§371

383 cases·58 followed·8 distinguished·7 questioned·1 criticized·1 limited·48 overruled·260 cited15% support

Statute text not available for this section.

383 Citing Cases

QUEST. Douglas E. Hampton, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2025-32 · 2025

§ 1366(a) (providing that an S corporation shareholder shall take into account his pro rata share of, among other things, the corporation’s loss for the tax year).13 Even if we assume that HCM was entitled to claim a deduction for the asset seizures (a question we need not decide here), Mr.

FOLLOWED Aldrich H. Ames, Petitioner 112 T.C. No. 20 · 1999

We hold that petitioner is liable for the section 6662(a) negligence penalty in each of the taxable years 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992.

Ames v. Commissioner 112 T.C. 304 · 1999

On April 28, 1994, petitioner pleaded guilty to both counts of the indictment. The indictment contained a criminal forfeiture count pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 794(d). Petitioner was sentenced to life imprisonment on the espionage charge and to 27 months’ imprisonment on the tax charge, the two sentences to run concurrently. In addition, t

Lawrence Leroy Henry, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2024-79 · 2024

We do not consider here Ms. Hunter-Henry’s failure to timely file a return, but only Mr. Henry’s failure. We do not consider false deductions claimed on or omissions of income from the returns that the Henrys eventually, belatedly, filed in April 2019, but only Mr. Henry’s failure to file returns for 2011–2014 when they were due in the succe

Thomas Shands, Petitioner 160 T.C. No. 5 · 2023

The DOJ announced Mr. Gadola’s guilty plea in a December 2010 press release, and the story received media coverage in 2010 and 2011. In February 2011 the IRS announced OVDI, its second offshore voluntary disclosure program and a counterpart to CI’s longstanding practice of allowing taxpayers to avoid criminal prosecution by disclosing noncom

Monty Ervin, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2021-75 · 2021

371, attempting to evade or defeat tax in violation of section 7201, and aiding and abetting the same in violation of 18 U.S.C. sec. 2. The indictment charged that petitioner and his wife “did willfully attempt to evade and defeat the income tax due and owing * * * by failing to make an income tax return” for 2004-2006. The alleged overt acts

John M. Crim, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2021-117 · 2021

371, and for a corrupt endeavor to interfere with the administration of the internal revenue laws, in violation of section 7212(a). In 2008 he was convicted of these crimes and sentenced to prison, where he remained until his release in 2014. See United States v. Crim, No. 06-CR-00658-1 (E.D. Pa. 2008), aff’d in part, 451 F. App’x 196 (3d Cir.

371, aiding and assisting in the preparation of false tax documents in violation of section 7206(2), and attempting to obstruct and impede the administration of the internal revenue laws in violation of section 7212(a). The indictment charged that petitioner “did willfully aid and assist in * * * the preparation * * * [of income tax returns] t

371 and one count of "corruptly endeavor[ing] to obstruct and impede the due administration ofthe internal revenue laws" in violation ofsection 7212(a) for the years at issue. With respect to the latter count, the indictment alleged that petitioner violated section 7212(a) by (1) hiding gross receipts generated by Number One Foundations from h

371 (2006) for acts occurring between 1996 and 2006; seven counts oftax evasion under section 7201 for tax years 2000 through 2006; two counts ofsubscribing a false tax return in violation ofsection 7206(1) for tax years 1998 and 2000; and six counts offailing to file tax returns or supply information under section 7203 for tax years 2001 thro

371 (2006), ten counts ofassisting in the preparation offalse tax documents in violation ofsection 7206(2), and one count ofcorruptly endeavoring to obstruct and impede the administration ofthe tax laws in violation ofsection 7212(a). He was convicted on all counts on November 4, 2010. On March 17, 2011, petitionerwas sentenced to imprisonment

371 by fraudulently claiming EDC credits in the Virgin Islands). The IRS wants returns on the forms it prescribes, and it got that form--at least a good part ofit--here. There is no question that the IRS was clueless about how to handle what it got--but the undisputed facts show that the IRS was able to stamp it received, summarize its content

371 by fraudulently claiming EDC credits in the Virgin Islands). The IRS wants returns on the forms it prescribes, and it got that form--at least a good part ofit--here. There is no question that the IRS was clueless about how to handle what it got--but the undisputed facts show that the IRS was able to stamp it received, summarize its content

371 by fraudulently claiming EDC credits in the Virgin Islands). The IRS wants returns on the forms it prescribes, and it got that form--at least a good part ofit--here. There is no question that the IRS was clueless about how to handle what it got--but the undisputed facts show that the IRS was able to stamp it received, summarize its content

371 by fraudulently claiming EDC credits in the Virgin Islands). The IRS wants returns on the forms it prescribes, and it got that form--at least a good part ofit--here. There is no question that the IRS was clueless about how to handle what it got--but the undisputed facts show that the IRS was able to stamp it received, summarize its content

371 with respect to a false corporate income tax return (i.e., Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return) that he filed on or about March 31, 1992, on behalfofBranch International Services, 70 percent of the stock ofwhich he and Ms. Garavaglia owned at the time he filed that false return (sometimes, tax fraud charges). In addition, Mr. Gar

deposited into BAC's bank account. Petitioners' Illegal Activities and Guilty Pleas On December 9, 2004, petitioners were indicted by a Federal grandjury on several counts relating to tax evasion in violation ofsection 7201 and 18 U.S.C. - 9 - [*9] sec. 371, and misappropriation ofIndian tribal funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. secs. 1163 and 1168. On October 24, 2006, petitioners pleaded guilty to the charges but withdrew their pleas on the day ofsentencing. In October 2007, after a criminal tria

deposited into BAC's bank account. Petitioners' Illegal Activities and Guilty Pleas On December 9, 2004, petitioners were indicted by a Federal grandjury on several counts relating to tax evasion in violation ofsection 7201 and 18 U.S.C. - 9 - [*9] sec. 371, and misappropriation ofIndian tribal funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. secs. 1163 and 1168. On October 24, 2006, petitioners pleaded guilty to the charges but withdrew their pleas on the day ofsentencing. In October 2007, after a criminal tria

By letter dated October 29, 2010, petitioner made a payment of$387,687 to the Department ofthe Treasury. The payment was calculated by the U.S. Probation Department as the tax loss for 1998 in United States v. Rozin, No. 1:05- cr-000139 SJD-1 (S.D. Ohio). On January 6, 2012, the U.S. Court ofAppeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed thejudgm

371, and attempting to interfere with the administration ofinternal revenue laws, sec. 7212(a); 18 U.S.C. sec. 2. Pursuant to a plea agreement signed March 14, 2007, Mr. Howell pleaded guilty to both counts ofthe indictment. CID Special Agents Robert Miranda and Steven Ashcroft were assigned primary responsibility for the later CID investigati

On October 31, 2011, the U.S. District Court, inter alia, sentenced petitioner to 36 months in prison with two years ofsupervised release. Respondent issued a notice ofdeficiency (notice) to petitioner with respect to his taxable years 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007. In that notice, respondent determined the following deficiencies

371 and paid $74,131,694 in tax restitution, a criminal fine, and *This Opinion supplements our previously filed Opinion, Whistleblower 21276-13W v. Commissioner, 144 T.C. 290 (2015). SERVED Aug 03 2016 - 2 - civil forfeitures to the Government. The parties agree that the tax restitution payment constitutes collected proceeds for purposes of

371 and paid $74,131,694 in tax restitution, a criminal fine, and *This Opinion supplements our previously filed Opinion, Whistleblower 21276-13W v. Commissioner, 144 T.C. 290 (2015). SERVED Aug 03 2016 - 2 - civil forfeitures to the Government. The parties agree that the tax restitution payment constitutes collected proceeds for purposes of

The grandjury charged that petitioner and 10 codefendants were involved in an organization that conducted sales seminars throughout the United States and solicited clients for fraudulent offshore and domestic trust packages by falsely representing that taxpayers could lawfully avoid paying Federal income tax by placing income and assets i

United States v. Navaid, No. 06-CR-56-1 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 13, 2006) (sentencing order). Petitioner was sentenced to 18 months in prison and three years ofsupervised release. In addition, petitioner wasjointly and severally liable, along with his two codefendants, for restitution of$670,000 to be paid for the benefit ofthe Department

371 (2000) and 26 U.S.C. sec. 7212(a) (2000), respectively. 5The record indicates that Mr. Sweet and Mr. Scott were not involved in any administration ofthe trust besides signing the trust contract, appointing a trustee, and directing the capital units to petitioner's relatives. Although petitionermet with Mr. Sweetto initiate the trust, petit

Joseph E. & Mary A. Laciny, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2013-107 · 2013

371 (2000), filing false - 5 - [*5] individual income tax returns for tax years 1998 and 1999, filing false corporate income tax returns for fiscal years ended March 31, 1998 and 1999, under section 7206(1), and aiding and abetting under title 18 U.S.C. sec. 2. On October 12, 2006, Mrs. Laciny signed a plea agreement, attached to which was a

Laura R. Ames-Mechelke, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2013-176 · 2013

371 by promoting, marketing, and selling abusive trusts. In January 2002 Larson entered into a plea agreement with the United States and pleaded guilty to, inter alia, conspiring to defraud the IRS in violation of 18 U.S.C. sec. 371 and subscribing false and fraudulent income tax returns in violation ofsection 7206(1). After ajury trial in 200

Laura R. Ames-Mechelke, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2013-176 · 2013

371 by promoting, marketing, and selling abusive trusts. In January 2002 Larson entered into a plea agreement with the United States and pleaded guilty to, inter alia, conspiring to defraud the IRS in violation of 18 U.S.C. sec. 371 and subscribing false and fraudulent income tax returns in violation ofsection 7206(1). After ajury trial in 200

Lawrence L. Kibler, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-306 · 2012

371 to defraud the United States, committing tax evasion, and making false and fraudulent tax returns. HVB ultimately entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the U.S. Department ofJustice on February 13, 2006. See Gustashawv. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2011-195, aff'd, __ F.3d __, 2012 WL 4465190 (11th Cir. Sept. 28, 2012); Sussex Fin

Mary Ann T. Garavaglia, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-228 · 2011

371, making and subscribing false individual and corporate income tax returns in violation of section 7206(1), and willful failure to file heavy vehicle use tax forms in violation of section 7203. The indictment also charged that Mr. Garavaglia's fraudulent activities began in the latter part of 1988 and continued until April 1992. B. Plea Agr

to four counts of filing false tax returns in violation of section 7206(1), one count for each of the years at issue.3 After trial in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Stone was convicted of conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C.m sec. 371, acceptance of payment by a public official in violation of 18 U.S.C. sec. 201(c) (1) (B), and five counts of submission of false claims in violation of 18 U.S.C. sec. 287. The court sentenced him to 7 years ln prlson. 3Under sec. 7206(1), a

cal years 9006 through 9206 ; and that you willfully evaded your personal income tax liabilities by subscribing to false Federal individual income tax returns for the years 1989 through 1992, The violations alleged are Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 ;. Title 26, Internal Revenue Code, Section 7-206(1) ; and Title 26, Internal Revenue Code, Section 7201 - 136 - On June 26, 1996, Martin Gelfand spoke with, Carol Muranaka, an attorney in the Office of District Counsel, Western Region, an

HI-Q Personnel, Inc., Petitioner 132 T.C. No. 13 · 2009

ixteen in total, in taxable years 1995 through 1998,] which substantially misrepresented the wages paid to I Hi-Q Personnel employees , each filing constituting a separate overt act .* * * 1 1 . 1 All in violation of Title 18 , ~C7nited States Code, Section 371 . * [COUNTS TWO THROUGH TEN (FAILURE TO COLLECT, ACCOUNT FOR AND PA OVER EMPLOYMENT TAXES) , i THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THATI: 1 . Paragraphs 1 through 6 of ount One are incorporated herein as if.fully set forth. 2 . [For the taxabl

371, Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States; counts 2 through 10 of the indictment charge violations of section 7202, Willful Failure To Collect or Pay Over Tax, and 18 U.S.C. sec. 2, Principals (viz., one who aids and abets the commission of an offense against the United States is punishable as a principal). In pertinent par

James A. Matthews, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2008-126 · 2008

section 371, arising from the preparation and filing of Superior ' s corporate income tax returns for TYE 1995 and TYE 1996 . On February 1 , 2002, a waiver of indictment and a crimi al information were filed against Mr . Matthews in the U .S . D 'strict Court for the Northern District of Mississippi in conn ction with his involvement in the prepar

section 371 (conspiracy to commit an offense against or defraud the United States), two counts of violating 18 U.S.C. section 152(1) (concealment of assets in bankruptcy), two counts of violating 18 U.S.C. section 152(3) (false declaration and statement in bankruptcy), and one count of violating section 7201 (attempted evasion of payment of tax). W

§371; tax evasion, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §7201; and making false federal income tax returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §7206(1). Prior to trial, Million and Flannery pleaded guilty and agreed to testify for the prosecution. Gricco and McCardell proceeded to trial. The jury found Gricco and McCardell guilty on all counts. The government submitte

Letantia Bussell, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2005-77 · 2005

371 of conspiracy; (2) three counts under 18 U.S.C. secs. 2 and 152(1) of concealing assets in bankruptcy; (3) two counts under 18 U.S.C. secs. 2 and 152(3) of making a false declaration and statement in bankruptcy; (4) one count under 18 U.S.C. sec. 152(2) of making a false oath and account in relation to a case under title 11; (4) one count

Thomas Rice, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2003-208 · 2003

371, and (2) two counts of bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. sec. 1014.6 Petitioner’s criminal conviction stemmed from his practice of opening interest-bearing bank accounts under false names, addresses, and Social Security numbers in an attempt to conceal his financial activities. Despite petitioner’s awareness of the requirements to file

Capital Video Corporation, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-40 · 2002

Guarino was also charged with conspiracy to bribe a union official under 18 U.S.C. sec. 1954 (2000), with interstate transportation of obscene material through use of a common carrier under 18 U.S.C. sec. 1462 (2000), and with aiding and abetting an offense against the United States under 18 U.S.C. sec. 2 (2000). On March 1, 1996,

371, by impeding and defeating the ascertainment and collection of income taxes. The indictment alleged that Mr. Mayer was a promoter of “domestic contractual trusts” also known as “Business Trust Organizations”; it also alleged that as one of the overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy Mr. Mayer counseled taxpayers to use the address “P.O

Darlow T. Madge, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2000-370 · 2000

Petitioner failed to present any evidence that the amounts of income and deductions determined in the statutory notice are - 3 - erroneous. He argues merely that he has been denied due process because he was not permitted at the administrative level to argue his theories that his income is not taxable. By reason of his failure to present

Martin & Barbara Schachter, Petitioner 113 T.C. No. 14 · 1999

section 371 (1988) to defraud the United States with respect to his individual Federal income tax liability for 1986. In connection with the above plea, under the authority of 18 U.S.C. sections 3622 and 3623 (Supp. II, 1984), now repealed and replaced by 18 U.S.C. sections 3572 and 3571 (1994), respectively, a Federal District Court judge sentence

William Grant Lee, Petitioner 113 T.C. No. 10 · 1999

section 371 and for willfully aiding or assisting in the preparation or presentation of returns which were false or fraudulent in violation of section 7206(2). The criminal cases against Mr. Kilpatrick and Mr. O'Donnell began in 1982 and continued through December 1989. This included (1) an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit,

Jerry L. Harvey, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-229 · 1999

See United States v. Harvey, 900 F.2d 1253 (8th Cir. 1990). At the time of his arrest, petitioner had $29,800 of U.S. currency in his possession, along with three cashier's checks totaling $250,000. The checks were payable to Jerry L. Harvey, and the purchaser of the checks was Bill Walker & Associates. Shortly after petitioner's arrest i

Lee v. Commissioner 113 T.C. 145 · 1999

section 371 and for willfully aiding or assisting in the preparation or presentation of returns which were false or fraudulent in violation of section 7206(2). The criminal cases against Mr. Kilpatrick and Mr. O’Donnell began in 1982 and continued through December 1989. This included (1) an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit,

Schachter v. Commissioner 113 T.C. 192 · 1999

section 371 (1988) to defraud the United States with respect to his individual Federal income tax liability for 1986. In connection with the above plea, under the authority of 18 U.S.C. sections 3622 and 3623 (Supp. II 1984), now repealed and replaced by 18 U.S.C. sections 3572 and 3571 (1994), respectively, a Federal District Court judge sentenced

Robert E. Iles & Monica M. Iles, Petitioners T.C. Memo. 1998-337 · 1998

371 (1994); (2) 133 counts of aiding and assisting in the preparation of false tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. sec. 7206(2); (3) one count of willfully filing an income tax return which was false as to a material fact (petitioners' 1980 tax return) in violation of 26 U.S.C. sec. 7206(1); and (4) two counts of willfully failing to file in

Lonnie C. Christensen, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1998-375 · 1998

The jurisdiction of the Tax Court derives from section 7442 and is statutory. Stamm Intl. Corp. v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 248, 253 n.12 (1985). A taxpayer has two basic options after receiving a notice of deficiency. One is to petition the Tax Court before payment of the tax, and the other is to pay the tax and sue for a refund in a Dis

Donald J. & Lillian Joy Miravalle, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-508 · 1997

371 (1994) by attempting to evade and defeat the income tax they owed in violation of section 7201. This Court issued its opinion in the civil case for those taxable years in Miravalle v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-49. Respondent's Determination Using information contained in petitioners' bank records, respondent determined the following wi

Kenneth A. Weiner, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-387 · 1997

§371, and filing false income tax returns under 26 U.S.C. §7206(1) for the years 1984 and 1985 * * *. * * * * * * * 6. The petitioner's objective [in conducting the investment scheme] was to defraud the United States by conducting the financial and banking activities of the investment scheme in a manner which was not readily traceable, by failing t

Bernhard F. & Cynthia G. Manko, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-510 · 1997

Petitioner's conviction and sentence were affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. United States v. Manko, 979 F.2d 900 (2d Cir. 1992). The Supreme Court denied certiorari. 509 U.S. 903 (1993). In August 1995, petitioner filed a petition to the District Court to vacate his conviction, presenting newly discovered ev

Jeff A. Wiltzius, Transferee, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-117 · 1997

section 371 with respect to his personal income tax returns. Bruce Hinshelwood (Hinshelwood), an assistant U.S. attorney, represented the United States, Marc L. Lubet (Lubet) represented Wiltzius, and Mark H. Randall represented Waldorf in their criminal cases. Lubet and Hinshelwood negotiated the amount of restitution that Wiltzius was to pay the

. This 10-year carryback includes product liability and tort losses and nuclear decommissioning expenses. Sec. 172(f)(1), (3). The 10-year carryback was enacted for product liability losses in 1978. Sec. 172(j); Revenue Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95- 600, sec. 371(b), 92 Stat. 2859. It was extended to specified liability and tort liability losses and costs of decommissioning nuclear power plants (section 172(k)) in 1984. Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 (DEFRA), Pub. L. 98-369, sec. 91(d)(2), 98 Stat. 60

Edward A. & Barbara Wagner, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-355 · 1996

371 (1994); (2) thirteen counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. sec. 1341 (1994); (3) twenty-nine counts of aiding and assisting in the preparation of false tax returns in violation of section 7206(2); and (4) one count of knowingly making and subscribing a false and fraudulent personal income tax return in violation of section 7206(1)

. This 10-year carryback includes product liability and tort losses and nuclear decommissioning expenses. Sec. 172(f)(1), (3). The 10-year carryback was enacted for product liability losses in 1978. Sec. 172(j); Revenue Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95- 600, sec. 371(b), 92 Stat. 2859. It was extended to specified liability and tort liability losses and costs of decommissioning nuclear power plants (section 172(k)) in 1984. Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 (DEFRA), Pub. L. 98-369, sec. 91(d)(2), 98 Stat. 60

AMW Investments, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-235 · 1996

The remaining counts charged Mr. Mohney with filing false individual income tax returns for the 1981, 1982, and 1983 taxable years (see sec. 7206(1)), and with aiding and assisting in the filing of false corporate income tax returns on behalf of Otis Mohney, Inc./International Amusements, Ltd. (see sec. 7206(2)). The remaining counts stem

. This 10-year carryback includes product liability and tort losses and nuclear decommissioning expenses. Sec. 172(f)(1), (3). The 10-year carryback was enacted for product liability losses in 1978. Sec. 172(j); Revenue Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95- 600, sec. 371(b), 92 Stat. 2859. It was extended to specified liability and tort liability losses and costs of decommissioning nuclear power plants (section 172(k)) in 1984. Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 (DEFRA), Pub. L. 98-369, sec. 91(d)(2), 98 Stat. 60

William Kale, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-197 · 1996

371 (1994) and one count of aiding and abetting the bribery of a public official under 18 U.S.C. sec. 201(b) (1994). In count one of the indictment the grand jury charged petitioner of conspiring with Toll and Suval to defraud the United States. The object of the conspiracy was for petitioner and Suval to receive bribes from Toll in return for

. This 10-year carryback includes product liability and tort losses and nuclear decommissioning expenses. Sec. 172(f)(1), (3). The 10-year carryback was enacted for product liability losses in 1978. Sec. 172(j); Revenue Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95- 600, sec. 371(b), 92 Stat. 2859. It was extended to specified liability and tort liability losses and costs of decommissioning nuclear power plants (section 172(k)) in 1984. Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 (DEFRA), Pub. L. 98-369, sec. 91(d)(2), 98 Stat. 60

. This 10-year carryback includes product liability and tort losses and nuclear decommissioning expenses. Sec. 172(f)(1), (3). The 10-year carryback was enacted for product liability losses in 1978. Sec. 172(j); Revenue Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95- 600, sec. 371(b), 92 Stat. 2859. It was extended to specified liability and tort liability losses and costs of decommissioning nuclear power plants (section 172(k)) in 1984. Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 (DEFRA), Pub. L. 98-369, sec. 91(d)(2), 98 Stat. 60

Michael J. Fitzpatrick, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1995-548 · 1995

On May 19, 1989, the District Court for the District of Rhode Island entered a judgment of guilty on both counts, following a trial upon the merits. Said judgment was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on December 27, 1989. United States v. Fitzpatrick, 892 F.2d 162 (1st Cir. 1989). The second indictment ch

William C. & Elaine Gaskins, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1995-511 · 1995

section 371 for the taxable year 1980. They were acquitted of the same charges for the years 1979 and 1981. Respondent determined that Mr. Gaskins and Mr. Quinn each had diverted receipts from West Pine in the amounts of $46,891, $52,819, and $154,630 for 1979, 1980, and 1981, respectively, and adjusted the Gaskins' and the Quinns' incomes as repor

Jerry & Patricia A. Dixon, Petitioner 90 T.C. No. 17 · 1988

Section 371 for the years 1976 up to and including the present. - 7 - On January 22, 1981, the search warrant was executed. Seventy-seven boxes and two filing cabinets of records were seized from Kersting's office. Among the documents seized were notes, copies of stock certificates, stock subscription agreements and checks pertaining to petitioner

Dixon v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 237 · 1988

Section 371 for the years 1976 up to and including the present. On January 22, 1981, the search warrant was executed. Seventy-seven boxes and two filing cabinets of records were seized from Kersting’s office. Among the documents seized were notes, copies of stock certificates, stock subscription agreements and checks pertaining to petitioners Dixon

Berkery v. Commissioner 91 T.C. 179 · 1988
United States v. Plezia 115 F.4th 379 · Cir.
United States v. Nicholas Lucidonio · Cir.
United States v. Kearney · Cir.
Baranski v. United States 515 F.3d 857 · Cir.
United States v. Gerhard 615 F.3d 7 · Cir.
United States v. Fayez Damra 621 F.3d 474 · Cir.
United States v. Fayez Damra · Cir.
United States v. Tamika Riley 621 F.3d 312 · Cir.
Lara v. Trominski 216 F.3d 487 · Cir.
Lara-Resendez v. INS · Cir.
United States v. Newell 658 F.3d 1 · Cir.
United States v. Gonzalez 647 F.3d 41 · Cir.
United States v. Gonzalez · Cir.
United States v. Gonzalez · Cir.
United States v. Loe 255 F.3d 228 · Cir.
United States v. Loe's Highport Inc · Cir.
United States v. Loe's Highport Inc · Cir.
United States v. Loe · Cir.
United States v. Green 272 F.3d 748 · Cir.
United States v. Amico · Cir.
United States v. Baucom 486 F.3d 822 · Cir.
United States v. Abboud, Michel · Cir.
United States v. Navarro · Cir.
United States v. Donald S. Fletcher · Cir.
United States v. Robert Scully 882 F.3d 549 · Cir.
United States v. Vahan Kelerchian 937 F.3d 895 · Cir.
United States v. Vahan Kelerchian · Cir.
United States v. Gehrmann 966 F.3d 1074 · Cir.
United States v. Mubayyid 658 F.3d 35 · Cir.
United States v. Bansal 663 F.3d 634 · Cir.
United States v. Louper-Morris 672 F.3d 539 · Cir.
United States v. Whiteford 676 F.3d 348 · Cir.
United States v. Rabhan 540 F.3d 344 · Cir.
United States v. Zvi 25 F. App'x 34 · Cir.
United States v. Rhodis 58 F. App'x 527 · Cir.
Manko v. United States 63 F. App'x 570 · Cir.
United States v. Donald Stuart Fletcher 322 F.3d 508 · Cir.
United States v. Selgas · Cir.
United States v. George Atiyeh United States of America v. George Atiyeh 402 F.3d 354 · Cir.
United States v. Adel Habib Iskander 407 F.3d 232 · Cir.
United States v. Tomo Razmilovic, David E. Nachman, Kenneth Jaeggi, Movant-Appellant 419 F.3d 134 · Cir.
United States v. Elie F. Abboud (04-3942) and Michel Abboud (04-3943) 438 F.3d 554 · Cir.
United States v. Robert J. Amico, Richard N. Amico 486 F.3d 764 · Cir.
United States v. Martin Louis Baucom, United States of America v. Patrick Grant Davis, United States of America v. Martin Louis Baucom, United States of America v. Martin Louis Baucom, United States of America v. Patrick Grant Davis, United States of America v. Martin Louis Baucom 486 F.3d 822 · Cir.
United States v. Neal 679 F.3d 737 · Cir.
United States v. Daugerdas 837 F.3d 212 · Cir.
United States v. Blaszczak 56 F.4th 230 · Cir.
Porter v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 548 · 1987
Smith v. Commissioner 78 T.C. 350 · 1982
Paine v. Commissioner 63 T.C. 736 · 1975
United States v. Rigas 605 F.3d 194 · Cir.
United States v. Gregory Ervasti · Cir.
United States v. Herman 997 F.3d 251 · Cir.
United States v. Gregory Charles Ervasti, United States of America v. Deniene "Dee" Ervasti 201 F.3d 1029 · Cir.
United States v. John Heard, Jr. 709 F.3d 413 · Cir.
United States v. Shellef and Rubenstein · Cir.
United States v. Shellef and Rubenstein 507 F.3d 82 · Cir.
United States v. Scott Flynn 969 F.3d 873 · Cir.
United States v. Maynard 984 F.3d 948 · Cir.
United States v. Greebel 47 F.4th 65 · Cir.
Kroll v. Commissioner 49 T.C. 557 · 1968
United States v. Saybolt 577 F.3d 195 · Cir.
United States v. Delfino 510 F.3d 468 · Cir.
United States v. Abby Rae Cole 721 F.3d 1016 · Cir.
United States v. Pullman 139 F.4th 35 · Cir.
United States v. Bogart 576 F.3d 565 · Cir.
United States v. Beale 574 F.3d 512 · Cir.
United States v. Mazza-Alaluf 621 F.3d 205 · Cir.
United States v. McElroy 587 F.3d 73 · Cir.
United States v. Ganim 510 F.3d 134 · Cir.
United States v. Heinz · Cir.
United States v. Jones · Cir.
United States v. Rayborn · Cir.
United States v. Bogart · Cir.
United States v. Tully, William · Cir.
United States v. Terlingo 327 F.3d 216 · Cir.
United States v. Jeffrey Chmielewski · Cir.
Keith Baranski v. United States · Cir.
United States v. Ramona Johnson 841 F.3d 299 · Cir.
United States v. Steve Hale 857 F.3d 158 · Cir.
United States v. Roy Bradley, Sr. 917 F.3d 493 · Cir.
United States v. Atilla 966 F.3d 118 · Cir.
United States v. Gas Pipe 997 F.3d 231 · Cir.
United States v. Nardozzi 2 F.4th 2 · Cir.
United States v. McKenzie-Gude 671 F.3d 452 · Cir.
United States v. Knight · Cir.
United States v. Sabino 274 F.3d 1053 · Cir.
Zack v. United States 9 F. App'x 394 · Cir.
Harrison v. Lamanna 10 F. App'x 309 · Cir.
United States v. Meneilly 28 F. App'x 26 · Cir.
United States v. Bernstein 43 F. App'x 429 · Cir.
United States v. Rhodis 58 F. App'x 855 · Cir.
United States v. Ingram 62 F. App'x 32 · Cir.
Reynolds v. United States 64 F. App'x 508 · Cir.
United States v. Jeffrey S. Chmielewski 218 F.3d 840 · Cir.
United States v. Roscoe R. Beaty 245 F.3d 617 · Cir.
United States v. Joe Sabino 274 F.3d 1053 · Cir.
United States v. William E. Tully, Appeal of Travis v. Pherson 288 F.3d 982 · Cir.
United States v. Lawrence Laspina, Robert St. Germain 299 F.3d 165 · Cir.
United States v. Terlingo 327 F.3d 216 · Cir.
United States v. Clifton Lamount Williams 364 F.3d 556 · Cir.
United States v. Amy Tucker 376 F.3d 236 · Cir.
United States v. Charles E. Jones, Iii, A/K/A Chuckie 471 F.3d 535 · Cir.
United States v. Gerald Rayborn 491 F.3d 513 · Cir.
United States v. DeMURO 677 F.3d 550 · Cir.
United States v. Harriet Jinwright 683 F.3d 471 · Cir.
United States v. Heinz 790 F.3d 365 · Cir.
United States v. Creamer 70 F. App'x 48 · Cir.
Bradley v. United States 84 F. App'x 492 · Cir.
United States v. Wade 108 F. App'x 336 · Cir.
United States v. Baldon 457 F. App'x 393 · Cir.
United States v. Poltonowicz 353 F. App'x 690 · Cir.
United States v. Poltonowicz 353 F. App'x 690 · Cir.
United States v. Lowell Baisden 713 F.3d 450 · Cir.
United States v. Parker 572 F. App'x 13 · Cir.
United States v. Harrison 663 F. App'x 460 · Cir.
Brodsky v. Carter 673 F. App'x 42 · Cir.
United States v. Shellef · Cir.
Joseph B. Williams, III, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2009-81 · 2009
Bussell v. Commissioner 130 T.C. 222 · 2008
Edelman v. Commissioner 103 T.C. 705 · 1994
Ianniello v. Commissioner 98 T.C. 165 · 1992
Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner 98 T.C. 518 · 1992
O'Malley v. Commissioner 96 T.C. 644 · 1991
DiLeo v. Commissioner 96 T.C. 858 · 1991
Stephens v. Commissioner 93 T.C. 108 · 1989
Brizell v. Commissioner 93 T.C. 151 · 1989
O'Malley v. Commissioner 91 T.C. 352 · 1988
Hulter v. Commissioner 91 T.C. 371 · 1988
Smith v. Commissioner 91 T.C. 733 · 1988
Matut v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 1250 · 1987
Johnson v. Commissioner 72 T.C. 340 · 1979
Gordon v. Commissioner 63 T.C. 51 · 1974
Mazzei v. Commissioner 61 T.C. 497 · 1974
Estate of Beck v. Commissioner 56 T.C. 297 · 1971
Borg v. Commissioner 50 T.C. 257 · 1968
Simpson v. Commissioner 43 T.C. 900 · 1965
Drybrough v. Commissioner 42 T.C. 1029 · 1964
WAGE, Inc. v. Commissioner 19 T.C. 249 · 1952
Estate of Paul v. Commissioner 16 T.C. 743 · 1951
United States v. Dequattro 118 F.4th 424 · Cir.
United States v. Harris 498 F.3d 278 · Cir.
United States v. Borino · Cir.
Virginia Duncan v. Rob Bonta · Cir.
United States v. Marion Michael O'Steen 133 F.4th 1200 · Cir.
United States v. Marion Michael O'Steen · Cir.
United States v. Thomas Greco, Jr. 734 F.3d 441 · Cir.
United States v. Ray 139 F.4th 126 · Cir.
United States v. Wynder, Jr. · Cir.
United States v. Mark Gyetvay · Cir.
United States v. Ronald DiPietro · Cir.
United States v. Christopher Arthur · Cir.
United States v. Powell 576 F.3d 482 · Cir.
United States v. Lalonde 509 F.3d 750 · Cir.
United States v. Josephberg 562 F.3d 478 · Cir.
Lueth v. Beach 498 F.3d 795 · Cir.
United States v. McKee 506 F.3d 225 · Cir.
United States v. Yusuf 536 F.3d 178 · Cir.
United States v. Aranjo 603 F.3d 112 · Cir.
United States v. Castello 611 F.3d 116 · Cir.
United States v. De La Paz-Rentas 613 F.3d 18 · Cir.
Sotirion v. United States 617 F.3d 27 · Cir.
United States v. Richard Stadtmauer 620 F.3d 238 · Cir.
United States v. Richard Stadtmauer · Cir.
United States v. Roy Schmidt, III 623 F.3d 257 · Cir.
United States v. Drachenberg 623 F.3d 122 · Cir.
United States v. Roy Schmidt, III · Cir.
United States v. Bohuchot 625 F.3d 892 · Cir.
United States v. Thorson 633 F.3d 312 · Cir.
United States v. Boulerice 325 F.3d 75 · Cir.
United States v. Mikutowicz 365 F.3d 65 · Cir.
United States v. Chase · Cir.
United States v. Milkiewicz 470 F.3d 390 · Cir.
United States v. Pesaturo 476 F.3d 60 · Cir.
United States v. Schussel 291 F. App'x 336 · Cir.
United States v. Poole 640 F.3d 114 · Cir.
United States v. Witham 648 F.3d 40 · Cir.
United States v. Maxwell 643 F.3d 1096 · Cir.
United States v. Jimenez · Cir.
United States v. Loe 262 F.3d 427 · Cir.
United States v. Ronald Ottaviano 738 F.3d 586 · Cir.
United States v. Floyd 740 F.3d 22 · Cir.
United States v. Adams 740 F.3d 40 · Cir.
United States v. Luciano Pascacio-Rodriguez 749 F.3d 353 · Cir.
United States v. Charles Barefoot, Jr. 754 F.3d 226 · Cir.
Clearing House Ass'n v. Cuomo · Cir.
United States v. Bolden · Cir.
United States v. Anderson 353 F.3d 490 · Cir.
United States v. Stone · Cir.
United States v. Kosinski · Cir.
United States v. Lalonde · Cir.
United States v. Dedman · Cir.
United States v. Scialabba, Lawrence · Cir.
United States v. Chavin, Leonard · Cir.
United States v. Willie Harris · Cir.
United States v. Lloyd · Cir.
United States v. John Bad Wound · Cir.
United States v. Jim Guy Tucker · Cir.
United States v. McKee · Cir.
United States v. Myron C. Piggie · Cir.
United States v. Duane Huber 404 F.3d 1047 · Cir.
United States v. Yusuf 49 V.I. 1182 · Cir.
United States v. Douglas G. Radtke · Cir.
United States v. Jim Guy Tucker · Cir.
United States v. William D. Pierce · Cir.
Amel Lueth v. Charles Beach · Cir.
United States v. Robert B. Beale · Cir.
United States v. Griffin · Cir.
United States v. Joseph Mudekunye · Cir.
United States v. Gladstone Morrison 833 F.3d 491 · Cir.
United States v. Adekunle Adeolu 836 F.3d 330 · Cir.
United States v. Daugerdas · Cir.
United States v. Marinello 855 F.3d 455 · Cir.
United States v. Abraham Fisch 851 F.3d 402 · Cir.
Island Fork Construction v. Jimmy Bowling 872 F.3d 754 · Cir.
United States v. Stegman 873 F.3d 1215 · Cir.
United States v. Mark Henry 888 F.3d 589 · Cir.
United States v. Cox 906 F.3d 1170 · Cir.
United States v. Flete-Garcia 925 F.3d 17 · Cir.
United States v. Hassan Osman 929 F.3d 962 · Cir.
United States v. Asmerom Keleta · Cir.
United States v. Asmerom Keleta 949 F.3d 1082 · Cir.
United States v. Carl Nicholson 961 F.3d 328 · Cir.
James Dimora v. United States 973 F.3d 496 · Cir.
United States v. Razzouk 984 F.3d 181 · Cir.
United States v. Mubarak Hamed 976 F.3d 825 · Cir.
United States v. Scott 979 F.3d 986 · Cir.
United States v. Razzouk · Cir.
United States v. Kenneth Smukler 986 F.3d 229 · Cir.
United States v. Kenneth Smukler 991 F.3d 472 · Cir.
United States v. David Shulick 994 F.3d 123 · Cir.
United States v. Brocato 4 F.4th 296 · Cir.
United States v. David Shulick · Cir.
United States v. David Shulick · Cir.
United States v. Clayton · Cir.
United States v. Rao Desu · Cir.
United States v. Sabhnani 599 F.3d 215 · Cir.
United States v. Ellefsen 655 F.3d 769 · Cir.
United States v. Hildenbrand 527 F.3d 466 · Cir.
United States v. Keller 666 F.3d 103 · Cir.
United States v. Rozin 664 F.3d 1052 · Cir.
United States v. Allen 670 F.3d 12 · Cir.
United States v. Moyer 674 F.3d 192 · Cir.
United States v. Teresa Barringer 25 F.4th 239 · Cir.
United States v. Williams · Cir.
United States v. Garza 593 F.3d 385 · Cir.
United States v. Scarpa 4 F. App'x 115 · Cir.
United States v. Davis 603 F.3d 303 · Cir.
United States v. Bradley 26 F. App'x 392 · Cir.
United States v. Erlikh 38 F. App'x 723 · Cir.
United States v. Karamanos 38 F. App'x 727 · Cir.
United States v. Fridley 43 F. App'x 830 · Cir.
United States v. Pedroni 45 F. App'x 103 · Cir.
United States v. Enright 46 F. App'x 66 · Cir.
United States v. Konicov 49 F. App'x 607 · Cir.
United States v. Rodriguez 54 F. App'x 739 · Cir.
United States v. Gloria Stevens and Thomas M. McLaughlin Joseph Gall 211 F.3d 1 · Cir.
United States v. Jim Guy Tucker 217 F.3d 960 · Cir.
In Re GRAND JURY SUBPOENA 223 F.3d 213 · Cir.
United States v. Peter Simonelli 237 F.3d 19 · Cir.
United States v. Edward Jimenez, Also Known as Big Eddie Paul Santivanez 256 F.3d 330 · Cir.
United States v. Amos Searan and Jeanettia Searan 259 F.3d 434 · Cir.
United States v. Lawrence Orlando, Sr. (00-6312) and Tera M. Daniels (00-6409) 281 F.3d 586 · Cir.
United States v. Lawrence Scialabba and Robert T. Cechini 282 F.3d 475 · Cir.
United States v. Jerry C. Crouch 288 F.3d 907 · Cir.
United States v. Steven B. Zats 298 F.3d 182 · Cir.
United States v. Michael John Modena 302 F.3d 626 · Cir.
United States v. Myron C. Piggie 303 F.3d 923 · Cir.
United States v. John A. Gambone, Sr. A/K/A Jack John A. Gambone, Sr., United States of America v. Anthony Gambone A/K/A Tony Anthony Gambone 314 F.3d 163 · Cir.
United States v. Leonard Chavin and Martin Litwin 316 F.3d 666 · Cir.
United States v. Florita Bell Griffin, Terrence Bernard Roberts, Joe Lee Walker 324 F.3d 330 · Cir.
United States v. Glennis L. Bolden, United States of America v. Clifford E. Bolden 325 F.3d 471 · Cir.
United States v. Frederick Schultz 333 F.3d 393 · Cir.
United States v. Anderson 353 F.3d 490 · Cir.
United States v. Benjamin J. Lloyd 361 F.3d 197 · Cir.
United States v. Duane Huber, United States of America v. Huber Farms, Inc., United States of America v. Huber Farms General Partnership, United States of America v. Duane Huber Huber Farms, Inc. Huber Farmers General Partnership 404 F.3d 1047 · Cir.
United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Leo v. Felton Erica Chase, Appellants/cross-Appellees 417 F.3d 97 · Cir.
United States v. Jim Guy Tucker 419 F.3d 719 · Cir.
United States v. Charles C. Stone (04-6184) Dora B. Stone (04-6185) 432 F.3d 651 · Cir.
United States v. James H. Giffen 473 F.3d 30 · Cir.
United States v. William D. Pierce, United States of America v. Shirley Best Pierce 479 F.3d 546 · Cir.
United States v. Norman Stoerr 695 F.3d 271 · Cir.
United States v. Michael Vallone 698 F.3d 416 · Cir.
United States v. Colasuonno 697 F.3d 164 · Cir.
United States v. Ted Murray 700 F.3d 241 · Cir.
United States v. Ted Murray · Cir.
United States v. Coplan 703 F.3d 46 · Cir.
United States v. Deleon 704 F.3d 189 · Cir.
United States v. Benson 79 F. App'x 813 · Cir.
United States v. Wade 93 F. App'x 874 · Cir.
United States v. Salvagno 343 F. App'x 702 · Cir.
United States v. Salvagno 343 F. App'x 702 · Cir.
United States v. Zhen Zhou Wu 711 F.3d 1 · Cir.
United States v. Bulluck 182 F. App'x 7 · Cir.
United States v. Ganim 256 F. App'x 399 · Cir.
United States v. Mark Ciavarella, Jr. 716 F.3d 705 · Cir.
Chhabra v. United States 720 F.3d 395 · Cir.
United States v. Albert Upshur 67 F.4th 178 · Cir.
United States v. Abdelaziz 68 F.4th 1 · Cir.
Vamusa Kosh Ishmael v. Attorney General United States · Cir.
Vamusa Kosh Ishmael v. Attorney General United States · Cir.
Vamusa Kosh Ishmael v. Attorney General United States 77 F.4th 175 · Cir.
Vamusa Kosh Ishmael v. Attorney General United States · Cir.
United States v. Kenneth Johnson · Cir.
United States v. Jeffrey Wirth 719 F.3d 911 · Cir.