§57 — Items of tax preference

112 cases·19 followed·7 distinguished·2 questioned·84 cited17% support

(a)General rule

For purposes of this part, the items of tax preference determined under this section are—

(1)Depletion

With respect to each property (as defined in section 614), the excess of the deduction for depletion allowable under section 611 for the taxable year over the adjusted basis of the property at the end of the taxable year (determined without regard to the depletion deduction for the taxable year). This paragraph shall not apply to any deduction for depletion computed in accordance with section 613A(c).

(2)Intangible drilling costs
(A)In general

With respect to all oil, gas, and geothermal properties of the taxpayer, the amount (if any) by which the amount of the excess intangible drilling costs arising in the taxable year is greater than 65 percent of the net income of the taxpayer from oil, gas, and geothermal properties for the taxable year.

(B)Excess intangible drilling costs

For purposes of subparagraph (A), the amount of the excess intangible drilling costs arising in the taxable year is the excess of—

(i)

the intangible drilling and development costs paid or incurred in connection with oil, gas, and geothermal wells (other than costs incurred in drilling a nonproductive well) allowable under section 263(c) or 291(b) for the taxable year, over

(ii)

the amount which would have been allowable for the taxable year if such costs had been capitalized and straight line recovery of intangibles (as defined in subsection (b)) had been used with respect to such costs.

(C)Net income from oil, gas, and geothermal properties

For purposes of subparagraph (A), the amount of the net income of the taxpayer from oil, gas, and geothermal properties for the taxable year is the excess of—

(i)

the aggregate amount of gross income (within the meaning of section 613(a)) from all oil, gas, and geothermal properties of the taxpayer received or accrued by the taxpayer during the taxable year, over

(ii)

the amount of any deductions allocable to such properties reduced by the excess described in subparagraph (B) for such taxable year.

(D)Paragraph applied separately with respect to geothermal properties and oil and gas properties

This paragraph shall be applied separately with respect to—

(i)

all oil and gas properties which are not described in clause (ii), and

(ii)

all properties which are geothermal deposits (as defined in section 613(e)(2)).

(E)Exception for independent producers

In the case of any oil or gas well—

(i)In general

This paragraph shall not apply to any taxpayer which is not an integrated oil company (as defined in section 291(b)(4)).

(ii)Limitation on benefit

The reduction in alternative minimum taxable income by reason of clause (i) for any taxable year shall not exceed 40 percent of the alternative minimum taxable income for such year determined without regard to clause (i) and the alternative tax net operating loss deduction under section 56(a)(4).

(3)Repealed. Pub. L. 100–647, title I, § 1007(b)(14)(B), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3430]
(4)Repealed. Pub. L. 104–188, title I, § 1616(b)(3), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1856]
(5)Tax-exempt interest
(A)In general

Interest on specified private activity bonds reduced by any deduction (not allowable in computing the regular tax) which would have been allowable if such interest were includible in gross income.

(B)Treatment of exempt-interest dividends

Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, any exempt-interest dividend (as defined in section 852(b)(5)(A)) shall be treated as interest on a specified private activity bond to the extent of its proportionate share of the interest on such bonds received by the company paying such dividend.

(C)Specified private activity bonds
(i)In general

For purposes of this part, the term “specified private activity bond” means any private activity bond (as defined in section 141) which is issued after August 7, 1986, and the interest on which is not includible in gross income under section 103.

(ii)Exception for qualified 501(c)(3) bonds

For purposes of clause (i), the term “private activity bond” shall not include any qualified 501(c)(3) bond (as defined in section 145).

(iii)Exception for certain housing bonds

For purposes of clause (i), the term “private activity bond” shall not include any bond issued after the date of the enactment of this clause if such bond is—

(I)

an exempt facility bond issued as part of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are to be used to provide qualified residential rental projects (as defined in section 142(d)),

(II)

a qualified mortgage bond (as defined in section 143(a)), or

(III)

a qualified veterans’ mortgage bond (as defined in section 143(b)).

(iv)Exception for refundings

For purposes of clause (i), the term “private activity bond” shall not include any refunding bond (whether a current or advance refunding) if the refunded bond (or in the case of a series of refundings, the original bond) was issued before August 8, 1986.

(v)Certain bonds issued before September 1, 1986

For purposes of this subparagraph, a bond issued before

September 1, 1986

, shall be treated as issued before

August 8, 1986

, unless such bond would be a private activity bond if—

(I)

paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 141(b) were applied by substituting “25 percent” for “10 percent” each place it appears,

(II)

paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) of section 141(b) did not apply, and

(III)

subparagraph (B) of section 141(c)(1) did not apply.

(vi)Exception for bonds issued in 2009 and 2010
(I)In general

For purposes of clause (i), the term “private activity bond” shall not include any bond issued after December 31, 2008, and before January 1, 2011.

(II)Treatment of refunding bonds

For purposes of subclause (I), a refunding bond (whether a current or advance refunding) shall be treated as issued on the date of the issuance of the refunded bond (or in the case of a series of refundings, the original bond).

(III)Exception for certain refunding bonds

Subclause (II) shall not apply to any refunding bond which is issued to refund any bond which was issued after December 31, 2003, and before January 1, 2009.

The preceding sentence shall not apply to any refunding bond unless such preceding sentence applied to the refunded bond (or in the case of a series of refundings, the original bond).

(6)Accelerated depreciation or amortization on certain property placed in service before January 1, 1987

The amounts which would be treated as items of tax preference with respect to the taxpayer under paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and (12) of this subsection (as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 1986). The preceding sentence shall not apply to any property to which section 56(a)(1) or (5) applies.

(7)Exclusion for gains on sale of certain small business stock

In the case of stock acquired on or before the date of the enactment of the Creating Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, an amount equal to 7 percent of the amount excluded from gross income for the taxable year under section 1202.

(b)Straight line recovery of intangibles defined

For purposes of paragraph (2) of subsection (a)—

(1)In general

The term “straight line recovery of intangibles”, when used with respect to intangible drilling and development costs for any well, means (except in the case of an election under paragraph (2)) ratable amortization of such costs over the 120-month period beginning with the month in which production from such well begins.

(2)Election

If the taxpayer elects with respect to the intangible drilling and development costs for any well, the term “straight line recovery of intangibles” means any method which would be permitted for purposes of determining cost depletion with respect to such well and which is selected by the taxpayer for purposes of subsection (a)(2).

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-0 Scope
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-0(a) §1.57-0(a)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-0(b) §1.57-0(b)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-0(c) §1.57-0(c)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-0(d) §1.57-0(d)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-0(e) §1.57-0(e)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-0(f) §1.57-0(f)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-0(g) §1.57-0(g)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-0(h) §1.57-0(h)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-0(i) The capital gains deduction allowable under section 1202 or an equivalent amount in the case of corporations.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-1 Items of tax preference defined
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-1(a) §1.57-1(a)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-1(b) §1.57-1(b)
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-1(c) The date the property is placed in service is, for purposes of this section, deemed to be the first day of the first month for which the amortization deduction is taken with respect to the facility under section 169.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-1(d) Amortization of certified pollution control facilities—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-1(e) Amortization of railroad rolling stock—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-1(f) Stock options—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-1(g) Reserves for losses on bad debts of financial institutions—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-1(h) Depletion—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-1(i) Capital gains—(1) Taxpayers other than corporations.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-1(v) If less than the entire adjusted basis of a facility is subject to amortization under section 169, the otherwise allowable depreciation deduction under section 167 shall be determined only with regard to that portion of the adjusted basis subject to amortization under section 169.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-4 Limitation on amounts treated as items of tax preference for taxable years beginning before January 1, 1976
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-4(a) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-4(b) Limitation.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §1.57-4(c) Recomputed income or loss.

112 Citing Cases

57, and sec. 56 does not apply.

Commissioner, supra, we held that tax preferences are a significant, but not necessarily an indispensable component of alternative minimum taxable income. Accordingly, the taxpayers in that case were held liable for the AMT computed in accordance with the specific provisions of section 55, notwithstanding the fact that the taxpayers did not have any items of tax preference for the taxable year in issue.

FOLLOWED Edward A. Birts, Petitioner · 2001

Commissioner, supra, we held that tax preferences are a significant, but not necessarily an indispensable, component of alternative minimum taxable income. Accordingly, the taxpayers in that case were held liable for the alternative minimum tax computed in accordance with the specific provisions of section 55, notwithstanding the fact that the - 9 - taxpayers did not have any items of tax preference for the taxable year in issue.

Under UBC's Method, which respondent contends is correct, each member of the UBC affiliated group first determines its separate "items of tax preference" pursuant to section 57.

t, reduced by the amt foreign tax credit for the year. Sec. 55(b)(1)(B). AMTI is the taxable income of the taxpayer for the year determined with the adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58 and increased by the amount of items of tax preference in section 57. Sec. 55(b)(2). Section 56(g)(1) provides that the AMTI of any corporation for the taxable year shall be increased by 75 percent of the excess of the corporation’s ACE over the corporation’s preadjustment AMTI, which is the taxpayer’s AMTI

David R. & Margaret J. Klaassen, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1998-241 · 1998

Rather, respondent determined that petitioners are liable for the alternative minimum tax prescribed by section 55. In computing the alternative minimum tax, respondent conceded that petitioners have no items of tax preference within the meaning of section 57. Respondent's determination of the alternative minimum tax is 3 For 1994, each exemption had a value of $2,450. - 4 - based on the following computation and entries from petitioners' income tax return: I. Individual Income Tax Return - For

under subparts A, B, and D of part IV. * * *[17] C. The Two Methods 1. UBC's Method Under UBC's Method, which respondent contends is correct, each member of the UBC affiliated group first determines its separate “items of tax preference” pursuant to section 57. Then, each member's separate items of tax preference are aggregated to establish the UBC affiliated group's total for items of tax preference (UBC's total preferences). That total is reduced by the UBC affiliated group's regular tax liabi

under subparts A, B, and D of part IV. * * *[17] C. The Two Methods 1. UBC's Method Under UBC's Method, which respondent contends is correct, each member of the UBC affiliated group first determines its separate “items of tax preference” pursuant to section 57. Then, each member's separate items of tax preference are aggregated to establish the UBC affiliated group's total for items of tax preference (UBC's total preferences). That total is reduced by the UBC affiliated group's regular tax liabi

um taxable income.¹³ Alternative minimum taxable income is a taxpayer's taxable income determined ¹²Sec. 1.72-17A(f)(4), Income Tax Regs. ¹³Sec. 55(a). -18- [*18] with adjustments under sections 56 and 58 and increased by items oftax preference in section 57.¹4 Ms. Gillette and Mr. Szczepanski's return for 2012 reported an alternative minimum tax of$17,851. They argue that "[i]t is neither fair norjust that Gillette was taxed an alternative minimum tax rate due to her Mirapex-induced gambling" a

Pugsley v. Commissioner, 749 F.2d 691, 692-693 (1 lth Cir. 1985) (time begins to run on date ofmailing ifample time to file a petition). - 13 - not sent to last known address is valid "ifmailing results in actual notice without prejudicial delay"), § 57 T.C. 102 (1971); Frieling v. Commissioner, 81 T.C. 42, 57 (1983) ("[S]o long as the notice ofdeficiency is timely mailed by the Com- missioner and is received without prejudicial delay by the taxpayer * * *, the no- tice is effective for all purp

As relevant herein, section 55(b)(2) defines alternative minimum taxable income as the taxpayer's taxable income for the taxable year determined with the adjustments provided in section 56 and increased by the amounts ofitems oftax preference described in section 57.5 Petitioner had no items oftax preference in 5 As relevant herein, taxable income means gross income less (1) allowable Schedule A itemized deductions and (2) the deduction for personal exemptions.

57.105(2) (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) (fees and costs may be imposed upon a party to civil litigation who has -7- caused unreasonable delay) ;4 Clark v. Clark, 802 So. 2d 478, 478-479 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001) (upholding an award of attorney's fees applied for before the death of the payee spouse); Hirsch v. Hirsch, 519 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. Dist.

reduced by the AMT foreign tax credit for the year . Sec . 55(b)(1)(B) . AMTI is the taxable income of the taxpayer for the year determined with the adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58 and increased by the amount of items of tax preference in section 57 . Sec . 55(b)(2) . Section 56(g)(1) governs the ACE adjustment to AMTI . Preadjustment AMTI is the taxpayer's AMTI determined under section 55(b)(2) but before adjustments for ACE, ATNOL, or the alternative energy deduction . Sec . 1 .56(g

tions fo r State and local income taxes, personal property taxes, an d miscellaneous itemized deductions . See sec . 56(b)(1)(A) arrive at the -final AMTI, section 55(b)(2)(B) increases the above amount with the .' tax preference items described in section 57 . Petiti.oners .areicorrect that they had no tax preference items . However, their income and adjustments were sufficient to subject them to the AMT, as the computation below shows . Step 2 starts with, determining a "taxable excess" ; whic

nt reduced by the AMT foreign tax credit for the year. Sec. 55(b)(1)(B). amti is the taxable income of the taxpayer for the year determined with the adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58 and increased by the amount of items of tax preference in section 57. Sec. 55(b)(2). Section 56(g)(1) governs the ACE adjustment to AMTI. Preadjustment AMTI is the taxpayer’s AMTI determined under section 55(b)(2) but before adjustments for ACE, ATNOL, or the alternative energy deduction. Sec. 1.56(g)-1(a)(

(Items of tax preference are described in section 57 and include depletion, intangible drilling costs, tax-exempt interest, certain accelerated depreciation or amortization, and exclusion for gains on sale of certain small business stock .) - 5 - Petitioner provides no authority to support his position .

Evan & Carol Marcus, Petitioner 129 T.C. No. 4 · 2007

Pertinent to this case, for purposes of computing a taxpayer's AMTI, section 56(b)(3) provides that section 421 shall not apply to the transfer of stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of an ISO .

Tobias & Gertrude O. Weiss, Petitioner 129 T.C. No. 18 · 2007

xable income (AMTI) . Sec . 55(a) ; Allen v . Commissioner, 118 T .C . 1, 5 (2002) . AMTI is defined as the taxpayer's "taxable income" determined with adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58, and increased by items of tax preference described in section 57 . Sec . 55(b)(2) ; Merlo v . Commissioner , 126 T .C . 205, 209 (2006), affd . 492 F .3d 618 (5th Cir . 2007) . The Code generally defines "taxable income" as "gross income" less allowable deductions . Sec. 63(a) . Section 61 expressly def

Weiss v. Commissioner 129 T.C. 175 · 2007

mum taxable income (AMTl). Sec. 55(a); Allen v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 1, 5 (2002). AMTl is defined as the taxpayer’s “taxable income” determined with adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58, and increased by items of tax preference described in section 57. Sec. 55(b)(2); Merlo v. Commissioner, 126 T.C. 205, 209 (2006), affd. 492 F.3d 618 (5th Cir. 2007). The Code generally defines “taxable income” as “gross income” less allowable deductions. Sec. 63(a). Section 61 expressly defines “gross in

Marcus v. Commissioner 129 T.C. 24 · 2007

t applicable for regular tax purposes. Allen v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 1, 5 (2002). AMTI is defined as the taxable income of a taxpayer determined with adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58 and increased by items of tax preference described in section 57. Sec. 55(b)(2); Merlo v. Commissioner, 126 T.C. 205, 209 (2006), affd. 492 F.3d 618 (5th Cir. 2007); Allen v. Commissioner, supra at 5. Pertinent to this case, for purposes of computing a taxpayer’s AMTI, section 56(b)(3) provides that sect

Robert J. Merlo, Petitioner 126 T.C. No. 10 · 2006

1, 5 (2002); see also H.

Nield & Linda Montgomery, Petitioner 127 T.C. No. 3 · 2006

1, 5 (2002) ; see also H.

Merlo v. Commissioner 126 T.C. 205 · 2006

1-249 (1986), 1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 4) 1, 249, 264. AMTI is defined as the taxable income of a taxpayer for the taxable year, determined with adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58, and increased by the amount of items of tax preference described in section 57. Sec. 55(b)(2). As applicable to the instant case, for purposes of computing a taxpayer’s AMTI, section 56(b)(3) provides that section 421 shall not apply to the transfer of stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of an ISO, as defined by

Montgomery v. Commissioner 127 T.C. 43 · 2006

-264 (1986), 1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 4) 1, 249, 264. AMTI is defined as the taxable income of a taxpayer for the taxable year, determined with adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58, and increased by the amount of items of tax preference described in section 57. Sec. 55(b)(2). For purposes of computing a taxpayer’s AMTI, section 56(b)(3) provides that section 421 shall not apply to the transfer of stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of an ISO as defined by section 422. Therefore, under the AMT

tes v. $359,500 in U.S. Currency, 828 F.2d 930, 933 (2d Cir. 1987) (“‘contrasting language in similar statutes may show that the legislature intended different standards of compliance’” (quoting 2A Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, - 38 - sec. 57.06, at 654 (Sands 4th ed. 1984))). Thus, it is the reserve, not merely a contribution equal to the normal cost for the year, that must be computed in determining the account limit. Respondent asserts that courts have held in prior cases, such a

tes v. $359,500 in U.S. Currency, 828 F.2d 930, 933 (2d Cir. 1987) (“‘contrasting language in similar statutes may show that the legislature intended different standards of compliance’” (quoting 2A Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, - 38 - sec. 57.06, at 654 (Sands 4th ed. 1984))). Thus, it is the reserve, not merely a contribution equal to the normal cost for the year, that must be computed in determining the account limit. Respondent asserts that courts have held in prior cases, such a

stments provided in sections 56 and 58 and increased by the amount of tax 1 For petitioner, “the term ‘regular tax’ means the regular tax liability for the taxable year (as defined in sec. 26(b)).” Sec. 55(c)(1). - 6 - preference items set forth in section 57. To determine the taxable amount of AMTI, the AMTI is reduced by an exemption amount, which for a single taxpayer is $33,750, subject to a gradual phaseout of the exemption amount as AMTI exceeds $112,500. See sec. 55(d)(1), (3). The applic

MT liability is determining the alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI), which equals the taxpayer’s taxable income for the year with the adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58, and increased by the amount of tax preference items set forth in section 57. To determine the taxable amount of AMTI, the AMTI is reduced by an exemption amount, which for taxpayers filing a joint return is $45,000, subject to a gradual phaseout of the exemption amount as AMTI exceeds $150,000. See sec. 55(d)(1), (

Section 55(b)(1)(A)(i) provides that the tentative minimum tax is 26 percent of so much of the alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI) that does not exceed $175,000 as exceeds the exemption amount of $45,000.

tes v. $359,500 in U.S. Currency, 828 F.2d 930, 933 (2d Cir. 1987) (“‘contrasting language in similar statutes may show that the legislature intended different standards of compliance’” (quoting 2A Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, - 38 - sec. 57.06, at 654 (Sands 4th ed. 1984))). Thus, it is the reserve, not merely a contribution equal to the normal cost for the year, that must be computed in determining the account limit. Respondent asserts that courts have held in prior cases, such a

tes v. $359,500 in U.S. Currency, 828 F.2d 930, 933 (2d Cir. 1987) (“‘contrasting language in similar statutes may show that the legislature intended different standards of compliance’” (quoting 2A Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, - 38 - sec. 57.06, at 654 (Sands 4th ed. 1984))). Thus, it is the reserve, not merely a contribution equal to the normal cost for the year, that must be computed in determining the account limit. Respondent asserts that courts have held in prior cases, such a

t, reduced by the AMT foreign tax credit. Sec. 55(b)(1)(B). AMTI, in turn, is defined as the taxpayer’s taxable income for the year determined with the adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58 and increased by the tax preference items described in section 57. Sec. 55(b)(2). As pertinent here, one of the adjustments provided in section 56 is the book income adjustment of section 56(f), as follows: SEC. 56(f). Adjustments for Book Income of Corporations.-- (1) In general.--The alternative minimu

nt for married couples filing a joint return is $45,000. Sec. 55(d)(1)(A). AMTI equals the taxpayer’s taxable income for the year determined with the adjustments provided in section 56 and increased by the amount of tax preference items described in section 57. Sec. 55(b)(2). In calculating AMTI, no deduction is allowed for State and local income taxes paid and miscellaneous itemized deductions. Sec. 56(b)(1)(A). Also, no deduction for personal exemptions under section 151 is allowed. Sec. 56(b)

Amantha S. Allen, Petitioner 118 T.C. No. 1 · 2002

ve minimum taxable income" means the taxable income of the taxpayer for the taxable year-- - 15 - (A) determined with the adjustments provided in section 56 and section 58, and (B) increased by the amount of the items of tax preference described in section 57. If a taxpayer is subject to the regular tax, such taxpayer shall be subject to the tax imposed by this section (and, if the regular tax is determined by reference to an amount other than taxable income, such amount shall be treated as the

ve minimum taxable income" means the taxable income of the taxpayer for the taxable year-- - 15 - (A) determined with the adjustments provided in section 56 and section 58, and (B) increased by the amount of the items of tax preference described in section 57. If a taxpayer is subject to the regular tax, such taxpayer shall be subject to the tax imposed by this section (and, if the regular tax is determined by reference to an amount other than taxable income, such amount shall be treated as the

g tax figure is reduced by the alternative minimum foreign tax credit. Sec. 55(b)(1), (d). - 15 - (A) determined with the adjustments provided in section 56 and section 58, and (B) increased by the amount of the items of tax preference described in section 57. If a taxpayer is subject to the regular tax, such taxpayer shall be subject to the tax imposed by this section (and, if the regular tax is determined by reference to an amount other than taxable income, such amount shall be treated as the

John R. & Judith M. Allen, Petitioner 118 T.C. No. 1 · 2002

g tax figure is reduced by the alternative minimum foreign tax credit. Sec. 55(b)(1), (d). - 15 - (A) determined with the adjustments provided in section 56 and section 58, and (B) increased by the amount of the items of tax preference described in section 57. If a taxpayer is subject to the regular tax, such taxpayer shall be subject to the tax imposed by this section (and, if the regular tax is determined by reference to an amount other than taxable income, such amount shall be treated as the

Lawrence Moore, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-196 · 2002

AMTI is computed in the same manner as regular taxable income except that the adjustments - 5 - provided in sections 56 and 58 are taken into account for AMTI, and the tax preference items set forth in section 57 are not permitted to reduce AMTI.

Warren L. Allen, Petitioner 118 T.C. No. 1 · 2002

ve minimum taxable income" means the taxable income of the taxpayer for the taxable year-- - 15 - (A) determined with the adjustments provided in section 56 and section 58, and (B) increased by the amount of the items of tax preference described in section 57. If a taxpayer is subject to the regular tax, such taxpayer shall be subject to the tax imposed by this section (and, if the regular tax is determined by reference to an amount other than taxable income, such amount shall be treated as the

t, reduced by the AMT foreign tax credit. Sec. 55(b)(1)(B). AMTI, in turn, is defined as the taxpayer’s taxable income for the year determined with the adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58 and increased by the tax preference items described in section 57. Sec. 55(b)(2). As pertinent here, one of the adjustments provided in section 56 is the book income adjustment of section 56(f), as follows: SEC. 56(f). Adjustments for Book Income of Corporations.— (1) In general. — The alternative minimu

Paul J. Pekar, Petitioner 113 T.C. No. 12 · 1999

eate a new tax base, the alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI). See sec. 55(b)(2). The normal taxable income is reduced by the adjustments provided for in sections 56 and 58 and increased by the amount of the items of tax preference described in section 57. In petitioner's case, the only applicable adjustment from these sections is the disallowance of the standard deduction and the personal exemption. See sec. 56(b)(1)(E). Petitioner's regular taxable income was $155,599 and was increased by

George & Joan Prosman, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1999-87 · 1999

amount for married couples filing a joint return is $45,000. See sec. 55(d). AMTI equals the taxpayer's taxable income for the year with the adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58 and increased by the amount of tax preference items described in section 57. See sec. 55(b)(2). In calculating AMTI, no deduction is allowed for miscellaneous itemized deductions and State and local taxes paid, unless such amounts are deductible in determining AGI. See sec. 56(b)(1). Also, no deduction for persona

Pekar v. Commissioner 113 T.C. 158 · 1999

eate a new tax base, the alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI). See sec. 55(b)(2). The normal taxable income is reduced by the adjustments provided for in sections 56 and 58 and increased by the amount of the items of tax preference described in section 57. In petitioner’s case, the only applicable adjustment from these sections is the dis-allowance of the standard deduction and the personal exemption. See sec. 56(b)(1)(E). Petitioner’s regular taxable income was $155,599 and was increased b

Jose & Dianne M. Ragatz, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 1998-395 · 1998

AMTI is computed in the same manner as regular taxable income except that the adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58 are taken into account for AMTI, and so-called tax preference items set forth in section 57 are not permitted to reduce AMTI.

Roy E. & Linda Day, Petitioner 108 T.C. No. 2 · 1997

AMTI is computed in the same manner as regular taxable income except that the adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58 are taken into account for AMTI, and the tax preference items set forth in section 57 are not permitted to reduce AMTI.

Day v. Commissioner 108 T.C. 11 · 1997

AMTI is computed in the same manner as regular taxable income except that the adjustments provided in sections 56 and 58 are taken into account for AMTI, and the tax preference items set forth in section 57 are not permitted to reduce AMTI.

Robert A. & Nanci M. Spurgin, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2001-290 · 2001
Estate of Lawler v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 268 · 1969
Prather v. Commissioner 50 T.C. 445 · 1968
Gudmundsson v. United States 634 F.3d 212 · Cir.
King v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 445 · 1987
Kolom v. Commissioner 71 T.C. 235 · 1978
Norwest Corp. v. Commissioner 111 T.C. 105 · 1998
Freesen v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 920 · 1985
Gresham v. Commissioner 79 T.C. 322 · 1982
Anderson v. Commissioner 77 T.C. 1271 · 1981
Sullivan v. Commissioner 76 T.C. 1156 · 1981
Parker v. Commissioner 74 T.C. 29 · 1980
Brutsche v. Commissioner 65 T.C. 1034 · 1976
Izen v. Commissioner 64 T.C. 919 · 1975
Lerer v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 358 · 1969
Harmon v. Commissioner 1 T.C. 40 · 1942
Bonnie Fish v. Greatbanc Trust Company 749 F.3d 671 · Cir.
Merlo v. CIR · Cir.
Allen v. Commissioner 118 T.C. 1 · 2002
Snap-Drape, Inc. v. Commissioner 105 T.C. 16 · 1995
LaPoint v. Commissioner 94 T.C. 733 · 1990
Brown v. Commissioner 93 T.C. 736 · 1989
HBE Corp. v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 87 · 1987
Murphy v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 1284 · 1985
Adler v. Commissioner 85 T.C. 535 · 1985
Huntsberry v. Commissioner 83 T.C. 742 · 1984
Groetzinger v. Commissioner 82 T.C. 793 · 1984
Elkins v. Commissioner 81 T.C. 669 · 1983
Peppiatt v. Commissioner 69 T.C. 848 · 1978
Miller v. Commissioner 70 T.C. 448 · 1978
Baird v. Commissioner 68 T.C. 115 · 1977
Sharpe v. Commissioner 69 T.C. 19 · 1977
Londagin v. Commissioner 61 T.C. 117 · 1973
Allen v. Commissioner 61 T.C. 125 · 1973
King v. Commissioner 51 T.C. 851 · 1969
Swinks v. Commissioner 51 T.C. 13 · 1968
Ginsberg v. Commissioner 35 T.C. 1148 · 1961
Sullivan v. Commissioner 29 T.C. 71 · 1957
Noell v. Commissioner 24 T.C. 329 · 1955
Murphy v. Commissioner 20 T.C. 746 · 1953
Merlo v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 492 F.3d 618 · Cir.
Gudmundsson v. United States · Cir.
Combs v. Homer Ctr Sch Dist · Cir.
Combs v. Homer Ctr Sch Dist · Cir.
United States v. Saldana · Cir.
State of Texas v. USA 968 F.3d 402 · Cir.
State of TX v. USA 987 F.3d 518 · Cir.
Southeast Waffles, LLC v. United States Department of Treasury 702 F.3d 850 · Cir.
Federal Trade Commission v. The Estate of John Pukke · Cir.
Federal Trade Commission v. Peter Baker · Cir.
Federal Trade Commission v. John Usher · Cir.
Federal Trade Commission v. Global Property Alliance, Inc. · Cir.
Federal Trade Commission v. Andris Pukke · Cir.
Federal Trade Commission v. Andris Pukke 53 F.4th 80 · Cir.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Commissioner 105 F. App'x 67 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.