§337 — Nonrecognition for property distributed to parent in complete liquidation of subsidiary

162 cases·47 followed·35 distinguished·1 criticized·79 cited29% support

(a)In general

No gain or loss shall be recognized to the liquidating corporation on the distribution to the 80-percent distributee of any property in a complete liquidation to which section 332 applies.

(b)Treatment of indebtedness of subsidiary, etc.
(1)Indebtedness of subsidiary to parent

If—

(A)

a corporation is liquidated in a liquidation to which section 332 applies, and

(B)

on the date of the adoption of the plan of liquidation, such corporation was indebted to the 80-percent distributee,

for purposes of this section and section 336, any transfer of property to the 80-percent distributee in satisfaction of such indebtedness shall be treated as a distribution to such distributee in such liquidation.

(2)Treatment of tax-exempt distributee
(A)In general

Except as provided in subparagraph (B), paragraph (1) and subsection (a) shall not apply where the 80-percent distributee is an organization (other than a cooperative described in section 521) which is exempt from the tax imposed by this chapter.

(B)Exception where property will be used in unrelated business
(i)In general

Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to any distribution of property to an organization described in section 511(a)(2) if, immediately after such distribution, such organization uses such property in an activity the income from which is subject to tax under section 511(a).

(ii)Later disposition or change in use

If any property to which clause (i) applied is disposed of by the organization acquiring such property, notwithstanding any other provision of law, any gain (not in excess of the amount not recognized by reason of clause (i)) shall be included in such organization’s unrelated business taxable income. For purposes of the preceding sentence, if such property ceases to be used in an activity referred to in clause (i), such organization shall be treated as having disposed of such property on the date of such cessation.

(c)80-percent distributee

For purposes of this section, the term “80-percent distributee” means only the corporation which meets the 80-percent stock ownership requirements specified in section 332(b). For purposes of this section, the determination of whether any corporation is an 80-percent distributee shall be made without regard to any consolidated return regulation.

(d)Regulations

The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of the amendments made by subtitle D of title VI of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, including—

(1)

regulations to ensure that such purposes may not be circumvented through the use of any provision of law or regulations (including the consolidated return regulations and part III of this subchapter) or through the use of a regulated investment company, real estate investment trust, or tax-exempt entity, and

(2)

regulations providing for appropriate coordination of the provisions of this section with the provisions of this title relating to taxation of foreign corporations and their shareholders.

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.337-1 Nonrecognition for property distributed to parent in complete liquidation of subsidiary
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.337-1(a) General rule.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.337-1(b) Applicability date.

162 Citing Cases

- 2 - The issues for decision are whether petitioner is taxable on a gain on the sale of assets or whether it adopted a plan of complete liquidation on or before the sale date of the assets in accordance with the requirements of section 337 and whether petitioner is liable for the additions to tax determined by respondent.

Jimmy D. Morris, Transferee, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2000-381 · 2000

On its 1988 Federal income tax return, ACT took the position that the $405,776 gain it realized on the sale of its assets to JSL was nontaxable pursuant to section 337 because ACT had adopted a plan of complete liquidation on or before the sale date of the assets.

Marcus R. Messman, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1998-26 · 1998

On March 31, 1983, TMC Resources was liquidated pursuant to section 337 with all of its assets and liabilities distributed to petitioners, its four equal shareholders.

City Code section 337-3 creates a Preservation Board ofeleven members--though two seats have remained empty for many years--nine ofwhich are appointed by the City's Common Council and the Mayor, and two ofwhich are representatives ofthe Buffalo and Erie County Historical Society and the Landmark Society of Niagara Frontier.

337 (West 2019) (requiring that an action upon an obligation or liability be brought within four years). Respondent contends that Mr. Bercy's security interest in Girari's assets, though unperfected, attached to the proceeds ofthe asset sale. And he contends that this security interest gave Mr. Bercy, under California law, "absolute priority o

337.15(a), (g) (West 2006); Colo. Rev. Stat. sec. 13-80-104(1)(a) (2013). The California statute defines "substantial completion" to mean the first occurrence of: "(1) The date offinal inspection by the applicable public agency. (2) The date ofrecordation ofa valid notice ofcompletion. (3) The date ofuse or occupation ofthe improvement. (4) On

337.15(a), (g) (West 2006); Colo. Rev. Stat. sec. 13-80-104(1)(a) (2013). The California statute defines "substantial completion" to mean the first occurrence of: "(1) The date offinal inspection by the applicable public agency. (2) The date ofrecordation ofa valid notice ofcompletion. (3) The date ofuse or occupation ofthe improvement. (4) On

337.15(a), (g) (West 2006); Colo. Rev. Stat. sec. 13-80-104(1)(a) (2013). The California statute defines "substantial completion" to mean the first occurrence of: "(1) The date offinal inspection by the applicable public agency. (2) The date ofrecordation ofa valid notice ofcompletion. (3) The date ofuse or occupation ofthe improvement. (4) On

Franklin W. Briggs, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2000-380 · 2000

1995-596, we held that ACT acted with fraudulent intent in representing falsely to the Internal.Revenue Service that it had adopted a formal plan of liquidation under section 337, attaching false minutes to its return and treating the sale of its assets as nontaxable on its Federal corporate income tax return.

Margaret Hancock, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-336 · 1999

On that date, Hancock Enterprises adopted a plan of liquidation under section 337 (as then in effect), filed final corporate tax returns, and distributed the 48 remaining lots to the trust.

Jeff A. Wiltzius, Transferee, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-117 · 1997

House of Babes reported on its 1986 corporate income tax return that it was undergoing a complete liquidation under section 337 and that all of its assets were to be distributed to its shareholders within 12 months.

Ivan A. & Judith L. Jasko, Petitioner 107 T.C. No. 3 · 1996

373 (1960), where legal expenses of collecting insurance proceeds on a building, destroyed by fire during a section 337 liquidation, were denied.

Earle E. Murphy, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-59 · 1996

These statements were entitled "Statement Re Liquidation Under IRC Section 337" and contained the following representations: (1) A statement that the board of directors adopted a resolution recommending the complete liquidation and dissolution of each corporation in accordance with "the Plan"; (2) a statement authorizing and directing the holding of a special meeting of the shareholders to vote on the Plan; (3) a

Jasko v. Commissioner 107 T.C. 30 · 1996

373 (1960), where legal expenses of collecting insurance proceeds on a building, destroyed by fire during a section 337 liquidation, were denied.

— Except as otherwise provided in this section or section 337, gain or loss shall be recognized to a liquidating corporation on the distribution of property in complete liquidation as if such property were sold to the distributee at its fair market value.

Rojas v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 1090 · 1988
Atlas Tool Co. v. Commissioner 70 T.C. 86 · 1978
Storz v. Commissioner 68 T.C. 84 · 1977
Estate of Munter v. Commissioner 63 T.C. 663 · 1975
Adams v. Commissioner 58 T.C. 41 · 1972
Anderson v. Commissioner 56 T.C. 1370 · 1971
Gutierrez v. Commissioner 53 T.C. 394 · 1969
Messer v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 440 · 1969
O.B.M., Inc. v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 619 · 1969
Coast Coil Co. v. Commissioner 50 T.C. 528 · 1968
John Town, Inc. v. Commissioner 46 T.C. 107 · 1966
Schick v. Commissioner 45 T.C. 368 · 1966
Wilson v. Commissioner 46 T.C. 334 · 1966
Verito v. Commissioner 43 T.C. 429 · 1965
Berghash v. Commissioner 43 T.C. 743 · 1965
Argus, Inc. v. Commissioner 45 T.C. 63 · 1965
Van Heusden v. Commissioner 44 T.C. 491 · 1965
Fibel v. Commissioner 44 T.C. 647 · 1965
J. C. Penney Co. v. Commissioner 37 T.C. 1013 · 1962
Adams v. Commissioner 38 T.C. 549 · 1962
Sproul Realty Co. v. Commissioner 38 T.C. 844 · 1962
Kuckenberg v. Commissioner 35 T.C. 473 · 1960
Alvord v. Commissioner 32 T.C. 1 · 1959
Freudmann v. Commissioner 10 T.C. 775 · 1948
Shelton v. Commissioner 105 T.C. 114 · 1995
Kean v. Commissioner 91 T.C. 575 · 1988
Rotolo v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 1500 · 1987
Estate of Jephson v. Commissioner 87 T.C. 297 · 1986
Allan v. Commissioner 86 T.C. 655 · 1986
Serianni v. Commissioner 80 T.C. 1090 · 1983
Klein v. Commissioner 75 T.C. 298 · 1980
Estate of Pfeifer v. Commissioner 69 T.C. 294 · 1977
Sanderling, Inc. v. Commissioner 66 T.C. 743 · 1976
Estate of Sidles v. Commissioner 65 T.C. 873 · 1976
Brooks v. Commissioner 63 T.C. 1 · 1974
Marshall v. Commissioner 60 T.C. 242 · 1973
Vern Realty, Inc. v. Commissioner 58 T.C. 1005 · 1972
Of Course, Inc. v. Commissioner 59 T.C. 146 · 1972
Honigman v. Commissioner 55 T.C. 1067 · 1971
Sieh v. Commissioner 56 T.C. 1386 · 1971
Callan v. Commissioner 54 T.C. 1514 · 1970
Pastene v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 647 · 1969
Rushing v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 888 · 1969
Clayton v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 911 · 1969
Keck v. Commissioner 49 T.C. 313 · 1968
Anders v. Commissioner 48 T.C. 815 · 1967
Estate of Miller v. Commissioner 43 T.C. 760 · 1965
Pridemark, Inc. v. Commissioner 42 T.C. 510 · 1964
Macabe Co. v. Commissioner 42 T.C. 1105 · 1964
Howell v. Commissioner 40 T.C. 940 · 1963
Handelman v. Commissioner 36 T.C. 560 · 1961
Katisha Ednacot v. Mesa Medical Group, PLLC · Cir.
Janpol v. Commissioner 101 T.C. 518 · 1993
Burton v. Commissioner 99 T.C. 622 · 1992
Burrill v. Commissioner 93 T.C. 643 · 1989
Esmark, Inc. v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 171 · 1988
Knowlton v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 160 · 1985
Banc One Corp. v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 476 · 1985
Furstenberg v. Commissioner 83 T.C. 755 · 1984
Bolker v. Commissioner 81 T.C. 782 · 1983
Vaughn v. Commissioner 81 T.C. 893 · 1983
Estate of Jephson v. Commissioner 81 T.C. 999 · 1983
State v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 656 · 1981
Braddock Land Co. v. Commissioner 75 T.C. 324 · 1980
Bush Bros. & Co. v. Commissioner 73 T.C. 424 · 1979
Van Raden v. Commissioner 71 T.C. 1083 · 1979
Estate of Piper v. Commissioner 72 T.C. 1062 · 1979
Rosen v. Commissioner 71 T.C. 226 · 1978
Weaver v. Commissioner 71 T.C. 443 · 1978
Schwartz v. Commissioner 69 T.C. 877 · 1978
Stern v. Commissioner 66 T.C. 91 · 1976
Allen v. Commissioner 66 T.C. 340 · 1976
Kronenberg v. Commissioner 64 T.C. 428 · 1975
Cohen v. Commissioner 63 T.C. 527 · 1975
Mele v. Commissioner 61 T.C. 358 · 1973
Kinsey v. Commissioner 58 T.C. 259 · 1972
Realty Loan Corp. v. Commissioner 54 T.C. 1083 · 1970
Estate of Glass v. Commissioner 55 T.C. 543 · 1970
Hine v. Commissioner 54 T.C. 1552 · 1970
Dodson v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 544 · 1969
Abegg v. Commissioner 50 T.C. 145 · 1968
Comtel Corp. v. Commissioner 45 T.C. 294 · 1965
Luff Co. v. Commissioner 44 T.C. 532 · 1965
J. E. Hawes Corp. v. Commissioner 44 T.C. 705 · 1965
Estate of Schmidt v. Commissioner 42 T.C. 1130 · 1964
Townsend v. Commissioner 37 T.C. 830 · 1962
Mills v. Commissioner 39 T.C. 393 · 1962
Philbrick v. Commissioner 38 T.C. 666 · 1962
Marsman v. Commissioner 18 T.C. 1 · 1952
Clark v. Commissioner 19 T.C. 48 · 1952
Tammy Berera v. Mesa Medical Group, PLLC 779 F.3d 352 · Cir.
Charles Francisco Cecilia Francisco v. United States 267 F.3d 303 · Cir.
Cunningham v. Cornell University 86 F.4th 961 · Cir.