§6621 — Determination of rate of interest
239 citing cases
Statute Text — 26 U.S.C. §6621
The overpayment rate established under this section shall be the sum of—
the Federal short-term rate determined under subsection (b), plus
3 percentage points (2 percentage points in the case of a corporation).
To the extent that an overpayment of tax by a corporation for any taxable period (as defined in subsection (c)(3), applied by substituting “overpayment” for “underpayment”) exceeds $10,000, subparagraph (B) shall be applied by substituting “0.5 percentage point” for “2 percentage points”.
The underpayment rate established under this section shall be the sum of—
the Federal short-term rate determined under subsection (b), plus
3 percentage points.
For purposes of this section—
The Secretary shall determine the Federal short-term rate for the first month in each calendar quarter.
Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the Federal short-term rate determined under paragraph (1) for any month shall apply during the first calendar quarter beginning after such month.
In determining the addition to tax under section 6654 for failure to pay estimated tax for any taxable year, the Federal short-term rate which applies during the 3rd month following such taxable year shall also apply during the first 15 days of the 4th month following such taxable year.
The Federal short-term rate for any month shall be the Federal short-term rate determined during such month by the Secretary in accordance with section 1274(d). Any such rate shall be rounded to the nearest full percent (or, if a multiple of ½ of 1 percent, such rate shall be increased to the next highest full percent).
For purposes of determining the amount of interest payable under section 6601 on any large corporate underpayment for periods after the applicable date, paragraph (2) of subsection (a) shall be applied by substituting “5 percentage points” for “3 percentage points”.
For purposes of this subsection—
The applicable date is the 30th day after the earlier of—
the date on which the 1st letter of proposed deficiency which allows the taxpayer an opportunity for administrative review in the Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals is sent, or
the date on which the deficiency notice under section 6212 is sent.
The preceding sentence shall be applied without regard to any such letter or notice which is withdrawn by the Secretary.
In the case of any underpayment of any tax imposed by this title to which the deficiency procedures do not apply, subparagraph (A) shall be applied by taking into account any letter or notice provided by the Secretary which notifies the taxpayer of the assessment or proposed assessment of the tax.
For purposes of subparagraph (A), a letter or notice shall be disregarded if, during the 30-day period beginning on the day on which it was sent, the taxpayer makes a payment equal to the amount shown as due in such letter or notice, as the case may be.
For purposes of this paragraph, any letter or notice shall be disregarded if the amount of the deficiency or proposed deficiency (or the assessment or proposed assessment) set forth in such letter or notice is not greater than $100,000 (determined by not taking into account any interest, penalties, or additions to tax).
For purposes of this subsection—
The term “large corporate underpayment” means any underpayment of a tax by a C corporation for any taxable period if the amount of such underpayment for such period exceeds $100,000.
For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term “taxable period” means—
in the case of any tax imposed by subtitle A, the taxable year, or
in the case of any other tax, the period to which the underpayment relates.
To the extent that, for any period, interest is payable under subchapter A and allowable under subchapter B on equivalent underpayments and overpayments by the same taxpayer of tax imposed by this title, the net rate of interest under this section on such amounts shall be zero for such period.
Treasury Regulations
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6621-1Interest rate
(a) In general. The interest rate established under section 6621 shall be—
(1) On amounts outstanding before July 1, 1975, 6 percent per annum (or 4 percent in the case of certain extensions of time for payment of taxes as provided in sections 6601 (b) and (j) prior to amendment by section 7(b) of the Act of Jan. 3, 1975 (Pub. L. 93-625, 88 Stat. 2115), and certain overpayments of the unrelated business income tax as provided in section 514(b)(3)(D), prior to its amendment by such Act).
(2) On amounts outstanding—
(3) On amounts outstanding after December 31, 1982, the adjusted rate established by the Commissioner under section 6621(b). This adjusted rate shall be published by the Commissioner in a Revenue Ruling. See § 301.6622-1 for application of daily compounding in determining interest accruing after December 31, 1982. Because interest accruing after December 31, 1982, accrues at the prescribed rate per annum compounded daily, the effective annual percentage rate of interest will exceed the prescribed rate of interest.
(b) [Reserved]
(c) Applicability of interest rate—(1) Computation. Interest and additions to tax on any amount outstanding on a specific day shall be computed at the annual rate applicable on such day.
(2) Additions to tax. Additions to tax under any section of the Code that refers to the annual rate established under this section, including sections 644(a)(2)(B), 4497(c)(2), 6654(a), and 6655 (a) and (g), shall be computed at the same rate per annum as the interest rate set forth under paragraph (a) of this section.
(3) Interest. Interest provided for under any section of the Code that refers to the annual rate established under this section, including sections 47(d)(3)(G), 167(q), 6332(c)(1), 6343(c), 6601(a), 6602, 6611(a), 7426(g), and section 1961(c)(1) or 2411 of title 28 of the United States Code, shall be computed at the rate per annum set forth under paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) Examples. The provisions of this section may be illustrated by the following examples. Example 6 illustrates the computation of interest for interest accuring after December 31, 1982.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6621-1(a)In general.
In general. The interest rate established under section 6621 shall be—
(1) On amounts outstanding before July 1, 1975, 6 percent per annum (or 4 percent in the case of certain extensions of time for payment of taxes as provided in sections 6601 (b) and (j) prior to amendment by section 7(b) of the Act of Jan. 3, 1975 (Pub. L. 93-625, 88 Stat. 2115), and certain overpayments of the unrelated business income tax as provided in section 514(b)(3)(D), prior to its amendment by such Act).
(2) On amounts outstanding—
(3) On amounts outstanding after December 31, 1982, the adjusted rate established by the Commissioner under section 6621(b). This adjusted rate shall be published by the Commissioner in a Revenue Ruling. See § 301.6622-1 for application of daily compounding in determining interest accruing after December 31, 1982. Because interest accruing after December 31, 1982, accrues at the prescribed rate per annum compounded daily, the effective annual percentage rate of interest will exceed the prescribed rate of interest.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6621-1(b)§301.6621-1(b)
[Reserved]
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6621-1(c)Applicability of interest rate—(1) Computation.
Applicability of interest rate—(1) Computation. Interest and additions to tax on any amount outstanding on a specific day shall be computed at the annual rate applicable on such day.
(2) Additions to tax. Additions to tax under any section of the Code that refers to the annual rate established under this section, including sections 644(a)(2)(B), 4497(c)(2), 6654(a), and 6655 (a) and (g), shall be computed at the same rate per annum as the interest rate set forth under paragraph (a) of this section.
(3) Interest. Interest provided for under any section of the Code that refers to the annual rate established under this section, including sections 47(d)(3)(G), 167(q), 6332(c)(1), 6343(c), 6601(a), 6602, 6611(a), 7426(g), and section 1961(c)(1) or 2411 of title 28 of the United States Code, shall be computed at the rate per annum set forth under paragraph (a) of this section.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6621-1(d)Examples.
Examples. The provisions of this section may be illustrated by the following examples. Example 6 illustrates the computation of interest for interest accuring after December 31, 1982.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6621-2TQuestions and answers relating to the increased rate of interest on substantial underpayments attributable to certain tax motivated transactions
The following questions and answers relate to the increased rate of interest on substantial underpayments attributable to certain tax motivated transactions as provided in section 6621(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as added by section 144 of the Tax Reform Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-369, 98 Stat. 682):
Q-1. What is the annual interest rate under section 6621 for purposes of computing the amount of interest that must be paid under section 6601 (relating to interest on underpayments)?
A-1. In general, the annual interest rate for purposes of section 6601 is the adjusted rate of interest established under section 6621 (b) § 301.6621-1 (“adjusted rate”). If, however, a tax motivated underpayment (as defined in A-2 of this section) for a taxable year is substantial (as defined in A-7 of this section), section 6621(d) provides that the annual rate of interest with respect to the tax motivated underpayment is 120 percent of the adjusted rate (“120 percent rate”), rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent.
Q-2. What is a tax motivated underpayment?
A-2. A tax motivated underpayment is the portion of a deficiency (as defined in section 6211) of tax imposed by subtitle A (income taxes) that is attributable to any of the following tax motivated transactions:
(1) Any instance in which the value of any property, or the adjusted basis of any property, claimed on a return is 150 percent or more of the amount determined to be the correct amount of such valuation or adjusted basis (i.e., a valuation overstatement within the meaning of section 6659(c)(1));
(2) Any loss disallowed for any period by reason of section 465(a) or any amount included in gross income by reason of section 465(e);
(3) Any credit disallowed for any period by reason of section 46(c)(8) or section 48(d)(6);
(4) Any loss disallowed for any period with respect to a straddle, as defined in section 1092(c), but without regard to sections 1092 (d) and (e);
(5) Any use of an accounting method that may result in a substantial distortion of income for any period (see A-3 of this section); and
(6) Any deduction disallowed with respect to any other tax motivated transactions (see A-4 of this section).
Q-3. What accounting methods may result in a substantial distortion of income for any period under A-2(5) of this section?
A-3. A deduction or credit disallowed, or income included, in any of the circumstances listed below shall be treated as attributable to the use of an accounting method that may result in a substantial distortion of income and shall thus be a tax motivated transaction that results in a tax motivated underpayment:
(1) Any deduction disallowed for any period by reason of section 464 or section 278(b), relating to certain expenses of farming syndicates;
(2) In the case of a taxpayer who computes taxable income using the cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting, any interest deduction disallowed for any period by reason of section 461(g), relating to prepaid interest, provided the interest is not paid with respect to indebtedness incurred in connection with (i) the purchase, refinancing, or improvement of the principal residence of the taxpayer, or (ii) the purchase of consumer goods by the taxpayer;
(3) Any interest deduction disallowed for any period because the amount of the claimed deduction was computed using a method resulting in an amount of interest for a period that exceeds the true cost of the indebtedness for the period computed by applying the effective rate of interest on the loan to the unpaid balance of the loan for the period (i.e., the economic accrual of interest for the period), provided the interest is not accrued with respect to indebtedness incurred in connection with (i) the purchase, refinancing, or improvement of the principal residence of the taxpayer, or (ii) the purchase of consumer goods by the taxpayer (see Rev. Rul. 83-84, 1983-1 C.B. 97, and sections 163(e), 446(b), and 483);
(4) Any deduction disallowed for any period under section 709, relating to organization or syndication expenditures of a partnership;
(5) In the case of any expenditure described in section 248(b) that was incurred by an S corporation, any deduction disallowed because it exceeds the amount allowable under section 248, relating to organizational expenditures;
(6) Any deduction disallowed for any period under section 267(a), relating to transactions between related taxpayers;
(7) Any deduction disallowed for any period, or any income required to be included for any period, under section 467, relating to certain payments for the use of property or services;
(8) Any deduction disallowed for any period under section 461(i), relating to certain deductions of tax shelters; and
(9) In the case of a taxpayer who computes taxable income using the cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting, any deduction disallowed for any period because (i) the expenditure resulting in the deduction was a deposit rather than a payment, (ii) the expenditure was prepaid for tax avoidance purposes and not for a business purpose, or (iii) the deduction resulted in a material distortion of income (see, e.g., Rev. Rul. 79-229, 1979-2 C.B. 210).
Q-4. Are any transaction other than those specified in A-2 of this section and those involving the use of accounting methods under circumstances specified in A-3 of this section considered tax motivated transactions under A-2(6) of this section?
A-4. Yes. Deductions disallowed under the following provisions are considered to be attributable to tax motivated transactions:
(1) Any deduction disallowed for any period under section 183, relatiing to an activity engaged in by an individual or an S corporation that is not engaged in for profit, and
(2) Any deduction disallowed for any period under section 165(c)(2), relating to any transaction not entered into for profit.
Q-5. How is the amount of a tax motivated underpayment determined?
A-5. Except as provided in A-6 of this section, the amount of a tax motivated underpayment is determined in the following manner:
(1) Calculate the amount of the tax liability for the taxable year as if all items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit, had been reported properly on the income tax return of the taxpayer (“total tax liability”); and
(2) Without taking into account any adjustments to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit that are attributable to tax motivated transactions (as defined in A-2 through A-4 of this section), calculate the amount of the tax liability for the taxable year as if all other items of income, gain loss, deduction, or credit had been reported properly on the income tax return of the taxpayer (“tax liability without regard to tax motivated transactions”).
(3) The difference between the total tax liability and the tax liability without regard to tax motivated transactions is the amount of the tax motivated underpayment.
Q-6: How are the amounts of the tax motivated underpayment and the underpayment attributable to fraud or negligence determined if all or a portion of the taxpayer's underpayment is attributable to one or more tax motivated transactions and all or a portion is subject to the addition to tax imposed by section 6653(a)(2) (in the case of an underpayment attributable to negligence or intentional disregard) or section 6653(b)(2) (in the case of an underpayment attributable to fraud)?
A-6: If all or a portion of the taxpayer's underpayment is attributable to tax motivated transactions, and all or a portion is attributable to fraudulent or negligent items (i.e., items that result in an underpayment subject to the addition to tax imposed by section 6653 (a)(2) or (b)(2)), the amount of the tax motivated underpayment and the underpayment attributable to fraud or negligence is determined in the following manner:
(1) Determine the following amounts;
(i) The tax liability for the taxable year of the taxpayer as if all items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit had been reported properly on the income tax return of the taxpayer (“total tax liability”);
(ii) The tax liability for the taxable year of the taxpayer as if all items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit without taking into account adjustments to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit that are both (a) attributable to tax motivated transactions and (b) subject to section 6653(a)(2) or section 6653(b)(2), had been reported properly on the income tax return of the taxpayer (“tax liability without regard to fraudulent or negligent tax motivated items”);
(iii) The tax liability for the taxable year of the taxpayer as if all items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit, without taking into account adjustments to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit that are subject to section 6653(a)(2) or section 6653(b)(2), had been reported properly on the income tax return of the taxpayer (“tax liability without regard to fraudulent or negligent items”);
(iv) The tax liability for the taxable year of the taxpayer as if all items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit, without taking into account adjustments to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit that are either subject to section 6653(a)(2) or section 6653(b)(2) or attributable to tax motivated transactions, had been reported properly on the income tax return of the taxpayer (“tax liability without regard to tax motivated or fraudulent or negligent items”).
(2) The tax motivated underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items is the excess of the total tax liability over the tax liability determined without regard to fraudulent or negligent tax motivated items ((i)-(ii)).
(3) The tax motivated underpayment is the sum of (a) the tax motivated underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items ((i)-(ii)) plus (b) the excess of the tax liability without regard to fraudulent or negligent items over the tax liability without regard to tax motivated or fraudulent or negligent items ((iii)-(iv)). Interest on this underpayment is computed at the 120 percent rate.
(4) The underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items is the excess of the total tax liability over the tax liability without regard to fraudulent or negligent items ((i)-(iii)). The section 6653 addition to tax is 50 percent of the interest on this underpayment computed at the 120 percent rate on an amount equal to the tax motivated underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items (computed in (2)) and at the adjusted rate on the remainder.
(2) The tax motivated underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items is $2,500 ((i))-(ii) or $39,685−$37,185).
(3) The tax motivated underpayment is $10,844 ((2) + ((iii)-(iv)) or $2,500 + ($33,435−$25,091)). Interest on $10,844 is computed at the 120 percent rate.
(4) The underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items is $6,250 ((i)-(iii) or $39,685−$33,435). The section 6653 addition to tax is 50 percent of the interest on $6,250, computed at the 120 percent rate on an amount equal to the tax motivated underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items ($2,500) and at the adjusted rate on the remainder ($3,750).
(5) In summary, therefore, the total underpayment is $16,514 (total tax liability ($39,685) less reported tax liability ($23,171)) of which $10,844 accrues interest at the 120 percent rate and $5,670 ($16,514−$10,844) accrues interest at the adjusted rate. In addition, $6,250 of the underpayment is subject to the section 6653(a)(2) or section 6653(b)(2) addition to tax. The underlying interest, upon which the addition to tax is based, is computed using the 120 percent rate for the portion of the underpayment subject to section 6621(d) ($2,500) and the adjusted rate for the portion that is not subject to section 6621(d) ($3,750).
Q-7. Does the 120 percent rate apply to all tax motivated underpayments?
A-7. No. The 120 percent rate applies only if the tax motivated underpayment for the taxable year is substantial. A tax motivated underpayment is substantial only if it exceeds $1,000. If, for example, a taxpayer has a $600 underpayment attributable to a valuation overstatement (within the meaning of section 6659(c)(1)) and a $500 underpayment attributable to a loss disallowed under section 465(a), the amount of the tax motivated underpayment is $1,100. Because the amount of the tax motivated underpayment is thus substantial the 120 percent rate applies.
Q-8. How do carryovers affect the amount of the tax motivated underpayment and the amount of the underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items?
A-8. For purposes of A-5 and A-6 of this section, a net operating loss carryover, capital loss carryover, or credit carryover is treated as a deduction or credit in the year in which taken into account. In any computation of tax liability required under A-5 or A-6 of this section (i.e., total tax liability, tax liability without regard to tax motivated transactions, etc.), the amount of such deduction or credit is the amount of the carryover determined as if the taxpayer had properly reported in each taxable year all items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit affecting the amount of the carryover other than adjustments of a type not taken into account in such computation of tax liability. A net operating loss carryback, capital loss carryback, or credit carryback is not taken into account, however, in determining the amount of the tax motivated underpayment or the amount of the underpayment attributable to fraud or negligence for periods before the last date prescribed for filing the income tax return for the taxable year in which the carryback arises (determined without regard to extensions).
Q-9. What amount is subject to the 120 percent rate if the amount of a taxpayer's unpaid tax for a year is less than the taxpayer's substantial tax motivated underpayment?
A-9. The 120 percent rate applies with respect to the lesser of—
(1) The amount of unpaid tax for the taxable year determined in accordance with § 301.6601-1; or
(2) The substantial tax motivated underpayment for the taxable year.
Q-10. What is the effective date for the 120 percent rate?
A-10. The 120 percent rate applies to interest accruing on a deficiency attributable to a substantial tax motivated underpayment after December 31, 1984, including interest accruing with respect to transactions described in A-3 and A-4 of this section, regardless of the date prescribed for payment of the tax.
Q-11. Can a taxpayer stop the running of interest on a tax motivated underpayment by application of a remittance?
A-11. Yes. The running of interest on a tax liability stops on the date the remittance (either a payment of tax or a deposit in the nature of a cash bond) is received by the Internal Revenue Service, regardless of when the liability is assessed or the remittance is actually applied against the taxpayer's account. A taxpayer must make a remittance for both the tax liability and the interest that has accrued as of the date of remittance to stop the running of interest on both the tax liability and the accrued interest with respect to the liability. (See Rev. Proc. 84-58.) Taxpayer cannot make partial remittances applicable only to tax motivated underpayments. Under A-9 of this section, the 120 percent rate applies to the amount of unpaid tax to the extent that amount does not exceed the tax motivated underpayment. Therefore, a partial remittance is applied first to any tax due that is not attributable to a tax motivated underpayment. The excess of the partial remittance over tax that is not attributable to a tax motivated underpayment, if any, will then be applied to tax due that is attributable to a tax motivated underpayment.
Q-12. Does the 120 percent rate apply to interest accruing on interest, penalties, additional amounts, or additions to tax as provided in section 6601(e)(2)?
A-12. The 120 percent rate applies only to taxes imposed by subtitle A (income taxes) and to interest accrued with respect to such taxes. The penalties, additional amounts, and additions to tax specified in section 6601(e)(2) are not imposed by subtitle A and are not, therefore, included in the amount of a tax motivated underpayment. They are, however, included in the amount of unpaid tax for purposes of A-9 of this section.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6621-2T(i)§301.6621-2T(i)
The tax liability for the taxable year of the taxpayer as if all items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit had been reported properly on the income tax return of the taxpayer (“total tax liability”);
(ii) The tax liability for the taxable year of the taxpayer as if all items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit without taking into account adjustments to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit that are both (a) attributable to tax motivated transactions and (b) subject to section 6653(a)(2) or section 6653(b)(2), had been reported properly on the income tax return of the taxpayer (“tax liability without regard to fraudulent or negligent tax motivated items”);
(iii) The tax liability for the taxable year of the taxpayer as if all items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit, without taking into account adjustments to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit that are subject to section 6653(a)(2) or section 6653(b)(2), had been reported properly on the income tax return of the taxpayer (“tax liability without regard to fraudulent or negligent items”);
(iv) The tax liability for the taxable year of the taxpayer as if all items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit, without taking into account adjustments to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit that are either subject to section 6653(a)(2) or section 6653(b)(2) or attributable to tax motivated transactions, had been reported properly on the income tax return of the taxpayer (“tax liability without regard to tax motivated or fraudulent or negligent items”).
(2) The tax motivated underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items is the excess of the total tax liability over the tax liability determined without regard to fraudulent or negligent tax motivated items ((i)-(ii)).
(3) The tax motivated underpayment is the sum of (a) the tax motivated underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items ((i)-(ii)) plus (b) the excess of the tax liability without regard to fraudulent or negligent items over the tax liability without regard to tax motivated or fraudulent or negligent items ((iii)-(iv)). Interest on this underpayment is computed at the 120 percent rate.
(4) The underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items is the excess of the total tax liability over the tax liability without regard to fraudulent or negligent items ((i)-(iii)). The section 6653 addition to tax is 50 percent of the interest on this underpayment computed at the 120 percent rate on an amount equal to the tax motivated underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items (computed in (2)) and at the adjusted rate on the remainder.
(2) The tax motivated underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items is $2,500 ((i))-(ii) or $39,685−$37,185).
(3) The tax motivated underpayment is $10,844 ((2) + ((iii)-(iv)) or $2,500 + ($33,435−$25,091)). Interest on $10,844 is computed at the 120 percent rate.
(4) The underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items is $6,250 ((i)-(iii) or $39,685−$33,435). The section 6653 addition to tax is 50 percent of the interest on $6,250, computed at the 120 percent rate on an amount equal to the tax motivated underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items ($2,500) and at the adjusted rate on the remainder ($3,750).
(5) In summary, therefore, the total underpayment is $16,514 (total tax liability ($39,685) less reported tax liability ($23,171)) of which $10,844 accrues interest at the 120 percent rate and $5,670 ($16,514−$10,844) accrues interest at the adjusted rate. In addition, $6,250 of the underpayment is subject to the section 6653(a)(2) or section 6653(b)(2) addition to tax. The underlying interest, upon which the addition to tax is based, is computed using the 120 percent rate for the portion of the underpayment subject to section 6621(d) ($2,500) and the adjusted rate for the portion that is not subject to section 6621(d) ($3,750).
Q-7. Does the 120 percent rate apply to all tax motivated underpayments?
A-7. No. The 120 percent rate applies only if the tax motivated underpayment for the taxable year is substantial. A tax motivated underpayment is substantial only if it exceeds $1,000. If, for example, a taxpayer has a $600 underpayment attributable to a valuation overstatement (within the meaning of section 6659(c)(1)) and a $500 underpayment attributable to a loss disallowed under section 465(a), the amount of the tax motivated underpayment is $1,100. Because the amount of the tax motivated underpayment is thus substantial the 120 percent rate applies.
Q-8. How do carryovers affect the amount of the tax motivated underpayment and the amount of the underpayment attributable to fraudulent or negligent items?
A-8. For purposes of A-5 and A-6 of this section, a net operating loss carryover, capital loss carryover, or credit carryover is treated as a deduction or credit in the year in which taken into account. In any computation of tax liability required under A-5 or A-6 of this section (i.e., total tax liability, tax liability without regard to tax motivated transactions, etc.), the amount of such deduction or credit is the amount of the carryover determined as if the taxpayer had properly reported in each taxable year all items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit affecting the amount of the carryover other than adjustments of a type not taken into account in such computation of tax liability. A net operating loss carryback, capital loss carryback, or credit carryback is not taken into account, however, in determining the amount of the tax motivated underpayment or the amount of the underpayment attributable to fraud or negligence for periods before the last date prescribed for filing the income tax return for the taxable year in which the carryback arises (determined without regard to extensions).
Q-9. What amount is subject to the 120 percent rate if the amount of a taxpayer's unpaid tax for a year is less than the taxpayer's substantial tax motivated underpayment?
A-9. The 120 percent rate applies with respect to the lesser of—
(1) The amount of unpaid tax for the taxable year determined in accordance with § 301.6601-1; or
(2) The substantial tax motivated underpayment for the taxable year.
Q-10. What is the effective date for the 120 percent rate?
A-10. The 120 percent rate applies to interest accruing on a deficiency attributable to a substantial tax motivated underpayment after December 31, 1984, including interest accruing with respect to transactions described in A-3 and A-4 of this section, regardless of the date prescribed for payment of the tax.
Q-11. Can a taxpayer stop the running of interest on a tax motivated underpayment by application of a remittance?
A-11. Yes. The running of interest on a tax liability stops on the date the remittance (either a payment of tax or a deposit in the nature of a cash bond) is received by the Internal Revenue Service, regardless of when the liability is assessed or the remittance is actually applied against the taxpayer's account. A taxpayer must make a remittance for both the tax liability and the interest that has accrued as of the date of remittance to stop the running of interest on both the tax liability and the accrued interest with respect to the liability. (See Rev. Proc. 84-58.) Taxpayer cannot make partial remittances applicable only to tax motivated underpayments. Under A-9 of this section, the 120 percent rate applies to the amount of unpaid tax to the extent that amount does not exceed the tax motivated underpayment. Therefore, a partial remittance is applied first to any tax due that is not attributable to a tax motivated underpayment. The excess of the partial remittance over tax that is not attributable to a tax motivated underpayment, if any, will then be applied to tax due that is attributable to a tax motivated underpayment.
Q-12. Does the 120 percent rate apply to interest accruing on interest, penalties, additional amounts, or additions to tax as provided in section 6601(e)(2)?
A-12. The 120 percent rate applies only to taxes imposed by subtitle A (income taxes) and to interest accrued with respect to such taxes. The penalties, additional amounts, and additions to tax specified in section 6601(e)(2) are not imposed by subtitle A and are not, therefore, included in the amount of a tax motivated underpayment. They are, however, included in the amount of unpaid tax for purposes of A-9 of this section.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6621-3Higher interest rate payable on large corporate underpayments
(a) In general. Section 6621 establishes the interest rate for purposes of computing the amount of interest that must be paid under section 6601, relating to interest on underpayments of tax. Section 6621(a)(2) provides that the underpayment rate is the sum of the Federal short-term rate (determined under section 6621(b)) plus 3 percentage points. That underpayment rate is referred to hereinafter as the “section 6621(a)(2) rate.” Section 6621(c) and this section, however, provide that the underpayment rate on any large corporate underpayment is the sum of the Federal short-term rate (determined under section 6621(b)) plus 5 percentage points. This higher underpayment rate is referred to hereinafter as the “section 6621(c) rate.” The section 6621(c) rate applies only for periods after the applicable date (as determined in paragraph (c) of this section).
(b) Large corporate underpayment—(1) Defined. For purposes of section 6621(c) and this section, “large corporate underpayment” means any underpayment of a tax by a C corporation for any taxable period if the amount of the threshold underpayment of the tax (as defined in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section) for that taxable period exceeds $100,000.
(2) Underpayment of a tax—(i) In general. As used in section 6621(c) and this section, “underpayment of a tax” means the excess of a tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code over the amount of such tax paid on or before the last date prescribed for payment. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section, “tax” for such purposes includes interest, penalties, additional amounts, and additions to tax. See sections 6601(e)(1), 6665(a), and 6671(a). Thus, the section 6621(c) rate generally applies to any interest, penalties, additional amounts, and additions to tax, as well as to the underlying tax with respect to which such amounts are imposed.
(ii) Threshold underpayment of a tax. Solely for purposes of this section and not for any other purpose under section 6621(c) or elsewhere in the interpretation or administration of the federal tax laws, a “threshold underpayment of a tax” is the excess of a tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code (exclusive of interest, penalties, additional amounts, and additions to tax) for the taxable period over the amount of such tax paid on or before the last date prescribed for payment. Thus, any payments made after the last date prescribed for payment (for example, by way of an amended return) will not affect the existence of a threshold underpayment. In determining whether there is a threshold underpayment, different types of taxes (such as income tax and FICA tax) and amounts that relate to different taxable periods are not added together.
(iii) When determined—(A) In general. The existence of a threshold underpayment of a tax and the amount of a large corporate underpayment are generally determined only when an assessment is made with respect to the taxable period. Thus, the amount of a deficiency or proposed deficiency set forth in a letter or notice pursuant to which the applicable date is determined (under paragraph (c) of this section) does not determine whether there is a large corporate underpayment.
(B) Judicial determinations. Notwithstanding any prior assessment made with respect to a taxable period, the section 6621(c) rate does not apply if, after a federal court determines the taxpayer's liability for a period, the threshold underpayment for that taxable period does not exceed $100,000. See Example 3 in paragraph (d) of this section.
(iv) Special rule. The section 6621(c) rate is not used to compute the interest charges that a taxpayer timely assesses against itself in return for using a method of tax accounting or reporting that defers the payment of tax, such as the interest charges relating to passive foreign investment companies under section 1291(c) and installment obligations of nondealers under section 453A(c). However, to the extent such charges are not paid on or before the last date prescribed for payment and therefore become part of an underpayment of a tax, the section 6621(c) rate will apply to such amounts for periods after the applicable date (as determined in paragraph (c) of this section).
(3) C corporation defined. For purposes of section 6621(c)(3)(A) and this section, “C corporation” means, with respect to any taxable period, a corporation that is a C corporation during any part of the taxable period. Interest on a large corporate underpayment for a taxable period continues to be imposed at the section 6621(c) rate even if during or after the taxable period—
(i) The taxpayer ceases to be a C corporation; or
(ii) The underpayment becomes the liability of a successor or transferee that is not a C corporation.
(4) Taxable period. For purposes of section 6621(c) and this section, the “taxable period” is the taxable year in the case of any tax imposed by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code. In the case of any other tax, the “taxable period” is the period to which the underpayment relates. For example, the taxable period for an underpayment of FICA taxes is the calendar quarter. If the underpayment does not relate to a particular period (for example, in the case of certain transactional excise taxes), the “taxable period” is the period covered by a return on which the tax is required to be shown.
(5) Last date prescribed for payment. For purposes of this section, the “last date prescribed for payment” means the last date prescribed for payment as determined, without regard to any extension of time, under section 6601(b).
(c) Applicable date—(1) In general. The section 6621(c) rate applies only to periods after the applicable date. Pursuant to the effective date of section 6621(c) and paragraph (e) of this section, however, the section 6621(c) rate will not apply prior to January 1, 1991, even if the applicable date is prior to December 31, 1990. A letter or notice relating to a particular type of tax creates an applicable date only for that type of tax. For example, a letter or notice with respect to FUTA tax will not create an applicable date with respect to income tax for the same taxable year.
(2) When deficiency procedures apply. The applicable date, in the case of any underpayment of a tax to which the deficiency procedures of subchapter B of chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code apply, is the 30th day after the earlier of—
(i) The date on which the Service sends the taxpayer the first letter of proposed deficiency that allows the taxpayer an opportunity for administrative review in the Service's Office of Appeals (commonly called a “30-day letter”); or
(ii) The date on which the Service sends a deficiency notice under section 6212 of the Internal Revenue Code (commonly called a “90-day letter”).
(3) When deficiency procedures do not apply. The applicable date, in the case of any underpayment of a tax to which the deficiency procedures do not apply, is the 30th day after the date on which the Service sends the first letter or notice that notifies the taxpayer of an assessment or proposed assessment of the tax. In the case of income taxes, for example, the deficiency procedures do not apply to amounts shown as due on the taxpayer's return if the taxpayer fails to remit the full amount on or before the last date prescribed for payment, and to amounts attributable to mathematical or clerical errors on a return (unless a request for abatement is filed by the taxpayer under section 6213(b)). Because no 30-day letter or 90-day letter is issued to the taxpayer in such cases, the applicable date is the 30th day after the date on which an assessment notice under section 6303 of the Internal Revenue Code is sent.
(4) Partnership items. For purposes of section 6621(c) and this paragraph (c), 60-day letters and the notices described in sections 6223(a)(1) and 6223(a)(2) (relating to administrative proceedings at the partnership level) are not treated as letters of proposed deficiency that allow the taxpayer an opportunity for administrative review in the Service's Office of Appeals, deficiency notices under section 6212 of the Internal Revenue Code, or letters or notices that notify the taxpayer of an assessment or proposed assessment of the tax. Thus, in the absence of any other letter or notice described in paragraph (c)(2) or (c)(3) of this section that establishes an earlier applicable date, the applicable date in the case of any underpayment of a tax attributable, in whole or in part, to a partnership item (as defined in section 6231(a)(3)) is the 30th day after the date on which the Service sends the first letter or notice that notifies the taxpayer of an assessment of the tax.
(5) Exception of payment of amount shown as due—(i) In general. A letter of notice will be disregarded for purposes of determining the applicable date if the taxpayer makes a payment equal to the amount shown as due in the letter or notice within 30 days from the date that the Service sends the letter or notice.
(ii) Special transition rule. A letter or notice sent by the Service prior to January 1, 1991, will be disregarded by the Service for purposes of determining the applicable date if the taxpayer makes a payment on or before January 31, 1991, equal to the amount shown as due in the letter or notice plus a reasonable estimate of the interest payable on such amount computed by applying the section 6621(a)(2) rate. If the taxpayer has received two or more letters or notices with respect to the same tax for the same taxable period and pays the amount shown as due in the last letter or notice sent prior to December 19, 1990, (plus a reasonable estimate of the interest), all of the prior letters and notices with respect to the same tax for the same taxable period will be disregarded under this paragraph (c)(5)(ii). In the case of an assessment notice, the payment of the amount of interest shown as due on the last assessment notice sent to the taxpayer prior to December 19, 1990, will be treated as a payment of a reasonable estimate of the interest payable on the amount shown in that assessment notice or in any prior assessment notice sent with respect to the same tax for the same taxable period. The special transition rule in this paragraph (c)(5)(ii) applies even if the payment is not made within 30 days of the date on which the Service sent the letter or notice.
(iii) Amount shown as due. For purposes of section 6621(c)(2)(B)(ii) and this paragraph (c)(5), the “amount shown as due” in any letter or notice means the total amount of tax, as well as any interest, penalties, additional amounts, and additions to tax that are set forth in the letter or notice. A deposit in the nature of a cash bond will not be considered a payment of the amount shown as due.
(6) Exception for withdrawn letters and notices—(i) Letters of proposed deficiency. A letter of proposed deficiency will be disregarded for purposes of determining the applicable date if the letter of proposed deficiency is issued as a result of an administrative error either to the wrong taxpayer or for the wrong taxable period.
(ii) Deficiency notices. A deficiency notice under section 6212 of the Internal Revenue Code will be disregarded for purposes of determining the applicable date if the deficiency notice is rescinded under section 6212(d).
(iii) Assessment letters and notices. A letter or notice that notifies the taxpayer of an assessment or proposed assessment of tax will be disregarded for purposes of determining the applicable date if the full amount of tax assessed is subsequently abated.
(d) Examples. The application of this section may be illustrated by the following examples.
(e) Effective date. Section 6621(c) and this section are effective for determining interest for periods after December 31, 1990, regardless of the taxable period to which the underlying tax may relate and even if the applicable date is prior to December 31, 1990.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6621-3(a)In general.
In general. Section 6621 establishes the interest rate for purposes of computing the amount of interest that must be paid under section 6601, relating to interest on underpayments of tax. Section 6621(a)(2) provides that the underpayment rate is the sum of the Federal short-term rate (determined under section 6621(b)) plus 3 percentage points. That underpayment rate is referred to hereinafter as the “section 6621(a)(2) rate.” Section 6621(c) and this section, however, provide that the underpayment rate on any large corporate underpayment is the sum of the Federal short-term rate (determined under section 6621(b)) plus 5 percentage points. This higher underpayment rate is referred to hereinafter as the “section 6621(c) rate.” The section 6621(c) rate applies only for periods after the applicable date (as determined in paragraph (c) of this section).
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6621-3(b)Large corporate underpayment—(1) Defined.
Large corporate underpayment—(1) Defined. For purposes of section 6621(c) and this section, “large corporate underpayment” means any underpayment of a tax by a C corporation for any taxable period if the amount of the threshold underpayment of the tax (as defined in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section) for that taxable period exceeds $100,000.
(2) Underpayment of a tax—(i) In general. As used in section 6621(c) and this section, “underpayment of a tax” means the excess of a tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code over the amount of such tax paid on or before the last date prescribed for payment. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section, “tax” for such purposes includes interest, penalties, additional amounts, and additions to tax. See sections 6601(e)(1), 6665(a), and 6671(a). Thus, the section 6621(c) rate generally applies to any interest, penalties, additional amounts, and additions to tax, as well as to the underlying tax with respect to which such amounts are imposed.
(ii) Threshold underpayment of a tax. Solely for purposes of this section and not for any other purpose under section 6621(c) or elsewhere in the interpretation or administration of the federal tax laws, a “threshold underpayment of a tax” is the excess of a tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code (exclusive of interest, penalties, additional amounts, and additions to tax) for the taxable period over the amount of such tax paid on or before the last date prescribed for payment. Thus, any payments made after the last date prescribed for payment (for example, by way of an amended return) will not affect the existence of a threshold underpayment. In determining whether there is a threshold underpayment, different types of taxes (such as income tax and FICA tax) and amounts that relate to different taxable periods are not added together.
(iii) When determined—(A) In general. The existence of a threshold underpayment of a tax and the amount of a large corporate underpayment are generally determined only when an assessment is made with respect to the taxable period. Thus, the amount of a deficiency or proposed deficiency set forth in a letter or notice pursuant to which the applicable date is determined (under paragraph (c) of this section) does not determine whether there is a large corporate underpayment.
(B) Judicial determinations. Notwithstanding any prior assessment made with respect to a taxable period, the section 6621(c) rate does not apply if, after a federal court determines the taxpayer's liability for a period, the threshold underpayment for that taxable period does not exceed $100,000. See Example 3 in paragraph (d) of this section.
(iv) Special rule. The section 6621(c) rate is not used to compute the interest charges that a taxpayer timely assesses against itself in return for using a method of tax accounting or reporting that defers the payment of tax, such as the interest charges relating to passive foreign investment companies under section 1291(c) and installment obligations of nondealers under section 453A(c). However, to the extent such charges are not paid on or before the last date prescribed for payment and therefore become part of an underpayment of a tax, the section 6621(c) rate will apply to such amounts for periods after the applicable date (as determined in paragraph (c) of this section).
(3) C corporation defined. For purposes of section 6621(c)(3)(A) and this section, “C corporation” means, with respect to any taxable period, a corporation that is a C corporation during any part of the taxable period. Interest on a large corporate underpayment for a taxable period continues to be imposed at the section 6621(c) rate even if during or after the taxable period—
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6621-3(c)Applicable date—(1) In general.
Applicable date—(1) In general. The section 6621(c) rate applies only to periods after the applicable date. Pursuant to the effective date of section 6621(c) and paragraph (e) of this section, however, the section 6621(c) rate will not apply prior to January 1, 1991, even if the applicable date is prior to December 31, 1990. A letter or notice relating to a particular type of tax creates an applicable date only for that type of tax. For example, a letter or notice with respect to FUTA tax will not create an applicable date with respect to income tax for the same taxable year.
(2) When deficiency procedures apply. The applicable date, in the case of any underpayment of a tax to which the deficiency procedures of subchapter B of chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code apply, is the 30th day after the earlier of—
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6621-3(d)Examples.
Examples. The application of this section may be illustrated by the following examples.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6621-3(e)Effective date.
Effective date. Section 6621(c) and this section are effective for determining interest for periods after December 31, 1990, regardless of the taxable period to which the underlying tax may relate and even if the applicable date is prior to December 31, 1990.
-
Treas. Reg. §301.6621-3(i)§301.6621-3(i)
The date on which the Service sends the taxpayer the first letter of proposed deficiency that allows the taxpayer an opportunity for administrative review in the Service's Office of Appeals (commonly called a “30-day letter”); or
(ii) The date on which the Service sends a deficiency notice under section 6212 of the Internal Revenue Code (commonly called a “90-day letter”).
(3) When deficiency procedures do not apply. The applicable date, in the case of any underpayment of a tax to which the deficiency procedures do not apply, is the 30th day after the date on which the Service sends the first letter or notice that notifies the taxpayer of an assessment or proposed assessment of the tax. In the case of income taxes, for example, the deficiency procedures do not apply to amounts shown as due on the taxpayer's return if the taxpayer fails to remit the full amount on or before the last date prescribed for payment, and to amounts attributable to mathematical or clerical errors on a return (unless a request for abatement is filed by the taxpayer under section 6213(b)). Because no 30-day letter or 90-day letter is issued to the taxpayer in such cases, the applicable date is the 30th day after the date on which an assessment notice under section 6303 of the Internal Revenue Code is sent.
(4) Partnership items. For purposes of section 6621(c) and this paragraph (c), 60-day letters and the notices described in sections 6223(a)(1) and 6223(a)(2) (relating to administrative proceedings at the partnership level) are not treated as letters of proposed deficiency that allow the taxpayer an opportunity for administrative review in the Service's Office of Appeals, deficiency notices under section 6212 of the Internal Revenue Code, or letters or notices that notify the taxpayer of an assessment or proposed assessment of the tax. Thus, in the absence of any other letter or notice described in paragraph (c)(2) or (c)(3) of this section that establishes an earlier applicable date, the applicable date in the case of any underpayment of a tax attributable, in whole or in part, to a partnership item (as defined in section 6231(a)(3)) is the 30th day after the date on which the Service sends the first letter or notice that notifies the taxpayer of an assessment of the tax.
(5) Exception of payment of amount shown as due—(i) In general. A letter of notice will be disregarded for purposes of determining the applicable date if the taxpayer makes a payment equal to the amount shown as due in the letter or notice within 30 days from the date that the Service sends the letter or notice.
(ii) Special transition rule. A letter or notice sent by the Service prior to January 1, 1991, will be disregarded by the Service for purposes of determining the applicable date if the taxpayer makes a payment on or before January 31, 1991, equal to the amount shown as due in the letter or notice plus a reasonable estimate of the interest payable on such amount computed by applying the section 6621(a)(2) rate. If the taxpayer has received two or more letters or notices with respect to the same tax for the same taxable period and pays the amount shown as due in the last letter or notice sent prior to December 19, 1990, (plus a reasonable estimate of the interest), all of the prior letters and notices with respect to the same tax for the same taxable period will be disregarded under this paragraph (c)(5)(ii). In the case of an assessment notice, the payment of the amount of interest shown as due on the last assessment notice sent to the taxpayer prior to December 19, 1990, will be treated as a payment of a reasonable estimate of the interest payable on the amount shown in that assessment notice or in any prior assessment notice sent with respect to the same tax for the same taxable period. The special transition rule in this paragraph (c)(5)(ii) applies even if the payment is not made within 30 days of the date on which the Service sent the letter or notice.
(iii) Amount shown as due. For purposes of section 6621(c)(2)(B)(ii) and this paragraph (c)(5), the “amount shown as due” in any letter or notice means the total amount of tax, as well as any interest, penalties, additional amounts, and additions to tax that are set forth in the letter or notice. A deposit in the nature of a cash bond will not be considered a payment of the amount shown as due.
(6) Exception for withdrawn letters and notices—(i) Letters of proposed deficiency. A letter of proposed deficiency will be disregarded for purposes of determining the applicable date if the letter of proposed deficiency is issued as a result of an administrative error either to the wrong taxpayer or for the wrong taxable period.
(ii) Deficiency notices. A deficiency notice under section 6212 of the Internal Revenue Code will be disregarded for purposes of determining the applicable date if the deficiency notice is rescinded under section 6212(d).
(iii) Assessment letters and notices. A letter or notice that notifies the taxpayer of an assessment or proposed assessment of tax will be disregarded for purposes of determining the applicable date if the full amount of tax assessed is subsequently abated.
239 Citing Cases
In Tricarichi II we held that the IRS was entitled to recover pre- notice interest from the transferee, at the rate specified in section 6621, because the transferee “received assets with a value in excess of [the transferor’s] total Federal tax liability (including pre-notice interest).” Id.
In Tricarichi II we held that the IRS was entitled to recover pre- notice interest from the transferee, at the rate specified in section 6621, because the transferee “received assets with a value in excess of [the transferor’s] total Federal tax liability (including pre-notice interest).” Id.
In Tricarichi II we held that the IRS was entitled to recover pre- notice interest from the transferee, at the rate specified in section 6621, because the transferee “received assets with a value in excess of [the transferor’s] total Federal tax liability (including pre-notice interest).” Id.
The section 6654(a) addition to tax is determined by applying the underpayment rate established under section 6621 to the amount ofthe underpayment" for the period ofthe underpayment.¹² Ifthe taxpayer challenges the section 6654(a) addition to tax, the Commissioner must introduce evidence to prove that the taxpayerhad an obligation to make estimated tax payments for the year at issue, by showing whether the taxpayer filed a return for the prior yea
The undersigned [petitioners] spent 20 years fighting section 6621 penalties and valuation penalties associated with the infamous FoodSource cases.
- 19 - [*19] efficient, and consistent disposition ofpartnership litigation pursuant to section 6621, et seq." R at 1127.
omitted.] Section 6611(a) provides that "[i]nterest shall be allowed and paid upon any overpayment in respect ofany internal revenue tax at the overpayment rate established under section 6621." The term 'overpayment' has been interpreted to mean "any payment in excess ofthat which is properly due." Jones v.
- 19 - [*19] efficient, and consistent disposition ofpartnership litigation pursuant to section 6621, et seq." R at 1127.
- 19 - [*19] efficient, and consistent disposition ofpartnership litigation pursuant to section 6621, et seq." R at 1127.
The undersigned [petitioners] spent 20 years fighting section 6621 penalties and valuation penalties associated with the infamous FoodSource cases.
- 19 - [*19] efficient, and consistent disposition ofpartnership litigation pursuant to section 6621, et seq." R at 1127.
The section 6654(a) addition to tax is determined by applying the underpayment rate 18 established under section 6621 to the amount ofthe underpayment¹³ for the period ofthe underpayment.¹4 This addition to tax under section 6654 is mandatory unless the taxpayer can place herselfunder one ofthe computational exceptions provided in that section.
6621 establishes the rate ofinterest for postnotice interest for the postnotice interest period. See Shockley v. Commissioner, at *7. -238- [*238] amount ofassets that the transferor-taxpayers transferred to the transferee- taxpayer. See id. It is respondent's position that respondent is entitled to prenotice interest from each ofMr. Fankhaus
OPINION Interest on a Federal income tax deficiency generally accrues at the rate specified by section 6621 from the last date prescribed for payment until the date on which the tax is paid.
Interest accrues on a Federal gift tax liability at the rate specified by section 6621 from the last date prescribed for payment until the date on which the tax is actually paid.
6621 establishes the rate ofinterest for postnotice interest for the postnotice interest period. See Shockley v. Commissioner, at *7. -238- [*238] amount ofassets that the transferor-taxpayers transferred to the transferee- taxpayer. See id. It is respondent's position that respondent is entitled to prenotice interest from each ofMr. Fankhaus
6621 establishes the rate ofinterest for postnotice interest for the postnotice interest period. See Shockley v. Commissioner, at *7. -238- [*238] amount ofassets that the transferor-taxpayers transferred to the transferee- taxpayer. See id. It is respondent's position that respondent is entitled to prenotice interest from each ofMr. Fankhaus
The section 6654(a) addition to tax is determined by applying the underpayment interest rate established under section 6621 to the amount ofthe underpayment for the period ofthe underpayment.
at 959 (referencing the same section in the Internal Revenue Code of 1954); see also section 6621 (establishing the interest rate).
The section-6654(a) addition to tax is determined by applying the underpaymentrate established under section 6621 to the amount ofthe underpayment for the period ofthe underpayment.
The addition to tax is calculated by applying the section 6621 underpayment interest rate to the amount ofeach underpayment from the due date ofeach installment until April 15 following the close ofthe taxable year (for calendar-yeartaxpayers).
Section 6651(a)(2) provides that ifa taxpayer fails to pay taxes, unless the failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, there shall be added to the amount required to be shown as tax on the return an,amount equal to 0.5% for each month during which the taxpayercontinues to fail to pay such taxes, not exceed
The section 6654(a) addition to tax is calculated by applying the section 6621 underpayment interest rate to the amount ofeach underpayment from the due date ofeach installment until April 15 following the close ofthe taxable year (for calendar yeartaxpayers).
al revenue tax (or any interest, assessable penalty, additional amount, or addition to tax) which has been erroneously refunded, and which is recoverable by suit pursuant to section 7405, shall bear interest at the underpaymentrate established under section 6621 from the date ofthe payment ofthe refund." Section 7405 concerns actions for recovery oferroneous refunds, and section 7405(b) provides: "Any portion ofa tax imposed by this title which has been erroneously refunded (ifsuch refund - 12 -
The section 6654(a) addition to tax is calculated by applying the section 6621 underpayment interest rate to the amount ofeach underpayment from the due date ofeach installment until April 15 following the close ofthe taxable year (for calendar year taxpayers).
The underpayment additipn rate is determined pursuant to section 6621 and is applied to the amount ofthe estimatedtax underpayment for the period ofunderpayment.
- 10 - stipulation offacts and the accompanying exhibits as to materiality for paragraphs 33 through 48 and the corresponding Exhibits 18-P through 32-P.6 Discussion Interest on a Federal incometax deficiency generally accrues at the rate specified by section 6621 from the last date prescribed for payment.until the date on which the tax is paid.
Consistent with this approach, the court expressly rejects "that the interest rate on deferred taxes för purposes of [11 U.S.C.] § 1129(a)(9)(C) is fixed as § 6621 provides." Id.
l revenue tax (or any interest, assessable penalty, additional amount, or addition to tax) which has been erroneously refunded, and which is recoverable by suit pursuant to section 7405, shall bear interest at the underpayment rate established under section 6621 from the date of the payment of the refund.” Section 7405 concerns actions for recovery of erroneous refunds, and section 7405(b) provides: “Any portion of a tax imposed by this title which has been erroneously refunded (if such refund w
The section 6654(a) addition to tax is calculated by applying the section 6621 underpayment interest rate to the amount of each underpayment from the due date of each installment until April 15 following the close of the taxable year (for calendar year taxpayers).
The section 6654(a) addition to tax is determined by applying the underpayment rate established under section 6621 to the amount of the underpayment' for the period of '"[A]mount of the underpayment" means the excess of the required installment over the amount, if any, of the installment paid on or before the due date for the installment.
Section 6601(a) provides that if-a taxpayer fails'to pay the tàx imposed by the/Code, eihterest shall, accrue from the- date that ther tax payment is due- until the date it sis*paid. eThe rate of interest is "the underpayment rate established under section 6621" . 22 .llustrat he alâulation of undeFþayment 2This statutory language is in effect for interest? accruing after December 31, 1986e -For interest accruing befores then, the statute istworded differently but is substantively the same for
The section 6654(a) addition to tax is determined by applying the underpayment rate established under -12- section 6621 to the amount of the underpayments for the period of the underpayment.' The addition.to tax is.also calculated with reference to four required installment payments of the taxpayer's estimated income tax.
The section 6654(a) addition to tax is determined by applying the underpayment rate established under section 6621 to the amount of the underpayments for the period of the underpayment.
579, to implement procedures for a taxpayer to request interest -19- netting under section 6621(d) and the special rule. On December 17, 1999, petitioners requested administrative interest-netting relief by filing a timely claim with respondent on Form 843, Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement, in accordance with the revenue proceduke. RRA 1998 sec. 3301(b) also added section 6601(f) to clarify the offset provision of section 6402. Section 6601(f) provides: SEC. 6601(f). Satisfaction by C
The section 6654(a) addition to tax is determined by applying the underpayment rate established under -12- section 6621 to the amount of the underpayments for the period of the underpayment.' The addition.to tax is.also calculated with reference to four required installment payments of the taxpayer's estimated income tax.
Interest Netting Before 1987, section 6621 applied the same annual interest rate to overpayments and underpayments.
The section 6654(a) addition to tax is determined by applying:the underpayment rate established under section 6621 to the amount of the underpayments for the period of s"[A]mount of the underpayment" means the excess of the required installment over the amount, if any, of the installment ,paid on or before the due date for the installment.
tax is calculated by applying the section 6621 underpayment interest rate to the amount of the underpayment from the due date of each installment until April 15 following the close of the taxable year .
The addition to .tax is', calculated-by applying the section 6621 underpayment .' interest_ rate- to .,the amount of each- underpayment from the „ due,,.date.
In his notice of objection respondent argues that petitioner is liable for two types of interest: (1) Pursuant to section 6601, interest at the section 6621 underpayment rate for the period October 17, 2005 (the date respondent issued the notice of transferee liability), until petitioner's transferee liability is finally paid; and (2) pursuant to Florida law, interest at rates determined under Fla.
6601(a)-provides : If any amount of tax imposed by this title (whether required to be shown on a return, or to be paid by stamp or by some other method) is not paid on or befor e the last date prescribed for payment, interest on such amount at the underpayment rate established under section 6621 shall be paid for the period from such last date to the date paid.
6601(a)-provides : If any amount of tax imposed by this title (whether required to be shown on a return, or to be paid by stamp or by some other method) is not paid on or befor e the last date prescribed for payment, interest on such amount at the underpayment rate established under section 6621 shall be paid for the period from such last date to the date paid.
ability was in error insofar as it asserted petitioner’s transferee liability to exceed $41,000 plus “statutory interest”. Respondent has not explained whether by “statutory interest” he means anything other than interest at the underpayment rate of sec. 6621, accumulating on the principal of $41,000 from the date of transferee liability. See infra note 18. In some situations Federal law determines the existence and extent of transferee liability. See, e.g., sec. 6324(a)(2), (b). Fla. Stat. Ann.
, that if any amount o f tax imposed by the Code is not paid on or before the last dat e ,[ prescribed-for payment, interest on such amount must be. paid for theperiod from such last date to the; date paid at the ,underpayment rate established under section 6621 . Section I6611;(a) similarly provides that interest must be allowed and paid on,aiy overpayment in respect of any internal revenue tax at the overpayment rate established under section 6621 . Section 6621(d) :provides for the eliminatio
The addition to tax is calculated by applying the section 6621 underpayment rate to the amount of the underpayment from the due date of the particular installment until the 15th day of the 4th month following the close of the taxable year .
provided for interest to be calculated "based on the rate established from time to time by the Secretary of the Treasury" as provided in section 6621 .10 On January 3, 2007, petitioner timely filed a petition with the Court .
] Additionally, even if all of section 6621 is considered because of the cross-reference in section 6601, as petitioner argues, section 6621(d) does not apply a zero interest rate bu t rather provides that the net rate of interest shall be zero on equivalent underpayments and overpayments .
The Court of Appeals rejected the taxpayers' "interesting but ultimately unavailing" argument, finding that the Commissioner was applying section 6621(c), and that the effective date of section 1092 was not determinative of the issue before the court as to the taxpayers' liability for increased interest .
.The parties-further stipulated that-the deficiency was a substantial underpayment -attributable*to tax-motivated transactions (TMT), and thus the related interest was to be calculated by an increased rate pursuant to section 6621(c)-' (before amendment by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of .
OPINION Interest on a Federal income tax deficiency generally accrues at the rate specified by section 6621 from the last date prescribed for payment until the date on which the tax is paid .
Discussion Under section 6601(a), interest on a Federal income tax liability generally accrues at the rate specified by section 6621 from the last date prescribed for payment until the date on which the tax is paid .
Petitioner's offer in effect was that he'would pay the underlying liability and the statutory interest on the deficiency but would not have to pay the negligence additions to tax under section 6653 and tax-motivated interest pursuant to section 6621 .
Section 6621 applied to interest accruing after December 31, 1984, even though the transaction giving rise to the underpayment of tax on which interest accrued was entered into before that date, while section 1092 applied to property acquired and positions established by the taxpayers after June 23, 1981. The taxpayers contended that because their
816, 823-824 (1988) (as a sanction for the Commissioner's failure to timely file an answer, the Court deemed established that the Commissioner erred in determining that additional interest was due under section 6621(.c)); Vermouth v.
In Weiner , the taxpayers challenged the interest charged against them for "tax-motivated transactions" pursuant to section 6621 (c) (now repealed) .
Accordingly, we hold that petitioner did not have re sonable cause for failing to pay her 2002 tax liability when due .
ent provided the requisite notices of the administrative and judicial proceedings with respect to petitioners ' income tax liability for 1984 ; (2) whether petitioners are liable for the increased rate of interest on tax-motivated transactions under section 6621 (c) ;2 (3) whether respondent abused his discretion in failing to abate interest under section 6404 ( e) ; and (4) whether petitioners are liable for the addition to tax under section 6651 (a)(3) .
om the law construing the word “tax” on Form 872-A to include - 12 - interest and penalties. Further, in Estate of Raney v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-684, a Form 872-A was deemed to extend the period of limitations for increased interest under section 6621. Petitioners cite Tolve v. Commissioner, 31 Fed. Appx. 73 (3d Cir. 2002), as authority that the word “tax” does not include interest or penalties. In addition to the fact that Tolve is an unpublished opinion that is not precedential, we fi
ekulsia v. Commissioner, 389 F .3d 601 ( 6th Cir . 2004), that the taxpayer was not entitled to an abatement of interest . Second, the notice states that petitioners never established that their facts did not support the imposition of interest under section 6621 (c) . Third, the notice indicates that petitioners never discussed at the hearing their claim that they were not given an opportunity to be heard during the examination and, hence, that Driver considered that issue to be abandoned . OPIN
6621 was designated subsec. (d). The additional interest applies only after Dec. 31, 1984. Sec. 6621(c) was repealed as of Dec. 31, 1989, by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989, Pub. L. 101-239, sec. 7721(b), 103 Stat. 2399. 3 Respondent reserved relevancy objections to many of the exhibits attached to the stipulations of fact. Fed.
The increased rate of interest under section 6621(c) is 120 percent of the statutory rate imposed on underpayments under section 6601 if the underpayment exceeds $1,000 and is attributable to a tax-motivated transaction (as defined in section 6621 (c)(3)) .
We hold only that the Commissioner's burden of production under section 7491(c) with - 21 - respect to the section 6654 addition to tax requires the Commissioner, at a minimum, to produce evidence that a taxpayer had a required annual payment .under section 6654(d) .
SERVED Jg| 1 7 2006 Because the new statutory language [in section 6621] was enacted as part of the statute that gave effect to the agreements reached at the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations condúcted under the auspices of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade ("GATT"), the lower corporate ·overpayment interest rate of 0.5 percent set forth in the 1994 amendment is referred to as the "
Held: We hold that the GATT rate applies to the accrued interest owed P as of Dec.
Section 6654(a) provides that in the case of an underpayment of estimated tax by an individual, there shall be added to the tax an amount determined by applying the underpayment rate established under section 6621 to the amount of the underpayment for the period of the underpayment.
As petitioners read the above GATT amendment to section 6621(a), the GATT overpayment interest rate reduction does not apply to petitioners' December 31, 1994, overpayment interest balance.
The parties differ not only over the amount owed, that is, the amount of the deficiencies, but also the time the deficiencies should be deemed to have been outstanding (there does appear to be a consensus, with which the Court agrees, that the applicable rates of interest are those prescribed pursuant to section 6621 and set forth most recently in Rev.
Petitioner makes this argument in order to incorporate not simply the provisions of subsection (c)(3)(B) of section 6621 into the operation of section 6621(a)(1), but also subsection (c) (3) (A).
The parties differ not only over the amount owed, that is, the amount of the deficiencies, but also the time the deficiencies should be deemed to have been outstanding (there does appear to be a consensus, with which the Court agrees, that the applicable rates of interest are those prescribed pursuant to section 6621 and set forth most recently in Rev.
The parties differ not only over the amount owed, that is, the amount of the deficiencies, but also the time the deficiencies should be deemed to have been outstanding (there does appear to be a consensus, with which the Court agrees, that the applicable rates of interest are those prescribed pursuant to section 6621 and set forth most recently in Rev.
The parties differ not only over the amount owed, that is, the amount of the deficiencies, but also the time the deficiencies should be deemed to have been outstanding (there does appear to be a consensus, with which the Court agrees, that the applicable rates of interest are those prescribed pursuant to section 6621 and set forth most recently in Rev.
Summers to pay responden $647,749 .86 for unpaid Federal income taxes for years 1985, 1 86, 1988, and 1989 plus interest accruing thereon at the rate p ovided by section 6621 from April 27, 2003, unti l paid.
The parties differ not only over the amount owed, that is, the amount of the deficiencies, but also the time the deficiencies should be deemed to have been outstanding (there does appear to be a consensus, with which the Court agrees, that the applicable rates of interest are those prescribed pursuant to section 6621 and set forth most recently in Rev.
The parties differ not only over the amount owed, that is, the amount of the deficiencies, but also the time the deficiencies should be deemed to have been outstanding (there does appear to be a consensus, with which the Court agrees, that the applicable rates of interest are those prescribed pursuant to section 6621 and set forth most recently in Rev.
The parties differ not only over the amount owed, that is, the amount of the deficiencies, but also the time the deficiencies should be deemed to have been outstanding (there does appear to be a consensus, with which the Court agrees, that the applicable rates of interest are those prescribed pursuant to section 6621 and set forth most recently in Rev.
The parties differ not only over the amount owed, that is, the amount of the deficiencies, but also the time the deficiencies should be deemed to have been outstanding (there does appear to be a consensus, with which the Court agrees, that the applicable rates of interest are those prescribed pursuant to section 6621 and set forth most recently in Rev.
The parties differ not only over the amount owed, that is, the amount of the deficiencies, but also the time the deficiencies should be deemed to have been outstanding (there does appear to be a consensus, with which the Court agrees, that the applicable rates of interest are those prescribed pursuant to section 6621 and set forth most recently in Rev.
The parties differ not only over the amount owed, that is, the amount of the deficiencies, but also the time the deficiencies should be deemed to have been outstanding (there does appear to be a consensus, with which the Court agrees, that the applicable rates of interest are those prescribed pursuant to section 6621 and set forth most recently in Rev.
The parties differ not only over the amount owed, that is, the amount of the deficiencies, but also the time the deficiencies should be deemed to have been outstanding (there does appear to be a consensus, with which the Court agrees, that the applicable rates of interest are those prescribed pursuant to section 6621 and set forth most recently in Rev.
Court agrees, that the applicable rates of interest are those prescribed pursuant to section 6621.and set forth most recently in Rev.
- 3 - Because the new statutory language [in section 6621] was enacted as part of the statute that gave effect to the agreements reached at the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations conducted under the auspices of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (“GATT”), the lower corporate overpayment interest rate of 0.5 percent set forth in the 1994 amendment is referred to as the “G
The parties differ not only over the amount owed, that is, the amount of the deficiencies, but also the time the deficiencies should be deemed to have been outstanding (there does appear to be a consensus, with which the Court agrees, that the applicable rates of interest are those prescribed pursuant to section 6621 and set forth most recently in Rev.
2004), explained: Because the new statutory language [in section 6621] was enacted as part of the statute that gave effect to the agreements reached at the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations conducted under the auspices of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (“GATT”), the lower corporate overpayment interest rate of 0.5 percent set forth in the 1994 amendment is referred to as the “G
Petitioner makes this argument in order to incorporate not simply the provisions of subsection (c)(3)(B) of section 6621 into the operation of section 6621(a)(1), but also subsection (c)(3)(A).
original overpayment on the due date of petitioner’s return relieves the need for any further application of the $10,000 threshold in section 6621(a)(1). Discussion Interest on overpayments is authorized by section 6611(a) at the rate established in section 6621. Section 6622(a) requires that the overpayment interest be compounded daily. The issue before us concerns whether the GATT rate change in corporate overpayment interest applies in computing interest on the interest accrued before the eff
6654(e), and it imposes an addition to tax on an individual who underpays his estimated tax that is calculated with reference to the underpayment rate under section 6621, the underpayment amount, and the underpayment period, see sec.
Section 6654(-a) provides that in the case of an underpayment of estimated tax by an individual, there shall be added to the tax an amount determined by applyi g the underpayment rate established under section 6621.to the amount of the underpayment I for the period of the underpayment.
Section 6654(a) provides that in the case of an underpayment of estimated tax by an individual, there shall be added to the tax an amount determined by applying the underpayment rate established under section 6621 to the amount of the underpayment for the period of the underpayment.
Section 6654(a) provides that in the case of an underpayment of estimated tax by an individual, there shall be added to the tax an amount determined by multiplying the underpayment rate established under section 6621 to the amount of the underpayment for the period of the underpayment.
Section 6654(a) provides that in the case of an underpayment of estimated tax by an individual, there shall be added to the tax an amount determined by applying the underpayment rate established under section 6621 to the amount of the underpayment - 12 - for the period of the underpayment.
ches #1 Ltd. v. Commissioner, 401 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2005), affg. in part, revg. in part, and remanding T.C. Memo. 2003-150, this is not a case where our findings with respect to this matter are alleged to have any bearing on penalty-interest under sec. 6621 or on any other penalties. For instance, respondent has not alleged that an adjustment to SMP’s reported basis in SMHC stock would give rise to any underpayment for purposes of sec. 6662 accuracy-related penalties. -264- have on taxable yea
Adjustments On October 6, 2003, respondent issued a notice of deficiency (notice) for 1982 to petitioner. Respondent determined that petitioner was liable for additions to tax under sections 6653(a)(1) and (2) and 6659, and increased interest under section 6621. In the Form 886-A, Explanation of Items, accompanying the notice, respondent explained that he had adjusted petitioner’s reported basis in the recyclers to zero and disallowed the loss and the investment and business energy credits petit
Petitioner's only arguments concerning this issue were made in the context of her objections to the application of the section 6621 tax motivated interest, an issue that is discussed below.
6,861 1986 4-6-1998 9,697 1987 3-30-1998 319 Respondent prepared an Interest and Penalty Detail Report for each tax year from 1982 through 1987 based on the total amount of income tax assessed and the applicable interest rates determined pursuant to section 6621. Each report shows in detail the computations used to determine the amount of interest on petitioner’s income tax deficiencies. The tax year of each deficiency, the dates during which the interest accrued, and the total amount of interes
for negligence. Petitioner is concerned because she was unaware of the litigation that was going on in this Court. Petitioner argues that respondent's failure to notify her about the deficiency resulted in her incurring extraordinary interest under section 6621. Under the TEFRA procedures, however, the TMP is responsible for giving various notices to the limited partners. See sec. 6223(g). Section 6230(f) expressly states: SEC. 6230(f). Failure of Tax Matters Partner, Etc., To Fulfill Responsib
Accordingly, we hold that petitioner is liable for the additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1) and (2) for the years at issue.
not on deficiencies. See, e.g., secs. 6601, 6611, 6621. There can be an income tax deficiency without an underpayment.12 There can be an underpayment without an income tax deficiency.13 In describing the amendments made by TRA 1986 sections 1511 (to sec. 6621, I.R.C. 1986) and 1512 (to sec. 6601, I.R.C. 1986), the Joint Statement of Managers portion of the conference committee report consistently refers to interest on underpayments or overpayments of tax, and it does not refer to interest on tax
* * * * * * * IRC § 6601(a) provides, that if any amount of the tax imposed by this title is not paid on or before the last date prescribed for payment, interest on the underpay- ment rate established under section 6621 shall be paid for the period from such last date to the date paid.
ts, not on deficiencies. See, e.g., secs. 6601, 6611, 6621. There can be an income tax deficiency without an underpayment. There can be an underpayment without an income tax deficiency. In describing the amendments made by tra 1986 sections 1511 (to sec. 6621, I.R.C. 1986) and 1512 (to sec. 6601, I.R.C. 1986), the Joint Statement of Managers portion of the conference committee report consistently refers to interest on underpayments or overpayments of tax, and it does not refer to interest on tax
We hold that the State tax deficiencies and interest on Federal and State tax deficiencies in issue in the instant case constitute specified liability losses within the meaning of section 172(f).
se the amount assessed by respondent under - 17 - the authority of section 6621(c) is a penalty, not interest. Tax-motivated interest is clearly interest, prescribed in the same manner as all interest--under section 6601(a) at the rate set forth in section 6621. Even if the interest could be considered a “penalty”, it is nonetheless prescribed by section 6601(a) and therefore subject to the same jurisdictional restrictions as regular interest prescribed by section 6601(a). See Pen Coal Corp. v.
r because the amount assessed by respondent under the authority of section 6621(c) is a penalty, not interest. Tax-motivated interest is clearly interest, prescribed in the same manner as all interest--under section 6601(a), at the rate set forth in section 6621. Even if the interest could be considered a “penalty”, it is nonetheless prescribed by section - 17 - 6601(a) and therefore subject to the same jurisdictional restrictions as regular interest prescribed by section 6601(a). See Pen Coal C
In pertinent part, section 6654(a) provides: in the case of any underpayment of estimated tax by an individual, there shall be added to the tax * * * an amount determined by applying-- (1) the underpayment rate established under section 6621, (2) to the amount of the underpayment, (3) for the period of the underpayment.
he claimed deduction must be a liability that arises out of Federal or state law. Both of Plaintiffs losses meet this requirement. The liability for federal income tax deficiency interest arises out of 26 U.S.C. § 6601(a) under a rate established by § 6621. The liability for workers’ compensation payments arises out of various state laws. Second, the claims must arise out of acts or failures to act more than three years earlier. In the case of the workers’ compensation claims, the liability aros
In the case of Lakewood, respondent also determined that it was liable for a 15- percent addition to tax under section 6651(a) for failure to file timely its 1992 Federal income tax return and a section 6621 increased rate of interest on its 1991 deficiency as to interest accruing after July 20, 1995.
2(...continued) underpayment of tax for each taxable year referred to in subparagraph (A) which would result solely from the application of subparagraph (A), and (C) then using the overpayment rate established by section 6621, compounded daily, on the overpayment or underpayment determined under subparagraph (B).
Until such partnership-level proceeding is completed, respondent generally may not assess a deficiency attributable to a - 16 - “partnership item” against any partner. Sec. 6225. Moreover, because the tax treatment of an “affected item” depends upon the partnership-level determination, affected items generally cannot be tried as part of
If there is an underpayment of estimated tax for any of the years in issue, section 6654(a) imposes an addition to tax equal to the interest rate established under section 6621 applied to the amount of the underpayment for the period of the underpayment.
Section 6621(c) Increased Interest With regard to increased interest under section 6621(c), among other arguments, petitioners contend that the temporary regulations under section 6621 that extended increased interest to transactions lacking a profit objective are invalid and that - 8 - imposition against them of increased interest would violate due process of law.1 See sec.
In the case of Lakewood, respondent also determined that it was liable for a 15- percent addition to tax under section 6651(a) for failure to file timely its 1992 Federal income tax return and a section 6621 increased rate of interest on its 1991 deficiency as to interest accruing after July 20, 1995.
Copies of those returns are not (continued...) - 26 - section 6621 regarding additional interest would apply to that taxable year.
Copies of those returns are not (continued...) - 26 - section 6621 regarding additional interest would apply to that taxable year.
and costs instead of the estimated contract price and costs, (B) second, determining (solely for purposes of computing such interest) the overpayment or underpayment of tax for each taxable year referred to in subparagraph (A) which would result solely from the application of subparagraph (A), and (C) then using the overpayment rate established by section 6621, compounded daily, on the overpayment or underpayment determined under subparagraph (B).
In the case of Lakewood, respondent also determined that it was liable for a 15-percent addition to tax under section 6651(a) for failure to file timely its 1992 Federal income tax return and a section 6621 increased rate of interest on its 1991 deficiency as to interest accruing after July 20, 1995.
Petitioners further assert that a plain reading of the applicable provisions leads to the conclusion that the amounts that they owe pursuant to section 6621(c), an item that is tied directly to the rate of interest under section 6621, will be substantially reduced when computed pursuant to the interest-netting rule.
Until such partnership-level proceeding is completed, respondent generally may not assess a deficiency attributable to a “partnership item” against any partner. Sec. 6225. Moreover, because the tax treatment of an “affected item” depends upon the partnership-level determination, affected items generally cannot be tried as part of a partn
"Congress decided that no longer would a - 5 - partner's tax liability be determined uniquely but 'the tax treatment of any partnership item [would] be determined at the partnership level.'" Maxwell v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 783, 787 (1986) (citing section 6621). Pursuant to section 6226(b)(1), any notice partner may file a petition "within 60 days after the close of the 90-day period set forth in subsection (a)". Subsection (a) of section 6226 states in pertinent part: (a) Petition by Tax Matte
ng nontest case petitioners that the Commissioner would settle their cases on a basis "consistent with the original project settlement offer that was extended to Kersting investors before the trial of the test cases": A 7-percent reduction of the deficiency, elimination of all additions to tax, and interest imposed at the normal rate prescribed in section 6621; the burnout feature was not provided for.
ng nontest case petitioners that the Commissioner would settle their cases on a basis "consistent with the original project settlement offer that was extended to Kersting investors before the trial of the test cases": A 7-percent reduction of the deficiency, elimination of all additions to tax, and interest imposed at the normal rate prescribed in section 6621; the burnout feature was not provided for.
With respect to increased interest under section 6621, petitioners present no argument as to why the provision should not apply, other than contending that petitioner is at risk and, therefore, not liable for increased interest pursuant to section 6621.
20219-91 1984 $827,955 $41,397.75 $206,988.75 -- 21555-91 1987 195,498 9,774.90 48,874.50 -- 16164-92 1988 109,048 5,452.00 27,262.00 -- 7557-93 1989 109,049 -- .-- $21,810 In the following cases, respondent determin d in the notices of deficiency or asserted in amended answers that the underpayments in tax were subject to increased i terest under section 6621 (c) , formerly section 6621 (d) :4 Investment Research Associatesr Ltd., and Subsidiaries: Docket No.
(6) Whether petitioner is liable for increased interest on substantial underpayments attributable to tax-motivated transactions under section 6621 for 1984.
During the period 1982 through 1993, interest rates under section 6621 ranged as follows from a high of 20 percent in 1982 to a low of 7 percent in 1993: Interest rates under section 6621 were 20 percent in 1982, 10 percent in 1986, 8 percent in 1987, 10 percent in 1990, 9 percent in 1991, 8 percent in 1992, and 7 percent in 1993.
ng nontest case petitioners that the Commissioner would settle their cases on a basis "consistent with the original project settlement offer that was extended to Kersting investors before the trial of the test cases": A 7-percent reduction of the deficiency, elimination of all additions to tax, and interest imposed at the normal rate prescribed in section 6621; the burnout feature was not provided for.
- 6 - Section 6654(a) imposes an addition to tax equal to the amount of the underpayment multiplied by the underpayment rate established under section 6621 for the period of the underpayment.
ng nontest case petitioners that the Commissioner would settle their cases on a basis "consistent with the original project settlement offer that was extended to Kersting investors before the trial of the test cases": A 7-percent reduction of the deficiency, elimination of all additions to tax, and interest imposed at the normal rate prescribed in section 6621; the burnout feature was not provided for.
ng nontest case petitioners that the Commissioner would settle their cases on a basis "consistent with the original project settlement offer that was extended to Kersting investors before the trial of the test cases": A 7-percent reduction of the deficiency, elimination of all additions to tax, and interest imposed at the normal rate prescribed in section 6621; the burnout feature was not provided for.
The amount of this addition to tax is equal to the amount of the underpayment multiplied by the underpayment rate established under section 6621 for the period of the underpayment.
36,601 10,980 --- $1,830 50% of the interest due on $36,601 1 1982 4,602 1,381 230 50% of the interest due on $4,602 Respondent also determined that, pursuant to section 6621, interest on substantial underpayments attributable to tax- motivated t ansactions for the taxable years 1980, 1981, and 1982 would be 120 percent of the adjusted rate.
All of the positions in the Merit T-bill and T-bond options, as well as the stock forwards, constitute "straddles" within the meaning of section 6621 (c) (3) (A) (iii) .
Section 6654(a) imposes an addition to tax equal to the amount of the underpayment multiplied by the underpayment rate established under section 6621 for the period of the underpayment.
understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.10 Petitioners assert that the Plastics Recycling 9 In their motion for decision, petitioners state: "After the lea
nderstatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.32 Petitioners assert that the Plastics Recycling project settlement offer was extended to them, but they do not cla
understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement 22 In each of their motions for decision, petitioners state: "After the lead counsel for taxpayers and Respondent had agreed upon the designation of the lead cases, Respondent's counsel prepared
id. (5) Whether, in 1989, petitioner Murphy owned a 9.53- percent interest or a 50-percent interest in Lone Star. We hold that Murphy owned a 9.53-percent interest in Lone Star in 1989. (6) Whether petitioners are liable for increased interest under section 6621. We hold that they are not. (7) Whether petitioner Sands is liable for additions to tax for negligence under section 6653(a)(1) and (2) for the taxable 2(...continued) refer to this section as sec. 6621(c). The annual rate of interest un
understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement 22 In each of their motions for decision, petitioners state: "After the lead counsel for taxpayers and Respondent had agreed upon the designation of the lead cases, Respondent's counsel prepared
id. (5) Whether, in 1989, petitioner Murphy owned a 9.53- percent interest or a 50-percent interest in Lone Star. We hold that Murphy owned a 9.53-percent interest in Lone Star in 1989. (6) Whether petitioners are liable for increased interest under section 6621. We hold that they are not. (7) Whether petitioner Sands is liable for additions to tax for negligence under section 6653(a)(1) and (2) for the taxable 2(...continued) refer to this section as sec. 6621(c). The annual rate of interest un
nderstatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.32 Petitioners assert that the Plastics Recycling project settlement offer was extended to them, but they do not cla
nderstatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.32 Petitioners assert that the Plastics Recycling project settlement offer was extended to them, but they do not cla
understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement 22 In each of their motions for decision, petitioners state: "After the lead counsel for taxpayers and Respondent had agreed upon the designation of the lead cases, Respondent's counsel prepared
nderstatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.32 Petitioners assert that the Plastics Recycling project settlement offer was extended to them, but they do not cla
understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement 22 In each of their motions for decision, petitioners state: "After the lead counsel for taxpayers and Respondent had agreed upon the designation of the lead cases, Respondent's counsel prepared
nderstatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.32 Petitioners assert that the Plastics Recycling project settlement offer was extended to them, but they do not cla
We disagree with petitioners' contentions.
- 24 - (1) the underpayment rate established under section 6621, (2) to the amount of the underpayment, (3) for the period of the underpayment.
6621 $384.30 50% of the interest $768.60 120% of the due on $7,686 adjusted rate This matter is before us on the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Entry of Decision and Petitioners' Motion for Leave to File Amendment to Petition. Petitioners, Mayer and Ninette Stiskin, are husband and wife. They resided in New York, New York, a
e year(s) of investment to the extent of loss claimed; (2) Government concession of the substantial understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.
- 11 - under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.
- 50 - The addition is imposed at the rate determined by section 6621.21 Imposition of the tax is mandatory where prepayments of the tax, either through withholding or by making estimated quarterly payments, do not satisfy the specified percentages of total liability required under the statute.
e year(s) of investment to the extent of loss claimed; (2) Government concession of the substantial understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.
understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.20 Petitioners assert that the Plastics Recycling project settlement offer was extended to them, but they do not 19
understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.20 Petitioners assert that the Plastics Recycling project settlement offer was extended to them, but they do not 19
understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.20 Petitioners assert that the Plastics Recycling project settlement offer was extended to them, but they do not 19
understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.17 Petitioners assert that the Plastics Recycling project settlement offer was extended to them, but they did not a
* We have also reconsidered whether petitioner is liable for the additions to tax determined by respondent under secs. 6651(a)(1), 6653(a)(1) and (2), 6653(a)(1)(A) and (B), and 6661, and whether he is liable for the increased rate of interest under sec. 6621. In light of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s opinion, we conclude that petitioner’s reporting position with respect to his store was not unreasonable. Accordingly, we hold that he is not liable for the additions to tax for neg
nderstatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.19 Petitioners assert that the Plastics Recycling project settlement offer was extended to them, but they do not cla
- 50 - The addition is imposed at the rate determined by section 6621.21 Imposition of the tax is mandatory where prepayments of the tax, either through withholding or by making estimated quarterly payments, do not satisfy the specified percentages of total liability required under the statute.
e year(s) of investment to the extent of loss claimed; (2) Government concession of the substantial understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.
e year(s) of investment to the extent of loss claimed; (2) Government concession of the substantial understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.
nderstatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.19 Petitioners assert that the Plastics Recycling project settlement offer was extended to them, but they do not cla
e year(s) of investment to the extent of loss claimed; (2) Government concession of the substantial understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.
understatement of tax penalties under section 6661 and the negligence additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2); (3) taxpayer concession of the section 6659 addition to tax for valuation overstatement and the increased rate of interest under section 6621; and (4) execution of a closing agreement (Form 906) stating the settlement and resolving the entire matter for all years.17 Petitioners assert that the Plastics Recycling project settlement offer was extended to them, but they did not a
The amount of the addition is determined by applying — • (1) the underpayment rate established under section 6621, (2) to the amount of the underpayment, (3) for the period of the underpayment.
Section 6601(a) provides the general rule that interest will be imposed at the rate established under section 6621 on any tax that is not paid on or before the last date prescribed for payment.