§6159 — Agreements for payment of tax liability in installments

124 cases·7 followed·3 distinguished·2 overruled·112 cited6% support

(a)Authorization of agreements

The Secretary is authorized to enter into written agreements with any taxpayer under which such taxpayer is allowed to make payment on any tax in installment payments if the Secretary determines that such agreement will facilitate full or partial collection of such liability.

(b)Extent to which agreements remain in effect
(1)In general

Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, any agreement entered into by the Secretary under subsection (a) shall remain in effect for the term of the agreement.

(2)Inadequate information or jeopardy

The Secretary may terminate any agreement entered into by the Secretary under subsection (a) if—

(A)

information which the taxpayer provided to the Secretary prior to the date such agreement was entered into was inaccurate or incomplete, or

(B)

the Secretary believes that collection of any tax to which an agreement under this section relates is in jeopardy.

(3)Subsequent change in financial conditions

If the Secretary makes a determination that the financial condition of a taxpayer with whom the Secretary has entered into an agreement under subsection (a) has significantly changed, the Secretary may alter, modify, or terminate such agreement.

(4)Failure to pay an installment or any other tax liability when due or to provide requested financial information

The Secretary may alter, modify, or terminate an agreement entered into by the Secretary under subsection (a) in the case of the failure of the taxpayer—

(A)

to pay any installment at the time such installment payment is due under such agreement,

(B)

to pay any other tax liability at the time such liability is due, or

(C)

to provide a financial condition update as requested by the Secretary.

(5)Notice requirements

The Secretary may not take any action under paragraph (2), (3), or (4) unless—

(A)

a notice of such action is provided to the taxpayer not later than the day 30 days before the date of such action, and

(B)

such notice includes an explanation why the Secretary intends to take such action.

The preceding sentence shall not apply in any case in which the Secretary believes that collection of any tax to which an agreement under this section relates is in jeopardy.

(c)Secretary required to enter into installment agreements in certain cases

In the case of a liability for tax of an individual under subtitle A, the Secretary shall enter into an agreement to accept the full payment of such tax in installments if, as of the date the individual offers to enter into the agreement—

(1)

the aggregate amount of such liability (determined without regard to interest, penalties, additions to the tax, and additional amounts) does not exceed $10,000;

(2)

the taxpayer (and, if such liability relates to a joint return, the taxpayer’s spouse) has not, during any of the preceding 5 taxable years—

(A)

failed to file any return of tax imposed by subtitle A;

(B)

failed to pay any tax required to be shown on any such return; or

(C)

entered into an installment agreement under this section for payment of any tax imposed by subtitle A,

(3)

the Secretary determines that the taxpayer is financially unable to pay such liability in full when due (and the taxpayer submits such information as the Secretary may require to make such determination);

(4)

the agreement requires full payment of such liability within 3 years; and

(5)

the taxpayer agrees to comply with the provisions of this title for the period such agreement is in effect.

(d)Secretary required to review installment agreements for partial collection every two years

In the case of an agreement entered into by the Secretary under subsection (a) for partial collection of a tax liability, the Secretary shall review the agreement at least once every 2 years.

(e)Administrative review

The Secretary shall establish procedures for an independent administrative review of terminations of installment agreements under this section for taxpayers who request such a review.

(f)Installment agreement fees
(1)Limitation on fee amount

The amount of any fee imposed on an installment agreement under this section may not exceed the amount of such fee as in effect on the date of the enactment of this subsection.

(2)Waiver or reimbursement

In the case of any taxpayer with an adjusted gross income, as determined for the most recent year for which such information is available, which does not exceed 250 percent of the applicable poverty level (as determined by the Secretary)—

(A)

if the taxpayer has agreed to make payments under the installment agreement by electronic payment through a debit instrument, no fee shall be imposed on an installment agreement under this section, and

(B)

if the taxpayer is unable to make payments under the installment agreement by electronic payment through a debit instrument, the Secretary shall, upon completion of the installment agreement, pay the taxpayer an amount equal to any such fees imposed.

(g)Cross reference

For rights to administrative review and appeal, see section 7122(e).

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-0 Table of contents
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-0(a) Authority.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-0(b) Procedures for submission and consideration of proposed installment agreements.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-0(c) Acceptance, form, and terms of installment agreements.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-0(d) Rejection of a proposed installment agreement.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-0(e) Modification or termination of installment agreements by the Internal Revenue Service.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-0(f) Effect of installment agreement or pending installment agreement on collection activity.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-0(g) Suspension of the statute of limitations on collection.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-0(h) Annual statement.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-0(i) Biennial review of partial payment installment agreements.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-0(j) Cross reference.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-0(k) Effective/applicability date.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-1 Agreements for payment of tax liabilities in installments
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-1(a) Authority.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-1(b) Procedures for submission and consideration of proposed installment agreements—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-1(c) Acceptance, form, and terms of installment agreements—(1) Acceptance of an installment agreement—(i) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-1(d) Rejection of a proposed installment agreement—(1) When a proposed installment agreement becomes rejected.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-1(e) Modification or termination of installment agreements by the Internal Revenue Service—(1) Inadequate information or jeopardy.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-1(f) Effect of installment agreement or pending installment agreement on collection activity—(1) In general.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-1(g) Suspension of the statute of limitations on collection.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-1(h) Annual statement.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-1(i) Biennial review of partial payment installment agreements.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-1(j) Cross reference.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-1(k) Effective/applicability date.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6159-1(v) While an installment agreement is in effect, the Commissioner may request, and the taxpayer must provide, a financial condition update at any time.

124 Citing Cases

OVERRULED Kenneth B. & Marie L. Boyd, Petitioner 124 T.C. No. 18 · 2005

492, 494-495, (continued...) - 13 - any basis to overrule Offiler v.

DIST. Dana Ray Reynolds, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2021-10 · 2021

Regardless of how these payments might be characterized, they were not the result of any installment agreement under section 6159, which authorizes the Secretary to enter into installment agreements for the payment of taxes. Consequently, section 6331(k)(2)(C), which generally bars the IRS from making a “levy” on a person’s property while an installment agreement under section 6159 is in effect, is inapplicable--not only because there was no installment agreement under section 6159 in effect but

DIST. Larry E. Tucker, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-67 · 2011

Appeals still does not believe a long term deferred offer is a better alternative to a PPIA because the Service still has to collect and monitor payments for the next 116 months and unlike a long term deferred offer, the payments on a PPIA are negotiable. IRS Section 6159 requires that PPIAs be reviewed every two years.

FOLLOWED Wayne Rebuck, Petitioner · 2016

Accordingly, we hold that SO McCarrick's rejection ofpetitioner's OIC based on the provisions ofIRM pt.

Further, even if an installment agreement were in effect pursuant to section 6159, such agreement would not prevent the filing of a notice of Federal tax lien.

ary [ofthe Treasury] may withdraw a notice ofa lien filed under this section * * * ifthe Secretary determines that-- (A) the filing ofsuch notice was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe Secretary, (B) the taxpayer has entered into an agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the 2This regulation was later amended on November 25, 2009. T.D. 9473, 2009-52 I.R.B. 945. Because the amendment was "applicable on November 25, 2009", bl.

Peter & Kathleen Kuretski, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-262 · 2012

Section 6159 authorizes the IRS to enter into written agreements allowing taxpayers to pay tax in installment payments ifit deems that the "agreement will facilitate full or partial collection ofsuch liability." Petitioners do not meet the requirements ofsection 6159(c), which obligates the IRS to accept full payment installment agreements in certa

Mark L. Rosenbloom, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-140 · 2011

o Code section, regulation, or Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) provision allows the IRS to terminate an installment agreement (and then presumably proceed with a levy) solely because the taxpayer refused to extend the collection statute. See generally sec. 6159. Therefore the IRS was exposed to potential civil liability, as well as negative press. See sec. 7433; Service Center Advice 1998-003 (Feb. 17, 1998) (discussing the problem). Statute-of-limitations waivers that the IRS procured this way we

ment agreements with any taxpayer "to satisfy liability for payment of any tax in installment payments if the Secretary determines that such agreement will facilitate collection of such liability." (Emphasis added.) Similarly, the regulations under section 6159 authorize designated personnel of the Commissioner to enter into an installment agreement with a taxpayer "that allows the taxpayer to satisfy a tax liability by making scheduled periodic payments until the liability is fully paid".

Richard T. & Catherine L. Lites, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2005-206 · 2005

til the tax liability is fully paid.9 Sec. 301.6159-1(a), Proced. & Admin. Regs. Respondent generally has the discretion 9 In the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA 2004), Pub. L. 108-357, sec. 843(a)(1), 118 Stat. 1418, 1600, Congress amended sec. 6159 to authorize the Secretary to enter into installment agreements “under which such taxpayer is allowed to make payment on any tax in installment payments if the Secretary determines that such agreement will facilitate full or partial collect

Hector & Mooneem Castillo, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2004-238 · 2004

ers later submitted personal financial information that reflected $343,842 in liquid assets and $811,408 equity in real estate. Petitioners' counsel contacted the respondent's Appeals Office and requested a $1,500 monthly installment agreement under section 6159. Petitioners also offered to pay the balance of the liability when they managed to sell some of their properties. After reviewing petitioners' financial information, respondent - 4 - determined that petitioners had the ability to pay $5,

xpayer to pay a tax liability in installments if it concludes that the agreement “will facilitate full or partial collection of such liability.” An installment agreement operates pursuant to statute and may be terminated only under the provisions of section 6159. Petitioner acknowledges there were issues with her tax return. Petitioner suggests that the review of the return which disclosed a math error before the installment agreement should have resulted in the correction of all issues in her t

Alberto Garcia, Jr., Petitioner 164 T.C. No. 8 · 2025

Garcia is not paying any of his debts pursuant to an agreement under section 6159 or 7122.

Christopher Crumedy, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2024-19 · 2024

14, 21–22 (2019), we made clear that (1) section 6702(b) imposes a penalty when a frivolous position is asserted in “specified frivolous submissions,” which are defined in section 6702(b)(2)(B) as CDP hearing requests and applications under section 6159 (relating to written installment payment agreements), section 7122 (relating to compromises), and section 7811 (relating to taxpayer assistance orders); and (2) section 6702(b)(3) provides a circumstance, i.e., allowing a taxpayer to withdraw his

Blake M. Adams, Petitioner 160 T.C. No. 1 · 2023

under section 6159 or [a compromise agreement under section] 7122” is a seriously delinquent tax debt. I.R.C. § 7345(b)(2)(A). If a certification is found to be erroneous or if the certified debt is fully satisfied or ceases to be seriously delinquent because of one of the exceptions, then the IRS must reverse its certification and notify the Secretary o

ue. The installment agreement was entered on August 13, 2019, and was subsequently terminated on May 11, 2020. The record does not contain any evidence that Mr. Gayou is currently paying his tax liabilities pursuant to an installment agreement under section 6159. On April 19, 2021, the IRS issued Mr. Gayou a Notice CP508C, Notice of Certification of Your Seriously Delinquent Federal Tax Debt to the State Department (Passport Notice), with respect to the taxable years at issue. The Passport Notic

§ 301.6159-1(c)(1). A settlement officer does not abuse her discretion when she moves forward with a determination after the taxpayer has an adequate period 5 Petitioners do not assign error to the settlement officer’s verification that the requirements of applicable law or administrative procedure had been met. Thus, they waive

under section 6159 or [a compromise agreement under section] 7122” is a seriously delinquent tax debt. I.R.C. § 7345(b)(2)(A). If a certification is found to be erroneous or if the certified debt is fully satisfied or ceases to be seriously delinquent because of one of the exceptions, then the IRS must reverse its certification and notify the Secretary o

Michael B. Shapiro, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2023-144 · 2023

Shapiro ever: • requested an extension of time for the payment of tax, see § 6161; • submitted an installment agreement request to the IRS, see § 6159; • was in the practice of setting amounts aside for the payment of his tax besides making sporadic estimated tax payments; • sought out legitimate borrowing sources, such as banks, credit card companies, or others who might have been willing to lend to 20 The record also discloses that during the pendency of the divorce, Dr.

George E. Kosmides, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2023-138 · 2023

Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into written agreements allowing taxpayers to pay tax in installment payments if he deems that the “agreement will facilitate full or partial collection of such liability.” Subject to exceptions not relevant here, the decision to accept or reject installment agreements lies within the discretion of

Ifeoma Ezekwo, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2022-54 · 2022

under section 6159 or 7122” and a debt with respect to which “innocent spouse” relief under section 6015(f) has been re- quested. § 7345(b)(2)(A), (B)(ii). There is no evidence, and petitioner does not allege, that either of these exclusions applies here. 5 In 2007 petitioner filed a petition in docket No. 25581-07S, referencing tax years 2003–2007 and a

Gina C. Lewis, Petitioner 158 T.C. No. 3 · 2022

Lewis reserves all collection rights that she may qualify for now or in the future, including without limitation, the right to relief under IRC §6015 (innocent spouse), §6159 (installment agreement), §7122 (offer in compromise), §6343 (release of levy), §7811 (taxpayer assistance order), §6502 (statute of limitations on collection), §6325 (release of lien), collection due process, collection appeals program, currently non-collectible status, bankruptcy, and any other current or future law that m

Thomas E. Kelly, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2022-73 · 2022

Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into an in- stallment agreement if he determines that it will facilitate full or partial collection of a taxpayer’s unpaid liability. See ibid. Subject to exceptions not relevant here, the decision to accept or reject an installment agree- ment lies within the Commissioner’s discretion. See Treas. R

Robert Rowen, Petitioner 156 T.C. No. 8 · 2021

e been exhausted or have lapsed, or * * * levy is made pursuant to section 6331.” Section 7345(b)(2) excludes from the definition of “seriously delinquent tax debt” any debt that is “being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement * * * under section 6159 or 7122” and any debt for which “collection is suspended * * * because a due process hearing under section 6330 is requested or pending, or * * * because” relief under section 6015 is requested.7 Section 7345(d) requires the Commissioner

Under section 6159, if a taxpayer cannot timely pay the full amount of tax due, Appeals may allow the taxpayer to pay the tax in installments if Appeals - 29 - [*29] determines that such an agreement will facilitate full or partial collection of the liability. The discretion to accept or reject a taxpayer’s IA lies within the discretion of the Commissio

Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into an IA ifhe deter- mines that it will facilitate full or partial collection ofa taxpayer's unpaid liability. S_e_e Thompson v. Commissioner, 140 T.C. 173, 179 (2013). Subject to exceptions not relevant here, the decision to accept or reject an IA lies within the Commis- sioner's discretion. See

- 7 - [*7] Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into an IA ifhe deter- mines that it will facilitate full or partial collection ofa taxpayer's unpaid liability.

2012): "If* * * [a] CDP officer or employee enters into an installment agreement under section 6159, a closing agreement under section 7121, or an OIC [offer-in-compromise] under section 7122 with the taxpayer, then ofcourse the agency will be bound under general contract principles to honor the agreement." But we concluded that determinations ofAppeals personnel not reflected in such an agreement are not final and binding on the IRS

- 11 - [*11] Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into an IA ifhe deter- mines that it will facilitate full or partial collection ofa taxpayer's unpaid liability.

Section 6159 authorizes the Commissionerto enter into an IA ifhe deter- mines that it will facilitate full or partial collection ofa taxpayer's unpaid liability. S_e_e Thompson v. Commissioner, 140 T.C. at 179. Subject to exceptions not relevant here, the decision to accept or reject an IA lies within the Commissioner's discretion. See Rebuck v. Co

Section 6159 authorizes the Commis- sioner to enter into an installment agreement ifhe determines that it will facilitate full or partial collection ofa taxpayer's unpaid liability. See Thompson, 140 T.C. at 179. Subject to exceptions not relevant here, the decision to accept or reject an installment agreement lies within the Commissioner's discret

Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into an installment agreement ifhe determines that it will facilitate full or partial collection ofa taxpayer's unpaid liability. See Thompson v. Commissioner, 140 T.C. 173, 179 (2013). Subject to exceptions not relevant here, - 9 - [*9] the decision to accept or reject an installment agreement lie

In order to secure a collection alternative like this, however, petitioner needed to do three things: (1) make an actual proposal ofa collection alternative, (2) submit financial - 34 - information establishing that this was all he could afford to pay, and (3) become current in his tax filing obligations. Petitioner did none ofthese th

notice has not been filed, ifthe Secretary determines that-- (A) the filing ofsuch notice was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe Secretary, - 13 - [*13] (B) the taxpayerhas entered into an agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was imposed by means ofinstallment payments, unless such agreement provides otherwise, (C) the withdrawal ofsuch notice will facilitate the collection ofthe tax liability, or (D) with the co

Section 6159 authorizes the Commissionerto enter into an IA ifhe deter- mines that it will facilitate full or partial collection ofa taxpayer's unpaid liability. S_e_e Thompson v. Commissioner, 140 T.C. 173, 179 (2013). Subject to exceptions not relevant here, the decision to accept or reject an IA lies within the Commis- sioner's discretion. See R

- 8 - [*8] Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into an IA ifhe deter- mines that it will facilitate full or partial collection ofa taxpayer's unpaid liability.

6323(j) provides that the Commissioner may withdraw a notice of Federal tax lien if(1) the filing ofthe notice ofFederal tax lien was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe Secretary, (2) the taxpayer entered into an installment agreement under sec.

under the following conditions: (cid:16)042 The filing ofthe NFTL was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe Internal Revenue Service, (cid:16)042 The taxpayerhad entered into an installment agreement under IRC § 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was imposed by means ofinstallment payments, unless such agreement provides otherwise, (cid:16)042 Withdrawal ofthe lien will facilitate collection ofthe tax liability, or (cid:16)042 With the co

- 7 - [*7] In its hearing request petitioner indicated its desire for a collection alterna- tive, specifically, reinstatement ofa prior installment agreement on which it had defaulted.2 Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into an installment agreement ifhe determines that it will facilitate full or partial collection ofa tax- payer's unpaid liability.

Installment Agreement Section 6159 authorizes the Commissionerto enter into written agreements allowing taxpayers to pay tax in installment payments ifhe deems that the 24The dissent contends that we have concluded that the Melaskys are "really, really bad".

- 9 - [*9] Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into an installment agreement ifhe determines that it will facilitate full or partial collection ofa tax- payer's unpaid liability.

In their hearing request petitioners indicated their intention to seek a collection alternative in the form ofan installment agreement.5 Section 6159 authorizes the Commissionerto enter into an installment agreement ifhe determines that it will facilitate full or partial collection ofa tax- payer's unpaid liability.

Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into an installment agreement ifhe determines that it will facilitate full or partial collection ofa tax- payer's unpaid liability. See Thompson, 140 T.C. at 179. The decision to accept or reject an installment agreement lies within the SO's discretion. See sec. 301.6159-1(a), (c)(1)(i), Proced. & A

The NFTL may be withdrawn under the following conditions: (a) the filing of the notice was premature or otherwise not in accordance with the Services administrative procedures, (b) the taxpayer entered into an agreement under Section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was imposed by means of installment payments, unless such agreement provides otherwise, - 38 - [*38] (c) withdrawal of such notice will facilitate the collection of the tax liability, or (d) with the consent of th

fthe withdrawn notice has not been filed, ifthe Secretary determines that-- (A) the filing ofsuch notice was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe Secretary, (B) the taxpayerhas entered into an agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was imposed by means ofinstallment payments, unless such agreement provides otherwise, (C) the withdrawal ofsuch notice will facilitate the collection ofthe tax liability, or (D) with the c

When detenmining whether a taxpayer's proposed installment agreement will facilitate collection ofthe liability under section 6159, the IRS makes a financial analysis ofthe taxpayer's monthly income and expenses and the - 23 - [*23] taxpayer's ability to pay.

Section 6159 authorizes the IRS to enter into a written agreement allowing a taxpayerto pay a tax liability in installments ifit concludes that the "agreement will facilitate full or partial collection ofsuch liability." The IRS has discretion to - 7 - [*7] reject a proposed installment agreement (subject to certain restrictions when the liability

Section 6159 authorizes the IRS to enter into a written agreement allowing a taxpayerto pay a tax liability in installments ifit concludes thatthe "agreementwill facilitate full or partial collection ofsuch liability." Though stating his intention to do so, petitioner never actually proposed an installment agreement. The SO gave him a reasonable ex

and without prejudice under the following conditions: * The filing ofthe notice oflien was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe Internal Revenue Service; * The taxpayerhad entered into an agreement under IRC § 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was imposed by means of installment payments, unless such agreement provides otherwise; * Withdrawal ofthe lien will facilitate collection ofthe tax liability; or * Withdrawal ofthe lien would be

Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into installment agreements with taxpayers to satisfy their liabilities ifthe Commissioner determines that such agreements will facilitate the collection ofthe liabilities. The Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) and sections 301.6159-1, 301.6320-1, and 301.6330-1, Proced. & Admin. Regs., establish the IR

thout full payment and without prejudice under the following conditions: (1) the filing ofthe NFTL was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe IRS; (2) the taxpayerhad entered into an installment agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the NFTL was imposed by means of installment payments, unless such agreement provides otherwise; (3) withdrawal ofthe NFTL will facilitate collection ofthe tax liability; or (4) with the consent of

fthe withdrawn notice had not been filed, ifthe Secretary determines that-- (A) the filing ofsuch notice was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe Secretary, (B) the taxpayerhas entered into an agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was - 7 - [*7] imposed by means ofinstallment payments, unless such agreementprovides otherwise, (C) the withdrawal ofsuch notice will facilitate the collection ofthe tax liability, or (D)

Section 6159 authorizes the Commissionerto enter into installment agreements with taxpayers to satisfy their liabilities ifthe Commissioner determines that such agreements will facilitate the collection ofthe liabilities. The Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) and sections 301.6159-1, 301.6320-1, and 301.6330-1, Proced. & Admin. Regs., establish the IRS

Section 6159 authorizes the IRS to enter into a written agreement allowing a taxpayerto pay a tax liability in installments if it concludes thatthe "agreementwill facilitate full or partial collection ofsuch liability." The decision to accept or reject installment agreements lies within the Commissioner's discretion. See Thompson v. Commissioner, 1

2) provides: (2) Installment agreements.--No levy may be made under subsection (a) on the property or rights to property ofany person with respectto any unpaid tax- (A) during the period that an offer by such person for an installment agreementunder section 6159 for payment ofsuch unpaid tax is pending with the Secretary; and (B) ifsuch offer is rejected by the Secretary, during the 30 days thereafter (and, ifan appeal ofsuch rejection is filed within such 30 days, during the period that such ap

thdrawn notice had not been filed, ifthe Secretary determines that-- - 6 - (A) the filing ofsuch notice was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe Secretary, (B) the taxpayerhas entered into an agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was imposed by means ofinstallmentpayments, unless such agreementprovides otherwise, (C) the withdrawal ofsuch notice will facilitate the collection ofthe tax liability, or (D) with the cons

Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into a written agreement allowing a taxpayerto pay a liability in installments ifthe "agreement will - 13 - facilitate full or partial collection ofsuch liability." The decision to accept or reject installment agreements lies within the discretion ofthe Commissioner. S_e_e Thompson v. Commissioner,

Collection Alternatives Petitioner's request for an administrative hearing included a statement that he intended to propose an installment agreement.6 Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into written agreements allowing taxpayers to pay a tax liability in installment payments ifhe deems that the "agreement will facilitate full or partial collection ofsuch liability." The decision to accept or reject installment agreements lies within the discretion ofthe Commissioner.

hout full payment and without prejudice under the following conditions: (1) the filing ofthe NFTL was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe IRS; (2) the taxpayerhad entered into an installment agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the NFTL was imposed by means ofinstallmentpayments, unless such agreement provides otherwise; (3) withdrawal ofthe NFTL will facilitate collection ofthe tax liability; and (4) with the consent ofthe

IRS Rejection ofthe Installment Agreement "Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into written agreements allowing taxpayers to pay tax in installmentpayments ifhe deems that the 'agreementwill facilitate full or partial collection ofsuch liability.'" Thompson v.

Section 6159 authorizes the IRS to enter into a written agreement allowing a taxpayer to pay a tax liability in installments if it concludes that the "agreement will facilitate full or partial collection ofsuch liability." The decision to accept or reject installment agreements lies within the discretion ofthe Commissioner. See Thompson v. Commissi

ate concern * * * that any collection action be no more intrusive than necessary." In addition, petitioner argues that the reasoning and rationale ofsection 6323(j)(1)(B)-(D), which sets forth criteria pursuantto which the Commissioner may withdraw a previously filed notice oflien (one ofwhich is the entering into of an installment agreement under section 6159), are applicable to demonstrate that a notice oflien is unnecessary in the circumstances ofthis case.

nd withoutprejudice under the following conditions: (1) the filing ofthe NFTL was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe Internal Revenue Service; (2) the taxpayerhad entered into an installment agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the NFTL was imposed by means ofinstallment payments, unless such agreementprovides otherwise; (3) withdrawal ofthe NFTL will facilitate collection ofthe tax liability; (4) with the consent ofthe ta

Michael Burt, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2013-140 · 2013

s for the IRS to withdraw the,NFTL when it is determined that -- the filing ofthe NFTL was premature or otherwise not in accor- dance with the IRS's administrative procedures, - 14 - [*14] the taxpayerhas entered into an installment agreement under § 6159 to satisfythe tax liability for which the lien was imposed by means ofinstallmentpayments, unless such agreementprovides otherwise, the withdrawal ofthe NFTL will facilitate collection ofthe liability, or with the consent ofthe taxpayer or the

without prejudice under the following conditions: (1) the filing ofthe NFTL was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe Internal Revenue Service; (2) the taxpayerhad entered into an installment agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the NFTL was imposed by means ofinstallmentpayments, unless such agreementprovides otherwise; (3) withdrawal ofthe NFTL will facilitate collection ofthe tax liability; (4) with the consent ofthe taxp

J & S Auto Painting, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2013-232 · 2013

- 14 - [*14] Rejection ofInstallment Agreement Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into written agreements allowing taxpayers to pay tax in installment payments ifhe deems that the "agreement will facilitate full or partial collection ofsuch liability." The Commissioner in general has the discretion to accept or reject any proposed installment agreement.

The lien notice may be withdrawn if (A) the filing ofthe notice ofthe lien was premature; (B) the taxpayerhas entered into an agreementunder section 6159 (i.e., an installment agreement) to satisfy the liability by means ofinstallment payments unless the agreement provides otherwise; (C) the withdrawal will facilitate the collection ofthe tax liability; or (D) with the consent ofthe taxpayer or the National Taxpayer Advocate, the withdrawal ofthe notice would be in the best interest oft

llowing conditions: (cid:16)042 The filing ofthe notice oflien was premature or other- wise not in accordance with.administrative procedures of the Internal Revenue Service: (cid:16)042 The taxpayerhad entered into an installment agreement under IRC § 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was imposed by means ofinstallment payments, un- less such agreement provides otherwise: (cid:16)042 Withdrawal ofthe lien will facilitate collection ofthe tax liability : or (cid:16)042 With the

McCarthy Companies, LLC, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2013-214 · 2013

6159; see Etkin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005- 245. The Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) establishes, in part, the procedures the Commissioner will use in determining whether a proposed installment agreement facilitates the Commissioner's collecting an unpaid tax liability. See Friedman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2013-44. This Court has uphel

Jurate Antioco, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2013-35 · 2013

Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into an installment agreement where it will "facilitate full or partial collection." See sec. 6159(a); sec. 301.6159-1(a), Proced. & Admin. Regs. The Internal Revenue Manual states that a taxpayer does not qualify for installment agreements ifthe taxpayer's account can be fully or partially satisfie

Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into installment agreements with taxpayers to satisfy their liabilities ifthe Commissioner determines that such agreements will facilitate the collection ofthe liabilities. The Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) and sections 301.6159-1, 301.6320-1, and 301.6330-1, Proced. & Admin. Regs., establish the IR

full payment and without prejudice under the following conditions: (1) the filing ofthe NFTL was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe IRS; (2) the taxpayerhad entered into an installment agreement -16- under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the NFTL was imposed by means ofinstallment payments, unless the agreementprovides otherwise; (3) withdrawal ofthe NFTL will facilitate collection ofthe tax liability; (4) with the consent ofthe taxp

George Thompson, Petitioner 140 T.C. No. 4 · 2013

Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into written agreements allowing taxpayers to pay¡tax in installmentpayments ifhe deems that the "agreement will facilitate full or partial collection ofsuch liability." The decision to accept or reject installment agreements lies within the discretion ofthe - 12 - Commissioner.8 See Kuretski v. Co

Kevin P. & Candace C. McCarthy, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2013-214 · 2013

6159; see Etkin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005- 245. The Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) establishes, in part, the procedures the Commissioner will use in determining whether a proposed installment agreement facilitates the Commissioner's collecting an unpaid tax liability. See Friedman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2013-44. This Court has uphel

Robert A. Akonji, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-56 · 2012

The only contentionpetitioner made in contesting the NFTL is that he had entered into an installment agreement with respondent; Section 6323(j)(1)(B) allows the Secretaryto withdraw a notice ofa lien ifthe taxpayerhas entered into an installment agreementunder section 6159 that satisfies the liability for which the lien was imposed.

James W. Winters, II, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-85 · 2012

In general, the decision to accept or reject an installment agreement proposed by a taxpayer is subject to the Commissioner's discretion. Sec. 301.6159-1(b)(1)(i), Proced. & Admin. Regs. At the collection due process hearing, the taxpayer is expected to provide all relevant information requested by the Appeals Office, including f'mancial

Irving & Stella Watchman, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-113 · 2012

Section 6159 authorizes the IRS to enter into installment agreements for the satisfaction oftax liabilities, including interest and penalties. When the Watchmans' installment agreement was entered into in 2001, the IRS interpreted section 6159 (as then in effect) as precluding installment agreements that provided for less than full payment ofall ta

Stephen S. Kyereme, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-174 · 2012

fthe withdrawn notice had not been filed, if the Secretary determines that- (A) the filing ofsuch notice was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe Secretary, (B) the taxpayerhas entered into an agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was imposed by means ofinstallment payments, unless such agreement provides otherwise, 4Mr.

Erik William Skidmore, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2012-328 · 2012

ollowihg conditions: (cid:16)042 The filins, ofthe notice oflien was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures ofthe Internal Revenue Service; (cid:16)042 The taxpàyerhad entered into an installment agreement under IRC § 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for whichthe lien was - 7 - [*7] imposed by means ofinstallmentpayments, unless such agreementprovides otherwise; (cid:16)042 Withdrawal ofthe lien will facilitate collection ofthe tax liability; (cid:16)042 With th

Specified submissions include requests for an administrative hearing under sections 6320 and 6330 and applications for an installment agreement under section 6159, an offer-in-compromise under section 7122, or a taxpayer assistance order under section 7811.

John Carlyle Berkery, Sr., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-57 · 2011

thdrawn notice had not been filed, if the Secretary determines that-- (A) the-filing of'such notice was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures of the Secretary, (B) the ·taxpayer has entered into an' agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was imposed by.means of installment payments, unless such agreement provides otherwise, I (C) the withdrawal of such notice will - facilitate the collection of the tax liability, or (D) with

Elijah B. Freeman, Jr., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-38 · 2011

The IRS may withdraw the notice of federal tax lien if "the taxpayer has entered into an agreement under section 6159s to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was - imposed by means- ofs installment payments, unless -such agreement provides otherwise" .

lien filed under this section * * * if the Secretary determines that-- (A) the filing of such notice was premature or¡~otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures of the Secretary, (B) the taxpayer has entered into an agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was imposed by means of installment payments, unless such agreement provides otherwise, (C) the withdrawal of such notice will facilitate the collection of the tax liability, or (D) with th

Larry E. Tucker, Petitioner 135 T.C. No. 6 · 2010

Collection issues If the CDP officer or employee enters into an installmen t agreement under section 6159, a closing agreement under section - 46 - 7121, or an OIC under section 7122 with the taxpayer, then of course the agency will be bound under general contract principles to honor the]]agreement .56 However the agency is also bound t o i honor such agreements that it enters into outside of the CDP context, whether by the office of Appe

.continued) (A) the filing of such notice was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures of the Secretary , (B) the taxpayer has entered into an agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was imposed by means of installment payments, unless such agreement provides otherwise , (C) the withdrawal of such notice will facilitate the collection of the tax liability, o r (D) with the consent of the taxpayer or the National Taxpayer Advocat

Section 6159 authorizes the Secret y to enter into a written installment agreement with a t ayer if such an agreement will facilitate the full or tial collection of the tax liability . Section 7122(a) permits e Secretary to compromise tax liabilities . Section 71 (c) requires the Secretary to prescribe guidelines for e luating offers in compromise

Richard & Mabel Kelby, Petitioner 130 T.C. No. 6 · 2008

It is hereby stipulated that the Court may enter the foregoing decision in this case. Petitioners’ proposed decision document states: Pursuant to agreement of the parties, it is ORDERED AND DECIDED: That the determination set forth in the NOTICE OF DETERMINATION CONCERNING COLLECTION ACTION(S) UNDER -7- SECTION 6320 issued on July 10, 2003

lien filed under this section * * * if the Secretary determines that-- (A) the filing of such notice was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures of the Secretary , (B) the taxpayer has entered into an agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien wa s imposed by means of installment payments, unless such agreement provides otherwise , (C) the withdrawal of such notice will facilitate the collection of the tax liability, or (D) with t

Charles M. Williams, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2008-173 · 2008

the Service either authority to withdraw a NFTL under the following-circumstances : .The filing of the notice was premature or otherwise not in accordance with the Service's administrative procedures ; 0 The taxpayer entered into an agreement under Section 6159 to .s,atisfy the tax liability for which the lien was imposed by means of installment payments, unless such agreement - 16 - provides otherwise, Withdrawal of such notice will facilitate the collection of the tax liability, or With the c

Nacoleon James Hillsman, Jr., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2008-240 · 2008

ment under Section 6159 to satisfy the tax .,liability for which the lien was imposed by means of the agree- ment unless such agreement provides otherwise, i f withdrawal of such notice will facilitate the collec- tion of the tax liability, or if with the consent of the taxpayer or National Taxpayer Advocate, the, .with- drawal of the notice would not [sic] b

(d) Administrative Review.--The Secretary shall establish procedures-- - 17 - (1) for an independent administrative review of any rejection of a proposed offer-in-compromise or installment agreement made by a taxpayer under this section or section 6159 before such rejection is communicated to the taxpayer ; and (2) which allow a taxpayer to appeal any rejection of such offer or agreement to the Internal Revenue Service Office of Appeals .

Stuart Hult, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2007-302 · 2007

Section 6159 allows the Commissioner “to enter into written agreements with any taxpayer under which such taxpayer is allowed to make payment on any tax in installment payments”, if the Commissioner “determines that such agreement will facilitate full or partial collection of such liability.” We begin our consideration of petitioner’s claim that re

Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into installment agreements with taxpayers to satisfy their tax liabilities if the Commissioner determines that such agreement s will facilitate the collection of the liabilities . The IRM, together with sections 301 .6159-1, 301 .6320-1, and 301 .6330-1, Proced . & Admin . Regs ., establishes Inter

Richard Fransen, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2007-237 · 2007

ut prejudice under the following conditions : * The filing of the notice of lien was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative proce- dures of the Internal Revenue Service ; * The taxpayer had entered into an agreement under IRC § 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was imposed by means of installment payments, unless such agreement provides otherwise ; * Withdrawal of the lien will facilitate collection of the tax liability; or * Withdrawal of the lien would

James J. & Veronica L. Crisan, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2007-67 · 2007

a lien filed under this section * * * if the Secretary determines that-- (A) the filing of such notice was premature or otherwise not in accordance with administrative procedures of the Secretary, (B) the taxpayer has entered into an agreement under section 6159 to satisfy the tax liability for which the lien was imposed by means of installment payments, unless such agreement provides otherwise , (C) the withdrawal of such notice will facilitate the collection of the tax liability, or (D) with t

Craig I. & Mary Lou Smith, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2007-221 · 2007

Section 6159 authorizes the Secretary to enter into installment agreements and to terminate an installment agreement where the taxpayer fails to timely pay any installment when it is due or to pay any other tax liability when it is due . Sec . 6159(b)(4) . Termination by the Secretary requires notice to the taxpayer, not later than 30 days before t

re the IRS Office of Appeals, provided: “The Secretary is authorized to enter into written agreements with any taxpayer under which such taxpayer is allowed to satisfy liability for payment of any tax in installment payments if the Secretary determines that such agreement will facilitate collection of such liability.” Regulations promulgated under section 6159 grant to the IRS discretion to accept or reject any proposed installment agreement.

- 18 - As relevant herein, section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into an installment agreement with taxpayers to satisfy their tax liabilities if the Commissioner determines that such agreements will facilitate the collection of the liability .' Sections 301 .6159-1, 301 .6320-1, and 301 .6330-1, Proced .

Background on Proposed Installment Agreements Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into installment agreements with taxpayers to satisfy their tax liabilities if the Commissioner determines that such agreements will facilitate the collection of the liability.

Background on Proposed Installment Agreements Section 6159 authorizes the Commissioner to enter into installment agreements with taxpayers to satisfy their tax liabilities if the Commissioner determines that such agreements will facilitate the collection of the liability.

Alan L. Poe, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2005-107 · 2005

At the hearing you were given the opportunity to dis- cuss or submit alternatives to the collection actions such as an Installment Agreement under IRC §6159 or an Offer In Compromise under IRC §7122.

301.6159-1, Proced. & Admin. Regs.; 2 Administration, Internal Revenue Manual (CCH), sec. 5.19.1.5.4.1 at 18,299-65; Form 433-D, Installment Agreement; see also Crisan v. Commissioner, supra; Martin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003- 288. Respondent's determination was based on information provided by petitioner and Mrs. Nicol to the

Gwendolyn A. Ewing, Petitioner 122 T.C. No. 2 · 2004

The majority finds nothing to establish petitioner’s evaluations of the probabilities that: (1) The proposed installment agreement would be accepted or (2) Mr. Wiwi could immediately pay the unpaid tax if the proposed installment agreement were rejected. Indeed, the majority’s failure to find that an installment agreement was accepted le

Ewing v. Commissioner 122 T.C. 32 · 2004

The majority finds nothing to establish petitioner’s evaluations of the probabilities that: (1) The proposed installment agreement would be accepted or (2) Mr. Wiwi could immediately pay the unpaid tax if the proposed installment agreement were rejected. Indeed, the majority’s failure to find that an installment agreement was accepted le

f the taxpayer continues to dispute the underlying liability.5 After all, an installment payment agreement contemplates payment of an amount acknowledged as owed. See Internal Revenue Manual 5.19.1.5.4.1; Form 433-D, Installment Agreement; see also sec. 6159; sec. 301.6159-1, Proced. & Admin. Regs. In sum, petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the proposed levy action is inappropriate, that another collection alternative is more appropriate, or that some other relevant issue adversely affe

Alfred J. Martin, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2003-288 · 2003

301.6159-1, Proced. & Admin. Regs.; 2 Administration, Internal Revenue Manual (CCH), 5.19.1.5.4.1, at 18,299-50; Form 433-D, Installment Agreement. Because petitioner failed to provide financial information for ¹ªWe note that the legislative history of sec. 6330 provides in part that "A taxpayer could apply for consideration of new

Donald G. & Claudia A. Willis, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2003-302 · 2003

Installment Agreement Section 6159 authorizes respondent to consider installment agreements when a taxpayer lacks the current ability to satisfy the full amount of taxes.

perty; (ii) the procedures applicable to the levy and sale of property under this title; (iii) the administrative appeals available to the taxpayer with respect to such levy and sale and the procedures relating to such appeals; (iv) the alternatives available to taxpayers which could prevent levy on property (including installment agreements under section 6159); and (v) the provisions of this title and procedures relating to redemption of property and release of liens on property.

Offiler v. Commissioner 114 T.C. 492 · 2000

perty; (ii) the procedures applicable to the levy and sale of property under this title; (iii) the administrative appeals available to the taxpayer with respect to such levy and sale and the procedures relating to such appeals; (iv) the alternatives available to taxpayers which could prevent levy on property (including installment agreements under section 6159); and (v) the provisions of this title and procedures relating to redemption of property and release of liens on property.

Petitioners ultimately made the following payments on the indicated dates: Date Amount 6/5/96 $25,000 7/16/96 25,000 9/10/96 243 10/7/96 286 11/7/96 286 10 Respondent also assessed interest. See sec. 6601(a), (e)(1). - 16 - On October 22, 1996, respondent filed a notice of Federal tax lien in the county of petitioners' residence. Also,

Boyd v. Commissioner 124 T.C. 296 · 2005
Eichler v. Commissioner 143 T.C. 30 · 2014
Thompson v. Commissioner 140 T.C. 173 · 2013
Johna Maudi, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-57 · 2011
Thornberry v. Commissioner 136 T.C. 356 · 2011
Tucker v. Commissioner 135 T.C. 114 · 2010
Kelby v. Commissioner 130 T.C. 79 · 2008
Speltz v. Commissioner 124 T.C. 165 · 2005
Fifty Below Sales & Marketing, Inc. v. United States 497 F.3d 828 · Cir.
Schlossberg v. Barney · Cir.
Fifty Below Sales v. United States · Cir.
Tyler v. U.S. Dep't of Educ. Rehab. Servs. Admin. 904 F.3d 1167 · Cir.
Roger Schlossberg, Trustee-Appellant v. Jean Barney, Debtor-Appellee 380 F.3d 174 · Cir.
United States v. Schiller 81 F.4th 64 · Cir.