§3729

27 cases·3 followed·1 distinguished·3 questioned·5 overruled·15 cited11% support

Statute text not available for this section.

27 Citing Cases

3729 (2012), in the U.S. District Court for the District ofUtah. Petitioners timely filed their 2010 and 2011 Forms 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return. In 2012 petitioners filed a Form 1040X, Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for 2010. Petitioners attached Forms 2106-EZ, Unreimbursed Employee Business Expenses, to the 2010 Form 1

The FCA authorizes a person, referred to as the relator, to file under seal a complaint seeking reimbursement on the Government's behalf. E sec. 3The taxpayer generally bears the burden ofproving the Commissioner's determinations are erroneous. Rule 142(a). The burden ofproofmay shift to the Commissioner ifthe taxpayer satisfie

Patrick v. Commissioner 142 T.C. 124 · 2014

The FCA authorizes a person, referred to as the relator, to file under seal a complaint seeking reimbursement on the Government’s behalf. Id. sec. 3730(b)(1). The relator must serve on the Government the complaint and all supporting information the relator possesses before the action may proceed. Id. sec. 3730(b)(2). The Govern

Campbell v. Commissioner 134 T.C. 20 · 2010

The relator may bring the claim on his own; however, the Government has the right to intervene in the case. 31 U.S.C. sec. 3730. The relator receives a share of the proceeds ranging from 15 to 25 percent if the Government intervenes, and 25 to 30 percent if the Government declines to intervene. 31 U.S.C. sec. 3730(d)(1) and (2). The r

Sara J. Burns, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2007-271 · 2007

3729 (2000), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California (the whistle-blower case). The whistle-blower case was settled pursuant to an agreement between the United States and FPASD in which FPASD agreed to pay $2 million to the United States in four annual installments, beginning in 1996. Under the statutory scheme, peti

United States Ex Rel. Billington v. HCL Techs. Ltd. 126 F.4th 799 · Cir.
United States v. McBride · Cir.
United States v. Medshares Mgmt Grp · Cir.
United States of America Ex Rel. Michael Lissack v. Sakura Global Capital Markets, Inc. And Mitsui Taiyo Kobe Global Capital, Inc. 377 F.3d 145 · Cir.
United States of America, Ex Rel. A+ Homecare, Inc. v. Medshares Management Group, Inc. Trevecca Home Health Services, Inc., Stephen H. Winters 400 F.3d 428 · Cir.
United States v. James Wegeler 941 F.3d 665 · Cir.
Eastman v. Marine Mechanical · Cir.
John T. Eastman v. Marine Mechanical Corporation 438 F.3d 544 · Cir.
United States ex rel. Shannon Martin, M.D. v. Darren Hathaway 63 F.4th 1043 · Cir.
United States v. Saybolt 577 F.3d 195 · Cir.
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. v. United States 763 F.3d 64 · Cir.
United States v. James Thomas McBride 362 F.3d 360 · Cir.
Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner 98 T.C. 518 · 1992
Island Industries, Inc. v. Sigma Corporation 142 F.4th 1153 · Cir.
Island Industries, Inc. v. Sigma Corporation · Cir.
Bailey v. Shell Western E&P, Inc. 609 F.3d 710 · Cir.
United States Ex Rel. Oberg v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency 745 F.3d 131 · Cir.
United States v. Luciano Pascacio-Rodriguez 749 F.3d 353 · Cir.
Patrick v. Commissioner 799 F.3d 885 · Cir.
Brooks v. United States · Cir.
J. Hilton Brooks, Iii, M.D. v. United States 383 F.3d 521 · Cir.
Astellas US Holding, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company 66 F.4th 1055 · Cir.