§3572

15 cases·15 cited

Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §3572

Statute text not available for this section.

15 Citing Cases

Randy Alan Carpenter, Petitioner · 2019

3572(d)(1) (2012). To determine whether a sentencing court specified that a restitution obligation is due immediately Federal courts look to thejudge's oral pronouncements at the time ofsentencing and the subsequent writtenjudgment. Where the writtenjudgment conflicts with the court's oral pronouncements, the oral pronouncements control. See R

United States v. Myers 136 F.4th 917 · Cir.

United States v. David Swartz · Cir.

United States v. Boal 534 F.3d 965 · Cir.

United States v. Hyde 497 F.3d 103 · Cir.

United States v. Witham 648 F.3d 40 · Cir.

United States v. Park 758 F.3d 193 · Cir.

United States v. Bonnie Boal · Cir.

United States v. Martinez 812 F.3d 1200 · Cir.

United States v. Zukerman · Cir.

United States v. William Rand · Cir.

United States v. Yielding 657 F.3d 722 · Cir.

United States v. Intini 18 F. App'x 411 · Cir.

United States v. Zukerman 897 F.3d 423 · Cir.

Andrew Stacy v. United States 70 F.4th 369 · Cir.

§3572

15 Citing Cases

New cases, delivered.