§46 — Amount of credit

242 citing cases

For purposes of section 38, the amount of the investment credit determined under this section for any taxable year shall be the sum of—

(1)

the rehabilitation credit,

(2)

the energy credit,

(3)

the qualifying advanced coal project credit,

(4)

the qualifying gasification project credit,

(5)

the qualifying advanced energy project credit,

(6)

the advanced manufacturing investment credit, and

(7)

the clean electricity investment credit.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1Determination of amount Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) Effective dates—(1) In general. This section is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1975. However, transitional rules under paragraph (g) of this section are effective for certain earlier taxable years.

    (2) Acts covered. This section reflects changes made by the following Acts of Congress:

    (3) Prior regulations. For taxable years beginning before January 1, 1976, see 26 CFR 1.46-1 (Rev. as of April 1, 1979). Those regulations do not reflect changes made by Pub. L. 89-384, Pub. L. 89-389, and Pub. L. 91-172.

    (b) General rule. The amount of investment credit (credit) allowed by section 38 for the taxable year is the portion of credit available under section 46(a)(1) that does not exceed the limitation based on tax under section 46(a)(3).

    (c) Credit available. The credit available for the taxable year is the sum of—

    (1) Unused credit carried over from prior taxable years under section 46(b) (carryovers).

    (2) Amount of credit determined under section 46(a)(2) for the taxable year (credit earned), and

    (3) Unused credit carried back from succeeding taxable years under section 46(b) (carrybacks).

    (d) Credit earned. The credit earned for the taxable year is the sum of the following percentages of qualified investment (as determined under section 46 (c) and (d))—

    (1) The regular percentage (as determined under section 46),

    (2) For energy property, the energy percentage (as determined under section 46), and

    (3) For the portion of the basis of a qualified rehabilitated building (as defined in § 1.48-12(b)) that is attributable to qualified rehabilitation expenditures (as defined in § 1.48-12(c)), the rehabilitation percentage (as determined under section 46(b)(4)).

    (e) Designation of credits. The credit available for the taxable year is designated as follows:

    (1) The credit attributable to the regular percentage is the “regular credit”.

    (2) The credit attributable to the ESOP percentage is the “ESOP credit”.

    (3) The credit attributable to the energy percentage for energy property other than solar or wind is the “nonrefundable energy credit”.

    (4) The credit attributable to the energy percentage for solar or wind energy property is the “refundable energy credit”.

    (5) The credit attributable to the rehabilitation percentage for qualified rehabilitation expenditures is the rehabilitation investment credit.

    (f) Special rules for certain energy property. Energy property is defined in section 48(l). Under section 46(a)(2)(D), energy property that is section 38 property solely by reason of section 48(l)(1) qualifies only for the energy credit. Other energy property qualifies for both the regular credit (and, if applicable, the ESOP credit) and the energy credit. For limitation on the energy percentage for property financed by industrial development bonds, see section 48(l)(11).

    (g) Transitional rule for regular and ESOP credit—(1) In general. Although section 46(a)(2) was amended by section 301(a)(1) of the Energy Tax Act of 1977 to eliminate the transitional rules under section 46(a)(2)(D), those rules still apply in certain instances. Section 46(a)(2)(D) was added by section 301(a) of the Tax Reduction Act of 1975 and amended by section 802(a) of the Tax Reform Act of 1976.

    (2) Regular credit. Under section 46(a)(2)(D), the regular credit is 10 percent and applies for the following property:

    (i) Property to which section 46 (d) does not apply, the construction, reconstruction, or erection of which is completed by the taxpayer after January 21, 1975, but only to the extent of basis attributable to construction, reconstruction, or erection after that date.

    (ii) Property to which section 46(d) does not apply, acquired by the taxpayer after January 21, 1975.

    (iii) Qualified progress expenditures (as defined in section 46(d)) made after January 21, 1975.

    (3) ESOP credit. See section 48(m) for transitional rules limiting the period for which the ESOP percentage under section 46(a)(2)(E) applies. For prior statutes, see section 46(a)(2) (B) and (D), as added by section 301 of the Tax Reduction Act of 1975 and amended by section 802 of the Tax Reform Act of 1976.

    (4) Cross reference. (i) The principles of § 1.48-2 (b) and (c) apply in determining the portion of basis attributable to construction, reconstruction, or erection after January 21, 1975, and in determining the time when property is acquired.

    (ii) Section 311 of the Revenue Act of 1978 made the 10 percent regular credit permanent.

    (5) Seven percent credit. To the extent that, under paragraph (g)(1) of this section, the 10 percent does not apply, the regular credit, in general, is 7 percent. For a special limitation on qualified investment for public utility property (other than energy property), see section 46(c)(3)(A).

    (6) Qualified progress expenditures. For progress expenditure property that is constructed, reconstructed, or erected by the taxpayer within the meaning of § 1.48-2(b), the ten-percent credit applies in the year the property is placed in service to the portion of the qualified investment that remains after reduction for qualified progress expenditures under section 46(c)(4), but only to the extent that the remaining qualified investment is attributable to construction, reconstruction, or erection after January 21, 1975. For progress expenditure property that is acquired by the taxpayer (within the meaning of § 1.48-2(b)) after January 21, 1975, and placed in service after that date, the ten-percent credit applies in the year the property is placed in service to the entire portion of qualified investment that remains after reduction for qualified progress expenditures.

    (h) Tax liability limitation—(1) In general. Section 46(a)(3) provides a tax liability limitation on the amount of credit allowed by section 38 (other than the refundable energy credit) for any taxable year. See section 46(a)(10)(C)(i). Tax liability is defined in paragraph (j) of this section. The excess of available credit over the applicable tax liability limitation for the year is an unused credit which may be carried forward or carried back under section 46(b).

    (2) Regular and ESOP tax liability limitation. In general, the tax liability limitation for the regular and ESOP credits is the portion of tax liability that does not exceed $25,000 plus a percentage of the excess, as determined under section 46(a)(3)(B).

    (3) Nonrefundable energy credit tax liability limitation. (i) For nonrefundable energy credit carrybacks to a taxable year ending before October 1, 1978, the tax liability limitation is the portion of tax liability that does not exceed $25,000 plus a percentage of the excess, as determined under section 46(a)(3)(B).

    (ii) For a taxable year ending after September 30, 1978, the tax liability limitation for available nonrefundable energy credit is 100 percent of the year's tax liability.

    (4) Alternative limitations. Alternative limitations apply for certain utilities, railroads, and airlines in determining the regular tax liability limitation and, for nonrefundable energy credit carrybacks to taxable years ending before October 1, 1978, the nonrefundable energy credit tax liability limitation. These alternative limitations do not apply in determining the energy tax liability limitation for a taxable year ending after October 1, 1978. The provisions listed below set forth the alternative limitations:

    (i) [Reserved]

    (j) Tax liability—(1) In general. “Tax liability” for purposes of the regular and ESOP credit and carrybacks of nonrefundable energy credit to a taxable year ending before October 1, 1978, means the liability for tax as defined in section 46(a)(4). For ordering of regular, ESOP, and nonrefundable energy credits, see paragraph (m) of this section. In addition to taxes excluded under section 46(a)(4), tax liability does not include tax resulting from recapture of credit under section 47 and the alternative minimum tax imposed by section 55. See sections 47(c) and 55(c)(1).

    (2) Certain nonrefundable energy credit. For a taxable year ending after September 30, 1978, “tax liability” for purposes of the nonrefundable energy credit is liability for tax, as defined in section 46(a)(4) and paragraph (j)(1) of this section, reduced by the regular and ESOP credit allowed for the taxable year. Thus, carrybacks of regular or ESOP credit to a taxable year may displace nonrefundable energy carryovers or credit earned taken into account in that year. However, carrybacks of regular, ESOP, or nonrefundable energy credit do not affect refundable energy credit which is treated as an overpayment of tax under section 6401(b). See paragraph (k) of this section.

    (k) Special rule for refundable energy credit. The amount of the refundable energy credit is determined under the rules of section 46 (other than section 46(a)(3)). However, to permit the refund, the refundable energy credit for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code (other than section 38, part IVB, and chapter 63 of the Code) is treated as allowed by section 39 and not by section 38. The refundable credit is not applied against tax liability for purposes of determining the tax liability limitation for other investment credits. Rather, it is treated as an overpayment of tax under section 6401(b).

    (l) FIFO rule. If the credit available for a taxable year is not allowed in full because of the tax liability limitation, special rules determine the order in which credits are applied. Under the first-in-first-out rule of section 46(a)(1) (FIFO), carryovers are applied against the tax liability limitation first. To the extent the tax liability limitation exceeds carryovers, credit earned, and carrybacks are then applied.

    (m) Special ordering rule—(1) In general. Under section 46(a)(10)(A), the FIFO rule applies separately—

    (i) First, with respect to regular and ESOP credits, and

    (ii) Second, with respect to nonrefundable energy credit.

    (2) Regular and ESOP credit. Under § 1.46-8(c)(9)(ii), regular and ESOP credits available are applied in the following order:

    (i) Regular carryovers;

    (ii) ESOP carryovers;

    (iii) Regular credit earned;

    (iv) ESOP credit earned;

    (v) Regular carrybacks; and

    (vi) ESOP carrybacks.

    (3) Example. For an example of the order of application of regular and ESOP credits, see § 1.46-8(c)(9)(iii).

    (n) Examples. The following examples illustrate paragraphs (a) through (m) of this section.

    (o) Married individuals. If a separate return is filed by a husband or wife, the tax liability limitation is computed by substituting a $12,500 amount for the $25,000 amount that applies under section 46(a)(3). However, this reduction of the $25,000 amount to $12,500 applies only if the taxpayer's spouse is entitled to a credit under section 38 for the taxable year of such spouse which ends with, or within, the taxpayer's taxable year. The taxpayer's spouse is entitled to a credit under section 38 either because of investment made in qualified property for such taxable year of the spouse (whether directly made by such spouse or whether apportioned to such spouse, for example, from an electing small business corporation, as defined in section 1371(b)), or because of an investment credit carryback or carryover to such taxable year. The determination of whether an individual is married shall be made under the principles of section 143 and the regulations thereunder.

    (p) Apportionment of $25,000 amount among component members of a controlled group—(1) In general. In determining the tax liability limitation under section 46(a)(3) for corporations that are component members of a controlled group on December 31, only one $25,000 amount is available to those component members for their taxable years that include that December 31. See subparagraph (2) of this paragraph for apportionment of such amount among such component members. See subparagraph (3) of this paragraph for definition of “component member”.

    (2) Manner of apportionment. (i) In the case of corporations which are component members of a controlled group on a particular December 31, the $25,000 amount may be apportioned among such members for their taxable years that include such December 31 in any manner the component members may select, provided that each such member less than 100 percent of whose stock is owned, in the aggregate, by the other component members of the group on such December 31 consents to an apportionment plan. The consent of a component member to an apportionment plan with respect to a particular December 31 shall be made by means of a statement, signed by a person duly authorized to act on behalf of the consenting member, stating that such member consents to the apportionment plan with respect to such December 31. The statement shall set forth the name, address, employer identification number, and taxable year of each component member of the group on such December 31, the amount apportioned to each such member under the plan, and the location of the Service Center where the statement is to be filed. The consent of more than one component member may be incorporated in a single statement. The statement shall be timely filed with the Service Center where the component member having the taxable year first ending on or after such December 31 files its return for such taxable year and shall be irrevocable after such filing. If two or more component members have the same such taxable year, a statement of consent may be filed by any one of such members. However, if the due date (including any extensions of time) of the return of such member is on or before December 15, 1971, the required statement shall be considered as timely filed if filed on or before March 15, 1972. Each component member of the group on such December 31 shall keep as a part of its records a copy of the statement containing all the required consents.

    (ii) An apportionment plan adopted by a controlled group with respect to a particular December 31 shall be valid only for the taxable year of each member of the group which includes such December 31. Thus, a controlled group must file a separate consent to an apportionment plan with respect to each taxable year which includes a December 31 as to which an apportionment plan is desired.

    (iii) If the apportionment plan is not timely filed, the $25,000 amount specified in section 46(a)(3) shall be reduced for each component member of the controlled group, for its taxable year which includes a December 31, to an amount equal to $25,000 divided by the number of component members of such group on such December 31.

    (iv) If a component member of the controlled group makes its income tax return on the basis of a 52-53-week taxable year, the principles of section 441(f)(2)(A)(ii) and § 1.441-2 apply in determining the last day of such taxable year.

    (3) Definitions of controlled group of corporations and component member of controlled group. For the purpose of this paragraph, the terms “controlled group of corporations” and “component member” of a controlled group of corporations shall have the same meaning assigned to those terms in section 1563 (a) and (b). For purposes of applying § 1.1563-1(b)(2)(ii)(c), an electing small business corporation shall be treated as an excluded member whether or not it is subject to the tax imposed by section 1378.

    (4) Members of a controlled group filing a consolidated return. If some component members of a controlled group join in filing a consolidated return pursuant to § 1.1502-3(a)(3), and other component members do not join, then, unless a consent is timely filed apportioning the $25,000 amount among the group filing the consolidated return and the other component members of the controlled group, each component member of the controlled group (including each component member which joins in filing the consolidated return) shall be treated as a separate corporation for purposes of equally apportioning the $25,000 amount under subparagraph (2)(iii) of this paragraph. In that case, the tax liability limitation for the group filing the consolidated return is computed by substituting for the $25,000 amount under section 46(a)(3) the total amount apportioned to each component member that joins in filing the consolidated return. If the affiliated group filing the consolidated return and the other component members of the controlled group adopt an apportionment plan, the affiliated group shall be treated as a single member for the purpose of applying subparagraph (2)(i) of this paragraph. Thus, for example, only one consent executed by the common parent to the apportionment plan is required for the group filing the consolidated return. If any component member of the controlled group which joins in the filing of the consolidated return is an organization to which section 593 applies or a cooperative organization described in section 1381(a), see paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of § 1.1502-3.

    (5) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following examples:

    (q) Rehabilitation percentage—(1) General rule—(i) In general. Due to amendments made by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, different rules apply depending on when the property attributable to the qualified rehabilitated expenditures (as defined in § 1.48-12(c)) is placed in service. Paragraph (q)(1)(ii) of this section contains the general rule relating to property placed in service after December 31, 1986. Paragraph (q)(1)(iii) of this section contains rules relating to property placed in service before January 1, 1987. Paragraph (q)(1)(iv) of this section contains rules relating to property placed in service after December 31, 1986, that qualifies for a transition rule.

    (ii) Property placed in service after December 31, 1986. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (q)(1)(iv) of this section, in the case of section 38 property described in section 48(a)(1)(E) placed in service after December 31, 1986, the term “rehabilitation percentage” means—

    (A) 10 percent in the case of qualified rehabilitation expenditures with respect to a qualified rehabilitated building other than a certified historic structure, and

    (B) 20 percent in the case of qualified rehabilitation expenditures with respect to a certified historic structure.

    (iii) Property placed in service before January 1, 1987. For qualified rehabilitation expenditures (as defined in § 1.48-12(c)) with respect to property placed in service before January 1, 1987, section 46(b)(4)(A) as in effect prior to the enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 provided for a three-tier rehabilitation percentage. The applicable rehabilitation percentage for such expenditures depends on whether the qualified rehabilitated building is a “30-year building,” a “40-year building,” or a certified historic structure (as defined in section 48(g)(3) and § 1.48-12(d)(1)). The rehabilitation percentage for such qualified rehabilitation expenditures incurred with respect to a qualified rehabilitated building is 15 percent to the extent that the building is a 30-year building (i.e., at least 30 years, but less than 40 years, has elapsed between the date the physical work on the rehabilitation began and the date the building was first placed in service), 20 percent to the extent that the building is a 40-year building (i.e., at least 40 years has so elapsed), and 25 percent for certified historic structures, regardless of age. See paragraph (q)(2)(ii) of this section for rules concerning buildings to which additions have been added.

    (iv) Property placed in service after December 31, 1986, that qualifies under the transition rules. In the case of section 38 property described in section 48(a)(1)(E) placed in service after December 31, 1986, and to which the amendments made by section 251 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 do not apply because the transition rules in section 251(d) of that Act and § 1.48-12(a)(2)(iv)(B) or (C) apply, the rehabilitation percentage for a “30-year building” (within the meaning of paragraph (q)(1)(iii) of this section) shall be 10 percent, the rehabilitation percentage for a “40-year building” (within the meaning of paragraph (q)(1)(iii) of this section) shall be 13 percent, and the rehabilitation percentage for a certified historic structure shall be 25 percent.

    (2) Special rules—(i) Moved buildings. With respect to paragraph (q)(1)(ii) of this section, § 1.48-12(b)(5) provides that a building (other than a certified historic structure) is not a qualified rehabilitated building unless it has been at the location where it is being rehabilitated since January 1, 1936. In addition, for purposes of paragraph (q)(1) (iii) and (iv) of this section, a building is not a “30-year building” unless it has been at the location where it is being rehabilitated for the thirty-year period immediately preceding the beginning of the rehabilitation process, and is not a “40-year building” unless it has been at the location where it is being rehabilitated for the forty-year period immediately preceding the beginning of the rehabilitation process.

    (ii) Building to which additions have been added—(A) Property placed in service after December 31, 1986. For purposes of paragraph (q)(1)(ii) of this section, if part of a building meets the definition of a qualified rehabilitated building, and part of the building does not meet the definition of a qualified rehabilitated building because such part is an addition that was placed in service after December 31, 1935, the qualified rehabilitation expenditures made to the building must be allocated to the pre-1936 portion of the building and the post-1935 portion of the building using the principles in § 1.48-12(c)(10)(ii). Qualified rehabilitation expenditures attributable to the post-1935 addition shall not qualify for the 10 percent rehabilitation percentage.

    (B) Property placed in service before January 1, 1987, and property qualifying for a transitional rule. For purposes of paragraphs (q)(1) (iii) and (iv) of this section, if part of a building meets the definition of a “40-year building” and part of the building is an addition that was placed in service less than forty years before physical work on the rehabilitation began but more than thirty years before such date, then the qualified rehabilitation expenditures made to the building shall be allocated between the forty year old portion of the building and the thirty year old portion of the building, and a 20 percent rehabilitation percentage shall be applied to the forty year old portion of the building and a 15 percent rehabilitation percentage shall be applied to the thirty year old portion. This allocation shall be made using the principles in § 1.48-12(c)(10)(ii). If an allocation cannot be made between the expenditures to the forty year old portion of the building and the thirty year old portion of the building, then the building will be considered to be a 30-year building. Furthermore, for purposes of this paragraph (q), a building (other than a certified historic structure) is not a qualified rehabilitated building to the extent of that portion of the building that is less than 30 years old. If rehabilitation expenditures are incurred with respect to an addition to a qualified rehabilitated building, but the addition is not considered to be part of the qualified rehabilitated building because the addition does not meet the age requirement in section 48(g)(1)(B) (as in effect prior to its amendment by the Tax Reform Act of 1986) and § 1.48-12(b)(4)(i)(B), then no rehabilitation percentage will be applied to the expenditures attributable to the rehabilitation of the addition. Thus, for purposes of paragraphs (q)(1) (iii) and (iv) of this section, it may be necessary to allocate rehabilitation expenditures incurred with respect to a building between the original portion of the building and the addition.

    (iii) Mixed-use buildings. If qualified rehabilitation expenditures are incurred for property that is excluded from section 38 property described in section 48(a)(1)(E) (because, for example, they are made with respect to a portion of the building used for lodging within the meaning of section 48(a)(3) and § 1.48-1(h)), an allocation of the expenditures must be made between the expenditures that result in an addition to basis that is section 38 property and the expenditures that result in an addition to basis that is excluded from the definition of section 38 property since the rehabilitation percentage is applicable only to section 38 property. These allocations should be made using the principles contained in § 1.48-12(c)(10)(ii).

    (3) Regular and energy percentages not to apply. The regular percentage and the energy percentage shall not apply to that portion of the basis of any building that is attributable to qualified rehabilitation expenditures (as defined in § 1.48-12(c)).

    (4) Effective date. The rehabilitation percentage is applicable only to qualified rehabilitation expenditures (as defined in § 1.48-12(c)). For rules relating to applicability of the regular percentage to qualified rehabilitation expenditures (as defined in § 1.48-11(c)), see § 1.48-11.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(a)Effective dates—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Effective dates—(1) In general. This section is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1975. However, transitional rules under paragraph (g) of this section are effective for certain earlier taxable years.

    (2) Acts covered. This section reflects changes made by the following Acts of Congress:

    (3) Prior regulations. For taxable years beginning before January 1, 1976, see 26 CFR 1.46-1 (Rev. as of April 1, 1979). Those regulations do not reflect changes made by Pub. L. 89-384, Pub. L. 89-389, and Pub. L. 91-172.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(b)General rule. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    General rule. The amount of investment credit (credit) allowed by section 38 for the taxable year is the portion of credit available under section 46(a)(1) that does not exceed the limitation based on tax under section 46(a)(3).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(c)Credit available. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Credit available. The credit available for the taxable year is the sum of—

    (1) Unused credit carried over from prior taxable years under section 46(b) (carryovers).

    (2) Amount of credit determined under section 46(a)(2) for the taxable year (credit earned), and

    (3) Unused credit carried back from succeeding taxable years under section 46(b) (carrybacks).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(d)Credit earned. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Credit earned. The credit earned for the taxable year is the sum of the following percentages of qualified investment (as determined under section 46 (c) and (d))—

    (1) The regular percentage (as determined under section 46),

    (2) For energy property, the energy percentage (as determined under section 46), and

    (3) For the portion of the basis of a qualified rehabilitated building (as defined in § 1.48-12(b)) that is attributable to qualified rehabilitation expenditures (as defined in § 1.48-12(c)), the rehabilitation percentage (as determined under section 46(b)(4)).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(e)Designation of credits. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Designation of credits. The credit available for the taxable year is designated as follows:

    (1) The credit attributable to the regular percentage is the “regular credit”.

    (2) The credit attributable to the ESOP percentage is the “ESOP credit”.

    (3) The credit attributable to the energy percentage for energy property other than solar or wind is the “nonrefundable energy credit”.

    (4) The credit attributable to the energy percentage for solar or wind energy property is the “refundable energy credit”.

    (5) The credit attributable to the rehabilitation percentage for qualified rehabilitation expenditures is the rehabilitation investment credit.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(f)Special rules for certain energy property. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Special rules for certain energy property. Energy property is defined in section 48(l). Under section 46(a)(2)(D), energy property that is section 38 property solely by reason of section 48(l)(1) qualifies only for the energy credit. Other energy property qualifies for both the regular credit (and, if applicable, the ESOP credit) and the energy credit. For limitation on the energy percentage for property financed by industrial development bonds, see section 48(l)(11).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(g)Transitional rule for regular and ESOP credit—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Transitional rule for regular and ESOP credit—(1) In general. Although section 46(a)(2) was amended by section 301(a)(1) of the Energy Tax Act of 1977 to eliminate the transitional rules under section 46(a)(2)(D), those rules still apply in certain instances. Section 46(a)(2)(D) was added by section 301(a) of the Tax Reduction Act of 1975 and amended by section 802(a) of the Tax Reform Act of 1976.

    (2) Regular credit. Under section 46(a)(2)(D), the regular credit is 10 percent and applies for the following property:

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(h)Tax liability limitation—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Tax liability limitation—(1) In general. Section 46(a)(3) provides a tax liability limitation on the amount of credit allowed by section 38 (other than the refundable energy credit) for any taxable year. See section 46(a)(10)(C)(i). Tax liability is defined in paragraph (j) of this section. The excess of available credit over the applicable tax liability limitation for the year is an unused credit which may be carried forward or carried back under section 46(b).

    (2) Regular and ESOP tax liability limitation. In general, the tax liability limitation for the regular and ESOP credits is the portion of tax liability that does not exceed $25,000 plus a percentage of the excess, as determined under section 46(a)(3)(B).

    (3) Nonrefundable energy credit tax liability limitation. (i) For nonrefundable energy credit carrybacks to a taxable year ending before October 1, 1978, the tax liability limitation is the portion of tax liability that does not exceed $25,000 plus a percentage of the excess, as determined under section 46(a)(3)(B).

    (ii) For a taxable year ending after September 30, 1978, the tax liability limitation for available nonrefundable energy credit is 100 percent of the year's tax liability.

    (4) Alternative limitations. Alternative limitations apply for certain utilities, railroads, and airlines in determining the regular tax liability limitation and, for nonrefundable energy credit carrybacks to taxable years ending before October 1, 1978, the nonrefundable energy credit tax liability limitation. These alternative limitations do not apply in determining the energy tax liability limitation for a taxable year ending after October 1, 1978. The provisions listed below set forth the alternative limitations:

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(i)§1.46-1(i) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Regular carryovers;

    (ii) ESOP carryovers;

    (iii) Regular credit earned;

    (iv) ESOP credit earned;

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(j)Tax liability—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Tax liability—(1) In general. “Tax liability” for purposes of the regular and ESOP credit and carrybacks of nonrefundable energy credit to a taxable year ending before October 1, 1978, means the liability for tax as defined in section 46(a)(4). For ordering of regular, ESOP, and nonrefundable energy credits, see paragraph (m) of this section. In addition to taxes excluded under section 46(a)(4), tax liability does not include tax resulting from recapture of credit under section 47 and the alternative minimum tax imposed by section 55. See sections 47(c) and 55(c)(1).

    (2) Certain nonrefundable energy credit. For a taxable year ending after September 30, 1978, “tax liability” for purposes of the nonrefundable energy credit is liability for tax, as defined in section 46(a)(4) and paragraph (j)(1) of this section, reduced by the regular and ESOP credit allowed for the taxable year. Thus, carrybacks of regular or ESOP credit to a taxable year may displace nonrefundable energy carryovers or credit earned taken into account in that year. However, carrybacks of regular, ESOP, or nonrefundable energy credit do not affect refundable energy credit which is treated as an overpayment of tax under section 6401(b). See paragraph (k) of this section.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(k)Special rule for refundable energy credit. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Special rule for refundable energy credit. The amount of the refundable energy credit is determined under the rules of section 46 (other than section 46(a)(3)). However, to permit the refund, the refundable energy credit for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code (other than section 38, part IVB, and chapter 63 of the Code) is treated as allowed by section 39 and not by section 38. The refundable credit is not applied against tax liability for purposes of determining the tax liability limitation for other investment credits. Rather, it is treated as an overpayment of tax under section 6401(b).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(l)FIFO rule. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    FIFO rule. If the credit available for a taxable year is not allowed in full because of the tax liability limitation, special rules determine the order in which credits are applied. Under the first-in-first-out rule of section 46(a)(1) (FIFO), carryovers are applied against the tax liability limitation first. To the extent the tax liability limitation exceeds carryovers, credit earned, and carrybacks are then applied.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(m)Special ordering rule—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Special ordering rule—(1) In general. Under section 46(a)(10)(A), the FIFO rule applies separately—

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(n)Examples. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Examples. The following examples illustrate paragraphs (a) through (m) of this section.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(o)Married individuals. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Married individuals. If a separate return is filed by a husband or wife, the tax liability limitation is computed by substituting a $12,500 amount for the $25,000 amount that applies under section 46(a)(3). However, this reduction of the $25,000 amount to $12,500 applies only if the taxpayer's spouse is entitled to a credit under section 38 for the taxable year of such spouse which ends with, or within, the taxpayer's taxable year. The taxpayer's spouse is entitled to a credit under section 38 either because of investment made in qualified property for such taxable year of the spouse (whether directly made by such spouse or whether apportioned to such spouse, for example, from an electing small business corporation, as defined in section 1371(b)), or because of an investment credit carryback or carryover to such taxable year. The determination of whether an individual is married shall be made under the principles of section 143 and the regulations thereunder.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(p)Apportionment of $25,000 amount among component members of a controlled group—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Apportionment of $25,000 amount among component members of a controlled group—(1) In general. In determining the tax liability limitation under section 46(a)(3) for corporations that are component members of a controlled group on December 31, only one $25,000 amount is available to those component members for their taxable years that include that December 31. See subparagraph (2) of this paragraph for apportionment of such amount among such component members. See subparagraph (3) of this paragraph for definition of “component member”.

    (2) Manner of apportionment. (i) In the case of corporations which are component members of a controlled group on a particular December 31, the $25,000 amount may be apportioned among such members for their taxable years that include such December 31 in any manner the component members may select, provided that each such member less than 100 percent of whose stock is owned, in the aggregate, by the other component members of the group on such December 31 consents to an apportionment plan. The consent of a component member to an apportionment plan with respect to a particular December 31 shall be made by means of a statement, signed by a person duly authorized to act on behalf of the consenting member, stating that such member consents to the apportionment plan with respect to such December 31. The statement shall set forth the name, address, employer identification number, and taxable year of each component member of the group on such December 31, the amount apportioned to each such member under the plan, and the location of the Service Center where the statement is to be filed. The consent of more than one component member may be incorporated in a single statement. The statement shall be timely filed with the Service Center where the component member having the taxable year first ending on or after such December 31 files its return for such taxable year and shall be irrevocable after such filing. If two or more component members have the same such taxable year, a statement of consent may be filed by any one of such members. However, if the due date (including any extensions of time) of the return of such member is on or before December 15, 1971, the required statement shall be considered as timely filed if filed on or before March 15, 1972. Each component member of the group on such December 31 shall keep as a part of its records a copy of the statement containing all the required consents.

    (ii) An apportionment plan adopted by a controlled group with respect to a particular December 31 shall be valid only for the taxable year of each member of the group which includes such December 31. Thus, a controlled group must file a separate consent to an apportionment plan with respect to each taxable year which includes a December 31 as to which an apportionment plan is desired.

    (iii) If the apportionment plan is not timely filed, the $25,000 amount specified in section 46(a)(3) shall be reduced for each component member of the controlled group, for its taxable year which includes a December 31, to an amount equal to $25,000 divided by the number of component members of such group on such December 31.

    (iv) If a component member of the controlled group makes its income tax return on the basis of a 52-53-week taxable year, the principles of section 441(f)(2)(A)(ii) and § 1.441-2 apply in determining the last day of such taxable year.

    (3) Definitions of controlled group of corporations and component member of controlled group. For the purpose of this paragraph, the terms “controlled group of corporations” and “component member” of a controlled group of corporations shall have the same meaning assigned to those terms in section 1563 (a) and (b). For purposes of applying § 1.1563-1(b)(2)(ii)(c), an electing small business corporation shall be treated as an excluded member whether or not it is subject to the tax imposed by section 1378.

    (4) Members of a controlled group filing a consolidated return. If some component members of a controlled group join in filing a consolidated return pursuant to § 1.1502-3(a)(3), and other component members do not join, then, unless a consent is timely filed apportioning the $25,000 amount among the group filing the consolidated return and the other component members of the controlled group, each component member of the controlled group (including each component member which joins in filing the consolidated return) shall be treated as a separate corporation for purposes of equally apportioning the $25,000 amount under subparagraph (2)(iii) of this paragraph. In that case, the tax liability limitation for the group filing the consolidated return is computed by substituting for the $25,000 amount under section 46(a)(3) the total amount apportioned to each component member that joins in filing the consolidated return. If the affiliated group filing the consolidated return and the other component members of the controlled group adopt an apportionment plan, the affiliated group shall be treated as a single member for the purpose of applying subparagraph (2)(i) of this paragraph. Thus, for example, only one consent executed by the common parent to the apportionment plan is required for the group filing the consolidated return. If any component member of the controlled group which joins in the filing of the consolidated return is an organization to which section 593 applies or a cooperative organization described in section 1381(a), see paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of § 1.1502-3.

    (5) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following examples:

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(q)Rehabilitation percentage—(1) General rule—(i) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Rehabilitation percentage—(1) General rule—(i) In general. Due to amendments made by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, different rules apply depending on when the property attributable to the qualified rehabilitated expenditures (as defined in § 1.48-12(c)) is placed in service. Paragraph (q)(1)(ii) of this section contains the general rule relating to property placed in service after December 31, 1986. Paragraph (q)(1)(iii) of this section contains rules relating to property placed in service before January 1, 1987. Paragraph (q)(1)(iv) of this section contains rules relating to property placed in service after December 31, 1986, that qualifies for a transition rule.

    (ii) Property placed in service after December 31, 1986. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (q)(1)(iv) of this section, in the case of section 38 property described in section 48(a)(1)(E) placed in service after December 31, 1986, the term “rehabilitation percentage” means—

    (A) 10 percent in the case of qualified rehabilitation expenditures with respect to a qualified rehabilitated building other than a certified historic structure, and

    (B) 20 percent in the case of qualified rehabilitation expenditures with respect to a certified historic structure.

    (iii) Property placed in service before January 1, 1987. For qualified rehabilitation expenditures (as defined in § 1.48-12(c)) with respect to property placed in service before January 1, 1987, section 46(b)(4)(A) as in effect prior to the enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 provided for a three-tier rehabilitation percentage. The applicable rehabilitation percentage for such expenditures depends on whether the qualified rehabilitated building is a “30-year building,” a “40-year building,” or a certified historic structure (as defined in section 48(g)(3) and § 1.48-12(d)(1)). The rehabilitation percentage for such qualified rehabilitation expenditures incurred with respect to a qualified rehabilitated building is 15 percent to the extent that the building is a 30-year building (i.e., at least 30 years, but less than 40 years, has elapsed between the date the physical work on the rehabilitation began and the date the building was first placed in service), 20 percent to the extent that the building is a 40-year building (i.e., at least 40 years has so elapsed), and 25 percent for certified historic structures, regardless of age. See paragraph (q)(2)(ii) of this section for rules concerning buildings to which additions have been added.

    (iv) Property placed in service after December 31, 1986, that qualifies under the transition rules. In the case of section 38 property described in section 48(a)(1)(E) placed in service after December 31, 1986, and to which the amendments made by section 251 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 do not apply because the transition rules in section 251(d) of that Act and § 1.48-12(a)(2)(iv)(B) or (C) apply, the rehabilitation percentage for a “30-year building” (within the meaning of paragraph (q)(1)(iii) of this section) shall be 10 percent, the rehabilitation percentage for a “40-year building” (within the meaning of paragraph (q)(1)(iii) of this section) shall be 13 percent, and the rehabilitation percentage for a certified historic structure shall be 25 percent.

    (2) Special rules—(i) Moved buildings. With respect to paragraph (q)(1)(ii) of this section, § 1.48-12(b)(5) provides that a building (other than a certified historic structure) is not a qualified rehabilitated building unless it has been at the location where it is being rehabilitated since January 1, 1936. In addition, for purposes of paragraph (q)(1) (iii) and (iv) of this section, a building is not a “30-year building” unless it has been at the location where it is being rehabilitated for the thirty-year period immediately preceding the beginning of the rehabilitation process, and is not a “40-year building” unless it has been at the location where it is being rehabilitated for the forty-year period immediately preceding the beginning of the rehabilitation process.

    (ii) Building to which additions have been added—(A) Property placed in service after December 31, 1986. For purposes of paragraph (q)(1)(ii) of this section, if part of a building meets the definition of a qualified rehabilitated building, and part of the building does not meet the definition of a qualified rehabilitated building because such part is an addition that was placed in service after December 31, 1935, the qualified rehabilitation expenditures made to the building must be allocated to the pre-1936 portion of the building and the post-1935 portion of the building using the principles in § 1.48-12(c)(10)(ii). Qualified rehabilitation expenditures attributable to the post-1935 addition shall not qualify for the 10 percent rehabilitation percentage.

    (B) Property placed in service before January 1, 1987, and property qualifying for a transitional rule. For purposes of paragraphs (q)(1) (iii) and (iv) of this section, if part of a building meets the definition of a “40-year building” and part of the building is an addition that was placed in service less than forty years before physical work on the rehabilitation began but more than thirty years before such date, then the qualified rehabilitation expenditures made to the building shall be allocated between the forty year old portion of the building and the thirty year old portion of the building, and a 20 percent rehabilitation percentage shall be applied to the forty year old portion of the building and a 15 percent rehabilitation percentage shall be applied to the thirty year old portion. This allocation shall be made using the principles in § 1.48-12(c)(10)(ii). If an allocation cannot be made between the expenditures to the forty year old portion of the building and the thirty year old portion of the building, then the building will be considered to be a 30-year building. Furthermore, for purposes of this paragraph (q), a building (other than a certified historic structure) is not a qualified rehabilitated building to the extent of that portion of the building that is less than 30 years old. If rehabilitation expenditures are incurred with respect to an addition to a qualified rehabilitated building, but the addition is not considered to be part of the qualified rehabilitated building because the addition does not meet the age requirement in section 48(g)(1)(B) (as in effect prior to its amendment by the Tax Reform Act of 1986) and § 1.48-12(b)(4)(i)(B), then no rehabilitation percentage will be applied to the expenditures attributable to the rehabilitation of the addition. Thus, for purposes of paragraphs (q)(1) (iii) and (iv) of this section, it may be necessary to allocate rehabilitation expenditures incurred with respect to a building between the original portion of the building and the addition.

    (iii) Mixed-use buildings. If qualified rehabilitation expenditures are incurred for property that is excluded from section 38 property described in section 48(a)(1)(E) (because, for example, they are made with respect to a portion of the building used for lodging within the meaning of section 48(a)(3) and § 1.48-1(h)), an allocation of the expenditures must be made between the expenditures that result in an addition to basis that is section 38 property and the expenditures that result in an addition to basis that is excluded from the definition of section 38 property since the rehabilitation percentage is applicable only to section 38 property. These allocations should be made using the principles contained in § 1.48-12(c)(10)(ii).

    (3) Regular and energy percentages not to apply. The regular percentage and the energy percentage shall not apply to that portion of the basis of any building that is attributable to qualified rehabilitation expenditures (as defined in § 1.48-12(c)).

    (4) Effective date. The rehabilitation percentage is applicable only to qualified rehabilitation expenditures (as defined in § 1.48-12(c)). For rules relating to applicability of the regular percentage to qualified rehabilitation expenditures (as defined in § 1.48-11(c)), see § 1.48-11.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-1(v)§1.46-1(v) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Regular carrybacks; and

    (vi) ESOP carrybacks.

    (3) Example. For an example of the order of application of regular and ESOP credits, see § 1.46-8(c)(9)(iii).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-2Carryback and carryover of unused credit Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) Effective date. This section is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1975. For taxable years beginning before January 1, 1976, see 26 CFR 1.46-2 (Rev. as of April 1, 1979).

    (b) In general. Under section 46(b)(1), unused credit may be carried back and carried over. Carrybacks and carryovers of unused credit are taken into account in determining the amount of credit available and the credit allowed for the taxable years to which they may be carried. In general, the application of the rules of this section to regular and ESOP credits are separate from their application to nonrefundable energy credits. For example, the limitations on carrybacks and carryovers of unused nonrefundable energy credit under section 46(b) (2) and (3), respectively, differ in amount from the limitations on the regular and ESOP credits because the tax liability limitations for those credits differ. See § 1.46-1(h). For a further example, see the special ordering rule in § 1.46-1(m). Section 46(b) does not apply to the refundable energy credit.

    (c) Unused credit. If carryovers and credit earned (as defined in § 1.46-1(c)(1)) exceed the applicable tax liability limitation, the excess attributable to credit earned is an unused credit. The taxable year in which an unused credit arises is referred to as the “unused credit year”.

    (d) Taxable years to which unused credit may be carried. An unused credit is a carryback to each of the 3 taxable years preceding the unused credit year and a carryover to each of the 7 taxable years succeeding the unused credit year. An unused credit must be carried first to the earliest of those 10 taxable years. An unused credit then must be carried to each of the other 9 taxable years (in order of time) to the extent that the unused credit was not absorbed during a prior taxable year because of the limitations under section 46(b) (2) and (3).

    (e) Special rule for pre-1971 years—(1) In general. For unused credit years ending before January 1, 1971, unused credit is allowed a 10-year carryover rather than the 7-year carryover. The principles of paragraph (d) of this section apply to this 10-year carryover.

    (2) Cross reference. For limitations on the taxable years to which unused credit from pre-1971 credit years may be carried, see paragraph (g) of this section.

    (f) Limitations on carrybacks. Under the FIFO rule to section 46(a)(1), carryovers and credit earned are applied against the tax liability limitation before carrybacks. Thus, carrybacks to a taxable year may not exceed the amount by which the applicable tax liability limitation for that year exceeds the sum of carryovers to and credit earned for that year. Carrybacks from an unused credit year are applied against tax liability before carrybacks from a later unused credit year. To the extent an unused credit cannot be carried back to a particular preceding taxable year, the unused credit must be carried to the next succeeding taxable year to which it may be carried.

    (g) Limitations on carryovers—(1) General rule. Carryovers to a taxable year may not exceed the applicable tax liability limitation for that year. Carryovers from an unused credit year are applied before carryovers from a later unused credit year.

    (2) Exception. A 10-year carryover from a pre-1971 unused credit year may, under certain circumstances, be postponed to prevent a later-earned 7-year carryover from expiring. This exception does not extend the 10-year carryover period for pre-1971 unused credit. See section 46(b)(1)(D).

    (h) Examples. The following examples illustrate paragraphs (a) through (g) of this section.

    (i) [Reserved]

    (j) Electing small business corporation. A shareholder of an electing small business corporation (as defined in section 1371(b)) may not take into account unused credit of the corporation attributable to unused credit years for which the corporation was not an electing small business corporation. However, a taxable year for which the corporation is an electing small business corporation is counted as a taxable year for determining the taxable years to which that unused credit may be carried.

    (k) Periods of less than 12 months. A fractional part of a year that is considered a taxable year under sections 441(b) and 7701(a)(23) is treated as a preceding or succeeding taxable year for determining under section 46(b) the taxable years to which an unused credit may be carried.

    (l) Corporate acquisitions. For carryover of unused credits in the case of certain corporate acquisitions, see section 381(c)(23).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-2(a)Effective date. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Effective date. This section is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1975. For taxable years beginning before January 1, 1976, see 26 CFR 1.46-2 (Rev. as of April 1, 1979).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-2(b)In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    In general. Under section 46(b)(1), unused credit may be carried back and carried over. Carrybacks and carryovers of unused credit are taken into account in determining the amount of credit available and the credit allowed for the taxable years to which they may be carried. In general, the application of the rules of this section to regular and ESOP credits are separate from their application to nonrefundable energy credits. For example, the limitations on carrybacks and carryovers of unused nonrefundable energy credit under section 46(b) (2) and (3), respectively, differ in amount from the limitations on the regular and ESOP credits because the tax liability limitations for those credits differ. See § 1.46-1(h). For a further example, see the special ordering rule in § 1.46-1(m). Section 46(b) does not apply to the refundable energy credit.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-2(c)Unused credit. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Unused credit. If carryovers and credit earned (as defined in § 1.46-1(c)(1)) exceed the applicable tax liability limitation, the excess attributable to credit earned is an unused credit. The taxable year in which an unused credit arises is referred to as the “unused credit year”.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-2(d)Taxable years to which unused credit may be carried. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Taxable years to which unused credit may be carried. An unused credit is a carryback to each of the 3 taxable years preceding the unused credit year and a carryover to each of the 7 taxable years succeeding the unused credit year. An unused credit must be carried first to the earliest of those 10 taxable years. An unused credit then must be carried to each of the other 9 taxable years (in order of time) to the extent that the unused credit was not absorbed during a prior taxable year because of the limitations under section 46(b) (2) and (3).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.46-2(e)Special rule for pre-1971 years—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Special rule for pre-1971 years—(1) In general. For unused credit years ending before January 1, 1971, unused credit is allowed a 10-year carryover rather than the 7-year carryover. The principles of paragraph (d) of this section apply to this 10-year carryover.

    (2) Cross reference. For limitations on the taxable years to which unused credit from pre-1971 credit years may be carried, see paragraph (g) of this section.

242 Citing Cases

Respondent also argues that Petitioners are precluded by section 469 from claiming such credits because they did not have any taxable income from passive activities in the years at issue and that Petitioners are liable for accuracy-related penalties under section 6662(a) because their underpayments for those years are attributable to negligence. See § 6662(a), (b)(1), (c). Petitioners counter that section 469 does not apply with respect to credits under section 48, that they had sufficient bases

ommissioner, 62 T.C. 834, 839 (1974)), aff’d without published opinion, 114 F.3d 1194 (9th Cir. 1997). Section 38 permits a general business credit against tax equal to the sum of various enumerated credits, including the investment tax credit under section 46. For all years relevant to these cases, the investment tax credit included the energy credit under section 48. See § 46(2). Relevantly, section 48 provided that the “energy credit for any taxable year is the energy percentage of the basis

Code § 46-204(b)19—does not help the Estate, as the MSA makes no provision for the payment of alimony or maintenance.20 In short, based on the foregoing, even assuming the MSA should be viewed as incorporated into the Judgment, Appeals Officer Duff did Husband agrees that his notarized signature on page [13] of this Agreement constitutes his irrevocable

46:3-17.4 (West 2014) ("Neither spouse may sever, alienate, or otherwise affect their interest in the tenancy by entirety during marriage or upon separation without the written consent ofboth spouses."); id. sec. 46:3-17.5 ("Upon the death ofeither spouse, the surviving spouse shall be deemed to have owned the whole ofall rights under the orig

ner, supra, at 234-239 ("A provision may be either disregarded orjudicially corrected as an error * * * iffailing to do so would result in a disposition that no reasonable person could approve."); 2A Sutherland Stat- utes and Statutory Construction, sec. 46:1 (7th ed.). The "anti-absurdity" canon, while ofancient pedigree, is invoked by courts nowadays quite rarely. In order for a party to show that a "plain meaning" con- struction ofa statute would render it "absurd," the party must show that t

s certain language in one part ofthe statute and different language in another, the court assumes different meanings were intend- ed." Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692, 711 n.9 (2004) (quoting 2A N. Singer, Statutes and Statutory Construction, sec. 46:06, at 194 (6th rev. ed. 2000)). We have no occasion in this case to decide whether "collected proceeds" as used in section 7623(b)(1) is broad enough to include civil penalties paid for violation ofTitle 31. See supra note 6. Even ifthat ques

Nonpartisan Analysis, Study, or Research Foundation argues that even ifthe radio messages refer to and reflect a view on the various ballot measures, its expenditures for the messages were not "direct lobbying communications" or attempts to influence legislation under section 46Respondent argues on briefthat the second radio message's reference to the first effectively incorporates the "will soon be asked" language.

310 (property subject to nonrecourse debt)--are materially distinguishable from his case.

Nonpartisan Analysis, Study, or Research Foundation argues that even ifthe radio messages refer to and reflect a view on the various ballot measures, its expenditures for the messages were not "direct lobbying communications" or attempts to influence legislation under section 46Respondent argues on briefthat the second radio message's reference to the first effectively incorporates the "will soon be asked" language.

ness credit under section 38, including the increasing research activities credit under section 41); A.J. Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-42 (general business credit under section 38, including the investment tax credit under section 46). - 23 - Section 6211(b)(4) provides: SEC. 6211(b). Rules for Application ofSubsection (a).--For purposes ofthis section-- * * * * * * * (4) For purposes ofsubsection (a)-- (A) any excess ofthe sum ofthe credits allowable under sections 24

Rand v. Commissioner 141 T.C. 376 · 2013

ness credit under section 38, including the increasing research activities credit under section 41); A.J. Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-42 (general business credit under section 38, including the investment tax credit under section 46). Of the credits at issue here, only the earned income credit was included in'section 6211(b)(4) in 1988. In 1998 Congress added the additional child tax credit to the Code, and in 2000 it incorporated the credit in the negative tax provis

We hold that s mmaryjudgment is not appropriate as to the precise amount (s_ee section V ofthe argument below), but we hold in favor ofthe IRS on the interpretation and application ofthe economic performance requirement.

Lee E. & Kathy H. Newell, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2010-23 · 2010

Because a member of an Iowa L .L .C ., unlike a limited partner, was not prohibited by State law from participating in the partnership's business and more closely resembled a general partner, we concluded that a member of an Iowa L .L .C . came within the general partner exception of section 1 .469-5T(e)(3)--(ii), Temporary Income Tax 13 - Regs ., sura .

Feller v. Commissioner 135 T.C. No. 25 · 2010

rebate" as does sec. 6664(a). See secs. 6211(b) (2), 6664(a) (flush language). But of course interpretations that render statutory language unnecessary or redundant are generally disfavored. See 2A Singer & Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, sec. 46:6 (7th ed. 2007). - 32 - "underpayment" definition excluded such amounts from an underpayment only by virtue of. the definition's express linkager to the "determined without regard to" phrase of section 6211(b) . The breaking of that linkage

Feller v. Commissioner 135 T.C. 497 · 2010

“rebate” as does sec. 6664(a). See secs. 6211(b)(2), 6664(a) (flush language). But of course interpretations that render statutory language unnecessary or redundant are generally disfavored. See 2A Singer & Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, sec. 46:6 (7th ed. 2007). For similar reasons, I also respectfully disagree with Judge Wherry’s dissent, which depends in large measure on the assumption that “the amount shown as the tax by the taxpayer on his return” under sec. 6664(a)(1)(A) cannot

TG Missouri Corp. v. Commissioner 133 T.C. 278 · 2009

b). It is a well-established principle of statutory construction that a statute must be interpreted as a symmetrical and coherent regulatory scheme, Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., 513 U.S. 561 (1995); 2A Singer & Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, sec. 46:5, at 189-190 (7th ed. 2007), and courts consider the entire legislative scheme of which the particular provision is a part, 2A Singer & Singer, supra at 202-205. “‘[T]he Code must be given “as great an internal symmetry and consistency as it

imes referred to as investment credits). In addition, a substantial part of the project’s assets constituted alternative energy property within the meaning of section 48(l)(3) and constituted energy property eligible for the energy percentage under section 46(b)(2)(A). The partners and DOE relied on the availability of the investment and energy tax credits as a key 9 These contracts obligated the pipeline affiliates to a payment rate substantially above the market price for the gas produced; the

Great American Stageline, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2001-52 · 2001

ed the Charlsons’, but not C & C’s, 1989 Federal income tax return, without challenging the ITC carryover. OPINION 1. Eligibility for Investment Tax Credit Section 38 allows an ITC, for qualified investments, the amount of which is determined under section 46. Section - 4 - 46(e)(3), as in effect in 1985, limited the availability of the ITC to noncorporate lessors, including S corporations. Noncorporate lessors were entitled to the ITC only if either: (A) The lessor manufactured or produced the

Although respondent argues that petitioners are not entitled to an investment tax credit of $3,215 for 1993, respondent’s notice of deficiency does not contain an adjustment to income tax - 23 - to reflect the disallowed credit.11 Since respondent seeks to increase the amount of deficiency, respondent has the burden of proof to establish

Reginald & Ronda Charlson, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2001-52 · 2001

ed the Charlsons’, but not C & C’s, 1989 Federal income tax return, without challenging the ITC carryover. OPINION 1. Eligibility for Investment Tax Credit Section 38 allows an ITC, for qualified investments, the amount of which is determined under section 46. Section - 4 - 46(e)(3), as in effect in 1985, limited the availability of the ITC to noncorporate lessors, including S corporations. Noncorporate lessors were entitled to the ITC only if either: (A) The lessor manufactured or produced the

Kowalchuk v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2000-153 · 2000

4 Petitioner did have a liability for self-employment taxes. - 9 - is that petitioner did not use reasonable and prudent care in investing in and claiming the deductions and credits from this scheme. Respondent’s determinations as to the additions to tax under section 6653(a) are sustained. B. Section 6659--Valuation Overstatement Unde

Bland v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2000-98 · 2000

er contends she suffered while employed by PSC, is recognized as a tort under Oklahoma law. See Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74, 76 (Okla. 1986) (adopting the description of intentional infliction of emotional distress set forth in Restatement, Torts 2d, sec. 46 (1977)). This Court has likewise acknowledged infliction of emotional distress as a tortlike claim for purposes of section 104(a)(2). See Massot v. Commissioner, supra; Gajda v. Commissioner, supra; Brennan v. Commissioner, supra. We thus are

OPINION Before 1986, ITC was allowed under section 46 for the costs of certain types of property.

OPINION Before 1986, ITC was allowed under section 46 for the costs of certain types of property.

Tandon v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1998-66 · 1998

Section 38 property is limited to certain property with respect to which depreciation or amortization is allowable. Sec. 48(a); sec. 1.48-1(a), Income Tax Regs. As observed above, petitioner is not entitled to depreciate the Chrysler. Moreover, because petitioner has not adduced, and we are not aware of, any authority providing that the

Because of the effect of the carryback of this FTC, petitioner was precluded by section 46 from using the ITC carried back from 1979, which was then carried forward to 1981, a year not at issue.

George A. & MarySue Coward, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1997-198 · 1997

48(c)(2)(A) provides: "The cost of used section 38 property taken into account under section 46(c)(1)(B) for any taxable year shall not exceed $100,000." This limitation applies at the partnership level and at the partner level.

Kroposki v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1997-563 · 1997

Section 1001 et seq.; any and all claims under the Connecticut fair employment practices statutes, CGS §46a-60 et seq.; any and all contract or tort claims; and any and all other claims under any federal, state or local statute or ordinance or under any federal, state or local common law.

Roman v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1997-143 · 1997

46-7- 4(D) (Michie 1978) (repealed July 1989). Under New Mexico law in effect during all relevant times, "A gift made in a manner prescribed in the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act * * * is irrevocable and conveys to the minor indefeasibly vested legal title to the security". N.M. Stat. Ann. sec. 46-7- 3(A) (Michie 1978) (repealed July 1989). A tra

Because of the effect of the carryback of this FTC, petitioner was precluded by section 46 from using the ITC carried back from 1979, which was then carried forward to 1981, a year not at issue.

Donald D. & Deborah Bowers, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-333 · 1996

46b-36 (West 1995); Tobey v. Tobey, 165 Conn. 742, 748, 345 A.2d 21, 25 (1974). If the purchase price is paid by one spouse and the conveyance is taken in the name of the other, there is a presumption that a gift to the other spouse is intended. Whitney v. Whitney, 171 Conn. 23, 33, 368 A.2d 96, 102 (1976) (citing Walter v. Home National Bank

Booker v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1996-261 · 1996

Qualified investment in new property is a percentage of the property’s basis, generally its cost. Secs. 46(c)(1), 1012. The lessor of the property, here Encore, may elect to pass through the credit to the lessee, here petitioner, and the lessee generally is treated as having acquired the property for its fair market value. Sec. 48(d). I

Haralampos & Irene Katerelos, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-340 · 1996

Section 46 de- fines the amount of the investment credit to include the regular percentage of the qualified investment determined under section 46(c). Sec. 46(a)(1). Section 46(c)(1) provides that the term - 59 - "qualified investment" means with respect to any taxable year the aggregate of the applicable percentage of the basis of each new sectio

Booker v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1996-347 · 1996

Qualified investment in new property is a percentage of the property’s basis, generally its cost. Secs. 46(c)(1), 1012. The lessor of the property, here Century Concepts, may elect to pass through the credit to the lessee, here petitioner, and the lessee generally is treated as having acquired the property for its fair market value. Sec

That section provides that the interest on the obligations is not taxable as long as (continued...) - 66 - Ultimately, I would hold that the interest on the Bonds is excludable from gross income under section 103(a).

Estate of Mueller v. Commissioner 101 T.C. 551 · 1993

as mailed Nov. 9, 1989.] As we noted in Murphree v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 1309 (1986), some parts of the definition of deficiency may have been placed by the Congress outside sec. 6211; in Murphree, the definitional element appeared in what was then sec. 46(a)(10)(C)(ii). In White v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 209 (1990), we held in effect that an element of the definition of a deficiency appeared in sec. 6601(e)(1). Note that the dissent in Kroh v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 383 (1992), goes only to the

Kenneth & Dorothy Hitchen, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2004-265 · 2004
Kenneth & Dorothy Hitchen, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2004-265 · 2004
Richter v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2002-90 · 2002
McKay v. Commissioner 102 T.C. 465 · 1994
Nalle v. Commissioner 99 T.C. 187 · 1992
Alexander v. Commissioner 97 T.C. 244 · 1991
Borchers v. Commissioner 95 T.C. 82 · 1990
Woody v. Commissioner 95 T.C. 193 · 1990
Estate of Levitt v. Commissioner 95 T.C. 289 · 1990
Hill v. Commissioner 95 T.C. 437 · 1990
Estate of Doherty v. Commissioner 95 T.C. 446 · 1990
Vetco, Inc. v. Commissioner 95 T.C. 579 · 1990
LaPoint v. Commissioner 94 T.C. 733 · 1990
Baicker v. Commissioner 93 T.C. 316 · 1989
Lucky Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner 92 T.C. 1151 · 1989
Soriano v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 44 · 1988
Ronnen v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 74 · 1988
Bailey v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 558 · 1988
Sauey v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 824 · 1988
Cooper v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 84 · 1987
Rose v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 386 · 1987
Porter v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 548 · 1987
DeMartino v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 583 · 1987
Faulkner v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 623 · 1987
Gray v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 1306 · 1987
Kerry v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 327 · 1987
Segel v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 816 · 1987
Cherin v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 986 · 1987
Freesen v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 1123 · 1987
Southern v. Commissioner 87 T.C. 49 · 1986
Munford, Inc. v. Commissioner 87 T.C. 463 · 1986
DeMarco v. Commissioner 87 T.C. 518 · 1986
James v. Commissioner 87 T.C. 905 · 1986
Murphree v. Commissioner 87 T.C. 1309 · 1986
Egizii v. Commissioner 86 T.C. 450 · 1986
Waddell v. Commissioner 86 T.C. 848 · 1986
Seligman v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 191 · 1985
Freesen v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 920 · 1985
Law v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 985 · 1985
Neely v. Commissioner 85 T.C. 934 · 1985
Miller v. Commissioner 85 T.C. 1064 · 1985
Fife v. Commissioner 82 T.C. 1 · 1984
AMERCO v. Commissioner 82 T.C. 654 · 1984
Grow v. Commissioner 80 T.C. 314 · 1983
Cook v. Commissioner 80 T.C. 512 · 1983
Carlson v. Commissioner 79 T.C. 215 · 1982
O'Brien v. Commissioner 79 T.C. 776 · 1982
Lastarmco, Inc. v. Commissioner 79 T.C. 810 · 1982
Eades v. Commissioner 79 T.C. 985 · 1982
Wildman v. Commissioner 78 T.C. 943 · 1982
Zuanich v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 428 · 1981
Hudson v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 468 · 1981
Ridder v. Commissioner 76 T.C. 867 · 1981
Brown v. Commissioner 75 T.C. 172 · 1980
Scott Paper Co. v. Commissioner 74 T.C. 137 · 1980
Estate of Rubinow v. Commissioner 75 T.C. 486 · 1980
Schoneberger v. Commissioner 74 T.C. 1016 · 1980
Bloomberg v. Commissioner 74 T.C. 1368 · 1980
Fegan v. Commissioner 71 T.C. 791 · 1979
Lazisky v. Commissioner 72 T.C. 495 · 1979
Wolfers v. Commissioner 69 T.C. 975 · 1978
Haddock v. Commissioner 70 T.C. 511 · 1978
Bremer v. Commissioner 66 T.C. 360 · 1976
Noell v. Commissioner 66 T.C. 718 · 1976
Mandler v. Commissioner 65 T.C. 586 · 1975
Waxenberg v. Commissioner 62 T.C. 594 · 1974
LTV Corp. v. Commissioner 63 T.C. 39 · 1974
Mueller v. Commissioner 60 T.C. 36 · 1973
Perret v. Commissioner 55 T.C. 712 · 1971
Anderson v. Commissioner 54 T.C. 1035 · 1970
Estate of Chaddock v. Commissioner 54 T.C. 1667 · 1970
Estate of Nutt v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 484 · 1969
Evans v. Commissioner 48 T.C. 704 · 1967
Bryant v. Commissioner 46 T.C. 848 · 1966
Untermann v. Commissioner 38 T.C. 93 · 1962
Hoover v. Commissioner 32 T.C. 618 · 1959
Calhoun v. Commissioner 27 T.C. 115 · 1956
Virginia Duncan v. Rob Bonta · Cir.
Al Otro Lado v. Kristi Noem · Cir.
Island Industries, Inc. v. Sigma Corporation 142 F.4th 1153 · Cir.
Island Industries, Inc. v. Sigma Corporation · Cir.
United States v. Morgan · Cir.
United States v. Avalos · Cir.
United States v. Davis 602 F.3d 643 · Cir.
Whitehouse Hotel Ltd. Partnership v. Commissioner 615 F.3d 321 · Cir.
United States v. Eddie Lipscomb 619 F.3d 474 · Cir.
United States v. Eddie Lipscomb · Cir.
Sidell v. Commissioner 225 F.3d 103 · Cir.
Zimmerman v. Cambridge Credit Counseling Corp. 409 F.3d 473 · Cir.
Remington v. United States 210 F.3d 281 · Cir.
Owner Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Comerica Bank (In Re Arctic Express Inc.) 636 F.3d 781 · Cir.
In Re: Orso 283 F.3d 686 · Cir.
Internal Revenue Ser v. Luongo · Cir.
Finkel v. Whiffen Electric Co. · Cir.
Delaware County v. Federal Housing Finance Agency 747 F.3d 215 · Cir.
Copeland v. Commissioner 290 F.3d 326 · Cir.
Mallo v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Mallo) 774 F.3d 1313 · Cir.
Terri Running v. Joseph Miller 778 F.3d 711 · Cir.
Ellis v. J.R.'s Country Stores, Inc. 779 F.3d 1184 · Cir.
United States v. Serna 309 F.3d 859 · Cir.
In Re: Orange County Water District · Cir.
Orquera v. Ashcroft · Cir.
Banks v. CIR · Cir.
Aeroquip-Vickers v. CIR · Cir.
Estate Edward Kunze v. CIR · Cir.
United States v. Diaz-Diaz 327 F.3d 410 · Cir.
Slobodian v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service 822 F.3d 144 · Cir.
Jay Isaac Hollis v. Loretta Lynch 827 F.3d 436 · Cir.
United States v. Gary Cardaci 856 F.3d 267 · Cir.
Nagr v. Jeff Mangan 933 F.3d 1102 · Cir.
United States v. RaPower-3 960 F.3d 1240 · Cir.
General Medicine, P.C. v. Alex Azar 963 F.3d 516 · Cir.
United States v. Kosinski 976 F.3d 135 · Cir.
United States v. Scott 990 F.3d 94 · Cir.
1-800-Contacts, Inc. v. Federal Trade Comission 1 F.4th 102 · Cir.
Karen Scalin v. Societe Nationale SNCF SA 8 F.4th 509 · Cir.
Delek US Holdings, Inc. v. United States 32 F.4th 495 · Cir.
Canfield v. Orso 214 F.3d 637 · Cir.
United States v. Davis 602 F.3d 643 · Cir.
Gilberton Power Co. v. United States 54 F. App'x 572 · Cir.
Estate of Edward Kunze, Deceased, Carol Ann Hause v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 233 F.3d 948 · Cir.
In the Matter Of: Constance Luongo, Debtor. Internal Revenue Service v. Constance Luongo 259 F.3d 323 · Cir.
Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc. And Subsidiaries, F/k/a Trinova Corp. And Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 347 F.3d 173 · Cir.
Ariel Osvalod Orquera Aldo Agustin Orquera Gladis Mabel Orquera Ariadna Brenda Orquera v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General 357 F.3d 413 · Cir.
Walter Dean v. National Production Workers Un 46 F.4th 535 · Cir.
Andrew Zimmerman v. Cambridge Credit Counseling Corp. 409 F.3d 473 · Cir.
Walter Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal Reven 698 F.3d 160 · Cir.
Windsor v. United States 699 F.3d 169 · Cir.
Berkshire Bank v. Town of Ludlow 708 F.3d 249 · Cir.
United States v. Deleon 704 F.3d 189 · Cir.
RTR Technologies, Inc. v. Helming 707 F.3d 84 · Cir.
Owner Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Comerica Bank 636 F.3d 781 · Cir.
Treasurer of New Jersey v. United States Department of the Treasury 684 F.3d 382 · Cir.
Moco Investments, Inc. v. United States 362 F. App'x 305 · Cir.
Moco Investments, Inc. v. United States 362 F. App'x 305 · Cir.
Frank Sawyer Trust of May 1992 v. Commissioner of Internal Reven 712 F.3d 597 · Cir.
Cargill v. Garland 57 F.4th 447 · Cir.
Renaldo White v. Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Company 104 F.4th 1182 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.