§683 — Use of trust as an exchange fund

10 citing cases

(a)General rule

Except as provided in subsection (b), if property is transferred to a trust in exchange for an interest in other trust property and if the trust would be an investment company (within the meaning of section 351) if it were a corporation, then gain shall be recognized to the transferor.

(b)Exception for pooled income funds

Subsection (a) shall not apply to any transfer to a pooled income fund (within the meaning of section 642(c)(5)).

  • Treas. Reg. §1.683-1Applicability of provisions; general rule Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Part I (section 641 and following), subchapter J, chapter 1 of the Code, applies to estates and trusts and to beneficiaries only with respect to taxable years which begin after December 31, 1953, and end after August 16, 1954 the date of enactment of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. In the case of an estate or trust, the date on which a trust is created or amended or on which an estate commences, and the taxable years of beneficiaries, grantors, or decedents concerned are immaterial. This provision applies equally to taxable years of normal and of abbreviated length.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.683-2Exceptions Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) In the case of any beneficiary of an estate or trust, sections 641 through 682 do not apply to any amount paid, credited, or to be distributed by an estate or trust in any taxable year of the estate or trust which begins before January 1, 1954, or which ends before August 17, 1954. Whether an amount so paid, credited, or to be distributed is to be included in the gross income of a beneficiary is determined with reference to the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. Thus, if a trust in its fiscal year ending June 30, 1954, distributed its current income to a beneficiary on June 30, 1954, the extent to which the distribution is includible in the beneficiary's gross income for his taxable year (the calendar year 1954) and the character of such income will be determined under the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. The Internal Revenue Code of 1954, however, determines the beneficiary's tax liability for a taxable year of the beneficiary to which such Code applies, with respect even to gross income of the beneficiary determined under the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 in accordance with this paragraph. Accordingly, the beneficiary is allowed credits and deductions pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 for a taxable year governed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. See subparagraph (ii) of example (1) in paragraph (c) of this section.

    (b) For purposes of determining the time of receipt of dividends under sections 34 (for purposes of the credit for dividends received on or before December 31, 1964) and 116, the dividends paid, credited, or to be distributed to a beneficiary are deemed to have been received by the beneficiary ratably on the same dates that the dividends were received by the estate or trust.

    (c) The application of this section may be illustrated by the following examples:

  • Treas. Reg. §1.683-2(a)In the case of any beneficiary of an estate or trust, sections 641 through 682 do not apply to any amount paid, credited, or to be distributed by an estate or trust in any taxable year of the estate or trust which begins before January 1, 1954, or which ends before August 17, 1954. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    In the case of any beneficiary of an estate or trust, sections 641 through 682 do not apply to any amount paid, credited, or to be distributed by an estate or trust in any taxable year of the estate or trust which begins before January 1, 1954, or which ends before August 17, 1954. Whether an amount so paid, credited, or to be distributed is to be included in the gross income of a beneficiary is determined with reference to the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. Thus, if a trust in its fiscal year ending June 30, 1954, distributed its current income to a beneficiary on June 30, 1954, the extent to which the distribution is includible in the beneficiary's gross income for his taxable year (the calendar year 1954) and the character of such income will be determined under the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. The Internal Revenue Code of 1954, however, determines the beneficiary's tax liability for a taxable year of the beneficiary to which such Code applies, with respect even to gross income of the beneficiary determined under the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 in accordance with this paragraph. Accordingly, the beneficiary is allowed credits and deductions pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 for a taxable year governed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. See subparagraph (ii) of example (1) in paragraph (c) of this section.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.683-2(b)For purposes of determining the time of receipt of dividends under sections 34 (for purposes of the credit for dividends received on or before December 31, 1964) and 116, the dividends paid, credited, or to be distributed to a beneficiary are deemed to have been received by the beneficiary ratably on the same dates that the dividends were received by the estate or trust. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    For purposes of determining the time of receipt of dividends under sections 34 (for purposes of the credit for dividends received on or before December 31, 1964) and 116, the dividends paid, credited, or to be distributed to a beneficiary are deemed to have been received by the beneficiary ratably on the same dates that the dividends were received by the estate or trust.

  • Treas. Reg. §1.683-2(c)§1.683-2(c) Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    The application of this section may be illustrated by the following examples:

  • Treas. Reg. §1.683-3Application of the 65-day rule of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    If an amount is paid, credited, or to be distributed in the first 65 days of the first taxable year of an estate or trust (heretofore subject to the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939) to which the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 applies and the amount would be treated, if the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 were applicable, as if paid, credited, or to be distributed on the last day of the preceding taxable year, sections 641 through 682 do not apply to the amount. The amount so paid, credited, or to be distributed is taken into account as provided in the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. See 26 CFR (1939) 39.162-2 (c) and (d) (Regulations 118).

10 Citing Cases

Ung v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2013-126 · 2013

683, the legal title owner] may convey the legal title to himselfand another as he is the sole owner ofwhat he conveys, i.e. the legal title." Lowenthal v. Kuntz, 231 P.2d 62, 64 (Cal. App. 2d 1951). Petitioner is not the legal title owner and has failed to prove that she is an equitable title owner. The Kam Court property deed lists only peti

ommerce, 472 U.S. 713, 722. (1985); Aquilino v. United States, 363 U.S. 509, 513 (1960). The pertinent -California statutory provision defining a joint tenancy and describing the method of its creation, Cal. Civ. Code sec: 683 (West 2007), provides: § 683. Joint tenancy; definition; method of creation (a) A joint interest is one owned by two or more persons in equal shares, by a title created by a single will or transfer, when expressly declared in the will or transfer to be a joint tenancy, or

683 (West 1984). 3 Community property is defined as "property acquired by husband and wife, or either, during marriage, when not acquired as the separate property of either." Cal. Civ. Code sec. 687 (West 1982). - 8 - Under California law, property acquired by spouses during wedlock is statutorily presumed to be community property. Cal. Civ.

683 (West 1984).] Community property is defined as “property acquired by husband and wife, or either, during marriage, when not acquired as the separate property of either.” Cal. Civ. Code sec. 687 (West 1982). California Civ. Code sec. 5110.710 (West 1983) was repealed in 1993, but it was continued in California Fam. Code sec. 850(b) (West 19

Wells v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1995-537 · 1995

equirement which enables courts to validate transmutations without resort to extrinsic evidence and, thus, without encouraging perjury and the proliferation of litigation. Third, it is consistent with our interpretation of the similar requirement in section 683. [Id. at 918; fn. ref. omitted.6] 6 In this allusion to California Civil Code sec. 683, the California Supreme Court is referring to California Trust Co. v. (continued...) - 11 - Although the writing need not contain the words "transmutat

Bridges v. Commissioner 64 T.C. 968 · 1975
Estate of McNary v. Commissioner 47 T.C. 467 · 1967
Flitcroft v. Commissioner 39 T.C. 52 · 1962
Kroshnyi v. U.S. Pack Courier Services, Inc. · Cir.
Kroshnyi v. U.S. Pack Courier Services, Inc. 771 F.3d 93 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.