§6861 — Jeopardy assessments of income, estate, gift, and certain excise taxes

63 citing cases

(a)Authority for making

If the Secretary believes that the assessment or collection of a deficiency, as defined in section 6211, will be jeopardized by delay, he shall, notwithstanding the provisions of section 6213(a), immediately assess such deficiency (together with all interest, additional amounts, and additions to the tax provided for by law), and notice and demand shall be made by the Secretary for the payment thereof.

(b)Deficiency letters

If the jeopardy assessment is made before any notice in respect of the tax to which the jeopardy assessment relates has been mailed under section 6212(a), then the Secretary shall mail a notice under such subsection within 60 days after the making of the assessment.

(c)Amount assessable before decision of Tax Court

The jeopardy assessment may be made in respect of a deficiency greater or less than that notice of which has been mailed to the taxpayer, despite the provisions of section 6212(c) prohibiting the determination of additional deficiencies, and whether or not the taxpayer has theretofore filed a petition with the Tax Court. The Secretary may, at any time before the decision of the Tax Court is rendered, abate such assessment, or any unpaid portion thereof, to the extent that he believes the assessment to be excessive in amount. The Secretary shall notify the Tax Court of the amount of such assessment, or abatement, if the petition is filed with the Tax Court before the making of the assessment or is subsequently filed, and the Tax Court shall have jurisdiction to redetermine the entire amount of the deficiency and of all amounts assessed at the same time in connection therewith.

(d)Amount assessable after decision of Tax Court

If the jeopardy assessment is made after the decision of the Tax Court is rendered, such assessment may be made only in respect of the deficiency determined by the Tax Court in its decision.

(e)Expiration of right to assess

A jeopardy assessment may not be made after the decision of the Tax Court has become final or after the taxpayer has filed a petition for review of the decision of the Tax Court.

(f)Collection of unpaid amounts

When the petition has been filed with the Tax Court and when the amount which should have been assessed has been determined by a decision of the Tax Court which has become final, then any unpaid portion, the collection of which has been stayed by bond as provided in section 6863(b) shall be collected as part of the tax upon notice and demand from the Secretary, and any remaining portion of the assessment shall be abated. If the amount already collected exceeds the amount determined as the amount which should have been assessed, such excess shall be credited or refunded to the taxpayer as provided in section 6402, without the filing of claim therefor. If the amount determined as the amount which should have been assessed is greater than the amount actually assessed, then the difference shall be assessed and shall be collected as part of the tax upon notice and demand from the Secretary.

(g)Abatement if jeopardy does not exist

The Secretary may abate the jeopardy assessment if he finds that jeopardy does not exist. Such abatement may not be made after a decision of the Tax Court in respect of the deficiency has been rendered or, if no petition is filed with the Tax Court, after the expiration of the period for filing such petition. The period of limitation on the making of assessments and levy or a proceeding in court for collection, in respect of any deficiency, shall be determined as if the jeopardy assessment so abated had not been made, except that the running of such period shall in any event be suspended for the period from the date of such jeopardy assessment until the expiration of the 10th day after the day on which such jeopardy assessment is abated.

(h)Cross references
(1)

For the effect of the furnishing of security for payment, see section 6863.

(2)

For provision permitting immediate levy in case of jeopardy, see section 6331(a).

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6861-1Jeopardy assessments of income, estate, gift, and certain excise taxes Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    (a) Authority for making. If a district director or director of a service center believes that the assessment or collection of a deficiency in income, estate, gift, or chapter 41, 42, 43, or 44 tax will be jeopardized by delay, then the director is required to assess such deficiency immediately, together with the interest, additional amounts, and additions to the tax provided by law. A district director will make an assessment under this section if collection is determined to be in jeopardy because at least one of the conditions described in § 1.6851-1(a)(1) (i), (ii), or (iii) (relating to termination assessments) exists. A jeopardy assessment may be made before or after the mailing of the notice of deficiency provided by section 6212. However, a jeopardy assessment for a taxable year under section 6861 cannot be made after a decision of the Tax Court with respect to such taxable year has become final (see section 7481) or after the taxpayer has filed a petition for review of the decision of the Tax Court with respect to such taxable year. In the case of a deficiency determined by a decision of the Tax Court which has become final or with respect to which the taxpayer has filed a petition for review and has not filed a bond as provided in section 7485, assessment may be made in accordance with the provisions of section 6215, without regard to section 6861.

    (b) Amount of jeopardy assessment. If a notice of a deficiency is mailed to the taxpayer before it is discovered that delay would jeopardize the assessment or collection of the tax, a jeopardy assessment may be made in an amount greater or less than that included in the deficiency notice. If a deficiency is assessed on account of jeopardy after the decision of the Tax Court is rendered, the jeopardy assessment may be made only with respect to the deficiency determined by the Tax Court.

    (c) Jurisdiction of Tax Court. If the jeopardy assessment is made before the notice in respect of the tax to which the jeopardy assessment relates has been mailed pursuant to section 6212(a), the district director shall, within 60 days after the making of the assessment, send the taxpayer a notice of deficiency pursuant to such subsection. The taxpayer may file a petition with the Tax Court for a redetermination of the amount of the deficiency within the time prescribed in section 6213(a). If the petition of the taxpayer is filed with the Tax Court, either before or after the making of the jeopardy assessment, the Commissioner, through his counsel, is required to notify the Tax Court of such assessment or of any abatement thereof, and the Tax Court has jurisdiction to redetermine the amount of the deficiency, together with all other amounts assessed at the same time in connection therewith.

    (d) Payment and collection of jeopardy assessment. After a jeopardy assessment has been made, the district director is required to send notice and demand to the taxpayer for the amount of the jeopardy assessment. Regardless of whether the taxpayer has filed a petition with the Tax Court, he is required to make payment of the amount of such assessment (to the extent that it has not been abated) within 10 days after the sending of notice and demand by the district director, unless before the expiration of such 10-day period he files with the district director a bond as provided in section 6863. Section 6331 provides that, if the district director makes a finding that the collection of the tax is in jeopardy, he may make demand for immediate payment of the amount of the jeopardy assessment and, in such case, the taxpayer shall immediately pay such amount or shall immediately file the bond provided in section 6863. If a petition is not filed with the Tax Court within the period prescribed in section 6213(a), the district director will be so advised, and, if collection of the deficiency has been stayed by the timely filing of a bond as provided in section 6863, he should then give notice and make demand for payment of the amount assessed plus interest. After the Tax Court has rendered its decision and such decision has become final, the district director will be notified of the action taken. He will then send notice and demand for payment of the unpaid portion of the amount determined by the Tax Court, the collection of which has been stayed by the bond. If the amount of the jeopardy assessment is less than the amount determined by the Tax Court, the difference will be assessed and collected as part of the tax upon the issuance of a notice and demand therefor. If the amount of the jeopardy assessment is in excess of the amount determined by the Tax Court, the unpaid portion of such excess will be abated. If any part of the excess amount has been paid, it will be credited or refunded to the taxpayer as provided in section 6402, without the filing of claim therefor.

    (e) Abatement of excessive assessment. The district director or the director of the regional service center may, at any time before the decision of the Tax Court is rendered, abate a jeopardy assessment in whole or in part if the district director believes that such assessment is excessive in amount.

    (f) Abatement if jeopardy does not exist. (1) The district director or the director of the regional service center may abate a jeopardy assessment in whole or in part, if it is shown to the satisfaction of the district director that jeopardy does not exist. An abatement may not be made under this paragraph after a decision of the Tax Court in respect of the deficiency has been rendered or, if no petition is filed with such court, after the expiration of the period for filing such petition.

    (2) After abatement of a jeopardy assessment in whole or in part, a deficiency may be assessed and collected in the manner authorized by law as if the jeopardy assessment or part thereof so abated had not existed. If a notice of deficiency has been sent to the taxpayer before the abatement of the jeopardy assessment in whole or in part, whether such notice was sent before or after the making of the assessment, such abatement will not affect the validity of the notice or of any proceedings for redetermination based thereon. The period of limitation on the making of assessments and the beginning of levy or a proceeding in court for collection in respect of any deficiency shall be determined as if the jeopardy assessment so abated had not been made, except that the running of such period shall in any event be suspended for the period from the date of such jeopardy assessment until the expiration of the tenth day after the date on which such jeopardy assessment is abated in whole or in part. The provisions of this subparagraph may be illustrated by the following example:

    (3) See section 7429 with respect to requesting the district director to review the making of the jeopardy assessment.

    (g) Special rules for chapters 42 and 43 taxes. For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the amount of a deficiency with respect to any tax imposed by section 4941(a), 4942(a), 4943(a), 4944(a), 4945(a), 4951(a), 4952(a), 4955(a), 4971(a) or 4975(a) shall include the amount of additional tax imposed by section 4941(b), 4942(b), 4943(b), 4944(b), 4945(b), 4951(b), 4952(b), 4955(b), 4971(b) or 4975(b) for failure to correct the act (or failure to act) which gave rise to liability for the initial tax.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6861-1(a)Authority for making. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Authority for making. If a district director or director of a service center believes that the assessment or collection of a deficiency in income, estate, gift, or chapter 41, 42, 43, or 44 tax will be jeopardized by delay, then the director is required to assess such deficiency immediately, together with the interest, additional amounts, and additions to the tax provided by law. A district director will make an assessment under this section if collection is determined to be in jeopardy because at least one of the conditions described in § 1.6851-1(a)(1) (i), (ii), or (iii) (relating to termination assessments) exists. A jeopardy assessment may be made before or after the mailing of the notice of deficiency provided by section 6212. However, a jeopardy assessment for a taxable year under section 6861 cannot be made after a decision of the Tax Court with respect to such taxable year has become final (see section 7481) or after the taxpayer has filed a petition for review of the decision of the Tax Court with respect to such taxable year. In the case of a deficiency determined by a decision of the Tax Court which has become final or with respect to which the taxpayer has filed a petition for review and has not filed a bond as provided in section 7485, assessment may be made in accordance with the provisions of section 6215, without regard to section 6861.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6861-1(b)Amount of jeopardy assessment. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Amount of jeopardy assessment. If a notice of a deficiency is mailed to the taxpayer before it is discovered that delay would jeopardize the assessment or collection of the tax, a jeopardy assessment may be made in an amount greater or less than that included in the deficiency notice. If a deficiency is assessed on account of jeopardy after the decision of the Tax Court is rendered, the jeopardy assessment may be made only with respect to the deficiency determined by the Tax Court.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6861-1(c)Jurisdiction of Tax Court. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Jurisdiction of Tax Court. If the jeopardy assessment is made before the notice in respect of the tax to which the jeopardy assessment relates has been mailed pursuant to section 6212(a), the district director shall, within 60 days after the making of the assessment, send the taxpayer a notice of deficiency pursuant to such subsection. The taxpayer may file a petition with the Tax Court for a redetermination of the amount of the deficiency within the time prescribed in section 6213(a). If the petition of the taxpayer is filed with the Tax Court, either before or after the making of the jeopardy assessment, the Commissioner, through his counsel, is required to notify the Tax Court of such assessment or of any abatement thereof, and the Tax Court has jurisdiction to redetermine the amount of the deficiency, together with all other amounts assessed at the same time in connection therewith.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6861-1(d)Payment and collection of jeopardy assessment. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Payment and collection of jeopardy assessment. After a jeopardy assessment has been made, the district director is required to send notice and demand to the taxpayer for the amount of the jeopardy assessment. Regardless of whether the taxpayer has filed a petition with the Tax Court, he is required to make payment of the amount of such assessment (to the extent that it has not been abated) within 10 days after the sending of notice and demand by the district director, unless before the expiration of such 10-day period he files with the district director a bond as provided in section 6863. Section 6331 provides that, if the district director makes a finding that the collection of the tax is in jeopardy, he may make demand for immediate payment of the amount of the jeopardy assessment and, in such case, the taxpayer shall immediately pay such amount or shall immediately file the bond provided in section 6863. If a petition is not filed with the Tax Court within the period prescribed in section 6213(a), the district director will be so advised, and, if collection of the deficiency has been stayed by the timely filing of a bond as provided in section 6863, he should then give notice and make demand for payment of the amount assessed plus interest. After the Tax Court has rendered its decision and such decision has become final, the district director will be notified of the action taken. He will then send notice and demand for payment of the unpaid portion of the amount determined by the Tax Court, the collection of which has been stayed by the bond. If the amount of the jeopardy assessment is less than the amount determined by the Tax Court, the difference will be assessed and collected as part of the tax upon the issuance of a notice and demand therefor. If the amount of the jeopardy assessment is in excess of the amount determined by the Tax Court, the unpaid portion of such excess will be abated. If any part of the excess amount has been paid, it will be credited or refunded to the taxpayer as provided in section 6402, without the filing of claim therefor.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6861-1(e)Abatement of excessive assessment. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Abatement of excessive assessment. The district director or the director of the regional service center may, at any time before the decision of the Tax Court is rendered, abate a jeopardy assessment in whole or in part if the district director believes that such assessment is excessive in amount.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6861-1(f)Abatement if jeopardy does not exist. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Abatement if jeopardy does not exist. (1) The district director or the director of the regional service center may abate a jeopardy assessment in whole or in part, if it is shown to the satisfaction of the district director that jeopardy does not exist. An abatement may not be made under this paragraph after a decision of the Tax Court in respect of the deficiency has been rendered or, if no petition is filed with such court, after the expiration of the period for filing such petition.

    (2) After abatement of a jeopardy assessment in whole or in part, a deficiency may be assessed and collected in the manner authorized by law as if the jeopardy assessment or part thereof so abated had not existed. If a notice of deficiency has been sent to the taxpayer before the abatement of the jeopardy assessment in whole or in part, whether such notice was sent before or after the making of the assessment, such abatement will not affect the validity of the notice or of any proceedings for redetermination based thereon. The period of limitation on the making of assessments and the beginning of levy or a proceeding in court for collection in respect of any deficiency shall be determined as if the jeopardy assessment so abated had not been made, except that the running of such period shall in any event be suspended for the period from the date of such jeopardy assessment until the expiration of the tenth day after the date on which such jeopardy assessment is abated in whole or in part. The provisions of this subparagraph may be illustrated by the following example:

    (3) See section 7429 with respect to requesting the district director to review the making of the jeopardy assessment.

  • Treas. Reg. §301.6861-1(g)Special rules for chapters 42 and 43 taxes. Show full text ▾ Collapse ▴

    Special rules for chapters 42 and 43 taxes. For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the amount of a deficiency with respect to any tax imposed by section 4941(a), 4942(a), 4943(a), 4944(a), 4945(a), 4951(a), 4952(a), 4955(a), 4971(a) or 4975(a) shall include the amount of additional tax imposed by section 4941(b), 4942(b), 4943(b), 4944(b), 4945(b), 4951(b), 4952(b), 4955(b), 4971(b) or 4975(b) for failure to correct the act (or failure to act) which gave rise to liability for the initial tax.

63 Citing Cases

9 [*9] On March 26, 2018, the IRS made a jeopardy assessment against the estate pursuant to section 6861.

But section 6213(a) makes an exception for “jeopardy assessments” under section 6861, and that section authorizes the 10 [*10] Commissioner to assess a deficiency even before issuing a notice of deficiency if he believes the assessment or its collection will be jeopardized by delay.

ource derived.” I.R.C. § 61(a); see also Treas. Reg. § 1.61-1(a) (“Gross income 10 Amounts are considered “previously assessed” only if the IRS assessed those amounts before the taxpayer filed a return, such as occurs with jeopardy assessments under section 6861. See Treas. Reg. § 1.6664-2(d). The amount considered “collected without assessment” is only the unrefunded and uncredited portion of the excess (if any) of tax payments made before the filing of the return (including wage withholding an

Collective v. Commissioner 159 T.C. No. 6 · 2022

Except as otherwise provided in section 6861 [jeopardy assessments] no assessment of a deficiency in respect of any tax imposed by subtitle A [income tax], or B [estate and gift tax] and no levy or proceeding in court for its collection shall be made, begun, or prosecuted until such notice has been mailed to the taxpayer, nor until expiration of such 90–day or 150–day period, as

But section 6213(a) makes an exception for "jeopardy assessments" under section 6861, and that section authorizes the Commissionerto assess a deficiency even before issuing a notice ofdeficiency ifhe believes the assessment or its collection will be jeopardized by delay.

But section 6213(a) makes an exception for "jeopardy assessments" under section 6861, and that section authorizes the Commissionerto assess a deficiency even before issuing a notice ofdeficiency ifhe believes the assessment or its collection will be jeopardized by delay.

But section 6213(a) makes an exception for "jeopardy assessments" under section 6861, and that section authorizes the Commissionerto assess a deficiency even before issuing a notice ofdeficiency ifhe believes the assessment or its collection will be jeopardized by delay.

But section 6213(a) makes an exception for "jeopardy assessments" under section 6861, and that section authorizes the Commissionerto assess a deficiency even before issuing a notice ofdeficiency ifhe believes the assessment or its collection will be jeopardized by delay.

But section 6213(a) makes an exception for "jeopardy assessments" under section 6861, and that section authorizes the Commissionerto assess a deficiency even before issuing a notice ofdeficiency ifhe believes the assessment or its collection will be jeopardized by delay.

Bibby v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2013-281 · 2013

otice and demand for payment to the person liable for the payment ofthe tax.1 'Pursuant to sec. 1.6851-1, Income Tax Regs., and sec. 301.6861-1, Proced. & Admin. Regs., the Secretary authorizes certain IRS employees to determine (continued...) [*7] Sec. 6861. The existence ofone or more ofthe following conditions supports a determination that collection ofthe tax is injeopardy: (1).the taxpayer is or appears to be designing quickly to depart from the United States or to conceal himselfor herself

Carothers v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2013-165 · 2013

ral rule, which exception the Commissioner may invoke iftwo conditions are met: "(...continued) Flagrant Political Expenditures of Section 501(c)(3) Organizations", sec. 6852, "Jeopardy Assessments ofIncome, Estate, Gift, and Certain Excise Taxes", sec. 6861, and "Jeopardy Assessment ofTaxes Other Than Income, Estate, Gift, and Certain Excise Taxes", sec. 6862. - 19 - [*19] Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a levy action while an appeal is pending if [A] the underlying tax liability is not at iss

Hoover v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2006-82 · 2006

Two days later, respondent sent a letter to petitioner informing him that respondent had made a jeopardy assessment pursuant to section 6861 regarding petitioner’s tax years 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992.

Michael A. & Gina A. Zapara, Petitioner 124 T.C. No. 14 · 2005

5.10.4.1.1(2), which.provides that the sale of seized property will generally be suspended during the administrative review process provided in section 7429.

Stein v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2004-124 · 2004

Although this case does not involve a jeopardy assessment under section 6861, respondent’s security interest in petitioner’s property will be jeopardized if respondent’s security interest is subordinated to those of other creditors, such as the party or parties involved in the foreclosure litigation with respect to petitioner’s condominium against which respondent filed the NFTL.

Green v. Commissioner 121 T.C. No. 18 · 2003

ency as defined in section 6211 will be jeopardized by delay, he shall, notwithstanding section 6213(a), immediately assess such deficiency and make notice and demand for the payment thereof.5 Within 5 days after the date an assessment is made under section 6861 or levy is made under section 6331(a), the Commissioner must provide the taxpayer with a written statement of the information the Commissioner is relying on in making the assessment or levy.

Mendes v. Commissioner 121 T.C. No. 19 · 2003

Pursuant to section 6213(a), unless there is substantial doubt as to the collectibility of the deficiency, such as to justify a jeopardy assessment under section 6861, no assessment of the deficiency (including the section 6654 addition) may be made until the expiration of 90 (or, in certain cases, 150) days after the Commissioner has mailed notice of the deficiency to the taxpayer or, if a petition is filed with this Court, until the decision of this Court has become final.

Green v. Commissioner 121 T.C. 301 · 2003

Within 5 days after the date an assessment is made under section 6861 or levy is made under section 6331(a), the Commissioner must provide the taxpayer with a written statement of the information the Commissioner is relying on in making the assessment or levy.

Mendes v. Commissioner 121 T.C. 308 · 2003

Pursuant to section 6213(a), unless there is substantial doubt as to the collectibility of the deficiency, such as to justify a jeopardy assessment under section 6861, no assessment of the deficiency (including the section 6654 addition) may be made until the expiration of 90 (or, in certain cases, 150) days after the Commissioner has mailed notice of the deficiency to the taxpayer or, if a petition is filed with this Court, until the decision of this Court has become final.

Ahmed and his-wife in their individual capacities notices of jeopardy assessment pursuant to section 6861 for the taxable years 1995 through 1998.

Collins v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 1997-291 · 1997

§ 6861 jeopardy assessment and immediate collection action against him, petitioner has still failed to file any 1994 federal income tax return reflecting his illegal income. am). Petitioner fraudulently failed to file a federal income tax return for the taxable year 1994. an). All of the underpayment of tax required to be shown on petitioner’s fede

McWilliams v. Commissioner 103 T.C. 416 · 1994

In a notice dated July 8, 1994, respondent, under authority of section 6861, mailed a notice to petitioner to inform him that he was the subject of a jeopardy assessment.

Powerstein v. Commissioner 99 T.C. 466 · 1992

Kallich v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 676, 681 (1987), where, in determining whether a petition qualified for small tax case status, we held that the pleadings set the parameters of the amount in dispute. If respondent believed that a jeopardy existed relating to the alleged increased deficiencies, presumably she could assess the increased amount under sec. 6861. Secs. 6861(c), 6212(c); Stokes v. Commissioner, 22 T.C. 415, 422-423 (1954).

Hovind v. Commissioner T.C. Memo. 2006-143 · 2006
Zapara v. Commissioner 124 T.C. 223 · 2005
Miravalle v. Commissioner 105 T.C. 65 · 1995
Coninck v. Commissioner 100 T.C. 495 · 1993
Galusha v. Commissioner 95 T.C. 218 · 1990
Petzoldt v. Commissioner 92 T.C. 661 · 1989
Williams v. Commissioner 92 T.C. 920 · 1989
Abeles v. Commissioner 91 T.C. 1019 · 1988
Kahle v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 1063 · 1987
Matut v. Commissioner 88 T.C. 1250 · 1987
Ramirez v. Commissioner 87 T.C. 643 · 1986
Matut v. Commissioner 84 T.C. 803 · 1985
Frieling v. Commissioner 81 T.C. 42 · 1983
Estate of Bailly v. Commissioner 81 T.C. 949 · 1983
Stone v. Commissioner 73 T.C. 617 · 1980
Hollie v. Commissioner 73 T.C. 1198 · 1980
Camous v. Commissioner 67 T.C. 721 · 1977
Sharpe v. Commissioner 69 T.C. 19 · 1977
Breman v. Commissioner 66 T.C. 61 · 1976
Jones v. Commissioner 62 T.C. 1 · 1974
Wilt v. Commissioner 60 T.C. 977 · 1973
Papa v. Commissioner 55 T.C. 1140 · 1971
Cowan v. Commissioner 54 T.C. 647 · 1970
King v. Commissioner 51 T.C. 851 · 1969
Lerer v. Commissioner 52 T.C. 358 · 1969
Prather v. Commissioner 50 T.C. 445 · 1968
Bunnel v. Commissioner 50 T.C. 837 · 1968
Riss & Co. v. Commissioner 45 T.C. 230 · 1965
Dolan v. Commissioner 44 T.C. 420 · 1965
Ross v. Commissioner 38 T.C. 309 · 1962
Oxford Capital Corp. v. United States 211 F.3d 280 · Cir.
Jefferson Smurfit v. United States · Cir.
JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION, (U.S.) AND SUBSIDIARIES, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT—APPELLANT 439 F.3d 448 · Cir.

New cases, delivered.

Get notified when new Tax Court opinions drop.