§362 — Basis to corporations
149 citing cases
Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §362
If property was acquired by a corporation—
in connection with a transaction to which section 351 (relating to transfer of property to corporation controlled by transferor) applies, or
as paid-in surplus or as a contribution to capital,
then the basis shall be the same as it would be in the hands of the transferor, increased in the amount of gain recognized to the transferor on such transfer.
If property was acquired by a corporation in connection with a reorganization to which this part applies, then the basis shall be the same as it would be in the hands of the transferor, increased in the amount of gain recognized to the transferor on such transfer. This subsection shall not apply if the property acquired consists of stock or securities in a corporation a party to the reorganization, unless acquired by the exchange of stock or securities of the transferee (or of a corporation which is in control of the transferee) as the consideration in whole or in part for the transfer.
Notwithstanding subsection (a)(2), if property other than money—
is acquired by a corporation as a contribution to capital, and
is not contributed by a shareholder as such,
then the basis of such property shall be zero.
Notwithstanding subsection (a)(2), if money—
is received by a corporation as a contribution to capital, and
is not contributed by a shareholder as such,
then the basis of any property acquired with such money during the 12-month period beginning on the day the contribution is received shall be reduced by the amount of such contribution. The excess (if any) of the amount of such contribution over the amount of the reduction under the preceding sentence shall be applied to the reduction (as of the last day of the period specified in the preceding sentence) of the basis of any other property held by the taxpayer. The particular properties to which the reductions required by this paragraph shall be allocated shall be determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary.
In no event shall the basis of any property be increased under subsection (a) or (b) above the fair market value of such property (determined without regard to section 7701(g)) by reason of any gain recognized to the transferor as a result of the assumption of a liability.
Except as provided in regulations, if—
gain is recognized to the transferor as a result of an assumption of a nonrecourse liability by a transferee which is also secured by assets not transferred to such transferee; and
no person is subject to tax under this title on such gain,
then, for purposes of determining basis under subsections (a) and (b), the amount of gain recognized by the transferor as a result of the assumption of the liability shall be determined as if the liability assumed by the transferee equaled such transferee’s ratable portion of such liability determined on the basis of the relative fair market values (determined without regard to section 7701(g)) of all of the assets subject to such liability.
If in any transaction described in subsection (a) or (b) there would (but for this subsection) be an importation of a net built-in loss, the basis of each property described in subparagraph (B) which is acquired in such transaction shall (notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b)) be its fair market value immediately after such transaction.
For purposes of subparagraph (A), property is described in this subparagraph if—
gain or loss with respect to such property is not subject to tax under this subtitle in the hands of the transferor immediately before the transfer, and
gain or loss with respect to such property is subject to such tax in the hands of the transferee immediately after such transfer.
In any case in which the transferor is a partnership, the preceding sentence shall be applied by treating each partner in such partnership as holding such partner’s proportionate share of the property of such partnership.
For purposes of subparagraph (A), there is an importation of a net built-in loss in a transaction if the transferee’s aggregate adjusted bases of property described in subparagraph (B) which is transferred in such transaction would (but for this paragraph) exceed the fair market value of such property immediately after such transaction.
If—
property is transferred by a transferor in any transaction which is described in subsection (a) and which is not described in paragraph (1) of this subsection, and
the transferee’s aggregate adjusted bases of such property so transferred would (but for this paragraph) exceed the fair market value of such property immediately after such transaction,
then, notwithstanding subsection (a), the transferee’s aggregate adjusted bases of the property so transferred shall not exceed the fair market value of such property immediately after such transaction.
The aggregate reduction in basis by reason of subparagraph (A) shall be allocated among the property so transferred in proportion to their respective built-in losses immediately before the transaction.
If the transferor and transferee of a transaction described in subparagraph (A) both elect the application of this subparagraph—
subparagraph (A) shall not apply, and
the transferor’s basis in the stock received for property to which subparagraph (A) does not apply by reason of the election shall not exceed its fair market value immediately after the transfer.
Any election under clause (i) shall be made at such time and in such form and manner as the Secretary may prescribe, and, once made, shall be irrevocable.
Treasury Regulations
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-1Basis to corporations
(a) In general. Section 362 provides, as a general rule, that if property was acquired on or after June 22, 1954, by a corporation (1) in connection with a transaction to which section 351 (relating to transfer of property to corporation controlled by transferor) applies, (2) as paid-in surplus or as a contribution to capital, or (3) in connection with a reorganization to which part III, subchapter C, chapter 1 of the Code applies, then the basis shall be the same as it would be in the hands of the transferor, increased in the amount of gain recognized to the transferor on such transfer. (See also § 1.362-2.) See § 1.460-4(k)(3)(iv)(B)(2) for rules relating to adjustments to the basis of certain contracts accounted for using a long-term contract method of accounting that are acquired in certain transfers described in section 351 and certain reorganizations described in section 368(a).
(b) Exceptions. (1) In the case of a plan of reorganization adopted after October 22, 1968, section 362 does not apply if the property acquired in connection with such reorganization consists of stock or securities in a corporation a party to the reorganization, unless acquired by the exchange of stock or securities of the transferee (or of a corporation which is in control of the transferee) as the consideration in whole or in part for the transfer.
(2) In the case of a plan of reorganization adopted before October 23, 1968, section 362 does not apply if the property acquired in connection with such reorganization consists of stock or securities in a corporation a party to the reorganization, unless acquired by the issuance of stock or securities of the transferee (or, in the case of transactions occurring after December 31, 1963, of a corporation which is in control of the transferee) as the consideration in whole or in part for the transfer. The term issuance of stock or securities includes any transfer of stock or securities, including stock or securities which were purchased or were acquired as a contribution to capital.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-1(a)In general.
In general. Section 362 provides, as a general rule, that if property was acquired on or after June 22, 1954, by a corporation (1) in connection with a transaction to which section 351 (relating to transfer of property to corporation controlled by transferor) applies, (2) as paid-in surplus or as a contribution to capital, or (3) in connection with a reorganization to which part III, subchapter C, chapter 1 of the Code applies, then the basis shall be the same as it would be in the hands of the transferor, increased in the amount of gain recognized to the transferor on such transfer. (See also § 1.362-2.) See § 1.460-4(k)(3)(iv)(B)(2) for rules relating to adjustments to the basis of certain contracts accounted for using a long-term contract method of accounting that are acquired in certain transfers described in section 351 and certain reorganizations described in section 368(a).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-1(b)Exceptions.
Exceptions. (1) In the case of a plan of reorganization adopted after October 22, 1968, section 362 does not apply if the property acquired in connection with such reorganization consists of stock or securities in a corporation a party to the reorganization, unless acquired by the exchange of stock or securities of the transferee (or of a corporation which is in control of the transferee) as the consideration in whole or in part for the transfer.
(2) In the case of a plan of reorganization adopted before October 23, 1968, section 362 does not apply if the property acquired in connection with such reorganization consists of stock or securities in a corporation a party to the reorganization, unless acquired by the issuance of stock or securities of the transferee (or, in the case of transactions occurring after December 31, 1963, of a corporation which is in control of the transferee) as the consideration in whole or in part for the transfer. The term issuance of stock or securities includes any transfer of stock or securities, including stock or securities which were purchased or were acquired as a contribution to capital.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-2Certain contributions to capital
The following regulations shall be used in the application of section 362(c):
(a) Property deemed to be acquired with contributed money shall be that property, if any, the acquisition of which was the purpose motivating the contribution;
(b) In the case of an excess of the amount of money contributed over the cost of the property deemed to be acquired with such money (as defined in paragraph (a) of this section) such excess shall be applied to the reduction of the basis (but not below zero) of other properties held by the corporation, on the last day of the 12-month period beginning on the day the contribution is received, in the following order—
(1) All property of a character subject to an allowance for depreciation (not including any properties as to which a deduction for amortization is allowable),
(2) Property with respect to which a deduction for amortization is allowable,
(3) Property with respect to which a deduction for depletion is allowable under section 611 but not under section 613, and
(4) All other remaining properties.
The reduction of the basis of each of the properties within each of the above categories shall be made in proportion to the relative bases of such properties.
(c) With the consent of the Commissioner, the taxpayer may, however, have the basis of the various units of property within a particular category adjusted in a manner different from the general rule set forth in paragraph (b) of this section. Variations from such rule may, for example, involve adjusting the basis of only certain units of the taxpayer's property within a given category. A request for variations from the general rule should be filed by the taxpayer with its return for the taxable year for which the transfer of the property has occurred.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-2(a)§1.362-2(a)
Property deemed to be acquired with contributed money shall be that property, if any, the acquisition of which was the purpose motivating the contribution;
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-2(b)§1.362-2(b)
In the case of an excess of the amount of money contributed over the cost of the property deemed to be acquired with such money (as defined in paragraph (a) of this section) such excess shall be applied to the reduction of the basis (but not below zero) of other properties held by the corporation, on the last day of the 12-month period beginning on the day the contribution is received, in the following order—
(1) All property of a character subject to an allowance for depreciation (not including any properties as to which a deduction for amortization is allowable),
(2) Property with respect to which a deduction for amortization is allowable,
(3) Property with respect to which a deduction for depletion is allowable under section 611 but not under section 613, and
(4) All other remaining properties.
The reduction of the basis of each of the properties within each of the above categories shall be made in proportion to the relative bases of such properties.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-2(c)With the consent of the Commissioner, the taxpayer may, however, have the basis of the various units of property within a particular category adjusted in a manner different from the general rule set forth in paragraph (b) of this section.
With the consent of the Commissioner, the taxpayer may, however, have the basis of the various units of property within a particular category adjusted in a manner different from the general rule set forth in paragraph (b) of this section. Variations from such rule may, for example, involve adjusting the basis of only certain units of the taxpayer's property within a given category. A request for variations from the general rule should be filed by the taxpayer with its return for the taxable year for which the transfer of the property has occurred.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-3Basis of importation property acquired in loss importation transaction
(a) Purpose. The purpose of section 362(e)(1) and this section is to modify the application of section 362(a) (section 351 transfers, contributions to capital, or paid-in surplus) and section 362(b) (reorganizations) to prevent a corporation (Acquiring) from importing a net built-in loss in a transaction described in either section. See paragraph (c) of this section for definitions of terms used in this section.
(b) Basis determinations under this section—(1) Basis of importation property received in loss importation transaction. Notwithstanding the general rules of section 362(a) and (b), Acquiring's basis in importation property (as defined in paragraph (c)(2) of this section) acquired in a loss importation transaction (as defined in paragraph (c)(3) of this section) is equal to the value of the property immediately after the transaction.
(2) Adjustment to basis of subsidiary stock in triangular reorganizations. If a corporation (P) computes its basis in stock of a subsidiary (whether S or T) under § 1.358-6 (stock basis in certain triangular reorganizations), P's basis in property treated as acquired by P in § 1.358-6(c) is determined under section 362(e)(1) and this section to the extent such property, if actually acquired by P, would be importation property acquired in a loss importation transaction. See § 1.358-6(c)(1)(i)(A), (c)(2)(ii)(B), and (c)(3)(i). The subsidiary's basis in the property actually acquired in the transaction is determined under applicable law (including this section), without regard to the amount of any adjustment to P's basis in the subsidiary's stock. Thus, the basis of the property in S's or T's hands may differ from the amount of the adjustment to P's basis in its stock of S or T.
(3) Acquiring's basis in other property transferred. In general, Acquiring's basis in property received in a section 362 transaction (as defined in paragraph (c)(1) of this section) that is not determined under section 362(e)(1) and this section is determined under section 362(a) or section 362(b). However, if the transaction is described in section 362(a) (without regard to whether it is also described in any other section), further adjustment may be required under section 362(e)(2). See § 1.362-4.
(4) Other effects of basis determination under this section—(i) Determination by reference to transferor's basis. A determination of basis under this section is a determination by reference to the transferor's basis, including for purposes of sections 1223(2) and 7701(a)(43). However, solely for purposes of applying section 755, a determination of basis under this section is treated as a determination not by reference to the transferor's basis.
(ii) Not tax-exempt income or noncapital, nondeductible expense. The application of this section does not give rise to an item treated as tax-exempt income under § 1.1502-32(b)(2)(ii) or as a noncapital, nondeductible expense under § 1.1502-32(b)(2)(iii).
(iii) No effect on earnings and profits. Any determination of basis under this section does not reduce or otherwise affect the calculation of the all earnings and profits amount provided in § 1.367(b)-2(d).
(c) Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1) Section 362 transaction. The term section 362 transaction means any transaction described in section 362(a) or in section 362(b).
(2) Importation property—(i) General rule. The term importation property means any property (including separate portions determined under paragraph (d)(4) of this section and separate portions of property tentatively divided under paragraph (e)(2) of this section) with respect to which—
(A) Any gain or loss that would be recognized on its sale by the transferor immediately before the transaction (the transferor's hypothetical sale) would not be subject to tax imposed under any provision of subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code (federal income tax) (taking into account the provisions of paragraph (d) of this section); and
(B) Any gain or loss that would be recognized on its sale by Acquiring immediately after the transaction (Acquiring's hypothetical sale) would be subject to federal income tax (taking into account the provisions of paragraph (d) of this section).
(ii) Special rules for applying this paragraph (c)(2). See paragraph (d) of this section for rules for determining whether gain or loss on a hypothetical sale would be taken into account in determining a federal income tax liability and paragraph (e) of this section for rules applicable when more than one person would take such gain or loss into account.
(3) Loss importation transaction. The term loss importation transaction means any section 362 transaction in which Acquiring's aggregate basis in all importation property received from all transferors in the transaction would exceed the aggregate value of such property immediately after the transaction. For this purpose, Acquiring's basis in property received is determined without regard to this section or section 362(e)(2).
(4) Value—(i) General rule. The term value means fair market value.
(ii) Special rule for transfers of partnership interests. Notwithstanding the general rule in paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section, when referring to a partnership interest, for purposes of this section, the term value means the sum of the cash that Acquiring would receive for the interest, assuming an exchange between a willing buyer and a willing seller (neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts), increased by any § 1.752-1 liabilities (as defined in § 1.752-1(a)(4)) of the partnership allocated to Acquiring with regard to such transferred interest under section 752 immediately after the transfer to Acquiring. If a partnership has elected under section 754, or if section 743(b) would require a downward basis adjustment to the partnership property, the partnership must apply the rules of § 1.743-1 to determine the amount of the basis adjustment to the partnership property.
(d) Rules for determining whether gain or loss would be taken into account in determining a federal income tax liability—(1) General rule. In general, any gain or loss that would be recognized on a hypothetical sale described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section is considered to be subject to federal income tax if, taking into account all relevant facts and circumstances, such gain or loss would affect or be taken into account in determining the federal income tax liability of the transferor or Acquiring, respectively. This determination is made without regard to whether such person has or would have any actual federal income tax liability for the taxable year of the transaction.
(2) Look-through rule in the case of certain pass-through entities. Notwithstanding the general rule in paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the determination of whether any gain or loss on a hypothetical sale would be treated as subject to federal income tax is made by reference to the person that would be required to include such gain or loss in its taxable income if the hypothetical seller is—
(i) A trust treated as owned by its grantors or others (see section 671);
(ii) A partnership (see section 701); or
(iii) An S corporation (see sections 1363 and 1366).
(3) Controlled foreign corporation (CFC), passive foreign investment company (PFIC). For purposes of this section, gain or loss that would be recognized by a CFC (as defined in section 957(a)) or a PFIC (as defined in section 1297(a)) is not deemed taken into account in determining a federal income tax liability solely because it could affect an inclusion under section 951(a) or section 1293(a).
(4) Special rule for debt-financed property subject to section 512. If property is debt-financed property (as defined in section 514(b)) owned by an organization subject to the unrelated business income tax described in section 511(a)(2) and, as a result, a portion of any gain or loss on a sale of the property would be included in unrelated taxable business income (UBTI) under section 512, such property is treated as divided into separate portions in proportion to the amount of such gain or loss that would be includible in UBTI. The rules of paragraph (e) of this section apply to determine the characterization of such portions (as includible in the determination of a federal income tax liability or not), and the tax treatment and consequences of the transaction in which such portions are transferred.
(5) Look-through treatment in the case of certain avoidance transactions—(i) Application of this paragraph (d)(5). This paragraph (d)(5) applies if—
(A) The transferor is a domestic entity that is a trust (other than a trust described in paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section), estate, regulated investment company (as defined in section 851(a)), a real estate investment trust (as defined in section 856(a)), or a cooperative (as described in section 1381); and
(B) The transferor transfers, directly or indirectly, property that was transferred to or acquired by it as part of a plan (whether of transferor, Acquiring, or any other person) to avoid the application of section 362(e)(1) and this section to a section 362 transaction.
(ii) Effect of application of this paragraph (d)(5). Notwithstanding paragraph (d)(1) of this section, if a transferor is described in both paragraphs (d)(5)(i)(A) and (B) of this section—
(A) The transferor is treated as though it distributes the proceeds of the hypothetical sale (which, for this purpose, are presumed to be an amount greater than zero);
(B) To the fullest extent possible under the transferor's organizing instrument, the deemed distribution is treated as made to a distributee or distributees that would not take distributions from the transferor into account in determining a federal income tax liability; and
(C) The determination of whether the gain or loss on the hypothetical sale is treated as subject to federal income tax is made by reference to the deemed distributee or distributees.
(iii) Tiered entities. If a deemed distributee is an entity described in paragraph (d)(5)(i)(A) of this section, the determination of whether gain or loss on the hypothetical sale is taken into account in determining a federal income tax liability is made by treating the deemed distributee, and any successive such deemed distributees, as a transferor and applying the rules in paragraphs (d)(5)(i) and (ii) of this section to its deemed distribution (and to all successive deemed distributions), until no deemed distributee or successive deemed distributee is an entity described in paragraph (d)(5)(i)(A) of this section.
(e) Special rules for gain or loss that would be taken into account by multiple persons—(1) In general. If gain or loss from a disposition of property would be includible in income by more than one person, the property is treated as tentatively divided into separate portions in proportion to the amount of gain or loss recognized with respect to the property that would be allocated to each such person. If an entity's organizing instrument specially allocates gain and loss, the tentative division of property under this paragraph (e) must reflect the manner in which gain or loss on the disposition of such property would be allocated under the terms of the organizing instrument and any applicable rules of law, taking into account the net gain or loss actually recognized by the entity in that tax year.
(2) Application of section. The rules of this section apply independently to each tentatively divided portion to determine if the portion is importation property. Each tentatively divided portion that is determined to be importation property is included with all other importation property in the determination of whether the transaction is a loss importation transaction.
(3) Acquiring's basis in property tentatively divided into separate portions. Immediately after the application of section 362(e)(1) and this section and before the application of section 362(e)(2), each property treated as tentatively divided into separate portions for purposes of applying section 362(e)(1) and this section ceases to be treated as tentatively divided and Acquiring has a single, undivided basis in such property that is equal to the sum of—
(i) The value of each tentatively divided portion that is importation property, if the transaction is a loss importation transaction; and
(ii) Acquiring's basis in each tentatively divided portion that is not importation property received in a loss importation transaction, as determined under section 362(a) or section 362(b), as applicable, and without regard to any potential application of section 362(e)(2).
(f) Examples. The examples in this paragraph (f) illustrate the application of section 362(e)(1) and the provisions of this section. Unless otherwise indicated, the examples use the following nomenclature and assumptions: A and B are U.S. citizens. DC, DC1, and P are domestic corporations that have not elected to be S corporations within the meaning of section 1361(a)(1) and that are not members of a consolidated group. F is a foreign individual. FP is a foreign partnership. FC, FC1, and FC2 are foreign corporations. Unless the facts indicate otherwise, the foreign individuals, corporations, and partnerships are not engaged in a U.S. trade or business, have no U.S. real property interests, and have no other relationships, activities, or interests that would cause them, their shareholders, their partners, or their property to be subject to federal income tax. There is no applicable income tax treaty, all persons' tax years are calendar years, and all persons and transactions are unrelated unless the facts indicate otherwise.
(D) FC1's basis in P stock. Under section 358, FC1's basis in the P stock it receives in the exchange is $100.
(g) Applicability date. This section applies with respect to any transaction occurring on or after March 28, 2016, and also with respect to any transaction occurring before such date as a result of an entity classification election under § 301.7701-3 of this chapter filed on or after March 28, 2016, unless such transaction is pursuant to a binding agreement that was in effect prior to March 28, 2016 and at all times thereafter. In addition, taxpayers may apply this section to any transaction occurring after October 22, 2004.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-3(a)Purpose.
Purpose. The purpose of section 362(e)(1) and this section is to modify the application of section 362(a) (section 351 transfers, contributions to capital, or paid-in surplus) and section 362(b) (reorganizations) to prevent a corporation (Acquiring) from importing a net built-in loss in a transaction described in either section. See paragraph (c) of this section for definitions of terms used in this section.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-3(b)Basis determinations under this section—(1) Basis of importation property received in loss importation transaction.
Basis determinations under this section—(1) Basis of importation property received in loss importation transaction. Notwithstanding the general rules of section 362(a) and (b), Acquiring's basis in importation property (as defined in paragraph (c)(2) of this section) acquired in a loss importation transaction (as defined in paragraph (c)(3) of this section) is equal to the value of the property immediately after the transaction.
(2) Adjustment to basis of subsidiary stock in triangular reorganizations. If a corporation (P) computes its basis in stock of a subsidiary (whether S or T) under § 1.358-6 (stock basis in certain triangular reorganizations), P's basis in property treated as acquired by P in § 1.358-6(c) is determined under section 362(e)(1) and this section to the extent such property, if actually acquired by P, would be importation property acquired in a loss importation transaction. See § 1.358-6(c)(1)(i)(A), (c)(2)(ii)(B), and (c)(3)(i). The subsidiary's basis in the property actually acquired in the transaction is determined under applicable law (including this section), without regard to the amount of any adjustment to P's basis in the subsidiary's stock. Thus, the basis of the property in S's or T's hands may differ from the amount of the adjustment to P's basis in its stock of S or T.
(3) Acquiring's basis in other property transferred. In general, Acquiring's basis in property received in a section 362 transaction (as defined in paragraph (c)(1) of this section) that is not determined under section 362(e)(1) and this section is determined under section 362(a) or section 362(b). However, if the transaction is described in section 362(a) (without regard to whether it is also described in any other section), further adjustment may be required under section 362(e)(2). See § 1.362-4.
(4) Other effects of basis determination under this section—(i) Determination by reference to transferor's basis. A determination of basis under this section is a determination by reference to the transferor's basis, including for purposes of sections 1223(2) and 7701(a)(43). However, solely for purposes of applying section 755, a determination of basis under this section is treated as a determination not by reference to the transferor's basis.
(ii) Not tax-exempt income or noncapital, nondeductible expense. The application of this section does not give rise to an item treated as tax-exempt income under § 1.1502-32(b)(2)(ii) or as a noncapital, nondeductible expense under § 1.1502-32(b)(2)(iii).
(iii) No effect on earnings and profits. Any determination of basis under this section does not reduce or otherwise affect the calculation of the all earnings and profits amount provided in § 1.367(b)-2(d).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-3(c)Definitions.
Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1) Section 362 transaction. The term section 362 transaction means any transaction described in section 362(a) or in section 362(b).
(2) Importation property—(i) General rule. The term importation property means any property (including separate portions determined under paragraph (d)(4) of this section and separate portions of property tentatively divided under paragraph (e)(2) of this section) with respect to which—
(A) Any gain or loss that would be recognized on its sale by the transferor immediately before the transaction (the transferor's hypothetical sale) would not be subject to tax imposed under any provision of subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code (federal income tax) (taking into account the provisions of paragraph (d) of this section); and
(B) Any gain or loss that would be recognized on its sale by Acquiring immediately after the transaction (Acquiring's hypothetical sale) would be subject to federal income tax (taking into account the provisions of paragraph (d) of this section).
(ii) Special rules for applying this paragraph (c)(2). See paragraph (d) of this section for rules for determining whether gain or loss on a hypothetical sale would be taken into account in determining a federal income tax liability and paragraph (e) of this section for rules applicable when more than one person would take such gain or loss into account.
(3) Loss importation transaction. The term loss importation transaction means any section 362 transaction in which Acquiring's aggregate basis in all importation property received from all transferors in the transaction would exceed the aggregate value of such property immediately after the transaction. For this purpose, Acquiring's basis in property received is determined without regard to this section or section 362(e)(2).
(4) Value—(i) General rule. The term value means fair market value.
(ii) Special rule for transfers of partnership interests. Notwithstanding the general rule in paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section, when referring to a partnership interest, for purposes of this section, the term value means the sum of the cash that Acquiring would receive for the interest, assuming an exchange between a willing buyer and a willing seller (neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts), increased by any § 1.752-1 liabilities (as defined in § 1.752-1(a)(4)) of the partnership allocated to Acquiring with regard to such transferred interest under section 752 immediately after the transfer to Acquiring. If a partnership has elected under section 754, or if section 743(b) would require a downward basis adjustment to the partnership property, the partnership must apply the rules of § 1.743-1 to determine the amount of the basis adjustment to the partnership property.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-3(d)Rules for determining whether gain or loss would be taken into account in determining a federal income tax liability—(1) General rule.
Rules for determining whether gain or loss would be taken into account in determining a federal income tax liability—(1) General rule. In general, any gain or loss that would be recognized on a hypothetical sale described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section is considered to be subject to federal income tax if, taking into account all relevant facts and circumstances, such gain or loss would affect or be taken into account in determining the federal income tax liability of the transferor or Acquiring, respectively. This determination is made without regard to whether such person has or would have any actual federal income tax liability for the taxable year of the transaction.
(2) Look-through rule in the case of certain pass-through entities. Notwithstanding the general rule in paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the determination of whether any gain or loss on a hypothetical sale would be treated as subject to federal income tax is made by reference to the person that would be required to include such gain or loss in its taxable income if the hypothetical seller is—
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-3(e)Special rules for gain or loss that would be taken into account by multiple persons—(1) In general.
Special rules for gain or loss that would be taken into account by multiple persons—(1) In general. If gain or loss from a disposition of property would be includible in income by more than one person, the property is treated as tentatively divided into separate portions in proportion to the amount of gain or loss recognized with respect to the property that would be allocated to each such person. If an entity's organizing instrument specially allocates gain and loss, the tentative division of property under this paragraph (e) must reflect the manner in which gain or loss on the disposition of such property would be allocated under the terms of the organizing instrument and any applicable rules of law, taking into account the net gain or loss actually recognized by the entity in that tax year.
(2) Application of section. The rules of this section apply independently to each tentatively divided portion to determine if the portion is importation property. Each tentatively divided portion that is determined to be importation property is included with all other importation property in the determination of whether the transaction is a loss importation transaction.
(3) Acquiring's basis in property tentatively divided into separate portions. Immediately after the application of section 362(e)(1) and this section and before the application of section 362(e)(2), each property treated as tentatively divided into separate portions for purposes of applying section 362(e)(1) and this section ceases to be treated as tentatively divided and Acquiring has a single, undivided basis in such property that is equal to the sum of—
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-3(f)Examples.
Examples. The examples in this paragraph (f) illustrate the application of section 362(e)(1) and the provisions of this section. Unless otherwise indicated, the examples use the following nomenclature and assumptions: A and B are U.S. citizens. DC, DC1, and P are domestic corporations that have not elected to be S corporations within the meaning of section 1361(a)(1) and that are not members of a consolidated group. F is a foreign individual. FP is a foreign partnership. FC, FC1, and FC2 are foreign corporations. Unless the facts indicate otherwise, the foreign individuals, corporations, and partnerships are not engaged in a U.S. trade or business, have no U.S. real property interests, and have no other relationships, activities, or interests that would cause them, their shareholders, their partners, or their property to be subject to federal income tax. There is no applicable income tax treaty, all persons' tax years are calendar years, and all persons and transactions are unrelated unless the facts indicate otherwise.
(D) FC1's basis in P stock. Under section 358, FC1's basis in the P stock it receives in the exchange is $100.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-3(g)Applicability date.
Applicability date. This section applies with respect to any transaction occurring on or after March 28, 2016, and also with respect to any transaction occurring before such date as a result of an entity classification election under § 301.7701-3 of this chapter filed on or after March 28, 2016, unless such transaction is pursuant to a binding agreement that was in effect prior to March 28, 2016 and at all times thereafter. In addition, taxpayers may apply this section to any transaction occurring after October 22, 2004.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-3(i)§1.362-3(i)
The value of each tentatively divided portion that is importation property, if the transaction is a loss importation transaction; and
(ii) Acquiring's basis in each tentatively divided portion that is not importation property received in a loss importation transaction, as determined under section 362(a) or section 362(b), as applicable, and without regard to any potential application of section 362(e)(2).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-4Basis of loss duplication property
(a) Purpose and scope—(1) In general. The purpose of section 362(e)(2) and this section is to prevent the duplication of net loss in transfers to which section 351 applies, capital contributions, and paid-in surplus (each, a section 362(a) transaction). See paragraph (g) of this section for definitions of terms used in this section.
(2) Intercompany transactions. For rules relating to the application of section 362(e)(2) to transfers between members of a consolidated group on or after October 22, 2004, see § 1.1502-80(h).
(b) Basis determinations under section 362(e)(2) and this section. Notwithstanding section 362(a), if a corporation (Acquiring) receives loss duplication property (as defined in paragraph (g)(1) of this section) from a person (Transferor) in a loss duplication transaction (as defined in paragraph (g)(2) of this section), Acquiring's basis in such property is equal to the basis of the property determined without regard to section 362(e)(2) and this section (as described in paragraph (g)(1)(ii) of this section), reduced by the property's allocable portion of Transferor's net built-in loss (as defined in paragraph (g)(3) of this section). If more than one Transferor transfers property to a corporation in a section 362(a) transaction, whether and the extent to which section 362(e)(2) and this section apply is determined separately for each Transferor.
(c) Exceptions and special rules—(1) Transactions in which net built-in loss is eliminated without recognition. Section 362(e)(2) does not apply to a transaction to the extent that—
(i) Without recognizing gain or loss, Transferor distributes the Acquiring stock received in the transaction; and
(ii) Upon completion of the transaction, no person holds Acquiring stock or any other asset with a basis determined, in whole or in part, by reference to Transferor's basis in the distributed Acquiring stock.
(2) Certain transactions outside of the United States. Section 362(e)(2) does not apply to a transaction if—
(i) Neither Transferor nor Acquiring is a U.S. person (as defined in section 7701(a)(30)), a person otherwise required to file a U.S. return for the year of the transaction, a controlled foreign corporation (CFC, as defined in paragraph (g)(7) of this section), or a controlled foreign partnership (CFP, as defined in paragraph (g)(9) of this section) on the date of the transaction;
(ii) The transfer occurs more than two years prior to the date of any event described in paragraph (d)(3)(ii)(E), (F), or (G) of this section; and
(iii) The original transaction and the event or events described in paragraph (d)(3)(ii)(E), (F), or (G) of this section were not entered into with a view to reducing or avoiding the Federal income tax liability of any person by avoiding the application of section 362(e)(2) and this section to the original transaction.
(3) Other effects of basis determination under this section—(i) Determination by reference to transferor's basis. A determination of basis under this section is a determination by reference to the transferor's basis, including for purposes of sections 755, 1223(2), and 7701(a)(43).
(ii) Treatment as tax-exempt income or noncapital, nondeductible expense. A determination of basis under paragraph (b) of this section does not give rise to an item treated as a noncapital, nondeductible expense under § 1.1502-32(b)(2)(iii). However, a determination of basis under paragraph (d) of this section does give rise to an item treated as a noncapital, nondeductible expense under § 1.1502-32(b)(2)(iii).
(d) Election to reduce Transferor's stock basis instead of Acquiring's asset basis—(1) In general. In lieu of making the basis reductions otherwise required under paragraph (b) of this section, Transferor and Acquiring may elect to reduce Transferor's basis in Acquiring stock that is received in the transaction without the recognition of gain or loss (the section 362(e)(2)(C) election). The section 362(e)(2)(C) election may be made protectively and will have no effect to the extent that property transferred in the transaction is determined not to be subject to section 362(e)(2) and this section. However, the election is irrevocable once it is made. A section 362(e)(2)(C) election is made and effective if—
(i) Prior to the filing of a Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement (described in paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section), Transferor and Acquiring enter into a written, binding agreement to elect to apply section 362(e)(2)(C); and
(ii) The Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement is filed in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
(2) Effect of section 362(e)(2)(C) election. If a section 362(e)(2)(C) election is made and in effect—
(i) An amount equal to the portion of Transferor's net built-in loss (as defined in paragraph (g)(3) of this section) that would otherwise be applied to reduce asset basis under paragraph (b) of this section is allocated among the Acquiring shares received or deemed received in the exchange (in proportion to the value of such shares) and applied to reduce Transferor's basis (determined without regard to section 362(e)(2) and this section) in each such share; and
(ii) Acquiring's basis in loss duplication property received from Transferor in the transaction is not determined under section 362(e)(2) and this section.
(3) Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement—(i) Form and contents of statement. The Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement is to be titled “Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement.” The Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement must—
(A) Identify (by name and tax identification number, if any) Transferor and Acquiring;
(B) State that Transferor and Acquiring have entered into a written, binding agreement to elect to apply section 362(e)(2)(C) as required in paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section; and
(C) State the date of the transaction (or, if the transaction includes transfers on more than one date, then the dates of all transfers) to which the election applies.
(ii) Filing the Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement. In general, the Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement is filed by the person or entity described in the applicable paragraph of this paragraph (d)(3)(ii). Thus, if Transferor is a partnership, S corporation, trust (including a subpart E trust), or other pass-through entity, or Acquiring is an S corporation, the entity (and not the partners, shareholders, or other persons having an interest in the entity or its property) is the person that must file the Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement, without regard to whether such entity is foreign or domestic. However, in the case of a CFC or CFP, the controlling U.S. shareholders of the CFC or the reporting U.S. partners of the CFP, respectively, file the Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement.
(A) Transferor is a person required to file a U.S. return. If Transferor is a person required to file a U.S. return for the year of the transfer, Transferor must include the Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement on or with its timely filed (including extensions) original U.S. return for the taxable year in which the transfer occurred.
(B) Transferor is a CFC or CFP and not required to file a U.S. return. If paragraph (d)(3)(ii)(A) of this section does not apply and Transferor is either a CFC or a CFP on the date of the transfer, all of Transferor's controlling U.S. shareholders (in the case of a CFC) or all of Transferor's reporting U.S. partners (in the case of a CFP) must include the Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement on or with their timely filed (including extensions) original U.S. returns for their taxable years in which the transfer occurred.
(C) Transferor is not a person required to file a U.S. return, a CFC, or a CFP, but Acquiring is required to file U.S. return. If paragraphs (d)(3)(ii)(A) and (B) of this section do not apply and Acquiring is a person required to file a U.S. return for the year of the transfer, Acquiring must include the Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement on or with its timely filed (including extensions) original U.S. return for the taxable year in which the transfer occurred.
(D) Transferor is not a person required to file a U.S. return, a CFC, or a CFP, Acquiring is not required to file a U.S. return, but Acquiring is a CFC. If paragraphs (d)(3)(ii)(A) through (C) of this section do not apply and Acquiring is a CFC on the date of the transfer, all of Acquiring's controlling U.S. shareholders must include the Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement on or with their timely filed (including extensions) original U.S. returns for their taxable years in which the transfer occurred.
(E) Neither Transferor nor Acquiring is a person required to file a U.S. return, a CFC, or a CFP, but Transferor later becomes a person required to file a U.S. return, a CFC, or a CFP. If paragraphs (d)(3)(ii)(A) through (D) of this section do not apply and Transferor becomes a person required to file a U.S. return, a CFC, or a CFP, Transferor (if required to file a U.S. return), all of Transferor's controlling U.S. shareholders (if Transferor becomes a CFC not otherwise required to file a U.S. return), or all of Transferor's reporting U.S. partners (if Transferor becomes a CFP not otherwise required to file a U.S. return) must include the Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement on or with their timely filed (including extensions) original U.S. returns for their taxable years in which an event described in this paragraph (d)(3)(ii)(E) first occurs. For purposes of this paragraph (d)(3)(ii)(E), the term Transferor includes any person holding property with a basis determined directly or indirectly by reference to Transferor's basis in the Acquiring stock received in the transaction.
(F) Transferor is not and does not become a person required to file a U.S. return, a CFC, or a CFP, Acquiring is not, but later becomes either a person required to file a U.S. return, a CFC, or a CFP. If paragraphs (d)(3)(ii)(A) through (E) of this section do not apply and Acquiring becomes a person required to file a U.S. return, a CFC, or a CFP, Acquiring (if required to file a U.S. return), all of Acquiring's controlling U.S. shareholders (if Acquiring becomes a CFC not otherwise required to file a U.S. return), or all of Acquiring's reporting U.S. partners (if Acquiring becomes a CFP not otherwise required to file a U.S. return) must include the Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement on or with their timely filed (including extensions) original U.S. returns for their taxable years in which an event described in this paragraph (d)(3)(ii)(F) first occurs. For purposes of this paragraph (d)(3)(ii)(F), the term Acquiring includes any person holding property with a basis determined directly or indirectly by reference to Acquiring's basis in loss duplication property received in the transaction.
(G) Transferor and Acquiring are not and do not become a person required to file a U.S. return, a CFC, or a CFP, but the basis of the loss duplication property or Acquiring stock later becomes relevant for Federal tax purposes. If paragraphs (d)(3)(ii)(A) through (F) of this section do not apply and, in a transferred basis transaction, a person required to file a U.S. return, a CFC, or a CFP acquires either loss duplication property or Acquiring stock that was received in the loss duplication transaction, or any property the basis of which is determined in whole or in part by reference to any such property or stock, all such persons (or, in the case of a CFC or CFP not required to file a U.S. return, all the controlling U.S. shareholders or all the reporting U.S. partners, as applicable) must include the Section 362(e)(2)(C) Statement on or with their timely filed (including extensions) original U.S. returns for their first taxable year(s) in which there occurs an event or events described in this paragraph (d)(3)(ii)(G).
(e) Transfers by partnerships and S corporations—(1) Transfers by partnerships. If a partnership transfers property in a loss duplication transaction with respect to which a section 362(e)(2)(C) election is made, the resulting reduction to the partnership's basis in the Acquiring stock received in exchange for the loss duplication property is treated as an expenditure of the partnership described in section 705(a)(2)(B).
(2) Transfers by S corporations. If an S corporation transfers property in a loss duplication transaction with respect to which a section 362(e)(2)(C) election is made, the resulting reduction to the S corporation's basis in the Acquiring stock received in exchange for the loss duplication property is treated as an expense of the S corporation described in section 1367(a)(2)(D).
(f) Transfers to S corporations. If a person transfers property to an S corporation in a loss duplication transaction, any resulting reduction under section 362(e)(2) and this section to the S corporation's basis in the property received is not treated as an expense of the S corporation described in section 1367(a)(2)(D).
(g) Definitions. For purposes of section 362(e)(2) and this section—
(1) Loss duplication property is any property—
(i) That is transferred by Transferor to Acquiring in a loss duplication transaction (as defined in paragraph (g)(2) of this section); and
(ii) That Acquiring would take with a basis in excess of value immediately after the transaction; for this purpose, the basis Acquiring would take in the property is determined immediately after the transaction and without regard to section 362(e)(2) and this section, but otherwise taking into account all applicable provisions of law, including, without limitation, section 362(e)(1).
(2) A loss duplication transaction is a section 362(a) transaction in which Acquiring's aggregate basis in the property received from Transferor would, but for section 362(e)(2) and this section, exceed the aggregate value of such property immediately after the transaction. For this purpose—
(i) A transaction is a section 362(a) transaction if it is described in section 362(a) without regard to whether it is also described in any other provision of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), including, without limitation, section 362(b); and
(ii) Acquiring's aggregate basis in the property received from Transferor is determined immediately after the transaction and without regard to section 362(e)(2) and this section, but otherwise taking into account all applicable provisions of law, including, without limitation, section 362(e)(1).
(3) Transferor's net built-in loss is the excess of—
(i) Acquiring's aggregate basis (determined under paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this section) in all property received from Transferor in a loss duplication transaction, over
(ii) The aggregate value of such property immediately after the transaction.
(4) A property's built-in loss is the excess of Acquiring's basis in the property (determined as described in paragraph (g)(1)(ii) of this section) over the property's value (determined immediately after the transaction).
(5) A property's allocable portion of Transferor's net built-in loss is the portion of Transferor's net built-in loss that bears the same ratio to Transferor's net built-in loss that the property's built-in loss bears to the aggregate built-in losses reflected in the bases of loss duplication property transferred by Transferor in the transaction.
(6) A U.S. return is a return of income under section 6012 or an information return under Subtitle F, Chapter 61, Subchapter A, Part III of the Code (sections 6031 and following) or the regulations thereunder, that the taxpayer is unconditionally required to file. Thus, the term does not include elective forms or statements that are required to be filed only to obtain a particular tax treatment, including forms filed to make an election or to reduce or avoid withholding by a person not otherwise required to file a U.S. return (as described in this paragraph (g)(6)) (for example, a notice of nonrecognition under § 1.1445-2(d)).
(7) A controlled foreign corporation (CFC) is any corporation described in section 957 or section 953(c).
(8) A controlling U.S. shareholder is any person that is treated as a controlling U.S. shareholder under § 1.964-1(c)(5) because such person either owns a direct interest in the CFC or is treated as owning an interest in the CFC by reason of section 318(a)(2) (attribution from partnerships, estates, trusts, and corporations).
(9) A controlled foreign partnership (CFP) is any partnership treated as a controlled foreign partnership for purposes of section 6038.
(10) A reporting U.S. partner is any partner of a CFP that is required to file an information return with respect to the CFP pursuant to section 6038 or the regulations thereunder, without regard to § 1.6038-3(c) or (j). In addition, in applying the constructive ownership rules of § 1.6038-3(b)(4), the term “nonresident alien” is replaced by the term “individual.”
(11) The term stock means both Acquiring stock and Acquiring securities received by Transferor in the transaction if gain or loss on the receipt of the stock or securities is not recognized in whole or in part.
(12) Value—(i) General rule. The term value means fair market value.
(ii) Special rule for transfers of partnership interests. Notwithstanding the general rule in paragraph (g)(12)(i) of this section, when referring to a partnership interest, for purposes of section 362(e)(2) and this section, the term value means the sum of the cash that Acquiring would receive for the interest, assuming an exchange between a willing buyer and a willing seller (neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts), increased by any § 1.752-1 liabilities (as defined in § 1.752-1(a)(4)) of the partnership allocated to Acquiring with regard to such transferred interest under section 752 immediately after the transfer to Acquiring. See § 1.743-1 regarding the application of section 743(b) following a section 362(e) basis reduction.
(h) Examples. The examples in this paragraph (h) illustrate the application of section 362(e)(2) and the provisions of this section. Unless the facts otherwise indicate, the examples use the following nomenclature and assumptions: X, Y, P, S, S1, and S2 are domestic corporations; A and B are U.S. individuals; FC1 and FC2 are foreign corporations and are not engaged in a U.S. trade or business, have no U.S. real property interests, and have no other relationships, activities, or interests that would cause them, their shareholders, or their property to be subject to tax imposed under any provision of subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code (federal income tax); there is no applicable income tax treaty; PRS is a domestic partnership; no election is made under section 362(e)(2)(C); and the transferred property is not importation property (as defined in § 1.362-3(c)(2)) and the transfers are not loss importation transactions (as defined in § 1.362-3(c)(3)), so that the basis of no property is determined under section 362(e)(1). All persons and transactions are unrelated unless the facts indicate otherwise, all taxpayers are on a calendar tax year, and all other relevant facts are set forth in the examples. See § 1.362-3(f) for additional examples illustrating the application of section 362(e)(2) and this section, including to transactions that are subject to section 362(e)(2), and section 362(e)(1).
(i) [Reserved]
(j) Effective/applicability date. This section applies to transactions occurring after September 3, 2013, unless effected pursuant to a binding agreement that was in effect prior to September 3, 2013, and at all times thereafter. In addition, taxpayers may apply these regulations to transactions occurring after October 22, 2004. The introductory text and Example 11 of paragraph (h) of this section apply with respect to transactions occurring on or after March 28, 2016, and also with respect to transactions occurring before such date as a result of an entity classification election under § 301.7701-3 of this chapter filed on or after March 28, 2016, unless such transaction is pursuant to a binding agreement that was in effect prior to March 28, 2016 and at all times thereafter. In addition, taxpayers may apply such provisions to any transaction occurring after October 22, 2004.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-4(a)Purpose and scope—(1) In general.
Purpose and scope—(1) In general. The purpose of section 362(e)(2) and this section is to prevent the duplication of net loss in transfers to which section 351 applies, capital contributions, and paid-in surplus (each, a section 362(a) transaction). See paragraph (g) of this section for definitions of terms used in this section.
(2) Intercompany transactions. For rules relating to the application of section 362(e)(2) to transfers between members of a consolidated group on or after October 22, 2004, see § 1.1502-80(h).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-4(b)Basis determinations under section 362(e)(2) and this section.
Basis determinations under section 362(e)(2) and this section. Notwithstanding section 362(a), if a corporation (Acquiring) receives loss duplication property (as defined in paragraph (g)(1) of this section) from a person (Transferor) in a loss duplication transaction (as defined in paragraph (g)(2) of this section), Acquiring's basis in such property is equal to the basis of the property determined without regard to section 362(e)(2) and this section (as described in paragraph (g)(1)(ii) of this section), reduced by the property's allocable portion of Transferor's net built-in loss (as defined in paragraph (g)(3) of this section). If more than one Transferor transfers property to a corporation in a section 362(a) transaction, whether and the extent to which section 362(e)(2) and this section apply is determined separately for each Transferor.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-4(c)Exceptions and special rules—(1) Transactions in which net built-in loss is eliminated without recognition.
Exceptions and special rules—(1) Transactions in which net built-in loss is eliminated without recognition. Section 362(e)(2) does not apply to a transaction to the extent that—
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-4(d)Election to reduce Transferor's stock basis instead of Acquiring's asset basis—(1) In general.
Election to reduce Transferor's stock basis instead of Acquiring's asset basis—(1) In general. In lieu of making the basis reductions otherwise required under paragraph (b) of this section, Transferor and Acquiring may elect to reduce Transferor's basis in Acquiring stock that is received in the transaction without the recognition of gain or loss (the section 362(e)(2)(C) election). The section 362(e)(2)(C) election may be made protectively and will have no effect to the extent that property transferred in the transaction is determined not to be subject to section 362(e)(2) and this section. However, the election is irrevocable once it is made. A section 362(e)(2)(C) election is made and effective if—
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-4(e)Transfers by partnerships and S corporations—(1) Transfers by partnerships.
Transfers by partnerships and S corporations—(1) Transfers by partnerships. If a partnership transfers property in a loss duplication transaction with respect to which a section 362(e)(2)(C) election is made, the resulting reduction to the partnership's basis in the Acquiring stock received in exchange for the loss duplication property is treated as an expenditure of the partnership described in section 705(a)(2)(B).
(2) Transfers by S corporations. If an S corporation transfers property in a loss duplication transaction with respect to which a section 362(e)(2)(C) election is made, the resulting reduction to the S corporation's basis in the Acquiring stock received in exchange for the loss duplication property is treated as an expense of the S corporation described in section 1367(a)(2)(D).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-4(f)Transfers to S corporations.
Transfers to S corporations. If a person transfers property to an S corporation in a loss duplication transaction, any resulting reduction under section 362(e)(2) and this section to the S corporation's basis in the property received is not treated as an expense of the S corporation described in section 1367(a)(2)(D).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-4(g)Definitions.
Definitions. For purposes of section 362(e)(2) and this section—
(1) Loss duplication property is any property—
-
Treas. Reg. §1.362-4(h)Examples.
Examples. The examples in this paragraph (h) illustrate the application of section 362(e)(2) and the provisions of this section. Unless the facts otherwise indicate, the examples use the following nomenclature and assumptions: X, Y, P, S, S1, and S2 are domestic corporations; A and B are U.S. individuals; FC1 and FC2 are foreign corporations and are not engaged in a U.S. trade or business, have no U.S. real property interests, and have no other relationships, activities, or interests that would cause them, their shareholders, or their property to be subject to tax imposed under any provision of subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code (federal income tax); there is no applicable income tax treaty; PRS is a domestic partnership; no election is made under section 362(e)(2)(C); and the transferred property is not importation property (as defined in § 1.362-3(c)(2)) and the transfers are not loss importation transactions (as defined in § 1.362-3(c)(3)), so that the basis of no property is determined under section 362(e)(1). All persons and transactions are unrelated unless the facts indicate otherwise, all taxpayers are on a calendar tax year, and all other relevant facts are set forth in the examples. See § 1.362-3(f) for additional examples illustrating the application of section 362(e)(2) and this section, including to transactions that are subject to section 362(e)(2), and section 362(e)(1).
149 Citing Cases
Section 362 deals only with the basis of certain property to a corporation. The basis adjustment under section 362(c) has no bearing on whether the disbursement of grant proceeds by Empire State to petitioner qualified as a nonshareholder contribution to capital under section 118(a). To the contrary, Congress implied that money 16 contributed to a
Unlike the taxpayers in those cases, petitioners are not challenging the appropriateness of the imposition of the 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) automatic stay; rather, we are focused exclusively on determining whether an automatic stay that has been properly applied under 11 U.S.C.
By including the $7 million debt in its basis for Orland Park, SRI underreported its income on the sale ofthe subdivision lots for 2005 and 2006. Petitioners argue that ifwe recharacterize the land transfer as a capital contribution, the income resulting from the sale ofthe subdivision lots should be taxed as capital gain under section 12
By including the $7 million debt in its basis for Orland Park, SRI underreported its income on the sale ofthe subdivision lots for 2005 and 2006. Petitioners argue that ifwe recharacterize the land transfer as a capital contribution, the income resulting from the sale ofthe subdivision lots should be taxed as capital gain under section 12
By including the $7 million debt in its basis for Orland Park, SRI underreported its income on the sale ofthe subdivision lots for 2005 and 2006. Petitioners argue that ifwe recharacterize the land transfer as a capital contribution, the income resulting from the sale ofthe subdivision lots should be taxed as capital gain under section 12
By including the $7 million debt in its basis for Orland Park, SRI underreported its income on the sale ofthe subdivision lots for 2005 and 2006. Petitioners argue that ifwe recharacterize the land transfer as a capital contribution, the income resulting from the sale ofthe subdivision lots should be taxed as capital gain under section 12
By including the $7 million debt in its basis for Orland Park, SRI underreported its income on the sale ofthe subdivision lots for 2005 and 2006. Petitioners argue that ifwe recharacterize the land transfer as a capital contribution, the income resulting from the sale ofthe subdivision lots should be taxed as capital gain under section 12
362 is still in effect because his bankruptcy was - 12 - [*12] reopened and (2) the additional $8,334 assessed for 2009 had not been previously assessed and was not stipulated in his case at docket No. 1146-12. Petitioner requested that he be awarded (1) "costs in connection with the filing of this petition" and (2) "the attorneys fees I have
(b) The tax basis for the Assets transferred from Parent to Sub- sidiary in the Contribution was a carryovertax basis in accordance with Section 362 ofthe Code.
(b) The tax basis for the Assets transferred from Parent to Sub- sidiary in the Contribution was a carryovertax basis in accordance with Section 362 ofthe Code.
(b) The tax basis for the Assets transferred from Parent to Sub- sidiary in the Contribution was a carryovertax basis in accordance with Section 362 ofthe Code.
362(a). Therefore, because 11 U.S.C. sec. 362(a) does not apply to petitioner, respondent's collectionaction was not subject to a bankruptcy stay.
_ 9 _ [*9] than that listed by petitioner on his Form 433-A (i.e., $5,535). Thus, the Table reflected monthly disposable income of$8,279 (i.e., $14,721 minus $6,442). On September 12, 2013, the SO faxed the Table with explanation to petitioner's representative and stated: Ifyou wish a collection alternative or want to supply addit
However, section 358(e) provides that section 358(a) does not apply to property acquired by a corporation by the exchange ofits stock as consideration in whole or in part for the transfer ofproperty to it.
led to appear at the face-to-face hearings. We therefore find no merit to petitioner's argument. B. Challenges to the Collection Action Petitioner asserts that respondent disregarded the automatic stay provision of the Bankruptcy Code. See 11 U.S.C.,sec. 362 (2006). We disagree. The .automatic stay.generally remains in effect until the earliest ofthe closing ofthe case, the - 18 - dismissal ofthe case, or the grant or denial ofa discharge. Id. sec. 362(c)(2); Prevo v. Commissioner, 123 T.C. 326,
That is ecause, according to respondent, the Ralphs transaction qualifies as a .reorganization under section 368 (a) (1),(B) , (C) ,- and (G) , and consequently RHC has' a carryover basis u der section 362 in t respective Ralphs common stock that its received from Holdings III and Allied., See sec.
That is ecause, according to respondent, the Ralphs transaction qualifies as a .reorganization under section 368 (a) (1),(B) , (C) ,- and (G) , and consequently RHC has' a carryover basis u der section 362 in t respective Ralphs common stock that its received from Holdings III and Allied., See sec.
(b) The tax basis for the ¯Canadian currency transferred from Parent to Subsidiary in the Contribu- tion was a carryover tax basis in accordance with Section 362 of the [Internal Revenue] Code.
362 (2000) as to any action that he took with respect to the subject liability . We likewise find no such action that violated the automatic stay . Cf . Beverly V. Commissioner , T .C . Memo . 2005-41 (holding that a notice of intent to levy was invalid where .it was issued in violation of the automatic stay and that the Commissioner was there
section 362 separately. The so-called “exploding stay” of paragraph (3) appeared first in H.R. 3150, 105th Cong. (1998), entitled the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1998, introduced February 3, 1998; and paragraph (4) first appeared eight months later in the House conference report to H.R. 3150 on October 7, 1998. See H. Rept. 105-540, at 54 (1998); H. C
14, 2005, this amendment does not apply here .
tomatic stay of Tax Court proceedings concerning the debtor. Actions which are'subject to the automatic stay are set forth in 11 U.S.C. section 362(a). At the time Mr. Kovitch filed for bankruptcy, 11 U.S.C. section 362(a) provided in relevant part: § 362. Automatic stay (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition filed under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or an application filed under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, operates a
362(a)(8) (2000) does not apply to this proceeding .
Those findings and conclusions stated in pertinent part : 6 . Debtors [Mr . Hassell and Ms . Hassell] have for several years been involved in contentious litiga- tion with the IRS . In this Court, the Debtors have been uncooperative in discovery, have launched personal attacks on government counsel, and have begun to advance theories of
362 (b) (9) (D) (2000) . - 13 - (1994). Personal income taxes are due on the date the return is required to be filed. Sec. 6151(a); Holywell Corp. v. Smith, 503 U.S. 47, 58 (1992); Pan Am. Van Lines v. United States, 607 F.2d 1299, 1301 (9th Cir. 1979). Because the liability for the 1994 income tax arose .after the commencement of the case in
362 (b) (9) (D) (1994) . Because petitioner filed for bankruptcy on Apr. 7, 1994, the 1994 amendment to the bankruptcy code is inapplicable. 5 There are no Tax Court cases which define when a claim arises for income taxes in bankruptcy proceedings. I - 6 - Petitioner argues the Internal Revenue Service has a contemporaneous right to the payme
362 applied to petitioner as well as Barbara Drake, and that 11 U.S.C. sec. 1301 precluded any collection action against either Barbara Drake or petitioner. On October 27, 2003, Appeals Officer Kaplan requested legal advice from Attorney Forbes concerning the preclusion of any collection action against petitioner. Attorney Forbes advised that
section 362 (2000) and the collection review procedures established under sections 6320 and 6330. The Automatic Stay Title 11 of the United States Code provides uniform procedures designed to promote the effective rehabilitation of the bankrupt debtor and, when necessary, the equitable distribution of his or her assets. See H. Rept. 95-595, at 340
362(h) (2000); see also Meadows v. Commissioner, 95 AFTR 2d 2005-1785, 2005-1 USTC par. 50274 (11th Cir. 2005) (citing Langlois v. United States, 155 Bankr. 818 (N.D.N.Y. 1993)) (sitting in bankruptcy jurisdiction and holding that the IRS’s application of a collected amount to penalties that were to be discharged in bankruptcy was a violation
month pursuant to the terms noted above. Pursuant to the Amended Order and Social Security Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-647, sec. 459, 88 Stat. 2357, amended by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-193, sec. 362, 110 Stat. 2242, codified at 42 U.S.C. sec. 659 (2000),4 the Defense Finance and Accounting 4The United States is required to withhold moneys due from the United States to any individual, including members of the Armed Forces, to enforce the
section 362 (2000) bars the commencement of a proceeding with the Court pursuant to the collection review procedures established under section 6320. -5- Before proceeding with our analysis, we briefly review both the automatic stay provisions and the collection review procedures. The Automatic Stay Title 11 of the United States Code provides unifo
Whether respondent violated the automatic stay under section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code2 by auditing petitioner’s Forms 1040, U.S.
§362 is retroactively modified in favor of the United States of America (IRS) to permit the United States Tax Court to take all steps necessary to enter a Decision in Docket No. 26995-93 and conclude its case and to permit the IRS to assess the debtor's additional tax liabilities for the years 1989, 1990 and 1991. Since this Court had previously en
- 18 - Interlake v. Commissioner On March 18, 1999, the Court decided Interlake Corp. v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 103 (1999), on cross-motions for summary judgment. In the stipulation of facts and stipulation of settled issues in that case, the parties thereto, namely, Interlake and respondent, agreed that Interlake was the commo
The insurance claim survived the bankruptcy proceedings and remained an asset of BFI as of the close of the 1995 tax year. In those proceedings, the insurance claim was assigned a zero value. However, a disclosure statement dated Aug. 22, 1994, noted that “debtor believes that perhaps as much as $1 - 4 million could be recovered on
362 (1994) from the accuracy- related penalty for negligence. As a general rule, the filing of a petition in bankruptcy operates to stay the commencement or continuation of any action or proceeding against the debtor. 11 U.S.C. sec. 362(a) (1994). However, 11 U.S.C. sec. 362(b)(9) (1994) provides an exception to the automatic stay for audits c
362 (1994); Freytag v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. 35, 39 (1998). -- 2255 -- IV. Conclusion Congress enacted the TEFRA partnership provisions to separate the determination of partnership items from the determination of nonpartnership items. Nevertheless, it bears remembering that the partnership pays no tax, and it is the partners’ tax liabilities
In December 1994, Wells Fargo moved the bankruptcy court for relief from the automatic stay and requested permission to conduct a trustee’s sale of petitioner’s San Francisco residence. Petitioner opposed the relief from stay on the ground that the property had a value substantially greater than the outstanding debt. On January 23,
362 (1994); Freytag v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. 35, 39 (1998).
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Respondent subsequently filed an amended answer to the corporation's amendment to petition, responding that the appropriate amount of the section 362 adjustment was either $280,477 or the actual amount of net capital gain ultimately recognized by the Bowdens on the transfer of assets to the corporation.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings rea ized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
Thus, it is asserted that Decision Holdings, under section 362, had a carryover of TG's basis in the assets the limited partnership transferred to it, so that Decision Holdings realized a $1,073,835 loss on the sale of those assets to Autochthon.
505(c) (1994) provides: Notwithstanding section 362 of this title, after determination by the [bankruptcy] court of a tax under this section, the governmental unit charged with responsibility for collection of such tax may assess such tax against the estate, the debtor, or a successor to the debtor, as the case may be, subject to any otherwise applicable law.
An order granting relief from an automatic stay provided by section 362 * * * shall be [one of the] additional exceptions to Rule 62(a)." Fed.
505(c) (1994) provides: Notwithstanding section 362 of this title, after determination by the [bankruptcy] court of a tax under this section, the governmental unit charged with responsibility for collection of such tax may assess such tax against the estate, the debtor, or a successor to the debtor, as the case may be, subject to any otherwise applicable law.
An order granting relief from an automatic stay provided by section 362 * * * shall be [one of the] additional exceptions to Rule 62(a).” Fed.
362 (1994) on or about May 16, 1989, for the purpose of filing a petition and proceeding in the Tax court. - 27 - these mortgages is on the property where Ted’s Nursery had been, across the street from the Kenmore location. Gleave’s bankruptcy petition indicates that he was paid $550 per month ($6,600 per year) on this mortgage. Kenmore’s ban
d in the amount of gain recognized to the transferor on such transfer. The applicability of section 351 to the Kolonaki/GRS exchange is not in controversy. Similarly, it is not disputed that Kolonaki controlled GRS after the exchange as required by section 362. The use of fair market value by GRS to determine the basis of the assets is inappropriate. The present facts fit squarely within the language of the Code. Therefore, we sustain respondent's determination that the value of the opening inve
d in the amount of gain recognized to the transferor on such transfer. The applicability of section 351 to the Kolonaki/GRS exchange is not in controversy. Similarly, it is not disputed that Kolonaki controlled GRS after the exchange as required by section 362. The use of fair market value by GRS to determine the basis of the assets is inappropriate. The present facts fit squarely within the language of the Code. Therefore, we sustain respondent's determination that the value of the opening inve
d in the amount of gain recognized to the transferor on such transfer. The applicability of section 351 to the Kolonaki/GRS exchange is not in controversy. Similarly, it is not disputed that Kolonaki controlled GRS after the exchange as required by section 362. The use of fair market value by GRS to determine the basis of the assets is inappropriate. The present facts fit squarely within the language of the Code. Therefore, we sustain respondent's determination that the value of the opening inve