the United States. Only surety companies holding certificates of authority from the Secretary as acceptable sureties on Federal bonds will be approved as sureties. The bonds shall be executed in triplicate so that the Commissioner, the taxpayer, and the surety or the depositary may each have a copy. On and after September 1, 1953, the functions of the Commissioner with respect to such bonds shall be performed by the district director for the internal revenue district in which the return was filed and any bond filed on or after such date shall be filed with such district director.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-4(b)Pending the completion of the liquidation, if there is a compliance with paragraph (a) (1), (2), and (3) of this section and § 1.
Pending the completion of the liquidation, if there is a compliance with paragraph (a) (1), (2), and (3) of this section and § 1.332-2 with respect to the nonrecognition of gain or loss, the income and profits tax liability of the recipient corporation for each of the years covered in whole or in part by the liquidation shall be determined without the recognition of any gain or loss on account of the receipt of the distributions in liquidation. In such determination, the basis of the property or properties received by the recipient corporation shall be determined in accordance with section 334(b). However, if the transfer of the property is not completed within the three-year period allowed by section 332 or if the recipient corporation does not continue qualified with respect to the ownership of stock of the liquidating corporation as required by that section, gain or loss shall be recognized with respect to each distribution and the tax liability for each of the years covered in whole or in part by the liquidation shall be recomputed without regard to the provisions of section 332 or section 334(b) and the amount of any additional tax due upon such recomputation shall be promptly paid.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-5Distributions in liquidation as affecting minority interests
Upon the liquidation of a corporation in pursuance of a plan of complete liquidation, the gain or loss of minority shareholders shall be determined without regard to section 332, since it does not apply to that part of distributions in liquidation received by minority shareholders.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-6Records to be kept and information to be filed with return
(a) Statement filed by recipient corporation. If any recipient corporation received a liquidating distribution from the liquidating corporation pursuant to a plan (whether or not that recipient corporation has received or will receive other such distributions from the liquidating corporation in other tax years as part of the same plan) during the current tax year, such recipient corporation must include a statement entitled, “STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 332 BY [INSERT NAME AND EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (IF ANY) OF TAXPAYER], A CORPORATION RECEIVING A LIQUIDATING DISTRIBUTION,” on or with its return for such year. If any recipient corporation is a controlled foreign corporation (within the meaning of section 957), each United States shareholder (within the meaning of section 951(b)) with respect thereto must include this statement on or with its return. The statement must include—
(1) The name and employer identification number (if any) of the liquidating corporation;
(2) The date(s) of all distribution(s) (whether or not pursuant to the plan) by the liquidating corporation during the current tax year;
(3) The fair market value and basis of assets of the liquidating corporation that have been or will be transferred to any recipient corporation, aggregated as follows:
(i) Importation property distributed in a loss importation transaction, as defined in § 1.362-3(c)(2) and (3) (except that “section 332 liquidation” is substituted for “section 362 transaction”), respectively;
(ii) Property with respect to which gain or loss was recognized on the distribution;
(iii) Property not described in paragraph (a)(3)(i) or (ii) of this section;
(4) The date and control number of any private letter ruling(s) issued by the Internal Revenue Service in connection with the liquidation;
(5) The following representation: THE PLAN OF COMPLETE LIQUIDATION WAS ADOPTED ON [INSERT DATE (mm/dd/yyyy)]; and
(6) A representation by such recipient corporation either that—
(i) THE LIQUIDATION WAS COMPLETED ON [INSERT DATE (mm/dd/yyyy)]; or
(ii) THE LIQUIDATION IS NOT COMPLETE AND THE TAXPAYER HAS TIMELY FILED [INSERT EITHER FORM 952, “Consent To Extend the Time to Assess Tax Under Section 332(b),” OR NUMBER AND NAME OF THE SUCCESSOR FORM].
(b) Filings by the liquidating corporation. The liquidating corporation must timely file Form 966, “Corporate Dissolution or Liquidation,” (or its successor form) and its final Federal corporate income tax return. See also section 6043 of the Code.
(c) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
(1) Plan means the plan of complete liquidation within the meaning of section 332.
(2) Recipient corporation means the corporation described in section 332(b)(1).
(3) Liquidating corporation means the corporation that makes a distribution of property to a recipient corporation pursuant to the plan.
(4) Liquidating distribution means a distribution of property made by the liquidating corporation to a recipient corporation pursuant to the plan.
(d) Substantiation information. Under § 1.6001-1(e), taxpayers are required to retain their permanent records and make such records available to any authorized Internal Revenue Service officers and employees. In connection with a liquidation described in this section, these records should specifically include information regarding the amount, basis, and fair market value of all distributed property, and relevant facts regarding any liabilities assumed or extinguished as part of such liquidation.
(e) Effective/applicability date. This section applies to any taxable year beginning on or after May 30, 2006. However, taxpayers may apply this section to any original Federal income tax return (including any amended return filed on or before the due date (including extensions) of such original return) timely filed on or after May 30, 2006. For taxable years beginning before May 30, 2006, see § 1.332-6 as contained in 26 CFR part 1 in effect on April 1, 2006. Paragraph (a)(3) of this section applies with respect to liquidations under section 332 occurring on or after March 28, 2016, and also with respect to liquidations under section 332 occurring before such date as a result of an entity classification election under § 301.7701-3 of this chapter filed on or after March 28, 2016, unless such liquidation is pursuant to a binding agreement that was in effect prior to March 28, 2016 and at all times thereafter.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-6(a)Statement filed by recipient corporation.
Statement filed by recipient corporation. If any recipient corporation received a liquidating distribution from the liquidating corporation pursuant to a plan (whether or not that recipient corporation has received or will receive other such distributions from the liquidating corporation in other tax years as part of the same plan) during the current tax year, such recipient corporation must include a statement entitled, “STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 332 BY [INSERT NAME AND EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (IF ANY) OF TAXPAYER], A CORPORATION RECEIVING A LIQUIDATING DISTRIBUTION,” on or with its return for such year. If any recipient corporation is a controlled foreign corporation (within the meaning of section 957), each United States shareholder (within the meaning of section 951(b)) with respect thereto must include this statement on or with its return. The statement must include—
(1) The name and employer identification number (if any) of the liquidating corporation;
(2) The date(s) of all distribution(s) (whether or not pursuant to the plan) by the liquidating corporation during the current tax year;
(3) The fair market value and basis of assets of the liquidating corporation that have been or will be transferred to any recipient corporation, aggregated as follows:
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-6(b)Filings by the liquidating corporation.
Filings by the liquidating corporation. The liquidating corporation must timely file Form 966, “Corporate Dissolution or Liquidation,” (or its successor form) and its final Federal corporate income tax return. See also section 6043 of the Code.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-6(c)Definitions.
Definitions. For purposes of this section:
(1) Plan means the plan of complete liquidation within the meaning of section 332.
(2) Recipient corporation means the corporation described in section 332(b)(1).
(3) Liquidating corporation means the corporation that makes a distribution of property to a recipient corporation pursuant to the plan.
(4) Liquidating distribution means a distribution of property made by the liquidating corporation to a recipient corporation pursuant to the plan.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-6(d)Substantiation information.
Substantiation information. Under § 1.6001-1(e), taxpayers are required to retain their permanent records and make such records available to any authorized Internal Revenue Service officers and employees. In connection with a liquidation described in this section, these records should specifically include information regarding the amount, basis, and fair market value of all distributed property, and relevant facts regarding any liabilities assumed or extinguished as part of such liquidation.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-6(e)Effective/applicability date.
Effective/applicability date. This section applies to any taxable year beginning on or after May 30, 2006. However, taxpayers may apply this section to any original Federal income tax return (including any amended return filed on or before the due date (including extensions) of such original return) timely filed on or after May 30, 2006. For taxable years beginning before May 30, 2006, see § 1.332-6 as contained in 26 CFR part 1 in effect on April 1, 2006. Paragraph (a)(3) of this section applies with respect to liquidations under section 332 occurring on or after March 28, 2016, and also with respect to liquidations under section 332 occurring before such date as a result of an entity classification election under § 301.7701-3 of this chapter filed on or after March 28, 2016, unless such liquidation is pursuant to a binding agreement that was in effect prior to March 28, 2016 and at all times thereafter.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-6(i)§1.332-6(i)
THE LIQUIDATION WAS COMPLETED ON [INSERT DATE (mm/dd/yyyy)]; or
(ii) THE LIQUIDATION IS NOT COMPLETE AND THE TAXPAYER HAS TIMELY FILED [INSERT EITHER FORM 952, “Consent To Extend the Time to Assess Tax Under Section 332(b),” OR NUMBER AND NAME OF THE SUCCESSOR FORM].
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-7Indebtedness of subsidiary to parent
If section 332(a) is applicable to the receipt of the subsidiary's property in complete liquidation, then no gain or loss shall be recognized to the subsidiary upon the transfer of such properties even though some of the properties are transferred in satisfaction of the subsidiary's indebtedness to its parent. See section 337(b)(1). However, any gain or loss realized by the parent corporation on such satisfaction of indebtedness, shall be recognized to the parent corporation at the time of the liquidation. For example, if the parent corporation purchased its subsidiary's bonds at a discount and upon liquidation of the subsidiary the parent corporation receives payment for the face amount of such bonds, gain shall be recognized to the parent corporation. Such gain shall be measured by the difference between the cost or other basis of the bonds to the parent and the amount received in payment of the bonds.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-8Recognition of gain on liquidation of certain holding companies
(a) Definition of controlled foreign corporation. For purposes of section 332(d)(3), a controlled foreign corporation has the meaning provided in section 957, determined without applying section 318(a)(3)(A), (B), and (C) so as to consider a United States person as owning stock which is owned by a person who is not a United States person.
(b) Applicability date. This section applies to distributions in complete liquidation occurring on or after October 1, 2019, and to distributions in complete liquidation occurring before October 1, 2019, that result from an entity classification election made under § 301.7701-3 of this chapter that is filed on or after October 1, 2019. For distributions in complete liquidation occurring before October 1, 2019, other than distributions in complete liquidation occurring before October 1, 2019, that result from an entity classification election made under § 301.7701-3 of this chapter that is filed on or after October 1, 2019, a taxpayer may apply this section to distributions in complete liquidation occurring during the last taxable year of a distributee foreign corporation beginning before January 1, 2018, and each subsequent taxable year of the foreign corporation, provided that the taxpayer and United States persons that are related (within the meaning of section 267 or 707) to the taxpayer consistently apply this section with respect to all foreign corporations.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-8(a)Definition of controlled foreign corporation.
Definition of controlled foreign corporation. For purposes of section 332(d)(3), a controlled foreign corporation has the meaning provided in section 957, determined without applying section 318(a)(3)(A), (B), and (C) so as to consider a United States person as owning stock which is owned by a person who is not a United States person.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.332-8(b)Applicability date.
Applicability date. This section applies to distributions in complete liquidation occurring on or after October 1, 2019, and to distributions in complete liquidation occurring before October 1, 2019, that result from an entity classification election made under § 301.7701-3 of this chapter that is filed on or after October 1, 2019. For distributions in complete liquidation occurring before October 1, 2019, other than distributions in complete liquidation occurring before October 1, 2019, that result from an entity classification election made under § 301.7701-3 of this chapter that is filed on or after October 1, 2019, a taxpayer may apply this section to distributions in complete liquidation occurring during the last taxable year of a distributee foreign corporation beginning before January 1, 2018, and each subsequent taxable year of the foreign corporation, provided that the taxpayer and United States persons that are related (within the meaning of section 267 or 707) to the taxpayer consistently apply this section with respect to all foreign corporations.
126 Citing Cases
Instead, because petitioner’s election to be disregarded resulted in a reorganization described in section 368(a)(1)(F), the construct that would otherwise have been supplied by the entity classification regulations is superseded by a construct necessary to apply to the reorganization the operative nonrecognition provisions of sections 354 and 361.
on May 31, 2001, SCC had merged into an ICA affiliated entity named Shockley Delaware Corp. (SDC) and that immediately thereafter SDC converted into a Delaware limited liability company resulting in SCC's liquidation and tax-free distribution under section 332. On February 18, 2005, the IRS issued multiple notices ofdeficiency relating to SCC's short tax year ended May 31, 2001. On May 25, 2005, the Shockleys filed a petition in response to the notice that was sent to them at their then home -
on May 31, 2001, SCC had merged into an ICA affiliated entity named Shockley Delaware Corp. (SDC) and that immediately thereafter SDC converted into a Delaware limited liability company resulting in SCC's liquidation and tax-free distribution under section 332. On February 18, 2005, the IRS issued multiple notices ofdeficiency relating to SCC's short tax year ended May 31, 2001. On May 25, 2005, the Shockleys filed a petition in response to the notice that was sent to them at their then home -
on May 31, 2001, SCC had merged into an ICA affiliated entity named Shockley Delaware Corp. (SDC) and that immediately thereafter SDC converted into a Delaware limited liability company resulting in SCC's liquidation and tax-free distribution under section 332. On February 18, 2005, the IRS issued multiple notices ofdeficiency relating to SCC's short tax year ended May 31, 2001. On May 25, 2005, the Shockleys filed a petition in response to the notice that was sent to them at their then home -
on May 31, 2001, SCC had merged into an ICA affiliated entity named Shockley Delaware Corp. (SDC) and that immediately thereafter SDC converted into a Delaware limited liability company resulting in SCC's liquidation and tax-free distribution under section 332. On February 18, 2005, the IRS issued multiple notices ofdeficiency relating to SCC's short tax year ended May 31, 2001. On May 25, 2005, the Shockleys filed a petition in response to the notice that was sent to them at their then home -
89. 5 The specific issue before the Court in Spaulding Bakeries, Inc. v. Commissioner, 27 T.C. 684 (1957), M, 252 F.2d 693 (2d Cir. 1958), was whether the nonrecognition rule in sec. 112(b)(6) ofthe Internal Revenue Code of 1939, the predecessor to sec. 332, applied to bar the taxpayer, a corporation, from claiming the worthless stock deduction. That rule prevents a corporation from recognizing gain or loss upon receipt ofproperty distributed in complete liquidation ofanother corporation, under
Tucker structured the transaction to take advantage ofthe section 332 nonrecognition rule for corporate shareholders and avoided recognizing gain from the deemed liquidation upon Epsolon's partnership election.
its 2001 tax year and zero tax due. It also reported that on May 31, 2001, SCC had merged into SDC and that immediately thereafter SDC converted into a Delaware limited liability company resulting in SCC's liquidation and tax-free distribution under section 332. - 24 - [*24] On February 18, 2005, the IRS issued multiple notices ofdeficiency relating to SCC's short tax year ended May 31, 2001. On May 25, 2005, the Shockleys filed a petition in response to the notice that was sent to them at their
its 2001 tax year and zero tax due. It also reported that on May 31, 2001, SCC had merged into SDC and that immediately thereafter SDC converted into a Delaware limited liability company resulting in SCC's liquidation and tax-free distribution under section 332. - 24 - [*24] On February 18, 2005, the IRS issued multiple notices ofdeficiency relating to SCC's short tax year ended May 31, 2001. On May 25, 2005, the Shockleys filed a petition in response to the notice that was sent to them at their
its 2001 tax year and zero tax due. It also reported that on May 31, 2001, SCC had merged into SDC and that immediately thereafter SDC converted into a Delaware limited liability company resulting in SCC's liquidation and tax-free distribution under section 332. - 24 - [*24] On February 18, 2005, the IRS issued multiple notices ofdeficiency relating to SCC's short tax year ended May 31, 2001. On May 25, 2005, the Shockleys filed a petition in response to the notice that was sent to them at their
When WRIC made the Qsub election, WRIC engaged in a deemed liquidation ofAIS -19- [*19] pursuant to section 332 because WRIC held more than 80% ofthe vote and value ofAIS.
After concessions the issue remaining for our consideration is whether petitioners properly increased their adjusted bases in shares ofan S corporation pursuant to sections 1366 and 1367 after the S corporation made a qualified subchapter S subsidiary election (Qsub election) pursuant to section 1361, which resulted in a deemed section 332 liquidation ofa subsidiary.
After concessions the issue remaining for our consideration is whether petitioners properly increased their adjusted bases in shares ofan S corporation pursuant to sections 1366 and 1367 after the S corporation made a qualified subchapter S subsidiary election (Qsub election) pursuant to section 1361, which resulted in a deemed section 332 liquidation ofa subsidiary.
After concessions the issue remaining for our consideration is whether petitioners properly increased their adjusted bases in shares ofan S corporation pursuant to sections 1366 and 1367 after the S corporation made a qualified subchapter S subsidiary election (Qsub election) pursuant to section 1361, which resulted in a deemed section 332 liquidation ofa subsidiary.
After concessions the issue remaining for our consideration is whether petitioners properly increased their adjusted bases in shares ofan S corporation pursuant to sections 1366 and 1367 after the S corporation made a qualified subchapter S subsidiary election (Qsub election) pursuant to section 1361, which resulted in a deemed section 332 liquidation ofa subsidiary.
Unlike situations 1 and 2, situation 3 does not involve a sec. 332 liquidation entailing a carryover of tax attributes under sec.
ings Petitioner also argues that respondent’s position in this case is “wholly inconsistent with” his position contained in published revenue rulings, which, under principles derived from the attribute carryover rules of section 381(c) applicable to section 332 liquidations, “unequivocally attribute the trade or business of a subsidiary that is liquidated under section 332 to its parent.” Therefore, because H&C’s disregarded entity election involved a deemed section 332 liquidation of H&C, see s
tion that a de facto liquidation had occurred for Federal tax purposes: (1) Whether there is a manifest intention to liquidate; (2) whether - 9 - there is a continuing purpose to terminate corporate affairs and dissolve the corporation; and (3) whether the corporation’s activities are directed and confined to that purpose.
Paul Revere was liquidated into AVCO in a tax-free liquidation under section 332 on December 30, 1987.
Paul Revere was liquidated into AVCO in a tax-free liquidation under section 332 on December 30, 1987.
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1, 000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that it
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
under section 332 during 1983. In December 1983, IRA acquired 1,000 shares (100 percent) of the common stock of Carlco, TMT, and BWK, Inc. IRA's 1983 consolidated return and adjusting journal entries show that Schott's shares of IRA preferred stock were redeemed in 1983 in exchange for IRA's 1,000 shares of Cedilla Co. common stock. IRA reported that its
- 23 - With regard more specifically to the question of the relationship between the step transaction doctrine and the business purpose aspect of a transaction and in the context of analyzing a section 332 liquidation, the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
With regard more specifically to the question of the relationship between the step transaction doctrine and the business purpose aspect of a transaction and in the context of analyzing a section 332 liquidation, the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
1984-381, the regulations under section 332 (governing subsidiary liquidations) contain a definition of “complete liquidation” under section 332 that applies equally to section 331: A status of liquidation exists when the corporation ceases to be a going concern and its activities are merely for the purpose of winding up its affairs, paying its debts and distributing any remainin