§6622 — Interest compounded daily

15 cases·6 followed·9 cited40% support

(a)General rule

In computing the amount of any interest required to be paid under this title or sections 1961(c)(1) or 2411 of title 28, United States Code, by the Secretary or by the taxpayer, or any other amount determined by reference to such amount of interest, such interest and such amount shall be compounded daily.

(b)Exception for penalty for failure to file estimated tax

Subsection (a) shall not apply for purposes of computing the amount of any addition to tax under section 6654 or 6655.

  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6622-1 Interest compounded daily
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6622-1(a) General rule.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6622-1(b) Exception.
  • Treas. Reg. §Treas. Reg. §301.6622-1(c) Applicability to unpaid amounts on December 31, 1982—(1) In general.

15 Citing Cases

Section 6622 provides that in computing the amount of interest required to be paid under section 6611, the interest will be compounded daily.

Section 6622 provides that in computing the amount .of interest required to be paid under section 6611, the interest will be compounded daily. . Section 6621 provides that the rate of interest to be paid by_ respondent to corporate taxpayers on overpayments shall be the·sum of the Federal short-term interest rate, as calculated according to the for

Section 6622 provides that in computing the amount of interest required to be paid under section 6611, the interest will be compounded daily. Section 6621 provides that the rate of interest to be paid by respondent to corporate taxpayers on overpayments shall be the sum of the Federal short-term interest rate, as calculated according to the formula

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Commissioner 126 T.C. 36 · 2006

Section 6622 provides that in computing the amount of interest required to be paid under section 6611, the interest will be compounded daily. Section 6621 provides that the rate of interest to be paid by respondent to corporate taxpayers on overpayments shall be the sum of the Federal short-term interest rate, as calculated according to the formula

Dolores Nelson, Petitioner T.C. Memo. 2004-34 · 2004

issioner, supra. There can be no abuse of discretion by the Commissioner for failure to abate interest if the statute that applies does not give the Commissioner discretion to abate the interest. Interest on the interest compounds daily pursuant to section 6622. The interest accruing from May 1, 1999, to the date of payment was not caused by any delay by the Internal Revenue Service, is authorized by statute, and is due and owing from petitioner. The failure to abate that interest was not an abu

y paid thejoint income tax deficiencies that were determined in the prior tax court decision. Regarding the Income Tax accounts, you now owe only penalties under IRC§ 6651(a)(2) and interest due under IRC §6601(a) & (b), IRC§6621(a)(2) [sic] and IRC§6622 [sic]. You have fully paid the IRC 6663(a) [sic] penalty amounts and now owe only interest due under IRC §6601(a) & (b), IRC§6621(a)(2) [sic] and IRC§6622 [sic]. You have claimed IRS should not collect any interest on the deficien- cies as deter

6611 requires us to reject GE’s theory of the case”. Id. at 1311-1312. As we shall discuss, petitioner believes this analysis by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is flawed because “overpayment” does not include interest compounded under section 6622. Petitioner challenges the holding of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by arguing that the phrase “overpayment of tax” in section 6621(a) limits the scope of the change in corporate interest rates to the overpayment itself, t

6611 requires us to reject GE’s theory of the case”. Id. at 1311-1312. As we shall discuss, petitioner believes this analysis by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is flawed because “overpayment” does not include interest compounded under section 6622. Petitioner challenges the holding of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by arguing that the phrase “overpayment of tax” in section 6621(a) limits the scope of the change in corporate interest rates to the overpayment itself, t

Poinier v. Commissioner 96 T.C. 1 · 1991
United States v. Sarubin 507 F.3d 811 · Cir.
United States v. Finley Hilliard 798 F.3d 296 · Cir.
Host Marriott v. United States · Cir.
Exxon Mobil Corp. & Affiliated Companies v. Commissioner 484 F.3d 731 · Cir.
Host Marriott Corporation v. United States of America, Manufacturers Alliance/mapi Incorporated, Amicus Curiae 267 F.3d 363 · Cir.
United States v. Barbara Coney 689 F.3d 365 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.