§337 — Nonrecognition for property distributed to parent in complete liquidation of subsidiary
162 cases·47 followed·35 distinguished·1 criticized·79 cited—29% support
Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §337
No gain or loss shall be recognized to the liquidating corporation on the distribution to the 80-percent distributee of any property in a complete liquidation to which section 332 applies.
If—
a corporation is liquidated in a liquidation to which section 332 applies, and
on the date of the adoption of the plan of liquidation, such corporation was indebted to the 80-percent distributee,
for purposes of this section and section 336, any transfer of property to the 80-percent distributee in satisfaction of such indebtedness shall be treated as a distribution to such distributee in such liquidation.
Except as provided in subparagraph (B), paragraph (1) and subsection (a) shall not apply where the 80-percent distributee is an organization (other than a cooperative described in section 521) which is exempt from the tax imposed by this chapter.
Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to any distribution of property to an organization described in section 511(a)(2) if, immediately after such distribution, such organization uses such property in an activity the income from which is subject to tax under section 511(a).
If any property to which clause (i) applied is disposed of by the organization acquiring such property, notwithstanding any other provision of law, any gain (not in excess of the amount not recognized by reason of clause (i)) shall be included in such organization’s unrelated business taxable income. For purposes of the preceding sentence, if such property ceases to be used in an activity referred to in clause (i), such organization shall be treated as having disposed of such property on the date of such cessation.
For purposes of this section, the term “80-percent distributee” means only the corporation which meets the 80-percent stock ownership requirements specified in section 332(b). For purposes of this section, the determination of whether any corporation is an 80-percent distributee shall be made without regard to any consolidated return regulation.
The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of the amendments made by subtitle D of title VI of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, including—
regulations to ensure that such purposes may not be circumvented through the use of any provision of law or regulations (including the consolidated return regulations and part III of this subchapter) or through the use of a regulated investment company, real estate investment trust, or tax-exempt entity, and
regulations providing for appropriate coordination of the provisions of this section with the provisions of this title relating to taxation of foreign corporations and their shareholders.
Treasury Regulations
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.337-1 Nonrecognition for property distributed to parent in complete liquidation of subsidiary
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.337-1(a) General rule.
- Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.337-1(b) Applicability date.
162 Citing Cases
- 2 - The issues for decision are whether petitioner is taxable on a gain on the sale of assets or whether it adopted a plan of complete liquidation on or before the sale date of the assets in accordance with the requirements of section 337 and whether petitioner is liable for the additions to tax determined by respondent.
On its 1988 Federal income tax return, ACT took the position that the $405,776 gain it realized on the sale of its assets to JSL was nontaxable pursuant to section 337 because ACT had adopted a plan of complete liquidation on or before the sale date of the assets.
On March 31, 1983, TMC Resources was liquidated pursuant to section 337 with all of its assets and liabilities distributed to petitioners, its four equal shareholders.
City Code section 337-3 creates a Preservation Board ofeleven members--though two seats have remained empty for many years--nine ofwhich are appointed by the City's Common Council and the Mayor, and two ofwhich are representatives ofthe Buffalo and Erie County Historical Society and the Landmark Society of Niagara Frontier.
337 (West 2019) (requiring that an action upon an obligation or liability be brought within four years). Respondent contends that Mr. Bercy's security interest in Girari's assets, though unperfected, attached to the proceeds ofthe asset sale. And he contends that this security interest gave Mr. Bercy, under California law, "absolute priority o
337.15(a), (g) (West 2006); Colo. Rev. Stat. sec. 13-80-104(1)(a) (2013). The California statute defines "substantial completion" to mean the first occurrence of: "(1) The date offinal inspection by the applicable public agency. (2) The date ofrecordation ofa valid notice ofcompletion. (3) The date ofuse or occupation ofthe improvement. (4) On
337.15(a), (g) (West 2006); Colo. Rev. Stat. sec. 13-80-104(1)(a) (2013). The California statute defines "substantial completion" to mean the first occurrence of: "(1) The date offinal inspection by the applicable public agency. (2) The date ofrecordation ofa valid notice ofcompletion. (3) The date ofuse or occupation ofthe improvement. (4) On
337.15(a), (g) (West 2006); Colo. Rev. Stat. sec. 13-80-104(1)(a) (2013). The California statute defines "substantial completion" to mean the first occurrence of: "(1) The date offinal inspection by the applicable public agency. (2) The date ofrecordation ofa valid notice ofcompletion. (3) The date ofuse or occupation ofthe improvement. (4) On
1995-596, we held that ACT acted with fraudulent intent in representing falsely to the Internal.Revenue Service that it had adopted a formal plan of liquidation under section 337, attaching false minutes to its return and treating the sale of its assets as nontaxable on its Federal corporate income tax return.
On that date, Hancock Enterprises adopted a plan of liquidation under section 337 (as then in effect), filed final corporate tax returns, and distributed the 48 remaining lots to the trust.
House of Babes reported on its 1986 corporate income tax return that it was undergoing a complete liquidation under section 337 and that all of its assets were to be distributed to its shareholders within 12 months.
373 (1960), where legal expenses of collecting insurance proceeds on a building, destroyed by fire during a section 337 liquidation, were denied.
These statements were entitled "Statement Re Liquidation Under IRC Section 337" and contained the following representations: (1) A statement that the board of directors adopted a resolution recommending the complete liquidation and dissolution of each corporation in accordance with "the Plan"; (2) a statement authorizing and directing the holding of a special meeting of the shareholders to vote on the Plan; (3) a
373 (1960), where legal expenses of collecting insurance proceeds on a building, destroyed by fire during a section 337 liquidation, were denied.
— Except as otherwise provided in this section or section 337, gain or loss shall be recognized to a liquidating corporation on the distribution of property in complete liquidation as if such property were sold to the distributee at its fair market value.