§333 — Repealed. Pub. L. 99–514, title VI, § 631(e)(3), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2273]

62 cases·18 followed·7 distinguished·1 questioned·2 overruled·34 cited29% support

[§ 333. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–514, title VI, § 631(e)(3), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2273] Section, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 103; Feb. 26, 1964, Pub. L. 88–272, title II, § 225(g), 78 Stat. 89; Oct. 4, 1976, Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§ 1901(a)(44), 1906(b)(13)(A), 1951(b)(6)(A), 90 Stat. 1772, 1834, 1838, related to election as to recognition of gain in certain liquidations. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries Effective Date of RepealRepeal applicable to any distribution in complete liquidation, and any sale or exchange, made by a corporation after July 31, 1986, unless such corporation is completely liquidated before Jan. 1, 1987, any transaction described in section 338 of this title for which the acquisition date occurs after Dec. 31, 1986, and any distribution, not in complete liquidation, made after Dec. 31, 1986, with exceptions and special and transitional rules, see section 633 of Pub. L. 99–514, set out as an Effective Date note under section 336 of this title.

62 Citing Cases

Charles A. & Annette H. Buda, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-132 · 1999

Buda, pursuant to section 333, make a valid election to defer the recognition of gain on the liquidation?

o. 2018-86, 11 For tax years after December 31, 2016, Congress raised the premium ceiling to $2,200,000 and added certain diversification requirements to make a section 831(b) election. See Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, Pub. L. No. 114-113, § 333(b), 129 Stat. 2242, 3108 (2015). These changes do not have any bearing on the years at issue. 28 [*28] at *33–34. We will do so again, and we again reach the conclusion that the microcaptive arrangement before us does not constitute insurance.

Q, § 333(b)(1), 129 Stat. 2242, 3108 (2015). These changes have no bearing on the 2012 tax year at issue. 35 [*35] insurance.”). The deductibility of insurance premiums in turn de- pends on whether the payments “were truly payments for insurance.” Syzygy, 117 T.C.M. (CCH) at 1172. Accordingly, the central questions presented here—whether RMIC was ent

d by caselaw in determining whether a transaction constitutes insurance for Federal 25(...continued) that an insurance company must meet to be eligible to make a sec. 831(b) election. S_e_e Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, Pub. L. No. 114-113, sec. 333, 129 Stat. at 3106. - 29 - [*29] income tax purposes. Avrahami v. Commissioner, 149 T.C. at 174. Courts have looked to four criteria in deciding whether an arrangement constitutes insurance: (1) the arrangement involves insurable risks, (2)

d by caselaw in determining whether a transaction constitutes insurance for Federal 25(...continued) that an insurance company must meet to be eligible to make a sec. 831(b) election. S_e_e Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, Pub. L. No. 114-113, sec. 333, 129 Stat. at 3106. - 29 - [*29] income tax purposes. Avrahami v. Commissioner, 149 T.C. at 174. Courts have looked to four criteria in deciding whether an arrangement constitutes insurance: (1) the arrangement involves insurable risks, (2)

d by caselaw in determining whether a transaction constitutes insurance for Federal 25(...continued) that an insurance company must meet to be eligible to make a sec. 831(b) election. S_e_e Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, Pub. L. No. 114-113, sec. 333, 129 Stat. at 3106. - 29 - [*29] income tax purposes. Avrahami v. Commissioner, 149 T.C. at 174. Courts have looked to four criteria in deciding whether an arrangement constitutes insurance: (1) the arrangement involves insurable risks, (2)

d by caselaw in determining whether a transaction constitutes insurance for Federal 25(...continued) that an insurance company must meet to be eligible to make a sec. 831(b) election. S_e_e Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, Pub. L. No. 114-113, sec. 333, 129 Stat. at 3106. - 29 - [*29] income tax purposes. Avrahami v. Commissioner, 149 T.C. at 174. Courts have looked to four criteria in deciding whether an arrangement constitutes insurance: (1) the arrangement involves insurable risks, (2)

d by caselaw in determining whether a transaction constitutes insurance for Federal 25(...continued) that an insurance company must meet to be eligible to make a sec. 831(b) election. S_e_e Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, Pub. L. No. 114-113, sec. 333, 129 Stat. at 3106. - 29 - [*29] income tax purposes. Avrahami v. Commissioner, 149 T.C. at 174. Courts have looked to four criteria in deciding whether an arrangement constitutes insurance: (1) the arrangement involves insurable risks, (2)

g to $2.2 million--adjusted for inflation--and added new diversification requirements that an insurance company must meet in order to receive the favorable tax treatment ofsubsection (b). M Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, Pub. L. No. 114-113, sec. 333, 129 Stat. at 3106. - 54 - When the issue has come to us, we have applied and construed the Supreme Court's definition ofinsurance in Le Gierse and its four nonexclusive criteria. To be considered insurance the arrangement must: (cid:16)042

Fourth, section 7473 extends to the Tax Court authority for handling fees similar 23The Federal Rules ofEvidence are considered to be enacted like any statute. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 587 (1993). 24Before amendment in 2015, sec. 7453, first enacted in the 1926 Act, ch. 27, sec. 907, 44 Stat. at 107, requi

g to $2.2 million--adjusted for inflation--and added new diversification requirements that an insurance company must meet in order to receive the favorable tax treatment ofsubsection (b). M Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, Pub. L. No. 114-113, sec. 333, 129 Stat. at 3106. - 54 - When the issue has come to us, we have applied and construed the Supreme Court's definition ofinsurance in Le Gierse and its four nonexclusive criteria. To be considered insurance the arrangement must: (cid:16)042

Terry Duane & Joyce Engel Beall, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1998-82 · 1998

On August 1, 1988, the Corporation was liquidated, and Terry made a section 333 election.

Paul A. & Janet Mae Rendina, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-392 · 1996

and Ackerman, for the distribution of the last two condominium units to petitioner, in consideration of 12For an example of a mandatory requirement for filing a form in order to obtain specified tax treatment in a "one month" liquidation, see former sec. 333, repealed by sec. 631(e)(3) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085, 2273. - 21 - his taking care of the corporate liabilities and recovering his own investment, manifested WSAI’s intention to liquidate, and that that i

Andrea Byers v. IRS 963 F.3d 548 · Cir.
United States v. Gas Pipe 997 F.3d 231 · Cir.
Maloney v. Commissioner 93 T.C. 89 · 1989
Knowlton v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 160 · 1985
J. C. Penney Co. v. Commissioner 37 T.C. 1013 · 1962
United States v. Richard Marschall 82 F.4th 774 · Cir.
Ivey v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 76 · 1969
Rojas v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 1090 · 1988
Bolker v. Commissioner 81 T.C. 782 · 1983
Shereff v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 1140 · 1981
Ramm v. Commissioner 72 T.C. 671 · 1979
McCormac v. Commissioner 67 T.C. 955 · 1977
Cohen v. Commissioner 63 T.C. 527 · 1975
Molbreak v. Commissioner 61 T.C. 382 · 1973
Morris v. Commissioner 59 T.C. 21 · 1972
Estate of Miller v. Commissioner 43 T.C. 760 · 1965
Garrow v. Commissioner 43 T.C. 890 · 1965
Van Heusden v. Commissioner 44 T.C. 491 · 1965
Drybrough v. Commissioner 42 T.C. 1029 · 1964
United States v. Bansal 663 F.3d 634 · Cir.
Tipps v. Commissioner 74 T.C. 458 · 1980
Scifo v. Commissioner 68 T.C. 714 · 1977
Hirshfield v. Commissioner 64 T.C. 103 · 1975
Dunavant v. Commissioner 63 T.C. 316 · 1974
Cabax Mills v. Commissioner 59 T.C. 401 · 1972
Kaufman v. Commissioner 55 T.C. 1046 · 1971
Wales v. Commissioner 50 T.C. 399 · 1968
Wilkinson v. Commissioner 49 T.C. 4 · 1967
Verito v. Commissioner 43 T.C. 429 · 1965
Dunn v. Commissioner 301 F.3d 339 · Cir.
United States v. Danny L. Norwood · Cir.
United States v. Austin DeCoster 828 F.3d 626 · Cir.
United States v. Tomo Razmilovic, David E. Nachman, Kenneth Jaeggi, Movant-Appellant 419 F.3d 134 · Cir.
United States v. Danny L. Norwood 420 F.3d 888 · Cir.
United States v. T'Shaun Omar Jones 81 F.4th 591 · Cir.