§62 — Adjusted gross income defined
160 citing cases
Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §62
For purposes of this subtitle, the term “adjusted gross income” means, in the case of an individual, gross income minus the following deductions:
The deductions allowed by this chapter (other than by part VII of this subchapter) which are attributable to a trade or business carried on by the taxpayer, if such trade or business does not consist of the performance of services by the taxpayer as an employee.
The deductions allowed by part VI (section 161 and following) which consist of expenses paid or incurred by the taxpayer, in connection with the performance by him of services as an employee, under a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement with his employer. The fact that the reimbursement may be provided by a third party shall not be determinative of whether or not the preceding sentence applies.
The deductions allowed by section 162 which consist of expenses paid or incurred by a qualified performing artist in connection with the performances by him of services in the performing arts as an employee.
The deductions allowed by section 162 which consist of expenses paid or incurred with respect to services performed by an official as an employee of a State or a political subdivision thereof in a position compensated in whole or in part on a fee basis.
The deductions allowed by section 162 which consist of expenses, not in excess of $250, paid or incurred by an eligible educator—
by reason of the participation of the educator in professional development courses related to the curriculum in which the educator provides instruction or to the students for which the educator provides instruction, and
in connection with books, supplies (other than nonathletic supplies for courses of instruction in health or physical education), computer equipment (including related software and services) and other equipment, and supplementary materials used by the eligible educator in the classroom.
The deductions allowed by section 162 which consist of expenses, determined at a rate not in excess of the rates for travel expenses (including per diem in lieu of subsistence) authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, paid or incurred by the taxpayer in connection with the performance of services by such taxpayer as a member of a reserve component of the Armed Forces of the United States for any period during which such individual is more than 100 miles away from home in connection with such services.
The deductions allowed by part VI (sec. 161 and following) as losses from the sale or exchange of property.
The deductions allowed by part VI (sec. 161 and following), by section 212 (relating to expenses for production of income), and by section 611 (relating to depletion) which are attributable to property held for the production of rents or royalties.
In the case of a life tenant of property, or an income beneficiary of property held in trust, or an heir, legatee, or devisee of an estate, the deduction for depreciation allowed by section 167 and the deduction allowed by section 611.
In the case of an individual who is an employee within the meaning of section 401(c)(1), the deduction allowed by section 404.
The deduction allowed by section 219 (relating to deduction of certain retirement savings).
The deductions allowed by section 165 for losses incurred in any transaction entered into for profit, though not connected with a trade or business, to the extent that such losses include amounts forfeited to a bank, mutual savings bank, savings and loan association, building and loan association, cooperative bank or homestead association as a penalty for premature withdrawal of funds from a time savings account, certificate of deposit, or similar class of deposit.
The deduction allowed by section 194.
The deduction allowed by section 165 for the repayment to a trust described in paragraph (9) or (17) of section 501(c) of supplemental unemployment compensation benefits received from such trust if such repayment is required because of the receipt of trade readjustment allowances under section 231 or 232 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2291 and 2292).
Any deduction allowable under this chapter by reason of an individual remitting any portion of any jury pay to such individual’s employer in exchange for payment by the employer of compensation for the period such individual was performing jury duty. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term “jury pay” means any payment received by the individual for the discharge of jury duty.
The deduction allowed by section 217.
The deduction allowed by section 220.
The deduction allowed by section 221.
The deduction allowed by section 223.
Any deduction allowable under this chapter for attorney fees and court costs paid by, or on behalf of, the taxpayer in connection with any action involving a claim of unlawful discrimination (as defined in subsection (e)) or a claim of a violation of subchapter III of chapter 37 of title 31, United States Code, or a claim made under section 1862(b)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(b)(3)(A)). The preceding sentence shall not apply to any deduction in excess of the amount includible in the taxpayer’s gross income for the taxable year on account of a judgment or settlement (whether by suit or agreement and whether as lump sum or periodic payments) resulting from such claim.
Any deduction allowable under this chapter for attorney fees and court costs paid by, or on behalf of, the taxpayer in connection with any award under—
section 7623(b), or
in the case of taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2017
, any action brought under—
section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (
15 U.S.C. 78u–6
),
a State false claims act, including a State false claims act with qui tam provisions, or
section 23 of the Commodity Exchange Act (
7 U.S.C. 26
).
Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to any deduction in excess of the amount includible in the taxpayer’s gross income for the taxable year on account of such award.
Nothing in this section shall permit the same item to be deducted more than once. Any deduction allowed by section 199A shall not be treated as a deduction described in any of the preceding paragraphs of this subsection.
For purposes of subsection (a)(2)(B), the term “qualified performing artist” means, with respect to any taxable year, any individual if—
such individual performed services in the performing arts as an employee during the taxable year for at least 2 employers,
the aggregate amount allowable as a deduction under section 162 in connection with the performance of such services exceeds 10 percent of such individual’s gross income attributable to the performance of such services, and
the adjusted gross income of such individual for the taxable year (determined without regard to subsection (a)(2)(B)) does not exceed $16,000.
An individual shall not be treated as performing services in the performing arts as an employee for any employer during any taxable year unless the amount received by such individual from such employer for the performance of such services during the taxable year equals or exceeds $200.
Except in the case of a husband and wife who lived apart at all times during the taxable year, if the taxpayer is married at the close of the taxable year, subsection (a)(2)(B) shall apply only if the taxpayer and his spouse file a joint return for the taxable year.
In the case of a joint return—
paragraph (1) (other than subparagraph (C) thereof) shall be applied separately with respect to each spouse, but
paragraph (1)(C) shall be applied with respect to their combined adjusted gross income.
For purposes of this subsection, marital status shall be determined under section 7703(a).
For purposes of this subsection, the term “joint return” means the joint return of a husband and wife made under section 6013.
For purposes of subsection (a)(2)(A), an arrangement shall in no event be treated as a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement if—
such arrangement does not require the employee to substantiate the expenses covered by the arrangement to the person providing the reimbursement, or
such arrangement provides the employee the right to retain any amount in excess of the substantiated expenses covered under the arrangement.
The substantiation requirements of the preceding sentence shall not apply to any expense to the extent that substantiation is not required under section 274(d) for such expense by reason of the regulations prescribed under the 2nd sentence thereof.
For purposes of subsection (a)(2)(D), the term “eligible educator” means, with respect to any taxable year, an individual who is a kindergarten through grade 12 teacher, instructor, counselor, principal, or aide in a school for at least 900 hours during a school year.
The term “school” means any school which provides elementary education or secondary education (kindergarten through grade 12), as determined under State law.
A deduction shall be allowed under subsection (a)(2)(D) for expenses only to the extent the amount of such expenses exceeds the amount excludable under section 135, 529(c)(1), or 530(d)(2) for the taxable year.
In the case of any taxable year beginning after 2015, the $250 amount in subsection (a)(2)(D) shall be increased by an amount equal to—
such dollar amount, multiplied by
the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which the taxable year begins, determined by substituting “calendar year 2014” for “calendar year 2016” in subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.
Any increase determined under the preceding sentence shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $50.
For purposes of subsection (a)(20), the term “unlawful discrimination” means an act that is unlawful under any of the following:
Section 302 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (
42 U.S.C. 2000e–16b
).
Section 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, or 208 of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (
2 U.S.C. 1311
, 1312, 1313, 1314, 1315, 1316, or 1317).
1
1 See References in Text note below.
The National Labor Relations Act (
29 U.S.C. 151
et seq.).
The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (
29 U.S.C. 201
et seq.).
Section 4 or 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (
29 U.S.C. 623
or 633a).
Section 501 or 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (
29 U.S.C. 791
or 794).
Section 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (
29 U.S.C. 1140
).
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (
20 U.S.C. 1681
et seq.).
The Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 (
29 U.S.C. 2001
et seq.).
The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (
29 U.S.C. 2102
et seq.).
Section 105 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (
29 U.S.C. 2615
).
Chapter 43 of title 38, United States Code (relating to employment and reemployment rights of members of the uniformed services).
Section 1977, 1979, or 1980 of the Revised Statutes (
42 U.S.C. 1981
, 1983, or 1985).
Section 703, 704, or 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (
42 U.S.C. 2000e–2
, 2000e–3, or 2000e–16).
Section 804, 805, 806, 808, or 818 of the Fair Housing Act (
42 U.S.C. 3604
, 3605, 3606, 3608, or 3617).
Section 102, 202, 302, or 503 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (
42 U.S.C. 12112
, 12132, 12182, or 12203).
Any provision of Federal law (popularly known as whistleblower protection provisions) prohibiting the discharge of an employee, the discrimination against an employee, or any other form of retaliation or reprisal against an employee for asserting rights or taking other actions permitted under Federal law.
Any provision of Federal, State, or local law, or common law claims permitted under Federal, State, or local law—
providing for the enforcement of civil rights, or
regulating any aspect of the employment relationship, including claims for wages, compensation, or benefits, or prohibiting the discharge of an employee, the discrimination against an employee, or any other form of retaliation or reprisal against an employee for asserting rights or taking other actions permitted by law.
Treasury Regulations
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1Adjusted gross income
(a)-(b) [Reserved]
(c) Deductions allowable in computing adjusted gross income. The deductions specified in section 62(a) for purposes of computing adjusted gross income are—
(1) Deductions set forth in § 1.62-1T(c); and
(2) Deductions allowable under part VI, subchapter B, chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, (section 161 and following) that consist of expenses paid or incurred by the taxpayer in connection with the performance of services as an employee under a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement (as defined in § 1.62-2) with his or her employer. For the rules pertaining to expenses paid or incurred in taxable years beginning before January 1, 1989, see § 1.62-1T (c)(2) and (f) (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 (§§ 1.61 to 1.169) revised April 1, 1992).
(d)-(h) [Reserved]
(i) Effective date. Paragraph (c) of this section is effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1989.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1(a)§1.62-1(a)
-(b) [Reserved]
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1(c)Deductions allowable in computing adjusted gross income.
Deductions allowable in computing adjusted gross income. The deductions specified in section 62(a) for purposes of computing adjusted gross income are—
(1) Deductions set forth in § 1.62-1T(c); and
(2) Deductions allowable under part VI, subchapter B, chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, (section 161 and following) that consist of expenses paid or incurred by the taxpayer in connection with the performance of services as an employee under a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement (as defined in § 1.62-2) with his or her employer. For the rules pertaining to expenses paid or incurred in taxable years beginning before January 1, 1989, see § 1.62-1T (c)(2) and (f) (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 (§§ 1.61 to 1.169) revised April 1, 1992).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1(d)§1.62-1(d)
-(h) [Reserved]
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1(i)Effective date.
Effective date. Paragraph (c) of this section is effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1989.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1TAdjusted gross income
(a) Basis for determining the amount of certain deductions. The term “adjusted gross income” means the gross income computed under section 61 minus such of the deductions allowed by chapter 1 of the Code as are specified in section 62(a). Adjusted gross income is used as the basis for determining the following:
(1) The limitation on the amount of miscellaneous itemized deductions (under section 67).
(2) The limitation on the amount of the deduction for casualty losses (under section 165(h)(2)),
(3) The limitation on the amount of the deduction for charitable contributions (under section 170(b)(1)),
(4) The limitation on the amount of the deduction for medical and dental expenses (under section 213),
(5) The limitation on the amount of the deduction for qualified retirement contributions for active participants in certain pension plans (under section 219(g)), and
(6) The phase-out of the exemption from the disallowance of passive activity losses and credits (under section 469(i)(3)).
(b) Double deduction not permitted. Section 62 (a) merely specifies which of the deductions provided in chapter 1 of the Code shall be allowed in computing adjusted gross income. It does not create any new deductions. The fact that a particular item may be described in more than one of the paragraphs under section 62(a) does not permit the item to be deducted twice in computing adjusted gross income or taxable income.
(c) Deductions allowable in computing adjusted gross income. The deductions specified in section 62(a) for purposes of computing adjusted gross income are:
(1) Deductions allowable under chapter 1 of the Code (other than by part VII (section 211 and following), subchapter B of such chapter) that are attributable to a trade or business carried on by the taxpayer not consisting of services performed as an employee;
(2) [Reserved]
(3) For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, deductions allowable under section 162 that consist of expenses paid or incurred by a qualified performing artist (as defined in section 62(b)) in connection with the performance by him or her of services in the performing arts as an employee;
(4) Deductions allowable under part VI as losses from the sale or exchange of property;
(5) Deductions allowable under part VI, section 212, or section 611 that are attributable to property held for the production of rents or royalties;
(6) Deductions for depreciation or depletion allowable under sections 167 or 611 to a life tenant of property or to an income beneficiary of property held in trust or to an heir, legatee, or devisee of an estate;
(7) Deductions allowed by section 404 for contributions on behalf of a self-employed individual;
(8) Deductions allowed by section 219 for contributions to an individual retirement account described in section 408(a), or for an individual retirement annuity described in section 408(b);
(9) Deductions allowed by section 402(e)(3) with respect to a lump-sum distribution;
(10) For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1972, deductions allowed by section 165 for losses incurred in any transaction entered into for profit though not connected with a trade or business, to the extent that such losses include amounts forfeited to a bank, mutual savings bank, savings and loan association, building and loan association, cooperative bank or homestead association as a penalty for premature withdrawal of funds from a time savings account, certificate of deposit, or similar class of deposit;
(11) For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1976, deductions for alimony and separate maintenance payments allowed by section 215;
(12) Deductions allowed by section 194 for the amortization of reforestation expenditures; and
(13) Deductions allowed by section 165 for the repayment (made in a taxable year beginning after December 28, 1980) to a trust described in paragraph (9) or (17) of section 501(c) of supplemental unemployment compensation benefits received from such trust if such repayment is required because of the receipt of trade readjustment allowances under section 231 or 232 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2291 and 2292).
(d) Expenses directly related to a trade or business. For the purpose of the deductions specified in section 62, the performance of personal services as an employee does not constitute the carrying on of a trade or business, except as otherwise expressly provided. The practice of a profession, not as an employee, is considered the conduct of a trade or business within the meaning of such section. To be deductible for the purposes of determining adjusted gross income, expenses must be those directly, and not those merely remotely, connected with the conduct of a trade or business. For example, taxes are deductible in arriving at adjusted gross income only if they constitute expenditures directly attributable to a trade or business or to property from which rents or royalties are derived. Thus, property taxes paid or incurred on real property used in a trade or business are deductible, but state taxes on net income are not deductible even though the taxpayer's income is derived from the conduct of a trade or business.
(e) Reimbursed and unreimbursed employee expenses—(1) In general. Expenses paid or incurred by an employee that are deductible from gross income under part VI in computing taxable income (determined without regard to section 67) and for which the employee is reimbursed by the employer, its agent, or third party (for whom the employee performs a benefit as an employee of the employer) under an express agreement for reimbursement or pursuant to an express expense allowance arrangement may be deducted from gross income in computing adjusted gross income. Except as provided in paragraphs (e)(2) and (e)(4) of this section, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, if the amount of a reimbursement made by an employer, its agent, or third party to an employee is less than the total amount of the business expenses paid or incurred by the employee, the determination of to which of the employee's business expenses the reimbursement applies and the amount of each expense that is covered by the reimbursement is made on the basis of all of the facts and circumstances of the particular case.
(2) Facts and circumstances unclear on business expenses for meals and entertainment. If—
(i) The facts and circumstances do not make clear—
(A) That a reimbursement does not apply to business expenses for meals or entertainment, or
(B) The amount of business expenses for meals or entertainment that is covered by the reimbursement, and
(ii) The employee pays or incurs business expenses for meals or entertainment,
the amount of the reimbursement that applies to such expenses (or portion thereof with respect to which the facts and circumstances are unclear) shall be determined by multiplying the amount of the employee's business expenses for meals and entertainment (or portion thereof with respect to which the facts and circumstances are unclear) by a fraction, the numerator of which is the total amount of the reimbursement (or portion thereof with respect to which the facts and circumstances are unclear) and the denominator of which is the aggregate amount of all the business expenses of the employee (or portion thereof with respect to which the facts and circumstances are unclear).
(3) Deductibility of unreimbursed expenses. The amount of expenses that is determined not to be reimbursed pursuant to paragraph (e) (1) or (2) of this section is deductible from adjusted gross income in determining the employee's taxable income subject to the limitations applicable to such expenses (e.g., the 2-percent floor of section 67 and the 80-percent limitation on meal and entertainment expenses provided for in section 274(n)).
(4) Unreimbursed expenses of State legislators. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, any portion of the amount allowed as a deduction to State legislators pursuant to section 162(h)1)(B) that is not reimbursed by the State or a third party shall be allocated between lodging and meals in the same ratio as the amounts allowable for lodging and meals under the Federal per diem applicable to the legislator's State capital at the end of the legislator's taxable year (see Appendix 1-A of the Federal Travel Regulations (FTR), which as of March 28, 1988, are contained in GSA Bulletin FPMR A-40, Supplement 20). For purposes of this paragraph (e)(4), the amount allowable for meals under the Federal per diem shall be the amount of the Federal per diem allowable for meals and incidental expenses reduced by $2 per legislative day (or other amount allocated to incidental expenses in 1-7.5(a)(2) of the FTR). The unreimbursed portion of each type of expense is deductible from adjusted gross income in determining the State legislator's taxable income subject to the limitations applicable to such expenses. For example, the unreimbursed portion allocable to meals shall be reduced by 20 percent pursuant to section 274(n) before being subjected to the 2-percent floor of section 67 for purposes of computing the taxable income of a State legislator. See § 1.67-1T(a)(2).
(5) Expenses paid directly by an employer, its agent, or third party. In the case of an employer, its agent, or a third party who provides property or services to an employee or who pays an employee's expenses directly instead of reimbursing the employee, see section 132 and the regulations thereunder for the income tax treatment of such expenses.
(6) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph (e) may be illustrated by the following examples:
(f) [Reserved]
(g) Moving expenses. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, a taxpayer described in section 217(a) shall not take into account the deduction described in section 217 relating to moving expenses in computing adjusted gross income under section 62 even if the taxpayer is reimbursed for his or her moving expenses. Such a taxpayer shall include the amount of any reimbursement for moving expenses in income pursuant to section 82. The deduction described in section 217 shall be taken into account in computing the taxable income of the taxpayer under section 63. Pursuant to section 67(b)(6), the 2-percent floor described in section 67(a) does not apply to moving expenses.
(h) Cross-reference. See 26 CFR 1.62-1 (Rev. as of April 1, 1986) with respect to pre-1987 deductions for travel, meal, lodging, transportation, and other trade or business expenses of an employee, reimbursed expenses of an employee, expenses of an outside salesperson, long-term capital gains, contributions described in section 405(c) to a bond purchase plan on behalf of a self-employed individual, moving expenses, amounts not received as benefits pursuant to section 1379(b)(3), and retirement bonds described in section 409 (allowed by section 219).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1T(a)Basis for determining the amount of certain deductions.
Basis for determining the amount of certain deductions. The term “adjusted gross income” means the gross income computed under section 61 minus such of the deductions allowed by chapter 1 of the Code as are specified in section 62(a). Adjusted gross income is used as the basis for determining the following:
(1) The limitation on the amount of miscellaneous itemized deductions (under section 67).
(2) The limitation on the amount of the deduction for casualty losses (under section 165(h)(2)),
(3) The limitation on the amount of the deduction for charitable contributions (under section 170(b)(1)),
(4) The limitation on the amount of the deduction for medical and dental expenses (under section 213),
(5) The limitation on the amount of the deduction for qualified retirement contributions for active participants in certain pension plans (under section 219(g)), and
(6) The phase-out of the exemption from the disallowance of passive activity losses and credits (under section 469(i)(3)).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1T(b)Double deduction not permitted.
Double deduction not permitted. Section 62 (a) merely specifies which of the deductions provided in chapter 1 of the Code shall be allowed in computing adjusted gross income. It does not create any new deductions. The fact that a particular item may be described in more than one of the paragraphs under section 62(a) does not permit the item to be deducted twice in computing adjusted gross income or taxable income.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1T(c)Deductions allowable in computing adjusted gross income.
Deductions allowable in computing adjusted gross income. The deductions specified in section 62(a) for purposes of computing adjusted gross income are:
(1) Deductions allowable under chapter 1 of the Code (other than by part VII (section 211 and following), subchapter B of such chapter) that are attributable to a trade or business carried on by the taxpayer not consisting of services performed as an employee;
(2) [Reserved]
(3) For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, deductions allowable under section 162 that consist of expenses paid or incurred by a qualified performing artist (as defined in section 62(b)) in connection with the performance by him or her of services in the performing arts as an employee;
(4) Deductions allowable under part VI as losses from the sale or exchange of property;
(5) Deductions allowable under part VI, section 212, or section 611 that are attributable to property held for the production of rents or royalties;
(6) Deductions for depreciation or depletion allowable under sections 167 or 611 to a life tenant of property or to an income beneficiary of property held in trust or to an heir, legatee, or devisee of an estate;
(7) Deductions allowed by section 404 for contributions on behalf of a self-employed individual;
(8) Deductions allowed by section 219 for contributions to an individual retirement account described in section 408(a), or for an individual retirement annuity described in section 408(b);
(9) Deductions allowed by section 402(e)(3) with respect to a lump-sum distribution;
(10) For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1972, deductions allowed by section 165 for losses incurred in any transaction entered into for profit though not connected with a trade or business, to the extent that such losses include amounts forfeited to a bank, mutual savings bank, savings and loan association, building and loan association, cooperative bank or homestead association as a penalty for premature withdrawal of funds from a time savings account, certificate of deposit, or similar class of deposit;
(11) For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1976, deductions for alimony and separate maintenance payments allowed by section 215;
(12) Deductions allowed by section 194 for the amortization of reforestation expenditures; and
(13) Deductions allowed by section 165 for the repayment (made in a taxable year beginning after December 28, 1980) to a trust described in paragraph (9) or (17) of section 501(c) of supplemental unemployment compensation benefits received from such trust if such repayment is required because of the receipt of trade readjustment allowances under section 231 or 232 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2291 and 2292).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1T(d)Expenses directly related to a trade or business.
Expenses directly related to a trade or business. For the purpose of the deductions specified in section 62, the performance of personal services as an employee does not constitute the carrying on of a trade or business, except as otherwise expressly provided. The practice of a profession, not as an employee, is considered the conduct of a trade or business within the meaning of such section. To be deductible for the purposes of determining adjusted gross income, expenses must be those directly, and not those merely remotely, connected with the conduct of a trade or business. For example, taxes are deductible in arriving at adjusted gross income only if they constitute expenditures directly attributable to a trade or business or to property from which rents or royalties are derived. Thus, property taxes paid or incurred on real property used in a trade or business are deductible, but state taxes on net income are not deductible even though the taxpayer's income is derived from the conduct of a trade or business.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1T(e)Reimbursed and unreimbursed employee expenses—(1) In general.
Reimbursed and unreimbursed employee expenses—(1) In general. Expenses paid or incurred by an employee that are deductible from gross income under part VI in computing taxable income (determined without regard to section 67) and for which the employee is reimbursed by the employer, its agent, or third party (for whom the employee performs a benefit as an employee of the employer) under an express agreement for reimbursement or pursuant to an express expense allowance arrangement may be deducted from gross income in computing adjusted gross income. Except as provided in paragraphs (e)(2) and (e)(4) of this section, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, if the amount of a reimbursement made by an employer, its agent, or third party to an employee is less than the total amount of the business expenses paid or incurred by the employee, the determination of to which of the employee's business expenses the reimbursement applies and the amount of each expense that is covered by the reimbursement is made on the basis of all of the facts and circumstances of the particular case.
(2) Facts and circumstances unclear on business expenses for meals and entertainment. If—
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1T(f)§1.62-1T(f)
[Reserved]
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1T(g)Moving expenses.
Moving expenses. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, a taxpayer described in section 217(a) shall not take into account the deduction described in section 217 relating to moving expenses in computing adjusted gross income under section 62 even if the taxpayer is reimbursed for his or her moving expenses. Such a taxpayer shall include the amount of any reimbursement for moving expenses in income pursuant to section 82. The deduction described in section 217 shall be taken into account in computing the taxable income of the taxpayer under section 63. Pursuant to section 67(b)(6), the 2-percent floor described in section 67(a) does not apply to moving expenses.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1T(h)Cross-reference.
Cross-reference. See 26 CFR 1.62-1 (Rev. as of April 1, 1986) with respect to pre-1987 deductions for travel, meal, lodging, transportation, and other trade or business expenses of an employee, reimbursed expenses of an employee, expenses of an outside salesperson, long-term capital gains, contributions described in section 405(c) to a bond purchase plan on behalf of a self-employed individual, moving expenses, amounts not received as benefits pursuant to section 1379(b)(3), and retirement bonds described in section 409 (allowed by section 219).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-1T(i)§1.62-1T(i)
The facts and circumstances do not make clear—
(A) That a reimbursement does not apply to business expenses for meals or entertainment, or
(B) The amount of business expenses for meals or entertainment that is covered by the reimbursement, and
(ii) The employee pays or incurs business expenses for meals or entertainment,
the amount of the reimbursement that applies to such expenses (or portion thereof with respect to which the facts and circumstances are unclear) shall be determined by multiplying the amount of the employee's business expenses for meals and entertainment (or portion thereof with respect to which the facts and circumstances are unclear) by a fraction, the numerator of which is the total amount of the reimbursement (or portion thereof with respect to which the facts and circumstances are unclear) and the denominator of which is the aggregate amount of all the business expenses of the employee (or portion thereof with respect to which the facts and circumstances are unclear).
(3) Deductibility of unreimbursed expenses. The amount of expenses that is determined not to be reimbursed pursuant to paragraph (e) (1) or (2) of this section is deductible from adjusted gross income in determining the employee's taxable income subject to the limitations applicable to such expenses (e.g., the 2-percent floor of section 67 and the 80-percent limitation on meal and entertainment expenses provided for in section 274(n)).
(4) Unreimbursed expenses of State legislators. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, any portion of the amount allowed as a deduction to State legislators pursuant to section 162(h)1)(B) that is not reimbursed by the State or a third party shall be allocated between lodging and meals in the same ratio as the amounts allowable for lodging and meals under the Federal per diem applicable to the legislator's State capital at the end of the legislator's taxable year (see Appendix 1-A of the Federal Travel Regulations (FTR), which as of March 28, 1988, are contained in GSA Bulletin FPMR A-40, Supplement 20). For purposes of this paragraph (e)(4), the amount allowable for meals under the Federal per diem shall be the amount of the Federal per diem allowable for meals and incidental expenses reduced by $2 per legislative day (or other amount allocated to incidental expenses in 1-7.5(a)(2) of the FTR). The unreimbursed portion of each type of expense is deductible from adjusted gross income in determining the State legislator's taxable income subject to the limitations applicable to such expenses. For example, the unreimbursed portion allocable to meals shall be reduced by 20 percent pursuant to section 274(n) before being subjected to the 2-percent floor of section 67 for purposes of computing the taxable income of a State legislator. See § 1.67-1T(a)(2).
(5) Expenses paid directly by an employer, its agent, or third party. In the case of an employer, its agent, or a third party who provides property or services to an employee or who pays an employee's expenses directly instead of reimbursing the employee, see section 132 and the regulations thereunder for the income tax treatment of such expenses.
(6) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph (e) may be illustrated by the following examples:
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-2Reimbursements and other expense allowance arrangements
(a) Table of contents. The contents of this section are as follows:
(a) Table of contents.
(b) Scope.
(c) Reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement.
(1) Defined.
(2) Accountable plans.
(i) In general.
(ii) Special rule for failure to return excess.
(3) Nonaccountable plans.
(i) In general.
(ii) Special rule for failure to return excess.
(4) Treatment of payments under accountable plans.
(5) Treatment of payments under nonaccountable plans.
(d) Business connection.
(1) In general.
(2) Other bona fide expenses.
(3) Reimbursement requirement.
(i) In general.
(ii) Per diem allowances.
(e) Substantiation.
(1) In general.
(2) Expenses governed by section 274(d).
(3) Expenses not governed by section 274(d).
(f) Returning amounts in excess of expenses.
(1) In general.
(2) Per diem or mileage allowances.
(g) Reasonable period.
(1) In general.
(2) Safe harbors.
(i) Fixed date method.
(ii) Periodic payment method.
(3) Pattern of overreimbursements.
(h) Withholding and payment of employment taxes.
(1) When excluded from wages.
(2) When included in wages.
(i) Accountable plans.
(A) General rule.
(B) Per diem or mileage allowances.
(1) In general.
(2) Reimbursements.
(3) Advances.
(4) Special rules.
(ii) Nonaccountable plans.
(i) Application.
(j) Examples.
(k) Anti-abuse provision.
(l) Cross references.
(m) Effective dates.
(b) Scope. For purposes of determining “adjusted gross income,” section 62(a)(2)(A) allows an employee a deduction for expenses allowed by part VI (section 161 and following), subchapter B, chapter 1 of the Code, paid by the employee, in connection with the performance of services as an employee of the employer, under a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement with a payor (the employer, its agent, or a third party). Section 62(c) provides that an arrangement will not be treated as a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement for purposes of section 62(a)(2)(A) if—
(1) Such arrangement does not require the employee to substantiate the expenses covered by the arrangement to the payor, or
(2) Such arrangement provides the employee the right to retain any amount in excess of the substantiated expenses covered under the arrangement.
This section prescribes rules relating to the requirements of section 62(c).
(c) Reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement—(1) Defined. For purposes of §§ 1.62-1, 1.62-1T, and 1.62-2, the phrase “reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement” means an arrangement that meets the requirements of paragraphs (d) (business connection, (e) (substantiation), and (f) (returning amounts in excess of expenses) of this section. A payor may have more than one arrangement with respect to a particular employee, depending on the facts and circumstances. See paragraph (d)(2) of this section (payor treated as having two arrangements under certain circumstances).
(2) Accountable plans—(i) In general. Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section, if an arrangement meets the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section, all amounts paid under the arrangement are treated as paid under an “accountable plan.”
(ii) Special rule for failure to return excess. If an arrangement meets the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section, but the employee fails to return, within a reasonable period of time, any amount in excess of the amount of the expenses substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section, only the amounts paid under the arrangement that are not in excess of the substantiated expenses are treated as paid under an accountable plan.
(3) Nonaccountable plans—(i) In general. If an arrangement does not satisfy one or more of the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), or (f) of this section, all amounts paid under the arrangement are treated as paid under a “nonaccountable plan.” If a payor provides a nonaccountable plan, an employee who receives payments under the plan cannot compel the payor to treat the payments as paid under an accountable plan by voluntarily substantiating the expenses and returning any excess to the payor.
(ii) Special rule for failure to return excess. If an arrangement meets the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section, but the employee fails to return, within a reasonable period of time, any amount in excess of the amount of the expenses substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section, the amounts paid under the arrangement that are in excess of the substantiated expenses are treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan.
(4) Treatment of payments under accountable plans. Amounts treated as paid under an accountable plan are excluded from the employee's gross income, are not reported as wages or other compensation on the employee's Form W-2, and are exempt from the withholding and payment of employment taxes (Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA), Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA), Railroad Retirement Tax Act (RRTA), Railroad Unemployment Repayment Tax (RURT), and income tax.) See paragraph (l) of this section for cross references.
(5) Treatment of payments under nonaccountable plans. Amounts treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan are included in the employee's gross income, must be reported as wages or other compensation on the employee's Form W-2, and are subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes (FICA, FUTA, RRTA, RURT, and income tax). See paragraph (h) of this section. Expenses attributable to amounts included in the employee's gross income may be deducted, provided the employee can substantiate the full amount of his or her expenses (i.e., the amount of the expenses, if any, the reimbursement for which is treated as paid under an accountable plan as well as those for which the employee is claiming the deduction) in accordance with §§ 1.274-5T and 1.274(d)-1 or § 1.162-17, but only as a miscellaneous itemized deduction subject to the limitations applicable to such expenses (e.g., the 80-percent limitation on meal and entertainment expenses provided in section 274(n) and the 2-percent floor provided in section 67).
(d) Business connection—(1) In general. Except as provided in paragraphs (d)(2) and (d)(3) of this section, an arrangement meets the requirements of this paragraph (d) if it provides advances, allowances (including per diem allowances, allowances only for meals and incidental expenses, and mileage allowances), or reimbursements only for business expenses that are allowable as deductions by part VI (section 161 and the following), subchapter B, chapter 1 of the Code, and that are paid or incurred by the employee in connection with the performance of services as an employee of the employer. The payment may be actually received from the employer, its agent, or a third party for whom the employee performs a service as an employee of the employer, and may include amounts charged directly or indirectly to the payor through credit card systems or otherwise. In addition, if both wages and the reimbursement or other expense allowance are combined in a single payment, the reimbursement or other expense allowance must be identified either by making a separate payment or by specifically identifying the amount of the reimbursement or other expense allowance.
(2) Other bona fide expenses. If an arrangement provides advances, allowances, or reimbursements for business expenses described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section (i.e., deductible employee business expenses) and for other bona fide expenses related to the employer's business (e.g., travel that is not away from home) that are not deductible under part VI (section 161 and the following), subchapter B, chapter 1 of the Code, the payor is treated as maintaining two arrangements. The portion of the arrangement that provides payments for the deductible employee business expenses is treated as one arrangement that satisfies this paragraph (d). The portion of the arrangement that provides payments for the nondeductible employee expenses is treated as a second arrangement that does not satisfy this paragraph (d) and all amounts paid under this second arrangement will be treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan. See paragraphs (c)(5) and (h) of this section.
(3) Reimbursement requirement—(i) In general. If a payor arranges to pay an amount to an employee regardless of whether the employee incurs (or is reasonably expected to incur) business expenses of a type described in paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this section, the arrangement does not satisfy this paragraph (d) and all amounts paid under the arrangement are treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan. See paragraphs (c)(5) and (h) of this section.
(ii) Per diem allowances. An arrangement providing a per diem allowance for travel expenses of a type described in paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this section that is computed on a basis similar to that used in computing the employee's wages or other compensation (e.g., the number of hours worked, miles traveled, or pieces produced) meets the requirements of this paragraph (d) only if, on December 12, 1989, the per diem allowance was identified by the payor either by making a separate payment or by specifically identifying the amount of the per diem allowance, or a per diem allowance computed on that basis was commonly used in the industry in which the employee is employed. See section 274(d) and § 1.274(d)-1. A per diem allowance described in this paragraph (d)(3)(ii) may be adjusted in a manner that reasonably reflects actual increases in employee business expenses occurring after December 12, 1989.
(e) Substantiation—(1) In general. An arrangement meets the requirements of this paragraph (e) if it requires each business expense to be substantiated to the payor in accordance with paragraph (e)(2) or (e)(3) of this section, whichever is applicable, within a reasonable period of time. See § 1.274-5T or § 1.162-17.
(2) Expenses governed by section 274(d). An arrangement that reimburses travel, entertainment, use of a passenger automobile or other listed property, or other business expenses governed by section 274(d) meets the requirements of this paragraph (e)(2) if information sufficient to satisfy the substantiation requirements of section 274(d) and the regulations thereunder is submitted to the payor. See § 1.274-5. Under section 274(d), information sufficient to substantiate the requisite elements of each expenditure or use must be submitted to the payor. For example, with respect to travel away from home, § 1.274-5(b)(2) requires that information sufficient to substantiate the amount, time, place, and business purpose of the expense must be submitted to the payor. Similarly, with respect to use of a passenger automobile or other listed property, § 1.274-5(b)(6) requires that information sufficient to substantiate the amount, time, use, and business purpose of the expense must be submitted to the payor. See § 1.274-5(g) and (j), which grant the Commissioner the authority to establish optional methods of substantiating certain expenses. Substantiation of the amount of a business expense in accordance with rules prescribed pursuant to the authority granted by § 1.274-5(g) or (j) will be treated as substantiation of the amount of such expense for purposes of this section.
(3) Expenses not governed by section 274(d). An arrangement that reimburses business expenses not governed by section 274(d) meets the requirements of this paragraph (e)(3) if information is submitted to the payor sufficient to enable the payor to identify the specific nature of each expense and to conclude that the expense is attributable to the payor's business activities. Therefore, each of the elements of an expenditure or use must be substantiated to the payor. It is not sufficient if an employee merely aggregates expenses into broad categories (such as “travel”) or reports individual expenses through the use of vague, nondescriptive terms (such as “miscellaneous business expenses”). See § 1.162-17(b).
(f) Returning amounts in excess of expenses—(1) In general. Except as provided in paragraph (f)(2) of this section, an arrangement meets the requirements of this paragraph (f) if it requires the employee to return to the payor within a reasonable period of time may amount paid under the arrangement in excess of the expenses substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section. The determination of whether an arrangement requires an employee to return amounts in excess of substantiated expenses will depend on the facts and circumstances. An arrangement whereby money is advanced to an employee to defray expenses will be treated as satisfying the requirements of this paragraph (f) only if the amount of money advanced is reasonably calculated not to exceed the amount of anticipated expenditures, the advance of money is made on a day within a reasonable period of the day that the anticipated expenditures are paid or incurred, and any amounts in excess of the expenses substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section are required to be returned to the payor within a reasonable period of time after the advance is received.
(2) Per diem or mileage allowances. The Commissioner may, in his discretion, prescribe rules in pronouncements of general applicability under which a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement that provides per diem allowances providing for ordinary and necessary expenses of traveling away from home (exclusive of transportation costs to and from destination) or mileage allowances providing for ordinary and necessary expenses of local travel and tranportation while traveling away from home will be treated as satisfying the requirements of this paragraph (f), even though the arrangement does not require the employee to return the portion of such an allowance that relates to the days or miles of travel substantiated and that exceeds the amount of the employee's expenses deemed substantiated pursuant to rules prescribed under section 274(d), provided the allowance is paid at a rate for each day or mile of travel that is reasonably calculated not to exceed the amount of the employee's expenses or anticipated expenses and the employee is required to return to the payor within a reasonable period of time any portion of such allowance which relates to days or miles of travel not substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section.
(g) Reasonable period—(1) In general. The determination of a reasonable period of time will depend on the facts and circumstances.
(2) Safe harbors—(i) Fixed date method. An advance made within 30 days of when an expense is paid or incurred, an expense substantiated to the payor within 60 days after it is paid or incurred, or an amount returned to the payor within 120 days after an expense is paid or incurred will be treated as having occurred within a reasonable period of time.
(ii) Periodic statement method. If a payor provides employees with periodic statements (no less frequently than quarterly) stating the amount, if any, paid under the arrangement in excess of the expenses the employee has substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section, and requesting the employee to substantiate any additional business expenses that have not yet been substantiated (whether or not such expenses relate to the expenses with respect to which the original advance was paid) and/or to return any amounts remaining unsubstantiated within 120 days of the statement, an expense substantiated or an amount returned within that period will be treated as being substantiated or returned within a reasonable period of time.
(3) Pattern of overreimbursements. If, under a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement, a payor has a plan or practice to provide amounts to employees in excess of expenses substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section and to avoid reporting and withholding on such amounts, the payor may not use either of the safe harbors provided in paragraph (g)(2) of this section for any years during which such plan or practice exists.
(h) Withholding and payment of employment taxes—(1) When excluded from wages. If an arrangement meets the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section, the amounts paid under the arrangement that are not in excess of the expenses substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section (i.e., the amounts treated as paid under an accountable plan) are not wages and are not subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes. If an arrangement provides advances, allowances, or reimbursements for meal and entertainment expenses and a portion of the payment is treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan under paragraph (d)(2) of this section due solely to section 274(n), then notwithstanding paragraph (h)(2)(ii) of this section, these nondeductible amounts are neither treated as gross income nor subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes.
(2) When included in wages—(i) Accountable plans—(A) General rule. Except as provided in paragraph (h)(2)(i)(B) of this section, if the expenses covered under an arrangement that meets the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section are not substantiated to the payor in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section within a reasonable period of time or if any amounts in excess of the substantiated expenses are not returned to the payor in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section within a reasonable period of time, the amount which is treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan under paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section is subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes no later than the first payroll period following the end of the reasonable period. A payor may treat any amount not substantiated or returned within the periods specified in paragraph (g)(2) of this section as not substantiated or returned within a reasonable period of time.
(B) Per diem or mileage allowances—(1) In general. If a payor pays a per diem or mileage allowance under an arrangement that meets the requirements of the paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section, the portion, if any, of the allowance paid that relates to days or miles of travel substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section and that exceeds the amount of the employee's expenses deemed substantiated for such travel pursuant to rules prescribed under section 274(d) and § 1.274(d)-1 or § 1.274-5T(j) is treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan. See paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section. Because the employee is not required to return this excess portion, the reasonable period of time provisions of paragraph (g) of this section (relating to the return of excess amounts) do not apply to this excess portion.
(2) Reimbursements. Except as provided in paragraph (h)(2)(i)(B)(4) of this section, in the case of a per diem or mileage allowance paid as a reimbursement at a rate for each day or mile of travel that exceeds the amounts of the employee's expenses deemed substantiated for a day or mile of travel, the excess portion described in paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this section is subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes in the payroll period in which the payor reimburses the expenses for the days or miles of travel substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section.
(3) Advances. Except as provided in paragraph (h)(2)(i)(B)(4) of this section, in the case of a per diem or mileage allowance paid as an advance at a rate for each day or mile of travel that exceeds the amount of the employee's expenses deemed substantiated for a day or mile of travel, the excess portion described in paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this section is subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes no later than the first payroll period following the payroll period in which the expenses with respect to which the advance was paid (i.e., the days or miles of travel) are substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section. The expenses with respect to which the advance was paid must be substantiated within a reasonable period of time. See paragraph (g) of this section.
(4) Special rules. The Commissioner may, in his discretion, prescribe special rules in pronouncements of general applicability regarding the timing of withholding and payment of employment taxes on per diem and mileage allowances.
(ii) Nonaccountable plans. If an arrangement does not satisfy one or more of the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), or (f) of this section, all amounts paid under the arrangement are wages and are subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes when paid.
(i) Application. The requirements of paragraphs (d) (business connection), (e) (substantiation), and (f) (returning amounts in excess of expenses) of this section will be applied on an employee-by-employee basis. Thus, for example, the failure by one employee to substantiate expenses under an arrangement in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section will not cause amounts paid to other employees to be treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan.
(j) Examples. The rules contained in this section may be illustrated by the following examples:
(k) Anti-abuse provision. If a payor's reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement evidences a pattern of abuse of the rules of section 62(c) and this section, all payments made under the arrangement will be treated as made under a nonaccountable plan.
(l) Cross references. For employment tax regulations relating to reimbursement and expense allowance arrangements, see §§ 31.3121 (a)-3, 31.3231(e)-(3), 31.3306(b)-2, and 31.3401(a)-4, which generally apply to payments made under reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangements received by an employee on or after July 1, 1990 with respect to expenses paid or incurred on or after July 1, 1990. For reporting requirements, see § 1.6041-3(i), which generally applies to payments made under reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangements received by an employee on or after January 1, 1989 with respect to expenses paid or incurred on or after January 1, 1989.
(m) Effective dates. This section generally applies to payments made under reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangements received by an employee in taxable years of the employee beginning on or after January 1, 1989, with respect to expenses paid or incurred in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1989. Paragraph (h) of this section generally applies to payments made under reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangements received by an employee on or after July 1, 1990 with respect to expenses paid or incurred on or after July 1, 1990. Paragraphs (d)(3)(ii) and (h)(2)(i)(B) of this section apply to payments made under reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangements received by an employee on or after January 1, 1991 with respect to expenses paid or incurred on or after January 1, 1991. Paragraph (e)(2) of this section applies to payments made under reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangements received by an employee with respect to expenses paid or incurred after December 31, 1997.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-2(a)Table of contents.
Table of contents.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-2(b)Scope.
Scope. For purposes of determining “adjusted gross income,” section 62(a)(2)(A) allows an employee a deduction for expenses allowed by part VI (section 161 and following), subchapter B, chapter 1 of the Code, paid by the employee, in connection with the performance of services as an employee of the employer, under a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement with a payor (the employer, its agent, or a third party). Section 62(c) provides that an arrangement will not be treated as a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement for purposes of section 62(a)(2)(A) if—
(1) Such arrangement does not require the employee to substantiate the expenses covered by the arrangement to the payor, or
(2) Such arrangement provides the employee the right to retain any amount in excess of the substantiated expenses covered under the arrangement.
This section prescribes rules relating to the requirements of section 62(c).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-2(c)Reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement—(1) Defined.
Reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement—(1) Defined. For purposes of §§ 1.62-1, 1.62-1T, and 1.62-2, the phrase “reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement” means an arrangement that meets the requirements of paragraphs (d) (business connection, (e) (substantiation), and (f) (returning amounts in excess of expenses) of this section. A payor may have more than one arrangement with respect to a particular employee, depending on the facts and circumstances. See paragraph (d)(2) of this section (payor treated as having two arrangements under certain circumstances).
(2) Accountable plans—(i) In general. Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section, if an arrangement meets the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section, all amounts paid under the arrangement are treated as paid under an “accountable plan.”
(ii) Special rule for failure to return excess. If an arrangement meets the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section, but the employee fails to return, within a reasonable period of time, any amount in excess of the amount of the expenses substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section, only the amounts paid under the arrangement that are not in excess of the substantiated expenses are treated as paid under an accountable plan.
(3) Nonaccountable plans—(i) In general. If an arrangement does not satisfy one or more of the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), or (f) of this section, all amounts paid under the arrangement are treated as paid under a “nonaccountable plan.” If a payor provides a nonaccountable plan, an employee who receives payments under the plan cannot compel the payor to treat the payments as paid under an accountable plan by voluntarily substantiating the expenses and returning any excess to the payor.
(ii) Special rule for failure to return excess. If an arrangement meets the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section, but the employee fails to return, within a reasonable period of time, any amount in excess of the amount of the expenses substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section, the amounts paid under the arrangement that are in excess of the substantiated expenses are treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan.
(4) Treatment of payments under accountable plans. Amounts treated as paid under an accountable plan are excluded from the employee's gross income, are not reported as wages or other compensation on the employee's Form W-2, and are exempt from the withholding and payment of employment taxes (Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA), Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA), Railroad Retirement Tax Act (RRTA), Railroad Unemployment Repayment Tax (RURT), and income tax.) See paragraph (l) of this section for cross references.
(5) Treatment of payments under nonaccountable plans. Amounts treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan are included in the employee's gross income, must be reported as wages or other compensation on the employee's Form W-2, and are subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes (FICA, FUTA, RRTA, RURT, and income tax). See paragraph (h) of this section. Expenses attributable to amounts included in the employee's gross income may be deducted, provided the employee can substantiate the full amount of his or her expenses (i.e., the amount of the expenses, if any, the reimbursement for which is treated as paid under an accountable plan as well as those for which the employee is claiming the deduction) in accordance with §§ 1.274-5T and 1.274(d)-1 or § 1.162-17, but only as a miscellaneous itemized deduction subject to the limitations applicable to such expenses (e.g., the 80-percent limitation on meal and entertainment expenses provided in section 274(n) and the 2-percent floor provided in section 67).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-2(d)Business connection—(1) In general.
Business connection—(1) In general. Except as provided in paragraphs (d)(2) and (d)(3) of this section, an arrangement meets the requirements of this paragraph (d) if it provides advances, allowances (including per diem allowances, allowances only for meals and incidental expenses, and mileage allowances), or reimbursements only for business expenses that are allowable as deductions by part VI (section 161 and the following), subchapter B, chapter 1 of the Code, and that are paid or incurred by the employee in connection with the performance of services as an employee of the employer. The payment may be actually received from the employer, its agent, or a third party for whom the employee performs a service as an employee of the employer, and may include amounts charged directly or indirectly to the payor through credit card systems or otherwise. In addition, if both wages and the reimbursement or other expense allowance are combined in a single payment, the reimbursement or other expense allowance must be identified either by making a separate payment or by specifically identifying the amount of the reimbursement or other expense allowance.
(2) Other bona fide expenses. If an arrangement provides advances, allowances, or reimbursements for business expenses described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section (i.e., deductible employee business expenses) and for other bona fide expenses related to the employer's business (e.g., travel that is not away from home) that are not deductible under part VI (section 161 and the following), subchapter B, chapter 1 of the Code, the payor is treated as maintaining two arrangements. The portion of the arrangement that provides payments for the deductible employee business expenses is treated as one arrangement that satisfies this paragraph (d). The portion of the arrangement that provides payments for the nondeductible employee expenses is treated as a second arrangement that does not satisfy this paragraph (d) and all amounts paid under this second arrangement will be treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan. See paragraphs (c)(5) and (h) of this section.
(3) Reimbursement requirement—(i) In general. If a payor arranges to pay an amount to an employee regardless of whether the employee incurs (or is reasonably expected to incur) business expenses of a type described in paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this section, the arrangement does not satisfy this paragraph (d) and all amounts paid under the arrangement are treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan. See paragraphs (c)(5) and (h) of this section.
(ii) Per diem allowances. An arrangement providing a per diem allowance for travel expenses of a type described in paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this section that is computed on a basis similar to that used in computing the employee's wages or other compensation (e.g., the number of hours worked, miles traveled, or pieces produced) meets the requirements of this paragraph (d) only if, on December 12, 1989, the per diem allowance was identified by the payor either by making a separate payment or by specifically identifying the amount of the per diem allowance, or a per diem allowance computed on that basis was commonly used in the industry in which the employee is employed. See section 274(d) and § 1.274(d)-1. A per diem allowance described in this paragraph (d)(3)(ii) may be adjusted in a manner that reasonably reflects actual increases in employee business expenses occurring after December 12, 1989.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-2(e)Substantiation—(1) In general.
Substantiation—(1) In general. An arrangement meets the requirements of this paragraph (e) if it requires each business expense to be substantiated to the payor in accordance with paragraph (e)(2) or (e)(3) of this section, whichever is applicable, within a reasonable period of time. See § 1.274-5T or § 1.162-17.
(2) Expenses governed by section 274(d). An arrangement that reimburses travel, entertainment, use of a passenger automobile or other listed property, or other business expenses governed by section 274(d) meets the requirements of this paragraph (e)(2) if information sufficient to satisfy the substantiation requirements of section 274(d) and the regulations thereunder is submitted to the payor. See § 1.274-5. Under section 274(d), information sufficient to substantiate the requisite elements of each expenditure or use must be submitted to the payor. For example, with respect to travel away from home, § 1.274-5(b)(2) requires that information sufficient to substantiate the amount, time, place, and business purpose of the expense must be submitted to the payor. Similarly, with respect to use of a passenger automobile or other listed property, § 1.274-5(b)(6) requires that information sufficient to substantiate the amount, time, use, and business purpose of the expense must be submitted to the payor. See § 1.274-5(g) and (j), which grant the Commissioner the authority to establish optional methods of substantiating certain expenses. Substantiation of the amount of a business expense in accordance with rules prescribed pursuant to the authority granted by § 1.274-5(g) or (j) will be treated as substantiation of the amount of such expense for purposes of this section.
(3) Expenses not governed by section 274(d). An arrangement that reimburses business expenses not governed by section 274(d) meets the requirements of this paragraph (e)(3) if information is submitted to the payor sufficient to enable the payor to identify the specific nature of each expense and to conclude that the expense is attributable to the payor's business activities. Therefore, each of the elements of an expenditure or use must be substantiated to the payor. It is not sufficient if an employee merely aggregates expenses into broad categories (such as “travel”) or reports individual expenses through the use of vague, nondescriptive terms (such as “miscellaneous business expenses”). See § 1.162-17(b).
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-2(f)Returning amounts in excess of expenses—(1) In general.
Returning amounts in excess of expenses—(1) In general. Except as provided in paragraph (f)(2) of this section, an arrangement meets the requirements of this paragraph (f) if it requires the employee to return to the payor within a reasonable period of time may amount paid under the arrangement in excess of the expenses substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section. The determination of whether an arrangement requires an employee to return amounts in excess of substantiated expenses will depend on the facts and circumstances. An arrangement whereby money is advanced to an employee to defray expenses will be treated as satisfying the requirements of this paragraph (f) only if the amount of money advanced is reasonably calculated not to exceed the amount of anticipated expenditures, the advance of money is made on a day within a reasonable period of the day that the anticipated expenditures are paid or incurred, and any amounts in excess of the expenses substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section are required to be returned to the payor within a reasonable period of time after the advance is received.
(2) Per diem or mileage allowances. The Commissioner may, in his discretion, prescribe rules in pronouncements of general applicability under which a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement that provides per diem allowances providing for ordinary and necessary expenses of traveling away from home (exclusive of transportation costs to and from destination) or mileage allowances providing for ordinary and necessary expenses of local travel and tranportation while traveling away from home will be treated as satisfying the requirements of this paragraph (f), even though the arrangement does not require the employee to return the portion of such an allowance that relates to the days or miles of travel substantiated and that exceeds the amount of the employee's expenses deemed substantiated pursuant to rules prescribed under section 274(d), provided the allowance is paid at a rate for each day or mile of travel that is reasonably calculated not to exceed the amount of the employee's expenses or anticipated expenses and the employee is required to return to the payor within a reasonable period of time any portion of such allowance which relates to days or miles of travel not substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-2(g)Reasonable period—(1) In general.
Reasonable period—(1) In general. The determination of a reasonable period of time will depend on the facts and circumstances.
(2) Safe harbors—(i) Fixed date method. An advance made within 30 days of when an expense is paid or incurred, an expense substantiated to the payor within 60 days after it is paid or incurred, or an amount returned to the payor within 120 days after an expense is paid or incurred will be treated as having occurred within a reasonable period of time.
(ii) Periodic statement method. If a payor provides employees with periodic statements (no less frequently than quarterly) stating the amount, if any, paid under the arrangement in excess of the expenses the employee has substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section, and requesting the employee to substantiate any additional business expenses that have not yet been substantiated (whether or not such expenses relate to the expenses with respect to which the original advance was paid) and/or to return any amounts remaining unsubstantiated within 120 days of the statement, an expense substantiated or an amount returned within that period will be treated as being substantiated or returned within a reasonable period of time.
(3) Pattern of overreimbursements. If, under a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement, a payor has a plan or practice to provide amounts to employees in excess of expenses substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section and to avoid reporting and withholding on such amounts, the payor may not use either of the safe harbors provided in paragraph (g)(2) of this section for any years during which such plan or practice exists.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-2(h)Withholding and payment of employment taxes—(1) When excluded from wages.
Withholding and payment of employment taxes—(1) When excluded from wages. If an arrangement meets the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section, the amounts paid under the arrangement that are not in excess of the expenses substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section (i.e., the amounts treated as paid under an accountable plan) are not wages and are not subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes. If an arrangement provides advances, allowances, or reimbursements for meal and entertainment expenses and a portion of the payment is treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan under paragraph (d)(2) of this section due solely to section 274(n), then notwithstanding paragraph (h)(2)(ii) of this section, these nondeductible amounts are neither treated as gross income nor subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes.
(2) When included in wages—(i) Accountable plans—(A) General rule. Except as provided in paragraph (h)(2)(i)(B) of this section, if the expenses covered under an arrangement that meets the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section are not substantiated to the payor in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section within a reasonable period of time or if any amounts in excess of the substantiated expenses are not returned to the payor in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section within a reasonable period of time, the amount which is treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan under paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section is subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes no later than the first payroll period following the end of the reasonable period. A payor may treat any amount not substantiated or returned within the periods specified in paragraph (g)(2) of this section as not substantiated or returned within a reasonable period of time.
(B) Per diem or mileage allowances—(1) In general. If a payor pays a per diem or mileage allowance under an arrangement that meets the requirements of the paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this section, the portion, if any, of the allowance paid that relates to days or miles of travel substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section and that exceeds the amount of the employee's expenses deemed substantiated for such travel pursuant to rules prescribed under section 274(d) and § 1.274(d)-1 or § 1.274-5T(j) is treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan. See paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section. Because the employee is not required to return this excess portion, the reasonable period of time provisions of paragraph (g) of this section (relating to the return of excess amounts) do not apply to this excess portion.
(2) Reimbursements. Except as provided in paragraph (h)(2)(i)(B)(4) of this section, in the case of a per diem or mileage allowance paid as a reimbursement at a rate for each day or mile of travel that exceeds the amounts of the employee's expenses deemed substantiated for a day or mile of travel, the excess portion described in paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this section is subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes in the payroll period in which the payor reimburses the expenses for the days or miles of travel substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section.
(3) Advances. Except as provided in paragraph (h)(2)(i)(B)(4) of this section, in the case of a per diem or mileage allowance paid as an advance at a rate for each day or mile of travel that exceeds the amount of the employee's expenses deemed substantiated for a day or mile of travel, the excess portion described in paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this section is subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes no later than the first payroll period following the payroll period in which the expenses with respect to which the advance was paid (i.e., the days or miles of travel) are substantiated in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section. The expenses with respect to which the advance was paid must be substantiated within a reasonable period of time. See paragraph (g) of this section.
(4) Special rules. The Commissioner may, in his discretion, prescribe special rules in pronouncements of general applicability regarding the timing of withholding and payment of employment taxes on per diem and mileage allowances.
(ii) Nonaccountable plans. If an arrangement does not satisfy one or more of the requirements of paragraphs (d), (e), or (f) of this section, all amounts paid under the arrangement are wages and are subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes when paid.
-
Treas. Reg. §1.62-2(i)Application.
Application. The requirements of paragraphs (d) (business connection), (e) (substantiation), and (f) (returning amounts in excess of expenses) of this section will be applied on an employee-by-employee basis. Thus, for example, the failure by one employee to substantiate expenses under an arrangement in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section will not cause amounts paid to other employees to be treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan.
160 Citing Cases
(6) Congressional authorization.--The limitation of paragraph (1) may be superseded by a legislative grant from Congress authorizing the Secretary to prescribe the effective date with respect to any regulation.
Gross income is broadly defined as “all income from whatever source derived.” See I.R.C. § 61(a); Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426, 431 (1955). Gross income includes compensation for services. See I.R.C. § 61(a)(1). Petitioner received gross income in the form of compensation from LMC for consulting services. Petitioner
Section 62(a) defines the deductions that are above-the-line deductions. Two types of above-the-line deductions are a section 162(a) deduction (i.e., ordinary-and-necessary business expenses of self- employed taxpayers) and a section 212 deduction attributable to the production of rents. See § 62(a)(1), (4). A section 163(a) deduction for interest expenses is not an above-the-line deduction under section 62(a) and is therefore an itemized deduction. § 63(d). However, an interest expense attribut
Modified AGI means the AGI, as defined by section 62, increased by three kinds of income: (i) any amount excluded from gross income under section 911 [relating to foreign earned income and housing costs for U.S.
g that acquiesced in a Tax Court decision, simplifying the complex question of when a taxpayer recognizes income on a post-donation sale of donated property. See id. at 164–73. 17 [*17] 441 (2011) (quoting J. Eaton, Handbook of Equity Jurisprudence § 62 (1901)). Even if the Rev. Proc. 2000-50 deduction lacks congressional authorization, that is, petitioner argues that it would be unfair to allow the IRS to deny a deduction it guaranteed in published guidance. Assuming arguendo that equitable est
As pertinent here, an individual’s MAGI is his or her AGI (within the meaning of section 62), increased by the amount of any Social Security benefits (as defined in section 86(d)) which were not included in gross - 10 - income under section 86.6 Sec.
Employmenttax examination The IRS examined petitioner's employment tax liabilities for the periods at issue, and its examiners determined that petitioner's travel reimbursement plan violated the accountable plan rules provided in section 62 and its accompanying regulations.
CMS claimed that the existing tool plan was an accountable plan under section 62, whereby reimbursement paid to employees for the cost oftheir own tools used on ajob was not considered wages for employment tax purposes.
36B(d)(2)(A); see also sec.
CMS claimed that the existing tool plan was an accountable plan under section 62, whereby reimbursement paid to employees for the cost oftheir own tools used on ajob was not considered wages for employment tax purposes.
A statutory employee under section 3121(d)(3) is not an employee for purposes ofsection 62 and may deduct business expenses on Schedule C.
usiness expenses on Schedules C. See Cole v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-44; Rev. Rul. 90-93, 1990-2 C.B. 33; cf. Rosato v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2010-39 (holding that a statutory employee under sec. 3121(d)(3) is not an employee for purposes ofsec. 62 and may deduct business expenses on Schedule C). ¹³The same criterion has been applied to determine whether a payment made in settlement oflitigation constitutes such a business expense. Redwood Empire Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Commissioner, 628 F
uld still be °For instance, petitioners have not contended and the evidence does not show that the bankruptcyplan payments represented payments, through the bankruptcy trustee, ofitems that are properly allowable as deductions in computing AGI under sec. 62. - 8 - [*8] significantly greater than $78,120, and so they still would be entitled to no PTC for 2014.¹° Because petitioners do not qualify for the PTC for 2014, the $6,090 excess APTC payments made on their behalfare properly included in th
An employee treated as a "statutory employee" for purposes ofemploymenttax is not an employee for purposes ofsection 62 and may report business income and expenses on Schedule C and avoid the Schedule A limitations on the deduction ofunreimbursed employee business expenses and the phaseout ofitemized deductions.3 See Rosato v.
1.36B-2(a), Income Tax Regs.; see also McGuire v.
Sponsors must satisfy a host ofobligations, including, among others: (1) maintaining their legal status and accreditation or licensure; (2) committing to provide accurate information to the Government, the public, and exchange visitors; (3) maintaining financial capability to meet their financial obligations; (4) ensuring adequate sta
ia L. Wofford, an enrolled agent, to prepare their return. -6- As prepared by Ms. Wofford, petitioners' 2010 return claimed the amount repaid to MetLife in 2011, $83,233, as a deduction in computing petitioners' adjusted gross income. See generally sec. 62. The same deduction was carried over to modified adjusted gross income (MAGI), as defined by section 86(b)(2), and it was used in computing the amount oftaxable SSD benefits under the formula set forth in section 86. See sec. 86(b)(1)(A)(i). P
Sponsors must satisfy a host ofobligations, including, among others: (1) maintaining their legal status and accreditation or licensure; (2) committing to provide accurate information to the Government, the public, and exchange visitors; (3) maintaining financial capability to meet their financial obligations; (4) ensuring adequate sta
Sponsors must satisfy a host ofobligations, including, among others: (1) maintaining their legal status and accreditation or licensure; (2) committing to provide accurate information to the Government, the public, and exchange visitors; (3) maintaining financial capability to meet their financial obligations; (4) ensuring adequate sta
ALS 146 T.C. No. 3 UNITED STATES TAX COURT MICHAEL JONES AND M. CHASTAIN JONES, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 27187-12. Filed February 9, 2016. Ps claimed above-the-line deductions under I.R.C. sec. 62 on their 2008, 2009, and 2010 tax returns for expenses related to H's position as a public official. R examined Ps' 2008, 2009, and 2010 returns and determined that while H was entitled to certain deductions for expenses, he could deduct them only as unreim
62.2 (2010) (defining Form DS-2019). The Form DS- 2019 described petitioner as a "universitypost grad medical trainee", an "alien physician", and a "research scholar" and was valid from August 10, 2009, to August 9, 2010, to reflect the dates ofthe 2009 agreement.5 ECFMG had to renew the Form DS-2019 every year for petitioner to continue in th
Below-the-line deductions, unlike above-the-line deductions, are subject to income limitations and in some instances can be deducted only to the extentthey exceed a specified floor amount. See Chu v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-110. Deductions are allowed above the line ifthey are "attributable to a trade or business carried on by the taxpayer, ifsuch trade or business does not consist of the performance ofservices by the taxpayer as an employee." Sec. 62(a)(1).
Pursuant to section 6226, petitioner, Charles C.
Gross income does not, however, include losses derived from dealings in property, as section 62, not section 61, provides for the deduction of such losses.
4Petitioner does not claim that the provisions ofsec. 7491(a) are applicable, and e proceed as though they are not. - 9 - Respondent, on the other hand, takes the positionthat the disputed deductions are taken into account by subtracting them from petitioner's adjusted gross income. According to respondent, the $60,000 legal expense is al
- 11 - [*11] and (B). Accordingly, petitioner was required to file a Federal tax return for the 2009 tax year. Under section 36A(a), an eligible individual taxpayer is allowed a credit against tax equal to the lesser of: (1) 6.2% ofthe taxpayer's earned income, or (2) $400. The credit--called the making work pay credit--starts to phase ou
7491(a); see also Higbee v.
Ifthe Commissioner "erroneouslygomputed any [such] computational adjustment", under section 6230(o)(1)(A)(i)the partner is not eligible for a prepaymentremedy but instead mustpay,the tax and file a claim for refund Another,example,.whichalso does not apply here, is presented by section 6230(c)(1)(A)(ii) As set forth in that section, iffhe Commissioner "erronèously computed any computational adjustment necessary * * * to apply to the partnei.
However, a statutory employee under section 3121(d) is not an employee for purposes ofsection 62 and may deduct business expense in full on a Schedule C.
Section 62 enumerates the deductions permitted from gross mcome. - 5 - Section 404 governs the deductibility ofan employer's contribution to an . employee pension plan. In general, an employer is permitted to deduct a . contribution to apension plan ifthe contribution satisfies section' 162 (relating to trade or business expenses) or 212 (relating
Memo. 200 -182, a fd. without The term ."qualified earned income is defined as an amount equal to the excess of (a) thé earned i comA of the spouse for the taxable year, over (b) LanA amount eq al to t e sum of the certain deductions allowable under sec. 62 and roperly allocable to or chargeable against earned income.. Sec. 221(b). Il - 54 - published opinion 12 Fed. Appx. 597 (11th Cir. 2005) . Ms. Rosen earned $5, 244. of inc me in 1984, which is less than the income that Mr. Powerstein ar:ned
A statutory employee under section 3121(d) (3) (D) is not an employee for purposes of section 62 and may deduct business expenses on Schedule C.
Memo. 200 -182, a fd. without The term ."qualified earned income is defined as an amount equal to the excess of (a) thé earned i comA of the spouse for the taxable year, over (b) LanA amount eq al to t e sum of the certain deductions allowable under sec. 62 and roperly allocable to or chargeable against earned income.. Sec. 221(b). Il - 54 - published opinion 12 Fed. Appx. 597 (11th Cir. 2005) . Ms. Rosen earned $5, 244. of inc me in 1984, which is less than the income that Mr. Powerstein ar:ned
Any substantiated expenses after the first $250 that relate to a taxpayer' s employment as a teacher will be allowed as unreimbursed employee expenses. Id. To claim a deduction for teaching supplies, it is not enough that the supplies be helpful to the students and appropriate for use in the classroom; they must also be direct
§62-18-102(3), defining the "practice of land surveying") allow land surveyors to conduct and perform drainage design and calculations required for the construction of 'subdivisions, including determining the detention and retention of - 10 - storm water as well as determining the size of ponds, basins, pipes and culverts which hold and through wh
deduct expenses incurred ~ in., the performance of, . services. on Schedule `C and -is :not.. subject to limitations imposed on miscellaneous itemized deductions . ' statutory employee under section 3121(d)(3)(D) is not an employee for purposes of.--section 62 and. may deduct-business expenses on Schedule C . See Rosemann v . .Commissioner, T.C Memo. 2009-185 ; Rev . Rul . 90-93,.199.0-2 C.B..-133 .> Petitioner does not'claim that he is a statutory., employee and, in any event, ., our determinat
62 (a) (2) (D) (certain expenses of elementary and - secondary school teachers are deductible to determine adjusted gross income). Petitioner also claimed $308 for union dues for 2005. Petitioner provided as evidence her BCPS paycheck for the 2-week period of November 12-25, 2005. The paycheck showed a biweekly deduction of $28.72 and a year-t
The line 30 deduction is authorized by section 62, Adjusted Gross Income defined .
statutory employee under section 3121(d)(3)(D) is not an employee for purposes of section 62 and may deduct business expenses on Schedule C.
62 (a) (2) (D) (certain expenses of elementary and secondary school teachers are deductible to etermine adjusted gross income) . B. Personal Living and Commuting Expenses--$13,470 Respondent also disallowed unreimbursed employee expenses consisting ofs $9,150 for rent, $2,:500 for meals, $500 for urniture rental or home furnishings, and $1, 32
A person wishing to practice engineering in Tennessee must pass two examinations prepared by NCEES — the fundamentals of engineering examination (not required with undergraduate engineering degree and 12 or more years of progressive engineering experience) and the principles and practice of engineering examination. Id. secs. 62-2-40
ts of tax,-additions to tax, and .penalties that should be included in that decision are those that appear on the Forms 4549-A lodged with the Court on September 9, 2008 ; and (cid:127) that the Court's decision should not address the restriction of section 62.13(a)-. The only dispute is as to interest .-Respondent and , Ms . Hook both maintain that the Court's decision, should not address interest, and that the IRS will thereafter be able to assess interest . Mr . Smith maintains that,the Court
Section 62.(d)(1)(A) defines an eligible educator as follows : (A) In general..--For purposes of subsection (a)(2)(D), the term "eligible educator" means, with respect to any taxable year, an individual who is a kindergarten through grade 12 teacher, instructor, counselor, principal, or aide in a school for at least 900 hours during a school year .
ttributable in whole or in part to any unreasonable error or delay by an officer or employee of the Interna l Revenue Service (acting in his official capacity) in performing a ministerial or managerial act, or (B) any payment of any tax described in section 62.12(a) to the extent that any unreasonable error or delay in such payment is attributable to such officer or employee being erroneous or dilatory in performing a ministerial or managerial act , the Secretary may abate the assessment of all
Because, as explained below, we agree with petit ner that she has satisfied the requirements of the reaso ble reliance exception, petitioner is not liable for a section 62 penalty .
iness operations; 15Generally, an employee may deduct unreimbursed employment expenses on Schedule A subject to an overall 2-percent of adjusted gross income limitation. See secs. 62(a), 67(a). A statutory employee is not an employee for purposes of sec. 62. See sec. 3121(d); Prouty v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-175. As the Court concludes, infra, that petitioner is not a statutory employee, petitioner’s expenses are subject to this overall 2-percent of adjusted gross income limitation. - 19
On the other hand, if petitioner were not in a trade or business of gambling, wagering losses, to the extent deductible under section 165(d), would be deductible as an itemized deduction in the computation of taxable income. 4 In general, sec. 165(a) allows a taxpayer to deduct “any loss sustained during the taxable year and not compensate
62Although the Thompsons purported to pay $59,545 of deficiency interest on that date (and reported that amount as deficiency interest expense on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of their 1986 return), the larger of the two checks issued for that purpose (in the amount of $34,000) was dishonored, and the Thompsons did not send a replacement ch
62Although the Thompsons purported to pay $59,545 of deficiency interest on that date (and reported that amount as deficiency interest expense on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of their 1986 return), the larger of the two checks issued for that purpose (in the amount of $34,000) was dishonored, and the Thompsons did not send a replacement ch
62Although the Thompsons purported to pay $59,545 of deficiency interest on that date (and reported that amount as deficiency interest expense on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of their 1986 return), the larger of the two checks issued for that purpose (in the amount of $34,000) was dishonored, and the Thompsons did not send a replacement ch
62Although the Thompsons purported to pay $59,545 of deficiency interest on that date (and reported that amount as deficiency interest expense on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of their 1986 return), the larger of the two checks issued for that purpose (in the amount of $34,000) was dishonored, and the Thompsons did not send a replacement ch
62Although the Thompsons purported to pay $59,545 of deficiency interest on that date (and reported that amount as deficiency interest expense on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of their 1986 return), the larger of the two checks issued for that purpose (in the amount of $34,000) was dishonored, and the Thompsons did not send a replacement ch
62Although the Thompsons purported to pay $59,545 of deficiency interest on that date (and reported that amount as deficiency interest expense on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of their 1986 return), the larger of the two checks issued for that purpose (in the amount of $34,000) was dishonored, and the Thompsons did not send a replacement ch
62Although the Thompsons purported to pay $59,545 of deficiency interest on that date (and reported that amount as deficiency interest expense on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of their 1986 return), the larger of the two checks issued for that purpose (in the amount of $34,000) was dishonored, and the Thompsons did not send a replacement ch
62Although the Thompsons purported to pay $59,545 of deficiency interest on that date (and reported that amount as deficiency interest expense on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of their 1986 return), the larger of the two checks issued for that purpose (in the amount of $34,000) was dishonored, and the Thompsons did not send a replacement ch
An individual performing services as a common law employee deducts such expenses as miscellaneous itemized deductions incurred in the performance of services as an employee but only to the extent the expenses exceed 2 percent of the employee’s adjusted gross income. Sec. 67(a). A statutory employee, on the other hand, pursuant to rulings b
62Although the Thompsons purported to pay $59,545 of deficiency interest on that date (and reported that amount as deficiency interest expense on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of their 1986 return), the larger of the two checks issued for that purpose (in the amount of $34,000) was dishonored, and the Thompsons did not send a replacement ch
62Although the Thompsons purported to pay $59,545 of deficiency interest on that date (and reported that amount as deficiency interest expense on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of their 1986 return), the larger of the two checks issued for that purpose (in the amount of $34,000) was dishonored, and the Thompsons did not send a replacement ch
62Although the Thompsons purported to pay $59,545 of deficiency interest on that date (and reported that amount as deficiency interest expense on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of their 1986 return), the larger of the two checks issued for that purpose (in the amount of $34,000) was dishonored, and the Thompsons did not send a replacement ch
he payment. See Robinson v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. 44, 54 (2002). During 1986, however, the Internal Revenue Code was amended, prospectively, to add a new section 163(h)., which repealed the deduction for personal interest. See TRA, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 62Although the Thompsons purported to pay $59,545 of deficiency interest on that date (and reported that amount as deficiency interest expense on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of their 1986 return), the larger of the two checks issued for that
62Although the Thompsons purported to pay $59,545 of deficiency interest on that date (and reported that amount as deficiency interest expense on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of their 1986 return), the larger of the two checks issued for that purpose (in the amount of $34,000) was dishonored, and the Thompsons did not send a replacement ch
Section 62 defines adjusted gross income and allows expenses of a trade or business and certain employee business expenses to be deducted from gross income. These deductions are sometimes referred to as deductions “above the line,” meaning simply that they are deducted from gross income to arrive at “adjusted gross income.” Gamblers who are engaged
Section 62 lists the deductions from gross income which are allowed for the purpose of computing adjusted gross income. Section 62(a)(1) provides the general rule that trade or business deductions are allowed for the purpose of computing adjusted gross income “if such trade or business does not consist of the performance of services by the taxpayer
We disagree with these arguments.
The Court resolves those issues on the preponderance of the evidence in the record; therefore section 7491 does not apply here.
Section 62 defines adjusted gross income as gross income minus certain deductions. Section 62(a)(2)(A) allows taxpayers to deduct from gross income amounts paid by the taxpayer "in connection with the performance by him - 8 - of services as an employee, under a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement with his employer." Expense reimbu
62A.A2-103(1)(j) and (k) (West 2003). Therefore, AYC’s exclusive right to lease Moonshadow for a 1-year period constitutes the average rental period for purposes of section 1.469-1(e)(3)(iii), Income Tax Regs. See Hairston v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-386 (holding that an arrangement where taxpayers leased equipment to their corporation, w
- 8 - Respondent relies on section 62 and the related regulations in contending that bad debt deductions in connection with the trade or business of being an employee are treated as itemized deductions.
For purposes of the income tax provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the term “adjusted gross income” is defined by section 62 as gross income less certain enumerated deductions, none of which is relevant here.
186, 254, n.6 (1962), and contends that the $16,000 ceiling in section 62 violates due process because the statute contains no provision to adjust for inflation.
Code § 62-3- 1101 et seq.) which provides for a division inter se [sic], in the manner set forth in * * * [other parts of this agreement] in the event E.E. Stone, III, or Allene W. Stone fail to change or maintain their Wills in the same manner. * * * * * * * F. POWERS OF ATTORNEY All existing powers of attorney for E.E. Stone, III and Allene W. Stone w
THE WITNESS: Well, the Internal Revenue Service is required to state what the tax is derived from under section 62-- THE COURT: That’s an argument, and it’s a frivo- lous argument, and I told you this morning and I’ll tell you now.
Code § 62-3- 1101 et seq.) which provides for a division inter se [sic], in the manner set forth in * * * [other parts of this agreement] in the event E.E. Stone, III, or Allene W. Stone fail to change or maintain their Wills in the same manner. * * * * * * * F. POWERS OF ATTORNEY All existing powers of attorney for E.E. Stone, III and Allene W. Stone w
Generally, miscellaneous itemized deductions, including business expenses under section 162, are deductible from an individual’s AGI only to the extent that the aggregate of those - 8 - deductions exceeds 2 percent of the individual’s AGI. Sec. 67. In this case, petitioner contends that her itemized deductions for business expenses are no
We hold for respondent that the fee must be treated as a miscellaneous itemized deduction.
Finally, section 61 defines gross income as “all income from whatever source derived”, unless otherwise provided. Section 61(a)(9) and (11) expressly defines gross income to include income from annuities and pensions. Therefore, petitioners’ gross income includes their conversion income. See sec. 408A(d)(3)(A), (C). Accordingly, petitioner
To be engaged in a trade or business within the meaning of section 162(a), an individual must be involved in the activity with continuity and regularity and the primary purpose for engaging in the activity must be for income and profit.
Finally, section 61 defines gross income as “all income from whatever source derived”, unless otherwise provided. Section 61(a)(9) and (11) expressly defines gross income to include income from annuities and pensions. Therefore, petitioners’ gross income includes their conversion income. See sec. 408A(d)(3)(A), (C). Accordingly, petitioner
For the reasons discussed below, we disagree with each of these arguments.
An individual performing services as an employee may deduct miscellaneous itemized deductions incurred in the performance of services as an employee only to the extent such expenses exceed 2 percent of the individual's adjusted gross income. Sec. 67(a). The deduction for business expenses under section 162 is included in miscellaneous item
egard to the judicial presumption of IRS correctness).” H. Conf. Rept. 105-599, at 240-241 (1998), 1998-3 C.B. 747, 994- 995; see Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 442 (2001). - 11 - gross income under section 61 and adjusted gross income under section 62. See Hochman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1986-24. Similarly, the $39,400 gambling winnings from the Biloxi Casino Magic is the amount reported as gambling winnings on Forms W-2G. The record does not expressly indicate whether these gross wi
The only issue is how the travel expenses are to be characterized — an issue that the section 62 regulations do not explicitly address other than by cross-referencing the regulations pursuant to which the Revenue Procedures were promulgated.
Statutory Framework Section 62 is entitled “Adjusted Gross Income Defined.” Section 62(a) defines the adjusted gross income of an individual as gross income minus deductions enumerated in the paragraphs that follow.
- 4 - used in the regulations under section 62.3 Patrick and Larry included the Form 1099-MISC nonemployee compensation on their respective Forms 2106 in conjunction with their claims for employee expenses.
an agreement entered into pursuant to section 218 of the Social Security Act.” Respondent apparently takes the position that an individual who fits within the definition of employee for FICA purposes should be treated as an employee for purposes of section 62. We disagree. In Hathaway v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-389, we held that a taxpayer described as an employee in section 3121(d)(3) is not necessarily an employee for purposes of the treatment of the taxpayer’s business expense deduction
Section 62, which defines adjusted gross income, lists the deductions from gross income which are allowed for the purpose of computing adjusted gross income. Section 62(a)(1) states the general rule that trade or business deductions are allowed for the purpose of computing adjusted gross income “if such trade or business does not consist of the per
Qualified earned income is defined as an amount equal to the excess of (a) the earned income of the spouse for the taxable year, over (b) an amount equal to the sum of certain deductions allowable under section 62 and properly allocable to or chargeable against earned income.
Qualified earned income is defined as an amount equal to the excess of (a) the earned income of the spouse for the taxable year, over (b) an amount equal to the sum of certain deductions allowable under section 62 and properly allocable to or chargeable against earned income.
e or business. See T.D. 5425, 1945 C.B. 10, 16. 4In Tanner v. Commissioner, 45 T.C. 145 (1965), affd. per curiam 363 F.2d 36 (4th Cir. 1966), the issue was decided pursuant to the provisions of sec. 62(1), I.R.C. 1954 (as amended). The provisions of sec. 62 of the 1954 Code are substantially the same as the provisions of sec. 22(n) of the 1939 Code. See id. at 147. Furthermore, sec. 62(a)(4), which is in effect for the taxable years at issue, is the same as sec. 62(5), I.R.C. 1954 (as amended).
62A.3-408 (West 1995). Delivery of the check will not perfect a monetary gift because the donor may stop payment or withdraw all the funds in the bank account, thereby effectively revoking the gift. See (continued...) - 25 - estate has failed to show that the transfers of those funds constitute nontaxable gifts. The parties agree that if the
de or business. See T.D. 5425, 1945 C.B. 10, 16. In Tanner v. Commissioner, 45 T.C. 145 (1965), affd. per curiam 363 F.2d 36 (4th Cir. 1966), the issue was decided pursuant to the provisions of sec. 62(1), I.R.C. 1954 (as amended). The provisions of sec. 62 of the 1954 Code are substantially the same as the provisions of sec. 22(n) of the 1939 Code. See id. at 147. Furthermore, sec. 62(a)(4), which is in effect for the taxable years at issue, is the same as sec. 62(5), I.R.C. 1954 (as amended).
Section 62 defines the intermediate term “adjusted gross income” minus certain defined deductions. Section 63(b) defines “taxable income” for individuals who do not itemize their deductions, as petitioners failed to do on their return document (and rejected the opportunity that we afforded them to rectify their omission), as meaning “adjusted gross
Section 62, which defines AGI, lists the deductions from gross income which are allowed for the purpose of computing AGI - 25 - (above-the-line deductions). Section 62(a)(1) states the general rule that trade or business deductions are allowed for such purpose only "if such trade or business does not consist of the performance of services by the t
1.62-2(c)(2), (4), Income Tax Regs. An accountable plan is one in which (1) the reimbursed expenses would otherwise be allowable as a deduction to the employee under part VI of subchapter B of the Internal Revenue Code (secs. 161-196), (2) the reimbursed expenses - 9 - are substantiated by the employee, and (3) the employee returns a
We reaffirmed the reasoning of Standing and Polk and, finding the factual situation indistinguishable from those cases, held the deficiency interest deductible as a business expense in determining the amount of a net operating loss carryover. Again, our reasoning was adopted by the Court of Appeals. To complete our analysis of the pre-section 163(h) situation, we note that because of explicit legislative history The standard adopted by Aaron v. Commissioner, 22 T.C. 1370 (1954), imported the sta
equired and then only if the minority partners voted as a block against Mr. Silver. Although, under New York State law, any general partner of the FC Partnership arguably had the legal authority to dissolve the partnership, see N.Y. Partnership Law sec. 62(1)(b) (McKinney 1988); see also Estate of Bischoff v. Commissioner, 69 T.C. 32, 49 (1977), we believe that such authority would have little impact on Mr. Silver's effective control of the FC Partnership. We note that neither expert considered
994 (1969), we find nothing in section 62Í4(b) that applies to the estate tax case now before us.