§6402 — Authority to make credits or refunds
124 citing cases
Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §6402
In the case of any overpayment, the Secretary, within the applicable period of limitations, may credit the amount of such overpayment, including any interest allowed thereon, against any liability in respect of an internal revenue tax on the part of the person who made the overpayment and shall, subject to subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f), refund any balance to such person.
The Secretary is authorized to prescribe regulations providing for the crediting against the estimated income tax for any taxable year of the amount determined by the taxpayer or the Secretary to be an overpayment of the income tax for a preceding taxable year.
The amount of any overpayment to be refunded to the person making the overpayment shall be reduced by the amount of any past-due support (as defined in section 464(c) of the Social Security Act) owed by that person of which the Secretary has been notified by a State in accordance with section 464 of such Act. The Secretary shall remit the amount by which the overpayment is so reduced to the State collecting such support and notify the person making the overpayment that so much of the overpayment as was necessary to satisfy his obligation for past-due support has been paid to the State. The Secretary shall apply a reduction under this subsection first to an amount certified by the State as past due support under section 464 of the Social Security Act before any other reductions allowed by law. This subsection shall be applied to an overpayment prior to its being credited to a person’s future liability for an internal revenue tax. For purposes of this subsection, any reference to a State shall include a reference to any Indian tribe or tribal organization receiving a grant under section 455(f) of the Social Security Act.
Upon receiving notice from any Federal agency that a named person owes a past-due legally enforceable debt (other than past-due support subject to the provisions of subsection (c)) to such agency, the Secretary shall—
reduce the amount of any overpayment payable to such person by the amount of such debt;
pay the amount by which such overpayment is reduced under subparagraph (A) to such agency; and
notify the person making such overpayment that such overpayment has been reduced by an amount necessary to satisfy such debt.
Any overpayment by a person shall be reduced pursuant to this subsection after such overpayment is reduced pursuant to subsection (c) with respect to past-due support collected pursuant to an assignment under section 408(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 608(a)(3)) and before such overpayment is reduced pursuant to subsections (e) and (f) and before such overpayment is credited to the future liability for tax of such person pursuant to subsection (b). If the Secretary receives notice from a Federal agency or agencies of more than one debt subject to paragraph (1) that is owed by a person to such agency or agencies, any overpayment by such person shall be applied against such debts in the order in which such debts accrued.
Paragraph (1) shall apply with respect to an OASDI overpayment only if the requirements of paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 3720A(f) of title 31, United States Code, are met with respect to such overpayment.
In the case of a debt consisting of an OASDI overpayment, if the Secretary determines upon receipt of the notice referred to in paragraph (1) that the refund from which the reduction described in paragraph (1)(A) would be made is based upon a joint return, the Secretary shall—
notify each taxpayer filing such joint return that the reduction is being made from a refund based upon such return, and
include in such notification a description of the procedures to be followed, in the case of a joint return, to protect the share of the refund which may be payable to another person.
If the other person filing a joint return with the person owing the OASDI overpayment takes appropriate action to secure his or her proper share of the refund subject to reduction under this subsection, the Secretary shall pay such share to such other person. The Secretary shall deduct the amount of such payment from amounts which are derived from subsequent reductions in refunds under this subsection and are payable to a trust fund referred to in subparagraph (C).
In lieu of payment, pursuant to paragraph (1)(B), of the amount of any reduction under this subsection to the Commissioner of Social Security, the Secretary shall deposit such amount in the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund or the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund, whichever is certified to the Secretary as appropriate by the Commissioner of Social Security.
For purposes of this paragraph, the term “OASDI overpayment” means any overpayment of benefits made to an individual under title II of the Social Security Act.
Upon receiving notice from any State that a named person owes a past-due, legally enforceable State income tax obligation to such State, the Secretary shall, under such conditions as may be prescribed by the Secretary—
reduce the amount of any overpayment payable to such person by the amount of such State income tax obligation;
pay the amount by which such overpayment is reduced under subparagraph (A) to such State and notify such State of such person’s name, taxpayer identification number, address, and the amount collected; and
notify the person making such overpayment that the overpayment has been reduced by an amount necessary to satisfy a past-due, legally enforceable State income tax obligation.
If an offset is made pursuant to a joint return, the notice under subparagraph (B) shall include the names, taxpayer identification numbers, and addresses of each person filing such return.
Paragraph (1) shall apply to an overpayment by any person for a taxable year only if the address shown on the Federal return for such taxable year of the overpayment is an address within the State seeking the offset.
Any overpayment by a person shall be reduced pursuant to this subsection—
after such overpayment is reduced pursuant to—
subsection (a) with respect to any liability for any internal revenue tax on the part of the person who made the overpayment;
subsection (c) with respect to past-due support; and
subsection (d) with respect to any past-due, legally enforceable debt owed to a Federal agency; and
before such overpayment is credited to the future liability for any Federal internal revenue tax of such person pursuant to subsection (b).
If the Secretary receives notice from one or more agencies of the State of more than one debt subject to paragraph (1) or subsection (f) that is owed by such person to such an agency, any overpayment by such person shall be applied against such debts in the order in which such debts accrued.
No State may take action under this subsection until such State—
notifies by certified mail with return receipt the person owing the past-due State income tax liability that the State proposes to take action pursuant to this section;
gives such person at least 60 days to present evidence that all or part of such liability is not past-due or not legally enforceable;
considers any evidence presented by such person and determines that an amount of such debt is past-due and legally enforceable; and
satisfies such other conditions as the Secretary may prescribe to ensure that the determination made under subparagraph (C) is valid and that the State has made reasonable efforts to obtain payment of such State income tax obligation.
For purposes of this subsection, the term “past-due, legally enforceable State income tax obligation” means a debt—
which resulted from—
a judgment rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction which has determined an amount of State income tax to be due; or
a determination after an administrative hearing which has determined an amount of State income tax to be due; and
which is no longer subject to judicial review; or
which resulted from a State income tax which has been assessed but not collected, the time for redetermination of which has expired, and which has not been delinquent for more than 10 years.
For purposes of this paragraph, the term “State income tax” includes any local income tax administered by the chief tax administration agency of the State.
The Secretary shall issue regulations prescribing the time and manner in which States must submit notices of past-due, legally enforceable State income tax obligations and the necessary information that must be contained in or accompany such notices. The regulations shall specify the types of State income taxes and the minimum amount of debt to which the reduction procedure established by paragraph (1) may be applied. The regulations may require States to pay a fee to reimburse the Secretary for the cost of applying such procedure. Any fee paid to the Secretary pursuant to the preceding sentence shall be used to reimburse appropriations which bore all or part of the cost of applying such procedure.
Any State receiving notice from the Secretary that an erroneous payment has been made to such State under paragraph (1) shall pay promptly to the Secretary, in accordance with such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, an amount equal to the amount of such erroneous payment (without regard to whether any other amounts payable to such State under such paragraph have been paid to such State).
Upon receiving notice from any State that a named person owes a covered unemployment compensation debt to such State, the Secretary shall, under such conditions as may be prescribed by the Secretary—
reduce the amount of any overpayment payable to such person by the amount of such covered unemployment compensation debt;
pay the amount by which such overpayment is reduced under subparagraph (A) to such State and notify such State of such person’s name, taxpayer identification number, address, and the amount collected; and
notify the person making such overpayment that the overpayment has been reduced by an amount necessary to satisfy a covered unemployment compensation debt.
If an offset is made pursuant to a joint return, the notice under subparagraph (C) shall include information related to the rights of a spouse of a person subject to such an offset.
Any overpayment by a person shall be reduced pursuant to this subsection—
after such overpayment is reduced pursuant to—
subsection (a) with respect to any liability for any internal revenue tax on the part of the person who made the overpayment;
subsection (c) with respect to past-due support; and
subsection (d) with respect to any past-due, legally enforceable debt owed to a Federal agency; and
before such overpayment is credited to the future liability for any Federal internal revenue tax of such person pursuant to subsection (b).
If the Secretary receives notice from a State or States of more than one debt subject to paragraph (1) or subsection (e) that is owed by a person to such State or States, any overpayment by such person shall be applied against such debts in the order in which such debts accrued.
No State may take action under this subsection until such State—
notifies the person owing the covered unemployment compensation debt that the State proposes to take action pursuant to this section;
provides such person at least 60 days to present evidence that all or part of such liability is not legally enforceable or is not a covered unemployment compensation debt;
considers any evidence presented by such person and determines that an amount of such debt is legally enforceable and is a covered unemployment compensation debt; and
satisfies such other conditions as the Secretary may prescribe to ensure that the determination made under subparagraph (C) is valid and that the State has made reasonable efforts to obtain payment of such covered unemployment compensation debt.
For purposes of this subsection, the term “covered unemployment compensation debt” means—
a past-due debt for erroneous payment of unemployment compensation due to fraud or the person’s failure to report earnings which has become final under the law of a State certified by the Secretary of Labor pursuant to section 3304 and which remains uncollected;
contributions due to the unemployment fund of a State for which the State has determined the person to be liable and which remain uncollected; and
any penalties and interest assessed on such debt.
The Secretary may issue regulations prescribing the time and manner in which States must submit notices of covered unemployment compensation debt and the necessary information that must be contained in or accompany such notices. The regulations may specify the minimum amount of debt to which the reduction procedure established by paragraph (1) may be applied.
The regulations may require States to pay a fee to the Secretary, which may be deducted from amounts collected, to reimburse the Secretary for the cost of applying such procedure. Any fee paid to the Secretary pursuant to the preceding sentence shall be used to reimburse appropriations which bore all or part of the cost of applying such procedure.
The regulations may include a requirement that States submit notices of covered unemployment compensation debt to the Secretary via the Secretary of Labor in accordance with procedures established by the Secretary of Labor. Such procedures may require States to pay a fee to the Secretary of Labor to reimburse the Secretary of Labor for the costs of applying this subsection. Any such fee shall be established in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury. Any fee paid to the Secretary of Labor may be deducted from amounts collected and shall be used to reimburse the appropriation account which bore all or part of the cost of applying this subsection.
Any State receiving notice from the Secretary that an erroneous payment has been made to such State under paragraph (1) shall pay promptly to the Secretary, in accordance with such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, an amount equal to the amount of such erroneous payment (without regard to whether any other amounts payable to such State under such paragraph have been paid to such State).
No court of the United States shall have jurisdiction to hear any action, whether legal or equitable, brought to restrain or review a reduction authorized by subsection (c), (d), (e), or (f). No such reduction shall be subject to review by the Secretary in an administrative proceeding. No action brought against the United States to recover the amount of any such reduction shall be considered to be a suit for refund of tax. This subsection does not preclude any legal, equitable, or administrative action against the Federal agency or State to which the amount of such reduction was paid or any such action against the Commissioner of Social Security which is otherwise available with respect to recoveries of overpayments of benefits under section 204 of the Social Security Act.
For purposes of this section, the term “Federal agency” means a department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States, and includes a Government corporation (as such term is defined in section 103 of title 5, United States Code).
The Secretary may provide that, for purposes of determining interest, the payment of any amount withheld under subsection (c), (e), or (f) to a State shall be treated as a payment to the person or persons making the overpayment.
For procedures relating to agency notification of the Secretary, see section 3721 of title 31, United States Code.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the case of an insolvent corporation which is a member of an affiliated group of corporations filing a consolidated return for any taxable year and which is subject to a statutory or court-appointed fiduciary, the Secretary may by regulation provide that any refund for such taxable year may be paid on behalf of such insolvent corporation to such fiduciary to the extent that the Secretary determines that the refund is attributable to losses or credits of such insolvent corporation.
In the case of a disallowance of a claim for refund, the Secretary shall provide the taxpayer with an explanation for such disallowance.
No credit or refund of an overpayment for a taxable year shall be made to a taxpayer before the 15th day of the second month following the close of such taxable year if a credit is allowed to such taxpayer under section 24 (by reason of subsection (d) thereof) or 32 for such taxable year.
Not later than the date which is 6 months after the date of the enactment of the Taxpayer First Act, the Secretary shall prescribe regulations to establish procedures to allow for—
taxpayers to report instances in which a refund made by the Secretary by electronic funds transfer was not transferred to the account of the taxpayer;
coordination with financial institutions for the purpose of—
identifying the accounts to which transfers described in paragraph (1) were made; and
recovery of the amounts so transferred; and
the refund to be delivered to the correct account of the taxpayer.
Treasury Regulations
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-1Authority to make credits or refunds
The Commissioner, within the applicable period of limitations, may credit any overpayment of tax, including interest thereon, against any outstanding liability for any tax (or for any interest, additional amount, addition to the tax, or assessable penalty) owed by the person making the overpayment and the balance, if any, shall be refunded, subject to sections 6402 (c) and (d) and the regulations thereunder, to that person by the Commissioner.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-2Claims for credit or refund
(a) Requirement that claim be filed. (1) Credits or refunds of overpayments may not be allowed or made after the expiration of the statutory period of limitation properly applicable unless, before the expiration of such period, a claim therefor has been filed by the taxpayer. Furthermore, under section 7422, a civil action for refund may not be instituted unless a claim has been filed within the properly applicable period of limitation.
(2) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of § 301.6091-1 (relating to hand-carried documents), if a taxpayer is required to file a claim for credit or refund using a particular form, then the claim, together with appropriate supporting evidence, shall be filed in a manner consistent with such form, form instructions, publications, or other guidance found on the IRS.gov Web site. If a taxpayer is filing a claim in response to an IRS notice or correspondence, then the claim must be filed in accordance with the specific instructions contained in the notice or correspondence regarding the manner of filing. Any other claim not described in the preceding sentences generally must be filed with the service center at which the taxpayer currently would be required to file a tax return for the type of tax to which the claim relates or via the appropriate electronic portal. For rules relating to interest in the case of credits or refunds, see section 6611. For rules treating timely mailing as timely filing, see section 7502. For rules relating to the time for filing a claim when the last day falls on Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday, see section 7503.
(b) Grounds set forth in claim. (1) No refund or credit will be allowed after the expiration of the statutory period of limitation applicable to the filing of a claim therefor except upon one or more of the grounds set forth in a claim filed before the expiration of such period. The claim must set forth in detail each ground upon which a credit or refund is claimed and facts sufficient to apprise the Commissioner of the exact basis thereof. The statement of the grounds and facts must be verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury. A claim which does not comply with this paragraph will not be considered for any purpose as a claim for refund or credit.
(2) The IRS does not have the authority to refund on equitable grounds penalties or other amounts legally collected.
(c) Form for filing claim. If a particular form is prescribed on which the claim must be made, then the claim must be made on the form so prescribed. For special rules applicable to refunds of income taxes, see § 301.6402-3. For provisions relating to credits and refunds of taxes other than income tax, see the regulations relating to the particular tax. All claims by taxpayers for the refund of taxes, interest, penalties, and additions to tax that are not otherwise provided for must be made on Form 843, “Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement.”
(d) Separate claims for separate taxable periods. In the case of income and gift taxes, income tax withheld, taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, taxes under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and taxes under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, a separate claim must be made for each return for each taxable period.
(e) Proof of representative capacity. If a return is filed by an individual and, after his death, a refund claim is filed by his legal representative, certified copies of the letters testamentary, letters of administration, or other similar evidence must be annexed to the claim, to show the authority of the legal representative to file the claim. If an executor, administrator, guardian, trustee, receiver, or other fiduciary files a return and thereafter a refund claim is filed by the same fiduciary, documentary evidence to establish the legal authority of the fiduciary need not accompany the claim, provided a statement is made in the claim showing that the return was filed by the fiduciary and that the latter is still acting. In such cases, if a refund is to be paid, letters testamentary, letters of administration, or other evidence may be required, but should be submitted only upon the receipt of a specific request therefor. If a claim is filed by a fiduciary other than the one by whom the return was filed, the necessary documentary evidence should accompany the claim. A claim may be executed by an agent of the person assessed, but in such case a power of attorney must accompany the claim.
(f) Mailing of refund check. (1) Checks in payment of claims allowed will be drawn in the names of the persons entitled to the money and, except as provided in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph (f), the checks may be sent direct to the claimant or to such person in care of an attorney or agent who has filed a power of attorney specifically authorizing him to receive such checks.
(2) Checks in payment of claims which have either been reduced to judgment or settled in the course or as a result of litigation will be drawn in the name of the person or persons entitled to the money and will be sent to the Assistant Attorney General, Tax Division, Department of Justice, for delivery to the taxpayer or the counsel of record in the court proceeding.
(3) For restrictions on the assignment of claims, see section 3477 of the Revised Statutes (31 U.S.C. 203).
(g) Misdirected direct deposit refund—(1) Definition. The term misdirected direct deposit refund includes any refund of an overpayment of tax that is disbursed as a direct deposit but is not deposited into the account designated on the claim for refund to receive the direct deposit refund.
(2) Procedures for reporting a misdirected direct deposit refund—(i) In general. A taxpayer or a taxpayer's authorized representative may report to the IRS that the taxpayer never received a direct deposit refund and request a replacement refund. The report must include the name of the taxpayer who requested the refund, the taxpayer identification number of the taxpayer, the taxpayer's mailing address, the type of return to which the refund is related, the account number and routing number that the taxpayer requested the refund be directly deposited into, and any other information necessary to locate the misdirected direct deposit refund.
(ii) How to report a misdirected direct deposit refund. A reporting described in paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this section may be made in the following ways:
(A) By calling the IRS;
(B) On the form prescribed by the IRS and in accordance with the applicable publications, instructions, or other appropriate guidance;
(C) By contacting the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate by telephone, by mail, facsimile, or in person; or
(D) By submitting the appropriate form in person at a Taxpayer Assistance Center.
(3) Procedures for coordination with financial institutions—(i) Identification of the account that received the misdirected direct deposit refund. If the IRS receives a report described in paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this section, the IRS will confirm that the overpayment was issued as a direct deposit. The IRS will confirm that the overpayment was not credited or offset pursuant to the law in effect immediately prior to the direct deposit being disbursed. If the direct deposit described in the report was issued, the IRS will initiate a refund trace to request the assistance of the Department of the Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service. In accordance with its own procedures, the Bureau of the Fiscal Service coordinates with the financial institution that holds directly or indirectly the deposit account into which the refund was made, requesting from the financial institution such information as is necessary to identify whether the financial institution received the refund; whether the financial institution returned, or will return, the refund to the IRS, or if no funds are available for return; whether a deposit was made into the account designated on the claim for refund; and the identity of the deposit account owner to whom the deposit was disbursed.
(ii) Coordination to recover the amounts transferred. Recovery of the misdirected direct deposit refund from a financial institution shall follow the procedures established by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. The Bureau of the Fiscal Service shall request the return of the misdirected direct deposit refund from the financial institution that received it. The IRS may contact the financial institution directly to recover the misdirected direct deposit refund.
(4) Issuance of replacement refund. When the IRS has determined that a misdirected direct deposit refund has occurred, the IRS will issue a replacement refund in the full amount of the refund that was misdirected. The replacement refund may be issued as a direct deposit or as a paper check sent to the taxpayer's last known address.
(5) Applicability of this paragraph (g) to missing refunds. The provisions of paragraphs (g)(2) through (g)(3)(i) of this section should be used for any refund that was disbursed as a direct deposit and that the taxpayer reports as missing. For example, although a refund that was deposited into an incorrect bank account because the taxpayer transposed two digits in their bank account number is not considered to be a misdirected direct deposit refund, the provisions of paragraphs (g)(2) through (g)(3)(i) of this section should be used. If the application of these procedures results in an amount recovered by the IRS, the recovered amount will be refunded or credited as allowed by law.
(h) Applicability dates.
Paragraphs (a)(2), (b)(2), (c), and (d) of this section apply to claims for credit or refund filed on or after July 24, 2015. Paragraphs (a)(1), (b)(1), (e), and (f) of this section apply to claims for credit or refund filed before, on or after July 24, 2015. Paragraph (g) of this section applies to reports described in paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this section made after December 22, 2020.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-2(a)Requirement that claim be filed.
Requirement that claim be filed. (1) Credits or refunds of overpayments may not be allowed or made after the expiration of the statutory period of limitation properly applicable unless, before the expiration of such period, a claim therefor has been filed by the taxpayer. Furthermore, under section 7422, a civil action for refund may not be instituted unless a claim has been filed within the properly applicable period of limitation.
(2) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of § 301.6091-1 (relating to hand-carried documents), if a taxpayer is required to file a claim for credit or refund using a particular form, then the claim, together with appropriate supporting evidence, shall be filed in a manner consistent with such form, form instructions, publications, or other guidance found on the IRS.gov Web site. If a taxpayer is filing a claim in response to an IRS notice or correspondence, then the claim must be filed in accordance with the specific instructions contained in the notice or correspondence regarding the manner of filing. Any other claim not described in the preceding sentences generally must be filed with the service center at which the taxpayer currently would be required to file a tax return for the type of tax to which the claim relates or via the appropriate electronic portal. For rules relating to interest in the case of credits or refunds, see section 6611. For rules treating timely mailing as timely filing, see section 7502. For rules relating to the time for filing a claim when the last day falls on Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday, see section 7503.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-2(b)Grounds set forth in claim.
Grounds set forth in claim. (1) No refund or credit will be allowed after the expiration of the statutory period of limitation applicable to the filing of a claim therefor except upon one or more of the grounds set forth in a claim filed before the expiration of such period. The claim must set forth in detail each ground upon which a credit or refund is claimed and facts sufficient to apprise the Commissioner of the exact basis thereof. The statement of the grounds and facts must be verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury. A claim which does not comply with this paragraph will not be considered for any purpose as a claim for refund or credit.
(2) The IRS does not have the authority to refund on equitable grounds penalties or other amounts legally collected.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-2(c)Form for filing claim.
Form for filing claim. If a particular form is prescribed on which the claim must be made, then the claim must be made on the form so prescribed. For special rules applicable to refunds of income taxes, see § 301.6402-3. For provisions relating to credits and refunds of taxes other than income tax, see the regulations relating to the particular tax. All claims by taxpayers for the refund of taxes, interest, penalties, and additions to tax that are not otherwise provided for must be made on Form 843, “Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement.”
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-2(d)Separate claims for separate taxable periods.
Separate claims for separate taxable periods. In the case of income and gift taxes, income tax withheld, taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, taxes under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and taxes under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, a separate claim must be made for each return for each taxable period.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-2(e)Proof of representative capacity.
Proof of representative capacity. If a return is filed by an individual and, after his death, a refund claim is filed by his legal representative, certified copies of the letters testamentary, letters of administration, or other similar evidence must be annexed to the claim, to show the authority of the legal representative to file the claim. If an executor, administrator, guardian, trustee, receiver, or other fiduciary files a return and thereafter a refund claim is filed by the same fiduciary, documentary evidence to establish the legal authority of the fiduciary need not accompany the claim, provided a statement is made in the claim showing that the return was filed by the fiduciary and that the latter is still acting. In such cases, if a refund is to be paid, letters testamentary, letters of administration, or other evidence may be required, but should be submitted only upon the receipt of a specific request therefor. If a claim is filed by a fiduciary other than the one by whom the return was filed, the necessary documentary evidence should accompany the claim. A claim may be executed by an agent of the person assessed, but in such case a power of attorney must accompany the claim.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-2(f)Mailing of refund check.
Mailing of refund check. (1) Checks in payment of claims allowed will be drawn in the names of the persons entitled to the money and, except as provided in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph (f), the checks may be sent direct to the claimant or to such person in care of an attorney or agent who has filed a power of attorney specifically authorizing him to receive such checks.
(2) Checks in payment of claims which have either been reduced to judgment or settled in the course or as a result of litigation will be drawn in the name of the person or persons entitled to the money and will be sent to the Assistant Attorney General, Tax Division, Department of Justice, for delivery to the taxpayer or the counsel of record in the court proceeding.
(3) For restrictions on the assignment of claims, see section 3477 of the Revised Statutes (31 U.S.C. 203).
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-2(g)Misdirected direct deposit refund—(1) Definition.
Misdirected direct deposit refund—(1) Definition. The term misdirected direct deposit refund includes any refund of an overpayment of tax that is disbursed as a direct deposit but is not deposited into the account designated on the claim for refund to receive the direct deposit refund.
(2) Procedures for reporting a misdirected direct deposit refund—(i) In general. A taxpayer or a taxpayer's authorized representative may report to the IRS that the taxpayer never received a direct deposit refund and request a replacement refund. The report must include the name of the taxpayer who requested the refund, the taxpayer identification number of the taxpayer, the taxpayer's mailing address, the type of return to which the refund is related, the account number and routing number that the taxpayer requested the refund be directly deposited into, and any other information necessary to locate the misdirected direct deposit refund.
(ii) How to report a misdirected direct deposit refund. A reporting described in paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this section may be made in the following ways:
(A) By calling the IRS;
(B) On the form prescribed by the IRS and in accordance with the applicable publications, instructions, or other appropriate guidance;
(C) By contacting the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate by telephone, by mail, facsimile, or in person; or
(D) By submitting the appropriate form in person at a Taxpayer Assistance Center.
(3) Procedures for coordination with financial institutions—(i) Identification of the account that received the misdirected direct deposit refund. If the IRS receives a report described in paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this section, the IRS will confirm that the overpayment was issued as a direct deposit. The IRS will confirm that the overpayment was not credited or offset pursuant to the law in effect immediately prior to the direct deposit being disbursed. If the direct deposit described in the report was issued, the IRS will initiate a refund trace to request the assistance of the Department of the Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service. In accordance with its own procedures, the Bureau of the Fiscal Service coordinates with the financial institution that holds directly or indirectly the deposit account into which the refund was made, requesting from the financial institution such information as is necessary to identify whether the financial institution received the refund; whether the financial institution returned, or will return, the refund to the IRS, or if no funds are available for return; whether a deposit was made into the account designated on the claim for refund; and the identity of the deposit account owner to whom the deposit was disbursed.
(ii) Coordination to recover the amounts transferred. Recovery of the misdirected direct deposit refund from a financial institution shall follow the procedures established by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. The Bureau of the Fiscal Service shall request the return of the misdirected direct deposit refund from the financial institution that received it. The IRS may contact the financial institution directly to recover the misdirected direct deposit refund.
(4) Issuance of replacement refund. When the IRS has determined that a misdirected direct deposit refund has occurred, the IRS will issue a replacement refund in the full amount of the refund that was misdirected. The replacement refund may be issued as a direct deposit or as a paper check sent to the taxpayer's last known address.
(5) Applicability of this paragraph (g) to missing refunds. The provisions of paragraphs (g)(2) through (g)(3)(i) of this section should be used for any refund that was disbursed as a direct deposit and that the taxpayer reports as missing. For example, although a refund that was deposited into an incorrect bank account because the taxpayer transposed two digits in their bank account number is not considered to be a misdirected direct deposit refund, the provisions of paragraphs (g)(2) through (g)(3)(i) of this section should be used. If the application of these procedures results in an amount recovered by the IRS, the recovered amount will be refunded or credited as allowed by law.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-2(h)Applicability dates.
Applicability dates.
Paragraphs (a)(2), (b)(2), (c), and (d) of this section apply to claims for credit or refund filed on or after July 24, 2015. Paragraphs (a)(1), (b)(1), (e), and (f) of this section apply to claims for credit or refund filed before, on or after July 24, 2015. Paragraph (g) of this section applies to reports described in paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this section made after December 22, 2020.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-3Special rules applicable to income tax
(a) The following rules apply to a claim for credit or refund of income tax:—
(1) In general, in the case of an overpayment of income taxes, a claim for credit or refund of such overpayment shall be made on the appropriate income tax return.
(2) In the case of an overpayment of income taxes for a taxable year of an individual for which a Form 1040 or 1040A has been filed, a claim for refund shall be made on Form 1040X (“Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return”).
(3) In the case of an overpayment of income taxes for a taxable year of a corporation for which a Form 1120 has been filed, a claim for refund shall be made on Form 1120X (“Amended U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return”).
(4) In the case of an overpayment of income taxes for a taxable year for which a form other than Form 1040, 1040A, or 1120 was filed (such as Form 1041 (U.S. Fiduciary Income Tax Return) or Form 990T (Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return)), a claim for credit or refund shall be made on the appropriate amended income tax return.
(5) A properly executed individual, fiduciary, or corporation original income tax return or an amended return (on 1040X or 1120X if applicable) shall constitute a claim for refund or credit within the meaning of section 6402 and section 6511 for the amount of the overpayment disclosed by such return (or amended return). For purposes of section 6511, such claim shall be considered as filed on the date on which such return (or amended return) is considered as filed, except that if the requirements of § 301.7502-1, relating to timely mailing treated as timely filing are met, the claim shall be considered to be filed on the date of the postmark stamped on the cover in which the return (or amended return) was mailed. A return or amended return shall constitute a claim for refund or credit if it contains a statement setting forth the amount determined as an overpayment and advising whether such amount shall be refunded to the taxpayer or shall be applied as a credit against the taxpayer's estimated income tax for the taxable year immediately succeeding the taxable year for which such return (or amended return) is filed. If the taxpayer indicates on its return (or amended return) that all or part of the overpayment shown by its return (or amended return) is to be applied to its estimated income tax for its succeeding taxable year, such indication shall constitute an election to so apply such overpayment, and no interest shall be allowed on such portion of the overpayment credited and such amount shall be applied as a payment on account of the estimated income tax for such year or the installments thereof.
(6) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(5) of this section, the Internal Revenue Service, within the applicable period of limitations, may credit any overpayment of individual, fiduciary, or corporation income tax, including interest thereon, against—
(i) First, any outstanding liability for any tax (or for any interest, additional amount, additions to the tax, or assessable penalty) owed by the taxpayer making the overpayment;
(ii) Second, in the case of an individual taxpayer, amounts of past-due support assigned to a State under section 402(a)(26) or 471(a)(17) of the Social Security Act under procedures set forth in the regulations under section 6402(c);
(iii) Third, past-due and legally enforceable debt under procedures set forth in the regulations under section 6402(d); and
(iv) Fourth, qualifying amounts of past-due support not assigned to a State under procedures set forth in the regulations under section 6402 (c).
Only the balance, if any, of the overpayment remaining after credits described in this paragraph (a)(6) shall be treated in the manner so elected.
(b) [Reserved]
(c) If the taxpayer is not required to show the tax on the form (see section 6014 and the accompanying regulations), the IRS will treat a properly filed income tax return as a claim for refund and such return will constitute a claim for refund within the meaning of section 6402 and section 6511 for the amount of the overpayment shown by the computation of the tax made by the IRS on the basis of the return. For purposes of the limitations period of section 6511, such claim will be treated as filed on the date the return is treated as filed.
(d) In any case in which a taxpayer elects to have an overpayment refunded to him he may not thereafter change his election to have the overpayment applied as a payment on account of his estimated income tax.
(e) In the case of a nonresident alien individual or foreign corporation, the appropriate income tax return on which the claim for refund or credit is made must contain the tax identification number of the taxpayer required pursuant to section 6109 and the entire amount of income of the taxpayer subject to tax, even if the tax liability for that income was fully satisfied at source through withholding under chapters 3 or 4 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). Also, if the overpayment of tax resulted from the withholding of tax at source under chapter 3 or 4 of the Code, a copy of the Form 1042-S, “Foreign Person's U.S. Source Income subject to Withholding,” Form 8805, “Foreign Partner's Information Statement of Section 1446 Withholding Tax,” or other statement (required under § 1.1446-3(d)(2) of this chapter) required to be provided to the beneficial owner or partner pursuant to § 1.1461-1(c)(1)(i), § 1.1474-1(d)(1)(i), or § 1.1446-3(d) of this chapter must be attached to the return. For purposes of claiming a refund, the Form 8805 or other statement must include the taxpayer identification number of the beneficial owner or partner even if not otherwise required. No claim for refund or credit under chapter 65 of the Code may be made by the taxpayer for any amount that the payor has repaid to the taxpayer pursuant to reimbursement or set-off procedures (described in § 1.1461-2(a)(2),(3) or § 1.1474-2(a)(3), (4) of this chapter). In addition, no claim for refund or credit may be made by a taxpayer for any amount that has been repaid to a qualified intermediary (as described in § 1.1441-1(e)(5)(ii)) or a participating FFI (as described in § 1.1471-1(b)(91)) pursuant to a collective refund filed by such entity on behalf of the taxpayer. See § 1.1441-1(e)(5)(iii) (describing a qualified intermediary agreement) and § 1.1471-4(h) (describing a collective refund). Upon request, a taxpayer must also submit such documentation as the IRS, may require establishing that the taxpayer is the beneficial owner of the income for which a claim for refund or credit is being made and verifying the grounds and facts set forth in taxpayer's claim as required by § 301.6402-2(b)(1). See § 1.1474-5 for additional requirements that may apply in the case of a refund of tax withheld under chapter 4.
(f) Effective/applicability date—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (f)(2) of this section, this section applies on or after January 6, 2017. (For payments made after June 30, 2014, and before January 6, 2017, see this section as in effect and contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2016.)
(2) References in paragraph (e) of this section to Form 8805 or other statements required under § 1.1446-3(d)(2) shall apply to partnership taxable years beginning after April 29, 2008. References in paragraph (e) of this section to amounts withheld under chapter 4 of the Code and claims made with respect to amounts withheld under chapter 4 of the Code shall apply to withholdable payments made after June 30, 2014.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-3(a)§301.6402-3(a)
The following rules apply to a claim for credit or refund of income tax:—
(1) In general, in the case of an overpayment of income taxes, a claim for credit or refund of such overpayment shall be made on the appropriate income tax return.
(2) In the case of an overpayment of income taxes for a taxable year of an individual for which a Form 1040 or 1040A has been filed, a claim for refund shall be made on Form 1040X (“Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return”).
(3) In the case of an overpayment of income taxes for a taxable year of a corporation for which a Form 1120 has been filed, a claim for refund shall be made on Form 1120X (“Amended U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return”).
(4) In the case of an overpayment of income taxes for a taxable year for which a form other than Form 1040, 1040A, or 1120 was filed (such as Form 1041 (U.S. Fiduciary Income Tax Return) or Form 990T (Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return)), a claim for credit or refund shall be made on the appropriate amended income tax return.
(5) A properly executed individual, fiduciary, or corporation original income tax return or an amended return (on 1040X or 1120X if applicable) shall constitute a claim for refund or credit within the meaning of section 6402 and section 6511 for the amount of the overpayment disclosed by such return (or amended return). For purposes of section 6511, such claim shall be considered as filed on the date on which such return (or amended return) is considered as filed, except that if the requirements of § 301.7502-1, relating to timely mailing treated as timely filing are met, the claim shall be considered to be filed on the date of the postmark stamped on the cover in which the return (or amended return) was mailed. A return or amended return shall constitute a claim for refund or credit if it contains a statement setting forth the amount determined as an overpayment and advising whether such amount shall be refunded to the taxpayer or shall be applied as a credit against the taxpayer's estimated income tax for the taxable year immediately succeeding the taxable year for which such return (or amended return) is filed. If the taxpayer indicates on its return (or amended return) that all or part of the overpayment shown by its return (or amended return) is to be applied to its estimated income tax for its succeeding taxable year, such indication shall constitute an election to so apply such overpayment, and no interest shall be allowed on such portion of the overpayment credited and such amount shall be applied as a payment on account of the estimated income tax for such year or the installments thereof.
(6) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(5) of this section, the Internal Revenue Service, within the applicable period of limitations, may credit any overpayment of individual, fiduciary, or corporation income tax, including interest thereon, against—
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-3(b)§301.6402-3(b)
[Reserved]
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-3(c)If the taxpayer is not required to show the tax on the form (see section 6014 and the accompanying regulations), the IRS will treat a properly filed income tax return as a claim for refund and such return will constitute a claim for refund within the meaning of section 6402 and section 6511 for the amount of the overpayment shown by the computation of the tax made by the IRS on the basis of the return.
If the taxpayer is not required to show the tax on the form (see section 6014 and the accompanying regulations), the IRS will treat a properly filed income tax return as a claim for refund and such return will constitute a claim for refund within the meaning of section 6402 and section 6511 for the amount of the overpayment shown by the computation of the tax made by the IRS on the basis of the return. For purposes of the limitations period of section 6511, such claim will be treated as filed on the date the return is treated as filed.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-3(d)In any case in which a taxpayer elects to have an overpayment refunded to him he may not thereafter change his election to have the overpayment applied as a payment on account of his estimated income tax.
In any case in which a taxpayer elects to have an overpayment refunded to him he may not thereafter change his election to have the overpayment applied as a payment on account of his estimated income tax.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-3(e)In the case of a nonresident alien individual or foreign corporation, the appropriate income tax return on which the claim for refund or credit is made must contain the tax identification number of the taxpayer required pursuant to section 6109 and the entire amount of income of the taxpayer subject to tax, even if the tax liability for that income was fully satisfied at source through withholding under chapters 3 or 4 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
In the case of a nonresident alien individual or foreign corporation, the appropriate income tax return on which the claim for refund or credit is made must contain the tax identification number of the taxpayer required pursuant to section 6109 and the entire amount of income of the taxpayer subject to tax, even if the tax liability for that income was fully satisfied at source through withholding under chapters 3 or 4 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). Also, if the overpayment of tax resulted from the withholding of tax at source under chapter 3 or 4 of the Code, a copy of the Form 1042-S, “Foreign Person's U.S. Source Income subject to Withholding,” Form 8805, “Foreign Partner's Information Statement of Section 1446 Withholding Tax,” or other statement (required under § 1.1446-3(d)(2) of this chapter) required to be provided to the beneficial owner or partner pursuant to § 1.1461-1(c)(1)(i), § 1.1474-1(d)(1)(i), or § 1.1446-3(d) of this chapter must be attached to the return. For purposes of claiming a refund, the Form 8805 or other statement must include the taxpayer identification number of the beneficial owner or partner even if not otherwise required. No claim for refund or credit under chapter 65 of the Code may be made by the taxpayer for any amount that the payor has repaid to the taxpayer pursuant to reimbursement or set-off procedures (described in § 1.1461-2(a)(2),(3) or § 1.1474-2(a)(3), (4) of this chapter). In addition, no claim for refund or credit may be made by a taxpayer for any amount that has been repaid to a qualified intermediary (as described in § 1.1441-1(e)(5)(ii)) or a participating FFI (as described in § 1.1471-1(b)(91)) pursuant to a collective refund filed by such entity on behalf of the taxpayer. See § 1.1441-1(e)(5)(iii) (describing a qualified intermediary agreement) and § 1.1471-4(h) (describing a collective refund). Upon request, a taxpayer must also submit such documentation as the IRS, may require establishing that the taxpayer is the beneficial owner of the income for which a claim for refund or credit is being made and verifying the grounds and facts set forth in taxpayer's claim as required by § 301.6402-2(b)(1). See § 1.1474-5 for additional requirements that may apply in the case of a refund of tax withheld under chapter 4.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-3(f)Effective/applicability date—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (f)(2) of this section, this section applies on or after January 6, 2017.
Effective/applicability date—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (f)(2) of this section, this section applies on or after January 6, 2017. (For payments made after June 30, 2014, and before January 6, 2017, see this section as in effect and contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2016.)
(2) References in paragraph (e) of this section to Form 8805 or other statements required under § 1.1446-3(d)(2) shall apply to partnership taxable years beginning after April 29, 2008. References in paragraph (e) of this section to amounts withheld under chapter 4 of the Code and claims made with respect to amounts withheld under chapter 4 of the Code shall apply to withholdable payments made after June 30, 2014.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-3(i)§301.6402-3(i)
First, any outstanding liability for any tax (or for any interest, additional amount, additions to the tax, or assessable penalty) owed by the taxpayer making the overpayment;
(ii) Second, in the case of an individual taxpayer, amounts of past-due support assigned to a State under section 402(a)(26) or 471(a)(17) of the Social Security Act under procedures set forth in the regulations under section 6402(c);
(iii) Third, past-due and legally enforceable debt under procedures set forth in the regulations under section 6402(d); and
(iv) Fourth, qualifying amounts of past-due support not assigned to a State under procedures set forth in the regulations under section 6402 (c).
Only the balance, if any, of the overpayment remaining after credits described in this paragraph (a)(6) shall be treated in the manner so elected.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-4Payments in excess of amounts shown on return
(a) If the IRS determines that the payments by the taxpayer that are made within the period prescribed for payment and before the filing of the return exceed the amount of tax shown on the return (for example, excessive estimated income tax payments or excessive withholding), the IRS may credit or refund such overpayment without awaiting examination of the completed return and without awaiting the filing of a claim for refund. The provisions of §§ 301.6402-2 and 301.6402-3 are applicable to such overpayment, and taxpayers should submit claims for refund (if the income tax return is not itself a claim for refund, as provided in § 301.6402-3) to protect themselves in the event the IRS fails to make such determination and credit or refund. The provisions of section 6405 (relating to reports of refunds in excess of the statutorily prescribed threshold referral amount to the Joint Committee on Taxation) do not apply to the overpayments described in this section.
(b) Effective/applicability date. The rules of this section apply to payments made on or after July 24, 2015.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-4(a)If the IRS determines that the payments by the taxpayer that are made within the period prescribed for payment and before the filing of the return exceed the amount of tax shown on the return (for example, excessive estimated income tax payments or excessive withholding), the IRS may credit or refund such overpayment without awaiting examination of the completed return and without awaiting the filing of a claim for refund.
If the IRS determines that the payments by the taxpayer that are made within the period prescribed for payment and before the filing of the return exceed the amount of tax shown on the return (for example, excessive estimated income tax payments or excessive withholding), the IRS may credit or refund such overpayment without awaiting examination of the completed return and without awaiting the filing of a claim for refund. The provisions of §§ 301.6402-2 and 301.6402-3 are applicable to such overpayment, and taxpayers should submit claims for refund (if the income tax return is not itself a claim for refund, as provided in § 301.6402-3) to protect themselves in the event the IRS fails to make such determination and credit or refund. The provisions of section 6405 (relating to reports of refunds in excess of the statutorily prescribed threshold referral amount to the Joint Committee on Taxation) do not apply to the overpayments described in this section.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-4(b)Effective/applicability date.
Effective/applicability date. The rules of this section apply to payments made on or after July 24, 2015.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-5Offset of past-due support against overpayment
(a) Introduction—(1) Scope. Section 6402(c) requires the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate to reduce the amount of any overpayment to be refunded to a person making an overpayment by the amount of past-due support owed by that person of which the Secretary has been notified in accordance with section 464 of the Social Security Act. Past-due support shall be collected by offset under section 6402(c) and this section in the same manner as if it were a liability for tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (except that a liability for tax shall be given priority with respect to offset arising under section 6402(a)). Collection by offset under section 6402(c) of this section is a collection procedure separate from the collection procedures provided by section 6305 and § 301.6305-1, relating to assessment and collection of certain child and spousal support liabilities. The sole collection procedure provided by section 6402(c) and this section is that of offset against overpayment. Section 6305 and § 301.6305-1, by contrast, provide for other collection procedures in addition to collection by offset against overpayment. Sections 6305 and 6402(c) have differing procedural requirements and may be used separately or in conjunction with each other.
(2) General rule. An amount of past-due support qualifies for offset under this section if it satisfies the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. A State shall submit to the Department of Health and Human Services a notification of liability for qualifying past-due support containing the information described in paragraph (c) of this section. A qualifying amount of past-due support owed by a taxpayer who has made an overpayment shall be collected in accordance with the procedures set forth in paragraph (d) of this section. Under paragraph (d), the balance of any overpayment remaining after crediting of the overpayment under section 6402(a) to any liability for an internal revenue tax on the part of the taxpayer shall be offset by the amount of past-due support of which the Internal Revenue Service has been notified. The amount of the overpayment not subject to offset for any liability for an internal revenue tax or for past-due support shall be promptly refunded to the taxpayer. Paragraph (e) of this section requires that the Internal Revenue Service notify the taxpayer of the amount of the offset and of the State to which it has been paid. Under procedures set forth in paragraph (f) of this section, amounts collected by offset shall be transferred to a special account maintained by the Bureau of Government Financial Operations for distribution to the States. The Internal Revenue Service shall make monthly collection reports to the Secretary of Health and Human Services or his delegate. The States shall reimburse the Secretary of the Treasury for the full cost of the refund offset under paragraph (g) of this section.
(b) Past-due support—(1) Definition. For purposes of this section, the term “past-due support” means the amount of a delinquent obligation, which amount was determined under a court order, or an order pursuant to an administrative process established under State law, for support and maintenance of a child or of a child and the parent with whom the child is living.
(2) Past-due support qualifying for offset. Past-due support qualifies for offset under section 6402(c) and this section if—
(i) There has been as assignment of the support obligation to a State pursuant to section 402(a)(26) of the Social Security Act (relating to aid and service to needy families with children) and that State has made reasonable efforts to collect the amount of the obligation;
(ii) The amount of past-due support is not less than $150.00;
(iii) The past-due support has been delinquent for three months or longer; and
(iv) A notification of liability for past-due support has been received by the Secretary of the Treasury as prescribed by paragraph (c) of this section.
(c) Notification of liability for past-due support—(1) Form. A State shall, by October 1 of each year, submit a notification (or notifications) of liability for past-due support on magnetic tape to the Special Collection Activities Unit.
Office of Child Support Enforcement, Department of Health and Human Services, 6110 Executive Boulevard, Suite 900, Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention: Tax Refund Offset—Tape Processing.
(2) Content. The notification of liability for past-due support shall contain with respect to each taxpayer—
(i) The name of the taxpayer who owes the past-due support;
(ii) The social security number of that taxpayer;
(iii) The amount of past-due support owed; and
(iv) The alphabetical designation of the State submitting the notification of liability for past-due support.
The Secretary of Health and Human Services may also require such other information from the State submitting the notification as is necessary for his orderly consolidation of data for transmittal to the Internal Revenue Service.
(3) Transmittal of notification to Internal Revenue Service. The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall, by December 1 of each year, consolidate and transmit to the Internal Revenue Service on magnetic tape the data contained in the notifications of liability for past-due support submitted by the participating States.
(4) Correction of notification. If, after submitting a notification of liability for past-due support, a State determines that an error has been made with respect to the information contained in the notification, or if a State receives a payment or credits a payment to the account of a taxpayer named in this notification, the State shall promptly notify the Office of Child Support Enforcement of the Department of Health and Human Services of these corrections in accordance with any time limitations specified by the Office of Child Support Enforcement. That Office shall promptly transmit these corrections to the Internal Revenue Service and the Internal Revenue Service shall make the appropriate correction of the notification of liability for past-due support. However, in no case shall a State notify the Internal Revenue Service under this paragraph (c)(4) of an increased amount of past-due support owed by a taxpayer named in its notification of liability for past-due support. The correction notification described in this paragraph (c)(4) is to be submitted only for the purpose of completing or correcting the information contained in the notification of liability for past-due support.
(d) Collection—(1) Priority of offset for outstanding tax liability. Under section 6402(a) and § 301.6402-1, the Commissioner may credit any overpayment of tax against any outstanding liability for any tax owed by the person making the overpayment. Only the balance remaining after such crediting is available for offset under section 6402(c) of this section. Thus, if a taxpayer making an overpayment has both an outstanding tax liability and a liability for past-due support subject to this section, then the entire amount of the overpayment shall be credited first against the outstanding tax liability under section 6402(a) and § 301.6402-1 and only the remainder, if any, of the overpayment will be offset by the amount of past-due support. However, an overpayment shall be offset by an amount of past-due support under section 6402(c) before any crediting of the overpayment to any future liability for an internal revenue tax. Thus, for example, if no outstanding tax liability is owed and the amount of an overpayment is equal to or less than the amount of past-due support, the Internal Revenue Service shall offset the overpayment by the amount of past-due support before crediting the overpayment against the taxpayer's estimated income tax for the succeeding taxable year under section 6402(b).
(2) Amounts subject to offset. The balance of any overpayment remaining after a crediting of the overpayment under section 6402(a) to any outstanding liability for tax on the part of the taxpayer shall be offset by the amount of past-due support of which the Internal Revenue Service has been notified under this section.
(3) Amounts not subject to offset. The amount of an overpayment not subject to offset for any liability for tax or for past-due support shall be promptly refunded to the taxpayer.
(e) Notice of offset. The Internal Revenue Service shall notify the taxpayer in writing of the amount and date of the offset for past-due support and of the State to which this amount of past-due support has been paid.
(f) Disposition of amounts collected. Amounts collected under this section shall be transferred to a special account maintained by the Bureau of Government Financial Operations. The Internal Revenue Service shall advise the Secretary of Health and Human Services or his delegate on a monthly basis of the names and social security numbers of the taxpayers from whom the amounts of past-due support were collected, of the amounts collected from each taxpayer, and of the State on whose behalf each collection was made. After authorization by the Division of Finance of the Social Security Administration, the Bureau of Government Financial Operations of the Department of the Treasury shall pay to the participating States amounts equal to the amounts collected under this section.
(g) Fee. A refund offset fee in the amount of $17.00 per offset for taxable year 1981, or such greater or smaller amount as the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Health and Human Services have agreed to be sufficient to reimburse the Internal Revenue Service for the full cost of the offset procedure, shall be billed and collected from the participating States by the Secretary of Health and Human Services or his delegate and deposited in the United States Treasury and credited to the appropriation accounts of the Internal Revenue Service which bore all or part of the costs involved in making the collection.
(h) Effective dates. This section applies to refunds payable on or before January 1, 1999. For the rules applicable after January 1, 1999, see 31 CFR part 285.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-5(a)Introduction—(1) Scope.
Introduction—(1) Scope. Section 6402(c) requires the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate to reduce the amount of any overpayment to be refunded to a person making an overpayment by the amount of past-due support owed by that person of which the Secretary has been notified in accordance with section 464 of the Social Security Act. Past-due support shall be collected by offset under section 6402(c) and this section in the same manner as if it were a liability for tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (except that a liability for tax shall be given priority with respect to offset arising under section 6402(a)). Collection by offset under section 6402(c) of this section is a collection procedure separate from the collection procedures provided by section 6305 and § 301.6305-1, relating to assessment and collection of certain child and spousal support liabilities. The sole collection procedure provided by section 6402(c) and this section is that of offset against overpayment. Section 6305 and § 301.6305-1, by contrast, provide for other collection procedures in addition to collection by offset against overpayment. Sections 6305 and 6402(c) have differing procedural requirements and may be used separately or in conjunction with each other.
(2) General rule. An amount of past-due support qualifies for offset under this section if it satisfies the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. A State shall submit to the Department of Health and Human Services a notification of liability for qualifying past-due support containing the information described in paragraph (c) of this section. A qualifying amount of past-due support owed by a taxpayer who has made an overpayment shall be collected in accordance with the procedures set forth in paragraph (d) of this section. Under paragraph (d), the balance of any overpayment remaining after crediting of the overpayment under section 6402(a) to any liability for an internal revenue tax on the part of the taxpayer shall be offset by the amount of past-due support of which the Internal Revenue Service has been notified. The amount of the overpayment not subject to offset for any liability for an internal revenue tax or for past-due support shall be promptly refunded to the taxpayer. Paragraph (e) of this section requires that the Internal Revenue Service notify the taxpayer of the amount of the offset and of the State to which it has been paid. Under procedures set forth in paragraph (f) of this section, amounts collected by offset shall be transferred to a special account maintained by the Bureau of Government Financial Operations for distribution to the States. The Internal Revenue Service shall make monthly collection reports to the Secretary of Health and Human Services or his delegate. The States shall reimburse the Secretary of the Treasury for the full cost of the refund offset under paragraph (g) of this section.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-5(b)Past-due support—(1) Definition.
Past-due support—(1) Definition. For purposes of this section, the term “past-due support” means the amount of a delinquent obligation, which amount was determined under a court order, or an order pursuant to an administrative process established under State law, for support and maintenance of a child or of a child and the parent with whom the child is living.
(2) Past-due support qualifying for offset. Past-due support qualifies for offset under section 6402(c) and this section if—
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6402-5(c)Notification of liability for past-due support—(1) Form.
Notification of liability for past-due support—(1) Form. A State shall, by October 1 of each year, submit a notification (or notifications) of liability for past-due support on magnetic tape to the Special Collection Activities Unit.
Office of Child Support Enforcement, Department of Health and Human Services, 6110 Executive Boulevard, Suite 900, Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention: Tax Refund Offset—Tape Processing.
(2) Content. The notification of liability for past-due support shall contain with respect to each taxpayer—
124 Citing Cases
Injured spouse relief “involves obtaining a refund of a spouse’s interest in an overpayment that has been offset pursuant to § 6402.” Lawrence A.
Moreover, an offset under section 6402 is not a collection action that is subject to review in this section 6330 proceeding.
However, pursuant to section 6402(a), on April 15, 2015, the IRS applied that overpayment to reduce their 2010 tax liability.
With the application of overpayment credits applied for the years at issue from tax years 2016, 2019, 2020, and 2021 pursuant to section 6402, an outstanding self-reported liability remains for each of the years at issue.
Discussion Pursuant to section 6402, in the event of an overpayment, a taxpayer may recoup the balance of the overpayment--less any outstanding liabilities--in the form of a credit or a refund.
Shitrit nonetheless argues that section 6512 grants us jurisdiction to determine an overpayment and that section 6402 equips us with the power to order a refund of that overpayment.
Turner pursuant to section 6402 and section 1.6654-2(e)(5)(ii), Income Tax Regs.) does not constitute - 14 - misappropriation of funds; (d) she filed an individual return and did not establish how any prior abuse by Mr.
(CCH) 737, 738-739 ("An offset under section 6402 is distinguishable from, and does not constitute, a levy ac- tion.").
Court ofAppeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the Court's holding that since we had not addressed the underpayment of interest, the Commissioner had authority pursuant to section 6402 to reduce the overpayment oftax that we had determined by the amount ofunpaid interest.
Respondent contends that section 6402 provides the Commissioner with authorityto apply overpayment to any outstanding tax liability.
Respondent did not refund the $711 to petitioner, but on that same date, pursuant to section 6402(a), he credited $711 as an offset against petitioner's unpaid 2011 tax liability.
sonal exemption for his wife for tax year 2008. III. Overpayment Under section 6402(a) the IRS is authorized to credit a taxpayer's overpayment against his tax liabilities. We do not havejurisdiction to restrain or review any credit by the IRS under section 6402. Sec. 6512(b)(4); Bocock v. Commissioner, 127 T.C. 178 (2006). We do, however, havejurisdiction to determine whether a taxpayerhas made an overpayment oftax and in what amount. Sec. 6512(b)(1). To determine whether there is an overpaymen
Section 6402 allows the Internal Revenue Service to credit an overpayment to "the person who made the overpayment". In the case ofmarried taxpayers filingjointly, "ajoint income tax return does not create new property interests for the husband or the wife in each other's income tax overpayment. * * * [T]he * * * [spouse] having paid the entire amou
We disagree with the premise ofpetitioners' argument.
a refund claim (generally 3 years after he or she has filed the 8The Internal Revenue Service has defined "collection activities" as the issuance of"a section 6330 notice; an offset ofan overpayment ofthe requesting spouse against a liability under section 6402; the filing ofa suit by the United States against the requesting spouse for the collection ofthejoint tax liability; or the filing ofa claim by the United States in a court proceeding in which the requesting spouse is a party or which inv
It is well-established law that interest is generally taxable as income to the recipient, including interest resulting from a tax refund. See secs. 61(a)(4), 861(a)(1), 871(a)(1)(A); sec. 1.61- 7(a), Income Tax Regs.; see also, e.g., Muir v. Commissioner, B.T.A.M. (P-H) para. 32, 328, at 32-35 (1932) ("[T]he interest upon the over-paymen
at 17; see also Rev.
2003-61, supra, that a petitioning spouse make a "separate payment" or "provide the funds" used to pay thejoint tax liability in order to be entitled to a refund under section 6015(g)(1), is in accord with section 6402, which requires, inter alia, that in order to obtain a refund, a person must make an overpayment.
arising from an overpayment to any tax liability then due arising under the Internal Revenue Code for the same taxpayer. Under section 6512(b)(4), this Court lacksjurisdiction to restrain or review any credit or refund made by the Commissioner under section 6402. See Savage v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 46, 48-49 (1999); Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. 291, 293-294 (1998); Steinberg v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-311, aff'd, 19 Fed. Appx. 498 (9th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, we lack
We concluded that the IRS had followed all appropriate procedures in filing the notice oftax lien, and we specifically rejected petitioner's argumentthatthe IRS had "improperly offset his income tax refund for tax year 2004 against his outstanding tax liability for tax -4- [*4] year 1991." As we explained; section 6402 ofthe Code explicitly authorizes the IRS "to credit an overpaymentto offset an outstanding income tax liability." Golub II, at 7.
2003-61, supra, that a petitioning spouse make a "separate payment" or "provide the funds" used to pay thejoint tax liability in order to be entitled to a refund under section 6015(g)(1), is in accord with section 6402, which requires, inter alia, that in order to obtain a refund, a person must make an overpayment.
For the reasons explained below, we hold that a portion ofthe account did indeed constitute separate funds ofMs.
§ 6402, gives the IRS the discretionary authority to credit tax overpayments to any tax liability. See N. States Power Co. v. United States, 73 F.3d 764, 766-67 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 862, 117 S. Ct. 168, 136 L. Ed. 2d 110 (1996); In re Ryan, 64 F.3d 1516, 1523-24 (11th Cir. 1995) (holding that 26 U.S.C. § 6402 gives the IRS the discret
1996) (quoting Ryan, 64 F.3d at 1523 ("'[Section 6402], plainly gives the IRS the discretion to apply overpayments to any tax liability.'")); Pettibone Corp.
Tlje Court held:tlie case was moot and noted that^an òffsiét urider section 6402 doés dot constitute a levy action and accordingly is not a collection action subjectto review in a section 6330 proceeding.
ndent. See Rule 142(a). Our conclusions, however, are based on a preponderance ofthe evidence, and thus the allocation ofthe burden ofproofis immaterial. See Martin Ice Cream Co. v. Commissioner, 110 T C. 189, 210 n.16 (1998). - 5 - made pursuantto section 6402. Thus, as we have previously held, we.do not have jurisdiction to review an application ofan overpaymentto a prior year. Savage v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 46.(1999). In;addition, after the application ofan overpayment,.the Commissioner is
Section 6402 makes this expressly clear, stating: SEC. 6402(a). GENERAL Rule. — In the case of any overpayment, the Secretary, within the applicable period of limitations, may credit the amount of such overpayment, including any interest allowed thereon, against any liability in respect to an internal revenue tax on the part of the person who made
ers' collection matters in this deficiency proceeding. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent in the amount of the agreed deficiency. 4We note, however, that sec. 301.6402-3 (a) (6) , Proced. & Admin. Regs., in accord with sec. 6402, authorizes the Commissioner to override a taxpayer' s instructions to apply overpayments or credits and to apply them against "any outstanding liability for any tax" . Accordingly, it is questionable whether petitioners would be successful
3301(b) also added section 6601(f) to clarify the offset provision of section 6402. Section 6601(f) provides: SEC. 6601(f). Satisfaction by Credits.--If any portion of a tax is satisfied by credit of an overpayment, then no interest shall be imposed.under this section on the portion of the tax so satisfied for any period during which, if the credit had not been made, interest would have been allowable with respect to such overpayment. The preceding sentence shall not apply to the extent that sec
Therefore, if a taxpayer owed the Government an underpayment and the Government, in turn, owed the taxpayer an overpayment in an equivalent amount, the amounts could be offset pursuant to section 6402 and no interest would be paid by either party.
The Court held the case was moot and noted that an offset under section 6402 does not constitute a levy action and accordingly is not a collection action subject to review in a section 6330 proceeding .
296, 300 (2005) ("A levy is distinguishable from an offset."), affd. 451 F.3d 8 (1st Cir. 2006); Bullock v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-5 ("An offset under section 6402 is distinguishable from,.and does not constitute, a levy action."); Trent v.
However, respondent credited the overpayment against-petitioner's outstanding 'Federal income tax liability for 2001 pursuant to the section 6402 setoff procedures .
6402 (West 2003) . Moreover, an employee .cannot be discharged for refusing to perform work which would result in a violation of the California Labor Code and where the violation would create a real an d apparent hazard to that employee or to fellow employees . Cal . Lab . Code-sec. 6311 (West 2003) . Petitioner did have tort-based claims agai
We hold that petitioner's argument with respect to respondent's application of credits from the 2004 .and 2005 overpayments to 1997 instead of 1996, raised in her objection to respondent's motion, is without merit .
We hold that petitioner's argument with respect to respondent's application of credits from the 2004 .and 2005 overpayments to 1997 instead of 1996, raised in her objection to respondent's motion, is without merit .
Pursuant to section 6512(b)(4), the Court lacks jurisdiction in a deficiency case such as this to review a credit made by the Commissioner under section 6402(a).9 See also Ryals v. Commissioner, 127 T.C. 178, 182 (2006); Savage v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 46 (1999). Section 6512(b)(4) does not apply to this case because we do not find in the limited record before us that respondent, in most recently recharacterizing the disputed funds as the payment of income tax rather than estate tax, was credit
4) does not apply to this case because we do not find in the limited record before us that respondent, in most recently recharacterizing the disputed funds as the payment of income tax rather than estate tax, was crediting an overpayment pursuant to section 6402. Nor does section 6512(b)(4) deprive the Court of jurisdiction in essence to review the reversal of the overpayment credit made by respondent in the first place; i.e., respondent had credited to the estate’s estate tax the disputed funds
Section 6402 allows the IRS to credit an "overpayment, including any interest allowed thereon, against any liability in respect of an .internal revenue tax on the part of the person who - 11 - made the overpayment" and, subject to certain limitations, to refund any balance to the person . In lieu of a refund, a taxpayer can instruct the IRS to cre
of any refund or credit to which the individual is entitled may depend upon other issues arising outside the scope of section 6015, such as whether the overpayment should be reduced by various offsets that the Secretary is authorized to make under section 6402. Accordingly, inasmuch as there can be no determination as to whether an individual is entitled to a refund or credit unless there is first a determination whether the individual has an overpayment, and inasmuch as it cannot be determined
The United States moved to dismiss on the ground that as a matter of law petitioner has no claim for a 1999 overpayment because the credit against the 1999 tax year no longer exists, having been applied against petitioner's outstanding 1992 tax liability pursuant to section 6402(a).
t of any refund or credit to which the individual is entitled may depend upon other issues arising outside the scope of section 6015, such as whether the overpayment should be reduced by various offsets that the Secretary is authorized to make under section 6402. Accordingly, inasmuch as there can be no determination as to whether an individual is entitled to á refund or credit unless there is first a determination whether the individual has an overpayment, and inasmuch as it cannot be determine
The issue for decision is whether the Court has jurisdiction to consider petitioners’ arguments that respondent, under section 6402, incorrectly applied an overpayment of petitioners’ 2001 Federal income taxes toward payment of an indebtedness owing by petitioner John Wolfgram (Mr.
However, the Treasury regulations promulgated under section 6402(a) demonstrate that the IRS does not apply the voluntary payment rule to overpayments.
made during the pendency of proceedings for the refund of a divisible tax (e.g., any employment tax). In pertinent part, section 6331(i)(3) (B) provides: "Certain levies. This subsection shall not apply to- -(i) any levy to carry out an offset under section 6402". By reference to the language of section 6331(i)(3)(B), a similar exception·is incorporated into section 6331(k), which (cid:16)04p2rovides that no levy may be made while an offer in compromise is pending or an installment agreement is
etitioner that she was not required to file an income tax return; (4) courts have held that a Form 1040 with zeros in all boxes for income qualified as a tax return; (5) petitioner's 1996 income tax return constitutes a claim for refund pursuant to section 6402; (6) petitioner had zero income in 1996; (7) no statute requires petitioner to make a self-assessment; (8) petitioner's return is not frivolous and is not designed to delay or impede the administration of Federal income tax laws; (9) no I
of $657 against petitioner’s income tax liability for 1988. On April 15, 2000, respondent offset petitioner’s income tax refund for 1999 in the amount of $872 against petitioner’s income tax liability for 1988. 2 Respondent concedes that, subject to sec. 6402, he will refund petitioner $753 and $300 related to her 2000 tax year that respondent offset against petitioner’s tax liability for 1988 on Mar. 12, 2001, and Sept. 17, 2001, respectively. Respondent based this concession on his administrat
Most of the overpayments underlying petitioner’s claims for additional overpayment interest are interim overpayments that respondent credited against a tax liability of petitioner for a different year and/or a different tax, pursuant to section 6402(a).
0), and a Las Vegas bankruptcy court held that “Zeroes entered on a Form 1040 constitutes a return.” Cross v. U.S., 91-2 USTC p. 50,318, Banker. L. Rep p. 7404. 5) Please note that my 1996 return also constitutes a claim for refund pursuant to Code Section 6402. - 6 - 6) It should also be noted that I had “zero” income according to the Supreme Court’s definition of income (See Note #1) * * * since I had no earnings in 1996, that would have been taxable as “income” under the Corporation Excise Ta
6402, I.R.C., to outstanding tax liabilities of the taxpayer who overpaid, does not apply where our final decision in the same case precludes the existence of the liabilities to which the Commissioner applied the overpayment.
an income tax return; * * * * * * * 7) It should also be noted that I had “zero” income according to the Supreme Court’s definition of income (See note #1) * * * 8) Please note that my 1997 return also constitutes a claim for refund pursuant to Code Section 6402. 9) I am also putting the I.R.S. on notice that my 1997 tax return and claim for refund does not constitute a “frivolous” return pursuant to Code section 6702. * * * 11) In addition, don’t notify me that the I.R.S. is “changing” my retur
(defining an offset of an overpayment against a liability pursuant to section 6402 as a 3 We note that petitioner does not question the validity of Rev.
Section 6402 allows the Secretary to credit the amount of an overpayment against any liability in respect of an internal revenue tax on the part of the person who made the overpayment. Such offset does not preclude the Internal Revenue Service from making a later determination or assessment with regard to the overpayment year. Owens v. Commissioner
pondent alleges that $85,336.83 in underpayment interest remained unpaid. Respondent states that he subtracted this amount from the $238,847.24 overpayment that we determined, and he applied the $85,336.83 to assessed but unpaid interest pursuant to section 6402. This resulted in the May 13, 2002, refund of $210,467.35, which consisted of $153,510.41 ($238,847.24 minus $85,336.83) plus interest on the $153,510.41. Respondent argues that pursuant to section 6402(a) he is entitled to credit part o
Furthermore, respondent argues that section 6512(b)(4), which provides that the Court has no jurisdiction “to restrain or review any credit or reduction made by the Secretary under section 6402”, deprives the Court of jurisdiction to consider claims for overpayment interest with respect to over-payments that were credited to a taxpayer’s liabilities before the taxpayer filed a petition in this Court.
- 3 - Background On May 13, 1999, respondent applied, pursuant to section 6402(a), petitioner’s overpayment, relating to 1998, as a credit against a portion of petitioner’s 1989 tax liability and sent petitioner written notification thereof.
In this regard, we observe that the October 21, 2002, notice of determination did not sustain respondent’s proposed levy action because, as of the date of the notice, petitioner’s tax liabilities for the years in issue had been fully paid, principally through the application of setoffs made pursuant to section 6402(a).
This, the Court explained, was because it lacked jurisdiction to restrain or review any credit or reduction by the Commissioner under section 6402 (citing section 6512(b)(4) and Savage v.
liable” for. Since no Code Section makes me “liable” for income taxes, this provision notifies me that I do not have to file an income tax return. * * * * * * * 5) Please note, that my 1998 return also constitutes a claim for refund pursuant to Code Section 6402. 6) It should also be noted that I had “zero” income according to the Supreme Court’s definition of income (See Note #1) * * * . 7) I am also putting the IRS on notice that my 1998 tax return and claim for refund does not constitute a “f
iability for another taxable year does not constitute a collection action that is subject to review under sections 6320 or 6330. In particular, the Commissioner’s authority to credit an overpayment to offset any taxpayer’s liability is set forth in section 6402. An offset under section 6402 is distinguishable from, and does not constitute, a levy action. See Belloff v. Commissioner, 996 F.2d 607, 615-616 (2d Cir. 1993) (comparing a levy with a “setoff”); Karara v. United States, 90 AFTR 2d 2002-
ourt Rules of Practice and Procedure. On July 18, 2002, the Commissioner published final regulations, pursuant to sec. 6015, that define a collection activity to include “an offset of an overpayment of the requesting spouse against a liability under section 6402”. Sec. 1.6015-5(b)(2)(i), Income Tax Regs. These regulations are applicable to all requests for relief from joint and several liability filed on or after July 18, 2002, and, thus, not applicable to petitioner’s request, which was filed b
After concessions by the parties, the sole issue for decision is whether, under section 6402, respondent properly credited a payment by petitioners to their 1996 tax year instead of 1997 as contended by petitioners.2 Some of the facts were stipulated.
iable” for. Since no Code Section makes me “liable” for income taxes, this provision notifies me that I do not have to file an income tax return. * * * * * * * 7) Please note, that my 1997 return also constitutes a claim for refund pursuant to Code Section 6402. 8) It should also be noted that I had “zero” income according to the Supreme Court’s definition of income * * *. 9) I am also putting the IRS on notice that my 1997 tax return and claim for refund does not constitute a “frivolous” return
ay be "liable" for. Since no Code Section makes me "liable" for income taxes, this provision notifies me that I do not. . have tò file an incòme tak réturn.. 6) Please note, that my 1991 return also constitutes a . claim for refund pursuant to Code Section 6402. 7) It should also be noted that I had "zero" income according to the Supreme Court's definition of income * * * 8) I am also putting the IRS on notice that my 1921 tax return and claim for refund does not constitute a "frivolous" return
ve to file an income tax return; * * * * * * * 7) It should also be noted that I had “zero” income according to The Supreme Court’s definition of income * * * . 8) Please note that my 1997 return also constitutes a claim for refund pursuant to Code Section 6402. 9) I am also putting the IRS on notice that my 1997 tax return and claim or [sic] refund does not constitute a “frivolous” return pursuant to Code Section 6702. * * * * * * * * * * 11) In addition, don’t notify me [t]hat the IRS is “chan
liable” for. Since no Code Section makes me “liable” for income taxes, this provision notifies me that I do not have to file an income tax return. * * * * * * * 6) Please note, that my 1997 return also constitutes a claim for refund pursuant to Code Section 6402. 7) It should also be noted that I had “zero” income ACCORDING TO THE SUPREME COURT’S DEFINITION OF INCOME * * * . 8) With this statement, I am also putting the IRS on notice that my 1997 tax return and claim for refund does not constitu
liable” for. Since no Code Section makes me “liable” for income taxes, this provision notifies me that I do not have to file an income tax return. * * * * * * * 6) Please note, that my 1997 return also constitutes a claim for refund pursuant to Code Section 6402. 7) It should also be noted that I had “zero” income according to the Supreme Court’s definition of income * * * . 8) I am also putting the IRS on notice that my 1997 tax return and claim for refund does not constitute a - 4 - “frivolous
liable” for. Since no Code Section makes me “liable” for income taxes, this provision notifies me that I do not have to file an income tax return; * * * * * * * 5) Please note, that my 1998 return also constitutes a claim for refund pursuant to Code Section 6402. 6) It should also be noted that I had “zero” income according to the Supreme Court’s definition of income * * * . 7) I am also putting the IRS on notice that my 1998 tax return and claim for refund does not constitute a “frivolous” retu
be liable for. Since no Code Section makes me liable for income taxes, this provision notifies me that I do not have to file an income tax return. * * * * * * * 6) Please note that my 1997 return also constitutes a claim for refund pursuant to Code Section 6402. 7) It should also be noted that I had “zero” income according to the Supreme Court’s definition of income * * * 8) I am also putting the IRS on notice that my 1997 tax return and claim for refund does not constitute a “frivolous” return
liable” for. Since no Code Section makes me “liable” for income taxes, this provision notifies me that I do not have to file an income tax return. * * * * * * * 5) Please note, that my 1995 return also constitutes a claim for refund pursuant to Code Section 6402. 6) It should also be noted that I had “zero” income according to the Supreme Court’s definition of income (See Note #1) * * * . 7) I am also putting the IRS on notice that my 1995 tax return and claim for refund does not constitute a “f
liable” for. Since no Code Section makes me “liable” for income taxes, this provision notifies me that I do not have to file an income tax return; * * * * * * * 6) Please note, that my 1997 return also constitutes a claim for refund pursuant to Code Section 6402. 7) It should also be noted that I had “zero” income according to the Supreme Court’s definition of income (See Note #1) * * * . 8) I am also putting the IRS on notice that my 1997 tax return and claim for refund does not constitute a “f
Section 6402 and the regulations thereunder govern respondent’s authority to credit income tax overpayments against the estimated income tax for the succeeding taxable year. Respondent’s authority to do so is specifically limited to allowing credits of overpayments for which a claim has been filed within the applicable period of limitations. See se
(to - 13 - call an offset a “taking tantamount to a levy is disingenuous”); cf. sec. 301.6330-1(g)(2) Q&A-G3, Proced. & Admin. Regs. Respondent properly offset petitioner’s 1994 tax liability by crediting refunds from other years in accordance with section 6402. We hold that respondent did not engage in collection activity in violation of section 6015(e)(1)(B). To take account of respondent’s concession, An appropriate order will be issued.
o the extent that petitioner may be seeking to invoke the overpayment jurisdiction of this Court, see sec. 6512(b), it is clear that we have no jurisdiction under that section to restrain or review any credit or reduction made by the Secretary under section 6402. See sec. 6512(b)(4); see also sec. 6402(e), which bars any court of the United States, including this Court, from hearing any action that is commenced to restrain or review a reduction authorized by section 6402(c);7 Columbus v. Commiss
In this regard, the Installment Agreement expressly authorizes respondent to apply any refund that might otherwise be payable to any outstanding liability covered by the agreement. Here, petitioner made payments pursuant to the Installment Agreement in 1997 that respondent properly treated as payments of estimated tax for 1997. Petitione
In so holding, we are mindful of section 6512(b)(4), which serves to deny jurisdiction to the Court "to restrain or review any credit or reduction made by the Secretary under section 6402." Savage v.
turns was remitted by respondent to the Mississippi Department of Human Services, under section 6402(c), to offset petitioner’s past due support obligations. At trial, petitioner challenged respondent’s authority to remit such amounts; however, this Court has no authority to restrain or review any credit or reduction made by the Commissioner under section 6402. See sec. 6512(b)(4); Savage v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 46 (1999). Decision will be entered for respondent.
pply any or all of petitioner’s refunds solely against petitioner’s liabilities for the years in issue. Further, pursuant to section 6512(b)(4), this Court is restricted from restraining or reviewing any credit or reduction made by respondent under section 6402. See Savage v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 46 (1999). Therefore, we are without jurisdiction to decide whether respondent improperly credited any overpayments to petitioner’s tax liabilities for years not before the Court. See id. Finally, pet
Unlike Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra, to the extent petitioner reported an overpayment, respondent exercised his discretion under section 6402 to offset such overpayment against petitioner's assessed liabilities for 1990 and 1991.
Under section 6402, the Commissioner is expressly authorized to credit the amount of an overpayment against any tax liability of the taxpayer. See sec. 6402(a). Section 6512(b) generally defines this Court's jurisdiction to determine overpayments. Paragraph (4) of that section serves to deny jurisdiction to this Court "to restrain or review any credit or
- 7 - review any credit or reduction made by the Secretary under section 6402."4 Respondent contends that pursuant to section 6512(b)(4) this Court has no jurisdiction to review the action with regard to the application of the overpayments.
as an offset against the agreed deficiency for 1993. We hold, however, that we lack jurisdiction in this proceeding to review respondent’s assessment of petitioner’s liabilities for interest and penalties for 1990 and 1991. Our analysis begins with section 6402. Under the general rule of that section, the Commissioner is expressly authorized to credit the amount of an overpayment against any tax liability of the taxpayer. Sec. 6402(a). However, after applying an overpayment against the taxpayer’
First, we may not restrain or prevent respondent from reducing a refund by way of credit or reduction pursuant to section 6402.
perjury under both 18 U.S.C. 1621 and U.S.C. 7206. Thus, not wishing to commit perjury under either statute, I can only swear to have "zero" income for 1992. 7. Please note that my 1992 return also con-stitutes a claim for refund pursuant to IRCode § 6402. 8. I am also putting IRS on notice that my corrected 1992 tax return and claim for refund does not constitute a "frivolous" return pursuant to IRCode § 6702. My amended return and claim for refund is based on 9 court decisions, 9 Internal Reve
Thus, to the extent petitioners may contend that they are entitled to some - 5 - portion of the $475 overpayment because section 6402 was not applied correctly by respondent, they have not met their burden of proof.
Section 6402 provides: In the case of any overpayment, the Secretary, within the applicable period of limitations, may credit the amount of such overpayment, including any interest allowed thereon, against any liability in respect of an internal revenue tax on the part of the person who made the overpayment and shall, subject to subsections (c) -
First of all, section 6402 gives respondent the authority to credit the amount of an overpayment, including any interest allowed thereon, against any liability with respect to Internal Revenue tax on the part of the person who made the overpayment.