§4281 — Small aircraft on nonestablished lines

10 cases·10 cited

(a)In general

The taxes imposed by sections 4261 and 4271 shall not apply to transportation by an aircraft having a maximum certificated takeoff weight of 6,000 pounds or less, except when such aircraft is operated on an established line or when such aircraft is a jet aircraft.

(b)Maximum certificated takeoff weight

For purposes of this section, the term “maximum certificated takeoff weight” means the maximum such weight contained in the type certificate or airworthiness certificate.

(c)Sightseeing

For purposes of this section, an aircraft shall not be considered as operated on an established line at any time during which such aircraft is being operated on a flight the sole purpose of which is sightseeing.

(d)Jet aircraft

For purposes of this section, the term “jet aircraft” shall not include any aircraft which is a rotorcraft or propeller aircraft.

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §49.4281-1 Small aircraft on nonestablished lines
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §49.4281-1(a) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §49.4281-1(b) Maximum certificated takeoff weight.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §49.4281-1(c) Established line.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §49.4281-1(d) Jet aircraft.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §49.4281-1(e) Applicability date.

10 Citing Cases

(B) Treatment ofcertain plan amendments.--For purposes ofsubparagraph (A), a plan amendment which has the effect of-- (i) eliminating or reducing an early retirement benefit or a retirement-type subsidy (as defined in regulations), or (continued...) - 11 - [*11] Petitioners request in their petition that we enter a declaratoryjudgment that the Plan "is not a qualified plan by virtue ofthe adoption ofAmendment #2 on May 27, 2008, notwithstanding the determination ofthe Commissioner to the contra

Charles P. Stepnowski, Petitioner 124 T.C. No. 12 · 2005

(B) Treatment of certain plan amendments.-- For purposes of subparagraph (A), a plan amendment which has the effect of-- (i) eliminating or reducing an early retirement benefit or a retirement-type subsidy (as defined in regulations), or (ii) eliminating an optional form of benefit, with respect to benefits attributable to service before the amendment shall be treated as reducing accrued benefits.

(B) Treatment of certain plan amendments.--For purposes of subparagraph (A), a plan amendment which has the effect of-- (i) eliminating or reducing an early retirement benefit or a retirement-type subsidy (as defined in regulations)[3], or 3 There is no definition of "retirement-type subsidy" in the regulations.

Thornton v. Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Supplemental Retirement & Disability Fund 566 F.3d 597 · Cir.
Charles Thornton v. Graphic Commmunications Conference · Cir.
Romero v. Allstate Corp. 404 F.3d 212 · Cir.
Sofco Erectors, Inc. v. Trustees of the Ohio Operating Eng'rs Pension Fund 15 F.4th 407 · Cir.
Perreca v. Gluck 295 F.3d 215 · Cir.
Perreca v. Gluck 295 F.3d 215 · Cir.
Gene Romero v. The Allstate Corporation 404 F.3d 212 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.