§446 — General rule for methods of accounting
307 citing cases
Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §446
Taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books.
If no method of accounting has been regularly used by the taxpayer, or if the method used does not clearly reflect income, the computation of taxable income shall be made under such method as, in the opinion of the Secretary, does clearly reflect income.
Subject to the provisions of subsections (a) and (b), a taxpayer may compute taxable income under any of the following methods of accounting—
the cash receipts and disbursements method;
an accrual method;
any other method permitted by this chapter; or
any combination of the foregoing methods permitted under regulations prescribed by the Secretary.
A taxpayer engaged in more than one trade or business may, in computing taxable income, use a different method of accounting for each trade or business.
Except as otherwise expressly provided in this chapter, a taxpayer who changes the method of accounting on the basis of which he regularly computes his income in keeping his books shall, before computing his taxable income under the new method, secure the consent of the Secretary.
If the taxpayer does not file with the Secretary a request to change the method of accounting, the absence of the consent of the Secretary to a change in the method of accounting shall not be taken into account—
to prevent the imposition of any penalty, or the addition of any amount to tax, under this title, or
to diminish the amount of such penalty or addition to tax.
Treasury Regulations
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-1General rule for methods of accounting
(a) General rule. (1) Section 446(a) provides that taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which a taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books. The term “method of accounting” includes not only the overall method of accounting of the taxpayer but also the accounting treatment of any item. Examples of such over-all methods are the cash receipts and disbursements method, an accrual method, combinations of such methods, and combinations of the foregoing with various methods provided for the accounting treatment of special items. These methods of accounting for special items include the accounting treatment prescribed for research and experimental expenditures, soil and water conservation expenditures, depreciation, net operating losses, etc. Except for deviations permitted or required by such special accounting treatment, taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books. For requirement respecting the adoption or change of accounting method, see section 446(e) and paragraph (e) of this section.
(2) It is recognized that no uniform method of accounting can be prescribed for all taxpayers. Each taxpayer shall adopt such forms and systems as are, in his judgment, best suited to his needs. However, no method of accounting is acceptable unless, in the opinion of the Commissioner, it clearly reflects income. A method of accounting which reflects the consistent application of generally accepted accounting principles in a particular trade or business in accordance with accepted conditions or practices in that trade or business will ordinarily be regarded as clearly reflecting income, provided all items of gross income and expense are treated consistently from year to year.
(3) Items of gross income and expenditures which are elements in the computation of taxable income need not be in the form of cash. It is sufficient that such items can be valued in terms of money. For general rules relating to the taxable year for inclusion of income and for taking deductions, see sections 451 and 461, and the regulations thereunder.
(4) Each taxpayer is required to make a return of his taxable income for each taxable year and must maintain such accounting records as will enable him to file a correct return. See section 6001 and the regulations thereunder.
Accounting records include the taxpayer's regular books of account and such other records and data as may be necessary to support the entries on his books of account and on his return, as for example, a reconciliation of any differences between such books and his return. The following are among the essential features that must be considered in maintaining such records:
(i) Except in the case of a taxpayer qualifying as a small business taxpayer for the taxable year under section 471(c), in all cases in which the production, purchase or sale of merchandise of any kind is an income-producing factor, merchandise on hand (including finished goods, work in progress, raw materials, and supplies) at the beginning and end of the year shall be taken into account in computing the taxable income of the year. (For rules relating to computation of inventories, see section 263A, 471, and 472 and the regulations thereunder.)
(ii) Expenditures made during the year shall be properly classified as between capital and expense. For example, expenditures for such items as plant and equipment, which have a useful life extending substantially beyond the taxable year, shall be charged to a capital account and not to an expense account.
(iii) In any case in which there is allowable with respect to an asset a deduction for depreciation, amortization, or depletion, any expenditures (other than ordinary repairs) made to restore the asset or prolong its useful life shall be added to the asset account or charged against the appropriate reserve.
(b) Exceptions. (1) If the taxpayer does not regularly employ a method of accounting which clearly reflects his income, the computation of taxable income shall be made in a manner which, in the opinion of the Commissioner, does clearly reflect income.
(2) A taxpayer whose sole source of income is wages need not keep formal books in order to have an accounting method. Tax returns, copies thereof, or other records may be sufficient to establish the use of the method of accounting used in the preparation of the taxpayer's income tax returns.
(c) Permissible methods—(1) In general. Subject to the provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, a taxpayer may compute his taxable income under any of the following methods of accounting:
(i) Cash receipts and disbursements method. Generally, under the cash receipts and disbursements method in the computation of taxable income, all items which constitute gross income (whether in the form of cash, property, or services) are to be included for the taxable year in which actually or constructively received. Expenditures are to be deducted for the taxable year in which actually made. For rules relating to constructive receipt, see § 1.451-2. For treatment of an expenditure attributable to more than one taxable year, see section 461(a) and paragraph (a)(1) of § 1.461-1.
(ii) Accrual method. (A) Generally, under an accrual method, income is to be included for the taxable year when all the events have occurred that fix the right to receive the income and the amount of the income can be determined with reasonable accuracy. (See § 1.451-1 for rules relating to the taxable year of inclusion.) Under such a method, a liability is incurred, and generally is taken into account for Federal income tax purposes, in the taxable year in which all the events have occurred that establish the fact of the liability, the amount of the liability can be determined with reasonable accuracy, and economic performance has occurred with respect to the liability. (See paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(A) of § 1.461-1 for examples of liabilities that may not be taken into account until after the taxable year incurred, and see §§ 1.461-4 through 1.461-6 for rules relating to economic performance.) Applicable provisions of the Code, the Income Tax Regulations, and other guidance published by the Secretary prescribe the manner in which a liability that has been incurred is taken into account. For example, section 162 provides that a deductible liability generally is taken into account in the taxable year incurred through a deduction from gross income. As a further example, under section 263 or 263A, a liability that relates to the creation of an asset having a useful life extending substantially beyond the close of the taxable year is taken into account in the taxable year incurred through capitalization (within the meaning of § 1.263A-1(c)(3)) and may later affect the computation of taxable income through depreciation or otherwise over a period including subsequent taxable years, in accordance with applicable Internal Revenue Code sections and related guidance.
(B) The term “liability” includes any item allowable as a deduction, cost, or expense for Federal income tax purposes. In addition to allowable deductions, the term includes any amount otherwise allowable as a capitalized cost, as a cost taken into account in computing cost of goods sold, as a cost allocable to a long-term contract, or as any other cost or expense. Thus, for example, an amount that a taxpayer expends or will expend for capital improvements to property must be incurred before the taxpayer may take the amount into account in computing its basis in the property. The term “liability” is not limited to items for which a legal obligation to pay exists at the time of payment. Thus, for example, amounts prepaid for goods or services and amounts paid without a legal obligation to do so may not be taken into account by an accrual basis taxpayer any earlier than the taxable year in which those amounts are incurred.
(C) No method of accounting is acceptable unless, in the opinion of the Commissioner, it clearly reflects income. The method used by the taxpayer in determining when income is to be accounted for will generally be acceptable if it accords with generally accepted accounting principles, is consistently used by the taxpayer from year to year, and is consistent with the Income Tax Regulations. For example, a taxpayer engaged in a manufacturing business may account for sales of the taxpayer's product when the goods are shipped, when the product is delivered or accepted, or when title to the goods passes to the customers, whether or not billed, depending on the method regularly employed in keeping the taxpayer's books.
(iii) Other permissible methods. Special methods of accounting are described elsewhere in chapter 1 of the Code and the regulations thereunder. For example, see the following sections and the regulations thereunder: Sections 61 and 162, relating to the crop method of accounting; section 453, relating to the installment method; section 460, relating to the long-term contract methods. In addition, special methods of accounting for particular items of income and expense are provided under other sections of chapter 1. For example, see section 174, relating to research and experimental expenditures, and section 175, relating to soil and water conservation expenditures.
(iv) Combinations of the foregoing methods. (a) In accordance with the following rules, any combination of the foregoing methods of accounting will be permitted in connection with a trade or business if such combination clearly reflects income and is consistently used. Where a combination of methods of accounting includes any special methods, such as those referred to in subdivision (iii) of this subparagraph, the taxpayer must comply with the requirements relating to such special methods. A taxpayer using an accrual method of accounting with respect to purchases and sales may use the cash method in computing all other items of income and expense. However, a taxpayer who uses the cash method of accounting in computing gross income from his trade or business shall use the cash method in computing expenses of such trade or business. Similarly, a taxpayer who uses an accrual method of accounting in computing business expenses shall use an accrual method in computing items affecting gross income from his trade or business.
(b) A taxpayer using one method of accounting in computing items of income and deductions of his trade or business may compute other items of income and deductions not connected with his trade or business under a different method of accounting.
(2) Special rules. (i) In any case in which it is necessary to use an inventory, the accrual method of accounting must be used with regard to purchases and sales unless:
(A) The taxpayer qualifies as a small business taxpayer for the taxable year under section 471(c), or
(B) Otherwise authorized under paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section.
(ii) No method of accounting will be regarded as clearly reflecting income unless all items of gross profit and deductions are treated with consistency from year to year. The Commissioner may authorize a taxpayer to adopt or change to a method of accounting permitted by this chapter although the method is not specifically described in the regulations in this part if, in the opinion of the Commissioner, income is clearly reflected by the use of such method. Further, the Commissioner may authorize a taxpayer to continue the use of a method of accounting consistently used by the taxpayer, even though not specifically authorized by the regulations in this part, if, in the opinion of the Commissioner, income is clearly reflected by the use of such method. See section 446(a) and paragraph (a) of this section, which require that taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books, and section 446(e) and paragraph (e) of this section, which require the prior approval of the Commissioner in the case of changes in accounting method.
(iii) The timing rules of § 1.1502-13 are a method of accounting for intercompany transactions (as defined in § 1.1502-13(b)(1)(i)), to be applied by each member of a consolidated group in addition to the member's other methods of accounting. See § 1.1502-13(a)(3)(i). This paragraph (c)(2)(iii) is applicable to consolidated return years beginning on or after November 7, 2001.
(3) Applicability date. The first sentence of paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section and paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 5, 2021. However, for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 5, 2021, a taxpayer may apply the rules provided in the first sentence of this paragraph (c)(3), provided that the taxpayer follows all the applicable rules contained in the regulations under section 446 for such taxable year and all subsequent taxable years.
(d) Taxpayer engaged in more than one business. (1) Where a taxpayer has two or more separate and distinct trades or businesses, a different method of accounting may be used for each trade or business, provided the method used for each trade or business clearly reflects the income of that particular trade or business. For example, a taxpayer may account for the operations of a personal service business on the cash receipts and disbursements method and of a manufacturing business on an accrual method, provided such businesses are separate and distinct and the methods used for each clearly reflect income. The method first used in accounting for business income and deductions in connection with each trade or business, as evidenced in the taxpayer's income tax return in which such income or deductions are first reported, must be consistently followed thereafter.
(2) No trade or business will be considered separate and distinct for purposes of this paragraph unless a complete and separable set of books and records is kept for such trade or business.
(3) If, by reason of maintaining different methods of accounting, there is a creation or shifting of profits or losses between the trades or businesses of the taxpayer (for example, through inventory adjustments, sales, purchases, or expenses) so that income of the taxpayer is not clearly reflected, the trades or businesses of the taxpayer will not be considered to be separate and distinct.
(e) Requirement respecting the adoption or change of accounting method. (1) A taxpayer filing his first return may adopt any permissible method of accounting in computing taxable income for the taxable year covered by such return. See section 446(c) and paragraph (c) of this section for permissible methods. Moreover, a taxpayer may adopt any permissible method of accounting in connection with each separate and distinct trade or business, the income from which is reported for the first time. See section 446(d) and paragraph (d) of this section. See also section 446(a) and paragraph (a) of this section.
(2)(i) Except as otherwise expressly provided in chapter 1 of the Code and the regulations thereunder, a taxpayer who changes the method of accounting employed in keeping his books shall, before computing his income upon such new method for purposes of taxation, secure the consent of the Commissioner. Consent must be secured whether or not such method is proper or is permitted under the Internal Revenue Code or the regulations thereunder.
(ii) (a) A change in the method of accounting includes a change in the overall plan of accounting for gross income or deductions or a change in the treatment of any material item used in such overall plan. Although a method of accounting may exist under this definition without the necessity of a pattern of consistent treatment of an item, in most instances a method of accounting is not established for an item without such consistent treatment. A material item is any item that involves the proper time for the inclusion of the item in income or the taking of a deduction. Changes in method of accounting include a change from the cash receipts and disbursement method to an accrual method, or vice versa, a change involving the method or basis used in the valuation of inventories (see sections 471 and 472 and the regulations under sections 471 and 472), a change from the cash or accrual method to a long-term contract method, or vice versa (see § 1.460-4), certain changes in computing depreciation or amortization (see paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) of this section), a change involving the adoption, use or discontinuance of any other specialized method of computing taxable income, such as the crop method, and a change where the Internal Revenue Code and regulations under the Internal Revenue Code specifically require that the consent of the Commissioner must be obtained before adopting such a change.
(b) A change in method of accounting does not include correction of mathematical or posting errors, or errors in the computation of tax liability (such as errors in computation of the foreign tax credit, net operating loss, percentage depletion, or investment credit). Also, a change in method of accounting does not include adjustment of any item of income or deduction that does not involve the proper time for the inclusion of the item of income or the taking of a deduction. For example, corrections of items that are deducted as interest or salary, but that are in fact payments of dividends, and of items that are deducted as business expenses, but that are in fact personal expenses, are not changes in method of accounting. In addition, a change in the method of accounting does not include an adjustment with respect to the addition to a reserve for bad debts. Although such adjustment may involve the question of the proper time for the taking of a deduction, such items are traditionally corrected by adjustment in the current and future years. For the treatment of the adjustment of the addition to a bad debt reserve (for example, for banks under section 585 of the Internal Revenue Code), see the regulations under section 166 of the Internal Revenue Code. A change in the method of accounting also does not include a change in treatment resulting from a change in underlying facts. For further guidance on changes involving depreciable or amortizable assets, see paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) of this section and § 1.1016-3(h).
(c) A change in an overall plan or system of identifying or valuing items in inventory is a change in method of accounting. Also a change in the treatment of any material item used in the overall plan for identifying or valuing items in inventory is a change in method of accounting.
(d) Changes involving depreciable or amortizable assets—(1) Scope. This paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) applies to property subject to section 167, 168, 197, 1400I, 1400L(c), to section 168 prior to its amendment by the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 2121) (former section 168), or to an additional first year depreciation deduction provision of the Internal Revenue Code (for example, section 168(k), 1400L(b), or 1400N(d)).
(2) Changes in depreciation or amortization that are a change in method of accounting. Except as provided in paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(3) of this section, a change in the treatment of an asset from nondepreciable or nonamortizable to depreciable or amortizable, or vice versa, is a change in method of accounting. Additionally, a correction to require depreciation or amortization in lieu of a deduction for the cost of depreciable or amortizable assets that had been consistently treated as an expense in the year of purchase, or vice versa, is a change in method of accounting. Further, except as provided in paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(3) of this section, the following changes in computing depreciation or amortization are a change in method of accounting:
(i) A change in the depreciation or amortization method, period of recovery, or convention of a depreciable or amortizable asset.
(ii) A change from not claiming to claiming the additional first year depreciation deduction provided by, for example, section 168(k), 1400L(b), or 1400N(d), for, and the resulting change to the amount otherwise allowable as a depreciation deduction for the remaining adjusted depreciable basis (or similar basis) of, depreciable property that qualifies for the additional first year depreciation deduction (for example, qualified property, 50-percent bonus depreciation property, qualified New York Liberty Zone property, or qualified Gulf Opportunity Zone property), provided the taxpayer did not make the election out of the additional first year depreciation deduction (or did not make a deemed election out of the additional first year depreciation deduction; for further guidance, for example, see Rev. Proc. 2002-33 (2002-1 C.B. 963), Rev. Proc. 2003-50 (2003-2 C.B. 119), Notice 2006-77 (2006-40 I.R.B. 590), and § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter) for the class of property in which the depreciable property that qualifies for the additional first year depreciation deduction (for example, qualified property, 50-percent bonus depreciation property, qualified New York Liberty Zone property, or qualified Gulf Opportunity Zone property) is included.
(iii) A change from claiming the 30-percent additional first year depreciation deduction to claiming the 50-percent additional first year depreciation deduction for depreciable property that qualifies for the 50-percent additional first year depreciation deduction, provided the property is not included in any class of property for which the taxpayer elected the 30-percent, instead of the 50-percent, additional first year depreciation deduction (for example, 50-percent bonus depreciation property or qualified Gulf Opportunity Zone property), or a change from claiming the 50-percent additional first year depreciation deduction to claiming the 30-percent additional first year depreciation deduction for depreciable property that qualifies for the 30-percent additional first year depreciation deduction, including property that is included in a class of property for which the taxpayer elected the 30-percent, instead of the 50-percent, additional first year depreciation deduction (for example, qualified property or qualified New York Liberty Zone property), and the resulting change to the amount otherwise allowable as a depreciation deduction for the property's remaining adjusted depreciable basis (or similar basis). This paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(2)(iii) does not apply if a taxpayer is making a late election or revoking a timely valid election under the applicable additional first year depreciation deduction provision of the Internal Revenue Code (for example, section 168(k), 1400L(b), or 1400N(d)) (see paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(3)(iii) of this section).
(iv) A change from claiming to not claiming the additional first year depreciation deduction for an asset that does not qualify for the additional first year depreciation deduction, including an asset that is included in a class of property for which the taxpayer elected not to claim any additional first year depreciation deduction (for example, an asset that is not qualified property, 50-percent bonus depreciation property, qualified New York Liberty Zone property, or qualified Gulf Opportunity Zone property), and the resulting change to the amount otherwise allowable as a depreciation deduction for the property's depreciable basis.
(v) A change in salvage value to zero for a depreciable or amortizable asset for which the salvage value is expressly treated as zero by the Internal Revenue Code (for example, section 168(b)(4)), the regulations under the Internal Revenue Code (for example, § 1.197-2(f)(1)(ii)), or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
(vi) A change in the accounting for depreciable or amortizable assets from a single asset account to a multiple asset account (pooling), or vice versa, or from one type of multiple asset account (pooling) to a different type of multiple asset account (pooling).
(vii) For depreciable or amortizable assets that are mass assets accounted for in multiple asset accounts or pools, a change in the method of identifying which assets have been disposed. For purposes of this paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(2)(vii), the term mass assets means a mass or group of individual items of depreciable or amortizable assets that are not necessarily homogeneous, each of which is minor in value relative to the total value of the mass or group, numerous in quantity, usually accounted for only on a total dollar or quantity basis, with respect to which separate identification is impracticable, and placed in service in the same taxable year.
(viii) Any other change in depreciation or amortization as the Secretary may designate by publication in the Federal Register or in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see § 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter).
(3) Changes in depreciation or amortization that are not a change in method of accounting. Section 1.446-1(e)(2)(ii)(b) applies to determine whether a change in depreciation or amortization is not a change in method of accounting. Further, the following changes in depreciation or amortization are not a change in method of accounting:
(i) Useful life. An adjustment in the useful life of a depreciable or amortizable asset for which depreciation is determined under section 167 (other than under section 168, section 1400I, section 1400L(c), former section 168, or an additional first year depreciation deduction provision of the Internal Revenue Code (for example, section 168(k), 1400L(b), or 1400N(d))) is not a change in method of accounting. This paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(3)(i) does not apply if a taxpayer is changing to or from a useful life (or recovery period or amortization period) that is specifically assigned by the Internal Revenue Code (for example, section 167(f)(1), section 168(c), section 168(g)(2) or (3), section 197), the regulations under the Internal Revenue Code, or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin and, therefore, such change is a change in method of accounting (unless paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(3)(v) of this section applies). See paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(5)(iv) of this section for determining the taxable year in which to correct an adjustment in useful life that is not a change in method of accounting.
(ii) Change in use. A change in computing depreciation or amortization allowances in the taxable year in which the use of an asset changes in the hands of the same taxpayer is not a change in method of accounting.
(iii) Elections. Generally, the making of a late depreciation or amortization election or the revocation of a timely valid depreciation or amortization election is not a change in method of accounting, except as otherwise expressly provided by the Internal Revenue Code, the regulations under the Internal Revenue Code, or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. This paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(3)(iii) also applies to making a late election or revoking a timely valid election made under section 13261(g)(2) or (3) of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 (107 Stat. 312, 540) (relating to amortizable section 197 intangibles). A taxpayer may request consent to make a late election or revoke a timely valid election by submitting a request for a private letter ruling. For making or revoking an election under section 179 of the Internal Revenue Code, see section 179(c) and § 1.179-5.
(iv) Salvage value. Except as provided under paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(2)(v) of this section, a change in salvage value of a depreciable or amortizable asset is not treated as a change in method of accounting.
(v) Placed-in-service date. Except as otherwise expressly provided by the Internal Revenue Code, the regulations under the Internal Revenue Code, or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, any change in the placed-in-service date of a depreciable or amortizable asset is not treated as a change in method of accounting. For example, if a taxpayer changes the placed-in-service date of a depreciable or amortizable asset because the taxpayer incorrectly determined the date on which the asset was placed in service, such a change is a change in the placed-in-service date of the asset and, therefore, is not a change in method of accounting. However, if a taxpayer incorrectly determines that a depreciable or amortizable asset is nondepreciable property and later changes the treatment of the asset to depreciable property, such a change is not a change in the placed-in-service date of the asset and, therefore, is a change in method of accounting under paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(2) of this section. Further, a change in the convention of a depreciable or amortizable asset is not a change in the placed-in-service date of the asset and, therefore, is a change in method of accounting under paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(2)(i) of this section. See paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(5)(v) of this section for determining the taxable year in which to make a change in the placed-in-service date of a depreciable or amortizable asset that is not a change in method of accounting.
(vi) Any other change in depreciation or amortization as the Secretary may designate by publication in the Federal Register or in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see § 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter).
(4) Item being changed. For purposes of a change in depreciation or amortization to which this paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) applies, the item being changed generally is the depreciation treatment of each individual depreciable or amortizable asset. However, the item is the depreciation treatment of each vintage account with respect to a depreciable asset for which depreciation is determined under § 1.167(a)-11 (class life asset depreciation range (CLADR) property). Similarly, the item is the depreciable treatment of each general asset account with respect to a depreciable asset for which general asset account treatment has been elected under section 168(i)(4) or the item is the depreciation treatment of each mass asset account with respect to a depreciable asset for which mass asset account treatment has been elected under former section 168(d)(2)(A). Further, a change in computing depreciation or amortization under section 167 (other than under section 168, section 1400I, section 1400L(c), former section 168, or an additional first year depreciation deduction provision of the Internal Revenue Code (for example, section 168(k), 1400L(b), or 1400N(d))) is permitted only with respect to all assets in a particular account (as defined in § 1.167(a)-7) or vintage account.
(5) Special rules. For purposes of a change in depreciation or amortization to which this paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) applies—
(i) Declining balance method to the straight line method for MACRS property. For tangible, depreciable property subject to section 168 (MACRS property) that is depreciated using the 200-percent or 150-percent declining balance method of depreciation under section 168(b)(1) or (2), a taxpayer may change without the consent of the Commissioner from the declining balance method of depreciation to the straight line method of depreciation in the first taxable year in which the use of the straight line method with respect to the adjusted depreciable basis of the MACRS property as of the beginning of that year will yield a depreciation allowance that is greater than the depreciation allowance yielded by the use of the declining balance method. When the change is made, the adjusted depreciable basis of the MACRS property as of the beginning of the taxable year is recovered through annual depreciation allowances over the remaining recovery period (for further guidance, see section 6.06 of Rev. Proc. 87-57 (1987-2 C.B. 687) and § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter).
(ii) Depreciation method changes for section 167 property. For a depreciable or amortizable asset for which depreciation is determined under section 167 (other than under section 168, section 1400I, section 1400L(c), former section 168, or an additional first year depreciation deduction provision of the Internal Revenue Code (for example, section 168(k), 1400L(b), or 1400N(d))), see § 1.167(e)-1(b), (c), and (d) for the changes in depreciation method that are permitted to be made without the consent of the Commissioner. For CLADR property, see § 1.167(a)-11(c)(1)(iii) for the changes in depreciation method for CLADR property that are permitted to be made without the consent of the Commissioner. Further, see § 1.167(a)-11(b)(4)(iii)(c) for how to correct an incorrect classification or characterization of CLADR property.
(iii) Section 481 adjustment. Except as otherwise expressly provided by the Internal Revenue Code, the regulations under the Internal Revenue Code, or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, no section 481 adjustment is required or permitted for a change from one permissible method of computing depreciation or amortization to another permissible method of computing depreciation or amortization for an asset because this change is implemented by either a cut-off method (for further guidance, for example, see section 2.06 of Rev. Proc. 97-27 (1997-1 C.B. 680), section 2.06 of Rev. Proc. 2002-9 (2002-1 C.B. 327), and § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter) or a modified cut-off method (under which the adjusted depreciable basis of the asset as of the beginning of the year of change is recovered using the new permissible method of accounting), as appropriate. However, a change from an impermissible method of computing depreciation or amortization to a permissible method of computing depreciation or amortization for an asset results in a section 481 adjustment. Similarly, a change in the treatment of an asset from nondepreciable or nonamortizable to depreciable or amortizable (or vice versa) or a change in the treatment of an asset from expensing to depreciating (or vice versa) results in a section 481 adjustment.
(iv) Change in useful life. This paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(5)(iv) applies to an adjustment in the useful life of a depreciable or amortizable asset for which depreciation is determined under section 167 (other than under section 168, section 1400I, section 1400L(c), former section 168, or an additional first year depreciation deduction provision of the Internal Revenue Code (for example, section 168(k), 1400L(b), or 1400N(d))) and that is not a change in method of accounting under paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) of this section. For this adjustment in useful life, no section 481 adjustment is required or permitted. The adjustment in useful life, whether initiated by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or a taxpayer, is corrected by adjustments in the taxable year in which the conditions known to exist at the end of that taxable year changed thereby resulting in a redetermination of the useful life under § 1.167(a)-1(b) (or if the period of limitation for assessment under section 6501(a) has expired for that taxable year, in the first succeeding taxable year open under the period of limitation for assessment), and in subsequent taxable years. In other situations (for example, the useful life is incorrectly determined in the placed-in-service year), the adjustment in the useful life, whether initiated by the IRS or a taxpayer, may be corrected by adjustments in the earliest taxable year open under the period of limitation for assessment under section 6501(a) or the earliest taxable year under examination by the IRS but in no event earlier than the placed-in-service year of the asset, and in subsequent taxable years. However, if a taxpayer initiates the correction in useful life, in lieu of filing amended Federal tax returns (for example, because the conditions known to exist at the end of a prior taxable year changed thereby resulting in a redetermination of the useful life under § 1.167(a)-1(b)), the taxpayer may correct the adjustment in useful life by adjustments in the current and subsequent taxable years.
(v) Change in placed-in-service date. This paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(5)(v) applies to a change in the placed-in-service date of a depreciable or amortizable asset that is not a change in method of accounting under paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) of this section. For this change in placed-in-service date, no section 481 adjustment is required or permitted. The change in placed-in-service date, whether initiated by the IRS or a taxpayer, may be corrected by adjustments in the earliest taxable year open under the period of limitation for assessment under section 6501(a) or the earliest taxable year under examination by the IRS but in no event earlier than the placed-in-service year of the asset, and in subsequent taxable years. However, if a taxpayer initiates the change in placed-in-service date, in lieu of filing amended Federal tax returns, the taxpayer may correct the placed-in-service date by adjustments in the current and subsequent taxable years.
(iii) Examples. The rules of this paragraph (e) are illustrated by the following examples:
(3)(i) Except as otherwise provided under the authority of paragraph (e)(3)(ii) of this section, to secure the Commissioner's consent to a taxpayer's change in method of accounting the taxpayer generally must file an application on Form 3115, “Application for Change in Accounting Method,” with the Commissioner during the taxable year in which the taxpayer desires to make the change in method of accounting. See §§ 1.381(c)(4)-1(d)(2) and 1.381(c)(5)-1(d)(2) for rules allowing additional time, in some circumstances, for the filing of an application on Form 3115 with respect to a transaction to which section 381(a) applies. To the extent applicable, the taxpayer must furnish all information requested on the Form 3115. This information includes all classes of items that will be treated differently under the new method of accounting, any amounts that will be duplicated or omitted as a result of the proposed change, and the taxpayer's computation of any adjustments necessary to prevent such duplications or omissions. The Commissioner may require such other information as may be necessary to determine whether the proposed change will be permitted. Permission to change a taxpayer's method of accounting will not be granted unless the taxpayer agrees to the Commissioner's prescribed terms and conditions for effecting the change, including the taxable year or years in which any adjustment necessary to prevent amounts from being duplicated or omitted is to be taken into account. See section 481 and the regulations thereunder, relating to certain adjustments resulting from accounting method changes, and section 472 and the regulations thereunder, relating to adjustments for changes to and from the last-in, first-out inventory method. For any Form 3115 filed on or after May 15, 1997, see § 1.446-1T(e)(3)(i)(B).
(ii) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section, the Commissioner may prescribe administrative procedures under which taxpayers will be permitted to change their method of accounting. The administrative procedures shall prescribe those terms and conditions necessary to obtain the Commissioner's consent to effect the change and to prevent amounts from being duplicated or omitted. The terms and conditions that may be prescribed by the Commissioner may include terms and conditions that require the change in method of accounting to be effected on a cut-off basis or by an adjustment under section 481(a) to be taken into account in the taxable year or years prescribed by the Commissioner.
(iii) This paragraph (e)(3) applies to Forms 3115 filed on or after December 31, 1997. For other Forms 3115, see § 1.446-1(e)(3) in effect prior to December 31, 1997 (§ 1.446-1(e)(3) as contained in the 26 CFR part 1 edition revised as of April 1, 1997).
(4) Effective date—(i) In general. Except as provided in paragraphs (e)(3)(iii), (e)(4)(ii), and (e)(4)(iii) of this section, paragraph (e) of this section applies on or after December 30, 2003. For the applicability of regulations before December 30, 2003, see § 1.446-1(e) in effect prior to December 30, 2003 (§ 1.446-1(e) as contained in 26 CFR part 1 edition revised as of April 1, 2003).
(ii) Changes involving depreciable or amortizable assets. With respect to paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) of this section, paragraph (e)(2)(iii) Examples 9 through 19 of this section, and the language “certain changes in computing depreciation or amortization (see paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) of this section)” in the last sentence of paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(a) of this section—
(A) For any change in depreciation or amortization that is a change in method of accounting, this section applies to such a change in method of accounting made by a taxpayer for a depreciable or amortizable asset placed in service by the taxpayer in a taxable year ending on or after December 30, 2003; and
(B) For any change in depreciation or amortization that is not a change in method of accounting, this section applies to such a change made by a taxpayer for a depreciable or amortizable asset placed in service by the taxpayer in a taxable year ending on or after December 30, 2003.
(iii) Effective/applicability date for paragraph (e)(3)(i). The rules of paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section apply to corporate reorganizations and tax-free liquidations described in section 381(a) that occur on or after August 31, 2011.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-1(a)General rule.
General rule. (1) Section 446(a) provides that taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which a taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books. The term “method of accounting” includes not only the overall method of accounting of the taxpayer but also the accounting treatment of any item. Examples of such over-all methods are the cash receipts and disbursements method, an accrual method, combinations of such methods, and combinations of the foregoing with various methods provided for the accounting treatment of special items. These methods of accounting for special items include the accounting treatment prescribed for research and experimental expenditures, soil and water conservation expenditures, depreciation, net operating losses, etc. Except for deviations permitted or required by such special accounting treatment, taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books. For requirement respecting the adoption or change of accounting method, see section 446(e) and paragraph (e) of this section.
(2) It is recognized that no uniform method of accounting can be prescribed for all taxpayers. Each taxpayer shall adopt such forms and systems as are, in his judgment, best suited to his needs. However, no method of accounting is acceptable unless, in the opinion of the Commissioner, it clearly reflects income. A method of accounting which reflects the consistent application of generally accepted accounting principles in a particular trade or business in accordance with accepted conditions or practices in that trade or business will ordinarily be regarded as clearly reflecting income, provided all items of gross income and expense are treated consistently from year to year.
(3) Items of gross income and expenditures which are elements in the computation of taxable income need not be in the form of cash. It is sufficient that such items can be valued in terms of money. For general rules relating to the taxable year for inclusion of income and for taking deductions, see sections 451 and 461, and the regulations thereunder.
(4) Each taxpayer is required to make a return of his taxable income for each taxable year and must maintain such accounting records as will enable him to file a correct return. See section 6001 and the regulations thereunder.
Accounting records include the taxpayer's regular books of account and such other records and data as may be necessary to support the entries on his books of account and on his return, as for example, a reconciliation of any differences between such books and his return. The following are among the essential features that must be considered in maintaining such records:
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-1(b)A change in method of accounting does not include correction of mathematical or posting errors, or errors in the computation of tax liability (such as errors in computation of the foreign tax credit, net operating loss, percentage depletion, or investment credit).
A change in method of accounting does not include correction of mathematical or posting errors, or errors in the computation of tax liability (such as errors in computation of the foreign tax credit, net operating loss, percentage depletion, or investment credit). Also, a change in method of accounting does not include adjustment of any item of income or deduction that does not involve the proper time for the inclusion of the item of income or the taking of a deduction. For example, corrections of items that are deducted as interest or salary, but that are in fact payments of dividends, and of items that are deducted as business expenses, but that are in fact personal expenses, are not changes in method of accounting. In addition, a change in the method of accounting does not include an adjustment with respect to the addition to a reserve for bad debts. Although such adjustment may involve the question of the proper time for the taking of a deduction, such items are traditionally corrected by adjustment in the current and future years. For the treatment of the adjustment of the addition to a bad debt reserve (for example, for banks under section 585 of the Internal Revenue Code), see the regulations under section 166 of the Internal Revenue Code. A change in the method of accounting also does not include a change in treatment resulting from a change in underlying facts. For further guidance on changes involving depreciable or amortizable assets, see paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) of this section and § 1.1016-3(h).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-1(c)A change in an overall plan or system of identifying or valuing items in inventory is a change in method of accounting.
A change in an overall plan or system of identifying or valuing items in inventory is a change in method of accounting. Also a change in the treatment of any material item used in the overall plan for identifying or valuing items in inventory is a change in method of accounting.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-1(d)Changes involving depreciable or amortizable assets—(1) Scope.
Changes involving depreciable or amortizable assets—(1) Scope. This paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) applies to property subject to section 167, 168, 197, 1400I, 1400L(c), to section 168 prior to its amendment by the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 2121) (former section 168), or to an additional first year depreciation deduction provision of the Internal Revenue Code (for example, section 168(k), 1400L(b), or 1400N(d)).
(2) Changes in depreciation or amortization that are a change in method of accounting. Except as provided in paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(3) of this section, a change in the treatment of an asset from nondepreciable or nonamortizable to depreciable or amortizable, or vice versa, is a change in method of accounting. Additionally, a correction to require depreciation or amortization in lieu of a deduction for the cost of depreciable or amortizable assets that had been consistently treated as an expense in the year of purchase, or vice versa, is a change in method of accounting. Further, except as provided in paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(3) of this section, the following changes in computing depreciation or amortization are a change in method of accounting:
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-1(e)Requirement respecting the adoption or change of accounting method.
Requirement respecting the adoption or change of accounting method. (1) A taxpayer filing his first return may adopt any permissible method of accounting in computing taxable income for the taxable year covered by such return. See section 446(c) and paragraph (c) of this section for permissible methods. Moreover, a taxpayer may adopt any permissible method of accounting in connection with each separate and distinct trade or business, the income from which is reported for the first time. See section 446(d) and paragraph (d) of this section. See also section 446(a) and paragraph (a) of this section.
(2)(i) Except as otherwise expressly provided in chapter 1 of the Code and the regulations thereunder, a taxpayer who changes the method of accounting employed in keeping his books shall, before computing his income upon such new method for purposes of taxation, secure the consent of the Commissioner. Consent must be secured whether or not such method is proper or is permitted under the Internal Revenue Code or the regulations thereunder.
(ii) (a) A change in the method of accounting includes a change in the overall plan of accounting for gross income or deductions or a change in the treatment of any material item used in such overall plan. Although a method of accounting may exist under this definition without the necessity of a pattern of consistent treatment of an item, in most instances a method of accounting is not established for an item without such consistent treatment. A material item is any item that involves the proper time for the inclusion of the item in income or the taking of a deduction. Changes in method of accounting include a change from the cash receipts and disbursement method to an accrual method, or vice versa, a change involving the method or basis used in the valuation of inventories (see sections 471 and 472 and the regulations under sections 471 and 472), a change from the cash or accrual method to a long-term contract method, or vice versa (see § 1.460-4), certain changes in computing depreciation or amortization (see paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) of this section), a change involving the adoption, use or discontinuance of any other specialized method of computing taxable income, such as the crop method, and a change where the Internal Revenue Code and regulations under the Internal Revenue Code specifically require that the consent of the Commissioner must be obtained before adopting such a change.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-1(i)Declining balance method to the straight line method for MACRS property.
Declining balance method to the straight line method for MACRS property. For tangible, depreciable property subject to section 168 (MACRS property) that is depreciated using the 200-percent or 150-percent declining balance method of depreciation under section 168(b)(1) or (2), a taxpayer may change without the consent of the Commissioner from the declining balance method of depreciation to the straight line method of depreciation in the first taxable year in which the use of the straight line method with respect to the adjusted depreciable basis of the MACRS property as of the beginning of that year will yield a depreciation allowance that is greater than the depreciation allowance yielded by the use of the declining balance method. When the change is made, the adjusted depreciable basis of the MACRS property as of the beginning of the taxable year is recovered through annual depreciation allowances over the remaining recovery period (for further guidance, see section 6.06 of Rev. Proc. 87-57 (1987-2 C.B. 687) and § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter).
(ii) Depreciation method changes for section 167 property. For a depreciable or amortizable asset for which depreciation is determined under section 167 (other than under section 168, section 1400I, section 1400L(c), former section 168, or an additional first year depreciation deduction provision of the Internal Revenue Code (for example, section 168(k), 1400L(b), or 1400N(d))), see § 1.167(e)-1(b), (c), and (d) for the changes in depreciation method that are permitted to be made without the consent of the Commissioner. For CLADR property, see § 1.167(a)-11(c)(1)(iii) for the changes in depreciation method for CLADR property that are permitted to be made without the consent of the Commissioner. Further, see § 1.167(a)-11(b)(4)(iii)(c) for how to correct an incorrect classification or characterization of CLADR property.
(iii) Section 481 adjustment. Except as otherwise expressly provided by the Internal Revenue Code, the regulations under the Internal Revenue Code, or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, no section 481 adjustment is required or permitted for a change from one permissible method of computing depreciation or amortization to another permissible method of computing depreciation or amortization for an asset because this change is implemented by either a cut-off method (for further guidance, for example, see section 2.06 of Rev. Proc. 97-27 (1997-1 C.B. 680), section 2.06 of Rev. Proc. 2002-9 (2002-1 C.B. 327), and § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter) or a modified cut-off method (under which the adjusted depreciable basis of the asset as of the beginning of the year of change is recovered using the new permissible method of accounting), as appropriate. However, a change from an impermissible method of computing depreciation or amortization to a permissible method of computing depreciation or amortization for an asset results in a section 481 adjustment. Similarly, a change in the treatment of an asset from nondepreciable or nonamortizable to depreciable or amortizable (or vice versa) or a change in the treatment of an asset from expensing to depreciating (or vice versa) results in a section 481 adjustment.
(iv) Change in useful life. This paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(5)(iv) applies to an adjustment in the useful life of a depreciable or amortizable asset for which depreciation is determined under section 167 (other than under section 168, section 1400I, section 1400L(c), former section 168, or an additional first year depreciation deduction provision of the Internal Revenue Code (for example, section 168(k), 1400L(b), or 1400N(d))) and that is not a change in method of accounting under paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) of this section. For this adjustment in useful life, no section 481 adjustment is required or permitted. The adjustment in useful life, whether initiated by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or a taxpayer, is corrected by adjustments in the taxable year in which the conditions known to exist at the end of that taxable year changed thereby resulting in a redetermination of the useful life under § 1.167(a)-1(b) (or if the period of limitation for assessment under section 6501(a) has expired for that taxable year, in the first succeeding taxable year open under the period of limitation for assessment), and in subsequent taxable years. In other situations (for example, the useful life is incorrectly determined in the placed-in-service year), the adjustment in the useful life, whether initiated by the IRS or a taxpayer, may be corrected by adjustments in the earliest taxable year open under the period of limitation for assessment under section 6501(a) or the earliest taxable year under examination by the IRS but in no event earlier than the placed-in-service year of the asset, and in subsequent taxable years. However, if a taxpayer initiates the correction in useful life, in lieu of filing amended Federal tax returns (for example, because the conditions known to exist at the end of a prior taxable year changed thereby resulting in a redetermination of the useful life under § 1.167(a)-1(b)), the taxpayer may correct the adjustment in useful life by adjustments in the current and subsequent taxable years.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-1(v)Change in placed-in-service date.
Change in placed-in-service date. This paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d)(5)(v) applies to a change in the placed-in-service date of a depreciable or amortizable asset that is not a change in method of accounting under paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) of this section. For this change in placed-in-service date, no section 481 adjustment is required or permitted. The change in placed-in-service date, whether initiated by the IRS or a taxpayer, may be corrected by adjustments in the earliest taxable year open under the period of limitation for assessment under section 6501(a) or the earliest taxable year under examination by the IRS but in no event earlier than the placed-in-service year of the asset, and in subsequent taxable years. However, if a taxpayer initiates the change in placed-in-service date, in lieu of filing amended Federal tax returns, the taxpayer may correct the placed-in-service date by adjustments in the current and subsequent taxable years.
(iii) Examples. The rules of this paragraph (e) are illustrated by the following examples:
(3)(i) Except as otherwise provided under the authority of paragraph (e)(3)(ii) of this section, to secure the Commissioner's consent to a taxpayer's change in method of accounting the taxpayer generally must file an application on Form 3115, “Application for Change in Accounting Method,” with the Commissioner during the taxable year in which the taxpayer desires to make the change in method of accounting. See §§ 1.381(c)(4)-1(d)(2) and 1.381(c)(5)-1(d)(2) for rules allowing additional time, in some circumstances, for the filing of an application on Form 3115 with respect to a transaction to which section 381(a) applies. To the extent applicable, the taxpayer must furnish all information requested on the Form 3115. This information includes all classes of items that will be treated differently under the new method of accounting, any amounts that will be duplicated or omitted as a result of the proposed change, and the taxpayer's computation of any adjustments necessary to prevent such duplications or omissions. The Commissioner may require such other information as may be necessary to determine whether the proposed change will be permitted. Permission to change a taxpayer's method of accounting will not be granted unless the taxpayer agrees to the Commissioner's prescribed terms and conditions for effecting the change, including the taxable year or years in which any adjustment necessary to prevent amounts from being duplicated or omitted is to be taken into account. See section 481 and the regulations thereunder, relating to certain adjustments resulting from accounting method changes, and section 472 and the regulations thereunder, relating to adjustments for changes to and from the last-in, first-out inventory method. For any Form 3115 filed on or after May 15, 1997, see § 1.446-1T(e)(3)(i)(B).
(ii) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section, the Commissioner may prescribe administrative procedures under which taxpayers will be permitted to change their method of accounting. The administrative procedures shall prescribe those terms and conditions necessary to obtain the Commissioner's consent to effect the change and to prevent amounts from being duplicated or omitted. The terms and conditions that may be prescribed by the Commissioner may include terms and conditions that require the change in method of accounting to be effected on a cut-off basis or by an adjustment under section 481(a) to be taken into account in the taxable year or years prescribed by the Commissioner.
(iii) This paragraph (e)(3) applies to Forms 3115 filed on or after December 31, 1997. For other Forms 3115, see § 1.446-1(e)(3) in effect prior to December 31, 1997 (§ 1.446-1(e)(3) as contained in the 26 CFR part 1 edition revised as of April 1, 1997).
(4) Effective date—(i) In general. Except as provided in paragraphs (e)(3)(iii), (e)(4)(ii), and (e)(4)(iii) of this section, paragraph (e) of this section applies on or after December 30, 2003. For the applicability of regulations before December 30, 2003, see § 1.446-1(e) in effect prior to December 30, 2003 (§ 1.446-1(e) as contained in 26 CFR part 1 edition revised as of April 1, 2003).
(ii) Changes involving depreciable or amortizable assets. With respect to paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) of this section, paragraph (e)(2)(iii) Examples 9 through 19 of this section, and the language “certain changes in computing depreciation or amortization (see paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(d) of this section)” in the last sentence of paragraph (e)(2)(ii)(a) of this section—
(A) For any change in depreciation or amortization that is a change in method of accounting, this section applies to such a change in method of accounting made by a taxpayer for a depreciable or amortizable asset placed in service by the taxpayer in a taxable year ending on or after December 30, 2003; and
(B) For any change in depreciation or amortization that is not a change in method of accounting, this section applies to such a change made by a taxpayer for a depreciable or amortizable asset placed in service by the taxpayer in a taxable year ending on or after December 30, 2003.
(iii) Effective/applicability date for paragraph (e)(3)(i). The rules of paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section apply to corporate reorganizations and tax-free liquidations described in section 381(a) that occur on or after August 31, 2011.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-2Method of accounting for interest
(a) Applicability—(1) In general. This section provides rules for determining the amount of interest that accrues during an accrual period (other than interest described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section) and for determining the portion of a payment that consists of accrued interest. For purposes of this section, interest includes original issue discount and amounts treated as interest (whether stated or unstated) in any lending or deferred payment transaction. Accrued interest determined under this section is taken into account by a taxpayer under the taxpayer's regular method of accounting (e.g., an accrual method or the cash receipts and disbursements method). Application of an exception described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section to one party to a transaction does not affect the application of this section to any other party to the transaction.
(2) Exceptions—(i) Interest included or deducted under certain other provisions. This section does not apply to interest that is taken into account under—
(A) Sections 1272(a), 1275, and 163(e) (income and deductions relating to original issue discount);
(B) Section 467(a)(2) (certain payments for the use of property or services);
(C) Sections 1276 through 1278 (market discount);
(D) Sections 1281 through 1283 (discount on certain short-term obligations);
(E) Section 7872(a) (certain loans with below-market interest rates);
(F) Section 1.1272-3 (an election by a holder to treat all interest on a debt instrument as original issue discount); or
(G) Section 1.451-3(j) (special ordering rule for specified fees).
(ii) De minimis original issue discount. This section does not apply to de minimis original issue discount (other than de minimis original issue discount treated as qualified stated interest) as determined under § 1.1273-1(d). See § 1.163-7 for the treatment of de minimis original issue discount by the issuer and §§ 1.1273-1(d) and 1.1272-3 for the treatment of de minimis original issue discount by the holder.
(b) Accrual of qualified stated interest. Qualified stated interest (as defined in § 1.1273-1(c)) accrues ratably over the accrual period (or periods) to which it is attributable and accrues at the stated rate for the period (or periods).
(c) Accrual of interest other than qualified stated interest. Subject to the modifications in paragraph (d) of this section, the amount of interest (other than qualified stated interest) that accrues for any accrual period is determined under rules similar to those in the regulations under sections 1272 and 1275 for the accrual of original issue discount. The preceding sentence applies regardless of any contrary formula agreed to by the parties.
(d) Modifications—(1) Issue price. The issue price of the loan or contract is equal to—
(i) In the case of a contract for the sale or exchange of property to which section 483 applies, the amount described in § 1.483-2(a)(1)(i) or (ii), whichever is applicable;
(ii) In the case of a contract for the sale or exchange of property to which section 483 does not apply, the stated principal amount; or
(iii) In any other case, the amount loaned.
(2) Principal payments that are not deferred payments. In the case of a contract to which section 483 applies, principal payments that are not deferred payments are ignored for purposes of determining yield and adjusted issue price.
(e) Allocation of interest to payments—(1) In general. Except as provided in paragraphs (e)(2), (e)(3), and (e)(4) of this section, each payment under a loan (other than payments of additional interest or similar charges provided with respect to amounts that are not paid when due) is treated as a payment of interest to the extent of the accrued and unpaid interest determined under paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section as of the date the payment becomes due.
(2) Special rule for points deductible under section 461(g)(2). If a payment of points is deductible by the borrower under section 461(g)(2), the payment is treated by the borrower as a payment of interest.
(3) Allocation respected in certain small transactions. [Reserved]
(4) Pro rata prepayments. Accrued but unpaid interest is allocated to a pro rata prepayment under rules similar to those for allocating accrued but unpaid original issue discount to a pro rata prepayment under § 1.1275-2(f). For purposes of the preceding sentence, a pro rata prepayment is a payment that is made prior to maturity that—
(i) Is not made pursuant to the contract's payment schedule; and
(ii) Results in a substantially pro rata reduction of each payment remaining to be paid on the contract.
(f) Aggregation rule. For purposes of this section, all contracts calling for deferred payments arising from the same transaction (or a series of related transactions) are treated as a single contract. This rule, however, generally only applies to contracts involving a single borrower and a single lender.
(g) Debt instruments denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar. This section applies to a debt instrument that provides for all payments denominated in, or determined by reference to, the functional currency of the taxpayer or qualified business unit of the taxpayer (even if that currency is other than the U.S. dollar). See § 1.988-2(b) to determine interest income or expense for debt instruments that provide for payments denominated in, or determined by reference to, a nonfunctional currency.
(h) Example. The following example illustrates the rules of this section.
(i) [Reserved]
(j) Effective date. This section applies to debt instruments issued on or after April 4, 1994, and to lending transactions, sales, and exchanges that occur on or after April 4, 1994. Taxpayers, however, may rely on this section for debt instruments issued after December 21, 1992, and before April 4, 1994, and for lending transactions, sales, and exchanges that occur after December 21, 1992, and before April 4, 1994.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-2(a)Applicability—(1) In general.
Applicability—(1) In general. This section provides rules for determining the amount of interest that accrues during an accrual period (other than interest described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section) and for determining the portion of a payment that consists of accrued interest. For purposes of this section, interest includes original issue discount and amounts treated as interest (whether stated or unstated) in any lending or deferred payment transaction. Accrued interest determined under this section is taken into account by a taxpayer under the taxpayer's regular method of accounting (e.g., an accrual method or the cash receipts and disbursements method). Application of an exception described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section to one party to a transaction does not affect the application of this section to any other party to the transaction.
(2) Exceptions—(i) Interest included or deducted under certain other provisions. This section does not apply to interest that is taken into account under—
(A) Sections 1272(a), 1275, and 163(e) (income and deductions relating to original issue discount);
(B) Section 467(a)(2) (certain payments for the use of property or services);
(C) Sections 1276 through 1278 (market discount);
(D) Sections 1281 through 1283 (discount on certain short-term obligations);
(E) Section 7872(a) (certain loans with below-market interest rates);
(F) Section 1.1272-3 (an election by a holder to treat all interest on a debt instrument as original issue discount); or
(G) Section 1.451-3(j) (special ordering rule for specified fees).
(ii) De minimis original issue discount. This section does not apply to de minimis original issue discount (other than de minimis original issue discount treated as qualified stated interest) as determined under § 1.1273-1(d). See § 1.163-7 for the treatment of de minimis original issue discount by the issuer and §§ 1.1273-1(d) and 1.1272-3 for the treatment of de minimis original issue discount by the holder.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-2(b)Accrual of qualified stated interest.
Accrual of qualified stated interest. Qualified stated interest (as defined in § 1.1273-1(c)) accrues ratably over the accrual period (or periods) to which it is attributable and accrues at the stated rate for the period (or periods).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-2(c)Accrual of interest other than qualified stated interest.
Accrual of interest other than qualified stated interest. Subject to the modifications in paragraph (d) of this section, the amount of interest (other than qualified stated interest) that accrues for any accrual period is determined under rules similar to those in the regulations under sections 1272 and 1275 for the accrual of original issue discount. The preceding sentence applies regardless of any contrary formula agreed to by the parties.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-2(d)Modifications—(1) Issue price.
Modifications—(1) Issue price. The issue price of the loan or contract is equal to—
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-2(e)Allocation of interest to payments—(1) In general.
Allocation of interest to payments—(1) In general. Except as provided in paragraphs (e)(2), (e)(3), and (e)(4) of this section, each payment under a loan (other than payments of additional interest or similar charges provided with respect to amounts that are not paid when due) is treated as a payment of interest to the extent of the accrued and unpaid interest determined under paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section as of the date the payment becomes due.
(2) Special rule for points deductible under section 461(g)(2). If a payment of points is deductible by the borrower under section 461(g)(2), the payment is treated by the borrower as a payment of interest.
(3) Allocation respected in certain small transactions. [Reserved]
(4) Pro rata prepayments. Accrued but unpaid interest is allocated to a pro rata prepayment under rules similar to those for allocating accrued but unpaid original issue discount to a pro rata prepayment under § 1.1275-2(f). For purposes of the preceding sentence, a pro rata prepayment is a payment that is made prior to maturity that—
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-2(f)Aggregation rule.
Aggregation rule. For purposes of this section, all contracts calling for deferred payments arising from the same transaction (or a series of related transactions) are treated as a single contract. This rule, however, generally only applies to contracts involving a single borrower and a single lender.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-2(g)Debt instruments denominated in a currency other than the U.
Debt instruments denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar. This section applies to a debt instrument that provides for all payments denominated in, or determined by reference to, the functional currency of the taxpayer or qualified business unit of the taxpayer (even if that currency is other than the U.S. dollar). See § 1.988-2(b) to determine interest income or expense for debt instruments that provide for payments denominated in, or determined by reference to, a nonfunctional currency.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-2(h)Example.
Example. The following example illustrates the rules of this section.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-2(i)§1.446-2(i)
[Reserved]
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-2(j)Effective date.
Effective date. This section applies to debt instruments issued on or after April 4, 1994, and to lending transactions, sales, and exchanges that occur on or after April 4, 1994. Taxpayers, however, may rely on this section for debt instruments issued after December 21, 1992, and before April 4, 1994, and for lending transactions, sales, and exchanges that occur after December 21, 1992, and before April 4, 1994.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-3Notional principal contracts
(a) Table of contents. This paragraph (a) lists captioned paragraphs contained in § 1.446-3.
(a) Table of contents.
(b) Purpose.
(c) Definitions and scope.
(1) Notional principal contract.
(i) In general.
(ii) Excluded contracts.
(iii) Transactions within section 475.
(iv) Transactions within section 988.
(2) Specified index.
(3) Notional principal amount.
(4) Special definitions.
(i) Related person and party to the contract.
(ii) Objective financial information.
(iii) Dealer in notional principal contracts.
(d) Taxable year of inclusion and deduction.
(e) Periodic payments.
(1) Definition.
(2) Recognition rules.
(i) In general.
(ii) Rate set in arrears.
(iii) Notional principal amount set in arrears.
(3) Examples.
(f) Nonperiodic payments.
(1) Definition.
(2) Recognition rules.
(i) In general.
(ii) General rule for swaps.
(iii) Alternative methods for swaps.
(A) Prepaid swaps.
(B) Other nonperiodic swap payments.
(iv) General rule for caps and floors.
(v) Alternative methods for caps and floors that hedge debt instruments.
(A) Prepaid caps and floors.
(B) Other caps and floors.
(C) Special method for collars.
(vi) Additional methods.
(3) Term of extendible or terminable contracts.
(4) Examples.
(g) Special rules.
(1) Disguised notional principal contracts.
(2) Hedged notional principal contracts.
(3) Options and forwards to enter into notional principal contracts.
(4) Swaps with significant nonperiodic payments.
(5) Caps and floors that are significantly in-the-money. [Reserved]
(6) Examples.
(h) Termination payments.
(1) Definition.
(2) Taxable year of inclusion and deduction by original parties.
(3) Taxable year of inclusion and deduction by assignees.
(4) Special rules.
(i) Assignment of one leg of a contract.
(ii) Substance over form.
(5) Examples.
(i) Anti-abuse rule.
(j) Effective date.
(b) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to enable the clear reflection of the income and deductions from notional principal contracts by prescribing accounting methods that reflect the economic substance of such contracts.
(c) Definitions and scope—(1) Notional principal contract—(i) In general. A notional principal contract is a financial instrument that provides for the payment of amounts by one party to another at specified intervals calculated by reference to a specified index upon a notional principal amount in exchange for specified consideration or a promise to pay similar amounts. An agreement between a taxpayer and a qualified business unit (as defined in section 989(a)) of the taxpayer, or among qualified business units of the same taxpayer, is not a notional principal contract because a taxpayer cannot enter into a contract with itself. Notional principal contracts governed by this section include interest rate swaps, currency swaps, basis swaps, interest rate caps, interest rate floors, commodity swaps, equity swaps, equity index swaps, and similar agreements. A collar is not itself a notional principal contract, but certain caps and floors that comprise a collar may be treated as a single notional principal contract under paragraph (f)(2)(v)(C) of this section. A contract may be a notional principal contract governed by this section even though the term of the contract is subject to termination or extension. Each confirmation under a master agreement to enter into agreements governed by this section is treated as a separate notional principal contract.
(ii) Excluded contracts. A contract described in section 1256(b), a futures contract, a forward contract, and an option are not notional principal contracts. An instrument or contract that constitutes indebtedness under general principles of Federal income tax law is not a notional principal contract. An option or forward contract that entitles or obligates a person to enter into a notional principal contract is not a notional principal contract, but payments made under such an option or forward contract may be governed by paragraph (g)(3) of this section.
(iii) Transactions within section 475. To the extent that the rules provided in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section are inconsistent with the rules that apply to any notional principal contract that is governed by section 475 and regulations thereunder, the rules of section 475 and the regulations thereunder govern.
(iv) Transactions within section 988. To the extent that the rules provided in this section are inconsistent with the rules that apply to any notional principal contract that is also a section 988 transaction or that is integrated with other property or debt pursuant to section 988(d), the rules of section 988 and the regulations thereunder govern.
(2) Specified index. A specified index is—
(i) A fixed rate, price, or amount;
(ii) A fixed rate, price, or amount applicable in one or more specified periods followed by one or more different fixed rates, prices, or amounts applicable in other periods;
(iii) An index that is based on objective financial information (as defined in paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of this section); and
(iv) An interest rate index that is regularly used in normal lending transactions between a party to the contract and unrelated persons.
(3) Notional principal amount. For purposes of this section, a notional principal amount is any specified amount of money or property that, when multiplied by a specified index, measures a party's rights and obligations under the contract, but is not borrowed or loaned between the parties as part of the contract. The notional principal amount may vary over the term of the contract, provided that it is set in advance or varies based on objective financial information (as defined in paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of this section).
(4) Special definitions—(i) Related person and party to the contract. A related person is a person related (within the meaning of section 267(b) or 707(b)(1)) to one of the parties to the notional principal contract or a member of the same consolidated group (as defined in § 1.1502-1(h)) as one of the parties to the contract. For purposes of this paragraph (c), a related person is considered to be a party to the contract.
(ii) Objective financial information. For purposes of this paragraph (c), objective financial information is any current, objectively determinable financial or economic information that is not within the control of any of the parties to the contract and is not unique to one of the parties' circumstances (such as one party's dividends, profits, or the value of its stock). Thus, for example, a notional principal amount may be based on a broadly-based equity index or the outstanding balance of a pool of mortgages, but not on the value of a party's stock.
(iii) Dealer in notional principal contracts. A dealer in notional principal contracts is a person who regularly offers to enter into, assume, offset, assign, or otherwise terminate positions in notional principal contracts with customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business.
(d) Taxable year of inclusion and deduction. For all purposes of the Code, the net income or net deduction from a notional principal contract for a taxable year is included in or deducted from gross income for that taxable year. The net income or net deduction from a notional principal contract for a taxable year equals the total of all of the periodic payments that are recognized from that contract for the taxable year under paragraph (e) of this section and all of the nonperiodic payments that are recognized from that contract for the taxable year under paragraph (f) of this section.
(e) Periodic payments—(1) Definition. Periodic payments are payments made or received pursuant to a notional principal contract that are payable at intervals of one year or less during the entire term of the contract (including any extension periods provided for in the contract), that are based on a specified index described in paragraph (c)(2)(i), (iii), or (iv) of this section (appropriately adjusted for the length of the interval), and that are based on either a single notional principal amount or a notional principal amount that varies over the term of the contract in the same proportion as the notional principal amount that measures the other party's payments. Payments to purchase or sell a cap or a floor, however, are not periodic payments.
(2) Recognition rules—(i) In general. All taxpayers, regardless of their method of accounting, must recognize the ratable daily portion of a periodic payment for the taxable year to which that portion relates.
(ii) Rate set in arrears. If the amount of a periodic payment is not determinable at the end of a taxable year because the value of the specified index is not fixed until a date that occurs after the end of the taxable year, the ratable daily portion of a periodic payment that relates to that taxable year is generally based on the specified index that would have applied if the specified index were fixed as of the last day of the taxable year. If a taxpayer determines that the value of the specified index as of the last day of the taxable year does not provide a reasonable estimate of the specified index that will apply when the payment is fixed, the taxpayer may use a reasonable estimate of the specified index each year, provided that the taxpayer (and any related person that is a party to the contract) uses the same method to make the estimate consistently from year to year and uses the same estimate for purposes of all financial reports to equity holders and creditors. The taxpayer's treatment of notional principal contracts with substantially similar specified indices will be considered in determining whether the taxpayer's estimate of the specified index is reasonable. Any difference between the amount that is recognized under this paragraph (e)(2)(ii) and the corresponding portion of the actual payment that becomes fixed under the contract is taken into account as an adjustment to the net income or net deduction from the notional principal contract for the taxable year during which the payment becomes fixed.
(iii) Notional principal amount set in arrears. Rules similar to the rules of paragraph (e)(2)(ii) of this section apply if the amount of a periodic payment is not determinable at the end of a taxable year because the notional principal amount is not fixed until a date that occurs after the end of the taxable year.
(3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of paragraph (e) of this section.
(f) Nonperiodic payments—(1) Definition. A nonperiodic payment is any payment made or received with respect to a notional principal contract that is not a periodic payment (as defined in paragraph (e)(1) of this section) or a termination payment (as defined in paragraph (h) of this section). Examples of nonperiodic payments are the premium for a cap or floor agreement (even if it is paid in installments), the payment for an off-market swap agreement, the prepayment of part or all of one leg of a swap, and the premium for an option to enter into a swap if and when the option is exercised.
(2) Recognition rules—(i) In general. All taxpayers, regardless of their method of accounting, must recognize the ratable daily portion of a nonperiodic payment for the taxable year to which that portion relates. Generally, a nonperiodic payment must be recognized over the term of a notional principal contract in a manner that reflects the economic substance of the contract.
(ii) General rule for swaps. A nonperiodic payment that relates to a swap must be recognized over the term of the contract by allocating it in accordance with the forward rates (or, in the case of a commodity, the forward prices) of a series of cash-settled forward contracts that reflect the specified index and the notional principal amount. For purposes of this allocation, the forward rates or prices used to determine the amount of the nonperiodic payment will be respected, if reasonable. See paragraph (f)(4) Example 7 of this section.
(iii) Alternative methods for swaps. Solely for purposes of determining the timing of income and deductions, a nonperiodic payment made or received with respect to a swap may be allocated to each period of the swap contract using one of the methods described in this paragraph (f)(2)(iii). The alternative methods may not be used by a dealer in notional principal contracts (as defined in paragraph (c)(4)(iii) of this section) for swaps entered into or acquired in its capacity as a dealer.
(A) Prepaid swaps. An upfront payment on a swap may be amortized by assuming that the nonperiodic payment represents the present value of a series of equal payments made throughout the term of the swap contract (the level payment method), adjusted as appropriate to take account of increases or decreases in the notional principal amount. The discount rate used in this calculation must be the rate (or rates) used by the parties to determine the amount of the nonperiodic payment. If that rate is not readily ascertainable, the discount rate used must be a rate that is reasonable under the circumstances. Under this method, an upfront payment is allocated by dividing each equal payment into its principal recovery and time value components. The principal recovery components of the equal payments are treated as periodic payments that are deemed to be made on each of the dates that the swap contract provides for periodic payments by the payor of the nonperiodic payment or, if none, on each of the dates that the swap contract provides for periodic payments by the recipient of the nonperiodic payment. The time value component is needed to compute the amortization of the nonperiodic payment, but is otherwise disregarded. See paragraph (f)(4) Example 5 of this section.
(B) Other nonperiodic swap payments. Nonperiodic payments on a swap other than an upfront payment may be amortized by treating the contract as if it provided for a single upfront payment (equal to the present value of the nonperiodic payments) and a loan between the parties. The discount rate (or rates) used in determining the deemed upfront payment and the time value component of the deemed loan is the same as the rate (or rates) used in the level payment method. The single upfront payment is then amortized under the level payment method described in paragraph (f)(2)(iii)(A) of this section. The time value component of the loan is not treated as interest, but, together with the amortized amount of the deemed upfront payment, is recognized as a periodic payment. See paragraph (f)(4) Example 6 of this section. If both parties make nonperiodic payments, this calculation is done separately for the nonperiodic payments made by each party.
(iv) General rule for caps and floors. A payment to purchase or sell a cap or floor must be recognized over the term of the agreement by allocating it in accordance with the prices of a series of cash-settled option contracts that reflect the specified index and the notional principal amount. For purposes of this allocation, the option pricing used by the parties to determine the total amount paid for the cap or floor will be respected, if reasonable. Only the portion of the purchase price that is allocable to the option contract or contracts that expire during a particular period is recognized for that period. Thus, under this paragraph (f)(2)(iv), straight-line or accelerated amortization of a cap premium is generally not permitted. See paragraph (f)(4) Examples 1 and 2 of this section.
(v) Alternative methods for caps and floors that hedge debt instruments. Solely for purposes of determining the timing of income and deductions, if a cap or floor is entered into primarily to reduce risk with respect to a specific debt instrument or group of debt instruments held or issued by the taxpayer, the taxpayer may amortize a payment to purchase or sell the cap or floor using the methods described in this paragraph (f)(2)(v), adjusted as appropriate to take account of increases or decreases in the notional principal amount. The alternative methods may not be used by a dealer in notional principal contracts (as defined in paragraph (c)(4)(iii) of this section) for caps or floors entered into or acquired in its capacity as a dealer.
(A) Prepaid caps and floors. A premium paid upfront for a cap or a floor may be amortized using the “level payment method” described in paragraph (f)(2)(iii)(A) of this section. See paragraph (f)(4) Example 3 of this section.
(B) Other caps and floors. Nonperiodic payments on a cap or floor other than an upfront payment are amortized by treating the contract as if it provided for a single upfront payment (equal to the present value of the nonperiodic payments) and a loan between the parties as described in paragraph (f)(2)(iii)(B) of this section. Under the level payment method, a cap or floor premium paid in level annual installments over the term of the contract is effectively included or deducted from income ratably, in accordance with the level payments. See paragraph (f)(4) Example 4 of this section.
(C) Special method for collars. A taxpayer may also treat a cap and a floor that comprise a collar as a single notional principal contract and may amortize the net nonperiodic payment to enter into the cap and floor over the term of the collar in accordance with the methods prescribed in this paragraph (f)(2)(v).
(vi) Additional methods. The Commissioner may, by a revenue ruling or a revenue procedure published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, provide alternative methods for allocating nonperiodic payments that relate to a notional principal contract to each year of the contract. See § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter.
(3) Term of extendible or terminable contracts. For purposes of this paragraph (f), the term of a notional principal contract that is subject to extension or termination is the reasonably expected term of the contract.
(4) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of paragraph (f) of this section.
(g) Special rules—(1) Disguised notional principal contracts. The Commissioner may recharacterize all or part of a transaction (or series of transactions) if the effect of the transaction (or series of transactions) is to avoid the application of this section.
(2) Hedged notional principal contracts. If a taxpayer, either directly or through a related person (as defined in paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this section), reduces risk with respect to a notional principal contract by purchasing, selling, or otherwise entering into other notional principal contracts, futures, forwards, options, or other financial contracts (other than debt instruments), the taxpayer may not use the alternative methods provided in paragraphs (f)(2)(iii) and (v) of this section. Moreover, where such positions are entered into to avoid the appropriate timing or character of income from the contracts taken together, the Commissioner may require that amounts paid to or received by the taxpayer under the notional principal contract be treated in a manner that is consistent with the economic substance of the transaction as a whole.
(3) Options and forwards to enter into notional principal contracts. An option or forward contract that entitles or obligates a person to enter into a notional principal contract is subject to the general rules of taxation for options or forward contracts. Any payment with respect to the option or forward contract is treated as a nonperiodic payment for the underlying notional principal contract under the rules of paragraphs (f) and (g)(4) or (g)(5) of this section if and when the underlying notional principal contract is entered into.
(4) Swaps with significant nonperiodic payments—(i) General rule. Except as provided in paragraph (g)(4)(ii) of this section, a swap with significant nonperiodic payments is treated as two separate transactions consisting of an on-market, level payment swap and a loan. The loan must be accounted for by the parties to the contract independently of the swap. The time value component associated with the loan, determined in accordance with paragraph (f)(2)(iii)(A) of this section, is recognized as interest expense to the payor and interest income to the recipient.
(ii) Exception for cleared swaps and non-cleared swaps subject to margin or collateral requirements. Paragraph (g)(4)(i) of this section does not apply to a swap if the contract is described in paragraph (g)(4)(ii)(A) or (B) of this section.
(A) The swap is cleared by a derivatives clearing organization, as such term is defined in section 1a of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1a), or by a clearing agency, as such term is defined in section 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c), that is registered as a derivatives clearing organization under the Commodity Exchange Act or as a clearing agency under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, respectively, and the derivatives clearing organization or clearing agency requires the parties to the swap to post and collect margin or collateral.
(B) The swap is a non-cleared swap that requires the parties to meet the margin or collateral requirements of a federal regulator or that provides for margin or collateral requirements that are substantially similar to a cleared swap or a non-cleared swap subject to the margin or collateral requirements of a federal regulator. For purposes of this paragraph (g)(4)(ii)(B), the term federal regulator means the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), or a prudential regulator, as defined in section 1a(39) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1a), as amended by section 721 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376, Title VII.
(iii) Coordination with section 163(j). For the treatment of swaps with significant nonperiodic payments under section 163(j), see § 1.163(j)-1(b)(22)(ii).
(5) Caps and floors that are significantly in-the-money. [Reserved]
(6) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of paragraph (g) of this section.
(h) Termination payments—(1) Definition. A payment made or received to extinguish or assign all or a proportionate part of the remaining rights and obligations of any party under a notional principal contract is a termination payment to the party making the termination payment and the party receiving the payment. A termination payment includes a payment made between the original parties to the contract (an extinguishment), a payment made between one party to the contract and a third party (an assignment), and any gain or loss realized on the exchange of one notional principal contract for another. Where one party assigns its remaining rights and obligations to a third party, the original nonassigning counterparty realizes gain or loss if the assignment results in a deemed exchange of contracts and a realization event under section 1001.
(2) Taxable year of inclusion and deduction by original parties. Except as otherwise provided (for example, in section 453, section 1092, or § 1.446-4), a party to a notional principal contract recognizes a termination payment in the year the contract is extinguished, assigned, or exchanged. When the termination payment is recognized, the party also recognizes any other payments that have been made or received pursuant to the notional principal contract, but that have not been recognized under paragraph (d) of this section. If only a proportionate part of a party's rights and obligations is extinguished, assigned, or exchanged, then only that proportion of the unrecognized payments is recognized under the previous sentence.
(3) Taxable year of inclusion and deduction by assignees. A termination payment made or received by an assignee pursuant to an assignment of a notional principal contract is recognized by the assignee under the rules of paragraphs (f) and (g)(4) or (g)(5) of this section as a nonperiodic payment for the notional principal contract that is in effect after the assignment.
(4) Special rules—(i) Assignment of one leg of a contract. A payment is not a termination payment if it is made or received by a party in exchange for assigning all or a portion of one leg of a notional principal contract at a time when a substantially proportionate amount of the other leg remains unperformed and unassigned. The payment is either an amount loaned, an amount borrowed, or a nonperiodic payment, depending on the economic substance of the transaction to each party. This paragraph (h)(4)(i) applies whether or not the original notional principal contract is terminated as a result of the assignment.
(ii) Substance over form. Any economic benefit that is given or received by a taxpayer in lieu of a termination payment is a termination payment.
(5) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of this paragraph (h). The contracts in the examples are not hedging transactions as defined in § 1.1221-2(b), and all of the examples assume that no loss-deferral rules apply.
(i) Anti-abuse rule. If a taxpayer enters into a transaction with a principal purpose of applying the rules of this section to produce a material distortion of income, the Commissioner may depart from the rules of this section as necessary to reflect the appropriate timing of income and deductions from the transaction.
(j)(1) Effective/applicability date. These regulations are effective for notional principal contracts entered into on or after December 13, 1993.
(2) The rules provided in paragraph (g)(4) of this section apply to notional principal contracts entered into on or after September 14, 2021. Taxpayers may choose to apply the rules provided in paragraph (g)(4) of this section to notional principal contracts entered into before September 14, 2021.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-3(a)Table of contents.
Table of contents.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-3(b)Purpose.
Purpose. The purpose of this section is to enable the clear reflection of the income and deductions from notional principal contracts by prescribing accounting methods that reflect the economic substance of such contracts.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-3(c)Definitions and scope—(1) Notional principal contract—(i) In general.
Definitions and scope—(1) Notional principal contract—(i) In general. A notional principal contract is a financial instrument that provides for the payment of amounts by one party to another at specified intervals calculated by reference to a specified index upon a notional principal amount in exchange for specified consideration or a promise to pay similar amounts. An agreement between a taxpayer and a qualified business unit (as defined in section 989(a)) of the taxpayer, or among qualified business units of the same taxpayer, is not a notional principal contract because a taxpayer cannot enter into a contract with itself. Notional principal contracts governed by this section include interest rate swaps, currency swaps, basis swaps, interest rate caps, interest rate floors, commodity swaps, equity swaps, equity index swaps, and similar agreements. A collar is not itself a notional principal contract, but certain caps and floors that comprise a collar may be treated as a single notional principal contract under paragraph (f)(2)(v)(C) of this section. A contract may be a notional principal contract governed by this section even though the term of the contract is subject to termination or extension. Each confirmation under a master agreement to enter into agreements governed by this section is treated as a separate notional principal contract.
(ii) Excluded contracts. A contract described in section 1256(b), a futures contract, a forward contract, and an option are not notional principal contracts. An instrument or contract that constitutes indebtedness under general principles of Federal income tax law is not a notional principal contract. An option or forward contract that entitles or obligates a person to enter into a notional principal contract is not a notional principal contract, but payments made under such an option or forward contract may be governed by paragraph (g)(3) of this section.
(iii) Transactions within section 475. To the extent that the rules provided in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section are inconsistent with the rules that apply to any notional principal contract that is governed by section 475 and regulations thereunder, the rules of section 475 and the regulations thereunder govern.
(iv) Transactions within section 988. To the extent that the rules provided in this section are inconsistent with the rules that apply to any notional principal contract that is also a section 988 transaction or that is integrated with other property or debt pursuant to section 988(d), the rules of section 988 and the regulations thereunder govern.
(2) Specified index. A specified index is—
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-3(d)Taxable year of inclusion and deduction.
Taxable year of inclusion and deduction. For all purposes of the Code, the net income or net deduction from a notional principal contract for a taxable year is included in or deducted from gross income for that taxable year. The net income or net deduction from a notional principal contract for a taxable year equals the total of all of the periodic payments that are recognized from that contract for the taxable year under paragraph (e) of this section and all of the nonperiodic payments that are recognized from that contract for the taxable year under paragraph (f) of this section.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.446-3(e)Periodic payments—(1) Definition.
Periodic payments—(1) Definition. Periodic payments are payments made or received pursuant to a notional principal contract that are payable at intervals of one year or less during the entire term of the contract (including any extension periods provided for in the contract), that are based on a specified index described in paragraph (c)(2)(i), (iii), or (iv) of this section (appropriately adjusted for the length of the interval), and that are based on either a single notional principal amount or a notional principal amount that varies over the term of the contract in the same proportion as the notional principal amount that measures the other party's payments. Payments to purchase or sell a cap or a floor, however, are not periodic payments.
(2) Recognition rules—(i) In general. All taxpayers, regardless of their method of accounting, must recognize the ratable daily portion of a periodic payment for the taxable year to which that portion relates.
(ii) Rate set in arrears. If the amount of a periodic payment is not determinable at the end of a taxable year because the value of the specified index is not fixed until a date that occurs after the end of the taxable year, the ratable daily portion of a periodic payment that relates to that taxable year is generally based on the specified index that would have applied if the specified index were fixed as of the last day of the taxable year. If a taxpayer determines that the value of the specified index as of the last day of the taxable year does not provide a reasonable estimate of the specified index that will apply when the payment is fixed, the taxpayer may use a reasonable estimate of the specified index each year, provided that the taxpayer (and any related person that is a party to the contract) uses the same method to make the estimate consistently from year to year and uses the same estimate for purposes of all financial reports to equity holders and creditors. The taxpayer's treatment of notional principal contracts with substantially similar specified indices will be considered in determining whether the taxpayer's estimate of the specified index is reasonable. Any difference between the amount that is recognized under this paragraph (e)(2)(ii) and the corresponding portion of the actual payment that becomes fixed under the contract is taken into account as an adjustment to the net income or net deduction from the notional principal contract for the taxable year during which the payment becomes fixed.
(iii) Notional principal amount set in arrears. Rules similar to the rules of paragraph (e)(2)(ii) of this section apply if the amount of a periodic payment is not determinable at the end of a taxable year because the notional principal amount is not fixed until a date that occurs after the end of the taxable year.
(3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of paragraph (e) of this section.
307 Citing Cases
Accrual method taxpayers like Norwich recognize taxable income when all events fixing the right to receive income have occurred and the amount can be determined with reasonable accuracy. See I.R.C. § 451(b). The claim of right doctrine provides an interesting twist to determining when the receipt of funds constitutes taxable income a
Section 446 expressly authorizes the Commissioner to reconstruct a taxpayer’s income if the method the taxpayer employs doesn’t clearly reflect income. § 446(b). He has great latitude in doing so—especially when a taxpayer fails to keep adequate books and records—and his reconstruction need only to be reasonable in light of all surrounding facts an
● If respondent’s position on one or both of the foregoing questions is sustained, whether the Commissioner’s action constitutes a change to GWA’s method of accounting to clearly reflect income under section 446, requiring one or more section 481 adjustments to prevent amounts from being duplicated or omitted.
§ 1.446-1(c)(1)(i). 27 [ *27] B. Qualified Research To constitute qualified research, the research must satisfy a four- part statutory test: Sec. 41(d). Qualified research defined. . . . (1) In general.—The term “qualified research” means research— (A) with respect to which expenditures may be treated as expenses under section 1
For the reasons discussed below, we hold that respondent’s calculation of the deficiency is supported by substantive evidence.
We find the Fifth Circuit case to be distinguishable from the case at hand, however.
ner’s reliance on the economic performance requirement of section 461(h) is misplaced. Section 461 provides general rules with respect to the proper year for taking deductions, which in turn rest in part on the taxpayer’s method of accounting under section 446. An accrual method taxpayer is generally entitled to deduct expenses for the years in which the taxpayer 9 The sale provision provides: If, in connection with the sale or exchange of a trade or business by a taxpayer, the purchaser express
We distinguished the earlier and later versions of the contract. We held that Angelus did not recognize any income under the first version of its contract because it was a true trustee and had no rights to the money. Id. at 395. But we also held that Angelus did recognize income upon receipt under the second version because it didn’t impose any restraint or limitations on Angelus’s ability to use the funds. Id. at 398. This made it look like an advance-payment case. Id. at 399 (citing Schlude; A
Section 446 Section 446 provides the general rule for accounting methods.
accounting method “clearly reflect[s] income,” a concept the Code does not define, and therefore whether a taxpayer may use that method to compute taxable income.14 See Commissioner v. Hansen, 360 U.S. 446, 467 (1959) (discussing the predecessor of section 446). The IRS abused this discretion by denying a taxpayer the use of an accounting method permitted by Rev. Proc. 71-21, 1971-2 C.B. 549, even though the taxpayer qualified to use the method by the terms of the revenue procedure itself. Barn
522, 532 (1979) (“[I]t is obvious that on their face, §§446 and 471, with their accompanying Regulations, vest the Commissioner with wide discretion in determining whether a particular method of inventory accounting should be disallowed as not clearly reflective of income.”); Commissioner v.
422, 440 (1926); see also Trinity Indus., Inc.
422, 440 (1926); see also Trinity Indus., Inc.
422, 440 (1926); see also Trinity Indus., Inc.
522, 532 (1979) (“[I]t is obvious that on their face, §§446 and 471, with their accompanying Regulations, vest the Commissioner with wide discretion in determining whether a particular method of inventory accounting should be disallowed as not clearly reflective of income.”); Commissioner v.
(1) Richmond is entitled to additional costs ofgoods sold (COGS) or deductions for business expenses other than those respondent allowed; (2) Richmond was a reseller or a producer ofmarijuana pursuant to section 471 during the years in issue; (3) Richmond is allowed to change its accounting method pursuant to section 446 for tax year 2015; and (4) Richmond is liable for accuracy-related penalties pursuant to section 6662(a).
- 16 - Section 1.446-1(a)(4)(i), Income Tax Regs., provides that a taxpayerwho is involved in the production, purchase, or sale ofmerchandise must account for merchandise on hand at the beginning and end ofeach year, so as to compute properly taxable income for each year.
- 16 - Section 1.446-1(a)(4)(i), Income Tax Regs., provides that a taxpayerwho is involved in the production, purchase, or sale ofmerchandise must account for merchandise on hand at the beginning and end ofeach year, so as to compute properly taxable income for each year.
Section 481 was designed "to complement section 446." German, 65 T.C.M.
Furthermore, we do not agree with the characterization ofJFLP's method as a hybrid method, a position petitioners assert for the first time in their briefs.
ax Regs., convinces us that respondent was correct to adjust the method the Project Man used.3 The more difficult question is whether respondent's change requires the application of section 481. 3Any combination ofthe methods ofaccounting set out in sec. 446 is permitted in connection with a trade or business ifthe combination clearly reflects income and is consistently used. Sec. 1.446-1(c)(1)(iv)(a), Income Tax Regs. Here, use ofthe cash method in computing gross income from a trade or busines
446; Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. at 686-687. The reconstruction need only be reasonable. Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. at 687. One established method of reconstructing a taxpayer's income when the taxpayer has inadequate records and large bank deposits is the bank deposits method. M DiLeo v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. at 867; Estate ofMas
446; Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 661, 686-687 (1989). The reconstruction need only be reasonable. Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. at 687. One established method ofreconstructing a taxpayer's income when the taxpayer has inadequate records and large bank deposits is the bank deposits method. See DiLeo v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. at 867. Ba
ax Regs., convinces us that respondent was correct to adjust the method the Project Man used.3 The more difficult question is whether respondent's change requires the application of section 481. 3Any combination ofthe methods ofaccounting set out in sec. 446 is permitted in connection with a trade or business ifthe combination clearly reflects income and is consistently used. Sec. 1.446-1(c)(1)(iv)(a), Income Tax Regs. Here, use ofthe cash method in computing gross income from a trade or busines
The Commissioner has broad powers under section 446 to compute the taxable income ofa taxpayer.
e full income was not recognized in those prior years. Respond- ent's adjustments to the entities' returns are shown below in the following tables: S. I. Securities Ordinary income adjustments Adjustment 2007 2008 Sec. 481(a) adjustment $532,746 --- Sec. 446 currentyear adjustment 188,786 $28,694 Gross receipts (reclassified capital gains) 150,151 54,377 Contract for deed default expenses ¹ (48,998) (40,870) Total 822,685 42,201 ¹Petitioners have not challenged respondent's determination with re
e full income was not recognized in those prior years. Respond- ent's adjustments to the entities' returns are shown below in the following tables: S. I. Securities Ordinary income adjustments Adjustment 2007 2008 Sec. 481(a) adjustment $532,746 --- Sec. 446 currentyear adjustment 188,786 $28,694 Gross receipts (reclassified capital gains) 150,151 54,377 Contract for deed default expenses ¹ (48,998) (40,870) Total 822,685 42,201 ¹Petitioners have not challenged respondent's determination with re
When a taxpayer fails to keep adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized by section 446 to reconstructthe taxpayer's income using any reasonable method.
97-37, supra, had been superseded by Rev.
e full income was not recognized in those prior years. Respond- ent's adjustments to the entities' returns are shown below in the following tables: S. I. Securities Ordinary income adjustments Adjustment 2007 2008 Sec. 481(a) adjustment $532,746 --- Sec. 446 currentyear adjustment 188,786 $28,694 Gross receipts (reclassified capital gains) 150,151 54,377 Contract for deed default expenses ¹ (48,998) (40,870) Total 822,685 42,201 ¹Petitioners have not challenged respondent's determination with re
446; Meneguzzo v. Commissioner, 43 T.C. at 831. The Commissioner has great latitude in adopting a suitable method for reconstructingthe taxpayer's income. Giddio v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 1530, 1533 (1970). The amount ofincome determined by the Commissioner need not be exact so long as it is based on a reasonable methodology in the light ofall
446; Meneguzzo v. Commissioner, 43 T.C. 824, 831 (1965); see also Miller v. Commissioner, 237 F.2d 830, 838 (5th Cir. 1956), aff'g in part, rev'g in part T.C. Memo. 1955-112. The reconstruction need only be reasonable in the light ofall surrounding facts -7- [*7] and circumstances. Giddio v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 1530, 1533 (1970); Schroeder
- 9 - [*9] Notice ofDeficiency The notice ofdeficiency stated that the IRS had made a section 446 adjustment of$902,851 and a section 481 adjustment of$2,740,161 to HFM's 2005 tax return.
Mingo's partnership proceeds attributable to unrealized receivables as an installment sale, petitioners' reporting ofthat sale constituted the election ofan accounting method under section 446 such that section 481(a) applies; (3) additionally, ifsection 481(a) applies, whether petitioners must recognize ordinary income of$126,240 under section 481(a) for tax year 2003 as a result ofrespondent's change oftheir accounting method with respect to the sale; 1Unless otherwise indicated, section refer
Frontier used the same accounting method for tax that it used for financial (book) accounting. In 2005 Frontier capitalized direct material and labor costs and post-production-period carrying costs, but it claimed deductions for salaries, yearend bonuses, and other miscellaneous expenses. Frontier requests this Court to sustain its origin
ferences are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules ofPractice and Procedure. 2Respondent concedes that alternative argument set forth in the notice of deficiency under sec. 446. windows. Petitioner handles sales and research and development for Zeluck, Inc. Petitioner and Kevin Zeluck often invest in similar ventures together. PW & F-W-01 Drilling Co. (PW Partnership) was formed August 1, 2001, purportedly for the
Where a taxpayer's method of accounting does not clearly reflect lncome, section 446 (b) authorizes the Commissioner to compute taxable income under a method which, in his opinion, clearly reflects income.
Where a taxpayer fails to keep the required books and records, or if the records the taxpayer maintains do not clearly reflect income, the Commissioner is authorized by section 446 to reconstruct the taxpayer's income in accordance with a method that clearly reflects the full amount of income äreceived.
446(h); Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 661, 693 (1989). The Commissioner may use indirect methods, and he is given latitude in determining which method of reconstruction to apply. Petzoldt v. Commissioner, supra at 693. The Commissioner's reconstruction of a taxpay r's income need only be reasonable in the light of all surrou ding facts and
Was the IRS' s determination that section 446 required Penco to use the accrual method of accou ting an abuse of discretion?
actment of section 448, taxpayers whose businesses did not involve inventories generally could elect to use any method of accounting that clearly reflected income and that was regularly used in keeping the taxpayer's(cid:127)books and records under section 446 . Congress enacted section 448(a) because it believed "that the cash method 15 - of accounting frequently fails to reflect accurately the economic results of a taxpayers's trade or business over a taxable year ." H . Rept . 99-426, at 605
The Commissioner may use any of several methods to reconstruct a taxpayer' s taxable income ; and when a taxpayer fails to keep adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized by section 446 to determine the existence and amount of the taxpayer's income by any method that clearly reflects income .
re the enactment of section 448, taxpayers whose businesses did not involve inventories generally could elect to use any method of accounting that clearly reflected income and that was regularly used in keeping the taxpayer’s books and records under section 446. Congress enacted section 448(a) because it believed “that the cash method of accounting frequently fails to reflect accurately the economic results of a taxpayers’s trade or business over a taxable year.” H. Rept. 99-426, at 605 (1985),
- 263 they "have been prejudiced as they have been denied the opportunity to present any evidence regarding whether §446 applies to the treatment of tobacco tax refunds .
Section 446 provides in part : SEC .
In general section 446 and the regulations thereunder govern the timing and computation of income, deduction, and loss with respect to a notional principal contract that is a section 988 transaction .
In general section 446 and the regulations thereunder govern the timing and computation of income, deduction, and loss with respect to a notional principal contract that is a section 988 transaction.
Section 446 provides in part: SEC. 446. GENERAL RULE FOR METHODS OF ACCOUNTING. (a) General Rule. — Taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books. (b) Exceptions. — If no method of accounting has been regularly used by the taxpayer, or if the met
Examples of actions in which we conduct a trial de novo include those where we must decide whether it was an abuse of discretion for the Commissioner to (1) determine that a taxpayer's method of accounting did not clearly reflect income under section 446, e .g ., Thor Power Tool Co .
Marlin When a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate book s and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method that clearly reflects .income .
The regulations promulgated under section 446 state : "The term `method of accounting' includes not only the over-all method of accounting of the taxpayer but also the accounting treatment of any item ." Sec .
are treated as materials and supplies that are not incidental are considered consumed and used in the year in which the taxpayer sells the merchandise or finished goods. See Rev. 15The IRS will not challenge a taxpayer’s use of the cash method under sec. 446, or a taxpayer’s failure to account for inventories under sec. 471, in a tax year ending before Dec. 17, 1999, if the taxpayer would satisfy the 3-tax-year-period gross receipts test of Rev. Proc. 2001-10, sec. 5.01, 2001-1 C.B. 272, 273. Id
Examples of actions in which we conduct a trial de novo include those where we must decide whether it was an abuse of discretion for the Commissioner to (1) determine that a taxpayer’s method of accounting did not clearly reflect income under section 446, e.g., Thor Power Tool Co.
The regulations promulgated under section 446 state: “The term ‘method of accounting’ includes not only the over-all method of accounting of the taxpayer but also the accounting treatment of any item.” Sec.
The Commissioner’s Use of the Bank Deposits Method of Income Reconstruction Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer’s taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner’s opinion, clearly reflects income.
When a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which clearly reflects income .
The Commissioner’s Use of the Bank Deposits Method of Income Reconstruction Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer’s taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner’s opinion, clearly reflects income.
The Commissioner has broad powers under section 446~to compute the taxable income of a taxpayer .
The Commissioner’s Use of the Bank Deposits Method of Income Reconstruction Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer’s taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner’s opinion, clearly reflects income.
The Commissioner’s Use of the Bank Deposits Method of Income Reconstruction Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer’s taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner’s opinion, clearly reflects income.
The Commissioner’s Use of the Bank Deposits Method of Income Reconstruction Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer’s taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner’s opinion, clearly reflects income.
If taxpayers fail to maintain or do not produce adequate books and records, respondent is authorized by section 446 to reconstruct the taxpayers’ income.
Section 446 Section 446 prescribes certain rules with respect to methods of accounting: A taxpayer computes its taxable income in accordance with its method of accounting, see sec. 446(a), and has some discretion in choosing a permissible method of accounting, see sec. 446(c). Nevertheless, no method of accounting is acceptable unless, in the opini
Bank Deposits Method for Computing Taxable Income The IRS has broad powers under section 446 to compute the taxable income of a taxpayer.
Section 446 Section 446 prescribes certain rules with respect to methods of accounting: A taxpayer computes its taxable income in accordance with its method of accounting, see sec. 446(a), and has some discretion in choosing a permissible method of accounting, see sec. 446(c). Nevertheless, no method of accounting is acceptable unless, in the opini
When a taxpayer fails to keep the required books and records, section 446 authorizes the Commissioner to “reconstruct income in accordance with a method which clearly reflects the full amount of income received.” Petzoldt v.
ly 31, 1994 (1994), July 31, 1995 (1995), and July 31, 1996 (1996) (collectively, years in issue); and (2) whether respondent abused his discretion in determining that Qwest’s incremental cost allocation method failed to clearly reflect income under section 446.2 1 Petitioners agree to: (1) Decrease the cost of sales for costs allocated to conduits sold to Metropolitan Fiber Systems (MFS) in the MFS Dallas and MFS Los Angeles projects by $915,870 and $635,317, respectively, and increase the basi
Section 446 Section 446 prescribes certain rules with respect to methods of accounting: A taxpayer computes its taxable income in accordance with its method of accounting, see sec. 446(a), and has some discretion in choosing a permissible method of accounting, see sec. 446(c). Nevertheless, no method of accounting is acceptable unless, in the opini
er, without further explanation or support, what would seem to be a novel legal theory. Section 461 provides general rules with respect to the proper year for taking deductions, which in turn rest in part on the taxpayer’s method of accounting under section 446. An accrual method taxpayer, such as KareMor and Mayor in these cases, is typically entitled to a deduction “in the taxable year in which all the events have occurred that establish the fact of the liability, the amount of the liability c
If the taxpayer does not, the Commissioner is authorized by section 446 to reconstruct the taxpayer’s income.
Examples of actions in which we conduct a trial de novo are whether it was an abuse of discretion for the Commissioner to (1) determine that a taxpayer’s method of accounting did not clearly reflect income under section 446, e.g., Thor Power Tool Co.
tandard may be the subject of a trial de novo does not necessarily mean that we are free to substitute our judgment for that of the Commissioner in such cases. See, e.g., Capitol Fed. Sav. & Loan Association v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. 204, 209 (1991) (sec. 446); Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 525 (1989), affd. 933 F.2d 1084 (2d Cir. 1991) (sec. 482). Separately, the majority cites two Memorandum Opinions of this Court in support of the proposition that "[t]he Court has (continued...)
Commissioner, 94 T.C. 654, 658 (1990); Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 661, 687 (1989). The reconstruction need only be reasonable in light of - 6 - all surrounding facts and circumstances. See Giddio v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 1530, 1533 (1970); Schroeder v. Commissioner, 40 T.C. 30, 33 (1963). Respondent determined that petiti
Under section 446,7 the 7 Sec. 446 provides in pertinent part: SEC. 446(a). General Rule.--Taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books. (b) Exceptions.--If no method of accounting has been regularly used by the taxpayer, or if the method used does no
Examples of actions in which we conduct a trial de novo are whether it was an abuse of discretion for the Commissioner to (1) determine that a taxpayer’s method of accounting did not clearly reflect income under section 446, e.g., Thor Power Tool Co.
We hold that neither FNBC’s method of accounting as to its swaps income nor respondent’s method of accounting as to that income clearly reflected FNBC’s swaps income.
rly reflect income, the computation of taxable income shall be made under such method as, in the opinion of the Secretary, does clearly reflect income.” In general, the accrual method is designated a permissible method of accounting for purposes of section 446. Sec. 446(c)(2). Under the accrual method, income is to be included for the taxable year when all events have occurred that fix the right to receive the income and the amount of the income can be determined with reasonable accuracy. Secs.
Section 446 provides generally that taxpayers are to compute taxable income using the method of accounting that they use in computing income for book purposes, unless such method does not clearly reflect income. Under section 446(c), the accrual method is a permissible method of accounting. Sec. 446(c)(2). Specifically, under the accrual method of
Section 446 provides: SEC. 446. GENERAL RULE FOR METHODS OF ACCOUNTING. (a) General Rule.–-Taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books. (b) Exceptions.–-If no method of accounting has been regularly used by the taxpayer, or if the method used d
Section 446 provides: SEC. 446. GENERAL RULE FOR METHODS OF ACCOUNTING. (a) General Rule.–-Taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books. (b) Exceptions.–-If no method of accounting has been regularly used by the taxpayer, or if the method used d
We stated: Under all the circumstances herein, we hold that petitioner has satisfied its heavy burden and has convinced us that it employed a generally accepted method of accounting which ‘clearly reflects its income.’ In so doing, we neither hold nor imply that, under all circumstances, a taxpayer has a right to choose between alternative generally ac
The sole issue for decision is whether - 2 - it was an abuse of respondent’s discretion, under section 446, to require petitioner to change from the cash method of accounting to the accrual method of accounting in order to reflect clearly the income of petitioner’s oil and gas business.
ess nor required for the effective discharge of respondent’s revenue-collecting responsibilities. Accordingly, we turn to a determination as to whether petitioner’s method of accounting ‘clearly reflects - 94 - income’ pursuant to the provisions of section 446. * * * Id. at 283–284. In Fort Howard Paper Co., we found the taxpayer’s method of accounting clearly to reflect income notwithstanding that the taxpayer allocated no overhead to self-constructed property under the “incremental cost” metho
ess nor required for the effective discharge of respondent’s revenue-collecting responsibilities. Accordingly, we turn to a determination as to whether petitioner’s method of accounting ‘clearly reflects - 94 - income’ pursuant to the provisions of section 446. * * * Id. at 283–284. In Fort Howard Paper Co., we found the taxpayer’s method of accounting clearly to reflect income notwithstanding that the taxpayer allocated no overhead to self-constructed property under the “incremental cost” metho
Section 263 and Section 446 In general, amounts paid to acquire machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and similar property having a useful life 2 Respondent allowed depreciation for the disputed assets of $72,802 for 1995 and $178,819 for 1996.
ses the cash method of accounting, entitlement to a section 162(a) deduction presupposes that the taxpayer can substantiate by sufficient records that the underlying expense has been paid. Sec. 6001; sec. 1.6001-1(a), (e), Income Tax Regs.; see also sec. 446; sec. 5 E.g., according to the notice of deficiency, the gain realized from the sale of the condominium is includable in petitioner’s 1993 income because he has “not established the requirements of section 121 or section 1034 * * * have been
(Diehl), petitioned the Court to redetermine respondent's determination of a $142,986 deficiency in its Federal income tax BERVED OCT 2 9 2001 - 2 - for its taxable year ended May 31, 1995 (1995 taxable year).¹ We must decide whether respondent abused his discretion under section 446 when he determined that Diehl must change its overall method of accounting from a hybrid method to an accrual method.
In addition, regulations promulgated under section 446 further clarify the operation of these statutory mandates: Requirement respecting the adoption or change of accounting method.
1997-240, is in error, and, accordingly, the majority’s reliance upon it is unfounded; and (5) this case is factually distinguishable from Osteopathic Med. Oncology & Hematology, P.C. v. Commissioner, 113 T.C. 376 (1999). The majority sets forth the correct standards for determining whether respondent has abused his discretion. Those standards are summarized here to emphasize that petitioner has failed to meet the standard expressed by the majority: The Commissioner has broad authority to decide
1.446-1(e)(2)(ii)(a), Income Tax Regs. A material item is defined as "any item which involves the proper time for the inclusion of the item in income or the taking of a deduction." Sec. 1.446-1(e)(2)(ii)(a), Income Tax Regs. When an accounting practice does nothing more than postpone the reporting of income, rather than permanently avoiding the reporting of income over the taxpayer's lifetime, it involves the proper time for reporting income. See Wayne Bolt & Nut Co. v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. 500
As used in section 446, the term “method of accounting” encompasses “not only the over-all method of accounting of the taxpayer but also the accounting treatment of any item”.
Accordingly, we hold that petitioner's attempted recharacterization of the expenditures in - 36 - issue is an impermissible change in methocl.
r without regard to actual receipt. The method sought by respondent, petitioners The parties do not dispute that the timing of petitioners' deductions for the amounts paid to Western General constitutes a "method of accounting" within the meaning of sec. 446. See sec. 1.446-1(a)(1), Income Tax Regs. ("The term 'method of accounting' includes not only the over-all method of accounting of the taxpayer but also the accounting treatment of any item."). - 17 - contend, distorts income because it limi
446; Don Casey Co. v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 847, 862 (1986). Before our decision in Osteopathic Med. Oncology & Hematology, P.C., Wilkinson-Beane, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra, and its progeny provided at least a colorable factual and legal basis for the Commissioner’s conclusion that drugs used in treating patients constituted merchandise, the
without regard to actual receipt. The method sought by respondent, petitioners ' The parties do not dispute that the timing of petitioners' deductions for the amounts paid to Western General constitutes a "method of accounting" within the meaning of sec. 446. See sec. 1.446-1(a)(1), Income Tax Regs. ("The term 'method of accounting' includes not only the over-all method of accounting of the taxpayer but also the accounting treatment of any item."). - 17 - contend, distorts income because it limi
446; Don Casey Co. v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 847, 862 (1986). Before our decision in Osteopathic Med. Oncology & Hematology, P.C., Wilkinson-Beane, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra, and its progeny provided at least a colorable factual and legal basis for the Commissioner’s conclusion that drugs used in treating patients constituted merchandise, the
- 7 - Under section 446,6 the Commissioner has broad powers to determine whether an accounting method used by a taxpayer clearly reflects income.
Section 446 imposes a heavy burden on a taxpayer disputing the Commissioner’s determination on accounting matters. See Thor Power Tool Co. v. Commissioner, 439 U.S. 522, 532-533 (1979). We review the Commissioner’s exercise of authority under section 446(b) for abuse of discretion. See Ford Motor Co. v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 87, 91 (1994), affd. 7
without regard to actual receipt. The method sought by respondent, petitioners S The parties do not dispute that the timing of petitioners' deductions for the amounts paid to Western General constitutes a "method of accounting" within the meaning of sec. 446. See sec. 1.446-1(a)(1), Income Tax Regs. ("The term 'method of accounting' includes not only the over-all method of accounting of the taxpayer but also the accounting treatment of any item."). - 17 - contend, distorts income because it limi
r without regard to actual receipt. The method sought by respondent, petitioners The parties do not dispute that the timing of petitioners' deductions for the amounts paid to Western General constitutes a "method of accounting" within the meaning of sec. 446. See sec. 1.446-1(a)(1), Income Tax Regs. ("The term 'method of accounting' includes not only the over-all method of accounting of the taxpayer but also the accounting treatment of any item."). - 17 - contend, distorts income because it limi
As used in section 446, the térm “method of accounting” encompasses “not only the over-all method of accounting of the taxpayer but also the accounting treatment of any item”.
We decide this issue in the context of whether it was an abuse of respondent’s discretion to exercise his authority under section 446 to require petitioner to change from the cash method to the accrual method.
1992-236, this Court held that, for purposes of section 446, a question of whether collections should be reported in income is different from a question as to the proper time when collections should be reported in income.
446 provides in pertinent part: SEC.
The issues presented implicate not only section 472, enti- tled "Last-In, First-Out Inventories", but also section 446, entitled "General Rule for Methods of Accounting", and section 471, entitled "General Rule for Inventories".
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
Furthermore, section 446 controls the determination of the method of accounting.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
Section 703(a) provides that with exceptions "The taxable income of a partnership shall be computed in the same manner as in the case of an individual".
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
When a taxpayer fails to keep adequate books and records, respondent is authorized by section 446 to reconstruct the taxpayer’s income using any reasonable method.
er asserts that, although the costs are expensed ratably over 2 years for purposes of financial records and deducted currently, in 1 year, for tax purposes, the method of tax accounting used clearly reflects petitioner’s income within the meaning of section 446. - 5 - Thus, any attempt by respondent to require a change in this tax accounting method constitutes, in petitioner’s view, an abuse of discretion. Conversely, respondent contends that, since a greater percentage of the costs at issue is
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
axpayer] should be required to use the inventory method for tax purposes." J.P. Sheahan Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-239. Accordingly, we turn to the applicable Code provision and case law dealing with this matter. We begin with section 446. That section provides in pertinent part as follows: SEC. 446(a). General Rule.--Taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books. (b) Ex
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
axpayer] should be required to use the inventory method for tax purposes." J.P. Sheahan Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-239. Accordingly, we turn to the applicable Code provision and case law dealing with this matter. We begin with section 446. That section provides in pertinent part as follows: SEC. 446(a). General Rule.--Taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books. (b) Ex
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
OPINION Where a taxpayer fails to maintain or produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized under section 446 to compute the taxpayer's taxable income by any method which, in the Commissioner's opinion, clearly reflects income.
learly reflects income.5 Sec. 446(b); United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 503 (1943); Burka v. Commissioner, 179 F.2d 483 (4th Cir. 1950). Petitioners bear the burden to prove that respondent's method does not clearly reflect income. Rule 142(a); see sec. 446. The indirect method used to calculate income must be reasonable. See, e.g., Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121 (1954). The percentage markup method is well recognized as a reasonable means of reconstructing income, see Bollella v. Commi
er asserts that, although the costs are expensed ratably over 2 years for purposes of financial records and deducted currently, in 1 year, for tax purposes, the method of tax accounting used clearly reflects petitioner’s income within the meaning of section 446. Thus, any attempt by respondent to require a change in this tax accounting method constitutes, in petitioner’s view, an abuse of discretion. Conversely, respondent contends that, since a greater percentage of the costs at issue is alloca
We decide this issue in the context of whether it was an abuse of respondent’s discretion to exercise his authority under section 446 and require petitioner to change from the cash method to a hybrid method.
OPINION The issues presented implicate not only section 472, entitled “Last-In, First-Out Inventories”, but also section 446, entitled “General Rule for Methods of Accounting”, and section 471, entitled “General Rule for Inventories”.
(Emphasis added.) For purposes of section 446, however, the “taxpayer” is the partnership.
* * * Section 1.1502-17, Income Tax Regs., entitled “Methods of accounting”, stated that “The method of accounting to be used by each member of the group shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of section 446 as if such member filed a separate return.” Section 446(a) stated that “Taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books.” Section 1.446-l(a)(l), Income Tax Regs., further prov
o doing, have been acting in 37 accordance with established industry practice that has been in effect for decades, respondent's characterization of these costs as capital expenditures would amount to a change in its accounting "methods" contrary to section 446. Section 446(a) permits a taxpayer to compute taxable income "under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books." A taxpayer's "method of accounting" includes not only the
893 (1954). Under the percentage markup method, gross receipts are determined by adding a percentage to the cost of goods sold. The burden of proof is on petitioners to show that respondent's method does not clearly reflect income. Rule 142(a); see sec. 446. Since petitioners did not keep books to show gross receipts from sales, it was permissible for respondent to apply a markup percentage to determine their gross receipts for 1992 and 1993. In 1992, on their Schedule C, petitioners claimed su
* * * (3) Exceptions.--Where property is substantially vested upon transfer, the deduction shall be allowed to such person in accordance with his method of accounting (in conformity with section 446 and 461).
Section 446 provides in pertinent part: (a) General Rule.--Taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books.
446; Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 661, 686-687 (1989). The cash method is designed to reconstruct the income of a taxpayer who consumes his income during the year and does not invest it. Id. at 694. It 4 This method has been referred to by both names. See DeVenney v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 927, 930 (1985). - 14 - is based on the assumptio
If a taxpayer fails to maintain or does not produce adequate books and records, the Commissioner is authorized by section 446 to reconstruct the taxpayer's income.
Petitioners contend that section 446 requires the Commissioner to make an express finding that the method of accounting used by the taxpayer does not clearly reflect income.
1038, 1046-1047 (11th Cir. 1992), affg. 95 T.C. 525 (1990) (taxpayer who lacked control of the management and operations and had limited liability for cattle-feeding losses, and did not work on feedlot, hire or fire employees was not a farmer under sec. 446); compare Hi-Plains Enters., Inc. v. Commissioner, 496 F.2d 520, 523 (10th Cir. 1974), affg. 60 T.C. 158 (1973), in which the - 16 - Court of Appeals indicated that a grain elevator or feed store that sells grain or feed to farmers, and that
446; Meneguzzo v. - 7 - Commissioner, 43 T.C. 824, 831 (1965).2 Petitioner argues that the notices of deficiency in this case were arbitrary and erroneous, in which case they would not be entitled to the presumption of correctness ordinarily accorded to deficiency notices. Pittman v. Commissioner, 100 F.3d 1308, 1317 (7th Cir. 1996), affg. T.
Given respondent's broad authority pursuant to section 446, the paucity of information that petitioners maintained with respect to cost of goods sold, and the fact that petitioners did not have a valid method of accounting for reporting inventories, we reject petitioners' contention.
o doing, have been acting in 37 accordance with established industry practice that has been in effect for decades, respondent's characterization of these costs as capital expenditures would amount to a change in its accounting "methods" contrary to section 446. Section 446(a) permits a taxpayer to compute taxable income "under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books." A taxpayer's "method of accounting" includes not only the
Section 446 provides in pertinent part: (a) General Rule. — Taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books. (b) Exceptions. — If no method of accounting has been regularly used by the taxpayer, or if the method used does not clearly reflect income
Where property is substantially vested upon transfer, the deduction shall be allowed to such person in accordance with his method of accounting (in conformity with section 446 and 461).
Pursuant to section 446,4 the Commissioner has broad powers to determine whether an accounting method used by a taxpayer clearly reflects income.
Commissioner, 92 T.C. 661, 686-687 (1989); Harbin v. Commissioner, 40 T.C. 373, 376 (1963). This Court has approved the Commissioner's use of the source and application of funds method to reconstruct income. Vassallo v. Commissioner, 23 T.C. 656, 661-662 (1955). This method is based on the assumption that the amount by which th
Section 446 imposes a heavy burden on the taxpayer disputing the Commissioner's determination on accounting matters. Thor Power Tool Co. v. Commissioner, 439 U.S. 522, 532-533 (1979). To prevail, a taxpayer must establish that respondent's determination is "clearly unlawful" or "plainly arbitrary". Id. However, if the taxpayer's method of accountin
The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has stated: - 23 - § 446 gives the Commissioner discretion with respect to two determinations.
respondent's discretion to require petitioner to change from the cash method of accounting to the accrual method of accounting.3 Subsumed in this issue is the question of whether petitioner should be required to use inventories for tax purposes.4 3 Sec. 446 provides in pertinent part: SEC. 446(a). General Rule.--Taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in keeping his books. (b) Exceptions.--If no method of ac
That court has said: § 446 gives the Commissioner discretion with respect to two determinations.
501, to implement an administrative decision, made by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the exercise of his discretion under section 446 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, to allow accrual method taxpayers in certain specified and limited circumstances to defer - 18 - the inclusion in gross income for Federal income tax purposes of payments received (or amounts due and payable) in one taxable year for services to be performed by the end of the next succeeding taxable
446; Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121, 130-132 (1954). The bank deposits method has long been approved by the courts as a method for computing income. Estate of Mason v. Commissioner, supra at 656. Bank deposits are prima facie evidence of income. 7 Tokarski v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 74, 77 (1986); Estate of Mason v. Commissioner, supra
Purpose The purpose of this Revenue Procedure is to implement an administrative decision, made by the Commissioner in the exercise of his discretion under - 14 - section 446 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, to allow accrual method taxpayers in certain specified and limited circumstances to defer the inclusion in gross income for Federal income tax purposes of payments received (or amounts due and payable) in one taxable year for services to be performed by the end of the next succeeding tax
Petitioner next argues that, even if the units used in the computation are "items" for section 446 purposes, the change from body size to model line was not a change in item for section 446(e) purposes, as such change was a permissible refinement or delineation of Investments’ existing item definition.
ion or use of medical supplies. For psychiatric - 39 - hospitals, ancillary services include group and individual therapy. OPINION Section 446(a)16 requires a taxpayer to compute taxable income under the method of accounting it regularly uses in 16 Sec. 446 provides in pertinent part as follows: SEC. 446. GENERAL RULE FOR METHODS OF ACCOUNTING. (a) General Rule.--Taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in ke
We consider section 446 in deciding this issue.
If a taxpayer fails to keep the required books and records, or if the books and records maintained do not clearly reflect income, respondent is authorized by section 446 to reconstruct income in accordance with a method that clearly reflects the full amount of income received, Petzoldt v.
ion or use of medical supplies. For psychiatric - 39 - hospitals, ancillary services include group and individual therapy. OPINION Section 446(a)16 requires a taxpayer to compute taxable income under the method of accounting it regularly uses in 16 Sec. 446 provides in pertinent part as follows: SEC. 446. GENERAL RULE FOR METHODS OF ACCOUNTING. (a) General Rule.--Taxable income shall be computed under the method of accounting on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his income in ke
Under this method, an expense is deductible when all events have occurred to establish the fact of liability, the amount can be determined with reasonable accuracy, and economic performance has occurred. Sec. 461(h)(1), (4); United States v. General Dynamics Corp., 481 U.S. 239, 243 (1987) - 26 - (accrual method taxpayer may not deduct a
"An action taken by the Commissioner under section 446 will be set aside by the courts only if there is a clear abuse of discretion." Cole v.
501, to implement an administrative decision, made by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the exercise of his discretion under section 446 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, to allow accrual method taxpayers in certain specified and limited circumstances to defer the inclusion in gross income for Federal income tax purposes of payments received (or amounts due and payable) in one taxable year for services to be performed by the end of the next succeeding taxable year.
Purpose The purpose of this Revenue Procedure is to implement an administrative decision, made by the Commissioner in the exercise of his discretion under section 446 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, to allow accrual method taxpayers in certain specified and limited circumstances to defer the inclusion in gross income for Federal income tax purposes of payments received (or amounts due and payable) in one taxable year for services to he performed by the end of the next succeeding taxable ye
Commissioner, 40 T.C. 373, 377 (1963); sec. 1.446-1(b)(1), Income Tax Regs. The Commissioner may use any reasonable method to compute the income, and no particular method is required. Campbell v. Guetersloh, 287 F.2d 878, 880 (5th Cir. 1961). The Commissioner's method need not be exact but must be reasonable. Holland v. United S
United States, 348 U.S. 121, 130-132 (1954). The bank deposits method has long been approved by the courts as a method for computing income. Estate of Mason v. Commissioner, 64 T.C. 651, 656 (1975), affd. 566 F.2d 2 (6th Cir. 1977). Bank deposits are prima facie evidence of income. Tokarski v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 74, 77 (1986