§6531 — Periods of limitation on criminal prosecutions

47 cases·7 followed·4 distinguished·1 criticized·5 overruled·30 cited15% support

No person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for any of the various offenses arising under the internal revenue laws unless the indictment is found or the information instituted within 3 years next after the commission of the offense, except that the period of limitation shall be 6 years—

(1)

for offenses involving the defrauding or attempting to defraud the United States or any agency thereof, whether by conspiracy or not, and in any manner;

(2)

for the offense of willfully attempting in any manner to evade or defeat any tax or the payment thereof;

(3)

for the offense of willfully aiding or assisting in, or procuring, counseling, or advising, the preparation or presentation under, or in connection with any matter arising under, the internal revenue laws, of a false or fraudulent return, affidavit, claim, or document (whether or not such falsity or fraud is with the knowledge or consent of the person authorized or required to present such return, affidavit, claim, or document);

(4)

for the offense of willfully failing to pay any tax, or make any return (other than a return required under authority of part III of subchapter A of chapter 61) at the time or times required by law or regulations;

(5)

for offenses described in sections 7206(1) and 7207 (relating to false statements and fraudulent documents);

(6)

for the offense described in section 7212(a) (relating to intimidation of officers and employees of the United States);

(7)

for offenses described in section 7214(a) committed by officers and employees of the United States; and

(8)

for offenses arising under

section 371 of Title 18

of the United States Code, where the object of the conspiracy is to attempt in any manner to evade or defeat any tax or the payment thereof.

The time during which the person committing any of the various offenses arising under the internal revenue laws is outside the United States or is a fugitive from justice within the meaning of

section 3290 of Title 18

of the United States Code, shall not be taken as any part of the time limited by law for the commencement of such proceedings. (The preceding sentence shall also be deemed an amendment to section 3748(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, and shall apply in lieu of the sentence in section 3748(a) which relates to the time during which a person committing an offense is absent from the district wherein the same is committed, except that such amendment shall apply only if the period of limitations under section 3748 would, without the application of such amendment, expire more than 3 years after the date of enactment of this title, and except that such period shall not, with the application of this amendment, expire prior to the date which is 3 years after the date of enactment of this title.) Where a complaint is instituted before a commissioner of the United States within the period above limited, the time shall be extended until the date which is 9 months after the date of the making of the complaint before the commissioner of the United States. For the purpose of determining the periods of limitation on criminal prosecutions, the rules of section 6513 shall be applicable.

47 Citing Cases

As an example, section 6531 provides periods oflimitation on criminal prosecutions: SEC.

As an example, section 6531 provides periods oflimitation on criminal prosecutions: SEC.

Thus Mr. Nguyen, indicted Nov. 6, 2002, could not be charged with violations of sec. 7202 for returns filed before November 1996. Petitioner relies on Bower v. O’Hara, 759 F.2d 1117, 1124-1126 (3d Cir. 1985), for the proposition that a guilty plea is insufficient for issue preclusion. The rule in Bower depends on the underlying law (e

Patrick J. McGowan, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2008-125 · 2008

ovided in paragraph (2), if a hearing is requested under subsection (a)(3)(B), the levy actions which are the subject of the requested hearing and the running of any period of limitations under section 6502 (relating to collection after assessment), section 6531 (relating to criminal prosecutions), or section 6532 (relating to other suits) shall be suspended for the period during which such hearing, and appeals therein, are pending.

Norman P. Schneller, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2008-196 · 2008

ovided in paragraph (2), if a hearing is requested under subsection (a)(3)(B), the levy actions which are the subject of the requested hearing and the running of any period of limitations under section 6502 (relating to collection after assessment), section 6531 (relating to criminal prosecutions), or section 6532 (relating to other suits) shall be suspended for the period during which such hearing, and appeals therein, are pending .

Joyce E. Beery, Petitioner 122 T.C. No. 9 · 2004

provided in paragraph (2), if a hearing is requested under subsection (a)(3)(B), the levy actions which are the subject of the requested hearing and the running of any period of limitations under sec. 6502 (relating to collection after assessment), sec. 6531 (relating to criminal prosecutions), or sec. 6532 (relating to other suits) shall be suspended for the period during which such hearing, and appeals therein, are pending. In no event shall any such period expire before the 90th day after th

Michael Craig, Petitioner 119 T.C. No. 15 · 2002

* * * * * * * (e) Suspension of Collections and Statute of Limitations.-- (1) In general.--* * * if a hearing is requested * * *, the levy actions which are the subject of the requested hearing and the running of any period of limitations under section 6502 (relating to collection after assessment), section 6531 (relating to criminal prosecutions), or section 6532 (relating to the suits) shall be suspended for the period during which such hearing, and appeals therein, are pending.

lity the summons is issued (or is the agent, nominee, or other person acting under the direction or control of such person), then the running of any period of limitations under section 6501 (relating to the assessment and collection of tax) or under section 6531 (relating to criminal prosecutions) with respect to such person shall be suspended for the period during which a proceeding, and appeals therein, with respect to the enforcement of such summons is pending.

Except as provided in paragraph (2), if a hearing is requested under subsection (a)(3)(B), the levy actions which are the subject of the requested hearing and the running of any period of limitations under section 6502 (relating to collection after assessment), section 6531 (relating to criminal prosecutions), or section 6532 (relating to other suits) shall be suspended for the period during which such hearing, and appeals therein, are pending.

United States v. Blanchard 618 F.3d 562 · Cir.
United States v. Adam 296 F.3d 327 · Cir.
United States v. Hayes · Cir.
United States v. Warren Monroe Hayes, United States of America v. Warren Monroe Hayes 322 F.3d 792 · Cir.
United States v. Mui 214 F. App'x 40 · Cir.
Hefti v. Commissioner 97 T.C. 180 · 1991
United States v. Rabhan 540 F.3d 344 · Cir.
United States v. John Heard, Jr. 709 F.3d 413 · Cir.
United States v. Boykoff 67 F. App'x 15 · Cir.
United States v. Thomas 635 F.3d 13 · Cir.
United States v. Fayez Damra 621 F.3d 474 · Cir.
United States v. Fayez Damra · Cir.
United States v. Peter Giambalvo 810 F.3d 1086 · Cir.
United States v. Donald Wanland, Jr. 830 F.3d 947 · Cir.
United States v. Charles Irby, Jr. 703 F.3d 280 · Cir.
Beery v. Commissioner 122 T.C. 184 · 2004
Craig v. Commissioner 119 T.C. 252 · 2002
Lunsford v. Commissioner 117 T.C. 159 · 2001
United States v. Mark Gyetvay · Cir.
United States v. Ronald DiPietro · Cir.
United States v. Root 585 F.3d 145 · Cir.
United States v. Rigas 605 F.3d 194 · Cir.
United States v. Heinz · Cir.
United States v. Daniels, Gregory R. · Cir.
United States v. Marinello 855 F.3d 455 · Cir.
United States v. Laura Giaimo 854 F.3d 483 · Cir.
United States v. Pursley 22 F.4th 586 · Cir.
United States v. Mubayyid 658 F.3d 35 · Cir.
United States v. Craig Orrock 23 F.4th 1203 · Cir.
United States v. Scarpa 4 F. App'x 115 · Cir.
United States v. Lawrence Laspina, Robert St. Germain 299 F.3d 165 · Cir.
United States v. Gregory R. Daniels and Susan v. Daniels 387 F.3d 636 · Cir.
United States v. Charles Weiss 52 F.4th 546 · Cir.
United States v. Heinz 790 F.3d 365 · Cir.
United States v. O'Georgia 80 F. App'x 439 · Cir.
United States v. Triumph 266 F. App'x 53 · Cir.
United States v. John Perry 714 F.3d 570 · Cir.
United States v. James Snyder 71 F.4th 555 · Cir.