§47 — Rehabilitation credit

110 citing cases

(a)General rule
(1)In general

For purposes of section 46, for any taxable year during the 5-year period beginning in the taxable year in which a qualified rehabilitated building is placed in service, the rehabilitation credit for such year is an amount equal to the ratable share for such year.

(2)Ratable share

For purposes of paragraph (1), the ratable share for any taxable year during the period described in such paragraph is the amount equal to 20 percent of the qualified rehabilitation expenditures with respect to the qualified rehabilitated building, as allocated ratably to each year during such period.

(b)When expenditures taken into account
(1)In general

Qualified rehabilitation expenditures with respect to any qualified rehabilitated building shall be taken into account for the taxable year in which such qualified rehabilitated building is placed in service.

(2)Coordination with subsection (d)

The amount which would (but for this paragraph) be taken into account under paragraph (1) with respect to any qualified rehabilitated building shall be reduced (but not below zero) by any amount of qualified rehabilitation expenditures taken into account under subsection (d) by the taxpayer or a predecessor of the taxpayer (or, in the case of a sale and leaseback described in section 50(a)(2)(C), by the lessee), to the extent any amount so taken into account has not been required to be recaptured under section 50(a).

(c)Definitions

For purposes of this section—

(1)Qualified rehabilitated building
(A)In general

The term “qualified rehabilitated building” means any building (and its structural components) if—

(i)

such building has been substantially rehabilitated,

(ii)

such building was placed in service before the beginning of the rehabilitation,

(iii)

such building is a certified historic structure, and

(iv)

depreciation (or amortization in lieu of depreciation) is allowable with respect to such building.

(B)Substantially rehabilitated defined
(i)In general

For purposes of subparagraph (A)(i), a building shall be treated as having been substantially rehabilitated only if the qualified rehabilitation expenditures during the 24-month period selected by the taxpayer (at the time and in the manner prescribed by regulation) and ending with or within the taxable year exceed the greater of—

(I)

the adjusted basis of such building (and its structural components), or

(II)

$5,000.

(ii)Special rule for phased rehabilitation

In the case of any rehabilitation which may reasonably be expected to be completed in phases set forth in architectural plans and specifications completed before the rehabilitation begins, clause (i) shall be applied by substituting “60-month period” for “24-month period”.

(iii)Lessees

The Secretary shall prescribe by regulation rules for applying this subparagraph to lessees.

The adjusted basis of the building (and its structural components) shall be determined as of the beginning of the 1st day of such 24-month period, or of the holding period of the building, whichever is later. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the determination of the beginning of the holding period shall be made without regard to any reconstruction by the taxpayer in connection with the rehabilitation.

(C)Reconstruction

Rehabilitation includes reconstruction.

(2)Qualified rehabilitation expenditure defined
(A)In general

The term “qualified rehabilitation expenditure” means any amount properly chargeable to capital account—

(i)

for property for which depreciation is allowable under section 168 and which is—

(I)

nonresidential real property,

(II)

residential rental property,

(III)

real property which has a class life of more than 12.5 years, or

(IV)

an addition or improvement to property described in subclause (I), (II), or (III), and

(ii)

in connection with the rehabilitation of a qualified rehabilitated building.

(B)Certain expenditures not included

The term “qualified rehabilitation expenditure” does not include—

(i)Straight line depreciation must be used

Any expenditure with respect to which the taxpayer does not use the straight line method over a recovery period determined under subsection (c) or (g) of section 168. The preceding sentence shall not apply to any expenditure to the extent the alternative depreciation system of section 168(g) applies to such expenditure by reason of subparagraph (B) or (C) of section 168(g)(1).

(ii)Cost of acquisition

The cost of acquiring any building or interest therein.

(iii)Enlargements

Any expenditure attributable to the enlargement of an existing building.

(iv)Certified historic structure

Any expenditure attributable to the rehabilitation of a qualified rehabilitated building unless the rehabilitation is a certified rehabilitation (within the meaning of subparagraph (C)).

(v)Tax-exempt use property
(I)In general

Any expenditure in connection with the rehabilitation of a building which is allocable to the portion of such property which is (or may reasonably be expected to be) tax-exempt use property (within the meaning of section 168(h), except that “50 percent” shall be substituted for “35 percent” in paragraph (1)(B)(iii) thereof).

(II)Clause not to apply for purposes of paragraph (1)(C)

This clause shall not apply for purposes of determining under paragraph (1)(C) whether a building has been substantially rehabilitated.

(vi)Expenditures of lessee

Any expenditure of a lessee of a building if, on the date the rehabilitation is completed, the remaining term of the lease (determined without regard to any renewal periods) is less than the recovery period determined under section 168(c).

(C)Certified rehabilitation

For purposes of subparagraph (B), the term “certified rehabilitation” means any rehabilitation of a certified historic structure which the Secretary of the Interior has certified to the Secretary as being consistent with the historic character of such property or the district in which such property is located.

(D)Nonresidential real property; residential rental property; class life

For purposes of subparagraph (A), the terms “nonresidential real property,” “residential rental property,” and “class life” have the respective meanings given such terms by section 168.

(3)Certified historic structure defined
(A)In general

The term “certified historic structure” means any building (and its structural components) which—

(i)

is listed in the National Register, or

(ii)

is located in a registered historic district and is certified by the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary as being of historic significance to the district.

(B)Registered historic district

The term “registered historic district” means—

(i)

any district listed in the National Register, and

(ii)

any district—

(I)

which is designated under a statute of the appropriate State or local government, if such statute is certified by the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary as containing criteria which will substantially achieve the purpose of preserving and rehabilitating buildings of historic significance to the district, and

(II)

which is certified by the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary as meeting substantially all of the requirements for the listing of districts in the National Register.

(d)Progress expenditures
(1)In general

In the case of any building to which this subsection applies, except as provided in paragraph (3)—

(A)

if such building is self-rehabilitated property, any qualified rehabilitation expenditure with respect to such building shall be taken into account for the taxable year for which such expenditure is properly chargeable to capital account with respect to such building, and

(B)

if such building is not self-rehabilitated property, any qualified rehabilitation expenditure with respect to such building shall be taken into account for the taxable year in which paid.

(2)Property to which subsection applies
(A)In general

This subsection shall apply to any building which is being rehabilitated by or for the taxpayer if—

(i)

the normal rehabilitation period for such building is 2 years or more, and

(ii)

it is reasonable to expect that such building will be a qualified rehabilitated building in the hands of the taxpayer when it is placed in service.

Clauses (i) and (ii) shall be applied on the basis of facts known as of the close of the taxable year of the taxpayer in which the rehabilitation begins (or, if later, at the close of the first taxable year to which an election under this subsection applies).

(B)Normal rehabilitation period

For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term “normal rehabilitation period” means the period reasonably expected to be required for the rehabilitation of the building—

(i)

beginning with the date on which physical work on the rehabilitation begins (or, if later, the first day of the first taxable year to which an election under this subsection applies), and

(ii)

ending on the date on which it is expected that the property will be available for placing in service.

(3)Special rules for applying paragraph (1)

For purposes of paragraph (1)—

(A)Component parts, etc.

Property which is to be a component part of, or is otherwise to be included in, any building to which this subsection applies shall be taken into account—

(i)

at a time not earlier than the time at which it becomes irrevocably devoted to use in the building, and

(ii)

as if (at the time referred to in clause (i)) the taxpayer had expended an amount equal to that portion of the cost to the taxpayer of such component or other property which, for purposes of this subpart, is properly chargeable (during such taxable year) to capital account with respect to such building.

(B)Certain borrowing disregarded

Any amount borrowed directly or indirectly by the taxpayer from the person rehabilitating the property for him shall not be treated as an amount expended for such rehabilitation.

(C)Limitation for buildings which are not self-rehabilitated
(i)In general

In the case of a building which is not self-rehabilitated, the amount taken into account under paragraph (1)(B) for any taxable year shall not exceed the amount which represents the portion of the overall cost to the taxpayer of the rehabilitation which is properly attributable to the portion of the rehabilitation which is completed during such taxable year.

(ii)Carryover of certain amounts

In the case of a building which is not a self-rehabilitated building, if for the taxable year—

(I)

the amount which (but for clause (i)) would have been taken into account under paragraph (1)(B) exceeds the limitation of clause (i), then the amount of such excess shall be taken into account under paragraph (1)(B) for the succeeding taxable year, or

(II)

the limitation of clause (i) exceeds the amount taken into account under paragraph (1)(B), then the amount of such excess shall increase the limitation of clause (i) for the succeeding taxable year.

(D)Determination of percentage of completion

The determination under subparagraph (C)(i) of the portion of the overall cost to the taxpayer of the rehabilitation which is properly attributable to rehabilitation completed during any taxable year shall be made, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, on the basis of engineering or architectural estimates or on the basis of cost accounting records. Unless the taxpayer establishes otherwise by clear and convincing evidence, the rehabilitation shall be deemed to be completed not more rapidly than ratably over the normal rehabilitation period.

(E)No progress expenditures for certain prior periods

No qualified rehabilitation expenditures shall be taken into account under this subsection for any period before the first day of the first taxable year to which an election under this subsection applies.

(F)No progress expenditures for property for year it is placed in service, etc.

In the case of any building, no qualified rehabilitation expenditures shall be taken into account under this subsection for the earlier of—

(i)

the taxable year in which the building is placed in service, or

(ii)

the first taxable year for which recapture is required under section 50(a)(2) with respect to such property,

or for any taxable year thereafter.

(4)Self-rehabilitated building

For purposes of this subsection, the term “self-rehabilitated building” means any building if it is reasonable to believe that more than half of the qualified rehabilitation expenditures for such building will be made directly by the taxpayer.

(5)Election

This subsection shall apply to any taxpayer only if such taxpayer has made an election under this paragraph. Such an election shall apply to the taxable year for which made and all subsequent taxable years. Such an election, once made, may be revoked only with the consent of the Secretary.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-1Recomputation of credit allowed by section 38 Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) General rule—(1) In general. (i) If during the taxable year any section 38 property the basis (or cost) of which was taken into account, under paragraph (a) of § 1.46-3, in computing the taxpayer's qualified investment is disposed of, or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property or becomes public utility property (as defined in paragraph (g) of § 1.46-3) or is a qualifying commuter highway vehicle (as defined in paragraph (a) of § 1.46-11) which undergoes a change in use (as defined in paragraph (m)(2) of this section) with respect to the taxpayer, before the close of the estimated useful life (as determined under subparagraph (2)(i) of this paragraph) which was taken into account in computing such qualified investment, then the credit earned for the credit year (as defined in subdivision (ii)(a) of this subparagraph) shall be recomputed under the principles of paragraph (a) of § 1.46-1 and paragraph (a) of § 1.46-3 substituting, in lieu of the estimated useful life of the property that was taken into account originally in computing qualified investment, the actual useful life of the property as determined under subparagraph (2)(ii) of this paragraph. There shall also be recomputed under the principles of §§ 1.46-1 and 1.46-2 the credit allowed for the credit year and for any other taxable year affected by reason of the reduction in credit earned for the credit year, giving effect to such reduction in the computation of carryovers or carrybacks of unused credit. If the recomputation described in the preceding sentence results in the aggregate in a decrease (taking into account any recomputations under this paragraph in respect of prior recapture years, as defined in subdivision (ii)(b) of this subparagraph) in the credits allowed for the credit year and for any other taxable year affected by the reduction in credit earned for the credit year, then the income tax for the recapture year shall be increased by the amount of such decrease in credits allowed. For treatment of such increase in tax, see paragraph (b) of this section. For rules relating to “disposition” and “cessation”, see § 1.47-2. For rules relating to certain exceptions to the application of this section, see § 1.47-3. For special rules in the case of an electing small business corporation (as defined in section 1371(b)), an estate or trust, or a partnership, see respectively, §§ 1.47-4, 1.47-5, or 1.47-6. For rules applicable to energy property, see paragraph (h) of this section. For special rules relating to recomputation of credit allowed by section 38 if progress expenditure property (as defined in § 1.46-5(d)) ceases to be progress expenditure property with respect to the taxpayer, see paragraph (g) of this section.

    (ii) For purposes of this section and §§ 1.47-2 through 1.47-6—

    (a) The term “credit year” means the taxable year in which section 38 property was taken into account in computing a taxpayer's qualified investment.

    (b) The term “recapture year” means the taxable year in which section 38 property the basis (or cost) of which was taken into account in computing a taxpayer's qualified investment is disposed of, or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property or becomes public utility property with respect to the taxpayer, before the close of the estimated useful life which was taken into account in computing such qualified investment.

    (c) The term “recapture determination” means a recomputation made under this paragraph.

    (2) Rules for applying subparagraph (1). For purposes of subparagraph (1) of this paragraph—

    (i) In determining whether section 38 property is disposed of, or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer, before the close of the estimated useful life which was taken into account in computing the taxpayer's qualified investment, the term “estimated useful life” means the shortest life of the useful life category within which falls the estimated useful life which was assigned to such property under paragraph (e) of § 1.46-3. Thus, section 38 property which is assigned, under paragraph (e) of § 1.46-3, an estimated useful life of 6 years shall not be treated, for purposes of subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, as having been disposed of before the close of its estimated useful life if such property is sold 5 years (that is, the shortest life of the 5 years or more but less than 7 years useful life category) after the date on which it was placed in service. Likewise, section 38 property with an estimated useful life of 15 years which is placed in service on January 1, 1972, shall not be treated as having been disposed of before the close of its estimated useful life if such property is sold at any time after January 1, 1979 (that is, 7 years or more after the date on which it was placed in service).

    (ii) In determining the recomputed qualified investment with respect to property which is disposed of or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property the term “actual useful life” means, except as otherwise provided in this section and §§ 1.47-2 through 1.47-6, the period beginning with the date on which the property was placed in service by the taxpayer and ending with the date of such disposition or cessation. See paragraph (c) of this section.

    (iii) In determining the recomputed qualified investment with respect to property which ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer after August 15, 1971, or which becomes public utility property after such date, such property shall be treated as if it were property described in section 50 at the time it was placed in service (whether or not it was property described in section 50 at such time). Thus, if property was placed in service on October 15, 1968, and was assigned an estimated useful life of 4 years, there would be no increase in tax under section 47 if the property were disposed of at any time after October 14, 1971, that is, 3 years or more after the property was placed in service.

    (b) Increase in income tax and reduction of investment credit carryover—(1) Increase in tax. Except as provided in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph, any increase in income tax under this section shall be treated as income tax imposed on the taxpayer by chapter 1 of the Code for the recapture year notwithstanding that without regard to such increase the taxpayer has no income tax liability, has a net operating loss for such taxable year, or no income tax return was otherwise required for such taxable year.

    (2) Special rule. Any increase in income tax under this section shall not be treated as income tax imposed on the taxpayer by chapter 1 of the Code for purposes of determining the amount of the credits allowable to such taxpayer under—

    (i) Section 33 (relating to taxes of foreign countries and possessions of United States),

    (ii) Section 34 (relating to dividends received by individuals before January 1, 1965),

    (iii) Section 35 (relating to partially tax-exempt interest received by individuals),

    (iv) Section 37 (relating to retirement income), and

    (v) Section 38 (relating to investment in certain depreciable property).

    (3) Reduction in credit allowed as a result of a net operating loss carryback. (i) If a net operating loss carryback from the recapture year or from any taxable year subsequent to the recapture year reduces the amount allowed as a credit under section 38 for any taxable year up to and including the recapture year, then there shall be a new recapture determination under paragraph (a) of this section for each recapture year affected, taking into account the reduced amount of credit allowed after application of the net operating loss carryback.

    (ii) Subdivision (i) of this subparagraph may be illustrated by the following examples:

    (4) Statement of recomputation. The taxpayer shall attach to his income tax return for the recapture year a separate statement showing in detail the computation of the increase in income tax imposed on such taxpayer by chapter 1 of the Code and the reduction in any investment credit carryovers.

    (c) Date placed in service and date of disposition or cessation—(1) General rule. For purposes of this section and §§ 1.47-2 through 1.47-6, in determining the actual useful life of section 38 property—

    (i) Such property shall be treated as placed in service on the first day of the month in which such property is placed in service. The month in which property is placed in service shall be determined under the principles of paragraph (d) of § 1.46-3.

    (ii) If during the taxable year such property ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer—

    (a) As a result of the occurrence of an event on a specific date (for example, a sale, transfer, retirement or other disposition), such cessation shall be treated as having occurred on the actual date of such event.

    (b) For any reason other than the occurrence of an event on a specific date (for example, because such property is used predominantly in connection with the furnishing of lodging during such taxable year), such cessation shall be treated as having occurred on the first day of such taxable year.

    (2) Special rule. Notwithstanding subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, if a taxpayer uses an averaging convention (see § 1.167(a)(10)) in computing depreciation with respect to section 38 property, then, for purposes of this section and §§ 1.47-2 through 1.47-6, he may use the assumed dates of additions and retirements in determining the actual useful life of such property provided such assumed dates are used consistently for purposes of subpart B of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Code with respect to all section 38 property for which such convention is used for purposes of depreciation. This subparagraph shall not apply in any case where from all the facts and circumstances it appears that the use of such assumed dates results in a substantial distortion of the investment credit allowed by section 38. Thus, for example, if the taxpayer computes depreciation under a convention under which the average of the beginning and ending balances of the asset account for the taxable year are taken into account, he may use July 1 as the assumed date of all additions and retirements to such account. Similarly, if the taxpayer computes depreciation under a convention under which the average of the beginning and ending balances of the asset account for each month is taken into account, he may use the date determined by reference to the weighted average of the monthly averages as the assumed date of all additions and retirements to such account.

    (3) Example. This paragraph may be illustrated by the following example:

    (d) Examples. Paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section may be illustrated by the following examples:

    (e) Identification of property—(1) General rule—(i) Record requirements. In general, the taxpayer must maintain records from which he can establish, with respect to each item of section 38 property, the following facts:

    (a) The date the property is disposed of or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property,

    (b) The estimated useful life which was assigned to the property under paragraph (e) of § 1.46-3,

    (c) The month and the taxable year in which the property was placed in service, and

    (d) The basis (or cost), actually or reasonably determined, of the property.

    (ii) Recapture determination. For purposes of determining whether section 38 property is disposed of, or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer, before the close of its estimated useful life, and for purposes of determining recomputed qualified investment, the taxpayer must establish from his records the facts required by subdivision (i) of this subparagraph.

    (iii) Examples. If the taxpayer fails to maintain records from which he can establish the facts required by subdivision (i) of this subparagraph, then this section shall be applied to the taxpayer in the manner indicated in the following examples:

    (2) Treatment of “mass assets”. (i) If, in the case of mass assets (as defined in subparagraph (4) of this paragraph), it is impracticable for the taxpayer to maintain records from which he can establish with respect to each item of section 38 property the facts required by subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, and if he adopts other reasonable recordkeeping practices, consonant with good accounting and engineering practices, and consistent with his prior recordkeeping practices, then he may substitute data from an appropriate mortality dispersion table. An appropriate mortality dispersion table must be based on an acceptable sampling of the taxpayer's actual experience or other acceptable statistical or engineering techniques. In lieu of such mortality dispersion table, the taxpayer may use a standard mortality dispersion table prescribed by the Commissioner. If the taxpayer uses such standard mortality dispersion table for any taxable year, it must be used for all subsequent taxable years unless the taxpayer obtains the consent of the Commissioner to change. If mass assets are placed in a multiple asset account and if the depreciation rate for such account is based on the maximum expected life of the longest lived asset in such account, in applying a mortality dispersion table (including a standard mortality dispersion table) the average expected useful life of the mass assets in such account must be used.

    (ii) Subdivision (i) of this subparagraph shall not apply with respect to assets placed in service in a taxable year ending on or after June 30, 1967, and beginning before January 1, 1971, or with respect to assets placed in service for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1970, for which the taxpayer has not made the election provided by section 167(m), unless the estimated useful lives which were assigned to such assets for purposes of determining qualified investment—

    (a) Were separate lives based on the estimated range of years taken into account in establishing the average useful life of assets similar in kind under paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(b) of § 1.46-3, and

    (b) Were determined by use of a mortality dispersion table (including a standard mortality dispersion table).

    (iii) Any standard mortality dispersion table prescribed by the Commissioner shall be based on average useful life categories and with respect to each category shall contain five columns, the first four of which shall state the percentage of property assumed to have a useful life of—

    Column (1): Less than 4 years,

    Column (2): 4 years or more but less than 6 years,

    Column (3): 6 years or more but less than 8 years, and

    Column (4): 8 years or more.

    The fifth column shall show the total qualified investment as a percentage and shall be used in connection with the determination to be made under § 1.46-3(e)(3)(iii). In the case of a table which is to apply to property which is described in section 50 or to property which is treated as property described in section 50 under paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section, this subdivision shall be applied by substituting “3 years” for “4 years”, “5 years” for “6 years”, and “7 years” for “8 years”.

    (iv) Whenever the standard mortality dispersion table is used for a taxable year under subdivision (i) of this subparagraph (whether or not such table was used in determining qualified investment), the percentage of property shown in column (1) of the table shall (for purposes of section 47, this section, and §§ 1.47-2 through 1.47-6) be deemed to have been disposed of on the day before the expiration of the 4-year period beginning on the date on which it was considered as placed in service under § 1.47-1(c); the percentage of property shown in column (2) of the table shall be deemed to have been disposed of on the day before the expiration of the 6-year period beginning on the date on which it was so considered as placed in service; and the percentage of property shown in column (3) shall be deemed to have been disposed of on the day before the expiration of the 8-year period beginning on the date on which it was so considered as placed in service. In applying this subdivision for purposes of recomputing qualified investment, the proper average useful life category shall be used whether or not such category was used in determining qualified investment. In the case of property which is described in section 50 or property which is treated as property described in section 50 under paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section (other than property the qualified investment with respect to which was determined by use of the standard or an appropriate mortality dispersion table), this subdivision shall be applied by substituting “3-year period” for “4-year period”, “5-year period” for “6-year period”, and “7-year period” for “8-year period”.

    (v) In lieu of using subdivision (iv) of this subparagraph for purposes of recomputing qualified investment, a taxpayer may, for the first recapture year (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(b) of this section) to which such subdivision (iv) would otherwise apply with respect to any mass asset account, recompute qualified investment on the basis of the difference between (a) the proper total qualified investment based on the percentage shown in column (5) of the table, and (b) the total qualified investment actually claimed by the taxpayer for the year in which the property was placed in service.

    (vi) Subdivision (i) of this subparagraph shall not apply with respect to section 38 property to which an election under section 167(m) applies unless the taxpayer assigns actual retirements of such section 38 property for all taxable years to the same vintage account for purposes of section 47 and for purposes of computing the allowance for depreciation under section 167. The assignment of actual retirements of section 38 property for a taxable year to particular vintage accounts may be made on the basis of an appropriate mortality dispersion table (based on an acceptable sampling of the taxpayer's actual experience or other statistical or engineering techniques) or on the basis of a standard mortality dispersion table prescribed by the Commissioner. If the taxpayer assigns actual retirements for any taxable year to particular vintage accounts on the basis of such standard mortality dispersion table, actual retirements for all subsequent taxable years must be assigned to particular vintage accounts on the basis of such table. Actual retirements of section 38 property for a taxable year shall be assigned to particular vintage accounts by—

    (a) Determining the expected retirements for such taxable year from each vintage account containing such section 38 property, and

    (b) Ratably allocating such actual retirements to each vintage account containing such section 38 property.

    However, the unadjusted basis of retired assets assigned to any particular vintage account shall not exceed the unadjusted basis of the property contained in such account.

    (3) Special rules. (i) Taxpayers who properly determine estimated useful lives under § 1.46-3(e)(3) (ii)(b) or (iii) may treat such assets as having been disposed of or having ceased to be section 38 assets in the order of the estimated useful lives that were assigned to such assets. Thus, the asset that is first disposed of or first ceases to be section 38 property may be treated as the asset to which there was assigned the shortest estimated useful life; the next asset disposed of or ceasing to be section 38 property may be treated as the asset to which there was assigned the second shortest life, etc.

    (ii) In the case of taxpayers who use the rule of subdivision (i) of this subparagraph with respect to mass assets for which the estimated useful life was determined under § 1.46-3(e)(3)(iii), if the dispersion shown by the mortality dispersion table effective for a taxable year subsequent to the credit year is the same as the dispersion shown by the mortality table that was effective for the credit year (for example, if the same average useful life on the standard mortality dispersion table reflects the taxpayer's experience for both such years), no recapture determination is required for such subsequent taxable year.

    (iii) Notwithstanding subdivision (i) of this subparagraph, taxpayers who, for purposes of determining qualified investment, do not use a mortality dispersion table with respect to certain section 38 assets similar in kind but who consistently assign under paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(b) of § 1.46-3 to such assets separate lives based on the estimated range of years taken into consideration in establishing the average useful life of such assets, may select the order in which such assets shall be considered as having been disposed of, regardless of the taxable years in which such assets were placed in service. If a taxpayer uses the method provided in this subdivision to determine that any asset is considered as having been disposed of, then, in addition to complying with the record requirements of subparagraph (1)(i) of this paragraph, such taxpayer must maintain records from which he can establish to the satisfaction of the district director that such asset has not previously been considered as having been disposed of. In addition, if, for any taxable year, a taxpayer uses the method provided in this subdivision for any asset, he must use for such year and for each subsequent taxable year (unless he obtains the district director's consent to change) with respect to all assets similar in kind to such asset—

    (a) The method of determining estimated useful lives described in paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(b) of § 1.46-3, and

    (b) The method he has selected under this subdivision for determining the order in which such assets are considered as having been disposed of.

    A request by a taxpayer to obtain the district director's consent to change a system or method described in this subdivision with respect to assets similar in kind must be submitted to the district director on or before the last day of the taxable year with respect to which the change is sought.

    (iv) Notwithstanding subdivisions (i), (ii), and (iii) of this subparagraph, there shall be taken into account separately any abnormal retirement of section 38 property of substantial value for which the estimated useful life was determined under § 1.46-3(e)(3) (ii)(b) or (iii). For definition of abnormal retirement, see paragraph (b) of § 1.167(a)-8.

    (4) [Reserved]

    (5) Example. This paragraph may be illustrated by the following example:

    (f) Public utility property—(1) Recomputed qualified investment. In recomputing qualified investment with respect to section 38 property which becomes public utility property (as defined in paragraph (g) of § 1.46-3)—

    (i) If such property becomes public utility property less than 3 years from the date on which it was placed in service, then such property shall be treated as public utility property for its entire useful life.

    (ii) If such property becomes public utility property 3 years or more but less than 5 years from the date on which it was placed in service, then such property shall be treated as section 38 property which is not public utility property for the first 3 years of its estimated useful life and as public utility property for the remaining period of its estimated useful life.

    (iii) If such property becomes public utility property 5 years or more but less than 7 years from the date on which it was placed in service, then such property shall be treated as section 38 property which is not public utility property for the first 5 years of its estimated useful life and as public utility property for the remaining period of its estimated useful life.

    If property becomes public utility property before August 16, 1971, this subparagraph shall be applied by substituting “4 years” for “3 years”, “6 years” for “5 years”, and “8 years” for “7 years”.

    (2) Examples. Subparagraph (1) of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following examples:

    (g) Special rules for progress expenditure property. Under section 47(a)(3), a recapture determination is required if property ceases to be progress expenditure property (as defined in § 1.46-5(d)). Property ceases to be progress expenditure property if it is sold or otherwise disposed of before it is placed in service. For example, cancellation of the contract for progress expenditure property or abandonment of the project by the taxpayer will be considered a “disposition” within the meaning of § 1.47-2. A cessation occurs if progress expenditure property ceases to be property that will be section 38 property with a useful life of 7 years or more when placed in service. In general, a sale and leaseback is treated as a cessation. However, see paragraph (g)(2) of § 1.47-3 for special rules for certain sale and leaseback transactions. Recapture determinations for progress expenditure property are to be made in a way similar to that provided under §§ 1.47-1 through 1.47-6. Reduction of qualified investment must begin with the most recent credit year (i.e., the most recent taxable year the property is taken into account in computing qualified investment under § 1.46-3 or 1.46-5).

    (h) Special rules for energy property—(1) In general. A recapture determination is required for the investment credit attributable to the energy percentage (energy credit) if property is (i) disposed of or (ii) otherwise ceases to be energy property (as defined in section 48(l)) with regard to the taxpayer before the close of the estimated useful life (as determined under paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section) which was taken into account in computing qualified investment.

    (2) Dispositions. The term “disposition” is described in § 1.47-2(a)(1). A transfer of energy property that is a “disposition” requiring a recapture determination for the investment credit attributable to the regular percentage (regular credit) and the ESOP percentage (ESOP credit) will also be a “disposition” requiring a recapture determination for the energy credit.

    (3) Cessation. (i) The term “cessation” is described in § 1.47-2(a)(2). For energy property, a cessation occurs during a taxable year if, by reason of a change in use or otherwise, the property would not have qualified for an energy credit if placed in service during that year. A change in use will not require a recapture determination for the regular or ESOP credit unless, by reason of the change, the property would not have qualified for the regular or ESOP credit if placed in service during that year.

    (ii) A qualified intercity bus described in § 1.48-9(q) must meet the predominant use test (of § 1.48-9(q)(7)) for the remainder of the taxable year from the date it is placed in service and for each taxable year thereafter. A cessation occurs in any taxable year in which the bus is no longer a qualifying bus under § 1.48-9(q)(6). A qualified intercity bus does not cease to be energy property for a taxable year subsequent to the one in which it was placed in service by reason of a decrease in operating capacity (see § 1.48-9(q)(9)) for that year compared to any prior taxable year.

    (4) Recordkeeping requirement. For recordkeeping requirements with respect to dispositions or cessations, the rules of paragraph (e)(1) of this section apply. For example, the taxpayer must maintain records for each recycling facility indicating the percentage of virgin materials used each year. See, § 1.48-9(g)(5)(ii).

    (5) Examples. The following examples illustrate this paragraph (h).

    (i)-(l) [Reserved]

    (m) Commuter highway vehicles—(1) Recomputed qualified investment. (i) If a qualifying commuter highway vehicle (as defined in § 1.46-11(a) undergoes a change in use but does not cease to be section 38 property, qualified investment for that vehicle is recomputed as if the vehicle was section 38 property which is not a qualifying commuter highway vehicle for its entire useful life.

    (ii) The following example illustrates this paragraph (m)(1).

    (2) Change in use—(i) A qualifying commuter highway vehicle undergoes a change in use if the vehicle does not meet the commuter use requirement (as defined in § 1.46-11(d)) for each computation period.

    (ii) Each of the following is a computation period:

    (A) The period beginning on the date the vehicle was placed in service and ending on the last day of the taxpayer's taxable year in which the vehicle was placed in service;

    (B) Each of the taxpayer's taxable years beginning after the date the vehicle was placed in service and ending before the end of the first 36 months after the vehicle was placed in service; and

    (C) The period ending at the end of the first 36 months after the vehicle was placed in service and beginning on the first day of the taxpayer's taxable year in which the end of those first 36 months falls.

    (iii) The following example illustrates this paragraph (m)(2).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-1(a)The method of determining estimated useful lives described in paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(b) of § 1. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    The method of determining estimated useful lives described in paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(b) of § 1.46-3, and

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-1(b)The method he has selected under this subdivision for determining the order in which such assets are considered as having been disposed of. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    The method he has selected under this subdivision for determining the order in which such assets are considered as having been disposed of.

    A request by a taxpayer to obtain the district director's consent to change a system or method described in this subdivision with respect to assets similar in kind must be submitted to the district director on or before the last day of the taxable year with respect to which the change is sought.

    (iv) Notwithstanding subdivisions (i), (ii), and (iii) of this subparagraph, there shall be taken into account separately any abnormal retirement of section 38 property of substantial value for which the estimated useful life was determined under § 1.46-3(e)(3) (ii)(b) or (iii). For definition of abnormal retirement, see paragraph (b) of § 1.167(a)-8.

    (4) [Reserved]

    (5) Example. This paragraph may be illustrated by the following example:

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-1(c)§1.47-1(c) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    The month and the taxable year in which the property was placed in service, and

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-1(d)The basis (or cost), actually or reasonably determined, of the property. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    The basis (or cost), actually or reasonably determined, of the property.

    (ii) Recapture determination. For purposes of determining whether section 38 property is disposed of, or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer, before the close of its estimated useful life, and for purposes of determining recomputed qualified investment, the taxpayer must establish from his records the facts required by subdivision (i) of this subparagraph.

    (iii) Examples. If the taxpayer fails to maintain records from which he can establish the facts required by subdivision (i) of this subparagraph, then this section shall be applied to the taxpayer in the manner indicated in the following examples:

    (2) Treatment of “mass assets”. (i) If, in the case of mass assets (as defined in subparagraph (4) of this paragraph), it is impracticable for the taxpayer to maintain records from which he can establish with respect to each item of section 38 property the facts required by subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, and if he adopts other reasonable recordkeeping practices, consonant with good accounting and engineering practices, and consistent with his prior recordkeeping practices, then he may substitute data from an appropriate mortality dispersion table. An appropriate mortality dispersion table must be based on an acceptable sampling of the taxpayer's actual experience or other acceptable statistical or engineering techniques. In lieu of such mortality dispersion table, the taxpayer may use a standard mortality dispersion table prescribed by the Commissioner. If the taxpayer uses such standard mortality dispersion table for any taxable year, it must be used for all subsequent taxable years unless the taxpayer obtains the consent of the Commissioner to change. If mass assets are placed in a multiple asset account and if the depreciation rate for such account is based on the maximum expected life of the longest lived asset in such account, in applying a mortality dispersion table (including a standard mortality dispersion table) the average expected useful life of the mass assets in such account must be used.

    (ii) Subdivision (i) of this subparagraph shall not apply with respect to assets placed in service in a taxable year ending on or after June 30, 1967, and beginning before January 1, 1971, or with respect to assets placed in service for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1970, for which the taxpayer has not made the election provided by section 167(m), unless the estimated useful lives which were assigned to such assets for purposes of determining qualified investment—

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-1(e)Identification of property—(1) General rule—(i) Record requirements. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Identification of property—(1) General rule—(i) Record requirements. In general, the taxpayer must maintain records from which he can establish, with respect to each item of section 38 property, the following facts:

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-1(f)Public utility property—(1) Recomputed qualified investment. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Public utility property—(1) Recomputed qualified investment. In recomputing qualified investment with respect to section 38 property which becomes public utility property (as defined in paragraph (g) of § 1.46-3)—

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-1(g)Special rules for progress expenditure property. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Special rules for progress expenditure property. Under section 47(a)(3), a recapture determination is required if property ceases to be progress expenditure property (as defined in § 1.46-5(d)). Property ceases to be progress expenditure property if it is sold or otherwise disposed of before it is placed in service. For example, cancellation of the contract for progress expenditure property or abandonment of the project by the taxpayer will be considered a “disposition” within the meaning of § 1.47-2. A cessation occurs if progress expenditure property ceases to be property that will be section 38 property with a useful life of 7 years or more when placed in service. In general, a sale and leaseback is treated as a cessation. However, see paragraph (g)(2) of § 1.47-3 for special rules for certain sale and leaseback transactions. Recapture determinations for progress expenditure property are to be made in a way similar to that provided under §§ 1.47-1 through 1.47-6. Reduction of qualified investment must begin with the most recent credit year (i.e., the most recent taxable year the property is taken into account in computing qualified investment under § 1.46-3 or 1.46-5).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-1(h)Special rules for energy property—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Special rules for energy property—(1) In general. A recapture determination is required for the investment credit attributable to the energy percentage (energy credit) if property is (i) disposed of or (ii) otherwise ceases to be energy property (as defined in section 48(l)) with regard to the taxpayer before the close of the estimated useful life (as determined under paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section) which was taken into account in computing qualified investment.

    (2) Dispositions. The term “disposition” is described in § 1.47-2(a)(1). A transfer of energy property that is a “disposition” requiring a recapture determination for the investment credit attributable to the regular percentage (regular credit) and the ESOP percentage (ESOP credit) will also be a “disposition” requiring a recapture determination for the energy credit.

    (3) Cessation. (i) The term “cessation” is described in § 1.47-2(a)(2). For energy property, a cessation occurs during a taxable year if, by reason of a change in use or otherwise, the property would not have qualified for an energy credit if placed in service during that year. A change in use will not require a recapture determination for the regular or ESOP credit unless, by reason of the change, the property would not have qualified for the regular or ESOP credit if placed in service during that year.

    (ii) A qualified intercity bus described in § 1.48-9(q) must meet the predominant use test (of § 1.48-9(q)(7)) for the remainder of the taxable year from the date it is placed in service and for each taxable year thereafter. A cessation occurs in any taxable year in which the bus is no longer a qualifying bus under § 1.48-9(q)(6). A qualified intercity bus does not cease to be energy property for a taxable year subsequent to the one in which it was placed in service by reason of a decrease in operating capacity (see § 1.48-9(q)(9)) for that year compared to any prior taxable year.

    (4) Recordkeeping requirement. For recordkeeping requirements with respect to dispositions or cessations, the rules of paragraph (e)(1) of this section apply. For example, the taxpayer must maintain records for each recycling facility indicating the percentage of virgin materials used each year. See, § 1.48-9(g)(5)(ii).

    (5) Examples. The following examples illustrate this paragraph (h).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-1(i)§1.47-1(i) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    -(l) [Reserved]

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-1(m)Commuter highway vehicles—(1) Recomputed qualified investment. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Commuter highway vehicles—(1) Recomputed qualified investment. (i) If a qualifying commuter highway vehicle (as defined in § 1.46-11(a) undergoes a change in use but does not cease to be section 38 property, qualified investment for that vehicle is recomputed as if the vehicle was section 38 property which is not a qualifying commuter highway vehicle for its entire useful life.

    (ii) The following example illustrates this paragraph (m)(1).

    (2) Change in use—(i) A qualifying commuter highway vehicle undergoes a change in use if the vehicle does not meet the commuter use requirement (as defined in § 1.46-11(d)) for each computation period.

    (ii) Each of the following is a computation period:

    (A) The period beginning on the date the vehicle was placed in service and ending on the last day of the taxpayer's taxable year in which the vehicle was placed in service;

    (B) Each of the taxpayer's taxable years beginning after the date the vehicle was placed in service and ending before the end of the first 36 months after the vehicle was placed in service; and

    (C) The period ending at the end of the first 36 months after the vehicle was placed in service and beginning on the first day of the taxpayer's taxable year in which the end of those first 36 months falls.

    (iii) The following example illustrates this paragraph (m)(2).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-1(v)In lieu of using subdivision (iv) of this subparagraph for purposes of recomputing qualified investment, a taxpayer may, for the first recapture year (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(b) of this section) to which such subdivision (iv) would otherwise apply with respect to any mass asset account, recompute qualified investment on the basis of the difference between (a) the proper total qualified investment based on the percentage shown in column (5) of the table, and (b) the total qualified inv Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    In lieu of using subdivision (iv) of this subparagraph for purposes of recomputing qualified investment, a taxpayer may, for the first recapture year (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(b) of this section) to which such subdivision (iv) would otherwise apply with respect to any mass asset account, recompute qualified investment on the basis of the difference between (a) the proper total qualified investment based on the percentage shown in column (5) of the table, and (b) the total qualified investment actually claimed by the taxpayer for the year in which the property was placed in service.

    (vi) Subdivision (i) of this subparagraph shall not apply with respect to section 38 property to which an election under section 167(m) applies unless the taxpayer assigns actual retirements of such section 38 property for all taxable years to the same vintage account for purposes of section 47 and for purposes of computing the allowance for depreciation under section 167. The assignment of actual retirements of section 38 property for a taxable year to particular vintage accounts may be made on the basis of an appropriate mortality dispersion table (based on an acceptable sampling of the taxpayer's actual experience or other statistical or engineering techniques) or on the basis of a standard mortality dispersion table prescribed by the Commissioner. If the taxpayer assigns actual retirements for any taxable year to particular vintage accounts on the basis of such standard mortality dispersion table, actual retirements for all subsequent taxable years must be assigned to particular vintage accounts on the basis of such table. Actual retirements of section 38 property for a taxable year shall be assigned to particular vintage accounts by—

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-2“Disposition” and “cessation” Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) General rule—(1) “Disposition”. For purposes of this section and § 1.47-1 and §§ 1.47-3 through 1.47-6, the term “disposition” includes a sale in a sale-and-leaseback transaction, a transfer upon the foreclosure of a security interest and a gift, but such term does not include a mere transfer of title to a creditor upon creation of a security interest. See paragraph (g) of § 1.47-3 for treatment of certain sale-and-leaseback transactions.

    (2) “Cessation”. (i) A determination of whether section 38 property ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer must be made for each taxable year subsequent to the credit year. Thus, in each such taxable year the taxpayer must determine, as if such property were placed in service in such taxable year, whether such property would qualify as section 38 property (within the meaning of § 1.48-1) in the hands of the taxpayer for such taxable year.

    (ii) Section 38 property does not cease to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer in any taxable year subsequent to the credit year merely because under the taxpayer's depreciation practice no deduction for depreciation with respect to such property is allowable to the taxpayer for the taxable year, provided that the property continues to be used in the taxpayer's trade or business (or in the production of income) and otherwise qualifies as section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer.

    (iii) This subparagraph may be illustrated by the following examples:

    (b) Leased property—(1) In general. For purposes of paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1, generally the mere leasing of section 38 property by a lessor who took the basis of such property into account in computing his qualified investment for the credit year shall not be considered to be a disposition. However, in a case where a lease is treated as a sale for income tax purposes such transaction is considered to be a disposition. Leased section 38 property ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the lessor if, in any taxable year subsequent to the credit year, such property would not qualify as section 38 property (as defined in § 1.48-1) in the hands of the lessor, the lessee, or any sublessee. Thus, if, in a taxable year subsequent to the credit year, a lessee uses the property predominantly outside the United States, such property shall be considered to have ceased to be section 38 property with respect to the lessor.

    (2) Where lessor elects to treat lessee as purchaser. For purposes of paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1, if, under § 1.48-4, the lessor of new section 38 property made a valid election to treat the lessee as having purchased such property for purposes of the credit allowed by section 38, the following rules apply in determining whether such property is disposed of, or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the lessee:

    (i) Generally, a mere disposition by the lessor of property subject to a lease shall not be considered to be a disposition by the lessee.

    (ii) If the lessor makes a disposition of property subject to a lease to a person who may not, under § 1.48-4, make a valid election to treat the lessee as having purchased such property for purposes of the credit allowed by section 38 (such as a person described in paragraph (a)(5) of § 1.48-4), such property shall be considered to have ceased to be section 38 property with respect to the lessee on the date of such disposition.

    (iii) If a lease is terminated and the property is transferred by the lessee to the lessor or to any other person, such transfer shall be considered to be a disposition by the lessee.

    (iv) If the lessee actually purchases such property in the credit year or in a taxable year subsequent to the credit year, such purchase shall not be considered to be a disposition.

    (v) The property ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the lessee if in any taxable year subsequent to the credit year such property would not qualify as section 38 property (as defined in § 1.48-1) in the hands of the lessor, the lessee, or any sublessee. Thus, for example, if, in a taxable year subsequent to the credit year, a sublessee uses the property predominantly outside the United States, the property ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the lessee.

    (c) Reduction in basis of section 38 property—(1) General rule. If, in the credit year or in any taxable year subsequent to the credit year, the basis (or cost) of section 38 property is reduced, for example, as a result of a refund of part of the cost of the property, then such section 38 property shall be treated as having ceased to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer to the extent of the amount of such reduction in basis (or cost) on the date the refund which results in such reduction in basis (or cost) is received or accrued, except that for purposes of § 1.47-1(a) the actual useful life of the property treated as having ceased to be section 38 property shall be considered to be less than 3 years.

    (2) Example. Subparagraph (1) of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following example:

    (d) Retirements. A retirement of section 38 property, including a normal retirement (as defined in paragraph (b) of § 1.167(a)-8, relating to definition of normal and abnormal retirements), whether from a single asset account or a multiple asset account, and an abandonment, are dispositions for purposes of paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1.

    (e) Conversion of section 38 property to personal use. (1) If, for any taxable year subsequent to the credit year—

    (i) A deduction for depreciation is allowable to the taxpayer with respect to only a part of section 38 property because such property is partially devoted to personal use, and

    (ii) The part of the property (expressed as a percentage of its total basis (or cost)) with respect to which a deduction for depreciation is allowable for such taxable year is less than the part of the property with respect to which a deduction for depreciation was allowable in the credit year,

    then such property shall be considered as having ceased to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer to such extent. Further, property ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer to the extent that a deduction for depreciation thereon is disallowed under section 274 (relating to disallowance of certain entertainment, etc., expenses).

    (2) Examples. Subparagraph (1) of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following examples:

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-2(a)General rule—(1) “Disposition”. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    General rule—(1) “Disposition”. For purposes of this section and § 1.47-1 and §§ 1.47-3 through 1.47-6, the term “disposition” includes a sale in a sale-and-leaseback transaction, a transfer upon the foreclosure of a security interest and a gift, but such term does not include a mere transfer of title to a creditor upon creation of a security interest. See paragraph (g) of § 1.47-3 for treatment of certain sale-and-leaseback transactions.

    (2) “Cessation”. (i) A determination of whether section 38 property ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer must be made for each taxable year subsequent to the credit year. Thus, in each such taxable year the taxpayer must determine, as if such property were placed in service in such taxable year, whether such property would qualify as section 38 property (within the meaning of § 1.48-1) in the hands of the taxpayer for such taxable year.

    (ii) Section 38 property does not cease to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer in any taxable year subsequent to the credit year merely because under the taxpayer's depreciation practice no deduction for depreciation with respect to such property is allowable to the taxpayer for the taxable year, provided that the property continues to be used in the taxpayer's trade or business (or in the production of income) and otherwise qualifies as section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer.

    (iii) This subparagraph may be illustrated by the following examples:

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-2(b)Leased property—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Leased property—(1) In general. For purposes of paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1, generally the mere leasing of section 38 property by a lessor who took the basis of such property into account in computing his qualified investment for the credit year shall not be considered to be a disposition. However, in a case where a lease is treated as a sale for income tax purposes such transaction is considered to be a disposition. Leased section 38 property ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the lessor if, in any taxable year subsequent to the credit year, such property would not qualify as section 38 property (as defined in § 1.48-1) in the hands of the lessor, the lessee, or any sublessee. Thus, if, in a taxable year subsequent to the credit year, a lessee uses the property predominantly outside the United States, such property shall be considered to have ceased to be section 38 property with respect to the lessor.

    (2) Where lessor elects to treat lessee as purchaser. For purposes of paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1, if, under § 1.48-4, the lessor of new section 38 property made a valid election to treat the lessee as having purchased such property for purposes of the credit allowed by section 38, the following rules apply in determining whether such property is disposed of, or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the lessee:

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-2(c)Reduction in basis of section 38 property—(1) General rule. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Reduction in basis of section 38 property—(1) General rule. If, in the credit year or in any taxable year subsequent to the credit year, the basis (or cost) of section 38 property is reduced, for example, as a result of a refund of part of the cost of the property, then such section 38 property shall be treated as having ceased to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer to the extent of the amount of such reduction in basis (or cost) on the date the refund which results in such reduction in basis (or cost) is received or accrued, except that for purposes of § 1.47-1(a) the actual useful life of the property treated as having ceased to be section 38 property shall be considered to be less than 3 years.

    (2) Example. Subparagraph (1) of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following example:

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-2(d)Retirements. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Retirements. A retirement of section 38 property, including a normal retirement (as defined in paragraph (b) of § 1.167(a)-8, relating to definition of normal and abnormal retirements), whether from a single asset account or a multiple asset account, and an abandonment, are dispositions for purposes of paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-2(e)Conversion of section 38 property to personal use. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Conversion of section 38 property to personal use. (1) If, for any taxable year subsequent to the credit year—

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-2(i)§1.47-2(i) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    A deduction for depreciation is allowable to the taxpayer with respect to only a part of section 38 property because such property is partially devoted to personal use, and

    (ii) The part of the property (expressed as a percentage of its total basis (or cost)) with respect to which a deduction for depreciation is allowable for such taxable year is less than the part of the property with respect to which a deduction for depreciation was allowable in the credit year,

    then such property shall be considered as having ceased to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer to such extent. Further, property ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer to the extent that a deduction for depreciation thereon is disallowed under section 274 (relating to disallowance of certain entertainment, etc., expenses).

    (2) Examples. Subparagraph (1) of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following examples:

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-2(v)The property ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the lessee if in any taxable year subsequent to the credit year such property would not qualify as section 38 property (as defined in § 1. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    The property ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the lessee if in any taxable year subsequent to the credit year such property would not qualify as section 38 property (as defined in § 1.48-1) in the hands of the lessor, the lessee, or any sublessee. Thus, for example, if, in a taxable year subsequent to the credit year, a sublessee uses the property predominantly outside the United States, the property ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the lessee.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-3Exceptions to the application of § 1.47-1 Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) In general. Notwithstanding the provisions of § 1.47-2, relating to “disposition” and “cessation,” paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 shall not apply if paragraph (b) of this section (relating to transfers by reason of death), paragraph (c) of this section (relating to property destroyed by casualty), paragraph (d) of this section (relating to reselection of used section 38 property), paragraph (e) of this section (relating to transactions to which section 381(a) applies), paragraph (f) of this section (relating to mere change in form of conducting a trade or business), paragraph (g) of this section (relating to sale-and-leaseback transactions), or paragraph (h) of this section (relating to certain property replaced after Apr. 18, 1969) applies with respect to such disposition or cessation.

    (b) Transfers by reason of death—(1) General rule. Notwithstanding the provisions of § 1.47-2, relating to “disposition” and “cessation”, paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 shall not apply to a transfer of section 38 property by reason of the death of the taxpayer. Thus, for example, with respect to section 38 property held in joint tenancy, paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 shall not apply to the transfer of the deceased taxpayer's interest to the surviving joint tenant. If, under § 1.48-4, the lessor of new section 38 property made a valid election to treat the lessee as having purchased such property for purposes of the credit allowed by section 38, paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 does not apply if, by reason of the death of the lessee, there is a termination of the lease and transfer of the leased property to the lessor, or there is an assignment of the lease and transfer of the leased property to another person. Moreover, paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 does not apply to the transfer of a partner's interest in a partnership, a beneficiary's interest in an estate or trust, or shares of stock of a shareholder of an electing small business corporation (as defined in section 1371(b)) by reason of the death of such partner, beneficiary, or shareholder. Paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 shall not apply to property prior to his death even if the value of such gift is included in his gross estate for estate tax purposes (such as, a gift in contemplation of death under section 2035). The effect of this subparagraph is that any section 38 property held by a taxpayer at the time of his death is deemed to have been held by him for its entire estimated useful life.

    (2) Examples. Subparagraph (1) of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following examples:

    (c) Property destroyed by casualty—(1) Dispositions after April 18, 1969. Notwithstanding the provisions of § 1.47-2, relating to “disposition” and “cessation”, paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 shall not apply to property which, after April 18, 1969, and before August 16, 1971, is disposed of or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer on account of its destruction or damage by fire, storm, shipwreck, or other casualty, or by reason of its theft.

    (2) Dispositions before April 19, 1969. (i) In the case of property which, before April 19, 1969, is disposed of or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer on account of its destruction or damage by fire, storm, shipwreck or other casualty, or by reason of its theft, paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 shall apply except to the extent provided in subdivisions (ii) and (iii) of this subparagraph.

    (ii) Paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 shall not apply if—

    (a) Section 38 property is placed in service by the taxpayer to replace (within the meaning of paragraph (h) of § 1.46-3) the destroyed, damaged, or stolen property, and

    (b) The basis (or cost) of the section 38 property which is placed in service by the taxpayer to replace the destroyed, damaged, or stolen property is reduced under paragraph (h) of § 1.46-3.

    (iii) If property which would be section 38 property but for section 49 is placed in service by the taxpayer to replace the destroyed, damaged, or stolen property, then the provisions of paragraph (h) of this section (other than the requirement that the replacement take place within 6 months after the disposition) shall apply.

    (3) Examples. The provisions of subparagraph (2)(ii) of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following examples:

    (d) Reselection of used section 38 property—(1) Reselection. If—

    (i) Used section 38 property (as defined in § 1.48-3) the cost of which was taken into account in computing the taxpayer's qualified investment is disposed of, or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer, before the close of the estimated useful life which was taken into account in computing such qualified investment, and

    (ii) For the taxable year in which the property described in subdivision (i) of this subparagraph was placed in service, the sum of (a) the cost of used section 38 property placed in service by the taxpayer, and (b) the cost of used section 38 property apportioned to such taxpayer exceeded $50,000,

    then such taxpayer may treat the cost of any used section 38 property (regardless of its estimated useful life) which was not originally selected, under paragraph (c)(4) of § 1.48-3, to be taken into account in computing qualified investment for such taxable year (or previously reselected under this subparagraph) as having been selected (in accordance with the principles of paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of § 1.48-3) in place of the cost of the used section 38 property described in subdivision (i) of this subparagraph. Hereinafter such reselected property is referred to as “newly selected used section 38 property”. For purposes of this subparagraph, the cost of used section 38 property apportioned to a taxpayer means the sum of the cost of used section 38 property apportioned to him by a trust, estate, or electing small business corporation (as defined in section 1371(b)), and his share of the cost of partnership used section 38 property, with respect to the taxable year of such trust, estate, corporation or partnership ending with or within such taxpayer's taxable year. In the case of a taxpayer to whom paragraph (c)(2) of § 1.48-3 applied for the taxable year in which the property described in subdivision (i) of this subparagraph was placed in service, a $25,000 amount shall be substituted for the $50,000 amount referred to in subdivision (ii)(b) of this subparagraph, and in the case of a member of an affiliated group (as defined in subparagraph (6) of § 1.48-3(e)) the amount apportioned to such member under paragraph (e) of § 1.48-3 shall be substituted for such $50,000 amount.

    (2) Application of paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1. (i) If a taxpayer treats, under subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, the cost of any used section 38 property which was not originally selected as having been selected in place of the cost of used section 38 property described in subparagraph (1)(i) of this paragraph, then, not withstanding the provisions of § 1.47-2 (relating to “disposition” and “cessation”), paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 shall not apply to the property described in subparagraph (1)(i) of this paragraph to the extent of the cost of the newly selected used section 38 property.

    (ii) If the cost of the used section 38 property described in subparagraph (1)(i) of this paragraph exceeds the cost of the newly selected used section 38 property, then the property described in subparagraph (1)(i) of this paragraph shall cease to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer to the extent of such excess.

    (iii) If the newly selected used section 38 property is disposed of, or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer, before the close of the estimated useful life of the property described in subparagraph (1)(i) of this paragraph, then, unless he reselects other used section 38 property, paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 shall apply with respect to such newly selected used section 38 property. For purposes of recomputing qualified investment with respect to such newly selected used section 38 property the actual useful life shall be deemed to be the period beginning with the date on which the property described in subparagraph (1)(i) of this paragraph was placed in service by the taxpayer and ending with the date of the disposition or cessation with respect to such newly selected used section 38 property. See paragraph (c) of § 1.47-1, relating to date placed in service and date of disposition or cessation.

    (3) Information requirement. (i) If in any taxable year this paragraph applies to a taxpayer, such taxpayer shall attach to his income tax return for such taxable year a statement containing the information required by subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph.

    (ii) The statement referred to in subdivision (i) of this subparagraph shall contain the following information:

    (a) The taxpayer's name, address and taxpayer account number; and

    (b) With respect to the originally selected used section 38 property and the newly selected used section 38 property, the month and year placed in service, cost, and estimated useful life.

    (4) Examples. This paragraph may be illustrated by the following examples:

    (e) Transactions to which section 381(a) applies—(1) General rule. Notwithstanding the provisions of § 1.47-2, relating to “disposition” and “cessation”, paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 shall not apply to a disposition of section 38 property in a transaction to which section 381(a) (relating to carryovers in certain corporate acquisitions) applies. If the section 38 property described in the preceding sentence is disposed of, or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the acquiring corporation, before the close of the estimated useful life which was taken into account in computing the transferor corporation's qualified investment, then paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 shall apply to the acquiring corporation with respect to such section 38 property. For purposes of recomputing qualified investment with respect to such property its actual useful life shall be the period beginning with the date on which it was placed in service by the transferor corporation and ending with the date of the disposition by, or cessation with respect to, the acquiring corporation.

    (2) Examples. This paragraph may be illustrated by the following examples:

    (f) Mere change in form of conducting a trade or business—(1) General rule. (i) Notwithstanding the provisions of § 1.47-2, relating to “disposition” and “cessation”, paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 shall not apply to section 38 property which is disposed of, or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the taxpayer, before the close of the estimated useful life which was taken into account in computing the taxpayer's qualified investment by reason of a mere change in the form of conducting the trade or business in which such section 38 property is used provided that the conditions set forth in subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph are satisfied.

    (ii) The conditions referred to in subdivision (i) of this subparagraph are as follows:

    (a) The section 38 property described in subdivision (i) of this subparagraph is retained as section 38 property in the same trade or business,

    (b) The transferor (or in a case where the transferor is a partnership, estate, trust, or electing small business corporation, the partner, beneficiary, or shareholder) of such section 38 property retains a substantial interest in such trade or business,

    (c) Substantially all the assets (whether or not section 38 property) necessary to operate such trade or business are transferred to the transferee to whom such section 38 property is transferred, and

    (d) The basis of such section 38 property in the hands of the transferee is determined in whole or in part by reference to the basis of such section 38 property in the hands of the transferor. This subparagraph shall not apply to the transfer of section 38 property if paragraph (e) of this section, relating to transactions to which section 381 applies, applies with respect to such transfer.

    (2) Substantial interest. For purposes of this paragraph, a transferor (or in a case where the transferor is a partnership, estate, trust, or electing small business corporation, the partner, beneficiary, or shareholder) shall be considered as having retained a substantial interest in the trade or business only if, after the change in form, his interest in such trade or business—

    (i) Is substantial in relation to the total interest of all persons, or

    (ii) Is equal to or greater than his interest prior to the change in form.

    Thus, where a taxpayer owns a 5-percent interest in a partnership, and, after the incorporation of that partnership, the taxpayer retains at least a 5-percent interest in the corporation, the taxpayer will be considered as having retained a substantial interest in the trade or business as of the date of the change in form.

    (3) Property held for the production of income. Subparagraph (1)(i) of this paragraph applies to section 38 property held for the production of income (within the meaning of section 167(a)(2)) as well as to section 38 property used in a trade or business.

    (4) Leased property. In a case where a lessor of new section 38 property made a valid election, under § 1.48-4, to treat the lessee as having purchased such property for purposes of the credit allowed by section 38, in determining whether subparagraph (1)(i) of this paragraph applies to an assignment of the lease and transfer of possession of such property, the condition contained in subparagraph (1)(ii)(d) of this paragraph is not applicable.

    (5) Disposition or cessation. (i) If section 38 property described in subparagraph (1)(i) of this paragraph is disposed of by the transferee, or otherwise ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the transferee, before the close of the estimated useful life which was taken into account in computing the qualified investment of the transferor (or in a case where the transferor is a partnership, estate, trust, or electing small business corporation, the qualified investment of the partners, beneficiaries, or shareholders) then under paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 such property ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the transferor (or such partners, beneficiaries, or shareholders), and a recapture determination shall be made with respect to such property. For purposes of recomputing qualified investment with respect to such property, the actual useful life shall be the period beginning with the date on which it was placed in service by the transferor and ending with the date of the disposition by, or cessation with respect to, the transferee.

    (ii) If in any taxable year the transferor (or in a case where the transferor is a partnership, estate, trust, or electing small business corporation, the partner, beneficiary, or shareholder) of the section 38 property described in subparagraph (1)(i) of this paragraph does not retain a substantial interest in the trade or business directly or indirectly (through ownership in other entities provided that such other entities' bases in such interest are determined in whole or in part by reference to the basis of such interest in the hands of the transferor) then, under paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1, such property ceases to be section 38 property with respect to the transferor and he (or the partner, beneficiary, or shareholder) shall make a recapture determination. For purposes of recomputing qualified investment with respect to property described in this subdivision, its actual useful life shall be the period beginning with the date on which it was placed in service by the transferor and ending with the first date on which the transferor (or the partner, beneficiary, or shareholder) does not retain a substantial interest in the trade or business. Any taxpayer who seeks to establish his interest in a trade or business under the rule of this subdivision shall maintain adequate records to demonstrate his indirect interest in such trade or business after any such transfer or transfers.

    (iii) In making a recapture determination under this subparagraph there shall be taken into account any prior recapture determinations with respect to the transferor in connection with the same property.

    (iv) Notwithstanding subparagraph (1) of this paragraph and subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph in the case of a mere change in the form of a trade or business, if the interest of a taxpayer in the trade or business is reduced but such taxpayer has retained a substantial interest in such trade or business, paragraph (a)(2) of § 1.47-4 (relating to electing small business corporations), paragraph (a)(2) of § 1.47-5 (relating to estates or trusts) or paragraph (a)(2) of § 1.47-6 (relating to partnerships) shall apply, as the case may be.

    (6) Examples. This paragraph may be illustrated by the following examples in each of which it is assumed that the transfer satisfies the conditions of subparagraphs (1)(ii) (a), (c), and (d) of this paragraph.

    (g) Sale-and-leaseback transactions—(1) In general. Notwithstanding the provisions of § 1.47-2, relating to “disposition” and “cessation”, paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 shall not apply where section 38 property is disposed of and as part of the same transaction is leased back to the vendor even though gain or loss is recognized to the vendor-lessee and the property ceases to be subject to depreciation in his hands. If paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 applies with respect to such property subsequent to the transaction, the actual useful life shall begin with the date on which such property was first placed in service by the vendor-lessee as owner.

    (2) Special rule for progress expenditure property. The sale and leaseback (or agreement or contract to leaseback) of progress expenditure property (including any contract rights to the property), in general, will be treated as a cessation described in section 47(a)(3)(A) with respect to the seller-lessee. However, a sale and leaseback (or agreement or contract to leaseback) will not be treated as a cessation to the extent qualified investment passed through to the lessee under section 48(d) in the year the property is placed in service equals or exceeds qualified progress expenditures for the property taken into account by the lessee. If a sale-leaseback transaction is treated as a cessation, qualified investment must be reduced and the credit recomputed, beginning with the most recent credit year (i.e., the most recent year property is taken into account in computing qualified investment under § 1.46-3 or 1.46-5). The amount of the reduction is the amount, if any, by which qualified progress expenditures taken into account by the lessee in all prior years exceeds qualified investment passed through to the lessee under section 48(d). This paragraph (g)(2) does not apply to any progress expenditure property that has been placed in service by a vendor-lessee (as described in paragraph (g)(1) of this section) prior to a sale-leaseback of that property in a transaction described in paragraph (g)(1) of this section.

    (h) Certain property replaced after April 18, 1969—(1) In general. (i) If section 38 property is disposed of and property which is, for purposes of section 1033 and the regulations thereunder, similar or related in service or use to the property disposed of and which would be section 38 property but for the application of section 49 is placed in service to replace the property disposed of, the increase in income tax and adjustment of investment credit carryovers and carrybacks resulting from the recomputation under paragraph (a) of § 1.47-1 shall be reduced (but not below zero) by the credit that would be allowed for the qualified investment of the replacement property (determined as if such property were section 38 property). The preceding sentence shall not apply unless the replacement takes place within 6 months after the disposition. If property otherwise qualifies as replacement property, it is immaterial that it is placed in service (for example, to undergo testing) before the replaced property is disposed of. The assignment by the taxpayer in his return of an estimated useful life to the replacement property in computing its qualified investment will be considered a representation by the taxpayer that he expects to retain the replacement property for its entire estimated useful life. If such property is disposed of before the end of such life, then the circumstances surrounding the replacement will be examined to determine whether the taxpayer's representation was in good faith and, if appropriate, the qualified investment of the replacement property will be recomputed for the year of replacement using the actual useful life of such property.

    (ii) The provisions of subdivision (i) of this subparagraph may be illustrated by the following example:

    (2) Leased property. Property disposed of may be replaced with property leased from another, provided (i) an election with respect to the newly leased property could be made under section 48(d) but for section 49, and (ii) the lessee obtains the lessor's written statement that he will not claim such property as replacement property under this paragraph. The statement of the lessor shall contain the information specified in subdivisions (i) through (vii) of § 1.48-4(f)(1) and the statement (or a copy thereof) shall be retained in the records of the lessor and the lessee for a period of at least 3 years after the property is transferred to the lessee.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-3(a)§1.47-3(a) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    The section 38 property described in subdivision (i) of this subparagraph is retained as section 38 property in the same trade or business,

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-3(b)§1.47-3(b) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    The transferor (or in a case where the transferor is a partnership, estate, trust, or electing small business corporation, the partner, beneficiary, or shareholder) of such section 38 property retains a substantial interest in such trade or business,

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-3(c)§1.47-3(c) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Substantially all the assets (whether or not section 38 property) necessary to operate such trade or business are transferred to the transferee to whom such section 38 property is transferred, and

  • Treas. Reg. §1.47-3(d)The basis of such section 38 property in the hands of the transferee is determined in whole or in part by reference to the basis of such section 38 property in the hands of the transferor. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    The basis of such section 38 property in the hands of the transferee is determined in whole or in part by reference to the basis of such section 38 property in the hands of the transferor. This subparagraph shall not apply to the transfer of section 38 property if paragraph (e) of this section, relating to transactions to which section 381 applies, applies with respect to such transfer.

    (2) Substantial interest. For purposes of this paragraph, a transferor (or in a case where the transferor is a partnership, estate, trust, or electing small business corporation, the partner, beneficiary, or shareholder) shall be considered as having retained a substantial interest in the trade or business only if, after the change in form, his interest in such trade or business—

110 Citing Cases

Shilgevorkyan v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2023-12 · 2023

§ 47-3419(A) (West 2022). If an accommodation party ends up paying on the instrument, that party may seek reimbursement from the primary obligor and may enforce the instrument, but the party does not have a right to the underlying property. Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 47-3419(E) (West 2022). From the testimony we reach the conclusion that Artur was nev

ent disallowed petitioners' special allowance for depreciation because the solar equipment was not "Section 179 property". Respondent disallowed petitioners' energy credit because their expenses did "not qualify for the Rehabilitation Credit" under section 47. Given that petitioners did not claim a section 179 deduction or a section 47 rehabilitation credit on their return, respondent's references to these sections were in error. Respondent now acknowledges that sections 179 and 47 are inapplica

Under - 71 - [*71] Federal tax law, interest in transferee liability cases is calculated in two separate periods, prenotice and postnotice; the applicable notice is the notice of transferee liability. Prejudgment interest (a State law term) includes prenotice interest and a portion ofthe postnotice interest. The postnotice interest

Under - 71 - [*71] Federal tax law, interest in transferee liability cases is calculated in two separate periods, prenotice and postnotice; the applicable notice is the notice of transferee liability. Prejudgment interest (a State law term) includes prenotice interest and a portion ofthe postnotice interest. The postnotice interest

Under - 71 - [*71] Federal tax law, interest in transferee liability cases is calculated in two separate periods, prenotice and postnotice; the applicable notice is the notice of transferee liability. Prejudgment interest (a State law term) includes prenotice interest and a portion ofthe postnotice interest. The postnotice interest

Under - 71 - [*71] Federal tax law, interest in transferee liability cases is calculated in two separate periods, prenotice and postnotice; the applicable notice is the notice of transferee liability. Prejudgment interest (a State law term) includes prenotice interest and a portion ofthe postnotice interest. The postnotice interest

Dictionary 1160-1161. While "noscitur a sociis" is most commonly applied to lists ofthree or more terms, it may apply "when two or more words are grouped together." 2A Norman J. Singer & -25- J.D. Shambie Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, sec. 47:16, at 359 (7th ed. 2014). Because "political subdivision" appears in the same clause as "agency or instrumentality," petitioner argues that the latter phrase should be given a limiting construction that essentially equates it to the former. T

47-05-02.1 (1999 & Supp. 2013) provided in pertinent part: Real property easements * * * which become binding after July 1, 1977, shall be subject to the requirements ofthis section. These requirements are deemed a part ofany agreement for such interests in real property whether or not printed in a document ofagreement. * * * * * * * 2. The du

47-05-02.1 (1999 & Supp. 2013) provided in pertinent part: Real property easements * * * which become binding after July 1, 1977, shall be subject to the requirements ofthis section. These requirements are deemed a part ofany agreement for such interests in real property whether or not printed in a document ofagreement. * * * * * * * 2. The du

For increase in tax due to the application ofsection 47, see §1.1502-3(f).

Wachter v. Commissioner 142 T.C. 140 · 2014

47-05-02.1 (1999 & Supp. 2013) provided in pertinent part: Real property easements * * * which become binding after July 1, 1977, shall be subject to the requirements of this section. These requirements are deemed a part of any agreement for such interests in real property whether or not printed in a document of agreement. * * * * * * * 2. The

For increase in tax due to the application of section 47, see §1.1502-3(1).

k’s Law Dictionary 1160-1161. While noscitur a sociis is most commonly applied to lists of three or more terms, it may apply “when two or more words are grouped together.” 2A Norman J. Singer & J.D. Shambie Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, sec. 47:16, at 359 (7th ed. 2014). Because “political subdivision” appears in the same clause as “agency or instrumentality,” petitioner argues that the latter phrase should be given a limiting construction that essentially equates it to the former.

eral resources." Id. at 307. While "n scitur a sociis" is most commonly applied to lists ofthree or more terms, it may apply "when two or more words are grouped together." 2A Norman J. Singer & J.D. Shambie Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, sec. 47:16, at 347 (7th ed. 2007). Here, the term "for cause" is susceptible to a wide variety ofnkeanings under private contracts. Applyingthe "noscitur a sociis" canon, we can surmise that the Department ofthe Treasury, by associating the phrase "f

Cryer v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2013-69 · 2013

47:42A (2001), wlÅich was in effect during the tax years 1994 through 2001, provided that "Gross income includes gains, profits, and income derived from salaries, wages, or compensation for personal service * * * or from professions, vocations, trades, businesses * * *[and] from interest * * * or the transaction ofany business carried on for g

Gassaway v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2013-13 · 2013

part ofthe witness's account ofthe background and circumstances ofa material transaction, which as a matter ofhuman experience he would not have been mistaken about ifhis story were true." Carter, 953 F.2d at 1458 n. 3 (quoting McCormick on Evidence § 47, at 112 (E. Cleary ed., 3d ed. 1984)). Finally, Rule 403 does not provide for a time limit like Rule 609 does. * * * * * Rule 403 requires the court to weigh the probative value and the prejudicial effect. This circuit has consistently applied t

47:lA-1, et seq., and requesting information as to work performed on the 265 Cold Soil property, revealed that construction permits for the dwelling house ofthat property had not been issued until late 2009. The lack of evidence on fair rental value ofthe 265 Cold Soil property, coupled with the testimony ofrespondent's revenue agent that the

Austin v. Commissioner 141 T.C. 551 · 2013

ral resources.” Id. at 307. While “noscitur a sociis” is most commonly applied to lists of three or more terms, it may apply “when two or more words are grouped together.” 2A Norman J. Singer & J.D. Shambie Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, sec. 47:16, at 347 (7th ed. 2007). Here, the term “for cause” is susceptible to a wide variety of meanings under private contracts. Applying the “noscitur a sociis” canon, we can surmise that the Department of the Treasury, by associating the phrase

taxpayer has the burden ofpersuading the Court that the IRS's determination is mcorrect. Id. at 447. The burden ofpersuasion is satisfied ifa preponderance oftlie evidence supports the fact asserted. John Jay McKelvay, Handbook ofthe Law ofEvidence, sec. 47, at 96 (5th ed. 1944). As -6- explained below, we find that Ensyc has shown by a preponderance ofthe evidence that it had reasonable cause for not timely filing the return. We must first resolve the parties' dispute about whether Jessup maile

rms 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, for 2000, 2001, and 2002, Historic Boardwalk Hall claimed qualified rehabilitation expenditures and allocated those expenditures to PB, allowing PB to claim historic rehabilitation tax credits pursuant to sec. 47, I.R.C. R issued an FPAA asserting alternative grounds for denying PB the claimed rehabilitation tax credits. R's overarching argument is that NJSEA sold the rehabilitation tax credits to PB for a fee. R also SERVED JAN -3 2011 - 2 - argues t

Because the East Hall was a historic structure, this rehabilitation project had the potential to earn section 47 historic rehabilitation credits.

Billy L. & Renetta J. Evans, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2010-207 · 2010

47-2853.10(a) (12) (LexisNexis 007) and Mayor's Order 2000-70, dated May 2, 2000.a Their A court may take judicial notice of appropriate adjudicative facts at any stage in a proceeding, whether or not the notice is requested by the parties. See Fed. R. Evid. 201(c), (f); see also United States v. Harris, 331 F.2d 600, 601 (6th Cir. 1964) (expl

Nussdorf v. Commissioner 129 T.C. No. 5 · 2007

- 23 - We hold that the determination set forth in paragraph 8 of the respective notices of deficiency that respondent issued to petitioners in these cases relates to certain partnership items described above .

Nussdorf v. Commissioner 129 T.C. 30 · 2007

For example, it may be necessary to determine whether contribution of the property causes recapture by the contributing partner of the investment credit under section 47 in certain circumstances in which that determination is irrelevant to the partnership.

supported by the “rule of the last antecedent”, under which the clause “which was irrevocable on September 25, 1985” should be construed to relate to the word “trust” and not to the word “transfer”. See 2A Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, sec. 47:33 (6th ed. 2000); see also Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 26 (2003). That conclusion also is supported by the fact that Congress apparently drafted the general rule with a broad and precise brush, providing explicitly that the GST “shall no

Estate of Gerson v. Commissioner 127 T.C. 139 · 2006

supported by the “rule of the last antecedent”, under which the clause “which was irrevocable on September 25, 1985” should be construed to relate to the word “trust” and not to the word “transfer”. See 2A Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, sec. 47:33 (6th ed. 2000); see also Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 26 (2003). That conclusion also is supported by the fact that Congress apparently drafted the general rule with a broad and precise brush, providing explicitly that the GST “shall no

47-2-105 (1963); Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. sec. 2.105 (West 1967). Instead, a present sale of nonexisting property or goods operates as a contractual obligation to buy and sell property at a later date. A contractual right to purchase nonexisting property in the future is not a property interest in the underlying property. See Hoven v. Commis

A.J. Concrete Pumping, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2001-42 · 2001

The regulations under section 47 raise rebuttable presumptions that the facts are adverse to the taxpayer who fails to maintain the required records.

Such other information would include those factors used in determining whether there is recapture under section 47 by the contributing shareholder of the general business credit because of the contribution of property in circumstances in which that determination is irrelevant to the corporation.

Chester F. & Faye L. Sidell, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-301 · 1999

According to petitioners, denial of the rehabilitation credit defeats the express legislative policy goal underlying the enactment of section 47; namely, to preserve historic landmarks and to provide an economic stimulus to areas susceptible to abandonment.

Roy E. & Linda Day, Petitioner 108 T.C. No. 2 · 1997

(c) Regular Tax.-- (1) In general.--For purposes of this section, the term "regular tax" means the regular tax liability for the taxable year (as defined in section 26(b)) reduced by the foreign tax credit allowable under section 27(a) and the section 936 credit allowable under section 27(b).

To distinguish between them would deny economic reality. See Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465, 470, 55 S.Ct.

Day v. Commissioner 108 T.C. 11 · 1997

Such term shall not include any tax imposed by section 402(e) and shall not include any increase in tax under section 47 or subsection (j) or (k) of section 42.

Section 47 sets out two prongs for the “mere change in the form” test — first, a continuing trade or business, and second, a retained substantial interest. The transactions herein clearly satisfy the continuing trade or business requirement.! However, after the transaction in question, petitioner no longer had any interest in its former glass busin

Bennett v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1996-502 · 1996

position or occupation", is to no avail. Our analysis is necessarily governed by the meaning of the operative term as it is specifically defined by Congress and not as it may be more popularly construed. 2A Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction sec. 47.07, at 151, (5th ed. 1992). As we have already discussed, section 4980A(e)(1)(A) defines the term "retirement distribution" to mean the amount distributed during the taxable year under a qualified employer plan with respect to which the indiv

Jerome J. & Beatrice A. Mack, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1995-482 · 1995

47-10-01 (1978). The requisites of an executory contract for the purchase and sale of real property, also known as a contract for deed, are that there - 20 - should be: (1) Parties capable of contracting; (2) the consent of the parties; (3) a lawful object; and (4) sufficient cause of consideration. N.D. Cent. Code sec. 9-01-02 (1987); Gerhar

Scott L. Reed & Stacy N. Reed, Petitioners T.C. Memo. 2026-64 · 2026 · T.C.
Nalle v. Commissioner 99 T.C. 187 · 1992
Jacobson v. Commissioner 96 T.C. 577 · 1991
Rome I, Ltd. v. Commissioner 96 T.C. 697 · 1991
Walt Disney Inc. v. Commissioner 97 T.C. 221 · 1991
Woody v. Commissioner 95 T.C. 193 · 1990
Brown v. Commissioner 93 T.C. 736 · 1989
Tandy Corp. v. Commissioner 92 T.C. 1165 · 1989
McDonald v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 293 · 1987
Estate of Dancy v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 550 · 1987
Segel v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 816 · 1987
Southern v. Commissioner 87 T.C. 49 · 1986
Skripak v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 285 · 1985
McClelland v. Commissioner 83 T.C. 958 · 1984
Scar v. Commissioner 81 T.C. 855 · 1983
Loewen v. Commissioner 76 T.C. 90 · 1981
Zuanich v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 428 · 1981
Benak v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 1213 · 1981
Brown v. Commissioner 75 T.C. 172 · 1980
Griffith v. Commissioner 73 T.C. 933 · 1980
Austin Co. v. Commissioner 71 T.C. 955 · 1979
Millar v. Commissioner 67 T.C. 656 · 1977
R. M. Smith, Inc. v. Commissioner 69 T.C. 317 · 1977
Bremer v. Commissioner 66 T.C. 360 · 1976
Goldstone v. Commissioner 65 T.C. 113 · 1975
Shaheen v. Commissioner 62 T.C. 359 · 1974
Blevins v. Commissioner 61 T.C. 547 · 1974
Mueller v. Commissioner 60 T.C. 36 · 1973
Hammerstrom v. Commissioner 60 T.C. 167 · 1973
Aboussie v. Commissioner 60 T.C. 549 · 1973
Soares v. Commissioner 50 T.C. 909 · 1968
Krueger v. Commissioner 48 T.C. 824 · 1967
Marcello v. Commissioner 43 T.C. 168 · 1964
Potter v. Commissioner 27 T.C. 200 · 1956
Berry v. Commissioner 26 T.C. 351 · 1956
George v. Commissioner 26 T.C. 396 · 1956
Virginia Duncan v. Rob Bonta · Cir.
Custodia Bank v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors · Cir.
Robert A. Sears v. Joseph H. Badami 734 F.3d 810 · Cir.
Skiba v. Laher 496 F.3d 279 · Cir.
Leckey v. Stefano 501 F.3d 212 · Cir.
Louisiana Department of Revenue & Taxation v. Lewis (In Re Lewis) 199 F.3d 249 · Cir.
Sidell v. Commissioner 225 F.3d 103 · Cir.
Virginia Historic Tax Credit Fund 2001 LP v. Commissioner 639 F.3d 129 · Cir.
Ellis v. J.R.'s Country Stores, Inc. 779 F.3d 1184 · Cir.
Aeroquip-Vickers v. CIR · Cir.
Lee v. Atty Gen USA · Cir.
Skiba v. Laher · Cir.
James L. Thom v. United States 283 F.3d 939 · Cir.
United States v. Stevens · Cir.
Jay Isaac Hollis v. Loretta Lynch 827 F.3d 436 · Cir.
Leathers v. Leathers 856 F.3d 729 · Cir.
Marilyn Marshall v. Denise Blake 885 F.3d 1065 · Cir.
Marilyn Marshall v. Denise Blake · Cir.
Andrea Byers v. IRS 963 F.3d 548 · Cir.
Maldonado v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation 493 F.3d 521 · Cir.
James L. Thom Jean M. Thom v. United States of America, Leroy W. Thom Jean E. Thom v. United States of America, David W. Thom Janis Thom v. United States of America, Tom Thom Ladena Thom v. United States 283 F.3d 939 · Cir.
Kong v. Scully 341 F.3d 1132 · Cir.
Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc. And Subsidiaries, F/k/a Trinova Corp. And Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 347 F.3d 173 · Cir.
Historic Boardwalk Hall, LLC v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 694 F.3d 425 · Cir.
Department of Texas v. Texas Lottery Commission 698 F.3d 239 · Cir.
Renaldo White v. Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Company 104 F.4th 1182 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.