§6331 — Levy and distraint

183 citing cases

(a)Authority of Secretary

If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt under section 6334) belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the payment of such tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section.

(b)Seizure and sale of property

The term “levy” as used in this title includes the power of distraint and seizure by any means. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (e), a levy shall extend only to property possessed and obligations existing at the time thereof. In any case in which the Secretary may levy upon property or rights to property, he may seize and sell such property or rights to property (whether real or personal, tangible or intangible).

(c)Successive seizures

Whenever any property or right to property upon which levy has been made by virtue of subsection (a) is not sufficient to satisfy the claim of the United States for which levy is made, the Secretary may, thereafter, and as often as may be necessary, proceed to levy in like manner upon any other property liable to levy of the person against whom such claim exists, until the amount due from him, together with all expenses, is fully paid.

(d)Requirement of notice before levy
(1)In general

Levy may be made under subsection (a) upon the salary or wages or other property of any person with respect to any unpaid tax only after the Secretary has notified such person in writing of his intention to make such levy.

(2)30-day requirement

The notice required under paragraph (1) shall be—

(A)

given in person,

(B)

left at the dwelling or usual place of business of such person, or

(C)

sent by certified or registered mail to such persons’s last known address,

no less than 30 days before the day of the levy.

(3)Jeopardy

Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a levy if the Secretary has made a finding under the last sentence of subsection (a) that the collection of tax is in jeopardy.

(4)Information included with notice

The notice required under paragraph (1) shall include a brief statement which sets forth in simple and nontechnical terms—

(A)

the provisions of this title relating to levy and sale of property,

(B)

the procedures applicable to the levy and sale of property under this title,

(C)

the administrative appeals available to the taxpayer with respect to such levy and sale and the procedures relating to such appeals,

(D)

the alternatives available to taxpayers which could prevent levy on the property (including installment agreements under section 6159),

(E)

the provisions of this title relating to redemption of property and release of liens on property,

(F)

the procedures applicable to the redemption of property and the release of a lien on property under this title, and

(G)

the provisions of section 7345 relating to the certification of seriously delinquent tax debts and the denial, revocation, or limitation of passports of individuals with such debts pursuant to section 32101 of the FAST Act.

(e)Continuing levy on salary and wages

The effect of a levy on salary or wages payable to or received by a taxpayer shall be continuous from the date such levy is first made until such levy is released under section 6343.

(f)Uneconomical levy

No levy may be made on any property if the amount of the expenses which the Secretary estimates (at the time of levy) would be incurred by the Secretary with respect to the levy and sale of such property exceeds the fair market value of such property at the time of levy.

(g)Levy on appearance date of summons
(1)In general

No levy may be made on the property of any person on any day on which such person (or officer or employee of such person) is required to appear in response to a summons issued by the Secretary for the purpose of collecting any underpayment of tax.

(2)No application in case of jeopardy

This subsection shall not apply if the Secretary finds that the collection of tax is in jeopardy.

(h)Continuing levy on certain payments
(1)In general

If the Secretary approves a levy under this subsection, the effect of such levy on specified payments to or received by a taxpayer shall be continuous from the date such levy is first made until such levy is released. Notwithstanding section 6334, such continuous levy shall attach to up to 15 percent of any specified payment due to the taxpayer.

(2)Specified payment

For the purposes of paragraph (1), the term “specified payment” means—

(A)

any Federal payment other than a payment for which eligibility is based on the income or assets (or both) of a payee,

(B)

any payment described in paragraph (4), (7), (9), or (11) of section 6334(a), and

(C)

any annuity or pension payment under the Railroad Retirement Act or benefit under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act.

(3)Increase in levy for certain payments

Paragraph (1) shall be applied by substituting “100 percent” for “15 percent” in the case of any specified payment due to a vendor of property, goods, or services sold or leased to the Federal Government and by substituting “100 percent” for “15 percent” in the case of any specified payment due to a Medicare provider or supplier under title XVIII of the Social Security Act.

(i)No levy during pendency of proceedings for refund of divisible tax
(1)In general

No levy may be made under subsection (a) on the property or rights to property of any person with respect to any unpaid divisible tax during the pendency of any proceeding brought by such person in a proper Federal trial court for the recovery of any portion of such divisible tax which was paid by such person if—

(A)

the decision in such proceeding would be res judicata with respect to such unpaid tax; or

(B)

such person would be collaterally estopped from contesting such unpaid tax by reason of such proceeding.

(2)Divisible tax

For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “divisible tax” means—

(A)

any tax imposed by subtitle C; and

(B)

the penalty imposed by section 6672 with respect to any such tax.

(3)Exceptions
(A)Certain unpaid taxes

This subsection shall not apply with respect to any unpaid tax if—

(i)

the taxpayer files a written notice with the Secretary which waives the restriction imposed by this subsection on levy with respect to such tax; or

(ii)

the Secretary finds that the collection of such tax is in jeopardy.

(B)Certain levies

This subsection shall not apply to—

(i)

any levy to carry out an offset under section 6402; and

(ii)

any levy which was first made before the date that the applicable proceeding under this subsection commenced.

(4)Limitation on collection activity; authority to enjoin collection
(A)Limitation on collection

No proceeding in court for the collection of any unpaid tax to which paragraph (1) applies shall be begun by the Secretary during the pendency of a proceeding under such paragraph. This subparagraph shall not apply to—

(i)

any counterclaim in a proceeding under such paragraph; or

(ii)

any proceeding relating to a proceeding under such paragraph.

(B)Authority to enjoin

Notwithstanding section 7421(a), a levy or collection proceeding prohibited by this subsection may be enjoined (during the period such prohibition is in force) by the court in which the proceeding under paragraph (1) is brought.

(5)Suspension of statute of limitations on collection

The period of limitations under section 6502 shall be suspended for the period during which the Secretary is prohibited under this subsection from making a levy.

(6)Pendency of proceeding

For purposes of this subsection, a proceeding is pending beginning on the date such proceeding commences and ending on the date that a final order or judgment from which an appeal may be taken is entered in such proceeding.

(j)No levy before investigation of status of property
(1)In general

For purposes of applying the provisions of this subchapter, no levy may be made on any property or right to property which is to be sold under section 6335 until a thorough investigation of the status of such property has been completed.

(2)Elements in investigation

For purposes of paragraph (1), an investigation of the status of any property shall include—

(A)

a verification of the taxpayer’s liability;

(B)

the completion of an analysis under subsection (f);

(C)

the determination that the equity in such property is sufficient to yield net proceeds from the sale of such property to apply to such liability; and

(D)

a thorough consideration of alternative collection methods.

(k)No levy while certain offers pending or installment agreement pending or in effect
(1)Offer-in-compromise pending

No levy may be made under subsection (a) on the property or rights to property of any person with respect to any unpaid tax—

(A)

during the period that an offer-in-compromise by such person under section 7122 of such unpaid tax is pending with the Secretary; and

(B)

if such offer is rejected by the Secretary, during the 30 days thereafter (and, if an appeal of such rejection is filed within such 30 days, during the period that such appeal is pending).

For purposes of subparagraph (A), an offer is pending beginning on the date the Secretary accepts such offer for processing.

(2)Installment agreements

No levy may be made under subsection (a) on the property or rights to property of any person with respect to any unpaid tax—

(A)

during the period that an offer by such person for an installment agreement under section 6159 for payment of such unpaid tax is pending with the Secretary;

(B)

if such offer is rejected by the Secretary, during the 30 days thereafter (and, if an appeal of such rejection is filed within such 30 days, during the period that such appeal is pending);

(C)

during the period that such an installment agreement for payment of such unpaid tax is in effect; and

(D)

if such agreement is terminated by the Secretary, during the 30 days thereafter (and, if an appeal of such termination is filed within such 30 days, during the period that such appeal is pending).

(3)Certain rules to apply

Rules similar to the rules of—

(A)

paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (i), and

(B)

except in the case of paragraph (2)(C), paragraph (5) of subsection (i),

shall apply for purposes of this subsection.

(l)Cross references
(1)

For provisions relating to jeopardy, see subchapter A of chapter 70.

(2)

For proceedings applicable to sale of seized property see section 6335.

(3)

For release and notice of release of levy, see section 6343.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-1Levy and distraint Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) Authority to levy—(1) In general. If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the tax within 10 days after notice and demand, the district director to whom the assessment is charged (or, upon his request, any other district director) may proceed to collect the tax by levy. The district director may levy upon any property, or rights to property, whether real or personal, tangible or intangible, belonging to the taxpayer. The district director may also levy upon property with respect to which there is a lien provided by section 6321 or 6324 for the payment of the tax. For exemption of certain property from levy, see section 6334 and the regulations thereunder. As used in section 6331 and this section, the term “tax” includes any interest, additional amount, addition to tax, or assessable penalty, together with costs and expenses. Property subject to a Federal tax lien which has been sold or otherwise transferred by the taxpayer may be seized while in the hands of the transferee or any subsequent transferee. However, see provisions under sections 6323 and 6324 (a)(2) and (b) for protection of certain transferees against a Federal tax lien. Levy may be made by serving a notice of levy on any person in possession of, or obligated with respect to, property or rights to property subject to levy, including receivables, bank accounts, evidences of debt, securities, and salaries, wages, commissions, or other compensation. A levy on a bank reaches any interest that accrues on the taxpayer's balance under the terms of the bank's agreement with the depositor during the 21-day holding period provided for in section 6332(c). Except as provided in § 301.6331-1(b)(1) with regard to a levy on salary or wages, a levy extends only to property possessed and obligations which exist at the time of the levy. Obligations exist when the liability of the obligor is fixed and determinable although the right to receive payment thereof may be deferred until a later date. For example, if on the first day of the month a delinquent taxpayer sold personal property subject to an agreement that the buyer remit the purchase price on the last day of the month, a levy made on the buyer on the 10th day of the month would reach the amount due on the sale, although the buyer need not satisfy the levy by paying over the amount to the district director until the last day of the month. Similarly, a levy only reaches property in the possession of the person levied upon at the time the levy is made together with interest that accrues during the 21-day holding period provided for in section 6332(c). For example, a levy made on a bank with respect to the account of a delinquent taxpayer is satisfied if the bank surrenders the amount of the taxpayer's balance at the time the levy is made. The levy has no effect upon any subsequent deposit made in the bank by the taxpayer. Subsequent deposits may be reached only by a subsequent levy on the bank.

    (2) Jeopardy cases. If the district director finds that the collection of any tax is in jeopardy, he or she may make notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in section 6331(a), the 30-day period provided in section 6331(d), or the limitation on levy provided in section 6331(g)(1).

    (3) Bankruptcy or receivership cases. During a bankruptcy proceeding or a receivership proceeding in either a Federal or a State court, the assets of the taxpayer are in general under the control of the court in which such proceeding is pending. Taxes cannot be collected by levy upon assets in the custody of a court, whether or not such custody is incident to a bankruptcy or receivership proceeding, except where the proceeding has progressed to such a point that the levy would not interfere with the work of the court or where the court grants permission to levy. Any assets which under applicable provisions of law are not under the control of the court may be levied upon, for example, property exempt from court custody under State law or the bankrupt's earnings and property acquired after the date of bankruptcy. However, levy upon such property is not mandatory and the Government may rely upon payment of taxes in the proceeding.

    (4) Certain types of compensation—(i) Federal employees. Levy may be made upon the salary or wages of any officer or employee (including members of the Armed Forces), or elected or appointed official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of either, by serving a notice of levy on the employer of the delinquent taxpayer. As used in this subdivision, the term “employer” means (a) the officer or employee of the United States, the District of Columbia, or of the agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, who has control of the payment of the wages, or (b) any other officer or employee designated by the head of the branch, department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States or of the District of Columbia as the party upon whom service of the notice of levy may be made. If the head of such branch, department, agency or instrumentality designates an officer or employee other than one who has control of the payment of the wages, as the party upon whom service of the notice of levy may be made, such head shall promptly notify the Commissioner of the name and address of each officer or employee so designated and the scope or extent of his authority as such designee.

    (ii) State and municipal employees. Salaries, wages, or other compensation of any officer, employee, or elected or appointed official of a State or Territory, or of any agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision thereof, are also subject to levy to enforce collection of any Federal tax.

    (iii) Seamen. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 12 of the Seamen's Act of 1915 (46 U.S.C. 601), wages of seamen, apprentice seamen, or fishermen employed on fishing vessels are subject to levy. See section 6334(c).

    (5) Noncompetent Indians. Solely for purposes of sections 6321 and 6331, any interest in restricted land held in trust by the United States for an individual noncompetent Indian (and not for a tribe) shall not be deemed to be property, or a right to property, belonging to such Indian.

    (b) Continuing levies and successive seizures—(1) Continuing effect of levy on salary and wages. A levy on salary or wages has continuous effect from the time the levy originally is made until the levy is released pursuant to section 6343. For this purpose, the term salary or wages includes compensation for services paid in the form of fees, commissions, bonuses, and similar items. The levy attaches to both salary or wages earned but not yet paid at the time of the levy, advances on salary or wages made subsequent to the date of the levy, and salary or wages earned and becoming payable subsequent to the date of the levy, until the levy is released pursuant to section 6343. In general, salaries or wages that are the subject of a continuing levy and are not exempt from levy under section 6334(a)(8) or (9), are to be paid to the district director, the service center director, or the compliance center director (director) on the same date the payor would otherwise pay over the money to the taxpayer. For example, if an individual normally is paid on the Wednesday following the close of each work week, a levy made upon his or her employer on any Monday would apply to both wages due for the prior work week and wages for succeeding work weeks as such wages become payable. In such a case, the levy would be satisfied if, on the first Wednesday after the levy and on each Wednesday thereafter until the employer receives a notice of release from levy described in section 6343, the employer pays over to the director wages that would otherwise be paid to the employee on such Wednesday (less any exempt amount pursuant to section 6334).

    (2) Successive seizures. Whenever any property or rights to property upon which a levy has been made are not sufficient to satisfy the claim of the United States for which the levy is made, the district director may thereafter, and as often as may be necessary, proceed to levy in like manner upon any other property or rights to property subject to levy of the person against whom such claim exists or on which there is a lien imposed by section 6321 or 6324 (or the corresponding provision of prior law) for the payment of such claim until the amount due from such person, together with all costs and expenses, is fully paid.

    (c) Service of notice of levy by mail. A notice of levy may be served by mailing the notice to the person upon whom the service of a notice of levy is authorized under paragraph (a)(1) of this section. In such a case the date and time the notice is delivered to the person to be served is the date and time the levy is made. If the notice is sent by certificated mail, return receipt requested, the date of delivery on the receipt is treated as the date the levy is made. If, after receipt of a notice of levy, an officer or other person authorized to act on behalf of the person served signs and notes the date and time of receipt on the notice of levy, the date and time so the contrary, the date and time of delivery.

    Any person may, upon written notice to the district director having audit jurisdiction over such person, have all notices of levy by mail sent to one designated office. After such a notice is received by the district director, notices of levy by mail will be sent to the designated office until a written notice withdrawing the request or a written notice designating a different office is received by the district director.

    (d) Effective date. These regulations are effective December 10, 1992.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-1(a)Authority to levy—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Authority to levy—(1) In general. If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the tax within 10 days after notice and demand, the district director to whom the assessment is charged (or, upon his request, any other district director) may proceed to collect the tax by levy. The district director may levy upon any property, or rights to property, whether real or personal, tangible or intangible, belonging to the taxpayer. The district director may also levy upon property with respect to which there is a lien provided by section 6321 or 6324 for the payment of the tax. For exemption of certain property from levy, see section 6334 and the regulations thereunder. As used in section 6331 and this section, the term “tax” includes any interest, additional amount, addition to tax, or assessable penalty, together with costs and expenses. Property subject to a Federal tax lien which has been sold or otherwise transferred by the taxpayer may be seized while in the hands of the transferee or any subsequent transferee. However, see provisions under sections 6323 and 6324 (a)(2) and (b) for protection of certain transferees against a Federal tax lien. Levy may be made by serving a notice of levy on any person in possession of, or obligated with respect to, property or rights to property subject to levy, including receivables, bank accounts, evidences of debt, securities, and salaries, wages, commissions, or other compensation. A levy on a bank reaches any interest that accrues on the taxpayer's balance under the terms of the bank's agreement with the depositor during the 21-day holding period provided for in section 6332(c). Except as provided in § 301.6331-1(b)(1) with regard to a levy on salary or wages, a levy extends only to property possessed and obligations which exist at the time of the levy. Obligations exist when the liability of the obligor is fixed and determinable although the right to receive payment thereof may be deferred until a later date. For example, if on the first day of the month a delinquent taxpayer sold personal property subject to an agreement that the buyer remit the purchase price on the last day of the month, a levy made on the buyer on the 10th day of the month would reach the amount due on the sale, although the buyer need not satisfy the levy by paying over the amount to the district director until the last day of the month. Similarly, a levy only reaches property in the possession of the person levied upon at the time the levy is made together with interest that accrues during the 21-day holding period provided for in section 6332(c). For example, a levy made on a bank with respect to the account of a delinquent taxpayer is satisfied if the bank surrenders the amount of the taxpayer's balance at the time the levy is made. The levy has no effect upon any subsequent deposit made in the bank by the taxpayer. Subsequent deposits may be reached only by a subsequent levy on the bank.

    (2) Jeopardy cases. If the district director finds that the collection of any tax is in jeopardy, he or she may make notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in section 6331(a), the 30-day period provided in section 6331(d), or the limitation on levy provided in section 6331(g)(1).

    (3) Bankruptcy or receivership cases. During a bankruptcy proceeding or a receivership proceeding in either a Federal or a State court, the assets of the taxpayer are in general under the control of the court in which such proceeding is pending. Taxes cannot be collected by levy upon assets in the custody of a court, whether or not such custody is incident to a bankruptcy or receivership proceeding, except where the proceeding has progressed to such a point that the levy would not interfere with the work of the court or where the court grants permission to levy. Any assets which under applicable provisions of law are not under the control of the court may be levied upon, for example, property exempt from court custody under State law or the bankrupt's earnings and property acquired after the date of bankruptcy. However, levy upon such property is not mandatory and the Government may rely upon payment of taxes in the proceeding.

    (4) Certain types of compensation—(i) Federal employees. Levy may be made upon the salary or wages of any officer or employee (including members of the Armed Forces), or elected or appointed official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of either, by serving a notice of levy on the employer of the delinquent taxpayer. As used in this subdivision, the term “employer” means (a) the officer or employee of the United States, the District of Columbia, or of the agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, who has control of the payment of the wages, or (b) any other officer or employee designated by the head of the branch, department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States or of the District of Columbia as the party upon whom service of the notice of levy may be made. If the head of such branch, department, agency or instrumentality designates an officer or employee other than one who has control of the payment of the wages, as the party upon whom service of the notice of levy may be made, such head shall promptly notify the Commissioner of the name and address of each officer or employee so designated and the scope or extent of his authority as such designee.

    (ii) State and municipal employees. Salaries, wages, or other compensation of any officer, employee, or elected or appointed official of a State or Territory, or of any agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision thereof, are also subject to levy to enforce collection of any Federal tax.

    (iii) Seamen. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 12 of the Seamen's Act of 1915 (46 U.S.C. 601), wages of seamen, apprentice seamen, or fishermen employed on fishing vessels are subject to levy. See section 6334(c).

    (5) Noncompetent Indians. Solely for purposes of sections 6321 and 6331, any interest in restricted land held in trust by the United States for an individual noncompetent Indian (and not for a tribe) shall not be deemed to be property, or a right to property, belonging to such Indian.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-1(b)Continuing levies and successive seizures—(1) Continuing effect of levy on salary and wages. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Continuing levies and successive seizures—(1) Continuing effect of levy on salary and wages. A levy on salary or wages has continuous effect from the time the levy originally is made until the levy is released pursuant to section 6343. For this purpose, the term salary or wages includes compensation for services paid in the form of fees, commissions, bonuses, and similar items. The levy attaches to both salary or wages earned but not yet paid at the time of the levy, advances on salary or wages made subsequent to the date of the levy, and salary or wages earned and becoming payable subsequent to the date of the levy, until the levy is released pursuant to section 6343. In general, salaries or wages that are the subject of a continuing levy and are not exempt from levy under section 6334(a)(8) or (9), are to be paid to the district director, the service center director, or the compliance center director (director) on the same date the payor would otherwise pay over the money to the taxpayer. For example, if an individual normally is paid on the Wednesday following the close of each work week, a levy made upon his or her employer on any Monday would apply to both wages due for the prior work week and wages for succeeding work weeks as such wages become payable. In such a case, the levy would be satisfied if, on the first Wednesday after the levy and on each Wednesday thereafter until the employer receives a notice of release from levy described in section 6343, the employer pays over to the director wages that would otherwise be paid to the employee on such Wednesday (less any exempt amount pursuant to section 6334).

    (2) Successive seizures. Whenever any property or rights to property upon which a levy has been made are not sufficient to satisfy the claim of the United States for which the levy is made, the district director may thereafter, and as often as may be necessary, proceed to levy in like manner upon any other property or rights to property subject to levy of the person against whom such claim exists or on which there is a lien imposed by section 6321 or 6324 (or the corresponding provision of prior law) for the payment of such claim until the amount due from such person, together with all costs and expenses, is fully paid.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-1(c)Service of notice of levy by mail. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Service of notice of levy by mail. A notice of levy may be served by mailing the notice to the person upon whom the service of a notice of levy is authorized under paragraph (a)(1) of this section. In such a case the date and time the notice is delivered to the person to be served is the date and time the levy is made. If the notice is sent by certificated mail, return receipt requested, the date of delivery on the receipt is treated as the date the levy is made. If, after receipt of a notice of levy, an officer or other person authorized to act on behalf of the person served signs and notes the date and time of receipt on the notice of levy, the date and time so the contrary, the date and time of delivery.

    Any person may, upon written notice to the district director having audit jurisdiction over such person, have all notices of levy by mail sent to one designated office. After such a notice is received by the district director, notices of levy by mail will be sent to the designated office until a written notice withdrawing the request or a written notice designating a different office is received by the district director.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-1(d)Effective date. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Effective date. These regulations are effective December 10, 1992.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-2Procedures and restrictions on levies Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) Notice of intent to levy—(1) In general. Levy may be made upon the salary, wages, or other property of a taxpayer for any unpaid tax no less than 30 days after the district director, the service center director, or the compliance center director (director) has notified the taxpayer in writing of the intent to levy. The notice must be given in person, be left at the dwelling or usual place of business of the taxpayer, or be sent by registered or certified mail to the taxpayer's last known address. For further guidance regarding the definition of last known address, see § 301.6212-2. The notice of intent to levy is separate from, but may be given at the same time as, the notice and demand described in § 301.6331-1.

    (2) Content of Notice. The notice of intent to levy is to contain a brief statement in nontechnical terms including the following information—

    (i) The Internal Revenue Code provisions and the procedures relating to levy and sale of property;

    (ii) The administrative appeals available with respect to the levy and sale of property and the procedures relating to such appeals;

    (iii) The alternatives available that could prevent levy on the property (including the use of an installment agreement under section 6159); and

    (iv) The Internal Revenue Code provisions and the procedures relating to redemption of property and release of liens on property.

    (b) Uneconomical levy—(1) In general. No levy may be made on property if the director estimates that the anticipated expenses with respect to the levy and sale will exceed the fair market value of the property. The estimate is to be made on an aggregate basis for all of the items that are anticipated to be seized pursuant to the levy. Generally, no levy should be made on individual items of insignificant monetary value. For the definition of fair market value, see § 301.6325-1(b)(1)(i). See § 301.6341-1 concerning the expenses of levy and sale.

    (2) Time of estimate. The estimate, which may be formal or informal, is to be made at the time of the seizure or within a reasonable period of time prior to a seizure. The estimate may be based on earlier estimates of fair market value and anticipated expenses of the same or similar property.

    (3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of this paragraph (b):

    (c) Restriction on levy on date of appearance. Except for continuing levies on salaries or wages described in § 301.6331-1(b)(1), no levy may be made on any property of a person on the day that person, or an officer or employee of that person, is required to appear in response to a summons served for the purpose of collecting any underpayment of tax from that person. For purposes of this paragraph (c), the date on which an appearance is required is the date fixed by an officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to section 7605 or the date (if any) fixed as the result of a judicial proceeding instituted under sections 7604 and 7402(b) seeking the enforcement of the summons.

    (d) Jeopardy. Paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section do not apply to a levy if the director finds, for purposes of § 301.6331-1(a)(2), that the collection of tax is in jeopardy.

    (e) Effective date. These regulations are effective December 10, 1992.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-2(a)Notice of intent to levy—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Notice of intent to levy—(1) In general. Levy may be made upon the salary, wages, or other property of a taxpayer for any unpaid tax no less than 30 days after the district director, the service center director, or the compliance center director (director) has notified the taxpayer in writing of the intent to levy. The notice must be given in person, be left at the dwelling or usual place of business of the taxpayer, or be sent by registered or certified mail to the taxpayer's last known address. For further guidance regarding the definition of last known address, see § 301.6212-2. The notice of intent to levy is separate from, but may be given at the same time as, the notice and demand described in § 301.6331-1.

    (2) Content of Notice. The notice of intent to levy is to contain a brief statement in nontechnical terms including the following information—

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-2(b)Uneconomical levy—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Uneconomical levy—(1) In general. No levy may be made on property if the director estimates that the anticipated expenses with respect to the levy and sale will exceed the fair market value of the property. The estimate is to be made on an aggregate basis for all of the items that are anticipated to be seized pursuant to the levy. Generally, no levy should be made on individual items of insignificant monetary value. For the definition of fair market value, see § 301.6325-1(b)(1)(i). See § 301.6341-1 concerning the expenses of levy and sale.

    (2) Time of estimate. The estimate, which may be formal or informal, is to be made at the time of the seizure or within a reasonable period of time prior to a seizure. The estimate may be based on earlier estimates of fair market value and anticipated expenses of the same or similar property.

    (3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of this paragraph (b):

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-2(c)Restriction on levy on date of appearance. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Restriction on levy on date of appearance. Except for continuing levies on salaries or wages described in § 301.6331-1(b)(1), no levy may be made on any property of a person on the day that person, or an officer or employee of that person, is required to appear in response to a summons served for the purpose of collecting any underpayment of tax from that person. For purposes of this paragraph (c), the date on which an appearance is required is the date fixed by an officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to section 7605 or the date (if any) fixed as the result of a judicial proceeding instituted under sections 7604 and 7402(b) seeking the enforcement of the summons.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-2(d)Jeopardy. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Jeopardy. Paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section do not apply to a levy if the director finds, for purposes of § 301.6331-1(a)(2), that the collection of tax is in jeopardy.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-2(e)Effective date. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Effective date. These regulations are effective December 10, 1992.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-2(i)§301.6331-2(i) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    The Internal Revenue Code provisions and the procedures relating to levy and sale of property;

    (ii) The administrative appeals available with respect to the levy and sale of property and the procedures relating to such appeals;

    (iii) The alternatives available that could prevent levy on the property (including the use of an installment agreement under section 6159); and

    (iv) The Internal Revenue Code provisions and the procedures relating to redemption of property and release of liens on property.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-3Restrictions on levy while offers to compromise are pending Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Cross-reference. For provisions relating to the making of levies while an offer to compromise is pending, see § 301.7122-1.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-4Restrictions on levy while installment agreements are pending or in effect Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) Prohibition on levy—(1) In general. No levy may be made to collect a tax liability that is the subject of an installment agreement during the period that a proposed installment agreement is pending with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), for 30 days immediately following the rejection of a proposed installment agreement, during the period that an installment agreement is in effect, and for 30 days immediately following the termination of an installment agreement. If, within the 30 days following the rejection or termination of an installment agreement, the taxpayer files an appeal with the IRS Office of Appeals, no levy may be made while the rejection or termination is being considered by Appeals. This section will not prohibit levy to collect the liability of any person other than the person or persons named in the installment agreement.

    (2) When a proposed installment agreement becomes pending. A proposed installment agreement becomes pending when it is accepted for processing. The IRS may not accept a proposed installment agreement for processing following reference of a case involving the liability that is the subject of the proposed installment agreement to the Department of Justice for prosecution or defense. The proposed installment agreement remains pending until the IRS accepts the proposal, the IRS notifies the taxpayer that the proposal has been rejected, or the proposal is withdrawn by the taxpayer. If a proposed installment agreement that has been accepted for processing does not contain sufficient information to permit the IRS to evaluate whether the proposal should be accepted, the IRS will request the taxpayer to provide the needed additional information. If the taxpayer does not submit the additional information that the IRS has requested within a reasonable time period after such a request, the IRS may reject the proposed installment agreement.

    (3) Revised proposals of installment agreements submitted following rejection. If, following the rejection of a proposed installment agreement, the taxpayer makes a good faith revision of the proposal and submits the revision within 30 days of the date of rejection, the provisions of this section shall apply to that revised proposal.

    (4) Exceptions. Paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall not prohibit levy if the taxpayer files a written notice with the IRS that waives the restriction on levy imposed by this section, the IRS determines that the proposed installment agreement was submitted solely to delay collection, or the IRS determines that collection of the tax to which the installment agreement or proposed installment agreement relates is in jeopardy.

    (b) Other actions by the IRS while levy is prohibited—(1) In general. The IRS may take actions other than levy to protect the interests of the Government with regard to the liability identified in an installment agreement or proposed installment agreement. Those actions include, for example—

    (i) Crediting an overpayment against the liability pursuant to section 6402;

    (ii) Filing or refiling notices of Federal tax lien; and

    (iii) Taking action to collect from any person who is not named in the installment agreement or proposed installment agreement but who is liable for the tax to which the installment agreement relates.

    (2) Proceedings in court. Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (b)(2), the IRS will not refer a case to the Department of Justice for the commencement of a proceeding in court, against a person named in an installment agreement or proposed installment agreement, if levy to collect the liability is prohibited by paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Without regard to whether a person is named in an installment agreement or proposed installment agreement, however, the IRS may authorize the Department of Justice to file a counterclaim or third-party complaint in a refund action or to join that person in any other proceeding in which liability for the tax that is the subject of the installment agreement or proposed installment agreement may be established or disputed, including a suit against the United States under 28 U.S.C. 2410. In addition, the United States may file a claim in any bankruptcy proceeding or insolvency action brought by or against such person. If a person named in an installment agreement is joined in a proceeding, the United States obtains a judgment against that person, and the case is referred back to the IRS for collection, collection will continue to occur pursuant to the terms of the installment agreement.

    (c) Statute of limitations—(1) Suspension of the statute of limitations on collection. The statute of limitations under section 6502 for collection of any liability shall be suspended during the period that a proposed installment agreement relating to that liability is pending with the IRS, for 30 days immediately following the rejection of a proposed installment agreement, and for 30 days immediately following the termination of an installment agreement. If, within the 30 days following the rejection or termination of an installment agreement, the taxpayer files an appeal with the IRS Office of Appeals, the statute of limitations for collection shall be suspended while the rejection or termination is being considered by Appeals. The statute of limitations for collection shall continue to run if an exception under paragraph (a)(4) of this section applies and levy is not prohibited with respect to the taxpayer.

    (2) Waivers of the statute of limitations on collection. The IRS may continue to request, to the extent permissible under section 6502 and § 301.6159-1, that the taxpayer agree to a reasonable extension of the statute of limitations for collection.

    (d) Cross-reference. For provisions relating to the making of levies while an installment agreement is pending or in effect, see § 301.6159-1.

    (e) Effective/applicability date. Paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) are applicable beginning December 18, 2002. Paragraph (d) is applicable beginning November 25, 2009.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-4(a)Prohibition on levy—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Prohibition on levy—(1) In general. No levy may be made to collect a tax liability that is the subject of an installment agreement during the period that a proposed installment agreement is pending with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), for 30 days immediately following the rejection of a proposed installment agreement, during the period that an installment agreement is in effect, and for 30 days immediately following the termination of an installment agreement. If, within the 30 days following the rejection or termination of an installment agreement, the taxpayer files an appeal with the IRS Office of Appeals, no levy may be made while the rejection or termination is being considered by Appeals. This section will not prohibit levy to collect the liability of any person other than the person or persons named in the installment agreement.

    (2) When a proposed installment agreement becomes pending. A proposed installment agreement becomes pending when it is accepted for processing. The IRS may not accept a proposed installment agreement for processing following reference of a case involving the liability that is the subject of the proposed installment agreement to the Department of Justice for prosecution or defense. The proposed installment agreement remains pending until the IRS accepts the proposal, the IRS notifies the taxpayer that the proposal has been rejected, or the proposal is withdrawn by the taxpayer. If a proposed installment agreement that has been accepted for processing does not contain sufficient information to permit the IRS to evaluate whether the proposal should be accepted, the IRS will request the taxpayer to provide the needed additional information. If the taxpayer does not submit the additional information that the IRS has requested within a reasonable time period after such a request, the IRS may reject the proposed installment agreement.

    (3) Revised proposals of installment agreements submitted following rejection. If, following the rejection of a proposed installment agreement, the taxpayer makes a good faith revision of the proposal and submits the revision within 30 days of the date of rejection, the provisions of this section shall apply to that revised proposal.

    (4) Exceptions. Paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall not prohibit levy if the taxpayer files a written notice with the IRS that waives the restriction on levy imposed by this section, the IRS determines that the proposed installment agreement was submitted solely to delay collection, or the IRS determines that collection of the tax to which the installment agreement or proposed installment agreement relates is in jeopardy.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-4(b)Other actions by the IRS while levy is prohibited—(1) In general. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Other actions by the IRS while levy is prohibited—(1) In general. The IRS may take actions other than levy to protect the interests of the Government with regard to the liability identified in an installment agreement or proposed installment agreement. Those actions include, for example—

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-4(c)Statute of limitations—(1) Suspension of the statute of limitations on collection. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Statute of limitations—(1) Suspension of the statute of limitations on collection. The statute of limitations under section 6502 for collection of any liability shall be suspended during the period that a proposed installment agreement relating to that liability is pending with the IRS, for 30 days immediately following the rejection of a proposed installment agreement, and for 30 days immediately following the termination of an installment agreement. If, within the 30 days following the rejection or termination of an installment agreement, the taxpayer files an appeal with the IRS Office of Appeals, the statute of limitations for collection shall be suspended while the rejection or termination is being considered by Appeals. The statute of limitations for collection shall continue to run if an exception under paragraph (a)(4) of this section applies and levy is not prohibited with respect to the taxpayer.

    (2) Waivers of the statute of limitations on collection. The IRS may continue to request, to the extent permissible under section 6502 and § 301.6159-1, that the taxpayer agree to a reasonable extension of the statute of limitations for collection.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-4(d)Cross-reference. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Cross-reference. For provisions relating to the making of levies while an installment agreement is pending or in effect, see § 301.6159-1.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-4(e)Effective/applicability date. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Effective/applicability date. Paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) are applicable beginning December 18, 2002. Paragraph (d) is applicable beginning November 25, 2009.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6331-4(i)§301.6331-4(i) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Crediting an overpayment against the liability pursuant to section 6402;

    (ii) Filing or refiling notices of Federal tax lien; and

    (iii) Taking action to collect from any person who is not named in the installment agreement or proposed installment agreement but who is liable for the tax to which the installment agreement relates.

    (2) Proceedings in court. Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (b)(2), the IRS will not refer a case to the Department of Justice for the commencement of a proceeding in court, against a person named in an installment agreement or proposed installment agreement, if levy to collect the liability is prohibited by paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Without regard to whether a person is named in an installment agreement or proposed installment agreement, however, the IRS may authorize the Department of Justice to file a counterclaim or third-party complaint in a refund action or to join that person in any other proceeding in which liability for the tax that is the subject of the installment agreement or proposed installment agreement may be established or disputed, including a suit against the United States under 28 U.S.C. 2410. In addition, the United States may file a claim in any bankruptcy proceeding or insolvency action brought by or against such person. If a person named in an installment agreement is joined in a proceeding, the United States obtains a judgment against that person, and the case is referred back to the IRS for collection, collection will continue to occur pursuant to the terms of the installment agreement.

183 Citing Cases

Shaban v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2026-24 · 2026 · T.C.

eater than $50,000; and (3) with respect to which a notice of lien has been filed pursuant to section 6323 and the administrative rights under section 6320 with respect to such filing have been exhausted or have lapsed, or a levy is made pursuant to section 6331. § 7345(b)(1). The $50,000 amount described in section 7345(b)(1)(B) is adjusted to account for inflation. § 7345(f). The amount for the year 2025 when the Commissioner certified Mr. Shaban’s tax debt as seriously delinquent was $64,000.

The Diversified Group Incorporated, Petitioner 166 T.C. No. 2 · 2026 · T.C.

§§ 6331, 7701(a)(11)(B), (12)(A)(i); see also Ramey v. Commissioner, 156 T.C. 1, 2–3 (2021). Because the power to levy is a strong remedy for collecting unpaid tax, section 6330 gives taxpayers the right to a hearing with IRS Appeals, i.e., a CDP hearing. I.R.C. § 6330(b)(1); Ramey, 156 T.C. at 2. At the CDP hearing, IRS Appeals must verify

Garcia v. Commissioner 164 T.C. No. 8 · 2025

vidual— (A) which has been assessed, (B) which is greater than $50,000, and (C) with respect to which— (i) a notice of lien has been filed pursuant to section 6323 and the administrative rights under section 6320 with respect to such filing have been exhausted or have lapsed, or (ii) a levy is made pursuant to section 6331.

Pfirrman v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2025-22 · 2025

As relevant here, section 6331 requires that the Secretary provide the taxpayer a “brief statement” describing, inter alia, levy procedures, administrative appeal rights, and collection alternatives at least 30 days before the issuance of the levy.

J.E. Ryckman, Petitioner 163 T.C. No. 3 · 2024

er demand.” Meanwhile, although section 6330(a)(1) does not specifically cross-reference section 6331 (which generally authorizes the IRS to collect an unpaid “tax” by levy), section 6330(a)(3)(A) provides that the levy notice sent to the taxpayer must include “the amount of unpaid tax.” Therefore, we hold that the rights afforded by the CDP statutes apply only to those people subject to IRS actions to collect “tax.” Ms.

Because an FBAR penalty is not a tax, neither section 6321 nor section 6331 applies to petitioners, and therefore, no lien or levy to collect these penalties is authorized.

Mathew v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2024-69 · 2024

Section 6331(d) provides that the levy authorized by section 6331(a) may be made with respect to any unpaid tax only after the Commissioner has notified the person in writing of his intention to make the levy at least 30 days before any levy action is begun.

Adams v. Commissioner 160 T.C. No. 1 · 2023

8 (i) a notice of lien has been filed pursuant to section 6323 and the administrative rights under section 6320 with respect to such filing have been exhausted or have lapsed, or (ii) a levy is made pursuant to section 6331.

Meduty v. Commissioner 160 T.C. No. 13 · 2023

As relevant here, section 6331 requires that the Secretary provide the taxpayer a “brief statement” describing, inter alia, levy procedures, administrative appeal rights, and collection alternatives at least 30 days before the issuance of the levy.

Pugh v. Commissioner 161 T.C. No. 2 · 2023

vidual— (A) which has been assessed, (B) which is greater than $50,000, and (C) with respect to which— (i) a notice of lien has been filed pursuant to section 6323 and the administrative rights under section 6320 with respect to such filing have been exhausted or have lapsed, or (ii) a levy is made pursuant to section 6331.

Specifically, we must address whether the requirement of section 7345(b)(1)(C)(ii) that a levy “is made pursuant to section 6331” means that, to prevail on summary judgment, the Commissioner must demonstrate how the record before us shows that he acted in conformity with section 6331 in making the relevant levy.

§§ 6331, 7701(a)(11)(B), (12)(A)(i); see also Ramey v. Commissioner, 156 T.C. 1, 2–3 (2021). Because the power to levy is a strong remedy for collecting unpaid tax, the Code, in section 6330, gives taxpayers the right to a hearing with IRS Appeals (a CDP hearing). I.R.C. § 6330(b)(1); Ramey, 156 T.C. at 2. At the CDP hearing, IRS Appeals must verify

Mattson v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2022-118 · 2022

2022-54, at *5 (clarifying that either a notice of lien filed pursuant to section 6323 or a levy made pursuant to section 6331 “is sufficient to render a tax debt ‘seriously delinquent’”).

Ezekwo v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2022-54 · 2022

The record establishes, with respect to each year subject to certi- fication, that “a notice of lien has been filed pursuant to section 6323” and that “a levy [has been] made pursuant to section 6331.” See § 7345(b)(1)(C).

Rowen v. Commissioner 156 T.C. No. 8 · 2021

- 12 - greater than” $51,000,6 for which “a notice of lien has been filed pursuant to section 6323 and the administrative rights under section 6320 * * * have been exhausted or have lapsed, or * * * levy is made pursuant to section 6331.” Section 7345(b)(2) excludes from the definition of “seriously delinquent tax debt” any debt that is “being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement * * * under section 6159 or 7122” and any debt for which “collection is suspended * * * because a due pro

Kaebel v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2021-109 · 2021

Levy Notice Section 6331 provides that unpaid taxes may be collected by levy.

An assessment oftax is the first step in that process. See sec. 6201. The two most common assessments are summary assessments and deficiency assessments. Each is a distinct creature ofthe Code, subject to its own rules and regulations. The Commissioner is authorized to summarily assess the amount oftax shown not only on a taxpayer's orig

the end ofone process--tax determination--andthe beginning ofanother--administrative tax collection. A proper assessment enables the tax lien created by § 6321 to arise. It allows the IRS to begin seizing taxpayerproperty under its levy authority in § 6331. Finally, and most critically, a proper assessment opens up the § 6502 collection period, which gives the IRS a whopping ten years to collect the tax administratively. The corollary is that ifno proper assessment is made within the applicable

Section 6331 is "broad and reveals on its face that Congress meant to reach every interest in propertythat a taxpayer might have." Drye v. United States, 528 U.S. 49, 56 (1999) (quoting United States v. Nat'l Bank ofCommerce, 472 U.S. 713, 719-720 - 19 - [*19] (1985)). The levy reaches property held by a third party ifthat third party is holding t

Section 6331 grants the Secretary the authorityto collect on the assessment by levy and distraint. Congress, by its amendments to the Code in FETIA, expanded the Secretary's authorityto collect actively on criminal restitution orders following summary assessment. See Muncy v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2017-83, at *18, M, 890 F.3d 724 (8th Cir. 2018)

Section 6330 elaborates on section 6331 and provides that the written notice must inform the taxpayer of her right to request a CDP hearing.

- 3 - [*3] section 6331 that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) had issued to JPMorgan Chase Bank with respect to petitioners' retirement plan.

IRC § 6331 states that ifany person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretaryto collect such tax (and such further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses ofthe levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt u

- 3 - [*3] section 6331 that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) had issued to JPMorgan Chase Bank with respect to petitioners' retirement plan.

The moneys he received from Pacific were not: (1) attributable to a disability; (2) a part ofa series ofsubstantially equal payments; (3) dividends with respect to a corporation described in section 404(k); (4) due to a levy under section 6331; received for medical care use; (5) pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order; (6) received while petitioner was unemployed and intended for payment ofhealth insurance premiums; (7) received for paying higher education expenses; (8) received for the

6331(a), we hold that it is covered by the levy procedures under section 6331.

from his checking account on September 9, 2011, because ofan "IRS Notice ofLevy." It may be that petitioner deposited a portion ofthe State Street distributions into his Wells Fargo account.5 But a subsequent IRS levy on that account obviously does not establish that there was "a levy under section 6331 on the qualified retirement plan" or that the distributions from State Street to petitioner were "made on account ofa levy" within the meaning ofsection 72(t)(2)(A)(vii). Because the levy excepti

When section 6330 was enacted in 1998, it provided taxpayers with new procedural protections in the case ofa levy which was already authorized by section 6331.3 The levy authority provided in section 6331 is restrictedto property of"the person" liable to pay the tax.

The Commissioner must inform a taxpayer ofthe taxpayer's right to a collection hearing before he can levy upon the taxpayer's property or rights to property. Sec. 6330(a). The collection hearing is held with an officer within the Commissioner's Office ofAppeals (Appeals officer). Sec 6330(b). An Appeals officer must heed certain consider

A notice ofintent to levy is an action other than a levyto protectthe interests ofthe Government; unlike a levy, it is merely preliminaryto a collection actio'n, rather than a collection action barred by section 6331(k)(2).

ic facts showing that there is a genuine dispute for trial. * * * When a taxpayer fails to pay any federal tax liability within 10 days of notice and demand for payment, the IRS may collect the unpaid tax by levy on the taxpayer's propertypursuantto section 6331. Before the IRS may proceed with a levy, the taxpayer is entitled to administrative reviewpursuantto section 6330. Administrative reviewtakes the form ofa hearing before the IRS Appeals Office. -12- [*12] Sec. 6330(b). The pertinentproce

Section 6330 Hearing Under section 6331, ifa person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax by levy upon all property and rights to property belonging to such person.

Karagozian v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2013-164 · 2013

cretary must notify the taxpayer ofthe Secretary's intention to make the levy, including notice ofthe administrative appeals available to the taxpayer (including a CDP hearing). Sec. 6331(d). Respondent complied with the administrative procedures in section 6331. I. Scope ofreview Under certain circumstances a taxpayer may raise challenges in a CDP proceeding to the Commissioner's determination ofhis or her underlying tax liabilities. See sec. 6330(c)(2)(B). A taxpayermay challenge in a CDP proc

Dixon v. Commissioner 141 T.C. No. 3 · 2013

Section 6331 governs levy and seizure ofpropertyto satisfy Federal tax obligations.

Discussion When a taxpayer fails to pay any federal tax liability within 10 days ofnotice and demand for payment, the IRS may collect the unpaid tax by levy on the taxpayer's property pursuant to section 6331.

We disagree with the IRS's contention-and conclude that the relevant inquiry is whether under State law Ms.

Weber v. Commissioner 138 T.C. No. 18 · 2012

Section 6330 provides that, before the IRS may make a levy on any property pursuant to section 6331, the taxpayer is entitled to notice of the Commissioner's intent to levy and ofthe taxpayer's right to a hearing before the IRS Office ofAppeals.

Lewis v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2012-138 · 2012

OPINION Under section 6331, ifa person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax by levy upon all property and rights to property belonging to such person.

Crites v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2012-267 · 2012

She also threw in arguments that she isn't a "person" subject to levy under section 6331, that her employer-provided Forms W-2 weren't valid, that without Forms W-2 the Commissioner had insufficient information to 1 Crites had attached ordinary W-2s to her normal original 2005 return.

Worthan v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2012-263 · 2012

in connection with the collection due process hearing"), rev'd on other grounds, 682 F.3d 149 (1st Cir. 2012); Acme Music Co. v. IRS (In re Acme Music Co., Inc.), 208 B.R. 838, 844 r (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 1997) (holding that "[a]ctions oflevy * * * under I.R.C. section 6331 constitute collection actions" for purposes ofsection 7430). To illustrate the difference between an administrative proceeding and a collection action, section 301.7430-3(d), Example (6), Proced. & Admin. Regs., provides as follow

Minihan v. Commissioner 138 T.C. 1 · 2012

That being the case, the IRS argues, in effect, that if the levy was proper under section 6331 and was not barred by section 6015(e)(l)(B)(i) because the property seized was co-owned by a taxpayer from whom the IRS was allowed to collect (here, Mr.

Michael K. & Rachel H. Byrd, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2011-146 · 2011

e of intent to levy. However, the record indicates that respondent issued two - 9 - notices of balance due and sent them to petitioners' correct mailing address at least 10 days before the issuance of the notice of intent to levy, as required under section 6331. Petitioners also claim that the "IRS has not followed their required procedures concerning income tax collection involving [the] Notice of Deficiency" before filing the notice of lien/levy, even though the assessment is based solely on t

Busche v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2011-285 · 2011

Collection review procedure When a taxpayer fails tö pay any Federal tax liability within 10 days of notice and demand, the IRS may collect the unpaid tax by levy on the taxpayer's property, pursuant to section 6331.

Johnson v. Commissioner 136 T.C. No. 23 · 2011

Right to agency-level hearing Section 6330 provides that, before a levy may be made on any property or right to property pursuant to section 6331, a taxpayer is entitled to notice of the Commissioner's intent to levy and of the taxpayer's right to a fair hearing before an impartial-officer of the IRS Office of Appeals.

Similarly, undèr section 6331, if a person liable to pay any tax neglects or refùses to þay the' same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the secretary to collect s'uch tax by' levy up n all property' and rights to property belonging to such person, taxpayer ma(cid:0)570appeal the proposed ' levy to the IRS under secti n 633Ê by requestin

Schwendeman v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2011-70 · 2011

- As best we under tand itÙ, petitionef's claim for relief is not directed toward the NFTL to which t he notice of determination refates but rather~ toward some possible future collection action that responcient might dpcide t t ake, ü h as making a levy upon his property pursuant to section 6331 or instituting a court action to enforce the li'en pürsuant to ection 7403.

Standard of Review Under section 6331, if a person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax by levy upon all property and rights to property belonging to such person.

Anson v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2010-119 · 2010

Collection review procedure When a taxpayer fails to pay any Federal tax liability within 10 days of notice and demand, the IRS may collect the unpaid tax by levy on the taxpayer's property, pursuant to section 6331 .

Respondent invites us to overrule our opinion in Robinette and limit our review to the administrative record .

In order to invoke judicial review of a section 6330 determination, a taxpayer must be the person liable for the tax under section 6331 and must- have received from the IRS a valid notice of determination based on a section 6330 hearing.

Owusu v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2010-186 · 2010

year in which the participant reached age 55, sec . 72(t)(2)(A)(v) ; (4) certain distributions by employee stock ownership plans of dividends on employer's securities, sec . 72(t) (2) (A) (vi) ; (5) payments made on account of a levy under - 11 - section 6331, sec . 72(t)(2)(A)(vii) ; (6) distributions not exceeding deductible medical expenses, sec . 72(t)(2)(B) ; (7) distributions to a nonparticipant under a qualified domestic relations order, sec . 72(t)(2)(C) ; and (8) certain distributions

Toth v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2010-227 · 2010

Standard of Review Under.section 6331, if a person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), before it may collect that liability by a levy upon property or rights to property of that taxpayer, must notify the taxpayer in writing of its intention to make the levy.

Vinatieri v. Commissioner 133 T.C. No. 16 · 2009

If' a taxpayer liable.-for Federal taxes fails to pay the taxes within 10 days after notice and demand, section 6331 authorizes the Secretary to collect the,tax by levy upon all property and rights to property (except any property that is - 11 - exempt under section 6334 ) belonging to the taxpayer or on which there is a lien for the payment of the tax .

Edward & Mary E. Sullivan, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2009-4 · 2009

ts . In United States v . Craft , 535 U .S . 274 (2002), the Supreme Court held that a federal tax lien under section 6321 can attach to entirety property. To date, the Supreme Court has yet to extend Craft 's holding to levies or forced sales under section 6331 . However, Craft 's holding has been extended to levies and forced sales by the IRS, in its IRS Notice 2003-60, 2003-2 C .B . 643, and by the Sixth Circuit, in Hatchett v. United States , 330 F .3d 875, 882 (6th Cir . 2003) . Furthermore

Casey v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2009-131 · 2009

Section 6331(d) provides that the levy authorized-by section 6331(a)-may be made with respect .toany unpaid tax only ;if the Secretary has given written notice!

Taylor v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2009-27 · 2009

Section 6331 ( a) provides that if any taxpayer liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay such tax within 10 days after notice and demand for payment , then the Secretary is authorized to collect such tax by levy upon the taxpayer' s property .

James A. & Linda A. Willhite, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2009-263 · 2009

which petitioners rely excepts from that tax distributions "made on account of a levy under section 6331 on the qualified retirement plan .

Michael v. Commissioner 133 T.C. No. 10 · 2009

Accordingly, we hold that the assessments are va id and provide a basis for the levy action .

Granger v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2009-258 · 2009

, Collection Due Process Hearing s Under section 6331 ;;(a),, if a person liable for a tax fails to pit withina 10 days afteyr notice and demand, it ios lawful, f r .the Secretary to "colle t such tax * * * by levy upon all I property and rights,,to ,property * * " * belonging to such' person" .

Shanley v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2009-17 · 2009

Collection Review Procedure When a taxpayer fails to pay any Federal income tax liability within 10 days of notice and demand, the IRS may collect the unpaid tax by levy on the taxpayer's property, pursuant to section 6331 .

Dinino v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2009-284 · 2009

Collection Due Process When a taxpayer fails to pay any Federal tax liability within 10 days of-notice and demand, the IRS may collect the unpaid tax by levy on,the taxpayer's property, pursuant to section 6331 .

Section 6330 elaborates on section 6331 and provides that upon a timely request a taxpayer is entitled to a collection hearing before respondent's Office of Appeals .

William R. & Patricia M. Kohler, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2008-127 · 2008

Section 6330 elaborates on section 6331 and provides that upon a timely request a taxpayer is entitled to a collection hearing before the IRS Office of Appeals .

expectancy) of the employee or the joint lives (or joint life expectancies) of such employee and his designated beneficiary , (v) made to an employee after separation from service after attainment of age 55 , (vi) dividends paid with respect to stock of a corporation which are described in section 404(k), o r (vii) made on account of a levy under section 6331 on the qualified retirement plan .

Section 6331 (d) provides that the levy may be made only if the Secretary has given written notice to the taxpayer 30 days before the levy .

Williams v. Commissioner 131 T.C. No. 6 · 2008

- 9 - received any other notice that might confer jurisdiction on this Court, such as a notice pertaining to a lien under section 6321 or to a levy under section 6331 (both of which are procedures applicable to "any person liable to pay any tax" (emphasis added)) .' Such collection activities give rise to a notice and opportunity for a hearing under section 6320 or section 6330 (both of which explicitly presume "unpaid tax") .

108, 112-113 (1959), for the following : "all taxpayers are subject to levy for deficiencies under section 6331 ; section 6331 specifically names government employees and agents in response to - 8 - earlier Supreme Court case [Smith v .

Williams v. Commissioner 131 T.C. 54 · 2008

Petitioner does not allege here that he received any notice of deficiency for the fbar penalties, nor does he allege having received any other notice that might confer jurisdiction on this Court, such as a notice pertaining to a lien under section 6321 or to a levy under section 6331 (both of which are procedures applicable to “any person liable to pay any tax” (emphasis added)).

in gross income ." Section 72 ( t)(2) further provides : Paragraph [72(t)(1) shall not apply to any of the following distributions : (A) * * * Distributions which are-- (iv) part of a series of substantially equa l periodic payments * * * or * * * * * * (vii) made on account of a levy under section 6331 on the qualified retirement plan . Section 72(t)(4) provides : (A) In general . If-- (i) paragraph (1) does not apply to a distribution by reason of paragraph (2)(A)(iv) , and (ii) the series of

Section 6331(d) provides that the levy authorized in section 6331(a) may be made with respect to any "unpaid tax" only after the Secretary has notified the person in writing of his intention to make the levy and of the taxpayer's right to a section 6330 hearing at least 30 days before any levy action is begun.

Section 6331 (d) provides that the levy may be made only if the Secretary has given written notice to the taxpayer 30 days before the levy .

Sebastian v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2007-138 · 2007

Section 6330 elaborates on section 6331 and provides that upon a timely request a taxpayer is entitled to a collection hearing before the IRS Office of Appeals .

IRC Section 6331 authorizes the IRS to levy if he taxpayer neglects or refuses to pay with 10 days after notice and demand . IRC Section 6331(d) requires that IRS must notify a taxpayer at least 30 days before a notice of levy may be issued . The file shows the Service issued this notice for the period considered at this hearing . A review of the file

Creamer v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2007-266 · 2007

108, 111-112 (1959), the Supreme Court rejected a similar argument and held that section 6331 authorizes the Commissioner to levy on property and rights to property of all taxpayers .

Section 6330 elaborates on section 6331 and provides that upon a BThe Court granted Mr .

Section 6330 elaborates on section 6331 and provides that upon a timely request a taxpayer is entitled to a collection hearing before the IRS Office of Appeals .

Craig I. & Mary Lou Smith, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2007-221 · 2007

Section 6330 elaborates on section 6331 and provides that upon a timely request a taxpayer is entitled to a collection hearing before the IRS Office of Appeals .

Leggett v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2006-277 · 2006

Section 6331 governs levy actions and thus is applicable. The record reflects that respondent complied with section 6331 as respondent provided petitioner with the requisite notice, a Final Notice - Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing,.on March 1, 2004, which petitioner apparently received, as he requested a collection he

Schwersensky v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2006-178 · 2006

The levy at issue (made pursuant to section 6331) is an administrative action that does not necessitate the institution of a civil suit.

Freije v. Commissioner 125 T.C. No. 3 · 2005

Both section 6331, which empowers the Commissioner to impose a levy, and section 6330, which requires the Commissioner to afford a hearing before proceeding with a levy and provides our jurisdiction to review his determination to proceed with a levy, contemplate an "unpaid tax". Secs. 6330(a)(1), (3)(A), (b)(2) and (3), (c)(2)(A), 6331(d)(1) (emphasis a

Kenneth B. & Marie L. Boyd, Petitioner 124 T.C. No. 18 · 2005

Levy.Versus Offset A levy is distinguishable from an offset. See, e.g., Belloff v. Commissioner, 996 F.2d 607, 615-616 (2d Cir. 1993) (comparing discussion of "levy" in United States v. Natl. Bank of Commerce, 472 U.S. 713, 720 (1985), with "setoff" in United States v. Munsey Trust Co., 332 U.S. 234, 239 (1947)), affg. T.C. (cid:16)04M2emo. 1991-350. The Commissioner's levy authority derives from the Code, sec. 6331, and it allows the Commissioner to proceed administratively to assert the Govern

Lane v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2005-182 · 2005

Levy action may be taken consistent with the prior notice requirements of IRC Section 6331 to the extent that this liability remains unpaid.

Williams v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2005-94 · 2005

This section has no bearing on the instant proceeding in that the levying upon property under section 6331 is an administrative action that does not necessitate the institution of a civil suit.

Newstat v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2005-262 · 2005

Section 6330(a) expands in several respects upon the premise of section 6331(.d), forbidding collection by levy until the taxpayer has been furnished notice of the opportunity for administrative review of the matter in the form of a hearing before the IRS Office of Appeals.

Myong Soo Kim & Sung Me Hwang, Petitioners T.C. Memo. 2005-96 · 2005

The NILs informed petitioners of respondent’s intent to levy upon their property pursuant to section 6331 and of their right to a hearing with the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) Office of Appeals (Appeals) under section 6330.

Millard v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2005-192 · 2005

ife expectancy) of the employee or the joint lives (or joint life expectancies) of such employee and his designated beneficiary, (v) made to an employee after separation from service after attainment of age 55, (vi) dividends paid with respect to stock of a corporation which are described in section 404(k), or (vii) made on account of a levy under section 6331 on the qualified retirement plan.

Crevenne C. & Barbara A. Carrillo, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2005-290 · 2005

This section has no bearing on the instant proceeding in that the filing of a notice of Federal tax lien under section 6323 and the levying upon property under section 6331 are administrative actions that do not necessitate the institution of a civil suit.

Poe v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2005-107 · 2005

- 6 - IRC §6331 provides that if any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property (ex- cept such property as is ex

Joseph F. & Caroline Enos, Petitioner 123 T.C. No. 17 · 2004

713 (1985), a nonbankruptcy case, the Supreme Court observed that an “administrative levy, unlike a judicial lien-foreclosure action, does not determine the ownership rights to the property.” Id. at 731 (citing United States v. Rodgers, 461 U.S. 677, 696 (1983)). Moreover, in Natl. Bank of Commerce, the Supreme Court held that “The Court, in other words, recognized what we now make explicit: that § 6331[7] is a provisional remedy, which does not determine 7Sec.

Gerald L. & Jessica P. Frey, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2004-87 · 2004

* * * * * * * It is clear that before any appeals officer can recommend the seizure of any property pursuant to Code Section 6331 certain elements have to be present.

Yazzie v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2004-233 · 2004

This section has no bearing on the instant proceeding in that the filing of a notice of Federal tax lien under section 6323 and the levying upon property under section 6331 are administrative actions that do not necessitate the institution of a civil suit.

The final notice informed the taxpayers of respondent’s intention to levy under section 6331 and of the taxpayers’ right to Appeals Office consideration.

Gilligan v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2004-194 · 2004

Section 6330 Section 6330 provides that the Secretary shall furnish the person described in section 6331 with written notice (i.e., the hearing notice) before a levy on any property or right to property.

Medlin v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2003-224 · 2003

§ 6331, placed three of his automobiles in a storage facility, located on Michigan Avenue in Kissimmee, Florida, in the Middle District of Florida, which facility leased to an entity called Central Florida Transportation Museum, Inc. Specifically, the defendant MEDLIN, after consenting to a United States Tax Court judgment against him in the approx

Brown v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2003-261 · 2003

You were advised Appeals is relying on Form 4340 to verify that a valid assessment was made, IRC §6303(a), Notice and Demand, and IRC §6331, Notice of Intent to Levy were issued, and your own acknowledgment of receipt of the notice of deficiency to limit challenges to the underlying liability.

ioner’s retirement plan to respondent on June 19, 1998. 2 Respondent did not assess the 10-percent addition to tax for early withdrawals from qualified retirement plans. See sec. 72(t)(1) and (2)(A). For distributions made on account of a levy under sec. 6331 before Dec. 31, 1999, the Commissioner acquiesced following this Court’s decision in Murillo v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-13, affd. without published opinion 166 F.3d 1201 (2d Cir. 1998), and no longer assesses the 10-percent addition t

Flathers v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2003-60 · 2003

ing her to pay the taxes at issue, and that no law authorizes the Service to claim that she owes more income tax than the “zero” reported on her return. In addition the taxpayer states that she did not receive a notice and demand for payment per IRC §6331. Certified transcripts, Forms 4340, for both periods were provided to the taxpayer prior to the hearing. The taxpayer was advised by letter that these tran- scripts meet the verification requirements under IRC §6330(c)(1). * * * At the hearing

Corona Pathology Services, Inc., Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2003-120 · 2003

The final notice also informed petitioner of (1) respondent’s intent to collect that liability through a levy upon its property under section 6331 and (2) petitioner’s right under section 6330 to a 2 We use the term “approximately” because these amounts were computed before the present proceeding and have since increased on account of interest.

Kaye v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2003-74 · 2003

Respondent, pursuant to section 6331, seeks to levy on petitioner’s property.

Michael v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2003-26 · 2003

The final notice informed petitioner of his tax liability for 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997.2 In addition, the final notice informed petitioner of (1) respondent’s intent to collect that liability through a levy upon his property pursuant to section 6331 and (2) petitioner’s right under section 6330 to a hearing with respondent’s Office of Appeals (Appeals) to discuss the proposed levy.

Fink v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2003-61 · 2003

* * * * * * * It is clear before any Appeals officer can recommend the seizure of any property pursuant to Code Section 6331 certain elements have to be present.

Craig v. Commissioner 119 T.C. No. 15 · 2002

Craig of (1) respondent’s intent to levy upon their property pursuant to section 6331 and (2) their right under section 6330 to a Hearing with respondent’s Office of Appeals (Appeals).

Perez v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2002-274 · 2002

86, and June 11, 1990, as to 1987. Petitioner next contends that even if the assessments were properly made, he was not given notice thereof as required by section 6303. He also claims he was not given proper notice of intent to levy as required by section 6331. Both claims are meritless. Forms 4340 for each of the years at issue are in the record and show that petitioner was sent “Statutory Notices of Intent to Levy” on March 18, 1991, and June 19, 1995. Either of these notices is sufficient to

Carlin & Joyce A. Bartschi, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-268 · 2002

The final notice informed petitioners of (1) respondent’s intent to levy upon their property pursuant to section 6331 and (2) petitioners’ right under section 6330 to a hearing with respondent’s Office of Appeals (Appeals).

Keene v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2002-277 · 2002

In addition, the requests boast: If * * * the appeals officer can point out such a statute [i.e., “any statute that requires me ‘to pay’ income taxes”] at my DP [due process] hearing, I will make arrangements to pay whatever amount the appeals officer claims is due for my * * * income taxes.-and the IRS won’t have to resort to seizures under Section 6331 to get it.

Clyde E. & Carole J. Hack, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-244 · 2002

The final notice informed petitioners of (1) respondent’s intention to levy under section 6331 and (2) petitioners’ right under section 6330 to a hearing with respondent’s Office of Appeals (Appeals).

Hill v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2002-272 · 2002

The final levy notice pertained to the subject years and informed petitioner of (1) respondent’s intention to levy under section 6331 and (2) petitioner’s right under section 6330 to a hearing with respondent’s Office of Appeals (Appeals).

Voorhees v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2002-289 · 2002

As we have indicated above, on August 21, 2001, and in accordance with section 6331, respondent issued to petitioners a notice of intent to levy.

Armstrong v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2002-224 · 2002

This letter is your notice of our intent to levy under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 6331 and your right to receive Appeals consideration under IRC Section 6330.

Kiley v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2002-315 · 2002

Petitioner attached to this Form 12153 the same 2-page typewritten statement and exhibit that he attached to his previously filed Form 12153.8 The following passage from the statement attached to petitioner’s Form 12153 reflects its tenor: It is clear that before any appeals officer can recommend the seizure of any property pursuant to Code Section 6331 certain elements have to be present.

Sponberg v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2002-177 · 2002

- 12 - to levy under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 6331 and your right to receive Appeals consideration under IRC Section 6330.

Clyde E. & Carole J. Hack, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-243 · 2002

The final notice informed petitioners -4- of (1) respondent’s intention to levy under section 6331 and (2) petitioners’ right under section 6330 to a hearing with respondent’s Office of Appeals (Appeals).

Daniel J. & Ruth E. Tapio, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-141 · 2002

oners timely requested a Collection Due Process Hearing and raised the following questions in their request: (1) Whether their return filed with respondent had already shown the - 3 - correct amount of tax, precluding the assessment of additional amounts; (2) whether respondent had authority to determine or collect additional tax; and (3) whether section 6331 applied in this case.

Paul F. & Eleanore M. Nichols, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2002-317 · 2002

In addition, the final levy notice informed petitioners of (1) respondent’s intent to collect that liability through a levy upon their property pursuant to section 6331 and (2) petitioners’ right under section 6330 to a hearing with respondent’s Office of Appeals (Appeals) to discuss the proposed levy.

Mann v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2002-48 · 2002

The September 13 notice informed petitioner of (1) respondent's intention to levy under section 6331 and (2) petitioner's right to Appeals Office consideration.

Standifird v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2002-245 · 2002

The final notice -4- informed petitioner of (1) respondent’s intention to levy under section 6331 and (2) petitioner’s right under section 6330 to a hearing with respondent’s Office of Appeals (Appeals).

Parker v. Commissioner 117 T.C. No. 6 · 2001

Pursuant to section 6331, respondent notified petitioner on September 14, 1999, that respondent intended to levy upon petitioner’s property in order to collect Federal income taxes and additions thereto and/or penalties (collectively, taxes) claimed due from petitioner for 1986 through 1996.

Watson v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2001-213 · 2001

Section 6331 Section 6331(a) provides that, if any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay such tax within 10 days after notice and demand for payment, the Secretary is authorized to collect such tax by levy upon property belonging to the taxpayer. Section 6331(d) provides that the Secretary is obliged to provide the taxpayer with n

Strickland v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2001-312 · 2001

This letter is your notice of our intent to levy under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 6331 and your right to receive Appeals consideration under IRC Section 6330.

Lindsay v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2001-285 · 2001

changes, in the FINAL NOTICE OF INTENT TO LEVY with which you disagree and why you disagree: Respondent erred in its administrative procedure against petitioner in issuing - 7 - the notice of levy pursuant to §6331.[4] Request is made that this matter be transferred to the appeals branch of the IRS on the grounds that the information supporting the notice of levy is not complete and is erroneous.

Tipp v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2001-272 · 2001

On October 12, 1999, respondent mailed to petitioner a Final Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing pursuant to section 6331.1 The notice stated that petitioner owed taxes, penalties, and interest totaling $4,132.11 for the 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

This letter is your notice of our intent to levy under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 6331 and your right to receive Appeals consideration under IRC Section 6330.

Pierson v. Commissioner 115 T.C. No. 39 · 2000

The notice stated that petitioner owed tax and additional amounts totaling $8,309.06 for the taxable year 1988 and that respondent was preparing to collect this amount. The notice also stated that petitioner would be given 30 days to request an Appeals Office hearing. Petitioner requested a hearing with respondent's Appeals Office. On Ju

Goza v. Commissioner 114 T.C. No. 12 · 2000

On February 17, 1999, respondent mailed a final notice of intent to levy to petitioner pursuant to section 6331.

Howard v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2000-319 · 2000

The notice stated that petitioner owed taxes, penalties, and interest totaling $329,918.45 and $147,568.72 for the taxable years 1987 and 1988, respectively, and that respondent was preparing to collect these amounts by levy. The notice further stated that petitioner would be given 30 days to request a hearing with respondent's Appeals O

MacElvain v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2000-320 · 2000

The notice states that petitioner owes taxes, interest, and penalties for the years and in the amounts as follows: Year Amount 1980 $ 793,308.52 1981 1,632,232.54 1982 278,290.41 1983 1,278,878.58 1984 175,098.63 1985 404,236.97 1986 196,256.57 The notice also states that respondent is preparing to collect these amounts and that petition

Offiler v. Commissioner 114 T.C. 492 · 2000

This letter is your notice of our intent to levy under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 6331 and your right to receive Appeals consideration under IRC Section 6330.

McWilliams v. Commissioner 103 T.C. 416 · 1994

As used in section 6331, the term “tax” includes any interest, additions to tax, and any other amounts provided by law, including assessable penalties, together with costs and expenses.

Eichler v. Commissioner 143 T.C. 30 · 2014
Dixon v. Commissioner 141 T.C. 173 · 2013
Weber v. Commissioner 138 T.C. 348 · 2012
Johnson v. Commissioner 136 T.C. 475 · 2011
Thornberry v. Commissioner 136 T.C. 356 · 2011
Wadleigh v. Commissioner 134 T.C. 280 · 2010
Dalton v. Commissioner 135 T.C. 393 · 2010
Michael v. Commissioner 133 T.C. 237 · 2009
Vinatieri v. Commissioner 133 T.C. 392 · 2009
Freije v. Commissioner 125 T.C. 14 · 2005
Boyd v. Commissioner 124 T.C. 296 · 2005
Enos v. Commissioner 123 T.C. 284 · 2004
Craig v. Commissioner 119 T.C. 252 · 2002
Parker v. Commissioner 117 T.C. 63 · 2001
Pierson v. Commissioner 115 T.C. 576 · 2000
Goza v. Commissioner 114 T.C. 176 · 2000
Miravalle v. Commissioner 105 T.C. 65 · 1995
Williams v. Commissioner 92 T.C. 920 · 1989
Larotonda v. Commissioner 89 T.C. 287 · 1987
Guzzetta v. Commissioner 78 T.C. 173 · 1982
United States v. Ronald Byers 133 F.4th 824 · Cir.
United States v. Wells · Cir.
Wagenknecht v. United States 509 F.3d 729 · Cir.
Wagenknecht v. United States 533 F.3d 412 · Cir.
Golden v. Commissioner 548 F.3d 487 · Cir.
United States v. Moskowitz, Passman & Edelman 603 F.3d 162 · Cir.
Boyd v. Commissioner of IRS 451 F.3d 8 · Cir.
Scheafnocker v. Commissioner 642 F.3d 428 · Cir.
Grable & Sons Metal v. Darue Engineering · Cir.
Wagenknecht v. IRS · Cir.
Robert Golden v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue · Cir.
Thomas More Law Center v. Barack Obama · Cir.
Univ Chicago v. United States · Cir.
VI Bur Internal v. Chase Manhattan Bank · Cir.
United States v. Donald Wanland, Jr. 830 F.3d 947 · Cir.
Our Country Home Enterprises, Inc. v. Commissioner 855 F.3d 773 · Cir.
Gold Forever Music, Inc. v. United States 920 F.3d 1096 · Cir.
Arlin Geophysical Company v. United States 946 F.3d 1234 · Cir.
United States v. Edward Holland, Jr. 953 F.3d 397 · Cir.
Taproot Administrative Services, Inc. v. Commissioner 679 F.3d 1109 · Cir.
Sachs v. United States 59 F. App'x 116 · Cir.
Sandra L. Craft, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Acting Through the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee 233 F.3d 358 · Cir.
Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue v. Chase Manhattan Bank, Defendant/third-Party v. William Lansdale, Third-Party 312 F.3d 131 · Cir.
United States v. Ripa 323 F.3d 73 · Cir.
Elbert L. Hatchett and Laurestine Hatchett v. United States 330 F.3d 875 · Cir.
Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Manufacturing 377 F.3d 592 · Cir.
Robert Gessert v. United States 703 F.3d 1028 · Cir.
United States v. Ripa 323 F.3d 73 · Cir.
Ronald Goldberg v. CIR 73 F.4th 537 · Cir.
Gail Goldberg v. CIR · Cir.
United States v. Schiller 81 F.4th 64 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.