§534 — Burden of proof

48 citing cases

(a)General rule

In any proceeding before the Tax Court involving a notice of deficiency based in whole or in part on the allegation that all or any part of the earnings and profits have been permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business, the burden of proof with respect to such allegation shall—

(1)

if notification has not been sent in accordance with subsection (b), be on the Secretary, or

(2)

if the taxpayer has submitted the statement described in subsection (c), be on the Secretary with respect to the grounds set forth in such statement in accordance with the provisions of such subsection.

(b)Notification by Secretary

Before mailing the notice of deficiency referred to in subsection (a), the Secretary may send by certified mail or registered mail a notification informing the taxpayer that the proposed notice of deficiency includes an amount with respect to the accumulated earnings tax imposed by section 531.

(c)Statement by taxpayer

Within such time (but not less than 30 days) after the mailing of the notification described in subsection (b) as the Secretary may prescribe by regulations, the taxpayer may submit a statement of the grounds (together with facts sufficient to show the basis thereof) on which the taxpayer relies to establish that all or any part of the earnings and profits have not been permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business.

(d)Jeopardy assessment

If pursuant to section 6861(a) a jeopardy assessment is made before the mailing of the notice of deficiency referred to in subsection (a), for purposes of this section such notice of deficiency shall, to the extent that it informs the taxpayer that such deficiency includes the accumulated earnings tax imposed by section 531, constitute the notification described in subsection (b), and in that event the statement described in subsection (c) may be included in the taxpayer’s petition to the Tax Court.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.534-1Burden of proof as to unreasonable accumulations generally Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    For purposes of applying the presumption provided for in section 533(a) and in determining the extent of the accumulated earnings credit under section 535(c)(1), the burden of proof with respect to an allegation by the Commissioner that all or any part of the earnings and profits of the corporation have been permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business may vary under section 534 as between litigation in the Tax Court and that in any other court. In case of a proceeding in a court other than the Tax Court, see paragraph (b) of § 1.533-1.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.534-2Burden of proof as to unreasonable accumulations in cases before the Tax Court Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) Burden of proof on Commissioner. Under the general rule provided in section 534(a), in any proceeding before the Tax Court involving a notice of deficiency based in whole or in part on the allegation that all or any part of the earnings and profits have been permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business, the burden of proof with respect to such allegation is upon the Commissioner if:

    (1) A notification, as provided for in section 534(b) and paragraph (c) of this section, has not been sent to the taxpayer; or

    (2) A notification, as provided for in section 534(b) and paragraph (c) of this section, has been sent to the taxpayer and, in response to such notification, the taxpayer has submitted a statement, as provided in section 534(c) and paragraph (d) of this section, setting forth the ground or grounds (together with facts sufficient to show the basis thereof) on which it relies to establish that all or any part of its earnings and profits have not been permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business. However, the burden of proof in the latter case is upon the Commissioner only with respect to the relevant ground or grounds set forth in the statement submitted by the taxpayer, and only if such ground or grounds are supported by facts (contained in the statement) sufficient to show the basis thereof.

    (b) Burden of proof on the taxpayer. The burden of proof in a Tax Court proceeding with respect to an allegation that all or any part of the earnings and profits have been permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business is upon the taxpayer if:

    (1) A notification, as provided for in section 534(b) and paragraph (c) of this section, has been sent to the taxpayer and the taxpayer has not submitted a statement, in response to such notification, as provided in section 534(c) and paragraph (d) of this section; or

    (2) A statement has been submitted by the taxpayer in response to such notification, but the ground or grounds on which the taxpayer relies are not relevant to the allegation or, if relevant, the statement does not contain facts sufficient to show the basis thereof.

    (c) Notification to the taxpayer. Under section 534(b) a notification informing the taxpayer that the proposed notice of deficiency includes an amount with respect to the accumulated earnings tax imposed by section 531 may be sent by registered mail (or by certified or registered mail, if the notification is mailed after September 2, 1958) to the taxpayer at any time before the mailing of the notice of deficiency in the case of a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1953, and ending after August 16, 1954. See § 1.534-4 for rules relating to taxable years subject to the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. See section 534(d) and § 1.534-3 with respect to a notification in the case of a jeopardy assessment.

    (d) Statement by taxpayer. (1) A taxpayer who has received a notification, as provided in section 534(b) and paragraph (c) of this section, that the proposed notice of deficiency includes an amount with respect to the accumulated earnings tax imposed by section 531, may, under section 534(c), submit a statement that all or any part of the earnings and profits of the corporation have not been permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business. Such statement shall set forth the ground or grounds (together with facts sufficient to show the basis thereof) on which the taxpayer relies to establish that there has been no accumulation of earnings and profits beyond the reasonable needs of the business. See paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section for rules concerning the effect of the statement with respect to burden of proof. See §§ 1.537-1 to 1.537-3, inclusive, relating to reasonable needs of the business.

    (2) The taxpayer's statement, under section 534(c) and this paragraph, must be submitted to the Internal Revenue office which issued the notification (referred to in section 534(b) and paragraph (c) of this section) within 60 days after the mailing of such notification. If the taxpayer is unable, for good cause, to submit the statement within such 60-day period, an additional period not exceeding 30 days may be granted upon receipt in the Internal Revenue office concerned (before the expiration of the 60-day period provided herein) of a request from the taxpayer, setting forth the reasons for such request. See section 534(d) and § 1.534-3 with respect to a statement in the case of a jeopardy assessment.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.534-2(a)Burden of proof on Commissioner. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Burden of proof on Commissioner. Under the general rule provided in section 534(a), in any proceeding before the Tax Court involving a notice of deficiency based in whole or in part on the allegation that all or any part of the earnings and profits have been permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business, the burden of proof with respect to such allegation is upon the Commissioner if:

    (1) A notification, as provided for in section 534(b) and paragraph (c) of this section, has not been sent to the taxpayer; or

    (2) A notification, as provided for in section 534(b) and paragraph (c) of this section, has been sent to the taxpayer and, in response to such notification, the taxpayer has submitted a statement, as provided in section 534(c) and paragraph (d) of this section, setting forth the ground or grounds (together with facts sufficient to show the basis thereof) on which it relies to establish that all or any part of its earnings and profits have not been permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business. However, the burden of proof in the latter case is upon the Commissioner only with respect to the relevant ground or grounds set forth in the statement submitted by the taxpayer, and only if such ground or grounds are supported by facts (contained in the statement) sufficient to show the basis thereof.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.534-2(b)Burden of proof on the taxpayer. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Burden of proof on the taxpayer. The burden of proof in a Tax Court proceeding with respect to an allegation that all or any part of the earnings and profits have been permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business is upon the taxpayer if:

    (1) A notification, as provided for in section 534(b) and paragraph (c) of this section, has been sent to the taxpayer and the taxpayer has not submitted a statement, in response to such notification, as provided in section 534(c) and paragraph (d) of this section; or

    (2) A statement has been submitted by the taxpayer in response to such notification, but the ground or grounds on which the taxpayer relies are not relevant to the allegation or, if relevant, the statement does not contain facts sufficient to show the basis thereof.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.534-2(c)Notification to the taxpayer. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Notification to the taxpayer. Under section 534(b) a notification informing the taxpayer that the proposed notice of deficiency includes an amount with respect to the accumulated earnings tax imposed by section 531 may be sent by registered mail (or by certified or registered mail, if the notification is mailed after September 2, 1958) to the taxpayer at any time before the mailing of the notice of deficiency in the case of a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1953, and ending after August 16, 1954. See § 1.534-4 for rules relating to taxable years subject to the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. See section 534(d) and § 1.534-3 with respect to a notification in the case of a jeopardy assessment.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.534-2(d)Statement by taxpayer. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Statement by taxpayer. (1) A taxpayer who has received a notification, as provided in section 534(b) and paragraph (c) of this section, that the proposed notice of deficiency includes an amount with respect to the accumulated earnings tax imposed by section 531, may, under section 534(c), submit a statement that all or any part of the earnings and profits of the corporation have not been permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business. Such statement shall set forth the ground or grounds (together with facts sufficient to show the basis thereof) on which the taxpayer relies to establish that there has been no accumulation of earnings and profits beyond the reasonable needs of the business. See paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section for rules concerning the effect of the statement with respect to burden of proof. See §§ 1.537-1 to 1.537-3, inclusive, relating to reasonable needs of the business.

    (2) The taxpayer's statement, under section 534(c) and this paragraph, must be submitted to the Internal Revenue office which issued the notification (referred to in section 534(b) and paragraph (c) of this section) within 60 days after the mailing of such notification. If the taxpayer is unable, for good cause, to submit the statement within such 60-day period, an additional period not exceeding 30 days may be granted upon receipt in the Internal Revenue office concerned (before the expiration of the 60-day period provided herein) of a request from the taxpayer, setting forth the reasons for such request. See section 534(d) and § 1.534-3 with respect to a statement in the case of a jeopardy assessment.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.534-3Jeopardy assessments in Tax Court cases Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    In the case of a jeopardy assessment, a notice of deficiency is required to be sent to the taxpayer by registered mail (or by certified or registered mail, if the notice is mailed after September 2, 1958) within 60 days after the making of the assessment. See section 6861. If a jeopardy assessment is made before the mailing of the deficiency notice, then in the case of a proceeding in the Tax Court, if the deficiency notice informs the taxpayer that an amount of accumulated earnings tax is included in the deficiency, such notice shall constitute the notification provided for in section 534(b) and paragraph (c) of § 1.534-2. Under such circumstances the statement described in section 534(c) and paragraph (d) of § 1.534-2 shall instead be included in the taxpayer's petition to the Tax Court, if the taxpayer desires to submit such statement. See paragraph (b) of § 1.534-2, relating to burden of proof on the taxpayer.

48 Citing Cases

c. v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 1566, 1574 (1970) (citing Beim Co. v. Landy, 113 F.2d 897, 900 (8th Cir. 1940)). The burden of proof as to whether a corporation constitutes a mere holding company is placed on the corporation and may not be shifted under section 534. See Rule 142(a); H.C. Cockrell Warehouse Corp. v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 1036, 1045-1046 (1979).5 5 It appears that with certain limitations a shift in the (continued...) - 18 - In Dahlem Found., Inc. v. Commissioner, supra, we concluded

Section 534 lists two situations in which the Commissioner bears the burden of proving that earnings have accumulated beyond the reasonable needs of the business. First, the Commissioner bears the burden of proof when the Commissioner fails to notify the corporation before issuing a notice of deficiency to it that the notice of deficiency includes

Knight Furniture Co., Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2001-19 · 2001

Pursuant to section 534, the burden of proof was shifted to respondent to demonstrate that petitioner’s accumulation of earnings and profits for stockholder redemptions of stock and business expansion plans was beyond petitioner’s reasonable needs.

WELLS, Judge: The instant case is before the Court on respondent's motion pursuant to Rule 142(e) to shift the burden of proof to petitioner to the limited extent set forth in section 534 (a) (2) .¹ ¹ Unless otherwise indicated., all section and Code references are to the Internal Revenue Code as in effect for the taxable years before the Court, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Eyefull Incorporated, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1996-238 · 1996

Section 534 provides that under certain circumstances the burden of proof with respect to the question whether earnings and profits have accumulated beyond the reasonable needs of the business may be shifted to the Government. The parties have stipulated that petitioner continues to bear the burden of proof. Rule 142(a). Working Capital A corporati

Windsor Production Corporation, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1995-556 · 1995

In that case we said: [The Commissioner] admits that part of section 534's function is to "encourag[e] the Internal Revenue Service to be more deliberate than it had been in the past." Such deliberation can result only if respondent reads and considers a taxpayer's section 534(c) response before issuing a notice of deficiency, and we are confident that Congress intended for respondent to do just that.

Hughes, Inc. v. Commissioner 90 T.C. 1 · 1988
Rutter v. Commissioner 81 T.C. 937 · 1983
Doncaster v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 334 · 1981
Llorente v. Commissioner 74 T.C. 260 · 1980
Morris v. Commissioner 73 T.C. 285 · 1979
Estate of Lucas v. Commissioner 71 T.C. 838 · 1979
Stuit v. Commissioner 54 T.C. 580 · 1970
Montgomery Co. v. Commissioner 54 T.C. 986 · 1970
Magic Mart, Inc. v. Commissioner 51 T.C. 775 · 1969
Chatham Corp. v. Commissioner 48 T.C. 145 · 1967
Rhombar Co. v. Commissioner 47 T.C. 75 · 1966
Sandy Estate Co. v. Commissioner 43 T.C. 361 · 1964
Shaw-Walker Co. v. Commissioner 39 T.C. 293 · 1962
Nemours Corp. v. Commissioner 38 T.C. 585 · 1962
R. Gsell & Co. v. Commissioner 34 T.C. 41 · 1960
I. A. Dress Co. v. Commissioner 32 T.C. 93 · 1959
Young Motor Co. v. Commissioner 32 T.C. 1336 · 1959
Dixie, Inc. v. Commissioner 31 T.C. 415 · 1958
Estate of Egan v. Commissioner 28 T.C. 998 · 1957
Haffner's Service Stations, Inc. v. Commissioner 326 F.3d 1 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.