§407 — Certain employees of domestic subsidiaries engaged in business outside the United States

32 cases·2 followed·1 distinguished·4 criticized·25 cited6% support

(a)Treatment as employees of domestic parent corporation
(1)In general

For purposes of applying this part with respect to a pension, profit-sharing, or stock bonus plan described in section 401(a) or an annuity plan described in section 403(a), of a domestic parent corporation, an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States and who is an employee of a domestic subsidiary (within the meaning of paragraph (2)) of such domestic parent corporation shall be treated as an employee of such domestic parent corporation, if—

(A)

the plan of such domestic parent corporation expressly provides for contributions or benefits for individuals who are citizens or residents of the United States and who are employees of its domestic subsidiaries; and

(B)

contributions under a funded plan of deferred compensation (whether or not a plan described in section 401(a) or 403(a)) are not provided by any other person with respect to the remuneration paid to such individual by the domestic subsidiary.

(2)Definitions

For purposes of this section—

(A)Domestic subsidiary

A corporation shall be treated as a domestic subsidiary for any taxable year only if—

(i)

such corporation is a domestic corporation 80 percent or more of the outstanding voting stock of which is owned by another domestic corporation;

(ii)

95 percent or more of its gross income for the three-year period immediately preceding the close of its taxable year which ends on or before the close of the taxable year of such other domestic corporation (or for such part of such period during which the corporation was in existence), was derived from sources without the United States; and

(iii)

90 percent or more of its gross income for such period (or such part) was derived from the active conduct of a trade or business.

If for the period (or part thereof) referred to in clauses (ii) and (iii) such corporation has no gross income, the provisions of clauses (ii) and (iii) shall be treated as satisfied if it is reasonable to anticipate that, with respect to the first taxable year thereafter for which such corporation has gross income, the provisions of such clauses will be satisfied.

(B)Domestic parent corporation

The domestic parent corporation of any domestic subsidiary is the domestic corporation which owns 80 percent or more of the outstanding voting stock of such domestic subsidiary.

(b)Special rules for application of section 401(a)
(1)Nondiscrimination requirements

For purposes of applying section 401(a)(4) and section 410(b) with respect to an individual who is treated as an employee of a domestic parent corporation under subsection (a)—

(A)

if such individual is a highly compensated employee (within the meaning of section 414(q)), he shall be treated as having such capacity with respect to such domestic parent corporation; and

(B)

the determination of whether such individual is a highly compensated employee (as so defined) shall be made by treating such individual’s total compensation (determined with the application of paragraph (2) of this subsection) as compensation paid by such domestic parent corporation and by determining such individual’s status with regard to such domestic parent corporation.

(2)Determination of compensation

For purposes of applying paragraph (5) of section 401(a) with respect to an individual who is treated as an employee of a domestic parent corporation under subsection (a), the total compensation of such individual shall be the remuneration paid to such individual by the domestic subsidiary which would constitute his total compensation if his services had been performed for such domestic parent corporation, and the basic or regular rate of compensation of such individual shall be determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

(c)Repealed. Pub. L. 104–188, title I, § 1401(b)(8), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1789]
(d)Deductibility of contributions

For purposes of applying section 404 with respect to contributions made to or under a pension, profit-sharing, stock bonus, or annuity plan by a domestic parent corporation, or by another corporation which is entitled to deduct its contributions under section 404(a)(3)(B), on behalf of an individual who is treated as an employee of such domestic corporation under subsection (a)—

(1)

except as provided in paragraph (2), no deduction shall be allowed to such domestic parent corporation or to any other corporation which is entitled to deduct its contributions under such sections,

(2)

there shall be allowed as a deduction to the domestic subsidiary of which such individual is an employee an amount equal to the amount which (but for paragraph (1)) would be deductible under section 404 by the domestic parent corporation if he were an employee of the domestic parent corporation, and

(3)

any reference to compensation shall be considered to be a reference to the total compensation of such individual (determined with the application of subsection (b)(2)).

Any amount deductible by a domestic subsidiary under this subsection shall be deductible for its taxable year with or within which the taxable year of such domestic parent corporation ends.

(e)Treatment as employee under related provisions

An individual who is treated as an employee of a domestic parent corporation under subsection (a) shall also be treated as an employee of such domestic parent corporation, with respect to the plan described in subsection (a)(1)(A), for purposes of applying the following provisions of this title:

(1)

Section 72(f) (relating to special rules for computing employees’ contributions).

(2)

Section 2039 (relating to annuities).

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.407-1 Treatment of certain employees of domestic subsidiaries engaged in business outside the United States as employees of the domestic parent corporation
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.407-1(a) Scope—(1) General rule.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.407-1(b) Application of this section—(1) Requirements.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.407-1(c) Special rules—(1) Nondiscrimination requirements.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.407-1(d) Termination of status as deemed employee not to be treated as separation from service for purposes of captial gain provisions and limitation of tax.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.407-1(e) Deductibility of contributions—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.407-1(f) Treatment as an employee of the domestic parent corporation under related provisions.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.407-1(g) Nonexempt trust.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.407-1(i) §1.407-1(i)

32 Citing Cases

CRIT. George M. & Grace E. Collins, Petitioner 110 T.C. No. 16 · 1998

* * * We disagree with petitioners' interpretation of section 6224(c)(2).

Thomas L. & Betty R. Saliba, Petitioner 110 T.C. No. 16 · 1998

Section 407 of TEFRA, 96 Stat. 610-671, expressly and specifically provides that its provisions, including the - 9 - settlement procedures of section 6224, apply only to partnership taxable years beginning after September 3, 1982, with an exception not here relevant. Section 407(a)(1) of TEFRA, 96 Stat. 670, provides as follows: Except as provided

James & Lynne M. Lotta, Petitioner 110 T.C. No. 16 · 1998

Section 407 of TEFRA, 96 Stat. 610-671, expressly and specifically provides that its provisions, including the - 9 - settlement procedures of section 6224, apply only to partnership taxable years beginning after September 3, 1982, with an exception not here relevant. Section 407(a)(1) of TEFRA, 96 Stat. 670, provides as follows: Except as provided

Joseph E. Simanonok, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-66 · 2002

407 (1994) may provide that a taxpayer’s Social Security benefits are not subject to levy or other legal process, but see sec. 6334(c), has nothing to do with the taxability of those benefits. In view of the foregoing, we hold that petitioner’s Social Security benefits are includable in petitioner’s gross income as - 13 - determined by respon

Scott Grunsted, Petitioner 136 T.C. No. 21 · 2011

2960. -5- returns or financial information so that collection alternatives could be considered. Petitioner did, -however, send a long letter arguing that respondent had failed to -follow assessment procedures because the Secretary had not appointed a district director in his geographical area. Petitioner concluded that, because

2960, in conjunction with the amendment of section 6702 to increase the penalty for filing frivolous returns from $500 to $5,000 and to - 16 - impose a new $5,000 penalty on specified frivolous submissions. The legislative history, S. Rept. 109-336, at 49-50 (2006), explains: PRESENT LAWe The Code provides that an individual wh

Timothy L. Clouse, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2007-118 · 2007

2960, which, through amendments to secs. 6702 and 6330, instructs the Secretary to prescribe a list of positions identified as frivolous. A request for a sec. 6330 hearing based on any such position may then be disregarded and is not subject to further administrative or judicial review. The new provisions are effective only for

Dean & Rosalie Monahan, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-52 · 2002

670. Among other arguments, petitioners argue that Barrister’s 1982 taxable year began before September 3, 1982, that the TEFRA partnerships procedures and the above cases are not applicable, and that petitioners individually, in the instant case, should be allowed to assert the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense. I

Robert W. & Patricia A. Ackerman, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-315 · 1996

670-671 All of the settlement agreements signed by petitioners contain a statement that they are entered into under the provisions of section 6224(c).5 Under section 6224(c)(1), a settlement agreement is binding on the parties to the agreement 5Sec. 6224(c) is part of the Tax Treatment of Partnership Items Act of 1982 in TEFRA, P

Hoptowit v. Commissioner 78 T.C. 137 · 1982
Lambos v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 1440 · 1987
Deyo v. United States 296 F. App'x 157 · Cir.
Catherine N. Alexander, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-75 · 2012
Stahl v. Commissioner 96 T.C. 798 · 1991
Barbados #6 Ltd. v. Commissioner 85 T.C. 900 · 1985
Smith v. Commissioner 59 T.C. 107 · 1972
LeVine v. Commissioner 24 T.C. 147 · 1955
Spreckels v. Commissioner 13 T.C. 1079 · 1949
Phillips v. Commissioner 8 T.C. 1286 · 1947
Estate of Milburn v. Commissioner 6 T.C. 1119 · 1946
Estate of Rice v. Commissioner 7 T.C. 223 · 1946
Estate of Miller v. Commissioner 3 T.C. 1180 · 1944
Consumers' Research v. FCC 109 F.4th 743 · Cir.
Lantz v. Commissioner 607 F.3d 479 · Cir.
United States v. Hyde 497 F.3d 103 · Cir.
Cathy M. Lantz v. CIR · Cir.
United States v. Hercules, Inc. 247 F.3d 706 · Cir.
United States v. Stefan Irving 452 F.3d 110 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.